Home Reinforcement of carboxylated acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (XNBR) with graphene nanoplatelets with varying surface area
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Reinforcement of carboxylated acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (XNBR) with graphene nanoplatelets with varying surface area

  • Anna Laskowska EMAIL logo , Anna Marzec , Marian Zaborski and Gisele Boiteux
Published/Copyright: March 6, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Graphene nanoplatelets (xGnP-C) with specific surface areas varying from 300 to 750 m2/g were investigated as novel reinforcing fillers for carboxylated acrylonitrile- butadiene rubber (XNBR). The effects of graphene nanoflakes loadings up to 15 parts per hundred rubber (phr) on the rheometric characteristics, stress-strain behavior, crosslink density (ν), resistance to UV radiation and thermo-oxidative aging of the XNBR/ZnO/graphene xGnP-C composites were investigated. Substantial improvement in the mechanical properties of XNBR with increased contents of xGnP-C filler was achieved. It was found that the addition of 5 phr of graphene significantly increased UV stability, tensile strength (TS) and modulus at 100%, 200% and 300% elongation of rubber material. The effect was more pronounced for composites containing graphene with the highest specific surface area 750 m2/g. The chemical information on the functional groups on the xGnP-C surface was obtained by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) method. In this case, the reinforcing effect of graphene xGnP-C may result from an additional chemical bonding which is possible between the -COOH groups of the rubber and the reactive, oxygen-containing groups on the filler surface.


Corresponding author: Anna Laskowska, Institute of Polymer and Dye Technology, Technical University of Lodz, Stefanowskiego 12/16, Lodz 90–924, Poland, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported from research project No NN209 200338.

References

[1] Vadukumpully S, Paul J, Valiyaveettil S. Carbon 2009, 47, 3288–3294.10.1016/j.carbon.2009.07.049Search in Google Scholar

[2] Novoselov KS, Jiang D, Schedin F, Booth TJ, Khotkevich VV, Morozov SV. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005, 102, 10451–10453.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bunch JS, Van Der Zande AM, Verbridge SS, Frank IW, Tanenbaum DM, Parpia JM, Craighead HG, McEuen PL. Science 2007, 315, 49–493.10.1126/science.1136836Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Oostinga JB, Heersche HB, Liu X, Morpurgo A, Vandersypen MK. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 151–157.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Duplock EJ, Scheffler M, Lindan PJD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 225502.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Zhang Y, Small JP, Amori MES, Kim P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 176803.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kovtyukhova NI, Ollivier PJ, Martin BR, Mallouk TE, Chizhik SA, Buzaneva EV, Gorchinskiy AD. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 771–778.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Sengupta R, Bhattacharya M, Bandyopadhyay S, Bhowmick AK. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 638–670.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Song P, Cao Z, Cai Y, Zhao L, Fang Z, Fu S. Polymer 2011, 52, 4001–4010.10.1016/j.polymer.2011.06.045Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kim HM, Lee JK, Lee HS. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 7766–7771.10.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.016Search in Google Scholar

[11] Teng CC, Ma CCM, Lu CH, Yang SY, Lee SH, Hsiao MC, Yen MY, Chiou KC, Lee TM. Carbon 2011, 49, 5107–5116.10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.095Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kim H, Kobayashi S, AbdurRahim MA, Zhang MJ, Khusainova A, Hillmyer MA, Abdala AA, Macosko CW. Polymer 2011, 52, 1837–1846.10.1016/j.polymer.2011.02.017Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kim H, Abdala AA, Macosko CW. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 6515–6530.10.1021/ma100572eSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Bai X, Wan C, Zhang Y, Zhai Y. Carbon 2011, 49, 1608–1613.10.1016/j.carbon.2010.12.043Search in Google Scholar

[15] Kujawski M, Pearse JD, Smela E. Carbon 2010, 48, 2409–2417.10.1016/j.carbon.2010.02.040Search in Google Scholar

[16] Khan U, May P, O’Neill A, Coleman JN. Carbon 2010, 48, 4035–4041.10.1016/j.carbon.2010.07.008Search in Google Scholar

[17] Nawaz K, Khan U, Ul-Haq N, May P, O’Neill, Coleman JN. Carbon 2012, 50, 4489–4494.10.1016/j.carbon.2012.05.029Search in Google Scholar

[18] Menes O, Cano M, Benedito A, Gimenez E, Castell, Maser WK, Benito AM. J. Comp. Sci. Tech. 2012, 72, 1595–1601.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Appel AK, Thomann R, Mulhaupt R. Polymer 2012, 53, 4931–4939.10.1016/j.polymer.2012.09.016Search in Google Scholar

[20] Cai D, Jin J, Yusoh K, Rafik R, Song M. J. Comp. Sci. Tech. 2012, 72, 702–707.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Yadav SK, Cho JW. J Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 266, 360–367.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Hu H, Zhao L, Liu J, Liu Y, Cheng J, Luo J, Liang Y, Tao Y, Wang X, Zhao J. Polymer 2012, 53, 3378–3385.10.1016/j.polymer.2012.05.039Search in Google Scholar

[23] Flory PJ, Rehner J. J. Chem. Phys. 1943, 11, 521–526.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Zaborski M, Kosmalska A, Gulinski J. Gummi Kunstst. 2005, 58, 354–357.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Bandyopadhyay S, De PP, Tripathy DK, De SK. Polymer 1996, 37, 353–357.10.1016/0032-3861(96)81110-4Search in Google Scholar

[26] Ismail H, Tan S, Poh BT. J. Elastomers Plast. 2001, 33, 251–262.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Arroyo M, Lopez-Manchado MA, Herrero B. Polymer 2003, 44, 2447–2453.10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00090-9Search in Google Scholar

[28] El-Sabbagh SH, Yehia AA. Egypt. J. Solids 2007, 30, 157–173.10.21608/ejs.2007.149034Search in Google Scholar

[29] Ghari HS, Shakouri Z. Rubber Chem. Technol. 2012, 85, 132–146.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Mehrabi M, Ghari HS. Am. J. Eng. Res. 2013, 2, 62–64.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Sombatsompop N. J. Sci. Soc. Thailand 1998, 24, 199–204.10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.1998.24.199Search in Google Scholar

[32] Mandal UK, Tripathy DK, De SK. Plast. Rubber Comp. Proc. Appl. 1995, 24, 19–25.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Kulia T, Bose S, Khanra, Kim NH, Rhee KY, Lee JH. Composites A 2011, 42, 1856–1861.10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.08.014Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-6-25
Accepted: 2014-1-26
Published Online: 2014-3-6
Published in Print: 2014-12-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original articles
  3. Curing kinetics of styrene-(ethylene-butylene)-styrene (SEBS) copolymer by peroxides in the presence of co-agents
  4. Synthesis and properties of novel high thermally stable polyimide-chrysotile composites as fire retardant materials
  5. Flame-resistant polymeric composite fibers based on nanocoating flame retardant: thermogravimetric study and production of α-Al2O3 nanoparticles by flame combustion
  6. Mechanical and morphological properties of high density polyethylene and polylactide blends
  7. Synthesis and characterization of magnetic Ni0.3 Zn0.7 Fe2 O4/polyvinyl acetate (PVAC) nanocomposite
  8. Effect of titanium nanofiller on the productivity and crystallinity of ethylene and propylene copolymer
  9. Mechanical properties of potassium hydroxide-pretreated Christmas palm fiber-reinforced polyester composites: characterization study, modeling and optimization
  10. Natural frequency response of laminated hybrid composite beams with and without cutouts
  11. Characterization of C2H2O4 doped PVA solid polymer electrolyte
  12. Development and characterization of homo, co and terpolyimides based on BPDA, BTDA, 6FDA and ODA with low dielectric constant
  13. Highly-filled hybrid composites prepared using centrifugal deposition
  14. Reinforcement of carboxylated acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (XNBR) with graphene nanoplatelets with varying surface area
  15. Multiple melting behavior of poly(lactic acid)-hemp-silica composites using modulated-temperature differential scanning calorimetry
Downloaded on 3.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2013-0149/pdf?lang=en
Scroll to top button