Startseite Literaturwissenschaften Equity as a Question of Decorum and Manners: Conscience as Vision
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Equity as a Question of Decorum and Manners: Conscience as Vision

  • Piyel Haldar

    Piyel Haldar teaches law at Birkbeck College, University of London. He specialises in early modern legal history. His current research investigates the emblematic forms of legal argument during the European renaissance and the evolution of law as a global network of discourse during the same period. His most recent publication is “The Tongue and the Eye; Eloquence and Office in Renaissance Humanism” in Genealogies of Legal Vision, eds. Peter Goodrich and Valerie Hayaert (Routledge 2015).

    EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. September 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Pólemos
Aus der Zeitschrift Pólemos Band 10 Heft 2

Abstract

This paper argues for a re-evaluation of the manner in which conscience is used by equity lawyers. Debates by early modern humanists sought an alignment between conscience and public office. Indeed, conscience had very little to do with the private morals or private compunction of the Chancellor. Rather, conscience was implicated at the level of duty, honestas and dignity. It required stricter attention to the metaphysics of public official conduct. In these terms, conscience was a humanist re-evaluation of a classical idea that gave heavier emphasis to the poesis of vision.

About the author

Piyel Haldar

Piyel Haldar teaches law at Birkbeck College, University of London. He specialises in early modern legal history. His current research investigates the emblematic forms of legal argument during the European renaissance and the evolution of law as a global network of discourse during the same period. His most recent publication is “The Tongue and the Eye; Eloquence and Office in Renaissance Humanism” in Genealogies of Legal Vision, eds. Peter Goodrich and Valerie Hayaert (Routledge 2015).

Published Online: 2016-9-7
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 22.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pol-2016-0018/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen