Home Experimental and numerical determination of compressive mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotube reinforced polymer
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Experimental and numerical determination of compressive mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotube reinforced polymer

  • Kamran Alasvand Zarasvand and Hossein Golestanian EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 19, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper, experimental and numerical methods were used to determine compressive mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) reinforced epoxy. Standard samples with varying weight fractions of MWCNTs were prepared and were tested in compression. Nanocomposite modulus of elasticity, yield strength and compressive strength were determined experimentally. Experimental results show that incorporation of CNTs improves yield and compressive strengths of the epoxy resin to a large extent. Also, numerical simulation of nanocomposites was conducted in ABAQUS finite element (FE) software. In these simulations, the effects of the interface strength between individual nanotubes and between the outer nanotube and matrix were also investigated. Two different mechanisms were used to model these interfaces. In one set of the models, connector constraints were used as the interface. In the second set, an interface consisting of thin shells surrounding the nanotubes was used. The results of this investigation suggest that nanocomposite longitudinal modulus increases with increasing interface strength. Also, numerical results suggest that the connector model predicts values lower than the thin shell interphase model. Finally, experimental and numerical results were compared and a good correlation is observed between the results.

References

[1] Gkikas G, Barkoula NM, Paipetis AS. Compos. Part B 2012, 43, 2697–2705.10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.070Search in Google Scholar

[2] Srivastava VK. Mater. Des. 2012, 39, 432–436.10.1016/j.matdes.2012.02.039Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ajayan PM, Schadler LS, Giannaris C, Rubio A. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 750.10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:10<750::AID-ADMA750>3.0.CO;2-6Search in Google Scholar

[4] Lourie O, Wagner HD. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 3527.10.1063/1.122825Search in Google Scholar

[5] Schadler LS, Giannaris SC, Ajayan PM. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 3842.10.1063/1.122911Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bai JB, Allaoui A. Compos. Part A 2003, 34A, 689–694.10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00140-4Search in Google Scholar

[7] Rahmanian S, Suraya AR, Shazed MA, Zahari R, Zainudin ES. Mater. Des. 2014, 60, 34–40.10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.039Search in Google Scholar

[8] Montazeri A, Javadpour J, Khavandi A, Tcharkhtchi A, Mohajeri A. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 4202–4208.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.018Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ayatollahi MR, Shadlou S, Shokrieh MM, Chitsazzadeh M. Polym. Test. 2011, 30, 548–556.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.04.008Search in Google Scholar

[10] Xu LR, Bhamidipati V, Zhong WH, Li J, Lukehart CM. Compos. Mater. 2004, 38, 1563–1582.10.1177/0021998304043758Search in Google Scholar

[11] Maa PC, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim JK. Compos. Part A Rev. 2010, 41, 1345–1367.10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003Search in Google Scholar

[12] Montazeri A, Chitsazzadeh M. Mater. Des. 2014, 56, 500–508.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.013Search in Google Scholar

[13] Chen ZK, Yang JP, Ni QQ, Fu SY, Huang YG. Polym. 2009, 50, 4753–4759.10.1016/j.polymer.2009.08.001Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ghosh PK, Kumar K, Chaudhary N. Compos. Part B 2015, 77, 139–144.10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.028Search in Google Scholar

[15] Joshi P, Upadhyay SH. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 81, 332–338.10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.034Search in Google Scholar

[16] Joshi P, Upadhyay SH. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 87, 267–273.10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.02.029Search in Google Scholar

[17] Giannopoulos GI, Georgantzinos SK, Anifantis NK. Compos. Part B 2010, 41, 594–601.10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.09.023Search in Google Scholar

[18] Weidt D, Figiel L. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 82, 298–309.10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[19] Zuberi MJS, Esat V. Compos. Part B 2015, 71, 1–9.10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.020Search in Google Scholar

[20] Shokrieh MM, Rafiee R. Compos. Struct. 2010, 92, 2415–2420.10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.02.018Search in Google Scholar

[21] Weidt D, Figiel L. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015, 115, 52–59.10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.04.018Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ma P, Jiang G, Chen Q, Cong H, Nie X. Compos. Part B 2015, 69, 526–533.10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.038Search in Google Scholar

[23] Li C, Chou T. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2006, 66, 2409–2414.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.013Search in Google Scholar

[24] Golestanian H, Hamedi M. NANO: Brief Reps. Rev. 2012, 7, 1250041.10.1142/S1793292012500415Search in Google Scholar

[25] Golestanian H, Shojaie M. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2010, 50, 731–736.10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.10.003Search in Google Scholar

[26] ASTM D695-10, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2010. Available at: www.astm.org.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-3-16
Accepted: 2016-6-29
Published Online: 2016-8-19
Published in Print: 2017-5-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2016-0100/html
Scroll to top button