Home Physical Sciences Advanced polymer nanocomposites in packaging applications
Article Publicly Available

Advanced polymer nanocomposites in packaging applications

  • Varsha Srivastava , Sangeeta Garg and Amit D. Saran EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 6, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) have emerged as advanced materials for several crucial applications such as packaging, electronics, pharmaceuticals, construction and transportation. This review work explores the integration of various dispersible nanostructures or nanofillers in the polymeric matrix, and the resultant properties of the nanocomposites specially with respect to packaging applications. With an improved combination of mechanical, thermal, optical and barrier properties along with reduced environmental impact with biodegradable polymers, these PNCs offer durable and sustainable packaging solutions. A comprehensive summary of the recent research work on the preparation and relevant properties of eco-friendly and biodegradable polymer nanocomposites, is presented here with an emphasis on commercial applications. The versatility, enhanced functionalities, and potential for sustainable packaging render the PNCs as valuable materials in the packaging industry. Nanomaterials such as metal oxides, ceramics, carbon based, polymers and hybrids have been summarized for their exclusive characteristics including surface area, magnetic behavior, optical properties, and catalytic activity. These nanofillers dispersed in various polymeric structures have been reported in a wide range of industrial and environmental applications. The diverse combinations of the nanofillers and the polymers are utilized to fabricate the PNCs with desirable characteristics.

1 Introduction

Recently emerging trends in the packaging industry has demonstrated tremendous advancements due to consumer influences and global preferences. In recent years, polymer nanocomposites have emerged as a revolutionary material in the field of packaging industry due to new trends in nanotechnology that has revealed the capability of providing these factors, in addition to implementing the basic functions of packaging such as preservation, protection, safety, containment, communications and marketing. Efforts are being made worldwide to harness the benefits of these materials, which promise enhanced mechanical strength, improved barrier properties, and reduced environmental impact. The Web of Science (SCI and SSCI) literature database was utilized for paper retrieval. The search strategy involved using the terms “Polymer Nanocomposites for Packaging Applications” in the topic field. 1 The document type was set to “article” to target journal papers specifically. This search resulted in total 59 publications with 4,102 citations in year 2024. Figure 1 provided is a bar chart that provides a visual representation of the research impact in the field of polymer nanocomposites for packaging over a decade. The y-axis indicates the number of publications, ranging from 0 to 55, showing how many publications were released each year from 2015 to 2025. Notably, the number of publications on y-axis remains relatively consistent, with a slight peak in 2021 and 2024 indicating steady research interest as shown in Figure 1. The citation trend reveals the growing influence and recognition of this research area, peaking in 2024 before a slight fluctuation in subsequent years. These patterns suggest that while new research is consistently being added, the impact and relevance of the work have seen significant recognition, particularly in recent years.

Figure 1: 
Publications and citations of polymer nanocomposites for packaging applications. Data has been accessed from web of science, 27 Feb, 2025; https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/citation-report/2acaabe8-b91b-4ff1-9a25-27baf345d7d1-014c9280af?page=1.
Figure 1:

Publications and citations of polymer nanocomposites for packaging applications. Data has been accessed from web of science, 27 Feb, 2025; https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/citation-report/2acaabe8-b91b-4ff1-9a25-27baf345d7d1-014c9280af?page=1.

The network visualization from VOSviewer (visualization of similarities) highlights the key research themes in polymer nanocomposites. One area focuses on technological applications, emphasizing the integration of nanocomposites into various applications like packaging, energy storage and supercapacitors. Another area highlights material properties and characterization, underscoring the importance of evaluating thermal and mechanical properties. The connections between these areas indicate the interrelated nature of technological applications and material properties, reflecting the interdisciplinary essence of this field. Figure 2 illustrates VOS diagram with the words in the title and abstract appearing at least 10 times, of which only 85 terms meet the threshold, of which 65 are used.

Figure 2: 
Visualization of similarities (VOS) diagram of relevant keywords for this study (generated using VOSviewer version 1.6.20).
Figure 2:

Visualization of similarities (VOS) diagram of relevant keywords for this study (generated using VOSviewer version 1.6.20).

Various polymers are used as matrices like polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyvinylchloride (PVC), 2 polylactic acid (PLA), 3 polystyrene (PS), 4 polyethylene terephthalate (PET), 5 polypropylene (PP), 6 polyethylene (PE) 6 , 7 and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) 8 etc. in the field of packaging, 3 constructions, 9 pharmaceuticals, 10 food packaging. 11 Commonly used polymers include polyethylene (PE), which is known for its flexibility and durability, making it widely used in packaging applications. PE provides excellent moisture resistance and is often used in combination with nano clays to enhance its barrier properties. Polypropylene (PP) is valued for its high melting point and chemical resistance. When combined with nanofillers like silica or carbon nanotubes, PP exhibits improved mechanical and thermal properties. 6 , 7 Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is popular for its strength and transparency. Incorporating nanomaterials such as graphene or silicate nanoplatelets can significantly enhance PET’s barrier properties against gases and moisture. 12 Polystyrene (PS) is known for its rigidity and ease of processing. Nanocomposites with PS often include nano clays or metal oxides to improve its thermal stability and barrier properties. 5 , 12 , 13 Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is used for its excellent clarity and resistance to oils and chemicals. Nanocomposites with PVC can benefit from the addition of nano clays or metal nanoparticles to enhance its mechanical and antimicrobial properties. 14 , 15 Polymer nanocomposites are at the forefront of material science due to their unique and advantageous properties. Figure 3 demonstrates the applications of polymer nanocomposites, from packaging and pharmaceuticals to construction and transportation fields with key properties like mechanical strength, thermal stability, barrier functions make them indispensable. Various methods have been employed for the fabrication of PNCs like solvent casting, 16 sol–gel, 17 dip coating, 18 melt intercalation 19 etc. are simple and cost-effective techniques that offers homogeneity, versatility with the ease of low processing temperatures. 10 , 20 , 21

Figure 3: 
Applications of polymer nanocomposites and their key properties.
Figure 3:

Applications of polymer nanocomposites and their key properties.

The physico-chemical and thermal properties of a base polymer can be significantly tailored by calculated incorporation of nanoscale materials in the polymer matrix. These PNCs were found to have superior mechanical strength, 22 enhanced barrier properties, 23 higher thermal stability, 24 antimicrobial capabilities 23 , 25 and improved optical properties 26 particularly in the field of packaging. 11 , 27 The integration of nanomaterials like carbon nanotubes, 28 graphene, 29 metal oxides, 30 metal sulfides, 31 nano clays 23 , 32 etc. into polymers has opened new avenues for developing smart, active, and sustainable packaging solutions. 33 , 34 Due to large surface area, high surface reactivity and non-toxicity, these nanofillers offer a compelling and valuable investigation with potential applications in the field of packaging. 32 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 Various techniques have been employed for the synthesis of nanofillers like sol–gel 10 , 20 , 39 microemulsion 39 , 40 , 41 hydrothermal 42 , 43 , 44 etc. with the precise control over particle size and morphology, facilitating the easy and quantitative growth of particles at the molecular level. These materials not only provide better protection against environmental factors but also contribute to reducing the environmental footprint of packaging by enabling recyclability and biodegradability. 27 As globalization continues to influence market dynamics, the need for innovative packaging materials that align with safety monitoring and quality assurance has become more pressing than ever. PNCs are constructed on the concept that size and surface area are related with a considerably greater reactivity. 21 , 45 , 46 , 47

1.1 Challenges in utilizing polymer nanocomposites for packaging applications

The practical implementation of PNCs as packaging materials faces several significant challenges. Ensuring cost-effectiveness is a primary concern, as advanced materials can be expensive to produce. 32 The migration of nanofillers into food products raises safety issues that must be carefully managed to protect consumer health. Additionally, the environmental burden of packaging materials, which are typically disposed of after use, has become a critical issue. Society increasingly recognizes the importance of recyclability, necessitating the design of single-material packaging rather than multi-layered or composite materials. 11 This shift toward simpler, recyclable materials aims to reduce the environmental impact and promote sustainable packaging solutions. 48

1.2 Current scenario of PNCs in packaging applications

Studies show that packaging waste poses a significant environmental burden, highlighting the need for sustainable alternatives. 49 Recyclability and single-material designs are increasingly preferred over multi-layered composites, aligning with sustainability goals and reducing the environmental footprint. 48 , 50 These materials attract attention due to their enhanced properties and versatility. Saba et al. (2014) emphasize the importance of developing food packaging materials that are functional, environmentally friendly, and easy to recycle. 51 Despite challenges, PNCs have promising potential with improved mechanical strength, barrier performance, and thermal stability. Thermoset polymers are vital for structural applications in sectors like marine, automotive, and aeronautical due to their high specific strength and ease of processing. 52

Advances in nanotechnology have led to the development of PNCs with enhanced functionalities, meeting requirements for various industrial applications like packaging, construction, and pharmaceuticals. Nanocomposites offer advantages over traditional materials, including improved sustainability, lightweight, and increased toughness. 53 Common materials used in thermoset nanocomposites include carbon nanoparticles, nanoclays, metal oxides, and polymeric-based nanoparticles. 54 However, achieving uniform dispersion of nanoparticles remains a significant challenge. Dybka-Stepien et al. (2020) demonstrated the potential of PNCs in extending the shelf life of perishable goods through improved barrier properties. 55

Recent research focuses on cost-effectiveness by developing efficient and scalable production methods. Mittal et al. (2014) suggest that optimizing nanofiller dispersion can reduce production costs while maintaining desired PNC properties. 56 Exploring biodegradable and renewable nanofillers, as discussed by Kuzmina et al. (2019), can mitigate environmental concerns and enhance PNC sustainability. 57 Hassan et al. (2004) investigated nanotechnology applications in high-performance composites, aiming to reduce weight while enhancing strength. The study mainly focused on improving the toughness of nanomodified thermoset composites, addressing fracture toughness in highly cross-linked brittle thermosets. Results suggested that there is a significant improvement in fracture toughness with reactive butadiene-nitrile rubber-modified thermosets. 58

1.3 Strategy for improving the properties of polymeric nanocomposites

Improving the properties of polymeric nanocomposites using carbon-based, metallic, and metal oxide nanoparticles involves several advanced strategies aimed at enhancing their mechanical, opto-electronic, thermal and physico-chemical properties.

Carbon-based nanoparticles, such as carbon nanotubes and graphene, are widely used for their exceptional strength, electrical conductivity, and thermal stability. 59 To maximize their benefits, these nanoparticles are often functionalized with various chemical groups like carboxylic, amine, hydroxyl, thiols etc. to enhance their dispersion within the polymer matrix. This functionalization process improves interfacial bonding, leading to significant improvements in the composite’s overall mechanical and thermal properties. 60 Additionally, hybrid nanocomposites can be created by combining carbon nanoparticles with other nanofillers, such as metal oxides. 51 This synergy results in nanocomposites with enhanced strength, conductivity, and other desirable properties. Surface modification of carbon nanoparticles further improves their compatibility with the polymer matrix, leading to better dispersion and enhanced performance. 61

Metallic nanoparticles, including silver and gold, offer unique properties such as high electrical conductivity and antimicrobial effects. Incorporating these nanoparticles into the polymer matrix can significantly enhance the nanocomposite’s electrical properties and mechanical strength. Alloy nanoparticles, such as silver-copper, provide a combination of improved thermal stability and mechanical performance. 61 Coating metallic nanoparticles with polymers or other materials enhances their dispersion and stability within the polymer matrix, leading to uniform distribution and consistent properties throughout the composite. 62 , 63 , 64

Metal oxide nanoparticles, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) and silicon dioxide (SiO2), are renowned for their excellent mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties. Advanced dispersion techniques, such as ultrasonication and high-shear mixing, are employed to achieve uniform distribution of these nanoparticles within the polymer matrix. 65 Surface treatment of metal oxide nanoparticles with surfactants like CTAB, AOT or coupling agents improves their compatibility with the polymer, leading to enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. 61 Additionally, creating core–shell structures with metal oxide nanoparticles like CdSe/SiO2, TiO2/ZnO etc. can further enhance their functionality, providing improved stability and performance in the nanocomposite. 66

These strategies collectively contribute to the development of polymeric nanocomposites with superior opto-electronic, mechanical, thermal and physico-chemical properties, making them suitable for a wide range of advanced applications, including packaging, electronics, and structural materials. Continuous research and innovation in this field promise even greater enhancements in the future.

The review stands out for its innovative aspects and advantages for the comprehensive integration of various categories of nanofillers, such as metal oxides and semiconductors based, ceramics, carbon-based materials, polymers, and hybrids, offering a broad perspective by examining the unique characteristics of different nanofillers. It provides a detailed summary of recent research on PNC fabrication methods and nanofiller properties, with a focus on packaging. It focuses specifically on packaging applications, allowing for an in-depth analysis of PNC properties and performance. The review also explores the detailed advanced functionalities of PNCs, including their mechanical, thermal, optical, and barrier properties. Emphasizing environmental impact and sustainability, the review highlights the importance of eco-friendly and biodegradable materials. It offers valuable insights into the latest advancements, technologies, and strategies to improve the overall properties of PNCs that showcase their potential for durable and sustainable packaging solutions, making them valuable materials in the packaging industry.

By incorporating these innovative aspects, this review not only provides a comprehensive and focused analysis of PNCs in packaging applications but also emphasizes the environmental and societal benefits of adopting such advanced materials. This makes the paper a significant and timely contribution to the ongoing discourse on sustainable packaging technologies.

2 Synthesis of polymer nanocomposites

Based on the study, high efficiency of polymer nanocomposites can be realized depending on the technique used during preparation is represented in Figure 4. There are many approaches developed to formulate polymer nanocomposites, and each of the methodologies possesses a detailed mechanism of action. The most important techniques used are dip coating, melt intercalation, sol–gel, spin coating, and In situ polymerization etc.

Figure 4: 
Synthesis techniques of polymer nanocomposites.
Figure 4:

Synthesis techniques of polymer nanocomposites.

2.1 Solvent casting method

Polymer nanocomposites are often produced in laboratories using the solvent or solution casting approach. Tetrahydrofuran, toluene, acetone, cyclohexane, dimethylformamide, and numerous other solvents can all dissolve this polymer. Usually, applying it involves allowing the nanofillers to mix with the polymer solution once they have been dispersed in the proper solvent (ethanol in this case). The nanocomposites are separated from the solvent using the latex system’s solvent coagulation or solvent evaporation. Which solvent is preferable depends in large part on how soluble the polymer matrix is. The same solvent can be applied to both the nanofibers and the matrix preparation. This method may be used to produce a well-dispersed nanofiller in the appropriate solvent. 67 , 68

Specifically, Marroquin et al. developed the solution-mixing approach to produce Fe3O4/multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)/CHIT hybrid composites, based on chitosan (CHIT). The mixture was then supplemented with CHIT and acetic acid following an hour of sonication of Fe3O4 and MWCNT in distilled water. Ultrasonication and a magnetic stirrer were then used to agitate the mixture. The mixture was degassed and vacuum dried in order to create the nanocomposite for the following reasons. 69

2.2 Sol–gel method

A wet chemical method called the sol gel process is used to incorporate polymer nanocomposites in thin sheets. One may argue that the dispersion of nanoparticles across the polymer matrix is homogeneous. To summarize, the precursors in sol–gel synthesis are highly reactive metal alkoxide or monomers of polymers. The starting ingredient in the process is an inorganic salt. After blending the basic ingredients in the vapor phase, a sol is produced by controlling the amount of germane constituents and then hydrolyzing the mixture. After heating it to a specific sol temperature, it solidifies into a polymer. According to the method, covalent or hydrogen bonds bind the organic polymers and inorganic nanoscale portions and components of the polymer nanocomposites. Its potential application is limited by the fact that most precursors are pricy and dangerous. Crystalline composites including polymers and inorganic oxide nanoparticles (NPs) are difficult to produce since these polymers are thermally unstable and the sol–gel process might take days or weeks. The primary problem with this process is contraction and brittle fracture caused by the volatile nature of the solvent, the presence of small molecules, and the presence of water. 70 , 71 For example, the sol–gel approach was used to synthesize a nanocomposite of TiO2 and poly-vinyl alcohol (PVA). Triethanolamine was added directly to the mixture to create a homogenous sol, and water was added gently and slowly after that. After introducing and mixing the above-discussed sol, the suspension was prepared at room temperature for the production of PVA and TiO2 nanocomposites. The product had been washed with a water–ethanol solution, and the last procedure for drying was oven drying. A muffle furnace was then used to heat the TiO2/PVA nanocomposites to the necessary temperature. 72

2.3 Dip coating method

The dip coating procedure offers the benefit of being able to cover both sides of the substrate with a high-quality layer. This technique has the benefit of being less costly than the others. Drainage, deposition, and immersion are the three phases. Solvent evaporation comes after solvent removal. In order to give adequate time for coating, the substrate is dipped in the solution at a standard rate during the first phase. Drainage and deposition are the following stages. They are retained in the solvent after the substrate forms. By using the previously indicated method, a thin layer is formed on the substrate and is gradually removed. The process of extracting the product from the crude extract ends with solvent evaporation. Subsequently, the solvent-containing substrate is baked by heating it to a certain temperature. 73 , 74 , 75

2.4 Electrochemical method

Electrochemical synthesis is a straightforward chemical preparation technique carried out with the use of an electrochemical workstation. An electrochemical reaction requires the use of three electrodes: a counter electrode, a reference electrode, and a working electrode. With this synthesis approach, polymer nanocomposite films that may be directly created on an electrode surface for electrocatalytic applications are produced in the most efficient manner. The amount of product produced can also be determined by the integrated charges used, and an electrochemical synthesis could be impacted by an applied potential or current density alone. Many advantages are generally provided by this technology, such as fast reaction times, ease of control, simplicity in operation, and environmental friendliness. Furthermore, by removing the use of an oxidant, the electrochemical method produces a product with higher purity. Unfortunately, the limited surface area of the working electrode has limited the use of electrochemical technologies for large-scale manufacturing. 76 , 77 , 78 , 79

In order to create a layered graphene nanosheet/polyaniline (GNS/PANI) multilayer composite, Gao et al. coated reduced graphene oxide sheets (GNS) using a dip-coating process before electrostatically depositing PANI nanofibers. Using Hummer’s approach, synthetic graphite oxide (GO) was created from natural graphite. The dispersion was sonicated by the researchers in an ultrasonic bath to exfoliate the GO. Then, utilizing glucose as a reductant, GNS was created. The GNS/PANI nanocomposite was created by electropolymerizing PANI nanofibers onto the surface of the GNS film using a three-electrode electrochemical cell that included platinum foil and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE). The GNS layer was created by partially dipping stainless steel sheets into the suspension and letting them dry uniformly. Afterwards, the stainless-steel sheet coated with GNS film served as a functional electrode for the PANI deposition. The electrolyte was a mixture of aniline (0.1 M) and sulfuric acid (1 M). By applying a voltage between 0.2 V and 1.2 V against SCE for two cycles of cyclic voltammetry at a scan rate of 5 mV/s, aniline monomers were In situ electropolymerized on GNS. The creation of the GNS/PANI nanocomposite was aided by the electrostatic interaction between positively charged aniline monomer ions and negatively charged GNS nanosheets. A multilayered GNS/PANI composite was produced after both components were placed on the substrate. In order to produce the multilayered composite, the electro-polymerization procedure was repeated. Afterwards, ethanol was used to rinse the coated samples before they were burnt to dried. 80

2.5 Melt intercalation technique

The melt intercalation method is an economical, solvent-free, and eco-friendly process. Its main benefit is that it produces a dispersion of nanoparticles that is uniformly dispersed, optimizing the material’s thermal properties. Nevertheless, the high temperatures required could change or deteriorate the nanoparticles’ surface characteristics. The polymer matrix is initially heated to a high temperature in this method. Then, after adding the nanoparticles, the mixture is agitated vigorously for a certain amount of time to guarantee even dispersion. Processing conditions, host polymer compatibility, and nanofiller surface modification can all be managed during the dispersion process. 81

2.6 In-situ polymerization

Polymer nanocomposites are often synthesized using this method. In this procedure, the monomer and nanoparticles are combined using an appropriate solvent. In essence, monomers are contacted with nanoparticles to create a polymer nanocomposite, which is subsequently polymerized with the aid of a suitable reagent or free radical initiator. This strategy has a bottom-up methodology. This method can be used to create multidimensional, clearly defined structures that have completely different attributes from their original ancestors. It is frequently difficult to achieve homogeneous dispersion inside a polymeric matrix. A metal precursor is employed in the polymer matrix to create metal or metal oxide particles from nanoparticles. The In situ technique provides for precise control over particle size and form. The sol–gel procedure is the most popular way to chemically transform metal nanoparticles into an organic phase. 26 , 82

3 Properties of polymer nanocomposites

By adding nanoparticles as nanofillers to the polymer matrix, polymer nanocomposites with enhanced optical, mechanical, thermal, and magnetic properties can be produced. Enhancements in these attributes are contingent upon the makeup, dimensions, configuration, and loading of the nanofillers in addition to the surface interactions involving the nanoparticles and the polymer matrix. 83 A brief overview of some of the interesting polymer/nanofiller combinations is presented in Figure 5 along with enhanced properties that are relevant for packaging applications.

Figure 5: 
Combinations of polymers nanocomposites and their relevant properties.
Figure 5:

Combinations of polymers nanocomposites and their relevant properties.

3.1 Mechanical properties

The study of mechanical properties of PNCs for packaging applications is crucial for ensuring the durability, reliability, and effectiveness of packaging materials. PNCs are increasingly used in packaging due to their enhanced mechanical properties. 50 , 59 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 These materials consist of a polymer matrix reinforced with nanoscale particles like clay, silica, or carbon nanotubes. The incorporation of nanofillers significantly enhances mechanical properties, including tensile strength, impact strength, Young’s modulus, stress at yield, strain at break, and elongation at break, making PNCs ideal for packaging. 85 , 86 , 87

Notably, PNCs exhibit increased tensile strength. Abbas et al. (2017) demonstrated that adding nano-silica to polypropylene enhances tensile strength and modulus, crucial for packaging durability during transportation and handling. 49 Roberto Pantani et al. (2023) found that PLA-ZnO nanocomposite films showed a slight increase in Young’s modulus and reduced elongation at break. Adding a plasticizer potentially improves mechanical strength. ZnO/PHBV nano-bio composites exhibited a 57 % increase in Young’s modulus with 4 wt% ZnO NPs loading, attributed to increased PHBV crystallinity, homogeneous nanoparticle distribution, and strong interfacial adhesion. However, the strain at break decreased by 30 % with higher ZnO NPs content due to filler reinforcement. 88 In PP/ZnO nanocomposites, elongation at break and tensile strength values decreased due to agglomeration and poor interfacial adhesion. 89 Singh et al. (2024) incorporated CdSe nanoparticles into the polymer matrix using solvent casting technique. Also, the effect of morphology of CdSe nanoparticles and different concentrations resulted in the enhanced mechanical, optical and physico-chemical properties at minimal concentration of nanofiller. 90 , 91

Increase the mechanical properties of polymer matrices, such as brittleness, strength, flexural strength, elasticity, and ductility, inorganic particles are frequently added. The enhanced mechanical properties are dictated by the interplay between the polymer matrix and nanofiller chemistry, the loading of the nanofiller, and the surface interactions between the two. Numerous studies have revealed that even at low filler loadings, polymer nanocomposites containing nanoparticles like SiO2, TiO2, ZnO, ZrO2, and clay have mechanical strength. Nonetheless, certain limitations might arise from the formation of aggregations at interfacial contacts. 92 , 93 , 94 The mechanical characteristics of a polyvinyl alcohol/silica nanocomposite (SiO2/PVA) were investigated by Nakane et al. They found that when the filler amount was increased to 30 wt%, the brittle composite was produced, and while mechanical strength increased significantly, the percentage of elongation at break decreased. 95 Sengupta et al. studied the mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites made of polyamide-6.6/SiO2, poly (trimethylhexamethylene terephthalamide)/SiO2, and polystyrene (PS)/ZnO. Adding 5 wt% SiO2 nanoparticles improved the matrix’s tensile strength and Young’s modulus made of polyamide-6.6. More than 10 % of the weight of the nanocomposite was loaded with silica, increasing its strength. On the other hand, elongation at break and ductility were also decreased. The nanocomposite becomes more brittle as the nanofiller loading surpassed 25 wt%. Tensile modulus was significantly increased while elongation at break was decreased when 5 wt% ZnO particles were added to the polystyrene matrix. Surface adhesion was unable to manage significant mechanical stresses in a satisfactory manner. 96

3.2 Optical properties

Inorganic particles have been employed for some of the earliest known uses because of their optical characteristics. Over the past 20 years, there has been a lot of interest in the development of transparent polymer nanocomposites with unique optical properties such light absorption, a high refractive index, and photoluminescence. The optical characteristics of nanocomposites are influenced by the distribution, size, shape, and concentration of nanoparticles. The size and shape of inorganic nanoparticles directly affect their intrinsic optical properties, including refractive index, color absorption, and emission. When the size of the nanoparticles decreases to less than 10 nm, a quantum confinement effect is seen, which modifies the optical properties of the nanoparticles relative to their bulk counterparts. 97 , 98

Optical properties such as absorbance, transparency, reflectance, UV-blocking tendency, optical clarity, and opacity are crucial for packaging applications. Mallakpour et al. (2017) used surface-modified TiO2 nanoparticles (30 nm–50 nm) to fabricate PVA/TiO2 nanocomposites via solution casting. These nanocomposites showed significant UV absorbance compared to pure PVA, indicating enhanced UV-blocking capabilities, making them ideal for UV-protective packaging. 99

Marand et al. synthesized PAI/TiO2 nanocomposite films using an in situ sol–gel method. At low nanofiller concentrations, these films exhibited transparency due to uniform nanoparticle distribution, but became opaque as the concentration increased. This study concluded that PAI/TiO2 nanocomposite’s transparency and opacity can be customized by adjusting TiO2 nanofiller concentrations, making them versatile for packaging applications. 100 Kim et al. (2011) fabricated composite films of PVA and graphene oxide (GO) using modified Hummer’s methods and solution mixing. These films, cast onto PET substrates, displayed a layered structure with high transparency of 97 % light transmittance for 0.1 wt% GO and 92 % for 0.3 wt% GO at 550 nm wavelength. This indicates that low-concentration graphene oxide can produce highly transparent composite films suitable for clear, visually appealing packaging. 101 Wang et al. (2005) developed PMMA/SiO2/ZrO2 nanocomposites using a non-hydrolytic sol–gel technique. The nanocomposite films maintained over 95 % optical transmittance even with 20 % nanoparticle loading. The study concluded that this method effectively produces nanocomposites with excellent optical clarity, and their optical properties can be tailored by varying nanoparticle concentrations, making them suitable for high-performance packaging applications. 102

Parlak, Demir, and colleagues created a highly absorbent and transparent nanocomposite to efficiently absorb ultraviolet light. Utilizing a polystyrene (PS) matrix, cerium (IV) oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles were applied to poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) chains in order to precisely match the refractive index. Developing UV-absorbing properties with enough visual transparency has been the subject of a lot of study. CeO2 nanoparticles were tied to PMMA chains in order to match their refractive index to a PS matrix. According to many research, the UV-blocking properties of transparent nanocomposites with minuscule nanoparticle concentrations are significantly enhanced. 103 The amount of UV absorption in composites is mostly determined by their particle size. The absorption edge decreases in particle size as it approaches the blue. Xiong et al. investigated the UV-absorbing properties of a poly (styrene-butyl acrylate) (PS-PnBA) copolymer matrix containing ZnO particles of various sizes, including 60 nm and 100 nm. They observed that when the particle diameter decreased, the UV absorption edge shifted toward the blue. When compared to bulk semiconductor materials, quantum confinement effects cause an increase in the energy band gap and a shift in the UV absorption edge towards the blue side. 104

3.3 Thermal properties

Polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) are notable for their exceptional thermal properties, which are particularly beneficial for packaging applications. Key thermal properties include thermal conductivity, melting point, heat capacity, glass transition temperature, and thermal degradation, crucial for studying thermal stability. 86

Adding copper nanoparticles to LDPE and LLDPE enhances thermal stability due to their higher heat capacity and thermal conductivity. However, exceeding 5 % copper content decreases stability due to energy diffusion from copper nanoparticle clusters. Studies suggest metal ions can accelerate the deterioration of some polymers, such as SAN, when exposed to temperatures above 230 °C for extended periods. 105 Lee et al. (2014) observed that adding nanofillers to an ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) matrix improves thermal stability. 106 Layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanofillers modified with anionic surfactants like sodium dodecyl sulfate (DS), sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (DBS), and stearate (SA) showed significant improvements. DS-LDH/EVA nanocomposites exhibited a 19 °C increase in thermal stability, while DBS-LDH/EVA and SA-LDH/EVA nanocomposites showed a 12 °C increase. Research indicates that carbon nanotubes (CNTs) enhance the thermal stability of polyethylene (PE) due to their excellent thermal conductivity. 107 Li et al. (2005) found that incorporating multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)) into PE via in situ polymerization significantly improves thermal stability and delays the thermal decomposition of the PE matrix. This improvement is attributed to the formation and stabilization of MWCNTs-bonded macroradicals. These findings highlight the importance of PNCs in enhancing thermal properties for packaging applications, ensuring materials can withstand higher temperatures and maintain their integrity during use. 108

For optical and electrical applications, nanocomposites are perfect since they are transparent and thermally stable. 109 , 110 Nanoparticles can enhance mechanical strength, optical clarity, and magnetic properties in polymer matrices in addition to thermal stability. For instance, graphene oxide (GO)-polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) nanocomposites have exceptional mechanical, thermal, and dielectric properties, rendering them perfect for application in sensors, conductive coatings, and energy storage devices. Comparably, functional nanocomposites such as titanium dioxide, cellulose nanoparticles, and carbon nanotubes have demonstrated notable improvements in mechanical, electrical, and optical properties, hence broadening their prospective uses in the biological, electronic, and structural domains. Zirconia and silica nanoparticles were added by Wang et al. to improve the heat stability of poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). The activation energy needed to break down PMMA polymer chains by heat was quadrupled by the addition of merely 0.5 % of nanoparticles. The mobility of polymer chains inside the composites was restricted by inorganic nanofillers, which also prevented free radicals from harming the PMMA main chains. Due to nanoparticle dispersion, which hampered heat transmission and served as a barrier against oxygen and volatile degradation agents, it was demonstrated that a number of transparent nanocomposites, including PMMA/clay, ethylene-propylene-diene/clay, PVA/TiO2, and PS/ZnO, had increased thermal stability. Two of the poly-nanocomposites’ enhanced thermal properties include a delayed decline in the coefficient of thermal expansion and a shift in the thermal degradation start peak. 111 Zhang et al. synthesized a transparent ZnO/PMMA nanocomposite by In situ polymerization and evaluated its heat stability against a composite prepared by direct physical mixing. Because of the interactions between the polymer matrix and the nanofiller at the interface, the in situ polymerized composite exhibited superior heat stability. 112 In situ polymerization was employed by Demir et al. to create a transparent, thermally stable PMMA/ZnO nanocomposite. Research findings indicate that an increase in filler content leads to a higher glass transition temperature in optically transparent poly-nanocomposites that exhibit enhanced thermal properties. 113

3.4 Physico-chemical properties

PNCs have superior barrier properties and solvent resistance, with permeability influenced by particle size, shape, and alignment. High surface area and large aspect ratio nanoparticles enhance barrier properties by forming a tortuous path, increasing diffusion path length, and reducing permeability. 101 , 114 Non-flammability and high thermal stability make these nanocomposites ideal for protective barrier packaging, as they reduce heat and mass transfer between the flame and the polymer. 105 The incorporation of nanofillers can also enhance the thermal stability of the composites, making them suitable for packaging applications that require resistance to high temperatures. 115 , 116 PNCs can also demonstrate improved chemical and solvent resistance, which is crucial for packaging materials that need to shield contents from deterioration. 3 , 45 , 117 , 118 One of PNCs’ greatest benefits is their enhanced gas barrier because nanofillers provide gas molecules a winding route, thus lowering their permeability. 119 PNCs also offer better moisture barrier properties, blocking the passage of water vapor and maintaining the quality and shelf life of packaged goods. Certain nanofillers, like titanium dioxide (TiO2), can enhance the UV resistance of PNCs, protecting the contents from UV-induced degradation. These enhanced properties make PNCs ideal for various packaging applications, including food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic packaging, where they help extend the shelf life and maintain the quality of the. 3 , 119 , 120 Overall, polymer nanocomposites offer a number of benefits for packaging applications, including enhanced mechanical strength, excellent barrier qualities, thermal stability, and chemical resistance, all of which ensure the quality and lifespan of products. 115 , 116 , 121

Nanofillers, such as layered silicates, are used in the packaging industry as flame retardants. Low water vapor pressure (WVP) is desirable for high-performance food packaging, protective coatings etc. 122 Significant barrier efficiency is observed at reduced WVP values. Additionally, nanocomposites possess remarkable tensile strength and modulus properties. A study by Penaloza et al. (2018) uses poly (methyl methacrylate)/nanoclay nanocomposites with 20 wt% nanofiller show a 60 wt% improvement in modulus compared to the base polymer. 123 A study by Kwon et al. (2013) on polymer/graphite nanocomposites found that permeability decreases with low filler loading. 124 Jin et al. (2013) demonstrated that graphite and graphene-filled polyamide matrices exhibit optimal permeability properties at low filler loading. In ethylene vinyl alcohol/graphite nanocomposites, initial vapor permeability decreases with 1 wt% graphite content, but increases at 2 wt% due to nanosheet aggregation. 125 Similarly, water permeability of polyamide (PA11) and polyamide (PA12) nanocomposites increases with graphene content above 0.1 wt% loading. 126 Lai et al. (2015) studied cyclic olefin copolymer filled with graphene, finding that water vapor permeability reduces by 21 % with 0.06 wt% graphene content, but higher loadings increase vapor permeability due to graphene nanosheet agglomeration. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing nanofiller content to achieve desired barrier properties for packaging applications. 127

4 Nanofillers in polymer nanocomposites

Polymer nanocomposites utilize various nanofillers categories, including carbon-based nanofillers, ceramic nanofillers, metal oxides, polymer based and hybrid combinations. These nanofillers enhance various properties like mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of the composites etc. Various types of nanofillers used in polymer matrix are illustrated in Figure 6.

Figure 6: 
Various categories of nanofillers used for packaging applications.
Figure 6:

Various categories of nanofillers used for packaging applications.

4.1 Metal-oxide and semiconductor-based nanofillers

Polymer nanocomposites incorporating metal-based nanofillers have gained significant attention due to their enhanced properties like optical, 128 mechanical 129 and thermal 26 in diverse fields of applications such as pharmaceuticals, 130 packaging 131 etc. Various metal oxide, including alumina, 128 zinc oxide, 132 and titanium oxide, 133 that are commonly used as nanofillers in the polymer matrices are listed in Table 1. Metal nanoparticles, such as copper and silver, can be incorporated into polymers like poly (vinyl alcohol) to improve antibacterial properties and electrical conductivity. 134 , 135 Metal-polymer nanocomposites, particularly those containing Pt, Ni, Co, and Au, are popular for catalytic applications. 134 The preparation methods for these nanocomposites include melt mixing, solution casting, and electrospinning. 35 The growing interest in these materials is driven by their unique properties and potential for improving performance in numerous industrial sectors.

Table 1:

Properties of metal oxides and semiconductor-based in polymer nanocomposites.

S.No. Polymer used Nanofillers/combination Methodology Property estimated Improvements/main findings References
1 PVA TiO2 TiO2/MB nanocomposite synthesized using mechanical milling of TiO2, methylene blue (MB), and citric acid. Addition of PVA at varying concentrations (0, 3, 9, and 14 wt%) to the TiO2/MB composite during wet milling Structural; physico-chemical A 9 % PVA concentration in TiO2/MB created a uniform surface film with excellent oxygen detection. The PVA binder improved consistency across different container sizes 133]
2 PLA PLA/TiO2 PLA/TiO2 nanocomposites were synthesized at varying TiO2 content (0–7 wt%). PLA and TiO2 solutions were mixed in dichloromethane, followed by film casting and drying Thermal; physico-chemical The PLA/TiO2 nanocomposite shows enhanced thermal stability, good antimicrobial properties against certain bacteria and fungi, and improved oxygen barrier properties compared to pure PLA 136]
3 PVA Chitosan/TiO2 PVA/chitosan/TiO2 films were fabricated using solution casting method TiO2 nanofibers by electrospinning, with specific parameters for the electrospinning process Mechanical; physico-chemical Enhances mechanical strength off composite film. The composite films exhibited good antimicrobial properties due to presence of chitosan 137]
4 PLA/PEG TiO2 Incorporation of nano-silica (NS) particles with a size range of 5–20 nm as the reinforcing filler. Melt processing of the PP and NS using a twin-screw extruder to produce PP nanocomposites with 1 %, 2 %, and 3 % NS. Mechanical; structural; physico-chemical Nano-silica improved the ductility of polypropylene but decreased tensile strength, modulus, and impact toughness. Optimal storage modulus at 3 % nano-silica content. Enhanced thermal stability at 30 % weight loss, unchanged at higher losses. Increased water absorption with time. Slightly decreased crystallinity compared to neat polypropylene 129]
5 PVA ZnO PVA-ZnO nanocomposite film was synthesized using solvent casting technique by varying the composition of the PVA solution, ZnO NPs loading Structural; optical PVA-ZnO nanocomposites consist of a wurtzite hexagonal ZnO phase in a monoclinic PVA matrix, confirmed by XRD. The crystallite size increases with higher ZnO ratios. These nanocomposites maintain high optical transparency (up to 82.7 %) with 3 wt% ZnO NPs 138]
6 PVA CdSe PVA-CdSe nanocomposite film was synthesized using solvent casting technique at different loadings of CdSe Mechanical; optical; physico-chemical Enhanced mechanical property (tensile strength from 18 MPa to 35 MPa) at a very low concentration of CdSe (0.1 wt%). Enhanced optical absorbance and opacity. Biodegradability increased by 55 % due to presence of CdSe 33]
7 PVA CdSe PVA-CdSe nanocomposite film was synthesized using solvent casting technique at different loadings of CdSe Mechanical; thermal; optical; physico-chemical Improved melting point, enthalpy. Improved antibacterial and water barrier properties. Mechanical strength improved for both the effect of loading and morphology. Young’s modulus, modulus of resilience and toughness enhanced. Composite films show high UV-blocking tendency effect and absorbance as compared to pure PVA 41]

4.2 Carbon-based nanofillers

Carbon-based nanofillers, including carbon nanotubes (CNTs), 139 graphene, 140 fullerenes, and carbon nanofibers, 141 are widely used to enhance the characteristics of polymer nanocomposites. These nanofillers can improve thermal stability, electrical conductivity, and mechanical strength of polymer matrices 142 are listed in Table 2. However, challenges such as agglomeration and poor solubility often necessitate functionalization of carbon nanoparticles to improve their dispersion and interaction with polymers. Various methods, including In situ polymerization, solution mixing, and melt blending, are employed to incorporate these nanofillers into polymer matrices. 35 The resulting nanocomposites exhibit enhanced characteristics, such as improved bonding strength, fire retardance, and energy storage capacity. 143 Optimizing nanofiller loading and ensuring proper interactions at the polymer-filler interface are crucial for maximizing the benefits of these carbon-based nanofillers in polymer nanocomposites. 144

Table 2:

Properties of carbon based nanofillers in polymer nanocomposites.

S.No. Polymer Nanofillers/combination Methodology Property estimated Improvements/main findings References
1 PVA rGO Preparation: PVA/rGO nanocomposites made via solution mixing and casting

Dispersion: rGO dispersed in DMSO, mixed with PVA solution, and stirred for 24 h

Casting: mixture cast into Petri dishes and dried to form thin films
Strucutral; optical Properties: PVA/rGO nanocomposites have tunable structural, optical, and photoluminescence properties by varying rGO content

Distribution: FESEM analysis shows uniform and isotropic dispersion of rGO sheets in the PVA matrix
16]
2 PVA GO Synthesis: graphene oxide (GO) synthesized from graphite powder using Hummer’s method

Fabrication: PVA-GO nanocomposite films made by mixing GO (0.1%–0.5 %) with 5 wt% PVA

Casting: PVA-GO solutions cast onto glass plates and dehydrated at room temperature to form films
Optical; structural: thermal Optical properties: GO lowers the optical energy gap and absorption spectra

Crystallinity: GO enhances crystallinity

Thermal and mechanical properties: Improved thermal stability and mechanical strength
145]
3 PLA CNTs PLA/CNTs: melt blend PLA and CNTs, then crush and sieve to get powder (<200 μm)

PLA/CNTs@CB composites: mechanically mix PLA/CNTs masterbatch with CB, then compression mold the composite particles
Mechanical; electrical GO reduces the optical energy gap and absorption spectra

GO enhances crystallinity of composite

Improved thermal stability and mechanical strength

PLA/1C@1B composites exhibit high electrical conductivity: 9.8 × 10−2 S/m, tensile strength: 70.1 MPa, flexural strength: 91.3 MPa, impact toughness: 2.8 kJ/m2

Low content of CNTs and CB forms a conductive network without significantly deteriorating mechanical properties
146]
4 PVA/St rGO Synthesis of graphene oxide (GO) using the improved Hummers method

Preparation of PVA/starch (PVA/St) membranes: incorporation of different amounts of GO, in situ reduced GO (IrGO), and ex situ reduced GO (XrGO) into the PVA/St membranes
Mechanical; physico-chemical The PVA/St/IrGO20 and PVA/St/XrGO10 membranes had excellent mechanical properties, with high tensile strength and elongation

The PVA/St/IrGO20 and PVA/St/XrGO10 membranes had strong antibacterial activity against E. coli and MRSA
147]
5 PLA/PEG GNPs/TiO2 Fabrication of nanocomposite films using a solution casting technique

Incorporation of varying amounts of TiO2 nanoparticles (0–0.5 wt%) into the PLA/PEG/GNPs matrix
Optical; electrical; physico-chemical Optical and electrical properties: reduced bandgap; increased refractive index; increased optical conductivity; enhanced dielectric properties

Surface wettability: changed from hydrophilic to hydrophobic
148]

4.3 Polymer nanofillers

Polymer nanocomposites incorporate various types of polymeric nanofillers to enhance material properties. These nanofillers are the nanoscale particles made from polymers which are used to enhance the properties of polymer nanocomposites. 149 , 150 These nanofillers include polyhedral silesquioxanes (POSS), 151 dendrimers, 152 nanogels 153 etc. which can be one-, two-, or three-dimensional, with their high surface area contributing to improved thermal stability, mechanical, optical and barrier properties of the polymer matrix 154 , 155 are listed in Table 3. POSS is a nanostructured material which consists of hybrid organic–inorganic material and dendrimers is a highly branched chain polymer with high degree of functionally that have gained particular attention due to their excellent performance even at low filler content. 153 , 156 The effectiveness of nanofillers depends on their dispersion within the polymer matrix and the quality of the interface between filler and matrix. Various functionalization techniques are employed to modify nanofillers and improve their interaction with polymers. 149 , 150

Table 3:

Properties of polymeric nanofillers in polymer nanocomposites.

S.No. Polymer Nanofiller/combination Methodology Property estimated Main findings References
1. Thermoplastic starch Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) Solution casting followed by drop casting technique was used to make TS-POSS composite Mechanical; thermal; physico-chemical The addition of functionalized NPs to thermoplastic starch (TS) composites improved their thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties. The composite films exhibited enhanced antimicrobial activity against bacterial pathogens. The composite films showed improved biodegradability 156]
2 Polycaprolactone (PCP)/polypropelene carbonate (PPC) POSS Melt blending of PCP/PPC followed by loading of 1, 3, 5 wt% of POSS using compression molding Mechanical; dynamic-mechanical; shape memory The PCL20/PPC80 blend with 5 wt% G-POSS content showed optimal shape memory properties, including a glass transition temperature of 35 °C, a 95 % recovery ratio, and a fast recovery time of 17 s. Excellent elastic modulus of 772 MPa, tensile strength of 85.2 MPa, and elongation at break of 450 % 157]
3 Chitosan POSS Synthesis of POSS NPs via hydrolysis and condensation. Preparation of chitosan-POSS nanocomposite films using a solution casting method, with varying POSS loadings (0.5, 1.0, 3.0, and 5.0 wt%) Mechanical; thermal; antibacterial Adding POSS nanoparticles to chitosan films significantly improved their mechanical properties, including tensile strength, and enhanced their thermal stability. The chitosan/POSS nanocomposite films also showed excellent antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria 154]
4 Polyamide (PI) Ag/POSS Preparation of Ag-POSS nanofiller by in situ chemical reduction of silver nitrate in the presence of POSS solution Structural; thermal The incorporation of POSS into PI film resulted in improved structural, thermal, and wettability properties of the PI nanocomposite. The Ag-POSS-PI nanocomposite exhibited enhanced antifouling and antibacterial performance compared to neat PI 155]
5 Polyester resin Dendrimer Unsaturated polyester resin (UPR) is reinforced with Dendrimer which is coated with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (DMMWCNT) Structural; thermal; mechanical DMWCNT improves the crystallinity index, lattice parameter and crystal size of DMWCNT-UPR nanocomposites. DMWCNT improves the brittleness, stiffness and flexural properties of composite. DMWCNT improved the thermal stability of UPR 158]

4.4 Ceramic-based nanofillers

Ceramic nanofillers are nanoscale particles made from ceramic materials that are used to enhance the properties of polymer nanocomposites (PNCs). 159 These nanofillers can significantly improve the mechanical, thermal, electrical, and dielectric properties of the composites. Types of ceramic nanofillers include silica (SiO2) nanoparticles, 130 known for their high surface area and chemical stability, alumina (Al2O3) nanoparticles, 130 which enhance wear resistance and thermal conductivity, and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles, valued for their photocatalytic properties and UV resistance 160 are listed in Table 4. Additionally, barium titanate (BaTiO3) nanoparticles are used for their ferroelectric properties, enhancing the dielectric properties of PNCs, while zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles offer antibacterial properties and improve mechanical and thermal properties. 132 The advantages of ceramic nanofillers include enhanced mechanical properties, such as increased tensile strength and hardness, improved thermal stability and conductivity, better dielectric properties, and the introduction of specific functional properties like UV resistance and antibacterial activity 160 , 161 , 162 Overall, ceramic nanofillers play a crucial role in advancing the capabilities of polymer nanocomposites, making them suitable for a wide range of advanced applications. Proper functionalization and dispersion of nanofillers in the polymer matrix are essential for achieving optimal performance in nanocomposites. 158 , 163

Table 4:

Properties of ceramic based nanofillers in polymer nanocomposites.

S.No. Polymer Nanofillers/combination Methodology Property estimated Improvements/main findings References
1 Polydi-methyl-siloxane (PDMS) Al2O3 Varying the weight percentage and size of the Al2O3 nanoparticles in the PDMS matrix, as well as maintaining constant surface area of the nanoparticles Mechanical; optical; electrical Alumina nanoparticles in PDMS nanocomposites

Storage modulus (E): significant improvements with 25 nm, 80 nm, and 200 nm nanoparticles at specific weight percentages

Storage modulus and hardness: significant improvements during frequency sweep from 10 to 50 Hz for specific weight percentages and nanoparticle sizes

Damping capacity: significant increase with 75 wt% loading of alumina nanoparticles, as shown by molecular dynamics simulations
164]
2 Polydimethyl-siloxane (PDMS) Al2O3 Varying the weight percentage and size of the Al2O3 nanoparticles in the PDMS matrix, as well as maintaining constant surface area of the nanoparticles Mechanical Al 2 O 3 nanoparticles in PDMS nanocomposites: 25 nm Al2O3 nanoparticles improved elongation by up to 351.8 %. Hardness increased by 107.1 % under various loading conditions

Creep deformation resistance: 25 nm APS reinforcement reduced creep displacements by 52.3 %. 80 nm APS reinforcement reduced creep displacements by 47.72 %

Stress relaxation resistance: increased by up to 62.06 % compared to pure PDMS
165]
3 PVA CeO2/SiC PVA/CeO2/SiC nanocomposite films were fabricated using solution casting technique Structural; optical Surface morphology: homogeneous and well-distributed

Optical properties: improved absorbance, refractive index, coefficient of extinction, and dielectric constant with increasing CeO2/SiC nanoparticle concentration

Optical energy gap: decreases for both permissible and impermissible indirect transitions with increasing CeO2/SiC nanoparticle concentration
166]
4 PMMA MWCNT/ZrO2 Solutions of PMMA and PMMA-MWCNT prepared by dissolving the polymers in tetrahydrofuran followed by stirring Optical; thermal Transmittance: 5 % MWCNTs in PMMA. Decreases from 92 % to 65 %. Increasing ZrO2 NPs concentration: reduces transmittance to as low as 30 %

Optical band gap energy (Eg): decreases from 4.063 eV to 3.845 eV with increased ZrO2 NP concentration

Thermal stability: enhanced in PMMA-MWCNT/ZrO2 nanocomposites
167]

4.5 Composite nanofillers

Hybrid nanofillers, combining different types of nanoparticles, have emerged as a promising approach to enhance the properties of polymer nanocomposites (PNCs). 168 Two-dimensional (2D) nanosheet-constructed hybrid fillers can improve dispersion and multifunctionality in PNCs. 169 The integration of carbon nanotubes with insulating clay layers has been shown to significantly increase lithium-ion conductivity and mechanical strength in polymer electrolytes. 170 Hybrid nanofillers can also enhance mechanical properties, electromagnetic shielding efficiency, and thermal conductivity of polymer. 170 , 171 Various combination of polymers and nanofillers are listed in Table 5. Specifically, the combination of montmorillonite and carbon nanotubes as hybrid fillers in thermoplastic-based nanocomposites has demonstrated improvements in rheology, morphology, thermal stability, flame retardancy, electrical properties, mechanical strength, and tribology. 172 The synergistic effects of hybrid nanofillers facilitate efficient dispersion and optimize the overall functionality of the resulting nanocomposites.

Table 5:

Properties of combined nanofillers in polymer nanocomposites.

S.No. Polymers Nanofiller/combination Methodology Property estimated Main findings References
1. PVA ZnO Graphene Oxide (GO) ZnO nanofiilers was synthesized using Co-precipitation method Opto-electronic The addition of ZnO and GO nanofillers to PVA increases the absorption of PVA 14]
GO was synthesized using hummer’s method The optical band gap (for both direct and indirect transitions) decreases as the concentration of ZnO and GO increases
PVA/ZnO and PVA/GO fabricated using solution casting PVA/ZnO and PVA/GO nanocomposites exhibit good optical properties, making them suitable for optoelectronic applications
2 PVA Cement, SiO2 sand Different sizes of silica sand (380–830 µm, 212–380 µm, 120–212 µm, and 75–120 µm) in cement-based composites with 0.9 % PVA fibers and 2 % nano-SiO2 were used Mechanical Finer sand significantly reduced the workability of the cement-based composites with PVA and nano-SiO2 168]
Mixing procedure following ASTM C305-14 with a 0.38 water-to-binder ratio The cement-based composites made with finer sands had lower compressive strength, flexural strength, and tensile strength
With decreasing sand size, the fracture toughness and ductility of the cement-based composites were also reduced
3 PVP/PVA CdS/ZnO CdS/ZnO (ZCS) core shell was synthesized using microwave method and solution combustion reaction Opto-electronic The PVA-PVP@ZCS nanostructures exhibited enhances the electrical conductivity and optical transparency 44]
PVA/PVP/CdS/ZnO nanostructure was synthesized using solvent casting method The optical band gap of the PVA-PVP@ZCS nanostructures decreased with increasing ZCS filler content
4 PMMA/PEO ZnMn2O4 and CdS Synthesis of the ZnMn2O4/CdS nanocomposite using co-precipitation and thermolysis methods Structure optical Crystallite size decreases as the CdS content was increased 173]
Preparation of the PMMA/PEO/ZnMn2O4/CdS blends using a casting solution method Doping of PMMA /PEO blend with the ZnMn2O4/CdS nanocomposite improved the light-blocking and reflectance properties of the blend
5 PMMA/PANI TiO2 Preparation of polymer blend films using the casting method, with varying amounts of TiO2 (0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2.3 wt%) added Structural thermal optical The TiO2 nanoparticles had an average crystal size of 20.25 nm and were in the anatase phase 174]
PANI synthesized via chemical oxidative polymerization at 0–5 °C The addition of TiO2 nanoparticles led to a decrease in the intensity of various FTIR peaks
Addition of PANI/PMMA (20/80 wt%) and TiO2 (0–1.2 wt%) to DMF, with stirring at 75 °C The addition of TiO2 nanoparticles improved the thermal stability of the PANI/PMMA blend

4.6 Critical summary of nanofiller properties and nanocomposite characteristics

Nanofillers significantly influence the properties of nanocomposites, enhancing their performance for various applications. Like metal oxides, such as TiO2 and SiO2, improve transparency, thermal stability, and antimicrobial properties. Carbon-based fillers, including r-GO, GO, and CNT, offer superior mechanical strength, thermal stability, and electrical conductivity. Table 6 provides a comparison of the properties of different nanofillers below. This table provides salient properties of nanofillers and composites. The table highlights how specific nanofiller properties contribute to the overall improvements in the polymer nanocomposites.

Table 6:

Comparison of various properties of nanofillers and composites.

Nanofiller category Salient property of nanofiller and nanocomposites References
Nanofiller property Property enhancement in nanocomposites
Metal oxides & semiconductor–based TiO2 High refractive index; high UV-absorbance; excellent transparency PVA/TiO 2 /MB
  1. Improved structural properties of overall composite

  2. Excellent physico-chemical properties due to enhanced oxygen detection capabilities of TiO2

PLA/TiO 2
  1. Enhanced thermal stability due to strong interaction of –OH bonds with PLA

  2. Improved antimicrobial properties against bacteria and fungi

  3. Improved oxygen barrier properties compared to pure PLA

3], 175]
Chitosan & TiO2 Strong–OH bonding interaction in TiO2; mechanical property; chitosan offers good antibacterial property PVA/Chitosan/TiO 2
  1. Increased mechanical strength due to presence of TiO2

  2. Improved antimicrobial properties due to the presence of chitosan

137]
SiO2 Mechanical; thermal; optical property; surface area PP/SiO 2
  1. Optimal storage modulus at 3 wt% nano-silica content

  2. Enhanced thermal stability at 30 % weight loss

  3. Increased water absorption capacity with time

  4. Slightly decreased crystallinity compared to pure polypropylene

49]
ZnO Optical transparency; structural property PVA/ZnO (structural and optical property)
  1. Consists of a wurtzite hexagonal ZnO phase in a monoclinic PVA matrix

  2. High optical transparency (up to 82.7 %) with 3 wt% ZnO NPs

65]
CdSe Mechanical; thermal; optical; physico-chemical; particle size and morphology PVA/CdSe
  1. Enhanced mechanical property (tensile strength from 18 MPa to 35 MPa) at a very low concentration of CdSe (0.1 wt%)

  2. Enhanced optical absorbance and opacity

  3. Biodegradability increased by 55 % due to presence of CdSe

PVA/CdSe
  1. Improved melting point, enthalpy

  2. Improved antibacterial and water barrier properties

  3. Mechanical strength improved for both the effect of loading and morphology

  4. Young’s modulus, modulus of resilience and toughness enhanced.

  5. Composite films show high UV-blocking tendency effect and absorbance as compared to pure PVA

41], 91]
Carbon-based r-GO & GO r-GO: High mechanical strength, and thermal stability compared to GO. It has a lower defect density and higher hydrophobicity. GO: Excellent chemical stability, mechanical strength, biocompatibility, thermal property PVA/r-GO
  1. Nanocomposite exhibit tunable structural, optical, and photoluminescence properties at varying r-GO content

  2. Due GO’s excellent dispersion in DMSO and strong interaction with PVA, structural property of the composite enhances

PVA/GO
  1. Optical energy gap decreases and crystallinity increases

  2. Improved thermal stability and mechanical strength

16]
CNT & CB Electrical; mechanical PLA/CNTs and PLA/CNTs-CB (carbon black)
  1. PLA/CNT-CB composite exhibits high electrical conductivity (9.8 × 10−2 S/m)

  2. Improved mechanical properties like tensile strength (70.1 MPa), flexural strength (91.3 MPa), and impact toughness (2.8 kJ/m2)

  3. Low content of CNTs and CB forms a conductive network without significantly deteriorating mechanical properties

145]
GO Mechanical; physico-chemical PVA/St/IrGO and PVA/St/XrGO membranes
  1. PVA/St/IrGO20 and PVA/St/XrGO10 membranes exhibit excellent mechanical properties, with high tensile strength and elongation

  2. These membranes also have strong antibacterial activity against E. coli and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

146], 147]
Graphene Optical; dielectric; structural PLA/PEG/GNPs/TiO 2
  1. Optical properties enhance with reduced bandgap, increased refractive index, and optical conductivity, as well as enhanced dielectric properties

  2. Surface wettability changes from hydrophilic to hydrophobic

148]
Polymer–based POSS Mechanical; thermal; barrier TS/POSS
  1. Improved thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties as POSS improve the interfacial bonding with the TS matrix, leading to enhanced properties

  2. Enhanced antimicrobial activity against bacterial pathogens & improved biodegradability

Polycaprolactone (PCP)/polypropylene carbonate (PPC)/POSS
  1. Optimal shape memory properties with 5 wt% G-POSS content

  2. High elastic modulus, tensile strength, and elongation at break

  3. POSS enhances distribution and stress transfer within the polymer matrix

156], 157]
Chitosan/POSS Thermal; barrier Chitosan/POSS
  1. Improved tensile strength, thermal stability due to rigidity and surface area of POSS

  2. Improved antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria

1]
Ag/POSS Thermal; physico-chemical Polyamide (PI)/Ag/POSS
  1. Improved structural, thermal, and wettability properties

  2. Enhanced antifouling and antibacterial performance due to Ag’s antimicrobial properties

155]
Dendrimer/MWCNT Structural; mechanical Polymer resin/dendrimer/MWCNT
  1. Improved crystallinity index, lattice parameter, crystal size

  2. Brittleness, stiffness, flexural properties, and thermal stability enhances due to uniform dispersion ability of dendrimer’s dispersion ability for MW-CNTs

158]
Ceramic-based Al2O3 Mechanical PDMS/Al 2 O 3
  1. Improved storage modulus at different particle size (25 nm, 80 nm, 200 nm)

  2. Enhanced storage modulus and hardness during frequency sweep (10–50 Hz) as Al2O3 improves load bearing capacity

  3. Increased damping capacity with 75 wt% alumina

PDMS/Al 2 O 3
  1. 25 nm Al2O3 NPs improved elongation by up to 351.8 %

  2. Hardness increased by 107.1 % due to excellent reinforcement provided by Al2O3

  3. Reduced creep displacements by 52.3 % (25 nm) and 47.72 % (80 nm)

  4. Increased stress relaxation resistance by up to 62.06 %

164], 165]
CeO2/SiC Structural; optical PVA/CeO 2 /SiC
  1. Homogeneous and well-distributed surface morphology

  2. Improved absorbance, refractive index, and dielectric constant due to presence of CeO2/SiC

  3. Decreased optical energy gap with increasing nanoparticle concentration

166]
MWCNT/ZrO2 Optical; thermal PMMA/MWCNT/ZrO 2
  1. Decreased transmittance with increased nanoparticle concentration

  2. Reduced optical band gap energy

  3. Enhanced thermal stability

167]
Hybrids/composites Cement/SiO2 Mechanical PVA/Cement/SiO 2
  1. SiO2 improves the overall mechanical strength

  2. Finer sand significantly reduced workability

  3. Lower compressive strength, improved flexural strength, and enhanced tensile strength due to presence of SiO2

  4. Reduced fracture toughness and ductility with decreasing particle size of SiO2

14]
CdS/ZnO Electricity; optical PVP/PVA/CdS/ZnO
  1. Enhanced electrical conductivity and optical transparency due to presence of CdS and ZnO

  2. Decreased optical band gap with increasing filler content

168]
ZnO/GO Optical; electrical PVA/ZnO/GO
  1. Increased absorption of PVA

  2. Decreased optical band gap (for both direct and indirect transitions) with increasing ZnO and GO concentration

  3. ZnO and GO nanoparticles improve opto-electronic properties by enhancing absorption and reducing the optical band gap

44]
ZnMn2O4/CdS Structural; optical PMMA/PEO/ZnMn 2 O 4 /CdS
  1. Enhances structural property by decreasing crystallite size with increased CdS content

  2. Improved light-blocking and reflectance properties due to the photocatalytic activity of CdS

173]
TiO2 Thermal PMMA/PANI/TiO 2
  1. Decreased intensity of various FTIR peaks as TiO2 enhances structural integrity

  2. Improved thermal stability

174]

5 Critical analysis and conclusions

5.1 Critical analysis

The review identifies several key advancements and remaining gaps in the field of polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) for packaging applications. Studies have highlighted the superior mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of PNCs, with nanofillers significantly enhancing the overall performance. However, scalability of production remains a challenge, as most research is limited to laboratory-scale synthesis. Additionally, concerns about nanofiller migration into food products and the recyclability of PNCs require further investigation. While biodegradable polymers have been explored, more research is needed on developing high-performing, recyclable PNCs. Some studies may overstate the benefits of PNCs without adequately addressing cost and environmental impacts. Future research should focus on scalable, sustainable production methods, ensuring safety and regulatory compliance, and developing recyclable materials to fully realize the potential of PNCs for sustainable.

5.2 Conclusions

In conclusion, polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) represent a transformative advancement in materials science, particularly within the packaging industry. Their unique combination of enhanced mechanical properties, superior barrier performance, and reduced environmental impact positions them as a highly effective solution for modern packaging needs. The ongoing development of eco-friendly and biodegradable PNCs aligns with the increasing market demand for sustainable packaging options, addressing the urgent need for industries to reduce their carbon footprints and comply with stringent environmental regulations. The synergistic effects between the polymer matrix and the nanofillers lead to improved characteristics, such as increased surface area, enhanced magnetic behavior, superior catalytic activity, and better optical, mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties. This customization potential allows PNCs to be tailored for specific applications, enhancing their versatility in different fields. Moreover, the lightweight and cost-effective nature of PNCs further contributes to their effectiveness in both environmental and industrial contexts, as they help reduce transportation costs and energy consumption. Various fabrication techniques, including in situ synthesis, solution mixing, melt blending, and dip coating etc., provide the flexibility needed to design PNCs that meet specific performance requirements. As research and development in polymer nanocomposites continue to advance, these materials are expected to play an essential role in shaping the future of sustainable packaging, ultimately contributing to a greener and more sustainable world.

6 Future perspectives

Development of smart packaging, such as active and intelligent packaging technology, plays a crucial role in various applications like pharmaceuticals, food packaging, and construction. 176 Advanced packaging materials enhance food quality, reduce waste, and extend shelf life. Despite extensive research, market applicability remains limited. Future research must address key factors for commercial viability and everyday integration. Further advancements could benefit consumers and manufacturers. 57 Traditional packaging is still widely used, but smart packaging is expected to become more prevalent. Various active packaging includes oxygen scavengers, CO2 scavengers, ethylene scavengers, moisture scavengers, antimicrobial systems, improved nanocomposites, and vacuum packaging. Intelligent packaging includes food quality indicators, data carriers, sensors, and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). 177 Societal recognition of the environmental impacts of packaging materials is crucial. Public awareness and regulatory policies drive the adoption of sustainable packaging solutions. Educating consumers and industries about the benefits of PNCs and their environmental impact can facilitate broader acceptance and implementation.

In conclusion, while there are significant challenges in the practical application of PNCs, as packaging materials, ongoing research and development efforts are paving the way for more sustainable and cost-effective solutions. Future research should continue to focus on balancing the high functionality of PNCs with environmental and societal considerations, as well as advancing packaging technology to meet the evolving demands of the industry. The synergy between technological advancements, cost-effectiveness, and environmental sustainability will be key to overcoming the current challenges and unlocking the full potential of PNCs.


Corresponding author: Amit D. Saran, Department of Chemical Engineering, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, Punjab, 144008, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to sincerely thank the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), a statutory body of the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for the funded research project entitled “Colloidal Quantum dots as Enhancers in Photo Catalytic Hydrogen Generation”, file no. CRG/2021/000011-G.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: All authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: The present research work is not having any source of fnancial support. The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

  7. Data availability: None declared.

References

1. Lee, P.-C.; Su, H.-N. Quantitative Mapping of Scientific Research—The Case of Electrical Conducting Polymer Nanocomposite. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2011, 78 (1), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Hadj-Hamou, A. S.; Yahiaoui, F. Performances of PCL/PVC/Organoclay Nanobioblends Films for Packaging Applications. Macromol. Symp. 2019, 386 (1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.201800239.Search in Google Scholar

3. Nayak, J. K.; Behera, L.; Jali, B. R. TiO2 Strengthened PLA Nanocomposites: A Prospective Material for Packaging Application. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1316, 138892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138892.Search in Google Scholar

4. Jose, J.; Uvais, K. N.; Sreenadh, T. S.; Deepak, A. V.; Rejeesh, C. R. Investigations into the Development of a Mycelium Biocomposite to Substitute Polystyrene in Packaging Applications. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46 (3), 2975–2984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05247-2.Search in Google Scholar

5. Nisticò, R. Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) in the Packaging Industry. Polym. Test. 2020, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106707.Search in Google Scholar

6. Dixit, S.; Yadav, V. L. Optimization of Polyethylene/Polypropylene/Alkali Modified Wheat Straw Composites for Packaging Application Using RSM. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 240, 118228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118228.Search in Google Scholar

7. Winotapun, C.; Aontee, A.; Inyai, J.; Pinsuwan, B.; Daud, W. Laser Perforation of Polyethylene Terephthalate/Polyethylene Laminated Film for Fresh Produce Packaging Application. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 28, 100677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100677.Search in Google Scholar

8. Alsaad, A. M.; Ahmad, A. A.; Dairy, A. R.Al; Al-anbar, A. S.; Al-Bataineh, Q. M. Spectroscopic Characterization of Optical and Thermal Properties of (PMMA-PVA) Hybrid Thin Films Doped with SiO2 Nanoparticles. Results Phys. 2020, 19, 103463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103463.Search in Google Scholar

9. Feldman, D. Polymer Nanocomposites in Building, Construction. J. Macromol. Sci. Part Pure Appl. Chem. 2014, 51 (3), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2014.871948.Search in Google Scholar

10. Bokov, D.; Turki Jalil, A.; Chupradit, S.; Suksatan, W.; Javed Ansari, M.; Shewael, I. H.; Valiev, G. H.; Kianfar, E. Nanomaterial by Sol–Gel Method: Synthesis and Application. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5102014.Search in Google Scholar

11. Wypij, M.; Trzcińska-Wencel, J.; Golińska, P.; Avila-Quezada, G. D.; Ingle, A. P.; Rai, M. The Strategic Applications of Natural Polymer Nanocomposites in Food Packaging and Agriculture: Chances, Challenges, and Consumers’ Perception. Front. Chem. 2023, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.1106230.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Muringayil Joseph, T.; Azat, S.; Ahmadi, Z.; Moini Jazani, O.; Esmaeili, A.; Kianfar, E.; Haponiuk, J.; Thomas, S. Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Recycling: A Review. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2024, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100673.Search in Google Scholar

13. Threepopnatkul, P.; Wongnarat, C.; Intolo, W.; Suato, S.; Kulsetthanchalee, C. Effect of TiO2 and ZnO on Thin Film Properties of PET/PBS Blend for Food Packaging Applications. Energy Procedia 2014, 56 (C), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.137.Search in Google Scholar

14. Badry, R.; Ibrahim, A.; Gamal, F.; Shehata, D.; Ezzat, H.; Elhaes, H.; Ibrahim, M. Electronic Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol/TiO2/SiO2 Nanocomposites. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2020, 10 (5), 6427–6435. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC105.64276435.Search in Google Scholar

15. Arun, K. J.; Meena, M. Application of PVC–A Superior Material in the Fields of Science and Technology. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Mater. 2024, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/25740881.2024.2365288.Search in Google Scholar

16. Suma, S. B.; Sangappa, Y. Physical, Optical and Electrical Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol-Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite Films. Indian J. Phys. 2024, 99 (3), 1097–1110; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-024-03314-0.Search in Google Scholar

17. Kontou, E.; Christopoulos, A.; Koralli, P.; Mouzakis, D. E. The Effect of Silica Particle Size on the Mechanical Enhancement of Polymer Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials 2023, 13 (6). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13061095.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Hema, S.; Sambhudevan, S. Ferrite-Based Polymer Nanocomposites as Shielding Materials: A Review. Chem. Pap. 2021, 75 (8), 3697–3710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-021-01664-1.Search in Google Scholar

19. George, G.; Sachin Kumar, B.; Srinivasan, A. Polymer Nanocomposites for Food Packaging Applications. Adv. Polym. Mater. Technol. 2016, 741–777. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315371054-40.Search in Google Scholar

20. Yang, M.; Shi, J.; Xia, Y. Effect of SiO2, PVA and Glycerol Concentrations on Chemical and Mechanical Properties of Alginate-Based Films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 2686–2694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.162.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Shameem, M. M.; Sasikanth, S. M.; Annamalai, R.; Raman, R. G. A Brief Review on Polymer Nanocomposites and its Applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45 (2), 2536–2539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.254.Search in Google Scholar

22. Cazan, C.; Enesca, A.; Andronic, L. Synergic Effect of TiO2 Filler on the Mechanical Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites. Polymers 2021, 13 (12), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13122017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Shen, Z.; Rajabi-Abhari, A.; Oh, K.; Yang, G.; Youn, H. J.; Lee, H. L. Improving the Barrier Properties of Packaging Paper by Polyvinyl Alcohol Based Polymer Coating—Effect of the Base Paper and Nanoclay. Polymers 2021, 13 (8). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081334.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Ma, H.; Gao, B.; Wang, M.; Yuan, Z.; Shen, J.; Zhao, J.; Feng, Y. Strategies for Enhancing Thermal Conductivity of Polymer-Based Thermal Interface Materials: A Review. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56 (2), 1064–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05279-x.Search in Google Scholar

25. Topolniak, I.; Chapel, A.; Gaume, J.; Bussiere, P. O.; Chadeyron, G.; Gardette, J. L.; Therias, S. Applications of Polymer Nanocomposites as Encapsulants for Solar Cells and LEDs: Impact of Photodegradation on Barrier and Optical Properties. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2017, 145, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.06.013.Search in Google Scholar

26. Bekhti, M. A.; Belardja, M. S.; Lafjah, M.; Chouli, F.; Benyoucef, A. Enhanced Tailored of Thermal Stability, Optical and Electrochemical Properties of PANI Matrix Containing Al2O3 Hybrid Materials Synthesized through In Situ Polymerization. Polym. Compos. 2021, 42 (1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25812.Search in Google Scholar

27. Mansor, M. R.; Akop, M. Z. Polymer Nanocomposites Smart Materials for Energy Applications; Bouhfid, R.; Qaiss, A. K.; Jawai, M., Eds.; Center for Advanced Research on Energy, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka: Melaka, Malaysia, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

28. Sohail, M.; Anwar, U.; Taha, T. A.; Qazi, H. I. A.; Al-Sehemi, A. G.; Ullah, S.; Algarni, H.; Ahmed, I. M.; Amin, M. A.; Palamanit, A.; Iqbal, W.; Alharthi, S.; Nawawi, W. I.; Ajmal, Z.; Ali, H.; Hayat, A. Nanostructured Materials Based on G-C3N4 for Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity and Potentials Application: A Review. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15 (9), 104070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104070.Search in Google Scholar

29. Hajeeassa, K. S.; Hussein, M. A.; Anwar, Y.; Tashkandi, N. Y.; Al-Amshany, Z. M. Nanocomposites Containing Polyvinyl Alcohol and Reinforced Carbon-Based Nanofiller: A Super Effective Biologically Active Material. Nanobiomedicine 2018, 5, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1849543518794818.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. El-Shamy, A. gamal Novel In-Situ Synthesis of Nano-Silica (SiO2) Embedded into Polyvinyl Alcohol for Dye Removal: Adsorption and Photo-Degradation under Visible Light. Polymer 2022, 242, 124579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2022.124579.Search in Google Scholar

31. Saleh, T. A.; Shetti, N. P.; Shanbhag, M. M.; Raghava Reddy, K.; Aminabhavi, T. M. Recent Trends in Functionalized Nanoparticles Loaded Polymeric Composites: An Energy Application. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2020, 3, 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2020.05.005.Search in Google Scholar

32. Zaferani, S. H. Introduction of Polymer-Based Nanocomposites; Petroleum University of Technology (PUT): Abadan, Iran, 2018.10.1016/B978-0-08-102262-7.00001-5Search in Google Scholar

33. Singh, S.; Garg, S.; Saran, A. D. CdSe Nanodots to Nanorods in PVA Films: Effect of Shape Transition and Loading on the Opto-Mechanical and Biodegradation Properties. J. Polym. Eng. 2023, 43 (8), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2023-0031.Search in Google Scholar

34. Singh, S.; Garg, S.; Saran, A. D. Photocatalytic Activity of CdS and CdSe Quantum Dots for Degradation of 3-Aminopyridine. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2021, 6 (3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-021-00159-4.Search in Google Scholar

35. Akpan, E. I.; Shen, X.; Wetzel, B.; Friedrich, K. Design and Synthesis of Polymer Nanocomposites; Institute for Composite Materials: Kaiserslautern, Germany, 2018.10.1016/B978-0-12-814064-2.00002-0Search in Google Scholar

36. Lan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, D.; He, G.; Parkin, I. P. Natural Clay-Based Materials for Energy Storage and Conversion Applications. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8 (11), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202004036.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Mukhopadhyay, R.; Bhaduri, D.; Sarkar, B.; Rusmin, R.; Hou, D.; Khanam, R.; Sarkar, S.; Kumar Biswas, J.; Vithanage, M.; Bhatnagar, A.; Ok, Y. S. Clay–Polymer Nanocomposites: Progress and Challenges for Use in Sustainable Water Treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 383, 121125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121125.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Mittal, A.; Garg, S.; Kohli, D.; Maiti, M.; Jana, A. K.; Bajpai, S. Effect of Cross Linking of PVA/Starch and Reinforcement of Modified Barley Husk on the Properties of Composite Films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 926–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.037.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Saha, A.; Mishra, P.; Biswas, G.; Bhakta, S. Greening the Pathways: A Comprehensive Review of Sustainable Synthesis Strategies for Silica Nanoparticles and Their Diverse Applications. RSC Adv. 2024, 14 (16), 11197–11216. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra01047g.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Teng, F.; Tian, Z.; Xiong, G.; Xu, Z. Preparation of CdS-SiO2 Core-Shell Particles and Hollow SiO 2 Spheres Ranging from Nanometers to Microns in the Nonionic Reverse Microemulsions. Catal. Today 2004, 93–95, 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.125.Search in Google Scholar

41. Singh, S.; Garg, S.; Saran, A. D. CdSe/Polyvinyl Alcohol Nanocomposite Films for Packaging: Thermal, Mechanical, Optical and Physico-Chemical Properties. Iran. Polym. J. Engl 2024, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-024-01320-x.Search in Google Scholar

42. Chen, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Feng, X. S.; Wang, M. Synthesis and High-Performance of Carbonaceous Polypyrrole Nanotubes Coated with SnS2 Nanosheets Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 330, 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.180.Search in Google Scholar

43. Channe, S. S.; Singh, R.; Kulkarni, S. G. Effect of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on Thermal Behavior of Polyvinyl Alcohol. Polym. Bull. 2024, 81, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-023-04858-7.Search in Google Scholar

44. Jilani, W.; Bouzidi, A.; Zahran, H. Y.; Yahia, I. S. Identifying the Functional Properties and Characterizations of PVA/PVP Polymer Blends Incorporating CdS/ZnO Core–Shell (ZCS) Fillers for Optoelectronic Applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2024, 35 (6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-12188-1.Search in Google Scholar

45. Melinte, V.; Stroea, L.; Chibac-Scutaru, A. L. Polymer Nanocomposites for Photocatalytic Applications. Catalysts 2019, 9 (12). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9120986.Search in Google Scholar

46. Romero-Fierro, D.; Bustamante-Torres, M.; Bravo-Plascencia, F.; Magaña, H.; Bucio, E. Polymer-Magnetic Semiconductor Nanocomposites for Industrial Electronic Applications. Polymers 2022, 14 (12), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122467.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Saxena, A.; Mehta, A.; Vasudev, H.; Prashar, G.; Yasir Jasim, N. A Short Review on Machine Learning for the Purpose of Optimizing and Predicting the Properties of Polymeric Nanocomposites. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 2214–7853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.347.Search in Google Scholar

48. Hahladakis, J. N.; Iacovidou, E. An Overview of the Challenges and Trade-Offs in Closing the Loop of Post-Consumer Plastic Waste (PCPW): Focus on Recycling. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 380, 120887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120887.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Seshweni, M. H. E.; Makhatha, M. E.; Botlhoko, O. J.; Obadele, B. A.; Vijayan, V.; Chiniwar, D. S.; Kumar, P.; Vishwanatha, H. M. Evaluation of Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Polypropylene-Based Nanocomposites Reinforced with Silica Nanofillers via Melt Processing Followed by Injection Molding. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7 (12), 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7120520.Search in Google Scholar

50. Kumar, A.; Dixit, S.; Singh, S.; Sreenivasa, S.; Bains, P. S.; Sharma, R. Recent Developments in the Mechanical Properties and Recycling of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites. Polym. Compos. 2024, pc.29261. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.29261.Search in Google Scholar

51. Saba, N.; Tahir, P.; Jawaid, M. A Review on Potentiality of Nano Filler/Natural Fiber Filled Polymer Hybrid Composites. Polymers 2014, 6 (8), 2247–2273. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6082247.Search in Google Scholar

52. Sinha Ray, S.; Yamada, K.; Okamoto, M.; Ogami, A.; Ueda, K. New Polylactide/Layered Silicate Nanocomposites. 3. High-Performance Biodegradable Materials. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15 (7), 1456–1465. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm020953r.Search in Google Scholar

53. Zaghloul, M. M. Y.; Zaghloul, M. M. Y.; Fuseini, M. Recent Progress in Epoxy Nanocomposites: Corrosion, Structural, Flame Retardancy and Applications – A Comprehensive Review. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2023, 3438–3472. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.6144.Search in Google Scholar

54. Sutar, H.; Mishra, B.; Senapati, P.; Murmu, R.; Sahu, D. Mechanical, Thermal, and Morphological Properties of Graphene Nanoplatelet-Reinforced Polypropylene Nanocomposites: Effects of Nanofiller Thickness. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5 (1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5010024.Search in Google Scholar

55. Dybka-Stępień, K.; Antolak, H.; Kmiotek, M.; Piechota, D.; Koziróg, A. Disposable Food Packaging and Serving Materials—Trends and Biodegradability. Polymers 2021, 13 (20), 3606. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13203606.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

56. Mittal, V., Ed. Polymer nanocomposite foams, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2013.10.1201/b15572Search in Google Scholar

57. Glaskova-Kuzmina, T.; Starkova, O.; Gaidukovs, S.; Platnieks, O.; Gaidukova, G. Durability of Biodegradable Polymer Nanocomposites. Polymers 2021, 13 (19), 3375. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193375.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

58. Hassan, S. F.; Gupta, M. Development of High Performance Magnesium Nano-Composites Using Nano-Al2O3 as Reinforcement. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 392 (1–2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.047.Search in Google Scholar

59. Kumar, A.; Sharma, K.; Dixit, A. R. Carbon Nanotube- and Graphene-Reinforced Multiphase Polymeric Composites: Review on Their Properties and Applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55 (7), 2682–2724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04196-y.Search in Google Scholar

60. Speranza, G. Carbon Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Functionalization and Sensing Applications. Nanomaterials 2021, 11 (4), 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11040967.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

61. Rong, M. Z.; Zhang, M. Q.; Ruan, W. H. Surface Modification of Nanoscale Fillers for Improving Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites: A Review. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2006, 22 (7), 787–796. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328406X101247.Search in Google Scholar

62. Peng, T.; Xiao, R.; Rong, Z.; Liu, H.; Hu, Q.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, J. Polymer Nanocomposite‐based Coatings for Corrosion Protection. Chem. – Asian J. 2020, 15 (23), 3915–3941. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202000943.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

63. Faupel, F.; Zaporojtchenko, V.; Strunskus, T.; Elbahri, M. Metal‐Polymer Nanocomposites for Functional Applications. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2010, 12 (12), 1177–1190. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201000231.Search in Google Scholar

64. Nguyen-Tri, P.; Nguyen, T. A.; Carriere, P.; Ngo Xuan, C. Nanocomposite Coatings: Preparation, Characterization, Properties, and Applications. Int. J. Corros. 2018, 2018, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4749501.Search in Google Scholar

65. Abd-Elnaiem, A. M.; Rashad, M.; Hanafy, T. A.; Shaalan, N. M. Improvement of Optical Properties of Functionalized Polyvinyl Alcohol-Zinc Oxide Hybrid Nanocomposites for Wide UV Optoelectronic Applications. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2023, 33 (8), 2429–2444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-023-02616-w.Search in Google Scholar

66. Mathew, S.; Saran, A. D.; Singh Bhardwaj, B.; Ani Joseph, S.; Radhakrishnan, P.; Nampoori, V. P. N.; Vallabhan, C. P. G.; Bellare, J. R. Size Dependent Optical Properties of the CdSe-CdS Core-Shell Quantum Dots in the Strong Confinement Regime. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111 (7). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3702430.Search in Google Scholar

67. Sabr, O.; Hussein, A.; Obaid, M. Preparation and Evalution Water Resistance, Mechanical and Morpholgical Characteristics of Pva/SiO2 Nanocomposites for Food Industry Applications. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostructures 2021, 16 (2), 733–745; https://doi.org/10.15251/djnb.2021.162.733.Search in Google Scholar

68. Soliman, T. S.; Vshivkov, S. A.; Elkalashy, S. I. Structural, Thermal, and Linear Optical Properties of SiO2 Nanoparticles Dispersed in Polyvinyl Alcohol Nanocomposite Films. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41 (8), 3340–3350. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25623.Search in Google Scholar

69. Marroquin, J. B.; Rhee, K. Y.; Park, S. J. Chitosan Nanocomposite Films: Enhanced Electrical Conductivity, Thermal Stability, and Mechanical Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92 (2), 1783–1791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

70. Qasim, M.; Ananthaiah, J.; Dhara, S.; Paik, P.; Das, D. Synthesis and Characterization of Ultra-Fine Colloidal Silica Nanoparticles. Adv. Sci. Eng. Med. 2014, 6 (9), 965–973. https://doi.org/10.1166/asem.2014.1578.Search in Google Scholar

71. Rahman, I. A.; Padavettan, V. Synthesis of Silica Nanoparticles by Sol–Gel: Size-dependent Properties, Surface Modification, and Applications in Silica-Polymer Nanocompositesa Review. J. Nanomater. 2012, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/132424.Search in Google Scholar

72. Jaseela, P. K.; Garvasis, J.; Joseph, A. Selective Adsorption of Methylene Blue (MB) Dye from Aqueous Mixture of MB and Methyl Orange (MO) Using Mesoporous Titania (TiO2) – Poly Vinyl Alcohol (PVA) Nanocomposite. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 286, 110908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.110908.Search in Google Scholar

73. Pourhashem, S.; Saba, F.; Duan, J.; Rashidi, A.; Guan, F.; Nezhad, E. G.; Hou, B. Polymer/Inorganic Nanocomposite Coatings with Superior Corrosion Protection Performance: A Review. Korean Soc. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2020.04.029.Search in Google Scholar

74. Lawal, A. T. Recent Progress in Graphene Based Polymer Nanocomposites. Cogent Chem 2020, 6 (1), 1833476. https://doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2020.1833476.Search in Google Scholar

75. Rajlaxmi; Gupta, N.; Behere, R. P.; Layek, R. K.; Kuila, B. K. Polymer Nanocomposite Membranes and Their Application for Flow Catalysis and Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants. Mater. Today Chem. 2021, 22, 100600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100600.Search in Google Scholar

76. Shrivastava, S.; Jadon, N.; Jain, R. Next-Generation Polymer Nanocomposite-Based Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors: A Review. TrAC – Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 82, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2016.04.005.Search in Google Scholar

77. Siwal, S. S.; Zhang, Q.; Devi, N.; Thakur, V. K. Carbon-Based Polymer Nanocomposite for High-Performance Energy Storage Applications. Polymers 2020, 12 (3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030505.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

78. Bozlar, M.; Miomandre, F.; Bai, J. Electrochemical Synthesis and Characterization of Carbon Nanotube/Modified Polypyrrole Hybrids Using a Cavity Microelectrode. Carbon 2009, 47 (1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2008.09.030.Search in Google Scholar

79. Nešović, K. R.; Mišković-Stanković, V. B. Graphene-Based Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Chitosan Hydrogels with Electrochemically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles for Medical Applications – A Review. Bulg. Chem. Commun. 2020, 52, 5–14.Search in Google Scholar

80. Gao, Z.; Yang, W.; Wang, J.; Yan, H.; Yao, Y.; Ma, J.; Wang, B.; Zhang, M.; Liu, L. Electrochemical Synthesis of Layer-By-Layer Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets/Polyaniline Nanofibers Composite and its Electrochemical Performance. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 91, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.119.Search in Google Scholar

81. Tanahashi, M. Development of Fabrication Methods of Filler/Polymer Nanocomposites: With Focus on Simple Melt-Compounding-Based Approach without Surface Modification of Nanofillers. Materials 2010, 3 (3), 1593–1619. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3031593.Search in Google Scholar

82. Kaminsky, W. Polyole Fi N-Nanocomposites with Special Properties by In-Situ Polymerization. 2018, 3 (6), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1715-x,Search in Google Scholar

83. Loste, J.; Lopez-Cuesta, J. M.; Billon, L.; Garay, H.; Save, M. Transparent Polymer Nanocomposites: An Overview on Their Synthesis and Advanced Properties. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 89, 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.10.003.Search in Google Scholar

84. Kumar, A.; Sharma, K.; Dixit, A. R. Carbon Nanotube- and Graphene-Reinforced Multiphase Polymeric Composites: Review on Their Properties and Applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55 (7), 2682–2724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04196-y.Search in Google Scholar

85. Raj, R.; Moharana, A. P.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, A.; Dixit, A. R.; Górski, F. Tensile, Flexural, and Compressive Strength of Natural and Glass Fabric Composites Fabricated Using Vat-Photopolymerization Additive Manufacturing. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2024, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-10424-7.Search in Google Scholar

86. Kumar, A.; Sharma, K.; Dixit, A. R. A Review of the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Graphene and its Hybrid Polymer Nanocomposites for Structural Applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54 (8), 5992–6026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03244-3.Search in Google Scholar

87. Kumar, A.; Sharma, K.; Dixit, A. R. A Review on the Mechanical Properties of Polymer Composites Reinforced by Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene. Carbon Lett 2021, 31 (2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-020-00161-x.Search in Google Scholar

88. Seshweni, M. H. E.; Makhatha, M. E.; Botlhoko, O. J.; Obadele, B. A.; Vijayan, V.; Chiniwar, D. S.; Kumar, P.; Vishwanatha, H. M. Evaluation of Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Polypropylene-Based Nanocomposites Reinforced with Silica Nanofillers via Melt Processing Followed by Injection Molding. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7 (12), 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7120520.Search in Google Scholar

89. Polat, S.; Fenercioglu, H.; Unal Turhan, E.; Guclu, M. Effects of Nanoparticle Ratio on Structural, Migration Properties of Polypropylene Films and Preservation Quality of Lemon Juice. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42 (4), e13541. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13541.Search in Google Scholar

90. Singh, S.; Garg, S.; Saran, A. D. CdSe/Polyvinyl Alcohol Nanocomposite Films for Packaging: Thermal, Mechanical, Optical and Physico-Chemical Properties. Iran. Polym. J. 2024, 33 (9), 1257–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-024-01320-x.Search in Google Scholar

91. Singh, S.; Garg, S.; Saran, A. D. CdSe Nanodots to Nanorods in PVA Films: Effect of Shape Transition and Loading on the Opto-Mechanical and Biodegradation Properties. J. Polym. Eng. 2023, 43 (8), 715–728. 10.1515/polyeng-2023-0031Search in Google Scholar

92. Jafari, T.; Moharreri, E.; Amin, A. S.; Miao, R.; Song, W.; Suib, S. L. Photocatalytic Water Splitting – the Untamed Dream: A Review of Recent Advances. Molecules 2016, 21 (7). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21070900.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

93. Aziz Aljar, M. A.; Zulqarnain, M.; Shah, A.; Akhter, M. S.; Iftikhar, F. J. A Review of Renewable Energy Generation Using Modified Titania for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. AIP Adv. 2020, 10 (7). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0006196.Search in Google Scholar

94. Kumar, A.; Sharma, K.; Dixit, A. R. A Review on the Mechanical Properties of Polymer Composites Reinforced by Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene. Carbon Lett 2021, 31 (2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-020-00161-x.Search in Google Scholar

95. Nakane, K.; Yamashita, T.; Iwakura, K.; Suzuki, F. Properties and Structure of Poly (Vinyl Alcohol)/Silica, 1999; pp. 133–138.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991003)74:1<133::AID-APP16>3.0.CO;2-NSearch in Google Scholar

96. Sengupta, R.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Sabharwal, S.; Chaki, T. K.; Bhowmick, A. K. Polyamide-6 , 6/In Situ Silica Hybrid Nanocomposites by Sol – Gel Technique. Synthesis , Characterization and Properties 2005, 46, 3343–3354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.02.104.Search in Google Scholar

97. Liu, B.; Wang, C.; Bazri, S.; Badruddin, I. A.; Orooji, Y.; Saeidi, S.; Wongwises, S.; Mahian, O. Optical Properties and Thermal Stability Evaluation of Solar Absorbers Enhanced by Nanostructured Selective Coating Films. Powder Technol. 2021, 377, 939–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.09.040.Search in Google Scholar

98. Rakesh, P. K. Optical Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites. Adv. Polym. Nanocomposites Sci. Technol. Appl. 2022, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824492-0.00012-X.Search in Google Scholar

99. Mallakpour, S.; Behranvand, V. Green Hybrid Nanocomposites from Metal Oxides. In Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) and Poly(Vinyl Pyrrolidone): Structure and Chemistry; Center of Excellence in Sensors and Green Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Isfahan University of Technology: Isfahan, 2017; p 289.10.1016/B978-0-08-100791-4.00010-0Search in Google Scholar

100. Hu, Q.; Marand, E. In Situ Formation of Nanosized TiO 2 Domains within Poly(Amide–Imide) by a Sol–Gel Process. Polymer 1999, 40 (17), 4833–4843. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00264-X.Search in Google Scholar

101. Kim, H. M.; Lee, J. K.; Lee, H. S. Transparent and High Gas Barrier Films Based on Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Graphene Oxide Composites. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519 (22), 7766–7771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.016.Search in Google Scholar

102. Wang, H.; Xu, P.; Zhong, W.; Shen, L.; Du, Q. Transparent Poly(Methyl Methacrylate)/Silica/Zirconia Nanocomposites with Excellent Thermal Stabilities. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 87 (2), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.08.015.Search in Google Scholar

103. Parlak, O.; Demir, M. M. Toward Transparent Nanocomposites Based on Polystyrene Matrix and PMMA-Grafted CeO2 Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3 (11), 4306–4314. https://doi.org/10.1021/am200983h.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

104. Xiong, M.; Gu, G.; You, B.; Wu, L. Preparation and Characterization of Poly (Styrene Butylacrylate) Latex/Nano-ZnO Nanocomposites. Appl. Poly. 2003, 90 (7), 1923–1931; https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12869.Search in Google Scholar

105. Youssef, A. M. Polymer Nanocomposites as a New Trend for Packaging Applications. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2013, 52 (7), 635–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2012.762673.Search in Google Scholar

106. Li, Y.; He, H.; Ma, Y.; Geng, Y.; Tan, J. Rheological and Mechanical Properties of Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene/High Density Polyethylene/Polyethylene Glycol Blends. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2019, 2 (1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2018.08.004.Search in Google Scholar

107. Shi, Y.; Chen, F.; Yang, J.; Zhong, M. Crystallinity and Thermal Stability of LDH/Polypropylene Nanocomposites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 50 (1), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.07.007.Search in Google Scholar

108. Xie, B.; Wang, L.; Li, H.; Huo, H.; Cui, C.; Sun, B.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J.; Yin, G.; Zuo, P. An Interface-Reinforced Rhombohedral Prussian Blue Analogue in Semi-solid State Electrolyte for Sodium-Ion Battery. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 36, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.008.Search in Google Scholar

109. Huang, X.; Zhi, C.; Lin, Y.; Bao, H.; Wu, G.; Jiang, P.; Mai, Y. W. Thermal Conductivity of Graphene-Based Polymer Nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2020, 142, 100577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2020.100577.Search in Google Scholar

110. Chen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xiong, J.; Du, S.; Zhang, P.; Shi, X.; Yu, J. MXene/Polymer Nanocomposites: Preparation, Properties, and Applications. Polym. Rev. 2021, 61 (1), 80–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2020.1729179.Search in Google Scholar

111. Wang, H.; Xu, P.; Zhong, W.; Shen, L.; Du, Q. Transparent Poly (Methyl Methacrylate)/Silica/Zirconia Nanocomposites with Excellent Thermal Stabilities. Polym. Degr. Stabi. 2005, 87, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.08.015.Search in Google Scholar

112. Zhang, L.; Li, F.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X. Synthesis of Transparent ZnO/PMMA Nanocomposite Films through Free-Radical Copolymerization of Asymmetric Zinc Methacrylate Acetate and In-Situ Thermal Decomposition. J. Lumin. 2011, 131 (8), 1701–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2011.03.065.Search in Google Scholar

113. Demir, M. M.; Memesa, M.; Castignolles, P.; Wegner, G. PMMA/Zinc Oxide Nanocomposites Prepared by In-Situ Bulk Polymerization. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27 (10), 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200500870.Search in Google Scholar

114. Mahmud, M. A.; Abir, N.; Anannya, F. R.; Nabi Khan, A.; Rahman, A. N. M. M.; Jamine, N. Coir Fiber as Thermal Insulator and its Performance as Reinforcing Material in Biocomposite Production. Heliyon 2023, 9 (5), e15597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15597.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

115. Dirpan, A.; Ainani, A. F.; Djalal, M. A Bibliometrics Visualization Analysis of Active Packaging System for Food Packaging. Heliyon 2023, 9 (8), e18457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18457.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

116. Trinh, B. M.; Chang, B. P.; Mekonnen, T. H. The Barrier Properties of Sustainable Multiphase and Multicomponent Packaging Materials: A Review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2023, 133, 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101071.Search in Google Scholar

117. Lee, S. L.; Chang, C. J. Recent Developments about Conductive Polymer Based Composite Photocatalysts. Polymers 2019, 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11020206.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

118. Jagadeesh, P.; Puttegowda, M.; Thyavihalli Girijappa, Y. G.; Rangappa, S. M.; Siengchin, S. Effect of Natural Filler Materials on Fiber Reinforced Hybrid Polymer Composites: An Overview. J. Nat. Fibers 2022, 19 (11), 4132–4147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1854145.Search in Google Scholar

119. Etuk, I. F.; Inyang, U. E. Applications of Various Plasticizers in the Plastic Industry-Review. Int. J. Eng. Mod. Technol. 2024, 10, 38–55. https://doi.org/10.56201/ijemt.v10.no1.2024.pg38.54.Search in Google Scholar

120. Bhowmik, C.; Bhowmik, S.; Ray, A.; Pandey, K. M. Optimal Green Energy Planning for Sustainable Development: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 71, 796–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.105.Search in Google Scholar

121. Nguyen, T. P.; Yang, S. H. Hybrid Materials Based on Polymer Nanocomposites for Environmental Applications; National Chiao Tung University: Tainan, Taiwan, 2018.10.1016/B978-0-08-102262-7.00019-2Search in Google Scholar

122. Kausar, A. A Review of High Performance Polymer Nanocomposites for Packaging Applications in Electronics and Food Industries. J. Plast. Film Sheeting 2020, 36 (1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756087919849459.Search in Google Scholar

123. Penaloza, Jr.; D, P.; Seery, T. A. P. Silylated Functionalized Montmorillonite Clay for Nanocomposite Preparation. Epitoanyag - J. Silic. Based Compos. Mater. 2018, 70 (5), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2018.26.Search in Google Scholar

124. Kwon, H.; Kim, D.; Seo, J.; Han, H. Enhanced Moisture Barrier Films Based on EVOH/Exfoliated Graphite (EGn) Nanocomposite Films by Solution Blending. Macromol. Res. 2013, 21 (9), 987–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-013-1124-4.Search in Google Scholar

125. Jin, J.; Rafiq, R.; Gill, Y. Q.; Song, M. Preparation and Characterization of High Performance of Graphene/Nylon Nanocomposites. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49 (9), 2617–2626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

126. Tan, B.; Thomas, N. L. A Review of the Water Barrier Properties of Polymer/Clay and Polymer/Graphene Nanocomposites. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 514, 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.026.Search in Google Scholar

127. Lai, C.-L.; Fu, Y.-J.; Chen, J.-T.; Wang, D.-M.; Sun, Y.-M.; Huang, S.-H.; Hung, W.-S.; Hu, C.-C.; Lee, K.-R. Composite of Cyclic Olefin Copolymer with Low Graphene Content for Transparent Water-Vapor-Barrier Films. Carbon 2015, 90, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.006.Search in Google Scholar

128. Dhatarwal, P.; Choudhary, S.; Sengwa, R. J. Dielectric and Optical Properties of Alumina and Silica Nanoparticles Dispersed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Matrix-Based Nanocomposites for Advanced Polymer Technologies. J. Polym. Res. 2021, 28 (2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-02406-9.Search in Google Scholar

129. Morales, J.; Michell, R. M.; Sommer-Márquez, A.; Rodrigue, D. Effect of Biobased SiO2 on the Morphological, Thermal, Mechanical, Rheological, and Permeability Properties of PLLA/PEG/SiO2 Biocomposites. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7 (4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7040150.Search in Google Scholar

130. Ibrahim, M. W.; Khane, Y.; Mahmood, Y. T.; Schulz, A.; Kosslick, H. Mesoporous Aluminosilicate Materials Supported Zinc Oxide Photocatalytic Degradation of Pharmaceutical Pollutants. Desalination Water Treat. 2024, 320, 100588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100588.Search in Google Scholar

131. Yakdoumi, F. Z.; Hadj-Hamou, A. S. Effectiveness Assessment of TiO2-Al2O3 nano-Mixture as a Filler Material for Improvement of Packaging Performance of PLA Nanocomposite Films. J. Polym. Eng. 2020, 40 (10), 848–858. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2020-0105.Search in Google Scholar

132. Ponnamma, D.; Cabibihan, J. J.; Rajan, M.; Pethaiah, S. S.; Deshmukh, K.; Gogoi, J. P.; Pasha, S. K. K.; Ahamed, M. B.; Krishnegowda, J.; Chandrashekar, B. N.; Polu, A. R.; Cheng, C. Synthesis, Optimization and Applications of ZnO/Polymer Nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 98, 1210–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.081.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

133. Nayak, J. K.; Behera, L.; Jali, B. R. TiO2 Strengthened PLA Nanocomposites: A Prospective Material for Packaging Application. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1316, 138892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138892.Search in Google Scholar

134. Wassel, A. R.; El-Naggar, M. E.; Shoueir, K. Recent Advances in Polymer/Metal/Metal Oxide Hybrid Nanostructures for Catalytic Applications: A Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8 (5), 104175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104175.Search in Google Scholar

135. Saber, A. I.; Dabis, H. K.; Alsultany, N. M. A.; Abdulwahab, H. M. H.; Behmagham, F.; Vessally, E. Recent Advances on the Metal Oxides and Nanocomposites Based on Quantum Dots and Metal Oxides for Supercapacitor Applications: A Mini-Review. J. Alloys Compd. Commun 2024, 100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacomc.2024.100015.Search in Google Scholar

136. Boonyarattanakalin, K.; Rattan, P.; Songpanit, M.; Chutipaijit, S.; Okumura, H.; Ishihara, K. N.; Mekprasart, W.; Pecharapa, W. The Effect of Polyvinyl Alcohol Addition on the Optical Properties and Oxygen Detection Performance of Titanium Dioxide and Methylene Blue Nanocomposite Colorimetric Indicators. Polymers 2024, 16 (10). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16101400.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

137. Abdou, E. S.; Abdel-Hakim, A.; Morsi, R. E. Influence of Citronella Essential Oil and TiO2 Nanoparticles on the Optical, Mechanical and Thermal Characteristics of Chitosan/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Blended Films and Nanofibers. Polym. Bull. 2024, 81 (9), 7943–7961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-023-05081-0.Search in Google Scholar

138. Abd-Elnaiem, A. M.; Rashad, M.; Hanafy, T. A.; Shaalan, N. M. Improvement of Optical Properties of Functionalized Polyvinyl Alcohol-Zinc Oxide Hybrid Nanocomposites for Wide UV Optoelectronic Applications. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2023, 33 (8), 2429–2444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-023-02616-w.Search in Google Scholar

139. Papageorgiou, D. G.; Li, Z.; Liu, M.; Kinloch, I. A.; Young, R. J. Mechanisms of Mechanical Reinforcement by Graphene and Carbon Nanotubes in Polymer Nanocomposites. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (4), 2228–2267. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr06952f.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

140. Zeinedini, A. Fracture Toughness of Graphene/Polymer Nanocomposites: Well Dispersion, Agglomeration and Toughening Mechanisms. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2024, 131, 104449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104449.Search in Google Scholar

141. Su, X.; Yang, Z.; Cheng, R.; Luvnish, A.; Han, S.; Meng, Q.; Stanford, N.; Ma, J. A Comparative Study of Polycarbonate Nanocomposites Respectively Containing Graphene Nanoplatelets, Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Nanofibers. Adv. Nanocompos. 2024, 1 (1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adna.2023.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

142. Ali, Z.; Yaqoob, S.; Yu, J.; D’Amore, A. Critical Review on the Characterization, Preparation, and Enhanced Mechanical, Thermal, and Electrical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes and Their Hybrid Filler Polymer Composites for Various Applications. Compos. Part C Open Access 2024, 13, 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100434.Search in Google Scholar

143. Rahimi-Ahar, Z.; Rahimi Ahar, L. Thermal, Optical, Mechanical, Dielectric, and Electrical Properties of Nanocomposites. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 218, 113337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113337.Search in Google Scholar

144. 0Harito, C.; Bavykin, D. V.; Yuliarto, B.; Dipojono, H. K.; Walsh, F. C. Polymer Nanocomposites Having a High Filler Content: Synthesis, Structures, Properties, and Applications. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (11), 4653–4682. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr00117d.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

145. Iqbal, M.; Niazi, M. B. K.; Jahan, Z.; Ahmad, T.; Hussain, Z.; Sher, F. Fabrication and Characterization of Carbon-Based Nanocomposite Membranes for Packaging Application. Polym. Bull. 2022, 79 (7), 5019–5040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-021-03763-1.Search in Google Scholar

146. Kuang, T.; Zhang, M.; Chen, F.; Fei, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhong, M.; Wu, B.; Liu, T. Creating Poly(Lactic Acid)/Carbon Nanotubes/Carbon Black Nanocomposites with High Electrical Conductivity and Good Mechanical Properties by Constructing a Segregated Double Network with a Low Content of Hybrid Nanofiller. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2023, 6 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00622-z.Search in Google Scholar

147. Dangi, S. B.; Leel, N. S.; Quraishi, A. M.; Hashmi, S. Z.; Kumar, S.; Dalela, S.; Singh, J.; Choudhary, B. L.; Ahmad, M. A.; Alvi, P. A. Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) Polymer Nanocomposites: Ecological Preparation and Application-Oriented Characterizations. Opt. Mater. 2024, 148, 114965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2024.114965.Search in Google Scholar

148. Shehzad, A.; Aslam, M.; Basit, M.; Salman, M. Effect of Titanium Oxide on Structural and Optoelectrical Properties of PLA/PEG/Graphene Nanocomposite Films. Synth. Met. 2024, 307, 117696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2024.117696.Search in Google Scholar

149. Chandrashekar, A.; Hegde, M.; Krishna, S.; Ayippadath Gopi, J.; Kotresh, T. M.; Prabhu, T. N. Non-Covalent Surface Functionalization of Nanofillers towards the Enhancement of Thermal Conductivity of Polymer Nanocomposites: A Mini Review. Eur. Polym. J. 2023, 198, 112379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112379.Search in Google Scholar

150. Quader, R.; Narayanan, L. K.; Caldona, E. B. Dielectric Characterization of Fiber- and Nanofiller-Reinforced Polymeric Materials. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2024, 141 (19), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.55362.Search in Google Scholar

151. Dorigato, A.; Fredi, G. Effect of Nanofillers Addition on the Compatibilization of Polymer Blends. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2023, 7 (4), 405–427; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2023.09.004.Search in Google Scholar

152. Yasir, A. T.; Benamor, A.; Hawari, A. H.; Mahmoudi, E. Poly (Amido Amine) Dendrimer Based Membranes for Wastewater Treatment – A Critical Review. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023, 273, 118665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.118665.Search in Google Scholar

153. Yin, Y.; Hu, B.; Yuan, X.; Cai, L.; Gao, H.; Yang, Q. Nanogel: A Versatile Nano-Delivery System for Biomedical Applications. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12 (3). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12030290.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

154. Venkatesan, R.; John, S. R. D. I.; Rajeswari, N. Mechanical and Biological Properties of Chitosan Nanocomposite Films: Effects of POSS Nanoparticles. J. Polym. Mater. 2020, 36 (3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.32381/jpm.2019.36.03.6.Search in Google Scholar

155. Muhammad, S.; Niazi, J. H.; Shawuti, S.; Qureshi, A. Functional POSS Based Polyimide Nanocomposite for Enhanced Structural, Thermal, Antifouling and Antibacterial Properties. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 31, 103287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103287.Search in Google Scholar

156. Venkatesan, R.; Vanaraj, R.; Alagumalai, K.; Asrafali, S. P.; Raorane, C. J.; Raj, V.; Kim, S. C. Thermoplastic Starch Composites Reinforced with Functionalized POSS: Fabrication, Characterization, and Evolution of Mechanical, Thermal and Biological Activities. Antibiotics 2022, 11 (10). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101425.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

157. Kamyab, A.; Ghasemi-Ghalebahman, A.; Fereidoon, A.; Khonakdar, H. A. Shape Memory and Mechanical Properties of Polycaprolactone/Polypropylene Carbonate Nanocomposite Blends in the Presence of G-Poss Nanoparticles. Express Polym. Lett. 2021, 15 (5), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2021.40.Search in Google Scholar

158. Moshiul Alam, A. K. M.; Beg, M. D. H.; Yunus, R. M.; Bijarimi, M.; Mina, M. F.; Maria, K. H.; Mieno, T. Modification of Structure and Properties of Well-Dispersed Dendrimer Coated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Polyester Nanocomposites. Polym. Test. 2018, 68, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.005.Search in Google Scholar

159. Kalendova, A.; Kupkova, J.; Urbaskova, M.; Merinska, D. Applications of Clays in Nanocomposites and Ceramics. Minerals 2024, 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.3390/min14010093.Search in Google Scholar

160. Bendaoued, A.; Zahrouni, A.; Messaoud, M.; Harzallah, O.; Bistac, S.; Salhi, R. Understanding the Effect of Nanoparticles TiO2, Al2O3 and SiO2 on Damage Mechanisms of a Polymer Composite. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49 (3), 4160–4167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.298.Search in Google Scholar

161. Rajesh, K.; Crasta, V.; Shetty, B. G.; Bairy, R.; Patil, P. S. Effect of TiO2/ZnO Nanofillers on Structural, Optical and Nonlinear Optical Properties of PVA. Opt. Mater. 2023, 145, 114481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2023.114481.Search in Google Scholar

162. Zhang, C.; Wang, H.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, C. Significantly Enhanced Energy Storage Density and Efficiency of Sandwich Polymer-Based Composite via Doped MgO and TiO2 Nanofillers. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58 (31), 12724–12735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08809-5.Search in Google Scholar

163. Rajesh, K.; Crasta, V.; Shetty, B. G.; Bairy, R.; Patil, P. S. Effect of TiO2/ZnO Nanofillers on Structural, Optical and Nonlinear Optical Properties of PVA. Opt. Mater. 2023, 145, 114481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2023.114481.Search in Google Scholar

164. Ain, Q. U.; Wani, M. F.; Sehgal, R.; Singh, M. K. Mechanical and Viscoelastic Characterization of Al2O3 Based Polymer Nanocomposites: An Experimental and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Approach. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2024, 239, 112955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.112955.Search in Google Scholar

165. Ain, Q. U.; Wani, M. F.; Sehgal, R.; Singh, M. K. Role of Al2O3 Reinforcements in Polymer-Based Nanocomposites for Enhanced Nanomechanical Properties: Time-dependent Modeling of Creep and Stress Relaxation. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50 (18), 33817–33838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.06.201.Search in Google Scholar

166. Abdel-Amir, A. H.; Habeeb, M. A. Fast and Simple Fabrication of Ternary PVA/CeO2/SiC Nanocomposites for Optoelectronic and Antimicrobial Applications. Silicon 2024, 16 (6), 2703–2717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-024-02874-4.Search in Google Scholar

167. Migdadi, A. B.; Ahmad, A. A.; Alsaad, A. M.; Telfah, A. S. Optoelectronic and Thermal Characterization of PMMA-MWCNTs Nanocomposite Thin Films Incorporated by ZrO2 NPs. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022, 33 (8), 5087–5104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-07699-8.Search in Google Scholar

168. Ling, Y. F.; Zhang, P.; Wang, J.; Shi, Y. Effect of Sand Size on Mechanical Performance of Cement-Based Composite Containing PVA Fibers and Nano-SiO2. Materials 2020, 13 (2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020325.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

169. Shen, X.; Zheng, Q.; Kim, J. K. Rational Design of Two-Dimensional Nanofillers for Polymer Nanocomposites toward Multifunctional Applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2021, 115, 100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100708.Search in Google Scholar

170. Sanusi, O. M.; Benelfellah, A.; Aït Hocine, N. Clays and Carbon Nanotubes as Hybrid Nanofillers in Thermoplastic-Based Nanocomposites – A Review. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 185, 105408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2019.105408.Search in Google Scholar

171. Stefanescu, E. A.; Daranga, C.; Stefanescu, C. Insight into the Broad Field of Polymer Nanocomposites: From Carbon Nanotubes to Clay Nanoplatelets, via Metal Nanoparticles. Materials 2009, 2 (4), 2095–2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2042095.Search in Google Scholar

172. Beryl, J. R.; Xavier, J. R. Halloysite for Clay–Polymer Nanocomposites: Effects of Nanofillers on the Anti-corrosion, Mechanical, Microstructure, and Flame-Retardant Properties—A Review. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58 (27), 10943–10974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08710-1.Search in Google Scholar

173. El-naggar, A. M.; Heiba, Z. K.; Kamal, A. M.; Bakr Mohamed, M. Impact of ZnMn2O4/CdS Nanocomposite on the Structural, Optical and Dielectric Characteristics of PMMA/PEO Blend. Results Phys. 2024, 56, 107323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107323.Search in Google Scholar

174. Alsulami, Q. A.; Rajeh, A. Structural, Thermal, Optical Characterizations of Polyaniline/Polymethyl Methacrylate Composite Doped by Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles as an Application in Optoelectronic Devices. Opt. Mater. 2022, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111820.Search in Google Scholar

175. Boonyarattanakalin, K.; Rattan, P.; Songpanit, M.; Chutipaijit, S.; Okumura, H.; Ishihara, K. N.; Mekprasart, W.; Pecharapa, W. The Effect of Polyvinyl Alcohol Addition on the Optical Properties and Oxygen Detection Performance of Titanium Dioxide and Methylene Blue Nanocomposite Colorimetric Indicators. Polymers 2024, 16 (10), 1400. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16101400.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

176. Hassan, T.; Salam, A.; Khan, A.; Khan, S. U.; Khanzada, H.; Wasim, M.; Khan, M. Q.; Kim, I. S. Functional Nanocomposites and Their Potential Applications: A Review. J. Polym. Res. 2021, 28 (2), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02408-1.Search in Google Scholar

177. Timothy, A. A.; Jaiyeola, C. O.; Ibrahim Oresegun, O.; Dolapo Olorunfemi, A.; Abdul-Rahman, M. I.; Babalola, K. O.; Babalola, O. T. Ai and Nanotechnology Integration in the Development of Biodegradable Food Packaging Materials. Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch. 2025, 14 (1), 726–736. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.14.1.0119.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-12-11
Accepted: 2025-03-24
Published Online: 2025-05-06
Published in Print: 2025-07-28

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 6.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2024-0248/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOooryB07z1_8Cu0TFnhLtX6-vbq316xsk8vl04BlYhKm9BEKb7gy
Scroll to top button