Startseite Study of oxaliplatin penetration into ovaries of patients treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases of colorectal and appendiceal origin using mass spectrometry imaging
Artikel Open Access

Study of oxaliplatin penetration into ovaries of patients treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases of colorectal and appendiceal origin using mass spectrometry imaging

  • Marion Larroque , Sandra Mounicou ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Olivia Sgarbura ORCID logo , Carine Arnaudguilhem , Lucie Rebel , Cristina Leaha , Pierre-Arnaud Faye , Christine Enjalbal , François Quénet , Brice Bouyssiere und Sébastien Carrere EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 24. März 2021

Abstract

Objectives

Platinum salts are commonly used in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for digestive tract cancer treatment. During HIPEC with oxaliplatin for peritoneal metastases (PMs) treatment, the ovaries are directly exposed to the drug, questioning about ovarian resection and the potential impact of the drug on ovarian functionality, especially in young women of childbearing age. The goal of this work is to understand unwanted damages to the ovaries during HIPEC therapy by the determination of the concentration and distribution of platinum in ovaries in order to address its potential toxicity.

Methods

Mass spectrometry imaging techniques, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP MS), were used to study the penetration of oxaliplatin in ovaries after HIPEC treatment.

Results

MALDI-MS allowed the localization of an oxaliplatin-derivative (m/z 456.2) at the periphery of the ovaries. The quantitative LA-ICP MS maps confirmed the localization of elemental platinum as well as in the central part of ovaries from patients who received a previous platinum salt-based chemotherapy.

Conclusions

LA-ICP MS images showed that platinum diffusion was extended in cases of previous systemic treatment, questioning about platinum derivatives gonado-toxicity when combining the two treatments.

Introduction

Peritoneal metastases (PMs) represent a frequent extension pathway of digestive cancers. Colorectal and appendicular neoplasias are frequent primary sites in Western populations. PMs are a frequent extension of colorectal cancer (CRC) (15%) due to the dissemination of tumoral digestive tract cells through the peritoneum. Before the 1980s, the treatment of PM primarily consisted of palliative management using systemic chemotherapy. From the 1990s, cytoreductive surgery supplemented with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) [1] offered a survival benefit and potential access to a cure in select patients [2].

Maximal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by HIPEC has become the standard of care for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) and an option for digestive tract PM [3]. The recent results of the Prodige7 trial [4] on CRC treatments stressed the role of complete surgery but diminished the frequency of indications for HIPEC. Nevertheless, HIPEC remains an option depending on the time of the diagnosis, the extent and subtype of the disease [5] and the patient’s geographical location [6].

PMs are mostly diagnosed in patients older than 55 years, but these tumors also affect young female patients who wish to have children. Therefore, the preservation of their fertility must be considered. Recent therapeutic advances significantly improved the prognosis of these patients [7] and facilitate the re-examination of the question of fertility. Advances in medically assisted procreation in oncology are a popular topic [8], [9], [10]. The actual surgical procedure for PM from the digestive tract in women recommends bilateral adnexectomy, which leaves scarce options for pregnancy because ovarian metastases are present in 52% of patients with CRS for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin [11], [12].

Rare cases of spontaneous pregnancies were reported after peritoneal malignancies and were treated with CRS and intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin [13] or HIPEC with cisplatin or mitomycin C [14], [15].

Oxaliplatin (derived from platinum salts) is currently a molecule of choice in the treatment of CRC. Apart from the FOLFOX protocol, oxaliplatine is also used in triplets or doublets with targeted agents in the induction treatment of metastatic colorectal disease [16], [17], [18]. This efficacy promoted it as a first-choice drug for HIPEC in PM of colorectal [19] or gastric [20] origin, and it is one of the prominent options for PMP [21].

Intravenous oxaliplatin showed a moderate risk of gonadotoxicity via alteration of follicular maturation and reduction in the reserve of primordial follicles [22]. However, the diffusion of oxaliplatin into the ovary during HIPEC was not investigated and, in regard of the enhanced cytotoxic effect of OX-HIPEC on PM [23] we hypothesize that this cytotoxic effect could also be deleterious for ovarian functions.

We previously used sensitive and resolutive imaging technologies, such as matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MS) alone [24] or in combination with laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry imaging (LA-ICP MS) [25] and evaluated the penetration of platinum drugs into samples of PM of colorectal origin.

The present study localized and quantified the amount of complexed and metallic platinum (Pt) present in the ovaries of patients before and after HIPEC for PM of CRC origin using MALDI-MS and LA-ICP MS imaging. This study even recruiting post-menopausal women will allow us to get valuable information and the ethical background necessary to engage further studies on ovaries of pre-menopausal women that contribute to our understanding of the functional gonadotoxicity of oxaliplatin within a HIPEC protocol.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

The patients included in the study were women treated at the Montpellier Cancer Institute between January 2016 and December 2017 for a cancer of digestive origin for which the treatment of the peritoneum consisted of complete cytoreductive surgery (CCR) and an oxaliplatin-based HIPEC in the case neoplasia of appendiceal and colorectal origin. Patients were treated with an oxaliplatin-based systemic chemotherapy months before HIPEC. Morphological and macroscopic examination of the ovaries revealed no extraperitoneal or metastatic ovarian disease. Case selection was based on the principle that each patient was her own control. Patients with one or no ovaries were excluded. For this prospective study, all patients gave written informed consent before the procedure, and the Institutional Review Board approved the study, which was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975.

Surgical procedures and HIPEC treatment

All patients received the standard treatment at the time for PM of digestive tract cancer origin, which consisted of CCR followed by oxaliplatin-based HIPEC using the coliseum (open) technique. As with any peritoneal surgical procedure, an exhaustive exploration of the abdominal cavity was performed to assess the extent of the disease based on the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) [26]. The macroscopic aspect of the ovaries was evaluated during this operation. If the ovaries appeared healthy macroscopically and CRS and the HIPEC procedure were feasible, then one ovary was removed before IP oxaliplatin treatment. The contralateral ovary was resected at the end of the HIPEC protocol. Only oxaliplatin was administered intraperitoneally at a temperature of 42 ± 1 °C throughout the abdominal cavity over 30 min at 250 or 460 mg oxaliplatin/m2. The choice of chemotherapy dose was based on histological type, PCI score, and comorbidities.

Histological characterization

Ovaries resected from patients before and after HIPEC were transferred to the Department of Pathology for examination, and cross-sections of 3 mm in the central part of the ovary in its larger transverse axis were made from one-half frozen ovary for mass spectrometry imaging. The other half was fixed with paraformaldehyde before inclusion in paraffin for histological tissue staining. The same expert pathologist (CL) analyzed all pathological specimens using conventional hematoxylin-eosin-saffron stained microscopy.

MALDI-MS imaging

Eight-micron-thin sections were created from frozen tissue using a Microm HM 550 Thermo Scientific cryotome (Microm International GmbH, Walldorf, Germany) at −18 °C for the specimen and −20 °C for the chamber. Sections were deposited onto a MALDI stainless steel support and allowed to thaw under vacuum desiccation for 1 h. Immediately before MALDI-MS analysis, an α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (LaserBioLabs, France) matrix (5 mg ml−1 in CH3CN/H2O, 70/30 (V/V)) was sprayed onto the tissue section using a SunCollect SunChrom sprayer. MALDI-MS images were acquired on the RapifleX Analyzer (Bruker, Germany), and data were processed using FlexImaging software (MSI imaging, Bruker). Ovarian section imaging was performed under linear positive mode in the mass range of m/z 200–1,000 with a spatial resolution of 100 µm and laser intensity at 40% of full laser power. At each position of the tissue section, an averaged mass spectrum was generated from 800 consecutive laser shots.

LA-ICP MS imaging

Eight micron-thick tissue slices were created as described for MALDI-MS imaging but deposited onto a glass slide. The surface of the slide was modified for platinum (Pt) quantification purposes. Briefly, Pt quantification was performed via the development of concentration calibration standards [27]. The limit of detection reached 0.1 ng mg−1 for Pt. Standards and ovary thin sections were sampled using a laser ablation system (NWR213, ESI, Freemont, CA) coupled to an ICP MS (7700cs model, Agilent Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). Samples were ablated using a 75 × 75 µm laser beam, a 55 μm s−1 scan speed, a 20 Hz laser shot repetition rate and a laser fluency (energy) of ca. 3.5 J cm−2. The laser aerosol was transported with 800 mL He.min−1 toward the ICP MS where 194Pt, 195Pt and the internal standard (115In) were detected at each pixel position in the sample. Homemade software using the Python programming language (www.python.org) was used to generate images of element concentrations per pixel using a color code.

Results

Patients

Six patients were included in the study with a median age of 57.7 years (range 51–68), and all patients were in menopausal hormonal status. Four of them were treated for colorectal adenocarcinoma (ADK), and two patients were treated for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN). The patients treated for ADK received at least one oxaliplatin-based FOLFOX induction chemotherapy prior to HIPEC. No other known associated disease was reported for all patients. Patients’ characteristics and treatments are listed in Table 1.

Table 1:

Clinical data of patients and oxaliplatin-based treatment.

Patient acronymAge, yearsPathology originPeritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI)Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cycle number)HIPEC [oxaliplatin], mg/m2
P151Colorectal adenocarcinoma0FOLFOXOxaliplatin 250
P259Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm0NoneOxaliplatin 250
P353Colorectal adenocarcinoma2FOLFOXOxaliplatin 250
P463Colorectal adenocarcinoma with hepatic metastasis16FOLFOX (×2) TOMOX (×4)Oxaliplatin 250
P552Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm13NoneOxaliplatin 460
P668Colorectal adenocarcinoma3FOLFOX (×3)Oxaliplatin 460
  1. PCI, peritoneal cancer index according to Jacquet [26]; HIPEC, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Clinical features of ovaries

Histological analyses of the set of slices taken from the ovaries of six patients did not show metastatic lesions. These were post-menopausal ovaries with a flattened surface epithelium, a cortex with different levels of stromal proliferation that comprised a dense subepithelial network rich in reticulin and collagen (albuginea), albican bodies and a highly vascularized medullary. The studied slices revealed a cortex of variable thickness in relation to the stromal proliferation and a 200 µm thick tunica albuginea. Neither pathological features nor difference in the stromal density were noted for patients with a history of systemic chemotherapy compared with the rest of the group.

MALDI-MS imaging

We analyzed ovaries collected from patients P1 and P2. Both received the same HIPEC protocol (250 mg/m2), but patient P1 received systemic FOLFOX chemotherapy before surgery. The MALDI-MS images (Figure 1) revealed the distribution of a platinum complex, which was evidenced by the triplet mass signature at m/z 456.21, 457.21, and 458.21 (Figure 1A), which corresponded to ions comprising the 194, 195, and 196 platinum isotopes, respectively. The exact co-localization of their masses and the abundance of the isotopic ratio demonstrated that this mass spectrum signal issued from a platinum-containing compound. The platinum-containing entity did not penetrate the tissue of the tunica albuginea, as shown in the ovaries from patients P1 and P2 (Figure 1B, C, right). No platinum derivative was detected in the contralateral ovary resected before HIPEC (Figure 1B, C, left). Our analytical conditions revealed no other platinum signature (mass triplet) for the tissue, which means that no other form of platinum compound was detected using these MALDI ionization conditions.

Figure 1: MALDI-MS images.(A) Identification by MALDI mass spectrum of isotope-specific platinum compounds in tissues at m/z 456.2, 457.2, and 458.2, which correspond to platinum isotopes 194, 195, and 196. The presence of platinum is demonstrated by the exact co-localization of the masses of the three signals from each platinum isotope as illustrated by the merged resulting picture (right panel). Panels (B) and (C): localization of an oxaliplatin complex in a slice of ovaries from patients P1 and P2 before (left) and after HIPEC (right).
Figure 1:

MALDI-MS images.

(A) Identification by MALDI mass spectrum of isotope-specific platinum compounds in tissues at m/z 456.2, 457.2, and 458.2, which correspond to platinum isotopes 194, 195, and 196. The presence of platinum is demonstrated by the exact co-localization of the masses of the three signals from each platinum isotope as illustrated by the merged resulting picture (right panel). Panels (B) and (C): localization of an oxaliplatin complex in a slice of ovaries from patients P1 and P2 before (left) and after HIPEC (right).

LA-ICP MS imaging

Tissues sections from the ovaries of six patients collected before and after HIPEC were analyzed using LA-ICP MS imaging. Figure 2 shows that the LA-ICP MS imaging of the ovaries confirmed the findings from the MALDI-MS imaging that elemental platinum after HIPEC was localized in the tunica albuginea of all patients’ ovaries in concentrations ranging from 5 to greater than 20 ng mg−1 per pixel. Notably, LA-ICP MS imaging also revealed the presence of platinum compounds deeper in the ovary structure of patients after HIPEC. The concentration in the internal structures was estimated at 4–10 ng mg−1 after HIPEC (P1, P3, P4, P6), but remained undetectable in patients P2 and P5 (Figure 2, right panel). Elemental platinum was also detected as traces (<2 ng mg−1) in ovaries collected before HIPEC in patients P1, P3, P4, and P6.

Figure 2: LA-ICP MS quantitative images of cryosections of the ovaries of the six patients.For each patient, the LA-ICP MS localization of elemental platinum (195Pt) is illustrated before (left panel) and after (right panel) HIPEC. For each tissue, the hematoxylin/eosin staining of the immediate adjacent slice is presented at the right of the LA-ICP MS picture. Note that no platinum was detected before HIPEC in the ovaries of patients P2 and P5. Color scale on the right from 0 to 20 ng mg−1 Pt applies to all pictures. Note that for patient P2 after HIPEC treatment, the signal (of ca. 500 ng mg−1) in the core of the ovarian elemental image is due to an analytical artifact.
Figure 2:

LA-ICP MS quantitative images of cryosections of the ovaries of the six patients.

For each patient, the LA-ICP MS localization of elemental platinum (195Pt) is illustrated before (left panel) and after (right panel) HIPEC. For each tissue, the hematoxylin/eosin staining of the immediate adjacent slice is presented at the right of the LA-ICP MS picture. Note that no platinum was detected before HIPEC in the ovaries of patients P2 and P5. Color scale on the right from 0 to 20 ng mg−1 Pt applies to all pictures. Note that for patient P2 after HIPEC treatment, the signal (of ca. 500 ng mg−1) in the core of the ovarian elemental image is due to an analytical artifact.

Discussion

Women who are about to undergo PM treatment have various options when it comes to fertility preservation, such as embryo, oocytes as well as ovarian tissue cryopreservation [28], [29]. However in some case, these options need to delay the chemotherapy or surgery and could compromise the success of the treatment. In such case, the direct fertility preservation during the chemotherapy must be considered. The present study is the first study to examine the ovarian penetration of hyperthermic IP oxaliplatin at doses of 250 or 460 mg/m2 for an exposure time of 30 min and to consider fertility preservation in women of childbearing age with low-grade neoplasia. An international survey in 2011 collected data of pregnancies in women who underwent CRS with HIPEC and adnexal preservation [14]. Only seven cases of spontaneous pregnancies were reported after HIPEC using cisplatin or mitomycin C as the cytotoxic agent. Five of them were treated for PMP, and two cases were treated for peritoneal mesothelioma [14]. To our knowledge, no cases of pregnancy were communicated after HIPEC when oxaliplatin was used as the cytotoxic drug. The use of oxaliplatin and higher concentrations may be toxic to the ovaries that are not covered by the peritoneum and come in direct contact with the chemotherapy solution. Systematic adnexectomy may be questioned in cases of young women of childbearing age with low-grade neoplasia and low PCI. To make the best choice between the preservation of fertility and the possible extension of the disease to the preserved ovary [30], it is necessary to evaluate the impact of cytotoxic IP treatment on the ovary itself.

The detection and localization of drugs or metallic atoms in human tissues requires sensitive and resolutive imaging techniques, such as MALDI MS [24, 31, 32] or LA-ICP MS [25, 33, 34]. LA-ICP MS was used to localize elemental platinum in animal [35] and human tissues [25]. Our previous studies on the distribution of oxaliplatin-derived entities in tissues revealed that the drug penetrated only a few millimeters in animal tissue [24] and human PM nodules resected after the HIPEC procedure [25].

The present study used a mass spectrometry imaging approach to study possible “off-target” effects of the HIPEC protocol due to the diffusion of the platinum drug into an organ, the ovary, which is not the target of the therapy. The MALDI-MS images showed the distribution of a platinum entity. Although this platinum-containing molecule had the same nominal mass as methionine-oxaliplatin, this finding does not guarantee its identity because its structure must be studied using a more accurate method, such as Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR). As previously observed for other tissues [24], [25], this platinum-containing entity did not penetrate the tissue deeper than the tunica albuginea, as shown in the ovaries from patients P1 and P2.

LA-ICP MS imaging confirmed the findings of MALDI-MS imaging of the presence of platinum at the periphery of the ovaries from patients P1 and P2 after HIPEC. However, the detection of Pt derivatives in MALDI is strictly dependent on the ionization conditions, and the adjustment of many instrumental parameters is required for each imaged molecule because there is no generic protocol for analysis [31]. Although LA-ICP MS does not allow the determination of a chemical structure, its ionization mode (i.e., atomization of the platinum molecule first then ionization of platinum) enables a quantitative analysis via the detection of all platinum present in the sample. Therefore, the impregnation of a tissue by platinum derivatives may be assessed even for those hardly or not ionized in MALDI-MS and consequently not detected. Therefore, LA-ICP MS imaging provided a more complete picture of the platinum distribution inside the thin ovary sections, and the gain in instrumental sensitivity (limit of detection of 0.1 ng mg−1) and the quantitative data acquisition provided essential information. LA-ICP MS imaging detected Pt in all ovaries resected after HIPEC and showed that Pt penetrated more deeply than revealed by MALDI-MS. Platinum was detected in various concentrations ranging from 0 to 5 ng mg−1 in patients one, two, and five and from 0 to 20 ng mg−1 for patients three, four, and six. Our data showed that the distribution of platinum and its concentration were independent of the concentration of the chemotherapeutic bath. However, more intriguing was the difference in the Pt distribution in the ovaries of patients who received an intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy before HIPEC (P1, P3, P4, and P6) from patients who did not (P2, P5). Whereas Pt was detected in ovaries from patients that received previous adjuvant platinum chemotherapy, no Pt was detected before HIPEC in the ovaries of two patients who did not received this therapy. For these last two patients, the localization of Pt after HIPEC was restricted to the surrounding structure of the ovaries.

The history of platinum-based chemotherapy prior HIPEC was clearly evidenced by the Pt impregnation of the ovaries before HIPEC. In the ovaries of patients who received an intravenous oxaliplatin infusion, Pt was mostly distributed in the medulla before HIPEC because this substructure contains the blood vessels and nerves, and it is more irrigated by the blood flow than the tunica albuginea. Notably, platinum was not detected in the cortex just beneath the tunica albuginea. After HIPEC, Pt compounds were concentrated in the tunica albuginea and the cortex to a lesser extent for patients P1, P2, P4 and P5, but it was distributed more deeply in the medulla of the ovaries for patients who received prior adjuvant platinum chemotherapy than patients who did not receive treatment. The quantitative analysis showed that the penetration of Pt in ovaries during HIPEC was greatly enhanced by the systemic treatment, except for in patient P1, in whom this effect was less obvious. In the ovaries of patients P3, P4, and P6, the Pt concentration increased from 2 to 5 ng mg−1 before HIPEC to 10–20 ng mg−1 after HIPEC. Elemental Pt was not detected in the most blood-irrigated structure of ovary of patients that did not received systemic treatment, suggesting that the hematogeneous distribution of the drug during HIPEC remains minimal at the end of the time of the intervention.

The platinum-based chemotherapy protocol FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) administered prior HIPEC was clearly associated with a deeper Pt impregnation of the ovaries. In spite of the relatively small number of patients included in the study, the magnitude of the difference in Pt concentration in the deep areas of the ovary, which rises from undetectable in patients who did not receive systemic chemotherapy to a value as high as 20 ng mg−1 in those who did receive it, allows us to formulate an hypothesis but does not exclude random effects. From patient P4, for whom we had a complete treatment history, we observed that Pt persisted in the ovary at least one year after the systemic administration.

Few biological functions are concentrated in the tunica albuginea, where the Pt concentrated during the HIPEC of patients who did not receive a systemic treatment. We hypothesized that the HIPEC impact may be minimal on ovarian functions in these conditions. The deeper platinum penetration in the medulla that followed systemic treatments appeared to enhance the diffusion of platinum compounds in this structure during HIPEC. Finally, except for patient three, platinum penetration was less deep in the cortex, which consists of a very cellular connective tissue stroma in which the ovarian follicles are embedded. The observed potentiation of the drug penetration by intravenous systemic oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy may be considered in the decision to preserve fertility during the HIPEC treatment of the peritoneal extension of CRC.

Conclusions

We used mass spectrometry imaging and demonstrated the oxaliplatin derivative penetration into the ovaries of women treated with HIPEC for a PM extension of digestive cancers. LA-ICP MS imaging demonstrated the distribution of elemental platinum with greater sensitivity than MALDI-MS imaging, which made it possible to propose a molecular nominal mass for the oxaliplatinum complex. Notably, we found that the penetration into ovaries during HIPEC was strongly enhanced when patients received a systemic oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy before HIPEC. The relative preservation of the cortex vs. platinum penetration in patients that didn’t receive a systemic platinum based chemotherapy suggests that the functional properties of the ovaries may not be affected, but further functional studies are needed. PMP is the pathology that meets the combination of these conditions. The effects of systemic therapy preceding HIPEC on the penetration of the drug into targeted tissues and off-target organs must be more generally addressed to prevent side effects and enhance the tumor response to the treatment.


Corresponding author: Sandra Mounicou; Universite de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, E2S UPPA, CNRS, IPREM, Pau, France, Phone: +33 559407764, E-mail: ; and Sébastien Carrere, IRCM, INSERM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France; and Département Chirurgie Oncologique, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France, E-mail:

Funding source: Aquitaine Region and FEDER

Award Identifier / Grant number: 20131206001-13010973

Acknowledgments

We thank all of the participants for their contributions to this work. We thank the members of the LMP Laboratory of Montpellier University for access to the MALDI mass spectrometer. We also acknowledge Aquitaine Region and Feder for the funding of the laser ablation system through the AQUITRACE project (convention number 20131206001-13010973).

  1. Research funding: Aquitaine Region and Feder are acknowledged for the funding of the LA-ICP MS system under the AQUITRACE project (convention number 20131206001-13010973).

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. ML, SM, LR, BB, CE, OS and SC designed the work. OS, FQ and ML received the patients and performed the HIPEC protocol. ML and P-A F ran the tissue samples. CL made the pathological classification. ML acquired the MALDI images. SM and CA acquired the LA-ICP MS images. ML, SM, OS, and SC analyzed data and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: For this prospective study, all patients gave written informed consent before the procedure, and the Institutional Review Board approved the study, which was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975.

References

1. Sugarbaker, PH. Peritonectomy procedures. Ann Surg 1995;221:29–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199501000-00004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Verwaal, VJ, Bruin, S, Boot, H, van Slooten, G, van Tinteren, H. 8-year follow-up of randomized trial: cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:2426–32. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9966-2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Van Cutsem, E, Cervantes, A, Adam, R, Sobrero, A, Van Krieken, JH, Aderka, D, et al.. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2016;27:1386–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw235.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Quénet, F. Colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis: what is the future of HIPEC? Eur J Surg Oncol 2018;44:1847–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.009.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Abboud, K, André, T, Brunel, M, Ducreux, M, Eveno, C, Glehen, O, et al.. Management of colorectal peritoneal metastases: expert opinion. J Visc Surg 2019;156:377–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.08.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Bushati, M, Rovers, KP, Sommariva, A, Sugarbaker, PH, Morris, DL, Yonemura, Y, et al.. The current practice of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: results of a worldwide web-based survey of the peritoneal surface oncology group International (PSOGI). Eur J Surg Oncol 2018;44:1942–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.07.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Lavoue, V, Huchon, C, Akladios, C, Alfonsi, P, Bakrin, N, Ballester, M, et al.. Management of epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneum Long text of the joint French clinical practice guidelines issued by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, and GINECO-ARCAGY, and endorsed by INCa Part 1: diagnostic exploration and staging, surgery, perioperative care, and pathology. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2019;48:369–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.03.017.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Kim, SY, Kim, SK, Lee, JR, Woodruff, TK. Toward precision medicine for preserving fertility in cancer patients: existing and emerging fertility preservation options for women. J Gynecol Oncol 2016;27:e22. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e22.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Fisch, B. Abir R Female fertility preservation: past, present and future. Reproduction 2018;156:F11–27. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-17-0483.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Elias, D, Duchalais, E, David, A, Dartigues, P, Duvillard, P, Poirot, C, et al.. Comprehensive study of ovarian metastases in young women with peritoneal pseudomyxoma: is a preservation of fertility possible? Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:748–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Mori, Y, Nyuya, A, Yasui, K, Toshima, T, Kawai, T, Taniguchi, F, et al.. Clinical outcomes of women with ovarian metastases of colorectal cancer treated with oophorectomy with respect to their somatic mutation profiles. Oncotarget 2018;9:16477–88. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24735.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Evers, D, Verwaal, V. Indication for oophorectomy during cytoreduction for intraperitoneal metastatic spread of colorectal or appendiceal origin. Br J Surg 2011;98:287–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7303.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Smaldone, GM, Richard, SD, Krivak, TC, Kelley, JL3rd, Edwards, RP. Pregnancy after tumor debulking and intraperitoneal cisplatin for appendiceal carcinoid tumor. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:477–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000258785.00211.5d.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Ortega-Deballon, P, Glehen, O, Levine, E, Piso, P, Sugarbaker, PH, Hayes-Jordan, A, et al.. Childbearing after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: results from an international survey. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:2297–301. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1595-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Kyser, K, Bidus, MA, Rodriguez, M, Rose, GS, Elkas, JC. Spontaneous pregnancy following cytoreduction with peritonectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100:198–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.045.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Cremolini, C, Loupakis, F, Antoniotti, C, Lupi, C, Sensi, E, Lonardi, S, et al.. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:1306–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00122-9.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Douillard, JY, Siena, S, Cassidy, J, Tabernero, J, Burkes, R, Barugel, M, et al.. Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2014;25:1346–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu141.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Maughan, TS, Adams, RA, Smith, CG, Meade, AM, Seymour, MT, Wilson, RH, et al.. Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet 2011;377:2103–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60613-2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Prada-Villaverde, A, Esquivel, J, Lowy, AM, Markman, M, Chua, T, Pelz, J, et al.. The American society of peritoneal surface malignancies evaluation of HIPEC with mitomycin C versus oxaliplatin in 539 patients with colon cancer undergoing a complete cytoreductive surgery. J Surg Oncol 2014;110:779–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23728.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Bonnot, PE, Piessen, G, Kepenekian, V, Decullier, E, Pocard, M, Meunier, B, et al.. Cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases (CYTO-CHIP study): a propensity score analysis. J Clin Oncol 2019;37:2028–40. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.18.01688.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Marcotte, E, Dubé, P, Drolet, P, Mitchell, A, Frenette, S, Leblanc, G, et al.. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin as treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from the appendix and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a survival analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2014;12:332. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-332.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Franko, J, Ibrahim, Z, Gusani, N, Holtzman, M, Bartlett, D, Zeh, H. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion versus systemic chemotherapy alone for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer 2010;116:3756–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25116.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Levi, M, Shalgi, R, Brenner, B, Perl, G, Purim, O, Amit, L, et al.. The impact of oxaliplatin on the gonads: from bedside to the bench. Mol Hum Reprod 2015;21:885–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gav055.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Bouslimani, A, Bec, N, Glueckmann, M, Hirtz, C, Larroque, C. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry of oxaliplatin derivatives in heated intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC)-like treated rat kidney. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2010;24:415–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4408.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Bianga, J, Bouslimani, A, Bec, N, Quenet, F, Mounicou, S, Szpunar, J, et al.. Complementarity of MALDI and LA ICP mass spectrometry for platinum anticancer imaging in human tumor. Metallomics 2014;6:1382–6. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4mt00131a.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Jacquet, P, Sugarbaker, PH. Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Canc Treat Res 1996;82:359–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1247-5_23.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Arnaudguilhem, C, Larroque, M, Sgarbura, O, Michau, D, Quenet, F, Carrere, S, et al.. Toward a comprehensive study for multielemental quantitative LA-ICP M S bioimaging in soft tissues. Talanta 2021;222:121537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121537.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. De Vos, M, Smitz, J, Woodruff, TK. Fertility preservation 2. Lancet 2014;384:1302–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60834-5.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Hussein, RS, Khan, Z, Zhao, Y. Fertility preservation in women: indications and options for therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 2020;95:770–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.10.009.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Elias, D, Duchalais, E, Dartigues, P, Duvillard, P, Poirot, C, Goéré, D. A new policy regarding ovarian resection in young women treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:1837–42. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2879-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Schulz, S, Becker, M, Groseclose, MR, Schadt, S, Hopf, C. Advanced MALDI mass spectrometry imaging in pharmaceutical research and drug development. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2019;55:51–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2018.08.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Buchberger, AR, DeLaney, K, Johnson, J, Li, L. Mass spectrometry imaging: a review of emerging advancements and future insights. Anal Chem 2018;90:240–65. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04733.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Cruz-Alonso, M, Fernandez, B, Navarro, A, Junceda, S, Astudillo, A, Pereiro, R. Laser ablation ICP-MS for simultaneous quantitative imaging of iron and ferroportin in hippocampus of human brain tissues with Alzheimer’s disease. Talanta 2019;197:413–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.01.056.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Ali, MHM, Rakib, F, Al-Saad, K, Al-Saady, R, Goormaghtigh, E. An innovative platform merging elemental analysis and ftir imaging for breast tissue analysis. Sci Rep 2019;9:9854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46056-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Moraleja, I, Moreno-Gordaliza, E, Esteban-Fernández, D, Mena, ML, Linscheid, MW, Gómez-Gómez, MM. A shotgun approach for the identification of platinum-protein complexes. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015;407:2393–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8452-x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-11-20
Accepted: 2021-02-25
Published Online: 2021-03-24

© 2021 Marion Larroque et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Heruntergeladen am 26.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pp-2020-0149/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen