Home Interaction simulation and experimental physico-mechanical analysis of distinct polarity blends of polyethylene and polyvinyl alcohol
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Interaction simulation and experimental physico-mechanical analysis of distinct polarity blends of polyethylene and polyvinyl alcohol

  • Lee Tin Sin EMAIL logo , Soo-Tueen Bee EMAIL logo , Rui-Ren Ang , Tiam-Ting Tee , Siew-Wei Phang and Abdul R. Rahmat
Published/Copyright: December 24, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper aimed to investigate the interaction of distinct polarity polymer blends of polyethylene and polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH). Molecular mechanics and dynamics simulation were employed to determine the stability of polyethylene and PVOH complexes. It was found that the binding energies ΔE for all complexes of polyethylene and PVOH are negative values indicating that the interactions between both components are favorable to achieve a lower energy hierarchy. Such interactions are induced by the high polarity hydroxyl groups of PVOH which caused weak distortion to the dipole moment of inherently non-polar polyethylene. Furthermore, the molecular simulation results were compared with tensile strength, X-ray diffraction and morphology analyses. Tensile strength analysis revealed there was a reduction of magnitude for varying PVOH before achieving a maximum value. Adding small quantities of PVOH in polyethylene as the different polar elements would affect the ordered structure within the blends. Nevertheless, the reduction is insignificant due to the polarity of PVOH which has a slightly distorted polar network of polyethylene. The addition of PVOH (5–15 parts per hundred) into a polyethylene matrix has significantly reduced the crystallinity of the polyethylene matrix by disturbing the highly ordered arrangement structures.


Corresponding authors: Lee Tin Sin and Soo-Tueen Bee, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Genting Kelang, 53300 Setapak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, e-mail: ,

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Research Fund (UTARRF).

References

[1] Singh G, Bhunia H, Bajpai PK, Choudhary V J. Polym. Eng. 2012, 32, 59–66.10.1515/polyeng-2011-0106Search in Google Scholar

[2] Zhang J, Li Y, Zhu Y, Cui M, Jiang X. J. Polym. Eng. 2012, 32, 487–492.10.1515/polyeng-2012-0041Search in Google Scholar

[3] Pospíšil J, Horák Z, Kruliš Z, Nešpůrek S, Kuroda, S. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1999, 65, 405–414.10.1016/S0141-3910(99)00029-4Search in Google Scholar

[4] Shaw MT. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1982, 22, 115–123.10.1002/pen.760220212Search in Google Scholar

[5] Takegoshi K, Ohya Y, Hikichi K. Polym. J. 1993, 25, 59–64.10.1295/polymj.25.59Search in Google Scholar

[6] Jawalkar SS, Aminabhavi TM. Polymer 2006, 47, 8061–8071.10.1016/j.polymer.2006.09.030Search in Google Scholar

[7] Braun D, Böhringer B, Eidam N, Fischer M, Kömmerling S. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 1994, 216, 1–19.10.1002/apmc.1994.052160101Search in Google Scholar

[8] Wang K, Addiego F, Bahlouli N, Ahzi S, Rémond Y, Toniazzo V, Muller R. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 1475–1484.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.005Search in Google Scholar

[9] Sin LT, Rahman WAWA, Rahmat AR, Khan MI. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 79, 224–226.10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.08.003Search in Google Scholar

[10] Rahman WAWA, Sin LT, Rahmat AR, Samad AA. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 81, 805–810.10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.052Search in Google Scholar

[11] Vijayalakshmi K, Bhardwaj VR, Safvan CP, Mathur D. J.Phys. B: Atomic, Mol. Opt. Phys. 1997, 20, 339–347.10.1088/0953-4075/30/10/003Search in Google Scholar

[12] Sin LT, Rahman WAWA, Rahmat AR, Samad AA. Polymer 2010, 51, 1206–1211.10.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.021Search in Google Scholar

[13] Robeson LM. J. Vinyl Tech. 1990, 12, 89–94.10.1002/vnl.730120209Search in Google Scholar

[14] Shen H, Xie B, Yang W, Yang M. Polym. Test. 2013, 32, 1385–1991.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.09.002Search in Google Scholar

[15] Cho DH, Yu W-R, Youk JH, Yoo JH. Eur. Polym. J. 2007, 43, 3562–3572.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.036Search in Google Scholar

[16] Sawatari C, Kondo T. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 1949–1955.10.1021/ma980900oSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Bee S-T, Mok W-R, Sin LT, Tee T-T, Issabayeva G, Rahmat AR. J. Polym. Eng. 2014, 34, 521–529.10.1515/polyeng-2013-0324Search in Google Scholar

[18] Boufassa S, Doufnoune R, Hellati A, Haddaoui N, Gagiao ME. J. Polym. Eng. 33, 589–598.10.1515/polyeng-2013-0048Search in Google Scholar

[19] Li H, Zhang W, Xu W, Zhang X. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 465–469.10.1021/ma990878eSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Wang S, Zhang J, Chen S, Zhu HJ. Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 355, 151–158.10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.06.030Search in Google Scholar

[21] Raabe D, Chen NM, Chen L. Polymer 2004, 45, 8265–8277.10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.045Search in Google Scholar

[22] Riedel R, Toma L, Fasel C, Miehe G.J. Eur. Ceramic. Soc. 2009, 29, 3079–3090.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.05.016Search in Google Scholar

[23] Bee ST, Hassan A, Ratnam CT, Tee TT, Sin LT. Nuc. Inst. Met. Phys. Res. B 2013, 299, 42–50.10.1016/j.nimb.2013.01.040Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-8-20
Accepted: 2014-11-9
Published Online: 2014-12-24
Published in Print: 2015-6-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2014-0232/html
Scroll to top button