Home Mechanical properties of potassium hydroxide-pretreated Christmas palm fiber-reinforced polyester composites: characterization study, modeling and optimization
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Mechanical properties of potassium hydroxide-pretreated Christmas palm fiber-reinforced polyester composites: characterization study, modeling and optimization

  • S. Kalyana Sundaram EMAIL logo and S. Jayabal
Published/Copyright: July 7, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The mechanical properties of Christmas palm-reinforced polyester composite were improved by chemical modification of Christmas palm fibers through alkali treatment. An attempt was made in this investigation to identify the possibility of using potassium hydroxide as alkali solution. The fibers treated with potassium hydroxide aqueous solution at varying solution concentrations and soaking times were reinforced in a polyester matrix and tested for their mechanical properties. The physicochemical interaction between the treated Christmas palm fiber and polyester matrix was characterized using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The surface modification of fibers improved the compatibility of fibers with polyester matrix, which, in turn, resulted in better mechanical properties. A nonlinear regression model was developed to predict the mechanical properties of the composites using response surface methodology. The better treatment conditions for optimum mechanical properties were determined using a heuristic optimization method called particle swarm optimization (PSO). The optimized value obtained using the PSO technique was validated through a confirmation test, and the result was found to be significant.


Corresponding author: S. Kalyana Sundaram, Department of Mechanical Engineering, A.C. College of Engineering and Technology, Karaikudi 630 004, India, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Dr. G. Sozhan, Senior Principal Scientist, Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, India, and Dr. P. Vijayan, Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government College of Engineering, Salem in Salem, Tamil Nadu, India, for their valuable suggestion to do this work.

References

[1] Harish S, Michael DP, Bensely A, Mohan Lal D, Rajadurai A. Mater. Charact. 2009, 60, 44–49.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Satyanarayana KG, Pillai CKS, Sukumara K, Pillai SGK. J. Mater. Sci. 1982, 17, 2453–2462.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Venkata Reddy G, Venkata Naidu ST, Shobha Rani T. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2009, 28, 2035–2044.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Pothan LA, Thomas S, Neelakantan NR. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2009, 16, 744–764.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Panthapulakkal S, Sain MM. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 103, 2432–2441.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Murali Mohan Rao K, Mohana Rao K. Compos. Struct. 2007, 77, 288–295.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gassan J, Bledzki AK. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1999, 59(9), 1303–1309.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Cao Y, Shibata S, Fukumoto I. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006, 37(3), 423–429.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kumar R, Obrai S, Sharma A. Der Chem. Sin. 2011, 2(4), 219–228.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Jacob M, Thomas S, Varughese KT. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 955–965.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Jayabal S, Natarajan U. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 51, 371–381.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Jayabal S, Natarajan U, Sekar U. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2011, 55, 263–273.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Jayabal S, Natarajan U. Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater. 2011, 9, 149–172.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Mahjoub R, Yatim JM, Mohd Sam AR, Hashemi SH. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 55, 103–113.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ishikawa H, Takagi H, Nakagaito AN, Yasuzawa M, Genta H, Saito H. Compos. Interf. 2014, 21, 329–336.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Mishra S, Mohanty AK, Drzal LT, Misra M, Parija S, Nayak SK, Tripathy SS. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 1377–1385.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Monteiro SN, Terrones LAH, D’Almeida JRM. Polym. Test. 2008, 27, 591–595.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kaith BS, Singha AS, Gupta SK. J. Polym. Mater. 2003, 20, 195–199.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kaushik VK, Kumar A, Kalia S. Int. J. Text. Sci. 2012, 1(6), 101–105.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Cornell JA. How to Apply Response Surface Methodology, 2nd ed., American Society for Quality Control: Wisconsin, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Box G, Draper N. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, Wiley: New York, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Cojocaru C, Zakrzewska-Trznadel G. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 298, 56–70.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Proceedings of the International Conference, Neural Networks, Perth, Australia, 1995, pp. 1942–1948.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Kumar ND, Reddy JM. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2007, 133, 192–201.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Jarboui B, Ibrahim S, Siarry P, Rebai A. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2008, 54, 526–538.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Prasad SV, Pavithran C, Rohatgi PK. J. Mater. Sci. 1983, 18, 1443–1454.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Kalyanasundaram S, Jayabal S. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 467, 208–213.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Liu Y, Hu H. Fibers Polym. 2008, 9, 735–739.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Borysiak S, Doczekalska B. Fibers Text East. Eur. 2005, 13, 87–89.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Valadez-Gonzalez A, Cervantes-Uc JM, Olayo R, Herrera Franco PJ. Compos. Part B 1999, 30, 309–320.10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00054-7Search in Google Scholar

[31] Haque MM, Hasan M, Islam MS, Ali ME. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 4903–4906.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-3-31
Accepted: 2014-6-2
Published Online: 2014-7-7
Published in Print: 2014-12-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original articles
  3. Curing kinetics of styrene-(ethylene-butylene)-styrene (SEBS) copolymer by peroxides in the presence of co-agents
  4. Synthesis and properties of novel high thermally stable polyimide-chrysotile composites as fire retardant materials
  5. Flame-resistant polymeric composite fibers based on nanocoating flame retardant: thermogravimetric study and production of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles by flame combustion
  6. Mechanical and morphological properties of high density polyethylene and polylactide blends
  7. Synthesis and characterization of magnetic Ni0.3 Zn0.7 Fe2 O4/polyvinyl acetate (PVAC) nanocomposite
  8. Effect of titanium nanofiller on the productivity and crystallinity of ethylene and propylene copolymer
  9. Mechanical properties of potassium hydroxide-pretreated Christmas palm fiber-reinforced polyester composites: characterization study, modeling and optimization
  10. Natural frequency response of laminated hybrid composite beams with and without cutouts
  11. Characterization of C2H2O4 doped PVA solid polymer electrolyte
  12. Development and characterization of homo, co and terpolyimides based on BPDA, BTDA, 6FDA and ODA with low dielectric constant
  13. Highly-filled hybrid composites prepared using centrifugal deposition
  14. Reinforcement of carboxylated acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (XNBR) with graphene nanoplatelets with varying surface area
  15. Multiple melting behavior of poly(lactic acid)-hemp-silica composites using modulated-temperature differential scanning calorimetry
Downloaded on 3.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2014-0084/pdf?lang=en
Scroll to top button