Abstract
The paper investigated learner attitudes to two major pronunciation models in EFL instruction at the university level: GB (General British) and GA (General American). It focused on four dimensions that are central to developing language attitudes: affective, linguistic, pragmatic and socio-cultural. Based on a survey conducted among 100 Polish students majoring in English (half of them trained in GB, the other half in GA), the study aimed to establish a hierarchy of these dimensions to determine which of them is/are key to shaping positive attitudes to the target variety. Of additional interest was how the students viewed the alternative pronunciation model. The study also sought to determine the degree of correlation between the aforementioned dimensions. The survey found that both varieties were assessed most favorably on the affective dimension. Overall, as the target variety, GB was rated more positively than GA; however, stronger correlations between the dimensions were observed among the GA learners.
6 Acknowledgments
I wish to thank Dr. hab. Magdalena Wrembel (Faculty of English, AMU), Dr. Victoria Kamasa (Institute of Linguistics, AMU) and Dr. hab. Włodzimierz Lapis (Institute of Linguistics, AMU) for the helpful comments and hints that they offered at various stages of this study. Thanks also go to the anonymous reviewers of the manuscript for the insightful remarks and suggestions that have made their way into the final version of this paper. Naturally, I alone am responsible for any errors or shortcomings.
References
Axelsson, M.W. 2002. “‘Refined’ or ‘relaxed’ English pronunciation: Usage and attitudes among Swedish university students. In: Modiano, M. (ed.), Studies in mid- Atlantic English. Gävle: Högskolan i Gävle. 132–146.Search in Google Scholar
Baker, C. 1992. Attitudes and language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar
Carrie, E. 2016. “‘British is professional, American is urban’: attitudes towards English reference accents in Spain”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics.10.1111/ijal.12139Search in Google Scholar
Cenoz, J. and M.L. García Lecumberri. 1999. “The acquisition of English pronunciation: Learners’ views”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 9(1). 3–17.10.1111/j.1473-4192.1999.tb00157.xSearch in Google Scholar
Cheng, K.S.K. 2013. “Survey of young educated Hong Kong people’s attitudes towards British English and American English: Comparing differences by tertiary learning experiences”. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences 12(1). 1–36.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. 2014. Gimson’s pronunciation of English. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203784969Search in Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., G. Kaltenboeck and U. Smit. 1997. “Learner attitudes and L2 pronunciation in Austria”. World Englishes 16(1). 115–128.10.1111/1467-971X.00052Search in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., J. Weckwerth and J. Zborowska. 1999. “Teaching phonetics at the School of English, AMU, Poznań, Poland”. In: Maidment, J.A. and E. Estebas (eds.), Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, UCL, April 14–15, 1999. London: University College London. 31–34.Search in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., K. Janicka, M. Kul, S. Scheuer, J. Weckwerth and D. Wolfram- Romanowska. 2006. “Native standards or non-native ELF: Which English to teach in the 21st century?” In: Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. (ed.), IFAtuation: A life in IFA. A festschrift for Professor Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of his 70th birthday. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. 235–259.Search in Google Scholar
Eurobarometer. 2012. Europeans and their languages. <http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf> (Last accessed 30 Oct 2016.)Search in Google Scholar
Gardner, R. and W. Lambert. 1972. Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Henderson, A., D. Frost, E. Tergujeff, A. Kautzsch, D. Murphy, A. Kirkova-Naskova, E. Waniek-Klimczak, D. Levey, U. Cuningham and L. Curnick. 2012. “The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: Selected results”. Research in Language 10(1). 5–27.10.2478/v10015-011-0047-4Search in Google Scholar
Janicka, K., M. Kul and J. Weckwerth. 2005. “Polish students’ attitudes to native English accents as models for EFL pronunciation”. In: Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. and J. Przedlacka (eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene. Bern: Peter Lang. 251–292.Search in Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2000. The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kasztalska, A. 2014. “English in contemporary Poland”. World Englishes 33(2). 242– 262.10.1111/weng.12083Search in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 2000. American English: An introduction. Peterborough: Broadway Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kubota, R. 1998. “Ideologies of English in Japan”. World Englishes 17(3). 295–306.10.1111/1467-971X.00105Search in Google Scholar
Ladegaard, H.J. 1998. “National stereotypes and language attitudes: The perception of British, American and Australian language and culture in Denmark”. Language & Communication 18. 251–274.10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00008-1Search in Google Scholar
Mańczak-Wohlfeld, E. 2002. “Poland”. In: Görlach, M. (ed.). English in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 213–228.Search in Google Scholar
Mompeán González, J.A. 2004. “Options and criteria for the choice of an English pronunciation model in Spain”. In: Anderson, J., J.M. Oro Cabanas and J.V. Zapata (eds.), Linguistic perspectives from the classroom: Language teaching in a multicultural Europe. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. 243–259.Search in Google Scholar
Paunović, T. 2009. “Plus ça change… Serbian EFL students’ attitudes towards varieties of English”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45(4). 511–533.10.2478/v10010-009-0027-1Search in Google Scholar
Preston, D.R. 2005. “How can you learn a language that isn’t there?” In: Dziubalska- Kołaczyk, K. and J. Przedlacka (eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene. Bern: Peter Lang. 37–58.Search in Google Scholar
Rindal, U. 2010. “Constructing identity with L2: pronunciation and attitudes among Norwegian learners of English”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(2). 240–261.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00442.xSearch in Google Scholar
Sobkowiak, W. 2002. “English speech in Polish eyes: What university students think about English pronunciation teaching and learning”. In: Waniek-Klimczak, E. and J.Melia (eds.), Accents and speech in teaching English phonetics and phonology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 177–195.Search in Google Scholar
Sobkowiak, W. 2005. “Why not LFC?” In: Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. and J. Przedlacka (eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene. Bern: Peter Lang. 131– 149.Search in Google Scholar
Stasiak, S. and J. Szpyra-Kozłowska. 2004. “Comprehension of RP and GA by intermediate Polish learners”. Zeszyty Naukowe PWSZ w Koninie 1/2004 (4). 108–115.Search in Google Scholar
Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. 2004. “Jaki model wymowy angielskiej? Dyskusji ciąg dalszy”. Zeszyty Naukowe PWSZ w Koninie 1/2004 (4). 116–123.Search in Google Scholar
Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. 2005. “Lingua Franca Core, phonetic universals and the Polish context”. In: Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. and J. Przedlacka (eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene. Bern: Peter Lang. 151–176.Search in Google Scholar
Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. 2014. Pronunciation in EFL instruction: A research-based approach. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783092628Search in Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 2001. “The sociolinguistics of modern RP”. In: Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation and change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 171–180.Search in Google Scholar
Waniek-Klimczak, E. 1997. “Context for teaching English phonetics and phonology at Polish universities and colleges: A survey”. In: Waniek-Klimczak, E. (ed.), Teaching English phonetics and phonology II. Accents ’97. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. 5–17.Search in Google Scholar
Waniek-Klimczak, E. 2002. “Context for teaching English phonetics and phonology”. In: Waniek-Klimczak, E. and J. Melia (eds.), Accents and speech in teaching English phonetics and phonology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 139–152.Search in Google Scholar
Waniek-Klimczak, E. and K. Klimczak. 2005. “Target in speech development: Learners’ views”. In: Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. and J. Przedlacka (eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene. Bern: Peter Lang. 251–292.Search in Google Scholar
Wells, J.C. 1982. Accents of English. (Vol. 2: The British Isles.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611759Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Bilingual development of theta in a child
- How will text size influence the length of its linguistic constituents?
- The dimensions of learner attitudes to general british and general american: a survey-based study
- Derived Imperfective Tensing in Kurpian
- Analysing intersubjective resources in Persian and English newspaper opinion/editorials
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Bilingual development of theta in a child
- How will text size influence the length of its linguistic constituents?
- The dimensions of learner attitudes to general british and general american: a survey-based study
- Derived Imperfective Tensing in Kurpian
- Analysing intersubjective resources in Persian and English newspaper opinion/editorials