Abstract
Comic immoralism is the view that sometimes funny things are funny due to their having immoral properties of some sort. Immoralism has many proponents and detractors. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, I clarify the scope and content of comic immoralism as a general thesis in the philosophy of humor. I will argue that the debate about immoralism has unduly excluded certain categories of humor from inclusion, and that the language which immoralists sometimes use can be misleading. Second, I argue for my own version of immoralism, which I call ridicule immoralism. Ridicule immoralism holds that sometimes things are funny due to their being ridiculous, and that things are often ridiculous due to being morally flawed. It follows from this that a version of comic immoralism is true.
About the author
University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA;
References
An, Dong, and Kaiyuan Chen. 2021. “Jokes Can Fail to Be Funny Because They Are Immoral: The Incompatibility of Emotions.” Philosophical Psychology 34(3): 374 – 96.10.1080/09515089.2021.1874331Suche in Google Scholar
Aristotle. Poetics. 2006. Translated by Joe Sachs. Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing./R. Pullins Co.Suche in Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël. 1996. “Moderate Moralism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 36(3): 223 – 38.10.1093/bjaesthetics/36.3.223Suche in Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël. 2014. “Ethics and Comic Amusement.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 54(2): 241 – 53.10.1093/aesthj/ayu015Suche in Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël. 2000. “Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research.” Ethics 110(2): 350 – 87.10.1086/233273Suche in Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 2001. Cicero: The Ideal Orator. Translated by Shackleton Bailey D R. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780195091984.book.1Suche in Google Scholar
Declerq, Dieter. 2018. “A Definition of Satire (and Why a Definition Matters).” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76(3): 319 – 30.10.1111/jaac.12563Suche in Google Scholar
Eaton, Anne. W. 2003. “Where Ethics and Aesthetics Meet: Titian’s Rape of Europa.” Hypatia 18(4): 159 – 8810.1111/j.1527-2001.2003.tb01417.xSuche in Google Scholar
Eaton, Anne W. 2012. “Robust Immoralism.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70(3): 281 – 92.10.1111/j.1540-6245.2012.01520.xSuche in Google Scholar
“Exclusive: Palin on Foreign Policy.” CBS News. CBS Interactive, September 27, 2008. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/exclusive-palin-on-foreign-policy/.Suche in Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1981. Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious. Translated by James Strachey. London: The Hogarth Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Gaut, Berys. 1998a. “The Ethical Criticism of Art.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited by Jerrold Levinson, 182 – 203. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511663888.007Suche in Google Scholar
Gaut, Berys. 1998b. “Just Joking: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Humor.” Philosophy and Literature 22(1): 51 – 68.10.1353/phl.1998.0014Suche in Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan. Edited by Edwin Curley. Indianapolis, IN. Hackett Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1987.”Of the Standards of Taste.”In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, edited by Eugene F. Miller, 226 – 49. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Suche in Google Scholar
Jacobson, Daniel. 1997. “In Praise of Immoral Art.” Philosophical Topics 25(1): 155 – 99.10.5840/philtopics199725123Suche in Google Scholar
Jacobson, Daniel. 2005. “Ethical Criticism and the Vice of Moderation.” In Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, edited by Mathew Kieran, 342 – 57. New York: Wiley Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Kivy, Peter. 2003. “Jokes Are a Laughing Matter.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61(1): 5 – 15.10.1111/1540-6245.00087Suche in Google Scholar
Knott, Blanche. 1982. Truly Tasteless Jokes. Ballantine, NY: Ballantine Books.Suche in Google Scholar
McKee, Rick/CagleCartoons.com. “Democrats Can't Stop Vaping Socialism.” Bristol Herald Courier – Tricities, September 15, 2019.https://heraldcourier.com/opinion/democratscant-stopvaping-socialism/image_ee6451de-d76e-11e9-882b-0f27941be29b.html.Suche in Google Scholar
Morreall, John. 1987. The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Nannicelli, Ted. 2014. “Moderate Comic Immoralism and the Genetic Approach to the Ethical Criticism of Art.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72(2): 169 – 79.10.1111/jaac.12072Suche in Google Scholar
Nath, Rekha. 2019. “The Injustice of Fat Stigma.” Bioethics 33(5): 577 – 90.10.1111/bioe.12560Suche in Google Scholar
NPR. “Fat Phobia and Its Racist Past and Present.” NPR. NPR, July 21, 2020. https://www.npr.org/transcripts/893006538Suche in Google Scholar
Plato. 2016. The Republic of Plato. Edited by Adam Kirsch. Translated by Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Plato. 2019. Philebus. Edited and translated by James L. Wood. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.Suche in Google Scholar
“Sarah Palin's Hand Crib Notes Mocked by White House Aide.” The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, February 10, 2010. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/feb/10/sarah-palinhand-crib-notes-white-house.Suche in Google Scholar
Shaw, Joshua. 2010. “Philosophy of Humor.” Philosophy Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00281.x10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00281.xSuche in Google Scholar
Smuts, Aaron. 2009. “Do Moral Flaws Enhance Amusement?” American Philosophical Quarterly 46(2): 151 – 62.Suche in Google Scholar
Smuts, Aaron. 2010. “The Ethics of Humor: Can your sense of Humor be Wrong?” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13(3): 333 – 47.10.1007/s10677-009-9203-5Suche in Google Scholar
Smuts, Aaron. 2013. “The Salacious and the Satirical: In Defense of Symmetric Comic Moralism.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 47(4): 45 – 63.10.5406/jaesteduc.47.4.0045Suche in Google Scholar
Sole-Smith, Virginia. “In Obesity Research, Fatphobia Is Always the X Factor.” Scientific American. Scientific American, March 6, 2021. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/in-obesity-research-fatphobia-is-always-thex-factor/.Scientific American, 6 Mar. 2021.10.1038/scientificamerican062021-5rz5CxRZUnfAAect1UAqKASuche in Google Scholar
Tapley, Robin. 2012. “Humour, Beliefs, and Prejudice.” Southwest Philosophy Review 28(1): 85 – 92.10.5840/swphilreview20122819Suche in Google Scholar
Treisman, Rachel. “Big Bird Got 'Vaccinated' against COVID-19, Drawing Outrage from Republicans.” NPR Illinois, November 8, 2021. https://www.nprillinois.org/2021-1108/big-bird-got-vaccinated-against-covid-19-drawing-outrage-from-republicans.Suche in Google Scholar
“USA Today Cartoonist Mike Thompson's 2021 in Review.” USA Today. Gannett Satellite Information Network, December 27, 2021. https://www.usatoday.com/picturegallery/opinion/2021/12/27/2021-funny-cartoon-review-today-cartoonist-mike-thompsons-2021-review/9024561002/.Suche in Google Scholar
Woodcock, Scott. 2015. “Comic Immoralism and Relatively Funny Jokes.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 32(2): 203 – 16.10.1111/japp.12084Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titlepages
- Titlepages
- Table of Contents
- Articles
- Vico’s Theory of Humor and Laughter
- Laughter as Natural Piety: John Dewey, Humor, and the Religious
- Understanding Humor: Four Conceptual Approaches to the Elusive Subject
- Reality Is a Joke
- What Makes a Joke Bad: Enthymemes and the Pragmatics of Humor
- It’s Okay to Laugh at Fat Bastard: Ridicule, Satire, and Immoralism
- Oppression, Subversive Humor, and Unstable Politics
- What's the Deal with Sophists? Critical Thought and Humor in Ancient Philosophy and Contemporary Comedy
- Discussion: Article for Further Debate
- Discussion: Article for Further Debate Edited by John Marmysz
- What’s So Funny About Golf?
- Artificial Intelligence, Phenomenology, and The Molyneux Problem
- A Kernel of Truth: Outlining an Epistemology of Jokes
- Philosophical Satire and Criticism
- Philosophical Satire and Criticism Edited by Steven Gimbel
- How to Read Wittgenstein as x: An Exercise in Selective Interpretation
- Humor in Philosophy Education
- Humor in Philosophy Education Edited by Christine A. James
- Quantifying Laughter in International Research
- Symposium
- Symposium Edited by Steven Gimbel Robert R. Clewis, Foreword by Noël Carroll, Kant’s Humorous Writings: An Illustrated Guide. Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. Pp. xxiv + 256 Critics
- Prosecuting the Case against Clewis
- All in Good Taste
- Is Kant Seriously Funny?
- Clewis on Kant’s Humor
- Author’s Response
- Author's Response
- Humor and the Arts: Taking Kant Seriously
- Book Reviews
- Book Reviews Edited by Lydia Amir With Pierre Destrée (Ancient and Medieval Philosophy) and John Marmysz (Modern and Contemporary Philosophy)
- Call for Papers, Book Reviews, Guidelines
- Call for Papers, Book Reviews, Guidelines
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titlepages
- Titlepages
- Table of Contents
- Articles
- Vico’s Theory of Humor and Laughter
- Laughter as Natural Piety: John Dewey, Humor, and the Religious
- Understanding Humor: Four Conceptual Approaches to the Elusive Subject
- Reality Is a Joke
- What Makes a Joke Bad: Enthymemes and the Pragmatics of Humor
- It’s Okay to Laugh at Fat Bastard: Ridicule, Satire, and Immoralism
- Oppression, Subversive Humor, and Unstable Politics
- What's the Deal with Sophists? Critical Thought and Humor in Ancient Philosophy and Contemporary Comedy
- Discussion: Article for Further Debate
- Discussion: Article for Further Debate Edited by John Marmysz
- What’s So Funny About Golf?
- Artificial Intelligence, Phenomenology, and The Molyneux Problem
- A Kernel of Truth: Outlining an Epistemology of Jokes
- Philosophical Satire and Criticism
- Philosophical Satire and Criticism Edited by Steven Gimbel
- How to Read Wittgenstein as x: An Exercise in Selective Interpretation
- Humor in Philosophy Education
- Humor in Philosophy Education Edited by Christine A. James
- Quantifying Laughter in International Research
- Symposium
- Symposium Edited by Steven Gimbel Robert R. Clewis, Foreword by Noël Carroll, Kant’s Humorous Writings: An Illustrated Guide. Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. Pp. xxiv + 256 Critics
- Prosecuting the Case against Clewis
- All in Good Taste
- Is Kant Seriously Funny?
- Clewis on Kant’s Humor
- Author’s Response
- Author's Response
- Humor and the Arts: Taking Kant Seriously
- Book Reviews
- Book Reviews Edited by Lydia Amir With Pierre Destrée (Ancient and Medieval Philosophy) and John Marmysz (Modern and Contemporary Philosophy)
- Call for Papers, Book Reviews, Guidelines
- Call for Papers, Book Reviews, Guidelines