Syntax meets discourse: Locative and deictic (directional) inversion in English

References

Abe, J. 2018. “How to probe expletives”. Studia Linguistica 72(1). 76–112.10.1111/stul.12057Search in Google Scholar

Aissen, J. 1975. “Presentational there-insertion: A cyclic root transformation”. Papers from the 11th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 11(1). 1–14.Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, V. & M. Frascarelli. 2010. “Is Topic a root phenomenon?” Iberia 2(1). 43–88.Search in Google Scholar

Birner, B.J. 1996. The discourse function of inversion in English New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Birner, B.J. and G. Ward. 1998. Information status and noncanonical word order in English Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.40Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, J. 1994. “Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar”. Language 70. 72–131.10.2307/416741Search in Google Scholar

Breul, C. 2004. Focus structure in generative grammar. An integrated syntactic, semantic and intonational approach Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.68Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, B. 2010. “Language-particular syntactic rules and constraints: English locative inversion and do-support”. Language 86(1). 43–84.10.1353/lan.0.0201Search in Google Scholar

Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax Reidel: Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Search in Google Scholar

Casielles-Suárez, E. 2004. The syntax-information structure interface: Evidence from Spanish and English New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203501719Search in Google Scholar

Chen, R. 2003. English inversion: A ground-before-figure construction Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110895100Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist program Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2008. “On phases”. In Freidin, R., C. Otero and M.L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 133–166.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, C. 1997. Local economy Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Coopmans, P. 1989. “Where stylistic and syntactic processes meet: Locative inversion in English”. Language 65. 728–751.10.2307/414932Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, P. and R. Levine. 2001. “Stylistic inversion in English: A reconsideration”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19. 283–310.10.1023/A:1010646417840Search in Google Scholar

Deal, A.R. 2009. “The origin and content of expletives: evidence from ‘selection’”. Syntax 12(4). 285–323.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2009.00127.xSearch in Google Scholar

Den Dikken, M. 2010. “On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs”. In Cinque, G. and L. Rizzi (eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs – The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol. 6). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 74–126.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

De Wit, A. 2016. “The relation between aspect and inversion in English”. English Language and Linguistics 20(1). 107–128.10.1017/S1360674315000301Search in Google Scholar

Diercks, M. 2107. “Locative inversion”. In Everaert, M. and H.C. Van Riemsdijk (eds.) The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax (2nd edition): chapter 82.Search in Google Scholar

Drăgan, R. 2011. “Motion verbs and the expression of directed motion in English”. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics XIII(2). 73–89.Search in Google Scholar

Dorgeloh, H. 1997. Inversion in Modern English: Form and function Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.6Search in Google Scholar

Drubig, H. 1988. “On the discourse function of subject-verb inversion”. In Klegraf, J. and D. Nehls (eds.), Essays on the English language and applied linguistics on the occasion of Gerhard Nickel’s 60th birthday Heidelberg: Julius Groos. 83–95.Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, J. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure-preserving, and local transformations New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, J. 2004. “Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions”. In Adger, D., C. de Cat and G. Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 75–120.10.1007/1-4020-1910-6_4Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik- Shir, N. 1997. The dynamics of focus structure Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519949Search in Google Scholar

Fernández Soriano, O. 1990. “Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish locative and dative subjects”. Syntax 2(2). 101–140.10.1111/1467-9612.00017Search in Google Scholar

Frascarelli, M. and R. Hinterhölzl. 2007. “Types of topics in German and Italian”. In: Schwabe, K. and S. Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 87–116.10.1075/la.100.07fraSearch in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, J. and T. Fretheim. 2005. “Topic and focus”. In Horn, L. and G. Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics Wiley: Blackwell. 175–196.Search in Google Scholar

Gupton, T. 2010. The syntax-information structure interface: Subjects and clausal word order in Galician. (PhD dissertation. University of Iowa.)Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 2002. “Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP”. In Mauck, S. and J. Mittelstaedt (eds.), Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2. 117–180.Search in Google Scholar

Heycock, C. 2006. “Embedded root phenomena”. In Everaert, M. and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax (vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell. 174–209.10.1002/9780470996591.ch23Search in Google Scholar

Hoekstra, T. and R. Mulder. 1990. “Unergatives as copular verbs; locational and existential predication”. The Linguistic Review 7. 1–-79.10.1515/tlir.1990.7.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Hooper, J. and S. Thompson. 1973. “On the applicability of root transformations”. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 465–497.Search in Google Scholar

Irwin, P.L. 2012. Unaccusatives at the interfaces. (PhD thesis, New York University.)Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. 1990. Semantic structures Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jiménez-Fernández, Á.L. and S. Miyagawa. 2014. “A feature-inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation”. Lingua 145. 275–302.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.008Search in Google Scholar

Jiménez-Fernández, Á.L. 2018. “Negative preposing: intervention and parametric variation in complement clauses”. Atlantis 40(1). 11–37.10.28914/Atlantis-2018-40.1.01Search in Google Scholar

Kathol, A. and R. Levine. 1992. “Inversion as a linearization effect”. Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society 23. 207–221.Search in Google Scholar

Kay, P. and L. Michaelis. 2017. Partial inversion in English. (Unpublished ms., Stanford University and University of Colorado Boulder.)10.21248/hpsg.2017.12Search in Google Scholar

Koopman, H. 2000. The syntax of specifiers and heads London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203171608Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R. 1993. “Reference-point constructions”. Cognitive Linguistics 4. 1–38.10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, H. 1995. “Case and expletives revisited: On Greed and other human failings”. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 615–633.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity at the syntax-lexical semantics interface Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

López, L. 2009. A derivational syntax for information structure Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557400.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mateu, J. 2002. Argument structure. Relational construal at the syntax-semantics interface. (PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.)Search in Google Scholar

Milsark, G.L. 1977. “Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English”. Linguistic Analysis 3. 1–30.Search in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, S. 2017. Agreement beyond Phi Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10958.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ojea, A. 2017. “Core intentional features in the syntactic computation: deriving the position of the subject in Spanish”. Lingua 195. 72–91.10.1016/j.lingua.2017.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Ojea, A. 2019. “EPP-satisfaction on discourse grounds: the case of Locative Inversion”. Syntax 22. 248–273.10.1111/synt.12181Search in Google Scholar

Ojea, A. 2020. “The syntax of thetic statements in English”. Atlantis 42. 143–162.10.28914/Atlantis-2020-42.1.08Search in Google Scholar

Perlmutter, D. 1978. “Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis”. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 157–189.10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198Search in Google Scholar

Postal, P. 1977. “About a nonargument for raising”. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 141–154.Search in Google Scholar

Postal, P. 2004. “A paradox in English syntax”. Skeptical linguistic essays Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, T. 1981. “Pragmatics and linguistics: an analysis of sentence topics”. Philosophica 27. 53–94.10.21825/philosophica.82606Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, T. 2006. Interface strategies: Optimal and costly computations Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3846.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. and U. Shlonsky. 2006. “Satisfying the Subject Criterion by a non subject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift”. In Frascarelli, M. (ed.), Phases of interpretation Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 341–361.10.1515/9783110197723.5.341Search in Google Scholar

Sasse, H. 1987. “The thetic/categorical distinction revisited”. Linguistics 25. 511–580.10.1515/ling.1987.25.3.511Search in Google Scholar

Speas, P. and C. Tenny. 2003. “Configurational properties of point of view roles”. In Di Sciullo, A.M. (ed), Asymmetry in grammar Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 315–344.10.1075/la.57.15speSearch in Google Scholar

Stowell, T. 1978. “What was there before there was there? In Farkas, D., W.M. Jacobsen and K.W. Todrys, Papers from the 14th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 458–471.Search in Google Scholar

Stowell, T. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. (PhD dissertation, MIT.)Search in Google Scholar

Ura, H. 1996. Multiple feature-checking: A theory of grammatical function splitting. (PhD dissertation, MIT.)Search in Google Scholar

Vallduví, E. 1992 The informational component New York: Garland Press.Search in Google Scholar

Webelhuth, G. 2011. “Motivating non-canonicality in Construction Grammar: The case of locative inversion”. Cognitive Linguistics 22. 81–105.10.1515/cogl.2011.004Search in Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M.L. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M.L. and E. Oh. 2007. On the syntactic composition of manner and motion Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5132.001.0001Search in Google Scholar