Abstract
The United Nations Peacemaking Initiatives (UNPI) data compile information on the full range of instruments the UN employs to advance peace and stability. After briefly introducing the data, we will describe how they help us to identify different types of UN peacemaking instruments based on what they aim to achieve (tasks), when they are applied (trends) and to what conflicts (selection).
Acknowledgements
Previously presented at the 2018 Jan Tinbergen Conference of the Network of European Peace Scientists, University of Verona, June 2018. Research sponsored by the Folke Bernadotte Academy (dnr. 16-00444).
References
Autesserre, S. (2010). The trouble with the congo; local violence and the failure of international peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511761034Search in Google Scholar
Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland. Conflict resolution and everyday politics of international interventions. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107280366Search in Google Scholar
Beardsley, K. (2008). Agreement without peace? International mediation and time inconsistency problems. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 723–740.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00339.xSearch in Google Scholar
Beardsley, K., Cunningham, D. E., & White, P. E. (2015). Diplomacy, peacekeeping and the severity of civil war. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association in San Francisco, September 3–6, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Benson, M., & Tucker, C. (2017). Naming names in UNSC conflict resolutions: implications for peacekeeping. Paper presented at the Folke Bernadotte Academy workshop in Addis Ababa, October 8, 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Clayton (ed), G., Kathman, J., Beardsley, K., Gizelis, T.-I., Olsson, L., Bove, V., Ruggeri, A., Zwetsloot, R., van der Lijn, J., Smit, T., Hultman, L., Dorussen, H., Ruggeri, A., Diehl, P. F., Bosco, L., & Goodness, C. (2016). The known knowns and known unknowns of peacekeeping data. International Peacekeeping, 24(1), 1–64. DOI: 10.1080/13533312.2016.1226768.Search in Google Scholar
Clayton, G., & Dorussen, H. (2018). The effectiveness of mediation and peacekeeping for global conflict management. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, April 4–7, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Doyle, M. W., & Sambanis, N. (2006). Making war and building peace. United Nations peace operations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400837694Search in Google Scholar
Fortna, V. P. (2008). Does peacekeeping work? Shaping belligerents’ choices after civil war. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400837731Search in Google Scholar
Greig, M. J., & Diehl, P. (2005). The peacekeeping–peacemaking dilemma. International Studies Quarterly, 49(4), 621–645.10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00381.xSearch in Google Scholar
Heldt, B. (2013). The lack of coordination in diplomatic peacekeeping. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs, 2(1), 9–16.Search in Google Scholar
Howard, L. M. (2008). UN peacekeeping in civil wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hultman, L., Kathman, J., & Shannon, M. (2013). United Nations peacekeeping and civilian protection in civil war. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 875–891.10.1111/ajps.12036Search in Google Scholar
Hultman, L., Kathman, J., & Shannon, M. (2014). Beyond keeping peace: United Nations effectiveness in the midst of fighting. American Political Science Review, 108(4), 737–753.10.1017/S0003055414000446Search in Google Scholar
Kreutz, J. (2010). How and when armed conflicts end: introducing the UCDP conflict termination dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 47(2), 243–250.10.1177/0022343309353108Search in Google Scholar
Paris, R. (2004). At war’s end: building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790836Search in Google Scholar
Ruggeri, A., Dorussen, H., & Gizelis, I. (2017). Winning the peace locally: UN peacekeeping and local conflict. International Organization, 71(1), 163–185.10.1017/S0020818316000333Search in Google Scholar
United Nations (2013). United Nations Political Missions: Report of the Secretary General.Search in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Editorial
- Introduction to the Proceedings of the 18th Jan Tinbergen European Peace Science Conference
- Survey or Review
- Systematic Study of Gender, Conflict, and Peace
- Letters and Proceedings
- Political Initiatives and Peacekeeping: Assessing Multiple UN Conflict Resolution Tools
- US Military Response to the Risk of Terrorist Attacks
- Do Foreign Aid Projects Attract Transnational Terrorism?
- Military Spending and Inequality in Autocracies
- Beyond a Bag of Words: Using PULSAR to Extract Judgments on Specific Human Rights at Scale
- Predicting Terrorism with Machine Learning: Lessons from “Predicting Terrorism: A Machine Learning Approach”
- Conflict in Cyber-Space: The Network of Cyber Incidents, 2000–2014
- What do they Want? Rebels’ Objectives and Civil War Mediation
Articles in the same Issue
- Editorial
- Introduction to the Proceedings of the 18th Jan Tinbergen European Peace Science Conference
- Survey or Review
- Systematic Study of Gender, Conflict, and Peace
- Letters and Proceedings
- Political Initiatives and Peacekeeping: Assessing Multiple UN Conflict Resolution Tools
- US Military Response to the Risk of Terrorist Attacks
- Do Foreign Aid Projects Attract Transnational Terrorism?
- Military Spending and Inequality in Autocracies
- Beyond a Bag of Words: Using PULSAR to Extract Judgments on Specific Human Rights at Scale
- Predicting Terrorism with Machine Learning: Lessons from “Predicting Terrorism: A Machine Learning Approach”
- Conflict in Cyber-Space: The Network of Cyber Incidents, 2000–2014
- What do they Want? Rebels’ Objectives and Civil War Mediation