A feature-based analysis of the syntax of the clause-initial particle ʁedɪ in North Hail Arabic

References

Abels, K. 2012. “The Italian left periphery: A view from locality”. Linguistic Inquiry 43(1). 229–254.10.1162/LING_a_00084Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, A.Y. 2003. “Evidentiality in typological perspective”. Typological Studies in Language 54. 1–32.10.1075/tsl.54.04aikSearch in Google Scholar

Alshamari, M.R. 2015a. “Pragmatic analysis of the particle ʁadI in Najdi Arabic”. International Journal of Linguistics 7(2). 81–93.10.5296/ijl.v7i2.7176Search in Google Scholar

Alshamari, M.R. 2015b. “Documentation of discourse-related particles in North Hail Arabic”. English Linguistics Research 4(4). 44–57.10.5430/elr.v4n4p44Search in Google Scholar

Alshamari, M.R. 2015c. “A relevance-theoretical account of three discourse markers in North Hail Arabic”. Studies in Literature and Language 11(1). 6–15.Search in Google Scholar

Alshamari, M. R. and M. Jarrah. 2016. “A minimalist-based approach to phrasal verb movement in North Hail Arabic”. International Journal of English Linguistics 6(1). 24–37.10.5539/ijel.v6n1p24Search in Google Scholar

Alshamari, M.R. 2016. “In favor of contrastive Topic Phrase in North Hail Arabic left periphery: Evidence from the discourse particle TARA. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 20. 23–39.Search in Google Scholar

Bayer, J. and H.G. Obenauer. 2011. „Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types”. The linguistic review 28(4). 449–491.10.1515/tlir.2011.013Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, A. 2004. “Aspects of the low IP area. The structure of CP and IP”. The cartography of syntactic structures 2. 16–51.Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, V. and M. Frascarelli. 2010. “Is topic a root phenomenon?” Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(1). 43–88.Search in Google Scholar

Biberauer, T. and M. Sheehan. 2011. “Introduction: particles through a modern syntactic lens”. The Linguistic Review 28(4). 387–410.10.1515/tlir.2011.011Search in Google Scholar

Biberauer, T., L. Haegeman and A. Kemenade. 2014. “Putting our heads together: Towards a syntax of particles”. Studia Linguistica 68. 1–15.10.1111/stul.12021Search in Google Scholar

Bobaljik, J.D. 2002. “Realizing Germanic inflection: Why morphology does not drive syntax”. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6(2). 129–167.10.1023/A:1023669927250Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2011. “On valued uninterpretable features”. In: Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 39).Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2014. “Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis”. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1). 27–89.10.1162/LING_a_00148Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, W.L. 1976. “Givenness, contractiveness, definiteness, subjects and Topics”. In:. C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. 25–55.Search in Google Scholar

Cecchetto, C. 1999. “A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance”. Studia Linguistica 53(1). 40–67.10.1111/1467-9582.00039Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1993. “A minimalist program for linguistic theory”. In: Hale, K. and S.J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1999. Derivation by phase. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Department of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: The framework”. In: Lasnik, H., R.Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2001. “Derivation by phase”. In: Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale. A Life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2005. On Phases. (Ms., MIT.)Search in Google Scholar

Collins, C. 2001. “Economy conditions in syntax”. In: Baltin, M. and C. Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Oxford: Blackwell. 45–61.10.1002/9780470756416.ch2Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, S., H. Kitahara and D. Seely. 2010. “Uninterpretable features: What are they, and what do they do?” In: Putnam, M. (ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 125–142.10.1075/lfab.3.07epsSearch in Google Scholar

Elenbaas, M. and A. Kemenade. 2014. “Verb particles and OV/VO in the history of English”. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 140–167.10.1111/stul.12018Search in Google Scholar

Felser, C. 2004. “Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity”. Lingua 114(5). 543–574.10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00054-8Search in Google Scholar

Frascarelli, M. 2008. “The fine structure of the Topic field”. In: De Cat, C. and K. Demuth (eds.), The Bantu–Romance connection. A comparative investigation of verbal agreement, DPs, and information structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 261–292.10.1075/la.131.15fraSearch in Google Scholar

Frascarelli, M. and R. Hinterhölzl. 2007. ”Types of Topics in German and Italian”. In: Schwabe, K and S. Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 87–116.10.1075/la.100.07fraSearch in Google Scholar

Grewendorf, G. 2005. “The discourse configurationality of scrambling”. In: Sabel, J. and M. Saito (eds.), The free word order phenomenon: Its syntactic sources and diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter. 75–135.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 2006. “Conditionals, factives and the left periphery”. Lingua 116(10). 1651–1669.10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.014Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 2010. “The internal syntax of adverbial clauses”. Lingua 120(3). 628–648.10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.007Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L., A. Meinunger and A. Vercauteren. 2015. „The Syntax of It-clefts and the left periphery of the clause”. In: Schlonsky, U. (ed.), Beyond functional sequence: The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 73–90.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210588.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Hill, V. 2002. “Complementizer Phrases (CP) in Romanian”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 14. 223–248.Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, A. 1999. “Remarks on Holmberg’s generalization”. Studia linguistica 53(1). 1–39.10.1111/1467-9582.00038Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, A. 2000. “Scandinavian stylistic fronting: How any category can become an expletive”. Linguistic inquiry 31(3). 445–483.10.1162/002438900554406Search in Google Scholar

Jarrah, M. and A. Zibin. 2016. “Syntactic investigation of nunnation in Haili Arabic”. Sky Journal of Linguistics 29.Search in Google Scholar

Källgren, G. and E.F. Prince. 1989. ”Swedish VP-Topicalization and Yiddish verb-Topicalization”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12(1). 47–58.10.1017/S033258650000192XSearch in Google Scholar

Karimi, S. 2003. “Focus movement and uninterpretable features”. In: Carnie, A., H. Harley and M. Willie (eds.), Formal approaches to function in grammar: In honor of Eloise Jelinek. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 297-306.10.1075/la.62.21karSearch in Google Scholar

Kayne, R.S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kiss, K.É. 1995. “Introduction: In: K.É. Kiss (ed.), Discourse configurational languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3–27.Search in Google Scholar

Kiss, K.É. 1998. “Identificational focus versus information focus”. Language 74. 245–273.10.1353/lan.1998.0211Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, A. and E. Selkirk. 2007. „Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs”. The Linguistic Review 24(2–3). 93–135.10.1515/TLR.2007.005Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, H. 1995. “Case and expletives revisited: On Greed and other human failings”. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 615–633.Search in Google Scholar

Matushansky, O. 2006. “Head movement in linguistic theory”. Linguistic inquiry 37(1). 69–109.10.1162/002438906775321184Search in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, S. 2010. Why Agree? Why Move: Unifying Agreement-based and discourse configurational languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8116.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Molnárfi, L. 2007. “Focus(ing) from a typological perspective: On the discourse configurationality of West Germanic”. In: Winkler, S. and K. Schwabe (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 155–181.10.1075/la.100.10molSearch in Google Scholar

Nanousi, V., J. Masterson, J. Druks and M. Atkinson. 2006. “Interpretable vs. uninterpretable features: Evidence from six Greek-speaking agrammatic patients”. Journal of Neurolinguistics 19(3). 209–238.10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.11.003Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D. 1995 Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D. and E. Torrego. 2007. “The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features”. In: Wilkins, W. and S. Karimi (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 262–294.10.1075/la.101.14pesSearch in Google Scholar

Poletto, C. and J.Y. Pollock. 2004. “On the left periphery of some Romance wh-questions”. In; Rizzi, L. (ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures. 251–296.Search in Google Scholar

Radford, A. 2004. Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811319Search in Google Scholar

Radford, A. 2009. Analysing English sentences: A minimalist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801617Search in Google Scholar

Rezac, M. 2003. “The fine structure of cyclic Agree”. Syntax 6. 156–182.10.1111/1467-9612.00059Search in Google Scholar

Richards, N. 1997. What moves where when in which language? (Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.)Search in Google Scholar

Richards, N. 1998. “The principle of minimal compliance”. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4). 599–629.10.1162/002438998553897Search in Google Scholar

Richards, N. 1999. “Featural cyclicity and the ordering of multiple specifiiers”. In: Epstein, S.D. and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 127–158.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, N. 2001. Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, N. 2002. “Lowering and cyclicity: Attraction by X from Spec XP”. Proceedings of NELS 32(2). 487–498.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, N. and A. Simpson. 1998. “What moves where when in which language?” Glot International 3(7). 11–14.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1997. “The fine structure of the left periphery”. In: Hageman, L. (ed.), Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 281–337.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 2001. “On the position ‘Int(errogative)’ in the left periphery of the clause”. Current Studies in Italian Syntax 14. 267–296.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 2004. “Locality and left periphery. Structures and beyond”. In: Belletti, A. (ed.), The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 223–251.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 2012. “Delimitation effects and the cartography of the left periphery”. In: Grewendorf, G. and T.E. Zimmermann (eds.), Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories. Berlin: De Gruyter. 115–147.10.1515/9781614511601.115Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 2013. “Notes on cartography and further explanation”. International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 25(1). 197–226.10.1515/probus-2013-0010Search in Google Scholar

Rudin, C. 1998. “On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 445–501.10.1007/BF00134489Search in Google Scholar

Safir, K. 2005. “Introducing exxtension”. In: The Proceedings of the Fifth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. 1–31.Search in Google Scholar

Schwabe, K. 2004. “The particle li and the left periphery of Slavic yes/no interrogatives”. In: Lohnstein, H. and Susanne Trissler (eds.), The syntax and semantics of the left periphery. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 385–430.10.1515/9783110912111.385Search in Google Scholar

Schwabe, K. and S. Winkler (eds.). 2007. On information structure, meaning and form: Generalizations across languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.100Search in Google Scholar

Struckmeier, V. 2014. “Ja doch wohl C? Modal particles in German as C-related elements”. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 16–48.10.1111/stul.12019Search in Google Scholar

Svenonius, P. 2006. “Interpreting uninterpretable features”. Linguistic Analysis 33. 375–413.Search in Google Scholar

Travis, L. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. (Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.)Search in Google Scholar

Westergaard, M.R. and Ø.A. Vangsnes. 2005. „Wh-questions, V2, and the left periphery of three Norwegian dialect types”. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8(1–2). 117–158.10.1007/s10828-004-0292-1Search in Google Scholar

Zeller, J. 2001. Particle verbs and local domains. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.41Search in Google Scholar

Zerbian, S. 2007. “Subject/object-asymmetry in Northern Sotho”. In: Schwabe, K. and S. Winkler eds.), On information structure, meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 323–343.10.1075/la.100.18zerSearch in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, M. 2004. “Discourse particles in the left periphery”. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35(2). 543–566.10.21248/zaspil.35.2004.241Search in Google Scholar