Anger in action: Socio-pragmatic analysis of verbal exchanges in UK parliamentary debates
-
Marta Strukowska
Abstract
This article is an attempt to investigate theoretically and empirically how the emotion of anger is used in political discourse. The descriptive analysis is centred around the conversational analysis of anger, as present in the verbal exchanges in the UK parliamentary debates, correlated with the variables of power (P), social distance (D), and the concept of valence. The key idea underbracing this article is that affect permeates social communication. The central claims of this study focus on explaining how the socio-pragmatic variables of (P) and (D) weave the fabric of conflict talk and how they constitute the springboard for structuring the affective message in a tangible framework of social practice. The questions that inspire the current paper are the following: (1) How does anger determine the relationships of power and distance? (2) What is the reaction of the Offender and Defender in anger-driven interaction? (3) Are the roles of the ‘Emoter’ and ‘Receiver’ of anger evenly distributed in verbal communication? (4) Are valence and its strength indicators of anger experience? The paper concentrates on three theoretical problems including: (1) anger as an intrinsically threatening emotion, (2) anger as a constituent of context, and (3) anger as a gradable emotion. In addition, this study aims to explore how threats to positive face value in the form of unambiguous literal meaning that convey evaluative load (accusations, criticism, insult, irony, imposition etc.), explicitly provide information on P and D shifts in anger-driven discursive action.
References
Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics. (Translated by W. D. Ross). Kitchener: Batoche Books.10.1093/oseo/instance.00258595Suche in Google Scholar
Barbe, K. 1995. Irony in context. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.34Suche in Google Scholar
Bargh, J.A. and T.L. Chartrand. 1999. “The unbearable automaticity of being”. American Psychologist 54. 462–479.10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462Suche in Google Scholar
Barrett, L.F. 1998. “Discrete emotions or dimensions? The role of valence focus and arousal focus”. Cognition and Emotion 12(4). 579–599.10.1080/026999398379574Suche in Google Scholar
Barrett, L.F. 2005. “Feeling is perceiving: Core affect in the experience of emotion”. In: Barrett, L.F., P.M. Niedenthal and P. Winkielman (eds.), Emotion and consciousness. 255–285. New York: The Guildford Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Barrett, L.F. 2006a. “Valence is a basic building block of emotional life”. Journal of Research in Personality 40. 35–55.10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.006Suche in Google Scholar
Barrett, L.F. 2006b. “Are emotions natural kinds?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1. 28–58.10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.xSuche in Google Scholar
Bates, E. 1976. Language and context: the acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. 2007. “Impoliteness, preference organization and conductivity”. Multilingua 26(1–2). 1–33.10.1515/MULTI.2007.001Suche in Google Scholar
Brendl, M.C. and T.E. Higgins. 1996. “Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative?”. In: Zanna, M.P. (ed.), 95–160.Suche in Google Scholar
Brockeriede, W. 1972. “Arguers as lovers”. Philosophy and Rhetoric 5. 1–11.Suche in Google Scholar
Brown, P. and S.C. Levinson. 1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Suche in Google Scholar
Caffi, C. and R.W. Janney. 1994. “Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication”. Journal of Pragmatics 22. 325–373.10.1016/0378-2166(94)90115-5Suche in Google Scholar
Coulthard, M. 1977. An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. 2011. Impoliteness. Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Suche in Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. 1957. “The concept of power”. Behavioral Science 2. 201–215.10.1002/bs.3830020303Suche in Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. 1958. “Trust and suspicion”. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2. 265–279.10.1177/002200275800200401Suche in Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. 1973. “Conflicts: Productive and destructive”. In: Jandt, F. F. (ed.), Conflict resolution through communication. New York: Harper and Row. 155–197.Suche in Google Scholar
Ekman, P. 2003. Emotions revealed. Canada: H. B Fenn and Company Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar
Fiedler, K. 2004. “Tools, toys, truisms, and theories: Some thoughts on the creative cycle of theory formation”. Society for Personality and Social Psychology 8. 123–131. Available https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_5 (Last accessed 19 Jan 2018.)10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_5Suche in Google Scholar
Givon, T. (ed.). 1997. Conversation. Cognitive, communicative and social perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.34Suche in Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1956. The presentation of self in everyday life. University of Edinburgh.Suche in Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1967 Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behaviour. London: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. and M. Harness Goodwin. 1987. “Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments”. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1). 1–55.10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01gooSuche in Google Scholar
Grice, P. 1975. “Logic and conversation”. In: Cole, P. and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. 41–58.10.1163/9789004368811_003Suche in Google Scholar
Grimshaw, A.D. 1980. "Mishearings, misunderstandings, and other nonsuccesses in talk: A plea for redress of speaker-oriented bias”. Sociological Inquiry 50. 31–74.10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00016.xSuche in Google Scholar
Grimshaw, A.D. 1990. Conflict talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2001. On the pragmatics of social interaction. (Translated by Barbara Fultner). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1974. Toward ethnographies of communication. In: Hymes, D., Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 3–28.Suche in Google Scholar
Izard, C. 1977. Human emotions. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-2209-0Suche in Google Scholar
Kemper, T.D. 1991. “Predicting emotions from social relations”. Social Psychology Quarterly 54. 330–342.10.2307/2786845Suche in Google Scholar
King, A. 1987. Power and communication. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, R.T. and D. Tannen. 1979. “Communicative strategies in conversation: the case of ‘Scenes from a marriage’”. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 5. 581–592.10.3765/bls.v5i0.2149Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lang, P.J., M.M. Bradley and B.N. Cuthbert. 1990. “Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex”. Psychological Review 97(3). 377–395.10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.377Suche in Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. 1991. Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Leech, G.N. 1980. Language and tact. Amsterdam.Suche in Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C. 1977. Social deixis in a Tamil village. (PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.)Suche in Google Scholar
Slugoski, B.R. 1985. Grice’s theory of conversation as a social psychological model. (PhD dissertation, University of Oxford.)Suche in Google Scholar
Muecke, D.C. 1969. The compass of irony. London: Methuen.Suche in Google Scholar
Niemeier, S. and R. Dirven (eds.). 1997. The language of emotions. Conceptualisation, expression and theoretical foundation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.85Suche in Google Scholar
Plutchik, R. 1962. The emotions: Facts, theories and a new model. New York: Random House.Suche in Google Scholar
Plutchik, R. 1980. “A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion”. In: Plutchik, R. and H. Kellerman (eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience. 3–33.Suche in Google Scholar
Rogers, M.F. 1974. “Instrumental and infra-resources: the bases of power”. American Journal of Sociology 79. 1418–1433.10.1086/225708Suche in Google Scholar
Sacks, H. 1995. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444328301Suche in Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. 1996. “Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction”. In: Ochs, E, A. Schegloff and S. Thompson (eds.), Grammar and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620874Suche in Google Scholar
Sillars, A.L., S.F. Coletti, D. Parry, and M.A. Rogers. 1982. “Coding verbal conflict tactics: nonverbal and perceptual correlates of the ‘avoidance-distributive-integrative’ distinction”. Human Communication Research 9(1). 83–95.10.1111/j.1468-2958.1982.tb00685.xSuche in Google Scholar
Sillars, A.L. 1986. Procedures for coding interpersonal conflict (revised). Department of Interpersonal Communication. University of Montana.Suche in Google Scholar
Smith, A.A. 1984. “Two theories of historical materialism”. Theory and Society 13(4). 513–540.10.1007/BF00156901Suche in Google Scholar
Soloman, L. 1960. “The influence of some types of power relationships and game strategies upon the development of interpersonal trust” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 61. 223–230.10.1037/h0047571Suche in Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1991. “Irony and the use-mention distinction”. In: Cole, P. (ed.), 295–318.Suche in Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1982. “Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives”. Language 58(1).10.2307/413530Suche in Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1989. Talking voices. Repetition. dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
TenHouten, W.D. 2007. A general theory of emotions and social life. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203013441Suche in Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. 2005a. “Beyond the micro-level in politeness research”. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1(2). 237–262.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237Suche in Google Scholar
Tomkins, S.S. 2008. Affect imagery consciousness. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar
Watson, D., L. Clark and A. Tellegen. 1988. “Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54. 1063–1070.10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063Suche in Google Scholar
Watson, D. and A. Tellegen. 1985. “Toward a consensual structure of mood”. Psychological Bulletin 98. 219–235.10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219Suche in Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1968. Economy and society. (Translated by Ephraim Fischoff et al.) New York: Bredminster Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. 1988. “The Bulge: A theory of speech behaviour and social distance”. In: Fine, J. (ed.), Second language discourse: A textbook of current research. NJ: Ablex. 21–38.Suche in Google Scholar
Wundt, W. 1902. Outlines of Psychology. New York: W. Englemann.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2019 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
