Abstract
This work systematically studies the high strain rate impact behavior of shear thickening fluid (STF) treated carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. Two STFs were synthesized, with concentration of 15 wt% and 20 wt%, respectively. The findings shown that STF can considerably enhance the stress response and energy absorption performance of CFRP, and both exhibit obvious strain rate effects. With the rise in the concentration of STF, the peak stress and energy absorption further increase, reaching 32 % and 178 % of their maximum values, respectively. Additionally, the incorporation of 15 wt% STF significantly improved CFRP’s energy absorption efficiency, outperforming pure CFRP by factors of 1.62, 1.85, and 3.35 at various high strain rates. At a 20 wt% STF concentration, these values escalated to 2.75, 2.70, and 3.41, respectively. It is crucial to highlight that the observed enhancements are limited to high strain rate impacts. In contrast, under low strain rate conditions, STF reduces CFRP’s peak stress and energy absorption due to its lubricating effect. Consequently, CFRP-STF composites are more appropriate for environments with higher and faster impact loading, e.g. vehicle collisions and military applications.
Funding source: Projects of Talents Recruitment of GDUPT
Award Identifier / Grant number: XJ2024005201
Funding source: Hunan Provincial Department of Education Project
Award Identifier / Grant number: 18C0562
Funding source: Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2023JJ30492
Funding source: Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2025JJ70605
Funding source: Department of Education of Hunan Province
Award Identifier / Grant number: 24A0376
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: Guangpeng Zhang contributed significantly to the analysis and wrote the manuscript. Zhiping Huang contributed to the conception of the study; Wanjin Gu performed the data analyses. Minghai Wei helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: All other authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: This work was supported by the Hunan Provincial Department of Education Project [no. 18C0562], Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [no. 2023JJ30492], Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [no. 2025JJ70605] and Department of Education of Hunan Province [no. 24A0376], and Projects of Talents Recruitment of GDUPT (no. XJ2024005201).
-
Data availability: The relevant data can be made available by the corresponding authors on request.
References
1. Vivek, K. S.; Baskar, R.; Asha, B. CFRP Strengthening of Web Perforated CFS Lipped Channel Short Columns: An Experimental Study. Structures 2024, 61, 106075; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106075.Suche in Google Scholar
2. El Ghadioui, R.; Hiesch, D.; Bujotzek, L.; Proske, T.; Graubner, C. A. Structural Behaviour of CFRP Reinforced Concrete Members under Monotonic and Cyclic Long-Term Loading. Mater. Struct. 2021, 54 (4), 137; https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01728-4.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Je, P. C.; Sultan, M. T.; Selvan, C. P.; Irulappasamy, S.; Mustapha, F.; Basri, A. A.; Safri, S. N. Manufacturing Challenges in Self-Healing Technology for Polymer Composites–A Review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9 (4), 7370–7379; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.082.Suche in Google Scholar
4. Dolbeer, R. A.; Begier, M. J.; Miller, P. R.; Weller, J. R.; Anderson, A. L. Wildlife Strikes to Civil Aircraft in the United States, 1990–2019; Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration: United States, 2021.Suche in Google Scholar
5. Daelemans, L.; Cohades, A.; Meireman, T.; Beckx, J.; Spronk, S.; Kersemans, M.; De Baere, I.; Rahier, H.; Michaud, V.; Van Paepegem, W.; De Clerck, K. Electrospun Nanofibrous Interleaves for Improved Low Velocity Impact Resistance of Glass Fibre Reinforced Composite Laminates. Mater. Des. 2018, 141, 170–184; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.045.Suche in Google Scholar
6. Chee, S. S.; Jawaid, M.; Sultan, M.; Alothman, O. Y.; Abdullah, L. C. Effects of Nanoclay on Physical and Dimensional Stability of Bamboo/Kenaf/nanoclay Reinforced Epoxy Hybrid Nanocomposites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9 (3), 5871–5880; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.114.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Mariam, M.; Afendi, M.; Majid, M. A.; Ridzuan, M.; Azmi, A.; Sultan, M. Influence of Hydrothermal Ageing on the Mechanical Properties of an Adhesively Bonded Joint with Different Adherends. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2019, 165, 572–585.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.032Suche in Google Scholar
8. Gürgen, S.; Yıldız, T. Stab Resistance of Smart Polymer Coated Textiles Reinforced with Particle Additives. Compos. Struct. 2020, 235, 111812; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111812.Suche in Google Scholar
9. Khodadadi, A.; Liaghat, G.; Vahid, S.; Sabet, A.; Hadavinia, H. Ballistic Performance of Kevlar Fabric Impregnated with Nanosilica/PEG Shear Thickening Fluid. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2019, 162, 643–652; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.121.Suche in Google Scholar
10. Barhoumi, H.; Bhouri, N.; Feki, I.; Baffoun, A.; Hamdaoui, M.; Ben Abdessalem, S. Review of Ballistic Protection Materials: Properties and Performances. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2023, 42 (13-14), 685–699; https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844221137920.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Kaur, G.; Singh, K.; Verma, S. K. Effect of Titanium Diboride on the Rheological Characteristics of Silica-Based Polyethylene Glycol Shear Thickening Fluid. J. Polym. Eng. 2024, 44 (3), 155–161; https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2023-0169.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Astaraki, S.; Zamani, E.; Pol, M. H.; Hasan-nezhad, H. Investigating the Energy Absorption Properties of Sandwich Panels Filled with Shear Thickening Fluid with a Weight Fraction of 35% under Low-Velocity Impact. J. Compos. Mater. 2024, 58 (3), 361–375; https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983231225452.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Salman, S. D.; Leman, Z.; Sultan, M. T.; Ishak, M. R.; Cardona, F. Ballistic Impact Resistance of Plain Woven Kenaf/aramid Reinforced Polyvinyl Butyral Laminated Hybrid Composite. BioResources 2016, 11 (3), 7282–7295; https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.3.7282-7295.Suche in Google Scholar
14. Kaur, G.; Singh, K.; Verma, S. K. Investigate the Influence of GO as an Additive in the Silica-Based Polyethylene Glycol Shear Thickening Fluid on the Rheological Properties. J. Polym. Eng. 2024, 44 (8), 519–527; https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2024-0059.Suche in Google Scholar
15. Lee, Y. S.; Wetzel, E. D.; Wagner, N. J. The Ballistic Impact Characteristics of Kevlar® Woven Fabrics Impregnated with a Colloidal Shear Thickening Fluid. J. Mater. Sci. 2003, 38 (13), 2825–2833; https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024424200221.10.1023/A:1024424200221Suche in Google Scholar
16. Park, J. L.; Yoon, B. I.; Paik, J. G.; Kang, T. J. Ballistic Performance of P-Aramid Fabrics Impregnated with Shear Thickening Fluid; Part I - Effect of Laminating Sequence. Text. Res. J. 2012, 82 (6), 527–541; https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517511420753.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Park, J. L.; Yoon, B. I.; Paik, J. G.; Kang, T. J. Ballistic Performance of P-Aramid Fabrics Impregnated with Shear Thickening Fluid; Part II - Effect of Fabric Count and Shot Location. Text. Res. J. 2012, 82 (6), 542–557; https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517511420765.Suche in Google Scholar
18. Gong, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, W.; Xuan, S.; Jiang, W.; Jiang, W. Study of the Knife Stab and Puncture-Resistant Performance for Shear Thickening Fluid Enhanced Fabric. J. Compos. Mater. 2014, 48 (6), 641–657; https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998313476525.Suche in Google Scholar
19. Haris, A.; Lee, H.; Tay, T.; Tan, V. Shear Thickening Fluid Impregnated Ballistic Fabric Composites for Shock Wave Mitigation. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2015, 80, 143–151; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.02.008.Suche in Google Scholar
20. Baharvandi, H. R.; Alebooyeh, M.; Alizadeh, M.; Khaksari, P.; Kordani, N. Effect of Silica Weight Fraction on Rheological and Quasi-Static Puncture Characteristics of Shear Thickening Fluid-Treated Twaron (R) Composite. J. Ind. Text. 2016, 46 (2), 473–494; https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083715589750.Suche in Google Scholar
21. Lu, Z.; Jing, X.; Sun, B.; Gu, B. Compressive Behaviors of Warp-Knitted Spacer Fabrics Impregnated with Shear Thickening Fluid. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 88, 184–189; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.004.Suche in Google Scholar
22. Hasan-nezhad, H.; Yazdani, M.; Salami-Kalajahi, M.; Jeddi, M. Mechanical Behavior of 3D GFRP Composite with Pure and Treated Shear Thickening Fluid Matrix Subject to Quasi-Static Puncture and Shear Impact Loading. J. Compos. Mater. 2020, 64 (26), 3933–3948; https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998320922288.Suche in Google Scholar
23. Hasan-nezhad, H.; Yazdani, M.; Jeddi, M. High- and Low-Velocity Impact Experiments on Treated STF/3D Glass Fabrics. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022, 171, 108720; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108720.Suche in Google Scholar
24. Jeddi, M.; Yazdani, M.; Hasannezhad, H. Experimental Study on Puncture Resistance of 2D and 3D Glass Fabrics Reinforced with Shear Thickening Fluid (STF). AUT J. Mech. Eng. 2022, 6 (1), 3.Suche in Google Scholar
25. Wei, M.; Sun, L.; Zhu, J. Effects of Parameters Controlling the Impact Resistance Behavior of the GFRP Fabric Impregnated with a Shear Thickening Fluid. Mater. Des. 2020, 196, 109078; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109078.Suche in Google Scholar
26. Sun, L.; Wei, M.; Zhu, J. Low Velocity Impact Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Impregnated with Shear Thickening Fluid. Polym. Test. 2021, 96, 107095; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107095.Suche in Google Scholar
27. Fu, K.; Wang, H.; Chang, L.; Foley, M.; Friedrich, K.; Ye, L. Low-velocity Impact Behaviour of a Shear Thickening Fluid (STF) and STF-Filled Sandwich Composite Panels. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 165, 74–83; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.06.013.Suche in Google Scholar
28. Wu, X.; Xiao, K.; Yin, Q.; Zhong, F.; Huang, C. Experimental Study on Dynamic Compressive Behaviour of Sandwich Panel with Shear Thickening Fluid Filled Pyramidal Lattice Truss Core. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 138-139, 467–475; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.02.029.Suche in Google Scholar
29. Lim, J.; Kim, S.-W. Enhanced Damping Characteristics of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer–Based Shear Thickening Fluid Hybrid Composite Structures. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2020, 31 (20). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x19898769.Suche in Google Scholar
30. Wei, M.; Sun, L.; Gu, W. High Strain Rates Impact Performance of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Impregnated with Shear-Thickening Fluid. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7 (5), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7050208.Suche in Google Scholar
31. Hasannezhad, H.; Yazdani, M. Investigate the Dynamic Compressive (Cushioning) Response of 3D GFRP Composites when the STF Matrix Base Material Is Modified PEG. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 366, 120304; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120304.Suche in Google Scholar
32. Luo, S.; Wei, M.; Sun, L.; Yu, X.; Gu, W. High-strain-rate Response of GFRP Composites Impregnated with Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Shear Thickening Fluid. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2023, 30, 1477–1492; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-023-10131-x.Suche in Google Scholar
33. Singh, A.; Chauhan, P.; Mamatha, T. A Review on Tribological Performance of Lubricants with Nanoparticles Additives. Mater. Today: Proc. 2020, 25, 586–591; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.245.Suche in Google Scholar
34. Shafi, W. K.; Raina, A.; Ul Haq, M. I. Friction and Wear Characteristics of Vegetable Oils Using Nanoparticles for Sustainable Lubrication. Tribol. Mater. Surface Interfac. 2018, 12 (1), 27–43; https://doi.org/10.1080/17515831.2018.1435343.Suche in Google Scholar
35. Tan, P. J.; Harrigan, J. J.; Reid, S. R. Inertia Effects in Uniaxial Dynamic Compression of a Closed Cell Aluminium Alloy Foam. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2002, 18 (5), 480–488; https://doi.org/10.1179/026708302225002092.Suche in Google Scholar
36. Harris, J.; Winter, R.; McShane, G. Impact Response of Additively Manufactured Metallic Hybrid Lattice Materials. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2017, 104, 177–191; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.02.007.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Material Properties
- Impact behavior of shear thickening fluid treated CFRP by using SHPB technique
- Soft materials containing dynamic C–N bonds for fluorescence visualization
- Preparation and Assembly
- Advanced polymer nanocomposites in packaging applications
- Research and application advances in rubber flame retardant technology
- Silicone- and ester-containing polyurethanes with improved thermal stability
- Engineering and Processing
- Experimental study on the usage of biopolymer sodium alginate as drainage barrier in liners
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Material Properties
- Impact behavior of shear thickening fluid treated CFRP by using SHPB technique
- Soft materials containing dynamic C–N bonds for fluorescence visualization
- Preparation and Assembly
- Advanced polymer nanocomposites in packaging applications
- Research and application advances in rubber flame retardant technology
- Silicone- and ester-containing polyurethanes with improved thermal stability
- Engineering and Processing
- Experimental study on the usage of biopolymer sodium alginate as drainage barrier in liners