Reportative evidentiality and attribution in Romanian fairy tales

References

Aikhenvald, A. & A. Storch. 2013. Perception and cognition in typological perspective”. In A. Aikhenvald & A. Storch (eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture, 1–46. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004210127Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A.Y. 2003. Evidentiality in a typological perspective. In A.Y. Aikhenvald & R. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 1–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.54Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A.Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A.Y. 2007. Information source and evidentiality: what can we conclude? Rivista di Linguistica/Italian Journal of Linguistics 19(1). 209–227.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A.Y. 2015. Evidentials: Their links with other grammatical categories. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 239–277.10.1515/lingty-2015-0008Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A.Y. & R. Dixon. 2003. Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.54Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A. & E. Anagnostopoulou. 2007. The subject in situ generalization revisited”. In H. Gärtner & U. Sauerland (eds.), Interfaces + recursion, 31–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Angelescu. 2002. Legenda. Bucharest: Editura Valahia.Search in Google Scholar

Auwera, J. & V. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map”. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79Search in Google Scholar

Avram, L. & V. Hill. 1997. An irrealis be in Romanian. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Boas, F. 1938. Language. In F. Boas (ed.), General anthropology, 124–145. Boston: Heath and Co.Search in Google Scholar

Boye, K. 2012. Epistemic meaning: A cross-linguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110219036Search in Google Scholar

Branigan, P. 2001. Provocative syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Buchstaller, I. & I. van Alphen (eds.). 2012. Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and crossdisciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.15Search in Google Scholar

Bˆarlea, O. 1981. Folclorul românesc [Romanian folklore], vol. I. Bucharest: Editura Minerva.Search in Google Scholar

Caballero, R. & C. Paradis. 2017. Verbs in speech framing expressions: Comparing English and Spanish. Journal of Linguistics 54(1). 45–84.10.1017/S0022226717000068Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, W. & J. Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Chelaru, O. 2013. De la basmul popular românesc la basmul cult european. In Metafore ale devenirii din perspectiva migrației contemporane. Național şi internațional în limba şi cultura română. Iaşi: Editura Alfa.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, C. & P. Branigan. 1997. Quotative inversion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15(1). 1–41.10.1023/A:1005722729974Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 2000. Evidentials: Semantics and history. In L. Johanson & B. Utas (eds.), Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages, 1–12. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110805284.1Search in Google Scholar

Cornillie, B. 2004. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language 16(1). 44–62.10.1075/fol.16.1.04corSearch in Google Scholar

Corniş-Pope, M. & J. Neubauer. 2007. History of the literary cultures of East Central Europe: Junctures and disjunctures in the 19th and 20th centuries. (Volume iii: The making and remaking of literary institutions. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/chlel.xxiiSearch in Google Scholar

Coşeriu,E. 1976. Das romanische verbal System. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Cruschina, S. & E.M. Remberger. 2008. Hearsay and reported speech: Evidentiality in romance. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa (33). 95–116.Search in Google Scholar

Cruschina, S. & E.M. Remberger. 2017. The rise and development of evidential and epistemic markers. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7(1/2).10.1075/jhl.7.1-2.01cruSearch in Google Scholar

Curnow, T.J. 2003. Nonvolitionality expressed through evidentials. Studies in Language 27. 39–60.10.1075/sl.27.1.03curSearch in Google Scholar

De Haan, F. 2001. The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte 9. 201–216.Search in Google Scholar

De Haan, F. 2005. Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodges & D. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 379–397. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.72.18haaSearch in Google Scholar

Dendale, P. 1994. Devoir epistemique, marqueur modal ou evidentiel? Langue Française 102. 24–40.10.3406/lfr.1994.5712Search in Google Scholar

Dendale, P. & J. Bogaert. 2007. A semantic description of French lexical evidential markers and the classification of evidentials. Rivista di Linguistica 19(1). 65–89.Search in Google Scholar

Dendale, P. & L. Tasmowski. 1994. Presentation. L’evidentialité ou le marquage des sources du savoir. Langue Française 102. 3–7.10.3406/lfr.1994.5710Search in Google Scholar

Dendale, P. & L. Tasmowski. 2001. Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 339–348.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00005-9Search in Google Scholar

Diewald, G. & E. Smirnova (eds.). 2010. Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110223972Search in Google Scholar

Dirven, R., L. Goossens, Y. Putseys & E. Vorlat. 1982. The scene of linguistic action and its perspectivization by speak, talk, say and tell. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pb.iii.6Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, W. 1970. Comment décrire la syntaxe des cas en Latin? Revue de Philologie 44. 25-36.Search in Google Scholar

Eliade, M. 2000. Istoria credinţelor şi ideilor religioase. Bucharest: Editura Univers enciclopedic.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fairy tales and legends from Romania. 1972. New York: Twayne Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, B. 2001. Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11. 167–192.10.1525/jlin.2001.11.2.167Search in Google Scholar

Frawley, W. 1992. Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Freeborn, D. 1996. Style. text analysis and linguistic criticism. (2nd ed.) London: Macmillan Press Ltd.10.1007/978-1-349-24710-3Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, V.A. 1997. On the number of paradigms in the Romanian presumptive mood (modul prezumtiv). Studii şi Cercetări Lingvistice 48(1–4).173–79.Search in Google Scholar

Gaulmyn, M.-M., de .1992. Le discours rapporte de la langage parle. In A.M. Jaussaud& J. Petrissans (eds.), Grammaire et français langue etrangere, Actes de Congres ANEFLE, 1989, 22–33. Grenoble.Search in Google Scholar

Głowinski, M. 1997. Dialog w powieści [Dialogue in novels]. In M. Głowinski, Narracje literackie i nieliterackie [Literary and non-literary narrations], 39–53. Kraków: Universitas.Search in Google Scholar

Goossens, L. 1990. Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3). 323–340.10.1515/9783110219197.349Search in Google Scholar

Goudet, J. 1977. An attempt at interpreting the periphrastic verbal system: A Fi + Gerund. In S. Alexandrescu (ed.), Transformational grammar and the Rumanian language. Lisse. 53–59.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H.P.1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3: Speech acts 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Guardamagna, C. 2017. Reportative evidentiality, attribution and epistemic modality: A corpus-based diachronic study of Latin Secundum NP (‘According To NP’). Language Sciences 59. 159–179.10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Hagège, C. 1995. Le rôle des médiaphoriques dans la langue et dans le discourse. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 90. 1–19.10.2143/BSL.90.1.2002526Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In M. Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language 2, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Herman, D. 2009. Cognitive approaches to narrative analysis. In G. Brône and J. Vandaele (eds.), Cognitive poetics. Goals, gains and gaps, 79–118. Berlin–New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Ifantidou, E. 2001. Evidentials and relevance. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.86Search in Google Scholar

Iordan, I. and V. Robu. 1978. Limba română contemporană. [Contemporary Romanian]. Bucharest: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică.Search in Google Scholar

Irimia, D. 1983. Structura gramaticală a limbii române [The grammatical structure of Romanian]. Iaşi: Editura Junimea.Search in Google Scholar

Irimia, M.A. 2010. Some remarks on the evidential nature of the Romanian presumptive. In R. Bok-Bennema, B. Kampers-Manhe and B. Hollebrandse (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2008: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, 125–144. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/rllt.2.08iriSearch in Google Scholar

Irimia, M.A. 2017. Indirect evidentials and TAM: more evidence for the sentience domain projection. In A. Kaplan, M. McCarvel and E.J. Rubin (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Irimia, M.A. 2018. Pragmatics or morpho-syntax? The encoding of indirect evidentiality in Romanian. Journal of Pragmatics 2018. 267–276.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.11.015Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. 1957. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Johansen, M. 2011. Agency and responsibility in reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 2845–2860.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Joseph, B. 2003. Evidentiality in proto-Indo-European? Building a case. In K. Jones-Bley, M. Huld, A. Della Volpe and M. Dexter Robbins (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Los Angeles, 8–9 November 2002 Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 47), 96–111. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, M.S. 2005. Evidentiality in achieving entitlement, objectivity, and detachment in Korean conversation. Discourse Studies 7(1). 87–108..10.1177/1461445605048768Search in Google Scholar

Kim, M.S. 2011. Negotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversation: An examination of the Korean evidential marker -tamye Discourse Studies 13(4). 435–459.10.1177/1461445611403259Search in Google Scholar

Kissine, M. 2010. Metaphorical projection, subjectification and English speech act verbs. Folia Linguistica 44(2). 339–370.10.1515/flin.2010.013Search in Google Scholar

Klamer, M. 2000. How report verbs become quote markers and complementisers. Lingua 110. 69–98.10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00032-7Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. 1996. Sorry, I am not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In G. Fauconnier & E. Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammar, 91–123. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110800524Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. 2001. Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12. 143–188.10.1515/cogl.12.2.143Search in Google Scholar

Lazard, G. 2001. On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. In: Journal of Pragmatics 33. 359–367.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00008-4Search in Google Scholar

Leech, G.N & M. Short. 2003. Style in fiction. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Mel’čuk, I. 2004. Actants in syntax. Linguistics 42(2). 247–291.10.1515/ling.2004.009Search in Google Scholar

McHale, B. 2011. Speech representation. Retrieved November 19, 2017, from http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/index.php/Speech_RepresentationSearch in Google Scholar

Mihoc, T. 2012. The Romanian presumptive mood: Inferential evidentiality and upper-end degree epistemic modality. Ottawa: University of Ottawa MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Mushin, I. 2001. Evidentiality and epistemological stance: narrative retelling. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.87Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, N.1985. How proverbs mean: Semantic studies in English proverbs. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.10.1515/9783110881974Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, J. 2001. Epistemic modality, language and conceptualization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.5Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, F.R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, F.R. 2001. Mood and modality. (2nd edn.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139167178Search in Google Scholar

Pietrandrea, P. 2007. The grammatical nature of some epistemic-evidential adverbs in spoken Italian. Italian Journal of Linguistics 19(1). 39–63.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, C.-M. 2012. Le futur, le présomptif et le conditionnel dans le système verbal du roumain. Hypothèses et hypostases. In R. Zafiu, A. Dragomirescu & A. Nicolae (eds.), Limba română: Direcţii actuale în cercetarea lingvistică (I): Gramatică. Fonetică şi fonologie. Istoria limbii române, Filologie Actele celui de al 11-lea Colocviu Internaţional al Departamentului de Lingvistică, Bucharest, 9–10 decembrie 2011, 199–208. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, C-M. & O.-A. Duţă. 2017. Presumptive in Romanian language, an evidential and/or epistemic marker. In J.I. Marín-Arrese, J. Lavid-López, M. Carretero, E. Domínguez Romero, M.V. Martín de la Rosa & M. Pérez Blanco (eds.), Evidentiality and modality in European languages, 33–55. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Propp, V. 1993. Rădăcinile istorice ale basmului fantastic. Bucharest: Editura Univers.Search in Google Scholar

Reinheimer-Rîpeanu, S. 1994. Ce-o fi o fi. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 29(5–6). 511–527.Search in Google Scholar

Reinheimer-Rîpeanu, S. 2000. Le présomptif roumain: marqueur évidentiel et épistemique. In Traiani Augusti vestigia pressa sequamur: Studia linguistica in honorem Lilianae Tasmowski, 481–491. Padova: Unipress.Search in Google Scholar

Remberger, E.-M. 2009. The syntax of evidential markers: The Romanian hearsay marker Cică Communication Tagung zur Generativen Grammatik des Südens, Leipzig, 22–24 May.Search in Google Scholar

Rooryck, J. 2001. Evidentiality, part I. GLOT International 5(4). 125–133.Search in Google Scholar

Rosier, L. 2008. Le discours rapporté en français. Paris: Ophrys.Search in Google Scholar

Ruxandoiu, P. 2003. Proverb şi context. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Search in Google Scholar

San Roque, L., S. Floyd & E. Norcliffe. 2017. Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua 186–187. 120–143.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, W, 2005. Elemente der Narratologie. Berlin: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Semino, E & Short, M. 2004. Corpus stylistics. Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203494073Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, M. 2001. The internal structure of evidentiality in Romance. Studies in Language 25(2). 297–331.10.1075/sl.25.2.05squSearch in Google Scholar

Squartini, M. 2004. Disentangling evidentiality and epistemic modality in Romance. Lingua 114(7). 873–895.10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00064-0Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, M. 2005. L’Evidenzialità nel romeno e nelle altre lingue romanze. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 121. 246–268.10.1515/ZRPH.2005.246Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, M. 2007. Evidentiality between lexicon and grammar. Rivista di Linguistica 19(1). 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, M. 2008. Lexical grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics 46(5). 917–947.10.1515/LING.2008.030Search in Google Scholar

Suñer, M. 2000. The syntax of direct quotes with special reference to Spanish and English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(3). 525–578.10.1007/s11049-007-9022-0Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, D. 1989. Talking voices. Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tantucci, V. 2013. Interpersonal evidentiality: The Mandarin V-Guo construction and other evidential systems beyond the ‘source of information’. Journal of Pragmatics 57. 210–230.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.013Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, G. 1996. Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports. Applied Linguistics 17. 501–530.10.1093/applin/17.4.501Search in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, J. & V. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79Search in Google Scholar

Verschueren, J. (ed.). 1987. Linguistic action: Some empirical-conceptual studies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Vincent, D. & S. Dubois. 1996. A study on the use of reported speech in spoken language. In J. Arnold et al. (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation. Data, theory and analysis, 361–374. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Vincent, D. & S. Dubois. 1997. Le discours direct: collection langue et pratiques discursives. Quebec: Centre International de Recherche en amenagment linguistique.Search in Google Scholar

Wiemer, B. 2010. Hearsay in European languages: toward an integrative account of grammatical and lexical marking. In G. Diewald & E. Smirnova (eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages, 59–129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. 1987. English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Willett, T. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12. 51–97.10.1075/sl.12.1.04wilSearch in Google Scholar

Zafiu, R. 2002. Evidențialitatea în limba româna actuală [Evidentiality in contemporary Romanian]. In G. Pană Dindelegan (ed.), Aspecte ale dinamicii limbii române actuale [Aspects of contemporary Romanian], 127–44. Bucharest: Editura Universității din București.Search in Google Scholar

Zafiu, R. 2009. Interpretări gramaticale ale prezumtivului. In R. Zafiu, B. Croitor & A.-M. Mihail (eds.), Studii de gramatică. Omagiu Doamnei Profesoare Valeria Guțu Romalo, 289–305. Bucharest: Editura Universității din București.Search in Google Scholar

Zipes, J. 2002. Breaking the magic spell: Radical theories of folk and fairy tales. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky.Search in Google Scholar