Abstract
In this study, poly(lactic acid) (PLA) matrix bio-composites reinforced with various quantities of sisal fibers (SFs) (from 10% to 50% in weight) were fabricated by using a self-made vane mixer, which can generate continuous elongation flow. The morphology, crystallization, and mechanical properties of PLA/SF bio-composites under continuous elongation flow were investigated. Scanning electron microscopic images showed that SFs were uniformly dispersed in the matrix and oriented along the extrusion direction. Meanwhile, it was found that the diameter of SFs decreased from 250 to 20 μm, which certified that continuous elongation flow remarkably affected the separation of elementary fibers from fiber bundles. Wide-angle X-ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry measurements indicated that the addition of SFs promoted the crystallization of PLA as well as increased the crystallinity of PLA. The mechanical tests exhibited that both impact strength and tensile modulus were significantly enhanced (about 64% and 94.63%, respectively) with SFs loading at 40%, which was due to the well dispersion and separation of elementary fibers.
Funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 51435005
Funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 51505153
Funding statement: We acknowledge the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51435005); the National Instrumentation Program (grant no. 2012YQ230043); the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2016YFB0302301); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51505153); the PhD Start-up Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (grant no. 2016A030310429); the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (grant no. 201607010240); and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (grant nos. 2014B090921006, 2015B090904004).
References
[1] Sahari J, Sapuan SM. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2012, 30, 166–174.Search in Google Scholar
[2] Emadian SM, Onay TT, Demirel B. Waste Manage. 2017, 59, 526–536.10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] Spinella S, Cai J, Samuel C, Zhu J, Mccallum SA, Habibi Y, Raquez JM, Dubois P, Gross RA. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 1818–1826.10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00394Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] Mustapa IR. J. Polym. Eng. 2014, 34, 895–903.10.1515/polyeng-2013-0161Search in Google Scholar
[5] Orue A, Jauregi A, Unsuain U, Labidi J, Eceiza A, Arbelaiz A. Compos. Part A – Appl. S. 2016, 84, 186–195.10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.021Search in Google Scholar
[6] Johari AP, Mohanty S, Kurmvanshi SK, Nayak SK. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1619–1629.10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01563Search in Google Scholar
[7] Ahmad EEM, Luyt AS. Polym. Compos. 2012, 33, 1025–1032.10.1002/pc.22236Search in Google Scholar
[8] Yokohara T, Nobukawa S, Yamaguchi M. J. Rheol. 2011, 55, 1205–1218.10.1122/1.3626414Search in Google Scholar
[9] Hsieh CT, Pan YJ, Lou CW, Huang CL, Lin ZI, Liao JM, Lin JH. Fiber Polym. 2016, 17, 615–623.10.1007/s12221-016-5922-0Search in Google Scholar
[10] Akindoyo, Beg JOH, Ghazali MD, Islam S, Remanul M. J. Polym. Eng. 2016, 36, 489–497.10.1515/polyeng-2015-0215Search in Google Scholar
[11] Sarasini F, Tirillò J, Puglia D, Kenny JM, Dominici F, Santulli C, Tofani M, Santis RD. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 23798–23809.10.1039/C5RA00832HSearch in Google Scholar
[12] Bajpai PK, Singh I, Madaan J. Wear 2013, 297, 829–840.10.1016/j.wear.2012.10.019Search in Google Scholar
[13] Jayavani S, Deka H, Varghese TO, Nayak SK. Polym. Comp. 2016, 37, 3296–3309.10.1002/pc.23529Search in Google Scholar
[14] Phiri G, Khoathane MC, Sadiku ER. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2013, 33, 283–293.10.1177/0731684413511548Search in Google Scholar
[15] Rajesh G, Prasad AR, Gupta A. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2015, 34, 951–962.10.1177/0731684415584784Search in Google Scholar
[16] Ye C, Ma G, Fu W, Wu H. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2015, 34, 1–13.10.1177/0731684415579090Search in Google Scholar
[17] Hou X, Sun F, Yan D, Xu H, Dong Z, Li Q, Yang Y. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 83, 454–462.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.018Search in Google Scholar
[18] Kaewpirom S, Worrarat C. Fiber. Polym. 2014, 15, 1469–1477.10.1007/s12221-014-1469-0Search in Google Scholar
[19] Mittal V, Sinha S. J. Polym. Eng. 2015, 35, 545–550.10.1515/polyeng-2014-0270Search in Google Scholar
[20] Islam MR, Rivai M, Gupta A, Beg MDH. J. Polym. Eng. 2014, 35, 135–143.10.1515/polyeng-2014-0132Search in Google Scholar
[21] Arao Y, Fujiura T, Itani S, Tanaka T. Compos. Part B – Eng. 2015, 68, 200–206.10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.032Search in Google Scholar
[22] Abdennadher A, Vincent M, Budtova T. J. Rheol. 2016, 60, 191–201.10.1122/1.4938224Search in Google Scholar
[23] Mantia FPL, Arrigo R, Morreale M. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 54, 11–17.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.02.007Search in Google Scholar
[24] Jia S, Qu J, Chen R, Wu C, Huang Z, Zhai S, Liu W, Feng Y. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2013, 54, 2292–2300.10.1002/pen.23781Search in Google Scholar
[25] Park JH, Joo YL. Soft Matter 2014, 10, 3494–3505.10.1039/c4sm00096jSearch in Google Scholar
[26] Shaukat A, Kaushal M, Sharma A, Joshi YM. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 10107–10114.10.1039/c2sm26371hSearch in Google Scholar
[27] Wang L, Yin X, He G, Feng Y, Qu J. J. Thermoplast. Compos. 2018, 31, 784–802.10.1177/0892705717720972Search in Google Scholar
[28] Sang DP, Todo M, Arakawa K, Koganemaru M. Polymer 2006, 47, 1357–1363.10.1016/j.polymer.2005.12.046Search in Google Scholar
[29] Qu JP, Liu LM, Tan B, Liu SR, Chen HX, Feng YH. Polym. Compos. 2012, 33, 185–191.10.1002/pc.21261Search in Google Scholar
[30] Naschie MSE. J. Franklin I. 1993, 330, 183–198.10.1016/0016-0032(93)90029-TSearch in Google Scholar
[31] Kalish JP, Zeng X, Yang X, Hsu SL. Polymer 2011, 52, 3431–3436.10.1016/j.polymer.2011.05.009Search in Google Scholar
[32] Kalish JP, Aou K, Yang X, Hsu SL. Polymer 2011, 52, 814–821.10.1016/j.polymer.2010.12.042Search in Google Scholar
[33] Zhang J, Tashiro K, Tsuji H, Domb AJ. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 1352–1357.10.1021/ma0706071Search in Google Scholar
[34] Chen RY, Zou W, Wu CR, Jia SK, Huang Z, Zhang GZ, Yang ZT, Qu JP. Polym. Test. 2014, 34, 1–9.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.12.009Search in Google Scholar
[35] Wu JH, Kuo MC, Chen CW, Chen CW, Kuan PH, Wang YJ, Jhang SY. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 129, 3007–3018.10.1002/app.39029Search in Google Scholar
[36] Liang YY, Xu JZ, Li Y, Zhong GJ, Wang R, Li ZM. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 7128–7136.10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01317Search in Google Scholar
[37] Nyambo C, Mohanty AK, Misra M. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 1654–1660.10.1021/bm1003114Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[38] Xu H, Xie L, Chen YH, Huang HD, Xu JZ, Zhong GJ, Hsiao BS, Li ZM. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 1619–1629.10.1021/sc4003032Search in Google Scholar
[39] Asaithambi B, Ganesan G, Kumar SA. Fiber Polym. 2014, 15, 847–854.10.1007/s12221-014-0847-ySearch in Google Scholar
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Interpenetrating polymer network adhesive bonding of PEEK to titanium for aerospace application
- NanoSiO2 strengthens and toughens epoxy resin/basalt fiber composites by acting as a nano-mediator
- Structure and properties of PA6-66/γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-modified clay nanocomposites prepared by in situ polymerization
- Tribological and mechanical properties of polyamide-11/halloysite nanotube nanocomposites
- Dynamic and creep analysis of polyvinyl alcohol based films blended with starch and protein
- Effect of addition of silicone oil on the rheology of fumed silica and polyethylene glycol shear thickening suspension
- Thermal degradation kinetics of oxo-degradable PP/PLA blends
- Preparation and assembly
- Comparative studies of energy saving polymers and fabrication of high performance transparent polymer by solvent bonding
- Preparation and characterization of poly(lactic acid)/sisal fiber bio-composites under continuous elongation flow
- Graphene oxide modification for enhancing high-density polyethylene properties: a comparison between solvent reaction and melt mixing
- Comparison of two encapsulation systems of UV stabilizers on the UV protection efficiency of wood clear coats
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Interpenetrating polymer network adhesive bonding of PEEK to titanium for aerospace application
- NanoSiO2 strengthens and toughens epoxy resin/basalt fiber composites by acting as a nano-mediator
- Structure and properties of PA6-66/γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-modified clay nanocomposites prepared by in situ polymerization
- Tribological and mechanical properties of polyamide-11/halloysite nanotube nanocomposites
- Dynamic and creep analysis of polyvinyl alcohol based films blended with starch and protein
- Effect of addition of silicone oil on the rheology of fumed silica and polyethylene glycol shear thickening suspension
- Thermal degradation kinetics of oxo-degradable PP/PLA blends
- Preparation and assembly
- Comparative studies of energy saving polymers and fabrication of high performance transparent polymer by solvent bonding
- Preparation and characterization of poly(lactic acid)/sisal fiber bio-composites under continuous elongation flow
- Graphene oxide modification for enhancing high-density polyethylene properties: a comparison between solvent reaction and melt mixing
- Comparison of two encapsulation systems of UV stabilizers on the UV protection efficiency of wood clear coats