Home Effects of high-efficiency infrared heating on fiber compatibility and weldline tensile properties of injection-molded long-glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide-66 composites
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effects of high-efficiency infrared heating on fiber compatibility and weldline tensile properties of injection-molded long-glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide-66 composites

  • Po-Wei Huang and Hsin-Shu Peng EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 24, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Glass fiber composites are prevalent molded materials used in various fields, including aviation engineering, automobile manufacturing, and medical equipment production. The length of a glass fiber affects the mechanical properties of a glass fiber composite. Studies have reported that breakage occurs in long fibers subjected to screw plasticization, injection processes, and geometrical changes in injection molding. Moreover, multigate injection molding can result in weldlines on the final product, consequently reducing its strength. Further exploration is required to determine how product strength is affected by weldlines generated through injection molding with glass fiber composites and how product tensile properties associated with weldlines can be improved. Therefore, this study designed a mold with a vent area and a plug-in mold-surface-heating device to examine changes in the weldlines and tensile properties of long-glass-fiber composite specimens fabricated through injection molding using two melts. The results revealed that fiber length decreased with increasing screw speed; such declines in fiber length affected the tensile strength of the long-glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide-66 composites. In addition, because the arrangement and distribution of the glass fibers were affected by the melt flow rate, melt flow direction, and changes in mold cavity volume, the weldline tensile strength varied with the depth of the vent area. Mold surface heating improved the specimen surface roughness by 5.79% and effectively improved the interfacial adhesion between the fibers and melts, thereby resulting in more favorable weldline tensile strength. This also notably reduced the depth of weldlines produced by the adhesion of two melts.

References

[1] Teuwsen J, Goris S, Osswald T. ANTEC, Conf. Proc., Anaheim, 2017, 63, 626–635.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Tseng H-C, Chang R-Y, Hsu C-H. J. Rheol. 2013, 57, 1597.10.1122/1.4821038Search in Google Scholar

[3] Tseng H-C, Chang V, Hsu C-H. U.S. Patent 2013, 8571828.10.1155/2013/595031Search in Google Scholar

[4] Truckenmuller F, Fritz H-G. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1991, 31, 1316–1329.10.1002/pen.760311806Search in Google Scholar

[5] Grizzo LH, Hage E. Polim. Cienc. Tecnol. 2011, 21, 369–375.10.1590/S0104-14282011005000065Search in Google Scholar

[6] Dai XY, PAGESBates J. Compos. A: Appl. Sci. 2008, 38, 1159–1166.10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.03.013Search in Google Scholar

[7] Karger-Kocsis J. Polypropylene Structure, Blends and Composites: Volume 3 Composites, Chapman and Hall: London, 1995. ISBN: 978-94-010-4233-8; 978-94-011-0523-1.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Toll S, PAGES Andersson O. Polym. Comp. 1993, 14, 116–125.10.1002/pc.750140205Search in Google Scholar

[9] Tseng H-C, Chang R-Y, Hsu C-H. J. Thermoplastic Comp. Mater. 2017, 31, 1204–1218.10.1177/0892705717734605Search in Google Scholar

[10] Hine P, Parveen B, Brands D, Caton-Roseb F. Compos. Part A: Appl. Manuf. 2014, 64, 70–78.10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.017Search in Google Scholar

[11] Wang M-L, Chang R-Y, Hsu C-H. Molding Simulation: Theory and Practice, Hanser Publications: Munich, 2018. ISBN: 1569907323; 9781569907320.10.3139/9781569906200Search in Google Scholar

[12] Liu S-J, Wu J-Y, Chang J-H, Hung S-W. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2000, 40, 1256–1262.10.1002/pen.11253Search in Google Scholar

[13] Rubin II. Injection Molding: Theory and Practice, Wiley Interscience: New York, 2013. ISBN-10: 047174445X; ISBN-13: 978-0471744450.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Tadmor Z, Gogos CG. Principles of Polymer Processing, Wiley: New York, 1979. ISBN: 0471843202 9780471843207.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Chookaew W, Mingbunjurdsuk J, Jittham P, Na Ranong N, Patcharaphun S. Energy Proc. 2013, 34, 767–774.10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.812Search in Google Scholar

[16] Meddad A, Fisa B. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1995, 35, 893–901.10.1002/pen.760351103Search in Google Scholar

[17] Fellahi S, Fisa B, Favis BD. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1995, 57, 1319–1332.10.1002/app.1995.070571109Search in Google Scholar

[18] Chen C-S, Chen T-J, Chien R-D, Chen S-C. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Trans. 2007, 34, 448–455.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2007.01.005Search in Google Scholar

[19] Titomanlio G, Piccarolo S, Rallis A. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1989, 29, 209–213.10.1002/pen.760290402Search in Google Scholar

[20] Oppelt T, Schulze J, Stein H, Platzer B. Part 1: Rev. Int. Polym. Sci. Technol. 2018, 30, 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-07-10
Accepted: 2019-11-27
Published Online: 2020-01-24
Published in Print: 2020-01-28

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2019-0211/html
Scroll to top button