Shaping modern Indo-Aryan isoglosses
-
Krzysztof Stroński
und
Saartje Verbeke
Abstract
Since the pioneering paper by Emenau (1956) there have been many attempts (cf. Masica 1976, 2001; Ebert 2001; among many others) to select areal features which are shared among languages spoken in South Asia. However, there has been little consent on the number of such features and the possible direction of their spread.
In this paper we are focusing on two selected isoglosses, namely alignment and constituent order. Both of them have been used to define the Indo-Aryan linguistic area: alignment is one of the key elements to distinguish western from eastern Indo-Aryan (Peterson 2017) and word order is one of the innovations which differentiates some of the “Outer” languages from “Inner” Indo-Aryan languages (Zoller 2017: 15).
This article focuses on two languages which are said to determine these isoglosses: Awadhi and Kashmiri. Our study of Awadhi shows that the isogloss delineating ergative or accusative case marking zones is situated in the area where the so-called Eastern Hindi dialects (among them Awadhi) are spoken. As we will demonstrate, this specific isogloss is substantially supported by diachronic evidence. The second language under consideration, namely Kashmiri, is an example of an “Outer” language with a quite stable V2 feature. Both Awadhi and Kashmiri are compared with Pahari, a language branch which functions as a link between the two of them. Our comparison of Kashmiri with certain Western Pahari Himachali languages shows that there is no clear borderline between two language groups supported by word order. We conclude from these case studies that the study of isoglosses is by definition a study of fluid boundaries, and qualitative, historical studies of one language can prove or disprove hypotheses based on synchronic similarities between languages.
References
Abbi, A. 2000. “Redundancies and restructuring in Bangani syntax: a case of language contact in Western Himalaya”. International Journal of Dravidian linguistics 24(1). 47–56.Suche in Google Scholar
Aissen, J. 2003. “Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 435–483.10.1023/A:1024109008573Suche in Google Scholar
Chālise, B.K. 2006. Aitihāsik abhilekhkā ādhārmā nepālī bhāshākā vyākaraṇ tatvamā kramik vikāsko adhyayan [The study of the stadial development in the Nepali grammar based on historical inscriptions]. (PhD dissertation, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu.)Suche in Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 1979. “Ergativity”. Language 55. 59–138.10.1017/CBO9780511611896Suche in Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611896Suche in Google Scholar
Drocco, A. 2016. “First results of a linguistic fieldwork on Baṅgāṇī”. International journal of language and linguistics 3(3). 108–114.Suche in Google Scholar
Ebert, K. 2001. “Südasien als Sprachbund“. In: Haspelmath, M., E. König, W. Oesterreicher and W. Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1529–1539.Suche in Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. 1956. “India as a linguistic area”. Language 32 (1). 3–16.10.2307/410649Suche in Google Scholar
Enfield, N.J. 2005. “Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia”. Annual Review of Anthropology 34. 181–206.10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120406Suche in Google Scholar
Grierson, G.A. 1931–1933. On the modern Indo-Aryan vernaculars. Indian Antiquary, Vols. LX, LXI, LXII.)Suche in Google Scholar
Hendriksen, H. 1990. “Sentence position of the verb in Himachali”. Acta linguistica hafniensia 22(1). 159–171.10.1080/03740463.1990.10411526Suche in Google Scholar
Hook, P.E. and O.N. Koul. 1996. “Kashmiri as a V2 language”. Paper presented at “Word order in Indian languages”. Hyderabad: CASL Osmania.Suche in Google Scholar
Jaworski R. 2015. IATagger. http://rjawor.vm.wmi.amu.edu.pl/tagging/Suche in Google Scholar
Jha, S. 1985 [1958]. The formation of the Maithili language. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Suche in Google Scholar
Joshi, M.P. and V.S. Negi. 1994. “Was there a Central Pahari? An appraisal of Grierson’s classification of three Pahari languages groups”. In: Joshi, M.P., A.C. Fanger and C.W. Brown (eds.), Himalaya: past and present (vol. 3). Almora: Shree Almora Book Depot. 259–273.Suche in Google Scholar
Khokhlova, L.V. 2000. “Typological evolution of western NIA languages”. Berliner Indologische Studien (BIS) 13/14. 117–142.Suche in Google Scholar
Khokhlova, L.V. 2001. “Ergativity attrition in the history of western new Indo-Aryan languages (Punjabi, Gujarati and Rajastahani)”. The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics. 159–184.10.1515/9783110245264.159Suche in Google Scholar
Liljegren, H. 2014. “A survey of alignment features in the Greater Hindukush with special reference to Indo-Aryan”. In: Suihkonen, P. and L.J. Whaley (eds.), On diversity and complexity of languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 133–174.Suche in Google Scholar
Liperovskij, V.P. 1997. Očerk grammatiki sovremennogo avadhi [An outline of the grammar of Modern Avadhi]. Moskva: Izdatel’skaja Firma ‘Vostočnaja Literatura’ RAN.Suche in Google Scholar
Masica, C.P. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Masica, C.P. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Masica, C.P. 2001. “The definition and significance of linguistic areas: methods, pitfalls, and possibilities (with special reference to the validity of South Asia as a linguistic area)”. In: Singh, R., P. Bhaskararao and K.V. Subbarao (eds.), The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics 2001. Tokyo symposium on South Asian languages: Contact, convergence and typology. New Delhi: Sage. 205–267.Suche in Google Scholar
McGregor, W.B. 2009. “Typology of ergativity”. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 480–508.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00118.xSuche in Google Scholar
McGregor, W.B. 2010. “Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective”. Lingua 120. 1610–1636.10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.010Suche in Google Scholar
Peterson, J. 2017. “Fitting the pieces together – Towards a linguistic prehistory of eastern-central South Asia (and beyond)”. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4(2). 211–257.10.1515/jsall-2017-0008Suche in Google Scholar
Poudel, T. 2008. “Ergativity in Nepali: A historical perspective”. Paper presented at the workshop on case and alignment in Indo-European, University of Bergen, 10– 11 December.Suche in Google Scholar
Saksena, B. 1971 [1937]. Evolution of Awadhi. Delhi-Patna-Varanasi: Motilal Banarsidass.Suche in Google Scholar
Sharma, J.C. 2003. “Outer Siraji: An SVO language”. International Journal of Dravidian linguistics 3. 55–68.Suche in Google Scholar
Smith, R.R. 1974. Awadhi/Kannauji transition phenomena and their correlates: A study in dialect geography. (PhD dissertation, Cornell University.)Suche in Google Scholar
Southworth, F.C. 2005. Linguistic archeology of South Asia. London and New York: Routledge Curzon.10.4324/9780203412916Suche in Google Scholar
Stroński, K. 2011. Synchronic and diachronic aspects of ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: WydawnictwoNaukowe UAM.Suche in Google Scholar
Stroński, K. 2014. “On the syntax and semantics of the past perfect participle and gerundive in early New Indo-Aryan. Evidence from Eastern Pahari”. Folia Linguistica Historica 35. 275–305.10.1515/flih.2014.008Suche in Google Scholar
Tripāthi, V. 1972. Prārambhik avadhī kā adhyayan [The study of Early Awadhi] Ilāhābād: Racnā Prakāśan.Suche in Google Scholar
Verbeke, S. 2013. Alignment and ergativity in the New Indo-Aryan languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110292671Suche in Google Scholar
Verbeke, S. 2018a. “Some linguistic features of the Old Kashmiri language of the Bāṇāsurakathā” Acta Orientalia 71(3). 351–367.10.1556/062.2018.71.3.7Suche in Google Scholar
Verbeke, S. 2018b. Argument structure in Kashmiri. Form and function of pronominal suffixation. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004346789Suche in Google Scholar
Varma, S. 1936. “The Rudhārī dialect”. Indian Linguistics 6. 128–196.Suche in Google Scholar
Wallace, W.D. 1981. “Object-marking in the history of Nepali: A case of syntactic diffusion”. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 11(2). 107–128.Suche in Google Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, A. 2010. Typological variation in grammatical relations. (PhD thesis, Universität Leipzig.)Suche in Google Scholar
Zoller, C.P. 2007. “Is Bangani a V2 language?” European Bulletin of Himalayan Research 31. 83–141.Suche in Google Scholar
Zoller, C.P. 2016. “Outer and Inner Indo-Aryan, and northern India as an ancient linguistic area”. Acta Orientalia 77. 71–132.10.5617/ao.5355Suche in Google Scholar
Zoller, C.P. 2011. “Pahari (in Russian)”. In: Zograph, G.A., T.I. Oranskaia, L.I. Kulikov and P.K. Pandey (eds.), Languages of the world: The New Indo-Aryan languagesJazyki mira: novye indoarijskie jazyki Moscow: Academia. 219–261.Suche in Google Scholar
Zoller, C.P. 2017. “Northern India after and before the arrival of Indo-Aryan”. In: Joshi, B.K. and M.P. Joshi (eds.), Unfolding Central Himalaya. The cradle of culture. 1–45.Suche in Google Scholar
Primary Sources
Chatterji, S.K. and B. Misra (eds.). 1998. Varṇaratnākara of Jyotirisvara Ravisekharācārya. New Delhi: Sahitya Akadami.Suche in Google Scholar
Chhabra, B.Ch. 1957. Antiquities of Chamba state. (Part II.) Memoires of the Archeological Survey of India 72. New Delhi: ASI.Suche in Google Scholar
Gautam, M. 1954. Jāyasī granthavalī [Collected works of Jayasi]. Dehli: Rigal Buk Ḍipo. (J.)Suche in Google Scholar
Jha, S. (ed.). 1954. The songs of Vidyapati. Delhi: MotilalBanarsidass. (V.P.)Suche in Google Scholar
Joshi, M.P. 1983. The Rājanītiśāstra of Chāṇakya. Text and translation. Almora: Śri Mallika Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Joshi, M.P. 2009. “Advent of polities in Uttarkhand (Kumaon and Garhwal)”. In: Lecomte-Tilouine, M. (ed.), Bards and mediums: History, culture, and politics in the central Himalayan kingdoms. Almora: Shri Almora Book Depot. 327–371.Suche in Google Scholar
Koul, O. 2001. Mulaqat. New Delhi.Suche in Google Scholar
Pant, M.R. 2009. “Towards a history of the Khasa empire”. In: Lecomte-Tilouine, M. (ed.), Bards and mediums: History, culture, and politics in the central Himalayan kingdoms. Almora: Shri Almora Book Depot. 293–326.Suche in Google Scholar
Prasad, R.C. (ed.). 1994. Tulsidasa’s shrirama caritamanasa. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited. (T)Suche in Google Scholar
© 2020 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Morphosyntactic isoglosses in Indo-European: An introduction
- The lexicalization of the adjective class as an innovative feature in the Indo-European family
- Marking of quality modifiers in 2nd-generation IE languages
- Oblique anticausatives: A morphosyntactic isogloss in Indo-European
- Correlative negation in Old Persian
- Shaping modern Indo-Aryan isoglosses
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Morphosyntactic isoglosses in Indo-European: An introduction
- The lexicalization of the adjective class as an innovative feature in the Indo-European family
- Marking of quality modifiers in 2nd-generation IE languages
- Oblique anticausatives: A morphosyntactic isogloss in Indo-European
- Correlative negation in Old Persian
- Shaping modern Indo-Aryan isoglosses
