Abstract
Direct deoxygenative borylation is a highly enabling chemical transformation considering the attractive synthetic features of oxygenous feedstocks and organoboron compounds. Despite ranking among the synthetic ideality in different settings, such chemical space remained largely uncharted and underutilized until recent decades. This short review will summarize some key advances in the field of direct deoxy-borylation of alcohols, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, and carboxylic acids and organize these contributions based on substrate classes. In each representative, the general features, including reaction conditions, product scopes and mechanistic insights, will be highlighted and discussed.
Introduction
Boron represents an ideal substituent, which played a central role in the functional group chemistries of modern synthesis [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. As a highly diversifiable building block in both polar and radical regimes [7], organoboron often serves as the starting point for synthetic planning, and its modularity constitutes numerous downstream transformations like cross-couplings, metallate rearrangements and deborylative additions [5, 8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. Moreover, the unique reactivity and structural traits of boron compounds lead to their widespread application in material science and medicinal chemistry. Particularly in the latter, the boronic group could mimic the amide moiety during enzymatic hydrolysis and behave as the potent bioisostere of the carboxylic group during drug discovery [18, 19] (Scheme 1).

Preparation of organoborons (Representative starting materials in the dark grey circle).
Despite its versatility and impact in various contexts, accessing organoboron heavily relies on manual synthesis owing to its scarcity in nature. Classic borylation reactions include hydroboration of unsaturated C–C bonds and transmetallation with organometallic reagents and boron electrophiles. The advent of transition metal-catalyzed Miyaura borylation marks a milestone, which reshapes the landscape of boron chemistry and considerably advances the modern borylation toolkit [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. Encouragingly, recent advances in radical- [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36] and carbene-mediated borylation [37], [38], [39], [40], [41] further enrich the synthetic route and scope of accessible organoboron. However, these precedent strategies mostly necessitate non-renewable or pre-functionalized substrates based on petroleum sources, which suffer limited availability, perceived instability and occasionally toxicity.
Oxygenous compounds are privileged chemical entities by virtue of their natural abundance, structural diversity and chemical stability [42]. These attractive features make the oxygenated feedstocks suitable surrogates for the non-renewable carbon electrophiles and forge C–B bonds directly from native functionalities. Nonetheless, such an ideal is often compromised by the thermodynamic stability of strong C–O bonds (bond dissociation energy, BDE = 90 kcal/mol for C–O in methanol and 175 kcal/mol for C=O in formaldehyde) [43]. In some cases, the kinetic inaccessibility of the C–O bond and the acidic O–H could also undermine deoxygenation. Although multistep C–O activation/borylation could be conceivable to impart the same deoxy-borylation reactivity, direct deoxygenative borylation remains a long-sought-after goal, which reflects a general trend toward future sustainability in the synthetic community [44], [45], [46].
Clearly, stepping toward direct deoxygenative borylation mandates novel chemical means that could manipulate the inert C–O bonds with minimal step counts and waste production. Although challenging, such linchpin techniques might unlock the approach to previously elusive boron compounds and provide a great opportunity for editing complex molecules via orthogonal late-stage functionalization. Recent years have witnessed a growing number of direct deoxy-borylation manifolds in literature. This minireview aims to summarize these contributions per the C–O substrates and highlight some general borylation strategies that allow the valorization of oxygenated carbon electrophiles. Accordingly, direct C–O borylation of alcohols, ethers, and carbonyl compounds, including aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids and esters, will be presented.
Hopefully, this review could offer a timely update on the state-of-the-art boron compound synthesis via deoxygenation and some food for thought on the future direction of boron chemistry. To keep the text concise, only one-step deoxygenative borylation with complete removal of C–O bonds at the functionalized carbon will be included. Cascade reactions will not be covered unless closely related. Other oxides (e.g., nitro compounds and sulfoxides) are beyond the contents since the products obtained from the protodeoboronation of these boron intermediates would be more relevant to the synthetic practice.
Alcohol deoxygenative borylation
Alcohol is a straightforward surrogate of organohalide for boron compound synthesis. Advantageously, alcohol deoxygenative borylation could avoid the production of halide waste and only water or boron oxides will be generated as innocuous byproducts. In reality, such a direct O-to-B conversion via formal nucleophilic substitution was undermined by the reluctant –OH leaving group. Deoxygenation is even harsher after deprotonation under basic conditions. Clearly, new borylation catalysts or mechanisms are demanded to bridge the synthetic gap between alcohols and organoborons.
Metal-catalyzed deoxy-borylation of allylic, benzylic and propargylic alcohols
Considering the difficulty of alcohol direct borylation, the initial exploration in this field focused on some reactive alcohols like allylic alcohols. Pioneered by Szabó and his group, the direct deoxygenative borylation of free allylic alcohol was realized under mild palladium catalysis, among which ligand-free and ligand-enabled conditions were both feasible (Fig. 1A) [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54]. For the latter, the PSP- and PSeP-type pincer-type ligands were crucial, managing the desired transformation under mild conditions and controlling linear product formation. In Szabó’s proposed mechanism, the Lewis acidic B2X4 was dual-functional, serving as boron sources and activating the –OH in the allylic substrates. Counter anion BF4− of the palladium catalyst was also non-innocent, which would degrade into F− and BF3, assisting the transmetallation and activation of alcohols, respectively. The allylboron product could be directly subjected to carbonyl allylation in a one-pot manner.

Metal-catalyzed deoxygenative borylation of alcohols. DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide. B2pin2, bis(pinacolato)diboron; Bn, benzyl; THF, tetrahydrofuran; DMA, N,N-dimethylacetamide; Acac, acetylacetonate; OAc, acetate; DCPF, 1,1′-bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)ferrocene; MTBE, methyl tert-butyl ether; Xantphos, 4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthene.
In collaboration with Aggarwal’s group, they also unveiled a simple Pd-catalyzed protocol with a commercially available palladacyclic catalyst, giving a similar scope of allylboronates with high efficiency [49].
Encouraged by these prior efforts, the more economical iron catalysis was proved viable in the allylic alcohol borylation, as reported by Qu’s and Liu’s groups, respectively (Fig. 1B) [55, 56]. In both cases, primary allylboronates were the major products, while Liu’s conditions were aligned with higher stereocontrol over the alkene geometry due to the Fe-embedded chair transition state. Interestingly, Qu’s protocol required external Brønsted acid, H3BO3, for hydroxy group activation; however, a catalytic quantity of Lewis acidic iron was sufficient in the other case.
Recently, a heterogeneous deoxygenative borylation reaction of allylic and benzylic alcohol was accomplished by Shishido, Miura and their colleague by means of TiO2-supported gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) (Fig. 1C) [57]. Since this AuNP catalyst was designated primarily for acetate borylation, only examples of cinnamyl alcohol and p-anisyl alcohol were shown, which might be converted in situ to the OBpin intermediates via hydrogen evolution to facilitate the C–O borylation.
Comparing the fruitful achievement of allylic alcohol borylation, the same transformation with benzyl alcohols was less investigated until Shi’s 2015 discovery (Fig. 1D) [58]. In their work, a variety of naphthylmethanols were borylated using a simple palladium catalyst and bidentate phosphine. Similar conditions with the addition of Ti(IV) additive could include the less reactive benzyl alcohols in the scope, which constituted one of the rarely known catalytic systems that could manage the direct deoxygenative borylation of benzyl alcohols. Enlightened by Shi’s work, the group of Marder and Szabó uncovered a copper version of benzyl alcohol deoxy-borylation using a chelating phosphine ligand with a large bite angle (Fig. 1E) [59]. Notably, allylic alcohols were also effective substrates with this copper catalyst at lower temperatures.
Similar Cu-catalyzed borylation manifold with the variation of additive, solvent and temperature could lead to a divergent synthesis of alkyl-, vinyl- and allenylboronic acid derivatives from propargyl alcohols, which was reported by the group of Marder and Szabó as well as the one of Ye independently (Fig. 1F) [59], [60], [61]. General mechanistic traits included the formation of a Cu–B complex and a Ti(IV)-coordinated propargyl alkoxide. The reaction outcomes were determined by the specific reaction conditions and partially by the structural properties of the substrates.
Metal-free deoxy-borylation of allylic alcohols
The prosperous development of metal-catalyzed direct deoxygenative borylation brings about the curiosity in metal-free deoxy-borylation [62]. Foreseeably, conditions used to break the alcohol C–O bonds without the assistance of metal catalysts could be harsh. Although the Lewis acidic trivalent boron reagent could alleviate the problem to some extent, substrate scope in this area was still restricted to allylic alcohols only.
In this context, Fernández and Szabó et al. co-developed a base-catalyzed direct deoxygenative borylation reaction of tertiary allylic alcohols, which was promoted by the “ate” complex made of B2pin2 and Cs2CO3 via SN2′ fashion (Fig. 2A) [63]. Concurrently, Uchiyama and Hirano et al. [64] found an identical transformation using a stoichiometric amount of NaOMe (Fig. 2A). Density functional theory (DFT) calculation compared the routes of SN2′ and diborylation followed by boron-Wittig elimination, indicating that the latter might experience a less energetic profile.

Metal-free deoxygenative borylation of alcohols. THF, tetrahydrofuran.
Impressively, Fernández’s conditions could also give highly valuable 1,2,3-tris(boronates) products, which presumably originated from the follow-up alkene diborylation with the excessive B2pin2 after forming the nascent allylboronate. Moreover, propargyl alcohols could be diborylated with this protocol.
Using H-Bpin as the borylating reagent and catalytic n-BuLi, reductive relay hydroboration of allylic alcohol reaction was accomplished by Shi’s group (Fig. 2B) [65]. The reaction started from the formation of the OBpin borate, which could undertake either a hydroboration/boron Wittig reaction sequence or an SN2′ hydride attack to give the terminal alkene intermediate. Anti-Markovnikov hydroboration will give the desired product. Such a reductive tandem reaction was complementary to previous approaches that gave allylboronates, resulting in an array of linear-chain aliphatic boronates in good yields.
Deoxy-borylation of phenols
Direct deoxygenative borylation of simple phenols remains hitherto unknown, while many indirect methods have been investigated successfully with some activated derivatives like triflates (Fig. 3) [66, 67]. Classic Miyaura-type aromatic borylation failed with free phenol owing to the strong C(sp2)–O bond (BDE = 111 kcal/mol) and acidic phenolic hydrogen (pKa = 10). Despite these hurdles, Shi and his co-workers realized an unprecedented direct deoxygenative borylation of naphthol under nickel/N-heterocyclic carbene (Ni/NHC) catalysis [58]. Commercially available Ni(0) precursor was bound with a bulky NHC ligand, which borylated the 2-naphthol with B2pin2 in the absence of base. Unfortunately, the reaction efficiency was modest and other substrates, especially phenol, were unexplored.

Deoxygenative borylation of phenol. COD, 1,5-cyclootadiene; Ad, 1-adamantyl.
Ether deoxygenative borylation
The abundance of naturally occurring ether makes it an equally important entity like alcohol in the regime of deoxygenative borylation. The close C–O bond strength in alcohol and ether indicates a similar extent of difficulty for deoxygenation. Although the C–O bonds in both compounds share some chemical similarities, the deoxygenative systems differ considerably. The lack of alcoholic hydrogen could minimize some related issues; however, regioselective C–O cleavage of ethers merits extra consideration.
Deoxy-borylation of ethers for aromatic boron compound synthesis
Aryl ethers were challenging aromatic electrophiles in organometallic chemistry due to the strong C(sp2)–O bonds and poor leaving ability of alkoxides. For diary ethers, differentiation of sites for metal borylation was proved difficult, which could entail decreased yields and purification problems. To address these issues, Chatani, Tobisu and their co-workers pioneered the field by developing an Rh-catalyzed deoxygenative borylation with aryl 2-pyridyl ethers, wherein the coordination of pyridine nitrogen was found essential for the desired reactivities while minimizing the substrate decomposition (Fig. 4A, upper eq) [68]. Low-valent metal catalyst and electron-rich bulky ligand were the other two parameters that ensured the success of this transformation since they facilitated the C(sp2)–O oxidative addition and enforced the product-forming C(sp2)–B reductive elimination. Such a novel approach provided not only an effective route for arylboronate synthesis but also repurposed the utility of the 2-pyridyloxy group, which was originally designed for metal directionality.

Deoxygenative borylation of ethers for aromatic boron compound synthesis. COD, 1,5-cyclootadiene; NHC, N-heterocyclic carbene; DME, 1,2-dimethoxyethane; OAc, acetate; t-BuXPhos, 2-di-tert-butylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl; B2nep2, bis(neopentylglycolato)diboron; Cy, cyclohexyl.
Guided by the same logic, Chatani and Tobisu et al. [69] presented another aromatic deoxy-borylation strategy by nickel catalysis (Fig. 4A, middle eq). Simple Ni(II) salt and trialkylphosphine ligand were combined, which afforded a similar scope of aromatic boronates but at a lower reaction temperature and chemical cost. It was worth mentioning that both catalytic methods developed were also applicable to the analogous benzyl ethers.
Inspired by these two elegant precedents, Feng’s group contributed an Fe-catalyzed deoxygenative borylation reaction with the same pyridyl ethers (Fig. 4A, lower eq) [70]. Consistent with the Ni-catalyzed conditions, phosphine ligand and strong base were required. A broad range of ethers, which eventually derived from phenols, could be borylated in Feng’s case, although applying the same conditions to aniline derivatives resulted in unsatisfactory yields of deaminative products.
Anisole and its derivatives could be obtained from lignin depolymerization; therefore, it is conceived as an ideal aromatic electrophile from renewable sources. Toward the direct deoxygenative borylation of aryl methyl ethers, nickel and rhodium stand out again as optimal catalyst options. In 2015, Martin and his colleagues disclosed a ground-breaking direct ipso-borylation reaction for naphthyl or aryl methyl ethers via deoxygenation (Fig. 4B) [71]. A unique promotive effect was observed with HCO2Na as the base additive, and subtle sterics explained the higher reactivity with B2(nep)2 tentatively.
Nakao’s group reported an alternative approach to enable this tough transformation via ligand design (Fig. 4B) [72]. The rhodium was paired with an aluminyl ligand to form a heterobimetallic complex, which catalyzed the deoxy-borylation of different anisoles. A sacrificial trisubstituted alkene was added as the scavenger of HBpin, which was derived from an unidentified side reaction. Interestingly, this rhodium catalysis demonstrated complementary regioselectivity to nickel due to the metal-ligand cooperation in the former. Lewis acidic aluminum and the bulky ligand framework collectively favor the oxidative addition at the less hindered C(sp2)–OR. In the same work, hydrodeoxygenation was also possible with silane as the hydrogen donor.
Deoxy-borylation of ethers for vinylic and aliphatic boron compound synthesis
Deoxygenative borylation of other types of ethers parallels the aromatic ones, which could foster vinylic and aliphatic C-B bonds accordingly.
Taking advantage of nickel catalysis, Ling, Qiu and their group realized the deoxy-borylation of methyl vinyl ethers, giving various vinylboronic acid esters with high E-selectivity (Fig. 5A, upper eq) [73]. Switching to Cu/NHC catalyst, (allenylmethyl) benzyl ethers became viable substrates for vinylboronate preparation, which underwent a formal SN2′-type borylation via alkoxide elimination (Fig. 5A, middle eq) [74].

Deoxygenative borylation of ethers for aliphatic and vinylic boron compound synthesis. Acac, acetylacetonate; Xantphos, 4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthene; B2pin2, bis(pinacolato)diboron; 4-t-Bu-Py, 4-tert-butylpyridine; Mes, mesityl.
In 2016, Yorimitsu et al. [75] discovered an interesting borylative ring expansion with benzofuran (Fig. 5A, lower eq). Electron-rich NHC/Ni(0) was proposed to insert into the C2–O bond, which was transmetallated with B2pin2 and eliminated to form the spirocyclic vinylborates. After hydrolysis, benzoxaborins were produced. Moving such a single-atom editing strategy forward, Dong’s group made another breakthrough in the boron-insertion chemistry with simple ether rings by using dibromoborane and zinc dust (Fig. 5B) [75]. Mechanistically, the initial stage of this novel transformation mimicked the classic dealkylation mechanism enabled by boron trihalides, during which the bromide displacement occurred selectively at the alkyl site with the bulky mesitylborane. Subsequently, nickel catalyzed the reductive borylation and closed the bimetallic cycles by forming oxaborinane. Noticeably, the bulky mesityl group reduced the propensity of dimerization and enhanced products’ stability during purification. Under identical conditions, boron could also slip into C(sp3)–N bond in the N-heterocycles.
Multiboronates are important building blocks in synthetic planning due to the rich boron chemistry. Importantly, it could streamline deborylative transformations sequentially and selectively. Among them, 1,1,3-tris(boronates) remained elusive until the disclosure of Ge’s Co-catalyzed deoxygenative triboration with cinnamyl methyl ethers (Fig. 5C) [76]. The Bpin groups were installed stepwise, during which the allylboronate was believed to be a competent intermediate. Afterward, gem-diboration at the remote position was catalyzed by cobalt, and norbornene behaved as the terminal oxidant.
Aldehyde and ketone deoxygenative borylation
Carbonyl groups (C=O) of aldehyde and ketone consist of one C–O σ bond and one C–O π bond; therefore, it poses an additional challenge for the deoxygenative hydroboration or diboration at the carbonyl carbon. Oftentimes, α-hydroxylboronates were the final products, emphasizing the challenge of complete deoxygenation [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82]. Typically, deoxygenative borylation is achieved by activating the carbonyl substrate in situ, which could undergo borylation with relative ease.
General methods for deoxy-borylation of aldehydes and ketones
Vicinal diboration of alkenes by diboron is well-established for aliphatic boronate synthesis. In contrast, the analogous 1,2-diboration of carbonyl remained sluggish despite the structural similarity of C=C and C=O bonds. Presumably, this pivotal step could bring a highly activated C,O-diborylated intermediate, which not only reduces the C=O bond order but also facilitates the subsequent C–O cleavage due to the presence of two neighboring trivalent boron atoms.
Based on this assumption, Liu’s and Li’s groups presented two different strategies to achieve the deoxygenative borylation of aldehydes and ketones (Fig. 6). In 2019, Liu and his co-workers established a direct deoxygenative diboration for aldehydes and ketones with simple B2pin2 under Cu/NHC catalysis (Fig. 6A) [83]. This novel borylation reaction takes full advantage of the bis-electrophilicity of carbonyl compounds and could also be extended to an unprecedented silylborylation with pinB-SiMe2Ph. Mechanistically, such a deoxygenative difunctionalization involved a Cu-catalyzed C=O 1,2-diborylation step followed by a borylative migratory substitution assisted by a base. The former step was initially studied by Sadighi et al. [78, 84] and later computed by Lin’s and Marder’s group collaboratively [85], [86], [87]. Harnessing Liu’s conditions, a wide range of gem-diboronates and -silylboronates could be obtained from simple carbonyl starting materials. Impressively, small-molecule ketones (e.g., acetone) were also viable substrates, which remained unfeasible by conventional means.

General methods for direct deoxygenative borylation of aldehydes and ketones. B2pin2, bis(pinacolato)diboron; DMA, N,N-dimethylacetamide; B2cat2, bis(catecholato)diboron. Only key steps in the mechanism were shown. See the original papers for detailed description.
Capitalizing on the same C,O-diboronate, slight condition modification could channel the original diborylation reactivity towards either deoxygenative hydroboration or carboborylation smoothly, further expanding the repertoire of deoxy-borylative transformations of aldehydes and ketones (Fig. 6B and C). However, the latter proceeded at the expense of separate steps of introducing carbon nucleophiles. Very recently, such deoxygenative logic was further enriched by Xu’s group, who combined the Cu-catalyzed aldehyde diborylation and Ni reductive metallaphotoredox cross-couplings for the α,α-dialkyl boronates synthesis [88].
Encouraged by Liu’s elegant studies, particularly the base-mediated migratory substitution of C,O-diboronates, Li and his colleague conceived a similar scenario wherein the first vicinal borylation was under reagent control, therefore, eliminating the metal catalysts from the overall deoxygenative borylation (Fig. 6D) [89]. The key finding in Li’s case was a uniquely enabling diboron reagent, B2cat2, which unified the strong Lewis acidity and oxophilicity, promoting the formation of various benzylboronates from substituted benzaldehydes and aryl ketones via deoxygenation [17, 90]. Interestingly, a divergent reaction outcome was observed when subjecting the aliphatic substrates to similar reductive borylation in an anhydrous coordinating solvent, which exclusively gave 1,1,2-tris(boronates) as highly useful products.
In Li’s tentative mechanism, the unique solvent effect led to the assembly of a putative ternary boron complex. Consistent with Liu’s proposal, 1,2-diborylation, migratory bora-substitution and protodeboronation with H2O will give the monoboration reactivity. Under an analogous mechanistic framework, vinylboronate could be derived via elimination, which was diborylated to deliver the tris(boronate).
Methods for deoxy-borylation of ketones
Ketone deoxygenative borylation could be operated via alkene or enolate by other means. For the former, Zhao’s group launched a systematic study of Rh-catalyzed deoxygenative borylation of ketones, which could offer various mono-, di- and tris(boronates) selectively (Fig. 7A) [91, 92]. By fine-tuning the reaction conditions with ligand choice, borylating reagent and base additive, alkylboronates, vinylboronates, 1,1-vinyldiboronates, and 1,1,2-tris(boronates) could be acquired from simple ketones with high chemo- and regioselectivity, which was governed by the ligated rhodium. In Zhao’s case, the alkene intermediate was validated experimentally and computationally, which resulted from the deoxygenative desaturation under rhodium catalysis. Subsequently, the alkene was borylated under a similar catalytic manifold to provide the desired products.

Deoxygenative borylation of ketones. COD, 1,5-cyclootadiene; B2pin2, bis(pinacolato)diboron. IPE, 2-isoproproxypropane.
Alternatively, the ketone deoxygenative borylation could be conducted without transition metals. In 2019, Liu’s group contributed a stepwise deoxy-borylation protocol using the ketone-derived enolates (Fig. 7B). Assisted by the Lewis acidic Mg(OMe)2, which might enhance the polarity of C=O, thereafter, the propensity of boron migration, the enolate was converted into an α,β-borylated alkoxide. This set the stage for a highly stereoselective boron-Wittig reaction and afforded the numerous trisubstituted and tetrasubstituted vinylboronates. Notably, a one-pot deoxygenative borylation reaction of free carboxylic acid was also described in the same work, wherein the acid was transformed into an O-borylated enolate (vinylborate) upon the cooperative action of α,α-diboroalkane and MeLi [93]. Later, the vinylborate was deoxygenated, giving the (Z)-vinylboronate as the major product.
Deoxygenative borylation of carboxylic acids and esters
Decarboxylative and decarbonylative borylation dominated the synthetic practice of organoboron from the derivatives of carboxylic acids and carboxylates. In contrast, direct deoxygenative borylation of this class of oxygenated compounds considerably lags behind due in part to the prohibitively high overall energy barrier of cleaving three C–O bonds for exhaustive deoxygenation. Besides, the carboxylic hydrogen is incompatible with most basic and reducing conditions, while they are common in borylation protocols. Although the highly oxidized carboxylic carbon provides opportunities for accessing intermediates in lower oxidation states and setting the stage for tandem borylation by the means mentioned above, strong reductants demanded for the initial reduction often lead to over deoxygenation and other off-target issues. To this end, a borylation system with robust and balanced reducing capability is required to confront this challenge, which could be resolved by either reagent or catalyst development.
Challenged by this perception, Li’s group conceived a reagent-enabled stepwise deoxygenation scenario for free carboxylic acids, which were firstly degraded into a more reactive carbonyl intermediate via deoxygenation and further subjected to consecutive reductive borylation (Fig. 8A). For this purpose, a novel deoxy-borylation protocol was established for free carboxylic acids or their sodium salts based on their prior efforts on carbonyl reductive borylation [94]. B2cat2 was identified as the only viable reagent in this case, which effected the acid C–O borylation in a more robust amide solvent (hexamethylphosphoramide, HMPA) and at a slightly higher temperature (100 °C). Consistent with their previous report, divergent reactivities were observed as benzoic acids or sodium benzoates gave benzyl monoboronates while aliphatic substrates (e.g., acetic acid) offer 1,1,2-(trisboronates). Mechanistically, B2cat2 served as both the oxygen transfer agent and boron source, and acylboron might be involved as a key intermediate, which underwent selective deoxy-borylation depending on its substitution patterns. Moreover, such a novel paradigm opened access to some unique boronates (e.g., structurally complex or isotope-labeled ones) that were of conceivable challenges under the conventional manifold.

Deoxygenative borylation of carboxylic acids and esters. HMPA, hexamethylphosphoramide; B2cat2, bis(catecholato)diboron.
Through advancing their Cu-catalyzed deoxy-borylation system for aldehydes and ketones, Liu’s group realized the direct conversion of various carboxylic esters to α-diboronates under iron catalysis [95] (Fig. 8B). By fine-tuning the alkoxide additive and alcoholic source, the esters could be hydrogenated into aldehydes. By suppressing the formation of excessive Fe-H species, therefore, minimizing the overreduction, the subsequent gem-diborylation occurred smoothly. With the optimal combination of NaOt-Bu and EtOH, simple and complex esters could be diborylated easily, providing a library of gem-diborylated alkanes that were otherwise challenging to prepare based on the prior art. Interestingly, reductive hydroborylation biased the aliphatic esters over aromatic ones under Liu’s conditions.
Conclusion
Direct deoxygenative borylation is of high interest in academic and industrial settings, representing one of the stepping stones for the science community toward future sustainability. This review covers the direct deoxy-borylation of earth-abundant oxygenated feedstocks in the recent 20 years and arranges them by alcohols, ethers, aldehydes/ketones, carboxylic acids/esters, which have progressively increased numbers of C–O bonds and, in principle, more difficulties for complete deoxygenation. In each category, substrate scope and mechanistic features were emphasized for some significant contributions and selected works. The similarities and differences of the key conditions and mechanistic traits between each class of collected examples were discussed.
En route to a more fruitful toolkit of direct deoxygenative borylation with higher reaction efficiency and broader substrate scope, some obstacles need to be surmounted in the next decades. In general, these paradigms still mandate high temperatures and strong bases. Simple and complex oxygenated molecules, especially alcohols and phenols, are beyond the reach of the current mainstay. Moreover, enantioselectivity is considerably underexplored in this field, although the asymmetric borylation of activated derivatives via deoxygenation, decarbonylation and decarboxylation has gained popularity in chiral organoboron synthesis. These limitations have compromised the wider uptake of direct deoxygenative borylation in various fields.
Toward this end, new thoughts on the catalyst and reagent design and modern technologies (photochemistry, electrochemistry and biocatalysis, among others) are worth of continuous research efforts. Since these oxygenous compounds are interchangeable through redox manipulation, systems featuring unified conditions could be envisioned, which could upgrade these promising yet underutilized feedstocks for the rapid buildup of the organoboron library. More importantly, during this exploration, the functionalization and defunctionalization logic might be applicable to other related interesting starting materials.
Acknowledgments
I thank the IUPAC and Solvay for the 2022 IUPAC-Solvay International Award for Young Chemists and Pure and Applied Chemistry for this invited review. I am grateful to Prof. Chao-Jun Li for his guidance and support during my doctoral study at McGill University. This review is dedicated to his upcoming 60th birthday. Besides, I would like to acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Chia-Yu Huang (Li’s group at McGill University) for his immense discussion of this manuscript. Moreover, I am indebted to Miss Shuzhen Zhou for her continuous encouragement during my manuscript preparation.
References
[1] N. Miyaura, A. Suzuki. Chem. Rev.95(7), 2457 (1995).10.1021/cr00039a007Suche in Google Scholar
[2] D. G. Hall. In Boronic Acids, D. G. Hall (Ed.), pp. 1–133. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (2011).10.1002/9783527639328.ch1Suche in Google Scholar
[3] E. C. Neeve, S. J. Geier, I. A. Mkhalid, S. A. Westcott, T. B. Marder. Chem. Rev.116(16), 9091 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00193Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] A. B. Cuenca, R. Shishido, H. Ito, E. Fernández. Chem. Soc. Rev.46(2), 415 (2017).10.1039/C6CS00692BSuche in Google Scholar
[5] S. Namirembe, J. P. Morken. Chem. Soc. Rev.48(13), 3464 (2019).10.1039/C9CS00180HSuche in Google Scholar
[6] M. Wang, Z. Shi. Chem. Rev.120(15), 7348 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00384Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] C.-Y. Huang, J. Li, C.-J. Li. Chem. Sci.13(19), 5465 (2022).10.1039/D2SC00202GSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[8] G. A. Molander, N. Ellis. Acc. Chem. Res.40(4), 275 (2007).10.1021/ar050199qSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] D. Leonori, V. K. Aggarwal. Acc. Chem. Res.47(10), 3174 (2014).10.1021/ar5002473Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] J. Li, A. S. Grillo, M. D. Burke. Acc. Chem. Res.48(8), 2297 (2015).10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00128Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[11] J. C. Tellis, C. B. Kelly, D. N. Primer, M. Jouffroy, N. R. Patel, G. A. Molander. Acc. Chem. Res.49(7), 1429 (2016).10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00214Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[12] K. Hong, X. Liu, J. P. Morken. J. Am. Chem. Soc.136(30), 10581 (2014).10.1021/ja505455zSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[13] L. Zhang, G. J. Lovinger, E. K. Edelstein, A. A. Szymaniak, M. P. Chierchia, J. P. Morken. Science351(6268), 70 (2016).10.1126/science.aad6080Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[14] M. Kischkewitz, K. Okamoto, C. Mück-Lichtenfeld, A. Studer. Science355(6328), 936 (2017).10.1126/science.aal3803Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] B. Lee, P. J. Chirik. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142(5), 2429 (2020).10.1021/jacs.9b11944Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[16] J. C. Tellis, D. N. Primer, G. A. Molander. Science345(6195), 433 (2014).10.1126/science.1253647Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[17] J. Li, C.-Y. Huang, C.-J. Li. Chem8(9), 2419 (2022).10.1016/j.chempr.2022.05.011Suche in Google Scholar
[18] C. Ballatore, D. M. Huryn, A. B. SmithIII. ChemMedChem8(3), 385 (2013).10.1002/cmdc.201200585Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[19] J. Plescia, N. Moitessier. Eur. J. Med. Chem.195, 112270 (2020).10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112270Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] K. M. Waltz, J. F. Hartwig. Science277(5323), 211 (1997).10.1126/science.277.5323.211Suche in Google Scholar
[21] H. Chen, S. Schlecht, T. C. Semple, J. F. Hartwig. Science287(5460), 1995 (2000).10.1126/science.287.5460.1995Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] C. T. Yang, Z. Q. Zhang, H. Tajuddin, C. C. Wu, J. Liang, J. H. Liu, Y. Fu, M. Czyzewska, P. G. Steel, T. B. Marder, L. Liu. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51(2), 528 (2012).10.1002/anie.201106299Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] T. C. Atack, R. M. Lecker, S. P. Cook. J. Am. Chem. Soc.136(27), 9521 (2014).10.1021/ja505199uSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] W. N. Palmer, J. V. Obligacion, I. Pappas, P. J. Chirik. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138(3), 766 (2016).10.1021/jacs.5b12249Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] T. C. Atack, S. P. Cook. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138(19), 6139 (2016).10.1021/jacs.6b03157Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] W. N. Palmer, C. Zarate, P. J. Chirik. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139(7), 2589 (2017).10.1021/jacs.6b12896Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[27] D. Hu, L. Wang, P. Li. Org. Lett.19(10), 2770 (2017).10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01181Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[28] D. Mazzarella, G. Magagnano, B. Schweitzer-Chaput, P. Melchiorre. ACS Catal.9(7), 5876 (2019).10.1021/acscatal.9b01482Suche in Google Scholar
[29] R. Oeschger, B. Su, I. Yu, C. Ehinger, E. Romero, S. He. J. Hartwig. Science368(6492), 736 (2020).10.1126/science.aba6146Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[30] L. Zhang, Z. Q. Wu, L. Jiao. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.59(5), 2095 (2020).10.1002/anie.201912564Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[31] J. W. B. Fyfe, A. J. B. Watson. Chem3(1), 31 (2017).10.1016/j.chempr.2017.05.008Suche in Google Scholar
[32] J. Hu, G. Wang, S. Li, Z. Shi. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.57(46), 15227 (2018).10.1002/anie.201809608Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[33] F. Sandfort, F. Strieth-Kalthoff, F. J. R. Klauck, M. J. James, F. Glorius. Chem. Eur. J.24(65), 17210 (2018).10.1002/chem.201804246Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[34] F. W. Friese, A. Studer. Chem. Sci.10(37), 8503 (2019).10.1039/C9SC03765ASuche in Google Scholar
[35] V. D. Nguyen, V. T. Nguyen, S. Jin, H. T. Dang, O. V. Larionov. Tetrahedron75(5), 584 (2019).10.1016/j.tet.2018.12.040Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[36] Y. Maekawa, Z. T. Ariki, M. Nambo, C. M. Crudden. Org. Biomol. Chem.17(31), 7300 (2019).10.1039/C9OB01099HSuche in Google Scholar
[37] H. Li, L. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Wang. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.51(12), 2943 (2012).10.1002/anie.201108139Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[38] Q. Xiao, Y. Zhang, J. Wang. Acc. Chem. Res.46(2), 236 (2013).10.1021/ar300101kSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[39] H. Li, X. Shangguan, Z. Zhang, S. Huang, Y. Zhang, J. Wang. Org. Lett.16(2), 448 (2014).10.1021/ol403338sSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[40] Y. Xia, J. Wang. Chem. Soc. Rev.46(8), 2306 (2017).10.1039/C6CS00737FSuche in Google Scholar
[41] Y. Xia, J. Wang. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142(24), 10592 (2020).10.1021/jacs.0c04445Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[42] J. Li, C.-Y. Huang, C.-J. Li. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.61(10), e202112770 (2021).10.1002/anie.202112770Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[43] Y.-R. Luo. Comprehensive Handbook of Chemical Bond Energies, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2007).10.1201/9781420007282Suche in Google Scholar
[44] C.-J. Li. Green Chem.18(7), 1836 (2016).10.1039/C6GC90029ASuche in Google Scholar
[45] C.-J. Li. Chem1(3), 423 (2016).10.1016/j.chempr.2016.08.007Suche in Google Scholar
[46] J. Li, C.-Y. Huang, C.-J. Li. Trends Chem4(6), 479 (2022).10.1016/j.trechm.2022.03.006Suche in Google Scholar
[47] V. J. Olsson, S. Sebelius, N. Selander, K. J. Szabo. J. Am. Chem. Soc.128(14), 4588 (2006).10.1021/ja060468nSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[48] N. Selander, A. Kipke, S. Sebelius, K. J. Szabó. J. Am. Chem. Soc.129(44), 13723 (2007).10.1021/ja074917aSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[49] G. Dutheuil, N. Selander, K. J. Szabo, V. K. Aggarwal. Synthesis (14), 2293 (2008).10.1055/s-2008-1067144Suche in Google Scholar
[50] N. Selander, K. J. Szabo. J. Org. Chem.74(15), 5695 (2009).10.1021/jo9008673Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[51] N. Selander, K. J. Szabó. Dalton Trans. (32), 6267 (2009).10.1039/b903115dSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[52] N. Selander, J. R. Paasch, K. J. Szabó. J. Am. Chem. Soc.133(3), 409 (2011).10.1021/ja1096732Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[53] M. Raducan, R. Alam, K. J. Szabó. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51(52), 13050 (2012).10.1002/anie.201207951Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[54] J. M. Larsson, K. J. Szabó. J. Am. Chem. Soc.135(1), 443 (2013).10.1021/ja309860hSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[55] Y. Zhou, H. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Zhao, C. Zhang, J. Qu. Synth. Commun.48(7), 795 (2018).10.1080/00397911.2017.1422764Suche in Google Scholar
[56] W. Su, T. T. Wang, X. Tian, J. R. Han, X. L. Zhen, S. M. Fan, Y. X. You, Y. K. Zhang, R. X. Qiao, Q. Cheng, S. Liu. Org. Lett.23(23), 9094 (2021).10.1021/acs.orglett.1c03359Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[57] H. Miura, Y. Hachiya, H. Nishio, Y. Fukuta, T. Toyomasu, K. Kobayashi, Y. Masaki, T. Shishido. ACS Catal.11(2), 758 (2021).10.1021/acscatal.0c03771Suche in Google Scholar
[58] Z.-C. Cao, F.-X. Luo, W.-J. Shi, Z.-J. Shi. Org. Chem. Front.2(11), 1505 (2015).10.1039/C5QO00243ESuche in Google Scholar
[59] L. Mao, K. J. Szabo, T. B. Marder. Org. Lett.19(5), 1204 (2017).10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00256Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[60] L. Mao, R. Bertermann, K. Emmert, K. J. Szabo, T. B. Marder. Org. Lett.19(24), 6586 (2017).10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03294Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[61] L. Mao, C. Li, L. Xiang, D. Fu, W. Ma, Q. Ye. J. Org. Chem.85(4), 2823 (2020).10.1021/acs.joc.9b03319Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[62] W. Liu, J. Li, C.-Y. Huang, C.-J. Li. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.59(5), 1786 (2020).10.1002/anie.201909138Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[63] N. Miralles, R. Alam, K. J. Szabo, E. Fernandez. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55(13), 4303 (2016).10.1002/anie.201511255Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[64] K. Harada, M. Nogami, K. Hirano, D. Kurauchi, H. Kato, K. Miyamoto, T. Saito, M. Uchiyama. Org. Chem. Front.3(5), 565 (2016).10.1039/C6QO00009FSuche in Google Scholar
[65] Z. C. Wang, D. Shen, J. Gao, X. Jia, Y. Xu, S. L. Shi. Chem. Commun.55(60), 8848 (2019).10.1039/C9CC03459ESuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[66] Z. Qiu, C.-J. Li. Chem. Rev.120(18), 10454 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00088Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[67] Z. Qiu, H. Zeng, C.-J. Li. Acc. Chem. Res.53(10), 2395 (2020).10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00479Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[68] H. Kinuta, M. Tobisu, N. Chatani. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137(4), 1593 (2015).10.1021/ja511622eSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[69] M. Tobisu, J. Zhao, H. Kinuta, T. Furukawa, T. Igarashi, N. Chatani. Adv. Synth. Catal.358(15), 2417 (2016).10.1002/adsc.201600336Suche in Google Scholar
[70] X. Zeng, Y. Zhang, Z. Liu, S. Geng, Y. He, Z. Feng. Org. Lett.22(8), 2950 (2020).10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00679Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[71] C. Zarate, R. Manzano, R. Martin. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137(21), 6754 (2015).10.1021/jacs.5b03955Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[72] R. Seki, N. Hara, T. Saito, Y. Nakao. J. Am. Chem. Soc.143(17), 6388 (2021).10.1021/jacs.1c03038Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[73] X. Qiu, Y. Li, L. Zhou, P. Chen, F. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Ling. Org. Lett.22(16), 6424 (2020).10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02236Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[74] K. Semba, T. Fujihara, J. Terao, Y. Tsuji. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.52(47), 12400 (2013).10.1002/anie.201306843Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[75] H. Saito, S. Otsuka, K. Nogi, H. Yorimitsu. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138(47), 15315 (2016).10.1021/jacs.6b10255Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[76] W. J. Teo, X. Yang, Y. Y. Poon, S. Ge. Nat. Commun.11(1), 5193 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-19039-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[77] T. B. Marder, N. C. Norman. Top. Catal.5(1), 63 (1998).10.1023/A:1019145818515Suche in Google Scholar
[78] D. S. Laitar, E. Y. Tsui, J. P. Sadighi. J. Am. Chem. Soc.128(34), 11036 (2006).10.1021/ja064019zSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[79] H. E. Burks, J. P. Morken. Chem. Commun. (45), 4717 (2007).10.1039/b707779cSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[80] M. L. McIntosh, C. M. Moore, T. B. Clark. Org. Lett.12(9), 1996 (2010).10.1021/ol100468fSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[81] W. Guan, A. K. Michael, M. L. McIntosh, L. Koren-Selfridge, J. P. Scott, T. B. Clark. J. Org. Chem.79(15), 7199 (2014).10.1021/jo500773tSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[82] T. B. Clark. Asian J. Org. Chem.5(1), 31 (2016).10.1002/ajoc.201500284Suche in Google Scholar
[83] L. Wang, T. Zhang, W. Sun, Z. He, C. Xia, Y. Lan, C. Liu. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139(14), 5257 (2017).10.1021/jacs.7b02518Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[84] D. S. Laitar, P. Müller, J. P. Sadighi. J. Am. Chem. Soc.127(49), 17196 (2005).10.1021/ja0566679Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[85] H. Zhao, Z. Lin, T. B. Marder. J. Am. Chem. Soc.128(49), 15637 (2006).10.1021/ja063671rSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[86] H. Zhao, L. Dang, T. B. Marder, Z. Lin. J. Am. Chem. Soc.130(16), 5586 (2008).10.1021/ja710659ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[87] L. Dang, H. Zhao, Z. Lin, T. B. Marder. Organometallics27(6), 1178 (2008).10.1021/om700999wSuche in Google Scholar
[88] W. Xu, P. Zheng, J. Zhou, Z. Hu, T. XU. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.61(49), e202214213 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202214213.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[89] J. Li, H. Wang, Z. Qiu, C. Y. Huang, C.-J. Li. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142(30), 13011 (2020).10.1021/jacs.0c03813Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[90] J. Li, C.-Y. Huang, J.-T. Han, C.-J. Li. ACS Catal.11(22), 14148 (2021).10.1021/acscatal.1c04073Suche in Google Scholar
[91] L. Tao, X. Guo, J. Li, R. Li, Z. Lin, W. Zhao. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142(42), 18118 (2020).10.1021/jacs.0c07854Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[92] B. Zhang, X. Xu, L. Tao, Z. Lin, W. Zhao. ACS Catal.11(15), 9495 (2021).10.1021/acscatal.1c02685Suche in Google Scholar
[93] Y. Hu, W. Sun, T. Zhang, N. Xu, J. Xu, Y. Lan, C. Liu. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58(44), 15813 (2019).10.1002/anie.201909235Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[94] J. Li, C.-Y. Huang, M. Ataya, R. Z. Khaliullin, C.-J. Li. Nat. Commun.12(1), 4970 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-25229-8Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[95] Z. He, Q. Zhu, X. Hu, L. Wang, C. Xia, C. Liu. Org. Chem. Front.6(7), 900 (2019).10.1039/C9QO00007KSuche in Google Scholar
© 2022 IUPAC & De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For more information, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Invited paper
- Direct deoxygenative borylation
- IUPAC Technical Reports
- Reference materials for phase equilibrium studies. 2. Solid–liquid equilibria (IUPAC Technical Report)
- Minimum requirements for publishing hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur stable-isotope delta results (IUPAC Technical Report)
- Preparation, formatting and review of IUPAC Technical Reports and Recommendations, IUPAC-sponsored books, or other items carrying the IUPAC label
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Invited paper
- Direct deoxygenative borylation
- IUPAC Technical Reports
- Reference materials for phase equilibrium studies. 2. Solid–liquid equilibria (IUPAC Technical Report)
- Minimum requirements for publishing hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur stable-isotope delta results (IUPAC Technical Report)
- Preparation, formatting and review of IUPAC Technical Reports and Recommendations, IUPAC-sponsored books, or other items carrying the IUPAC label