Startseite Nominal ellipsis and prepositional modifiers in Portuguese: a phase-theoretic approach
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Nominal ellipsis and prepositional modifiers in Portuguese: a phase-theoretic approach

  • Eduardo P. Raposo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 21. Juli 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Probus
Aus der Zeitschrift Probus Band 30 Heft 2

Abstract

Definite determiners in Portuguese are (pro)clitics. As such, they must attach to a full prosodic word at PF. This is achieved by an operation which “fuses” the determiner to the following lexical item. In anaphoric DPs with an elliptical noun modified by a prepositional phrase, fusion to a full preposition (P*) is not possible. This is accounted for by claiming that P*Ps are phases that are sent to Spell-Out as soon as they are formed (“early Spell-Out”); thus, they will not be accessible to fusion with the definite article at the phonological cycle of the higher phase and the derivation crashes because the definite article is not included in a prosodic word. PPs with the dummy preposition de ‘of’ can modify elliptical nouns since dummy de is arguably a morphological reflex of inherent Case assigned by the (elliptical) noun; thus, it does not constitute a phase together with its NP complement. The analysis is then extended to cases where the modifier of the elliptical noun is a clause.

References

Barbosa, Pilar. 1996. Clitic Placement in European Portuguese and the Position of Subjects. In Aaron Halpern & Arnold Zwicky (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena, 1–40. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Barbosa, Pilar. 2013. Subordinação Argumental Finita. In B. P. Eduardo, Maria Raposo, B. Fernanda, Maria Do Nascimento, Antónia C Da Mota, Maria Luisa Segura & Amália Mendes (eds.), Gramática do Português (2° Vol.), 1819–1897. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Suche in Google Scholar

Bianchi, Valentina. 2000. The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: A Reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry 31(1). 123–140.10.1162/002438900554316Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995a. Bare Phrase Structure. In Hector Campos & Paula Kempchinsky (eds.), Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory: Studies in Honor of Carlos P. Otero, 51–109. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995b. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1993. The Theory of Principles and Parameters. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim Von Stechov, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110095869.1.9.506Suche in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Guimarães, Max. 1998. Repensando a Interface Sintaxe-Fonologia a partir do Axioma de Correspondência Linear. M.A. Dissertation. Campinas: Unicamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Alex Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel J Keyser (eds.), The View From Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hernanz, Ma. Lluisa & José Ma. Brucart. 1987. La Sintaxis: 1. Principios Teóricos. La Oración Simple. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.Suche in Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert & David Lightfoot. 1981. Introduction. In Norbert Hornstein & David Lightfoot (eds.), Explanation in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition, 9–31. London and New York: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Llombart, Amàlia. 2002. Anaphoric One and NP-Ellipsis. Studia Linguistica 56(1). 59–89.10.1111/1467-9582.00087Suche in Google Scholar

Llombart, Amàlia. 2003. Nominal Anaphora in Spanish and English. PhD Dissertation. Santa Barbara: UCSBSuche in Google Scholar

Martins, Ana Maria. 2013. Posição dos Pronomes Pessoais Clíticos. In B. P. Eduardo, Maria Raposo, B. Fernanda, Maria Do Nascimento, Antónia C. Da Mota, Maria Luisa Segura & Amália Mendes (eds.), Gramática do Português (2° Vol.), 2231–2302. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Suche in Google Scholar

Otero, Carlos. 1996. Head movement, Cliticization, Precompilation and Word Insertion (Comments on Uriagereka’s Paper). In Robert Freidin (ed.), Current Issues in Comparative Grammar, 296–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-0135-3_14Suche in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul. 1969. On So-called “Pronouns” in English. In David. A Reibel & Sanford A Schane (eds.), Modern Studies in English: Readingsin Transformational Grammar, 201–224. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Suche in Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K & Rodney Huddleston. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Suche in Google Scholar

Raposo, Eduardo. 1973. Sobre a Forma o em Português. Boletim de Filologia XXII. 361–415.Suche in Google Scholar

Raposo, Eduardo. 1987a. Case Theory and Infl-to-Comp: The Inflected Infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 18(1). 85–109.Suche in Google Scholar

Raposo, Eduardo. 1987b. Romance Infinitival Clauses and Case Theory. In Carol Neidle & Rafael Nuñez-Cedeño (eds.), Studies in Romance Languages, 237–249. Dordrecht: Foris.Suche in Google Scholar

Raposo, Eduardo. 1998. Some Observations on the Pronominal System of Portuguese. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics Vol.6. 59–93.Suche in Google Scholar

Raposo, Eduardo. 2002. Nominal Gaps with Prepositional Modifiers in Spanish and Portuguese. Cuadernos de Linguística IX, Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset. 127–144.Suche in Google Scholar

Raposo, Eduardo. 2010. Clitic Placement in Romance: A Phase-Theoretic Approach. In Donna B Gerdts, John C Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Hypothesis A/Hypothesis B: Linguistic Explorations in Honor Of David M. Perlmutter, 401–425. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7670.003.0024Suche in Google Scholar

Raposo, Eduardo & Juan Uriagereka. 2005. Clitic Placement in Western Iberian: A Minimalist View. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, 639–697. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Raposo, Eduardo & Maria Francisca Xavier. 2013. Preposição e Sintagma Preposicional. In B. P. Eduardo, Maria Raposo, B. Fernanda, Maria Do Nascimento, Antónia C Da Mota, Maria Luisa Segura & Amália Mendes (eds.), Gramática do Português (2° Vol.), 1497–1556. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Suche in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple Spell-Out. In Samuel Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism, 251–282. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7305.003.0012Suche in Google Scholar

Vigário, Marina. 2003. The Prosodic Word in European Portuguese. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110900927Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-07-21
Published in Print: 2018-08-28

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 30.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/probus-2018-0004/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen