Abstract
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fiber samples were irradiated using different gamma radiation doses. The physicochemical and structural properties of the irradiated PET samples, either the pristine sample or the sample chemically modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG), were assessed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The surface morphology and characteristics of the irradiated PET fiber samples were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The pristine and PEG-modified PET fibers were exposed to gamma radiation with doses ranging from 0.5 to 20 kGy. The FTIR analysis results showed certain degradation via irradiation, deduced from a decrease in the intensities of most of the PET original infrared bands. The XRD and DSC analysis results indicated the reduction of crystallinity upon irradiation of pristine and modified PET fibers. Conversely, an improvement in the crystallinity was observed at high doses compared with low doses. The crystallinity of the PEG-modified PET was found to be improved. Two types of morphological changes, wrinkles and small particles, were observed on the PET fiber surface due to gamma irradiation.
Research funding: The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through the Research Groups Program under grant number R.G.P1./72/40.
References
[1] Chikaoui K, Izerrouken M, Djebara M, Abdesselam M. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2017, 130, 431–435.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.10.002Suche in Google Scholar
[2] Nanda P, De SK, Manna S, De U, Tarafdar S. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2010, 268, 73–78.10.1016/j.nimb.2009.09.063Suche in Google Scholar
[3] Apel P. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2003, 208, 11–20.10.1016/S0168-583X(03)00634-7Suche in Google Scholar
[4] Aarya S, Dev K, Shakir M, Ahmed B, Wahab M. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 125, 3575–3581.10.1002/app.36397Suche in Google Scholar
[5] Aarya S, Dev K, Raghuvanshi SK, Krishna J, Wahab M. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 458–462.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.12.023Suche in Google Scholar
[6] Kumar V, Sonkawade R, Chakarvarti S, Singh P, Dhaliwal A. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 652–658.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.02.027Suche in Google Scholar
[7] Forsythe J, Hill D. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2000, 25, 101–136.10.1016/S0079-6700(00)00008-3Suche in Google Scholar
[8] Mallick B, Patel T, Behera R, Sarangi S, Sahu S, Choudhury R. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2006, 248, 305–310.10.1016/j.nimb.2006.04.153Suche in Google Scholar
[9] Mishra R, Tripathy S, Sinha D, Dwivedi K, Ghosh S, Khathing D, Müller M, Fink D, Chung W. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2000, 168, 59–64.10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00829-0Suche in Google Scholar
[10] Bhat N, Naik S. Text. Res. J. 1984, 54, 868–874.10.1177/004051758405401213Suche in Google Scholar
[11] Lungulescu EM. Contributions to the study and characterization of degradation processes of the insulating polymeric materials in high-energy radiation fields (PhD thesis). University of Bucharest Chemistry Faculty Doctoral School in Chemistry: Romania, 2014.Suche in Google Scholar
[12] Evans L. The Large Hadron Collider: A Marvel of Technology. EPFL Press: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2009.Suche in Google Scholar
[13] Dey S, Maulik A, Raha S, Swapan KS, Syam D. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Cosmic Ray Conference, the Astroparticle Physics Conference, Rio de Janeiro, 2013.Suche in Google Scholar
[14] Kumar V, Sonkawade RG, Chakarvarti SK, Kulriya P, Kant K, Singh NL, Dhaliwal AS. Vacuum 2011, 86, 275–279.10.1016/j.vacuum.2011.07.001Suche in Google Scholar
[15] Kumar V, Ali Y, Sonkawade RG, Dhaliwal AS. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2012, 287, 10–14.10.1016/j.nimb.2012.07.007Suche in Google Scholar
[16] Virendra S, Tejvir S, Amita C, Bandyopadhyay SK, Pintu S, Witte K, Scherer UW, Alok S. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2006, 244, 243–247.10.1016/j.nimb.2005.11.039Suche in Google Scholar
[17] Mallick B. Appl. Phys. A 2015, 119, 653–657.10.1007/s00339-015-9009-3Suche in Google Scholar
[18] Mallick B, Behera RC, Patel T. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2005, 28, 593–598.10.1007/BF02706348Suche in Google Scholar
[19] Mallick B, Patel T, Behera RC. Indian J. Phys. 2006, 80, 621–624.Suche in Google Scholar
[20] Singh R, Samra KS, Kumar R, Singh L. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2008, 77, 575–580.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2007.06.014Suche in Google Scholar
[21] Saeedeh M, Abdellah A, Charles D. Poly. Eng. Sci. 2010, 50, 1956–1968.10.1002/pen.21727Suche in Google Scholar
[22] Wei C, Thomas JM. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 3648–3655.10.1021/ma9710601Suche in Google Scholar
[23] Singh N, Sharma A, Avasthi D. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2003, 206, 1120–1123.10.1016/S0168-583X(03)00935-2Suche in Google Scholar
[24] Yue QF, Wang CX, Zhang LN, Ni Y, Jin XY. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2011, 96, 399–403.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.12.020Suche in Google Scholar
[25] Papaleo R, De Araujo M, Livi R. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 1992, 65, 442–446.10.1016/0168-583X(92)95082-3Suche in Google Scholar
[26] Steckenreiter T, Balanzat E, Fuess H, Trautmann C. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 1997, 131, 159–166.10.1016/S0168-583X(97)00364-9Suche in Google Scholar
[27] Ramola R, Chandra S, Negi A, Rana J, Annapoorni S, Sonkawade R, Kulriya P, Srivastava A. Phys. B Condensed Matter 2009, 404, 26–31.10.1016/j.physb.2008.09.033Suche in Google Scholar
[28] Zhudi Z, Wenxue Y, Xinfang C. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2002, 65, 173–176.10.1016/S0969-806X(02)00194-9Suche in Google Scholar
[29] Guzman A, Carlson J, Bares J, Pronko P. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 1985, 7, 468–472.10.1016/0168-583X(85)90414-8Suche in Google Scholar
[30] Ciesla K, Starosta W. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 1995, 105, 115–119.10.1016/0168-583X(95)00822-5Suche in Google Scholar
[31] Höhne G, Hemminger WF, Flammersheim HJ. Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Springer Science & Business Media: Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013.Suche in Google Scholar
[32] Menchaca-Campos C, Barrera-Díaz C, Martínez-Barrera G, Gencel O. Matrix 2012, 1, 15–21.10.1155/2013/389162Suche in Google Scholar
©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Synthesis, characterization and low energy photon attenuation studies of bone tissue substitutes
- The effect of oxygen plasma pretreatment on the properties of mussel-inspired polydopamine-decorated polyurethane nanofibers
- Effects of selected bleaching agents on the functional and structural properties of orange albedo starch-based bioplastics
- Study on the thermal and structural properties of gamma-irradiated polyethylene terephthalate fibers
- Preparation and assembly
- Stereocomplex electrospun fibers from high molecular weight of poly(L-lactic acid) and poly(D-lactic acid)
- Dual-wavelength fluorescent anti-counterfeiting fibers with skin-core structure
- Graphene oxide and zinc oxide decorated chitosan nanocomposite biofilms for packaging applications
- Supramolecular adsorption of cyclodextrin/polyvinyl alcohol film for purification of organic wastewater
- Engineering and processing
- Effects of high-efficiency infrared heating on fiber compatibility and weldline tensile properties of injection-molded long-glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide-66 composites
- Toward the development of polyethylene photocatalytic degradation
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Synthesis, characterization and low energy photon attenuation studies of bone tissue substitutes
- The effect of oxygen plasma pretreatment on the properties of mussel-inspired polydopamine-decorated polyurethane nanofibers
- Effects of selected bleaching agents on the functional and structural properties of orange albedo starch-based bioplastics
- Study on the thermal and structural properties of gamma-irradiated polyethylene terephthalate fibers
- Preparation and assembly
- Stereocomplex electrospun fibers from high molecular weight of poly(L-lactic acid) and poly(D-lactic acid)
- Dual-wavelength fluorescent anti-counterfeiting fibers with skin-core structure
- Graphene oxide and zinc oxide decorated chitosan nanocomposite biofilms for packaging applications
- Supramolecular adsorption of cyclodextrin/polyvinyl alcohol film for purification of organic wastewater
- Engineering and processing
- Effects of high-efficiency infrared heating on fiber compatibility and weldline tensile properties of injection-molded long-glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide-66 composites
- Toward the development of polyethylene photocatalytic degradation