Home Effect of shear factor on bubble nucleation of polystyrene using supercritical fluid as a foaming agent
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of shear factor on bubble nucleation of polystyrene using supercritical fluid as a foaming agent

  • Wenjie Mou EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 4, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The effect of shear factor on bubble nucleation during the foaming extrusion process with polystyrene (PS) using the supercritical fluid (SCF) carbon dioxide (CO2) as a foaming agent was studied based on the energy transformation in this article. The influence of shear factor (which is caused by the velocity gradient in a conical die) on the dynamics of bubble nucleation was investigated and determined. The critical radius for bubble nucleation is presented through the Taylor deformation theory by using a nuclear embryo to represent the state in the bud of the appearance of the nuclear bubble. Theoretical analysis shows that a spherical nuclear bubble can split into two new nuclear bubbles after the deformation in the shear flow field; the radius of the new nuclear bubble is greater than the critical radius, so it can finally grow into a larger nuclear bubble. The shear factor increased the number of the nuclear bubbles in the polymer melt and so increased the density of the bubbles and decreased the diameters of the bubbles. This article proposes a qualitative judgment which indicates that the shear factor in a conical die has a beneficial effect on bubble nucleation, and helps to produce foamed plastics with fine bubbles.


Corresponding author: Wenjie Mou, School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510641, P.R. China, e-mail:

References

[1] Lee MH, Tzoganakis C, Park CB. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1998, 38, 1112–1120.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Omar F, Andrzej KB, Laurent MM. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2007, 292, 113–127.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ki YM, Kang SL, Kwak HY. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2004, 44, 1890–1899.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Park CB, Padareva V, Lee PC, Naguib HE. J. Polym. Eng. 2005, 25, 239–260.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Wong A, Park CB. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 75, 49–62.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Leung SN, Park CB, Li HB. J. Cell. Plast. 2010, 46, 441–460.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Martini JE. The Production and Analysis of Microcellular Foam, Master of Science’s Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Boston, 1981.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Colton JS, Suh NP. Polym. Eng. Sci. 987, 27, 485.10.1002/pen.760270702Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wu Shunying, Xu Jingyi. The Process of Foam Plastics. Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Rodeheaver BA, Colton JS. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2001, 41, 380–400.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chopra D, Haynes C, Hatzikiriakos SG, Vlassopoulos D. J. Non-Newton. Fluid 1999, 82, 367–385.10.1016/S0377-0257(98)00172-4Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kweeder JA. Nucleation Mechanisms in Microcellular Polymer Foams, PhD Thesis, Clarkson University: Potsdam, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Mou Wenjie. Study on Dynamic Nucleation Mechanism in Microcellular Plastics Using Supercritical CO2Fluid, PhD Thesis, South China University of Technology: Guangzhou, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Zhang Kai. Interface Science of Macromolecule. China Petrochemical Press: Beijing, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Triplett KA, Ghiaasiaan SM, Abdel-Khalik SI, Sadowski DL. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 1999, 25, 377–394.10.1016/S0301-9322(98)00054-8Search in Google Scholar

[16] Han CD. Multi-Phase Flow in Polymer Processing. Academic Press: New York, 1981.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-5-26
Accepted: 2014-1-26
Published Online: 2014-3-4
Published in Print: 2014-7-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2013-0126/html
Scroll to top button