Home Experimental investigations on compressive, impact and prediction of stress-strain of fly ash-geopolymer and portland cement concrete
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Experimental investigations on compressive, impact and prediction of stress-strain of fly ash-geopolymer and portland cement concrete

  • Nagajothi S ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Elavenil S
Published/Copyright: August 3, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The recent technology of geopolymer concrete is a substitute material for ordinary portland cement concrete which is produced from the polycondensation reaction of aluminosilicate materials with alkaline activator solutions. The cost of river sand is high since the demand for the same is also high. Manufactured sand is used as a replacement material for river sand in geopolymer concrete. This paper mainly focuses to find the properties of fly ash (FA) – based geopolymer concrete under ambient cured temperature like compressive strength, stress strain behaviour, modulus of elasticity, Poission’s ratio and impact resistance. The result of geopolymer concrete is compared with ordinary portland cement concrete. The elasticity modulus and Poission’s ratio of geopolymer concrete are lower than conventional concrete. The Stress-strain behaviour of geopolymer concrete is similar to conventional concrete. The impact resistance of geopolymer concrete is very good when compared with conventional concrete.


Corresponding author: Nagajothi S, School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai Campus, Chennai 600127, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge M.Neelamegam, Former Scientist of SERC-CSIR, Chennai for his remarkable guidance, support and valuable suggestions. The authors would like to acknowledge the management of Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India for their encouragement and support rendered to take this research forward.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Malhotra, V. M. ACI Conc. J. 2000, 1147–1165.Search in Google Scholar

2. Davidovits, J. Soft mineralogy and geopolymers. In Proceedings of the Geopolymer 88, International Conference, The Universite de Technologie, Compiegn, France, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

3. Turner, L. K., Collins, F. G. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 43, 125–130, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023Search in Google Scholar

4. Kou, S. C., Poon, C. S. J. Sustainable Cem.-Based Mater. 2013, 2, 43–57, http://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2013.766400.10.1080/21650373.2013.766400Search in Google Scholar

5. Hardjito, D., Wallah, S. E., Sumajouw, D. M., Rangan, B. V. Am. Concr. Inst. 2004, 101, 467–472.Search in Google Scholar

6. Davidovits, J. Geopolymer, green chemistry and sustainable development solutions. In Proceedings of the World Congress Geopolymer, Geopolymer Institute, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

7. Li, Z., Liu, S. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2007, 19, 470–474, http://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2007)19:6(470).10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:6(470)Search in Google Scholar

8. Nath, P., Sarker, P. K. Geopolymer concrete for ambient curing condition. Proc of Australian Structural Engineering Conference: The Past, Present and Future of Structural Engineering, Engineers Australia: Barton, Australia, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

9. Rajamane, N. P. Studies on development of ambient temperature cured Fly ash & GGBS based Geopolymer concretes. Ph.D. thesis; VTU: Belgaum, India, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

10. Ashraf, M. A., Maah, M. J., Yusoff, I., Wajid, A., Mahmood, K. S and mining effects, causes and concerns; a case study from Bestari Jaya, Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia. Sci. Res. Essays 2011, 25, 4095–4104. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE10.690.Search in Google Scholar

11. Sreenivasa, G. Use of Manufactured Sand in Concrete and Construction an Alternative to River Sand; NBMCW: India, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

12. Foong, K. Y., Alengaram, U. J., Jumaat, M. Z., Mo, K. H. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A. 2015, 16, 59–69, http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.a1400175.10.1631/jzus.A1400175Search in Google Scholar

13. Fernandez-Jiminez, A. M., Palomo, A., Lopez-Hombrados, C. ACI Mater. J. 2006, 103, 106–112.Search in Google Scholar

14. Nguyen, K. T., Ahn, N., Le, T. A., Lee, K. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 106, 65–77, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.033.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.033Search in Google Scholar

15. Olivia, M., Nikraz, H. Mater. De. 2012, 36, 191–198, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.036.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.036Search in Google Scholar

16. Albitar, M., Visintin, P., Mohamed Ali, M. S., Drechslr, M. KSCE J. Civil Eng. 2015, 19, 1445–1455, http://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-1254-z.10.1007/s12205-014-1254-zSearch in Google Scholar

17. Khadiraniakar, R. B., Shankar, H., Sanni. Current Adv. Civ. Eng. 2014, 2, 44–47.Search in Google Scholar

18. Vora, P. R., Urmil, V. D. Procedia Eng. 2013, 51, 210–219, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.030.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.030Search in Google Scholar

19. Nagajothi, S., Elavenil, S. J. Mech. Behav. Mater., 2018, 20180019. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2018-0019.Search in Google Scholar

20. Davidovits, J. Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications, 3rd ed.; Institute geopolymer: France, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

21. Nagajothi, S., Elavenil, S. Silicon, 12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00203-8.Search in Google Scholar

22. Neville, A. M. Properties of Concrete, 4th ed.; Wiley: New York, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

23. Duxson, P., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Mallicoat, S. W., Kriven, W. M., Van Deventer, J. S. J. Coll. Surf. A.Physiochem. Eng. ASP 2005, 269, 47–58, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060Search in Google Scholar

24. Standards Australia A. S. 3600. Methods of Testing Concrete-Determination of the Static Chord Modulus of Elasticity and Poission’s Ratio of Concrete Specimens; Standards Australia A. S.: Australia, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

25. Hardjito, D., Rangan, B. V. Research Report GC-1; Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology: Perth, Australia, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

26. ACI Committee 363, State of the Art Report on High Strength Concrete, American Concrete Institute: Detroit, USA, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-03-06
Accepted: 2020-05-30
Published Online: 2020-08-03
Published in Print: 2020-08-27

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2020-0036/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button