Experimental study on influence of molding parameters on self-reinforcement characteristics of polymer co-injection molding
-
Yong Lu
,
Minjie Wang
Abstract
In this paper, self-reinforced samples with different mechanical properties were obtained by adjusting the molding parameters by co-injection molding technology, and the micro-morphology of these samples was observed. Then, using structured statistical methods, the analysis of variance and response surface methodology were used to study the effects of various molding variables on the morphology and properties of the materials, and to determine the most important molding variables and their interaction relationships. Finally, the associated experimental data were fitted by the least square minimization program, and the parameters in the fitting equation were dimensionless to obtain the correlative dimensionless equation. The purpose was to establish the mechanism model of the influence of the molding parameters on the co-injection self-reinforced sample and to objectively analyze its mechanism. It was found that the melt temperature is the most important factor affecting the morphology and mechanical properties. The highly oriented skin thickness is the most important factor in determining the tensile properties of the sample. The change in crystallinity is the most important factor in relation to the elastic modulus. Through the establishment of the relevant dimensionless equations, the theoretical study on the tensile strength and elastic modulus of the co-injection self-reinforced samples of the molding parameters was preliminarily realized.
Research funding: We would like to express our great thanks to National Natural Science Foundation of China (51475071, Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809).
References
[1] Fakirov S. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2013, 298, 9–32.10.1002/mame.201200226Search in Google Scholar
[2] Matabola KP, De Vries AR, Moolman FS. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 6213–6222.10.1007/s10853-009-3792-1Search in Google Scholar
[3] Hine PJ, Unwin AP, Ward IM. Polymer 2011, 52, 2891–2898.10.1016/j.polymer.2011.04.026Search in Google Scholar
[4] Guo JM, Wu SJ, Ouyang C, Shen KZ. China Plastic Ind. 2003, 31, 28–30.Search in Google Scholar
[5] Zhang HP, Zhuang XM, Yan X, Gao XL. High Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2004, 20, 121–124.Search in Google Scholar
[6] Deringer T, Gröschel C, Drummer D. J. Polym. Eng. 2018, 38, 73–81.10.1515/polyeng-2016-0409Search in Google Scholar
[7] Christopher F, Ariane J, Guido P, Dietmar D. J. Polym. Eng. 2018, 38, 475.10.1515/polyeng-2017-0100Search in Google Scholar
[8] Wang J, Chen JN, Dai P. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2012, 4, 104–107.10.1179/175355511X13240279339842Search in Google Scholar
[9] Wang K, Chen F, Li Z, Fu Q. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 891–920.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.012Search in Google Scholar
[10] Favaro MM, Branciforti MC, Bretas RES. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2009, 20, 940–949.10.1002/pat.1343Search in Google Scholar
[11] Pantani R, Coccorullo I, Speranza V, Titomanlio G. Polymer 2007, 48, 2778–2790.10.1016/j.polymer.2007.03.007Search in Google Scholar
[12] Hu J, Gao X, Chen Z, Shen K, Deng CJ. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 127, 1198–1202.10.1002/app.37619Search in Google Scholar
[13] Barbosa CN, Simoes R, Franzen M, Viana JC. J. Mater. Sci. 2013, 48, 2597–2607.10.1007/s10853-012-7052-4Search in Google Scholar
[14] Cermak R, Obadal M, Ponizil P, Polaskova M, Stoklasa K, Heckova J. J. Eur. Polym. 2006, 42, 2185–2195.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.03.014Search in Google Scholar
[15] van Erp TB, Govaert LE, Peters GWM. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2013, 298, 348–358.10.1002/mame.201200116Search in Google Scholar
[16] Shinohara Y, Yamazoe K, Sakurai T, Kimata S, Maruyama T, Amemiya Y. Macromolecules, 2012, 45, 1398–1407.10.1021/ma202178rSearch in Google Scholar
[17] Yu X, Wu H, Li J, Guo S, Qiu J. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2009, 49, 703–712.10.1002/pen.21302Search in Google Scholar
[18] Ogbonna CI, Kalay G, Allen PS, Bevis MJ. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1995, 58, 21.10.1002/app.1995.070581126Search in Google Scholar
[19] Shen KZ, Hu WJ, Xiang ZS, Chen J, Wu SJ. High Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2002, 18, 145.Search in Google Scholar
[20] Shen KZ, Jiang CD, Li XY, Fang BJ, Chen LM. Polym. Bull. 2001, 3, 1.Search in Google Scholar
[21] Li YB, Gao XQ, Liao YH, Shen KZ. China Adhes. 2003, 17, 77.Search in Google Scholar
[22] Alcock B, Cabrera N, Barkoula NM, Loos J, Peijs TJ. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 104, 118–129.10.1002/app.24588Search in Google Scholar
[23] Yan RJ, Hine PJ, Ward IM, Olley RH, Bassett DC. Mater. Sci. 1997, 32, 4821–4832.10.1023/A:1018647401619Search in Google Scholar
[24] Devaux XE, Caze C. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1999, 59, 459–466.10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00090-6Search in Google Scholar
[25] Vaisman L, Gonzalez MF, Marom G. Polymer 2003, 44, 1229–1235.10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00848-0Search in Google Scholar
[26] Hine PJ, Ward IM. J. Mater. Sci. 1993, 28, 316–324.10.1007/BF00357801Search in Google Scholar
[27] Dong Y, Yang G. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 4639–4644.10.1007/s10853-009-3708-0Search in Google Scholar
[28] Maity J, Jacob C, Das CK, Alam S, Singh RPl. Polym. Test. 2008, 27, 581–590.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.03.001Search in Google Scholar
[29] Viana JC, Billon N, Cunha AM. In Annual Conference of the Polymer Processing Society, Guimaraes, Portugal, June 2002, 105, 16–20.Search in Google Scholar
[30] Mykhaylyk OO, Parnell AJ, Pryke A, Fairclough JPA. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 5260–5270.10.1021/ma3004289Search in Google Scholar
[31] Viana JC. Polymer 2004, 45, 993–1005.10.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.001Search in Google Scholar
[32] Viana JC, Cunha AM, Billon N. Polymer 2002, 43, 4185–4196.10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00253-7Search in Google Scholar
[33] Cermak R, Obada M, Ponizil P, Polaskova M, Stoklasa K, Lengalova A. Eur. Polym. J. 2005, 41, 1838–1845.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.02.020Search in Google Scholar
[34] Machado G, Denardin, Kinast ELJ, Goncalves MC, de Luca MA, Teixieira SR, Samios D. Eur. Polym. J. 2005, 41, 129–138.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.08.011Search in Google Scholar
[35] Zipper P, Janosi A, Geymayer W, Ingolic E, Fleischmann E. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1996, 36, 467–482.10.1002/pen.10433Search in Google Scholar
©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- The effect of unidirectional shear flow-induced orientation on foaming properties of polypropylene
- An investigation on electro-induced shape memory performances of CE/EP/CB/SCF composites applied for deployable structure
- Nanocomposite film with green synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles and hydrophobic polydimethylsiloxane polymer: synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial test
- Preparation and assembly
- Binary solvent systems for durable self-adhesive conductive hydrogels
- Development of surface properties of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene film using side-chain crystalline block copolymers
- Highly porous, fast responding acrylamide hydrogels through emulsion polymerization using coconut oil
- Engineering and processing
- Multizone barrel temperature control of the eccentric rotor extrusion process
- The influence of mold temperature on thermoset in-mold forming
- Innovative γ rays irradiated styrene butadiene rubber/reclaimed waste tire rubber blends: a comparative study using mechano-chemical and microwave devulcanizing methods
- Experimental study on influence of molding parameters on self-reinforcement characteristics of polymer co-injection molding
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- The effect of unidirectional shear flow-induced orientation on foaming properties of polypropylene
- An investigation on electro-induced shape memory performances of CE/EP/CB/SCF composites applied for deployable structure
- Nanocomposite film with green synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles and hydrophobic polydimethylsiloxane polymer: synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial test
- Preparation and assembly
- Binary solvent systems for durable self-adhesive conductive hydrogels
- Development of surface properties of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene film using side-chain crystalline block copolymers
- Highly porous, fast responding acrylamide hydrogels through emulsion polymerization using coconut oil
- Engineering and processing
- Multizone barrel temperature control of the eccentric rotor extrusion process
- The influence of mold temperature on thermoset in-mold forming
- Innovative γ rays irradiated styrene butadiene rubber/reclaimed waste tire rubber blends: a comparative study using mechano-chemical and microwave devulcanizing methods
- Experimental study on influence of molding parameters on self-reinforcement characteristics of polymer co-injection molding
