Abstract
In this paper, we focus on mediation in intrastate conflicts, specifically on the impact of rebel group goals on the prospects for mediation. We ask whether the goals for which rebel groups fight (i.e. secession, irredentism, autonomy, greater political rights, government overthrow) have an impact on the likelihood that these conflicts will be mediated. We test our hypotheses on a new data set of rebel groups in Africa 1962–2010.
References
Badran, R. (2014). Intrastate peace agreements and the durability of peace. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 31(2), 193–217.10.1177/0738894213501133Search in Google Scholar
Bakaki, Z., Bohmelt, T., & Bove, V. (2016). Barriers to coordination? Examining the impact of culture on international mediation occurrence and effectiveness. Political Studies, 64(3), 492–512.10.1111/1467-9248.12199Search in Google Scholar
Bercovitch, J. (1992). The structural diversity of mediation in international relations. In J. Bercovitch & J. Rubin (Eds.), Mediation in international relations (pp. 1–29), London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Bercovitch, J. (1995). Mediation at the interstate level: Engagement or neutrality as the key to success. In N. Ropers (Ed.), Peaceful conflict management on the interstate level (pp. 89–112).Search in Google Scholar
Bercovitch, J., & Lutmar, C. (2010). Beyond negotiation deadlocks: The importance of mediation and leadership change. In A. Narlikar (Ed.), Deadlocks in multilateral negotiations (pp. 232–253). Cambridge, UK: Camridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804809.011Search in Google Scholar
Bohmelt, T. (2016). The importance of conflict characteristics for the diffusion of international mediation. Journal of Peace Research, 53(3), 378–391.10.1177/0022343316628827Search in Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Boston, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4292.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 563–595.10.1093/oep/gpf064Search in Google Scholar
DeRouen, K. Jr., Lea J., & Wallensteen P. (2009). The duration of civil war peace agreements. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 26, 4367–4387.10.1177/0738894209106481Search in Google Scholar
Doyle, M., & Sambanis, N. (2000). International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis. American Political Science Review, 94(4), 779–801.10.2307/2586208Search in Google Scholar
Elbadawi, I., & Sambanis, N. (2002). How much war will we see? Explaining the prevalence of civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(3), 307–334.10.1177/0022002702046003001Search in Google Scholar
Fearon, J. (2004). Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others. Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 275–301.10.1177/0022343304043770Search in Google Scholar
Fearon, J. (2006). Testimony to US house of representatives, committee on government reform, subcommittee on national security, emerging threats, and international relations on “Iraq: Democracy or civil war?”Search in Google Scholar
Fearon, J., & Laitin, D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75–90.10.1017/S0003055403000534Search in Google Scholar
Fortna, V. (2004). Peace time: Ceasefire arrangements and the durability of peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691187952Search in Google Scholar
Gartner, S. S. (2011). Signs of trouble: Regional organizational mediation and civil war agreement durability. Journal of Politics, 73(2), 380–390.10.1017/S0022381611000090Search in Google Scholar
Gokcek, G. (2010). Irredentism Versus Secessionism: The Potential for International Conflict. Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting.10.2139/ssrn.1595095Search in Google Scholar
Greig, M. J. (2005). Stepping into the fray: When do mediators mediate? American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 249–266.10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00121.xSearch in Google Scholar
Greig, M. J., & Regan, P. (2008). When do they say yes? An analysis of the willingness to offer and accept mediation in civil wars. International Studies Quarterly, 52(4), 759–781.10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00525.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hampson, F. O. (1996). Nurturing peace: Why peace settlements succeed or fail. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hartzell, C., Hoddie, M., & Rothchild, D. (2001). Stabilizing the peace after civil war: An investigation of some key variables. International Organizations, 55(1), 183–208.10.1162/002081801551450Search in Google Scholar
Hegre, H., Ellingsen, T., Gates, S., & Gleditsch, N. P. (2001). Toward a democratic civil peace?: Democracy, political change and civil war, 1816–1992. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 17–33.10.1017/S0003055401000119Search in Google Scholar
Licklider, R. (Ed.). (1993). Stopping the killing: How civil wars end. New York: NYU Press.Search in Google Scholar
Licklider, R. (1995). The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 681–190.10.2307/2082982Search in Google Scholar
Licklider, R. (2001). Obstacles to peace settlements. In C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson & P. Aall (Eds.), Turbulent peace: The challenges of managing international conflict (pp. 697–718). Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lounsbery, M. O., & Cook, A. H. (2011). Rebellion, Mediation, and Group Change: An Empirical Investigation of Competing Hypotheses. Journal of Peace Research, 48(1),73–84.10.1177/0022343310390256Search in Google Scholar
Lutmar, C., & Terris, L. (2016). Leadership changes and civil wars agreements: Exploring preliminary links. Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, 22(4), 439–449.10.1515/peps-2016-0033Search in Google Scholar
Lutmar, C. & Terris, L. (in press). Introducing a new dataset on leadership change in rebel groups, 1946–2010. Journal of Peace Research.10.1177/0022343318802979Search in Google Scholar
Maoz, Z., & Terris, L. (2006). Credibility and strategy in international mediation. International Interactions, 32, 409–440.10.4324/9780203885130.pt2Search in Google Scholar
Mason, T. D., & Fett, P. (1996). How civil wars end: A rational choice approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40(4), 546–568.10.1177/0022002796040004002Search in Google Scholar
Mason, T. D., Weingarten, P. J., & Fett, P. J. (1999). Win, lose, or draw: predicting the outcome of civil wars. Political Research Quarterly, 52(2), 239–268.10.1177/106591299905200201Search in Google Scholar
Olson, M., & Pearson, F. (2002). Civil war characteristics, mediators and resolution. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 19(4), 421–445.10.1002/crq.3890190404Search in Google Scholar
Pearson, F., Lounsbery, M. O., Walker, S., & Mann, S. (2006). Rethinking models of civil war settlement. International Interactions, 32(2), 109–128.10.1080/15325020600698728Search in Google Scholar
Regan, P. (2000). Civil wars and foreign powers: Intervention and intrastate conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.16706Search in Google Scholar
Regan, P. (2002). Third-party interventions and the duration of intrastate conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(1), 55–73.10.1177/0022002702046001004Search in Google Scholar
Stedman, S. J. (1991). Peacemaking in civil wars: International mediation in Zimbabwe. Boulder CO: Lynne Reinner Publishers, Inc.Search in Google Scholar
Terris, L. (2017). Mediation of international conflicts: A rational model. London, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Terris, L., & Maoz, Z. (2005). Rational mediation: A theory and a test. Journal of Peace Research, 42(5), 463–483.10.1177/0022343305056231Search in Google Scholar
Walter, B. F. (1997). The critical barrier to civil war settlement. International Organization, 51(3), 335–364.10.1162/002081897550384Search in Google Scholar
Walter, B. F. (2002). Committing to peace: The successful settlement of civil wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400824465Search in Google Scholar
Walter, B. F. (2003). Explaining the intractability of territorial conflict. International Studies Review, 5(4), 137–153.10.1111/j.1079-1760.2003.00504012.xSearch in Google Scholar
Zartman, W. I. (2001). The timing of peace initiatives: Hurting stalemates and ripe moments. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 1(1), 8–18.10.1080/14718800108405087Search in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Editorial
- Introduction to the Proceedings of the 18th Jan Tinbergen European Peace Science Conference
- Survey or Review
- Systematic Study of Gender, Conflict, and Peace
- Letters and Proceedings
- Political Initiatives and Peacekeeping: Assessing Multiple UN Conflict Resolution Tools
- US Military Response to the Risk of Terrorist Attacks
- Do Foreign Aid Projects Attract Transnational Terrorism?
- Military Spending and Inequality in Autocracies
- Beyond a Bag of Words: Using PULSAR to Extract Judgments on Specific Human Rights at Scale
- Predicting Terrorism with Machine Learning: Lessons from “Predicting Terrorism: A Machine Learning Approach”
- Conflict in Cyber-Space: The Network of Cyber Incidents, 2000–2014
- What do they Want? Rebels’ Objectives and Civil War Mediation
Articles in the same Issue
- Editorial
- Introduction to the Proceedings of the 18th Jan Tinbergen European Peace Science Conference
- Survey or Review
- Systematic Study of Gender, Conflict, and Peace
- Letters and Proceedings
- Political Initiatives and Peacekeeping: Assessing Multiple UN Conflict Resolution Tools
- US Military Response to the Risk of Terrorist Attacks
- Do Foreign Aid Projects Attract Transnational Terrorism?
- Military Spending and Inequality in Autocracies
- Beyond a Bag of Words: Using PULSAR to Extract Judgments on Specific Human Rights at Scale
- Predicting Terrorism with Machine Learning: Lessons from “Predicting Terrorism: A Machine Learning Approach”
- Conflict in Cyber-Space: The Network of Cyber Incidents, 2000–2014
- What do they Want? Rebels’ Objectives and Civil War Mediation