Abstract
Zinc oxide (ZnO) particles were synthesized from aqueous solution by chemical precipitation method. Self-aggregated rod-shaped particles were obtained. Silane modification and ultrasonic dispersion were compared in terms of effectiveness on particle deagglomeration. Complete deagglomeration was achieved with ultrasonic dispersion for untreated particles. Surface-treated and/or ultrasound-applied ZnO particles were incorporated into PHBV matrix by melt-extrusion. Good particle dispersion was achieved in the composites regardless of the agglomeration observed in particles prior to polymer matrix inclusion. Number of regular, rod-shaped particles observed was higher in the composites produced with ultrasound-dispersed particles. ZnO crystals did not affect the melting and crystallization temperatures of PHBV composites, but the degree of crystallinity was decreased. Thermal degradation temperature of PHBV was slightly decreased with ZnO addition. Tensile strength, elongation at break, and toughness of PHBV were affected positively when ultrasound-dispersed (treated or untreated) particles were incorporated into PHBV matrix; whereas application of both ultrasound and silane treatment produced better results.
Introduction
Research on bio-based and bio-degradable polymers has come into prominence due to petroleum dependency of conventional plastics and environmental considerations related to increasing plastic wastes. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are a family of linear aliphatic polyesters that can be derived from bacterial fermentation and degraded in very short periods in microbiologically active environments [1]. The most common type is PHB (polyhydroxybutyrate), despite its thermoplastic behavior, lacks competitive physical and thermal properties that limit its industrial usage. It exhibits high crystallinity, slow crystallization kinetics, relatively poor thermal stability, and brittleness. Copolymerization of 3-hydroxybutyrate with 3-hydroxyvalerate produces PHBV (3-polyhydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), with decreased crystallinity and brittleness to some extent compared to PHB [2].
Incorporation of inorganic particles [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] or natural fibers [8], [9], [10] of various forms and sizes into biopolymer matrices is the prevailing approach for enhancement of biopolymer properties. As dimensions of the particles approach to nano-scale, high surface area to volume ratio of the particles creates an immense interfacial area between the particles and the polymer. Thus, reinforcing effects can be attained at lower particle loadings. On the other hand, poor interfacial compatibility between inorganic particles and organic polymers and the high surface energy of the particles lead to particle agglomeration, hindering desired improvements in polymer properties. Therefore, maintaining compatible polymer-particle interface and homogeneous distribution of particles within the polymer matrix are of crucial importance. Chemical modification of inorganic particle surfaces with suitable coupling agents is known to improve interfacial compatibility by increasing hydrophobicity of the particles; however, uniform particle coverage and complete prevention of agglomeration cannot always be achieved [11]. Ultrasonication is an effective method used in breakage of sub-micron particle agglomerates in suspensions, creating acoustic cavitation forces that overcome cohesive forces in agglomerates [12], [13], [14].
In this study, zinc oxide (ZnO) particles were synthesized from aqueous solution by chemical precipitation method. Surface modification and/or ultrasonic dispersion were applied to ZnO particles and the two methods were compared in terms of effectiveness on particle deagglomeration. ZnO particles were then incorporated into PHBV polymer matrix by melt-extrusion method. The effects of the particles on the thermal on mechanical properties of PHBV were investigated.
Experimental
ZnO particles synthesis
ZnO crystals were synthesized by chemical precipitation method [15] from aqueous solution of zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2.6H2O, Fluka Analytical, 99%) and hexamethylenetetramine ((CH2)6N4, Merck, 99%). Crystallization reaction was carried out in a 2 L-capacity, triple-neck, jacketed reactor at 95°C reaction temperature and for 90 min. Inlet concentration of the reaction species were 0.06 M.
Surface modification was applied to ZnO particles using 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate silane (CH2=C(CH3)CO2(CH2)3Si(OCH3)3, MPS, Sigma-Aldrich, 98%) as coupling agent. MPS was first hydrolyzed in ethanol-water solution at pH=5.0 in an ultrasonic bath. The amount of MPS used for 1 g of ZnO was 1.67 g. ZnO particles were added into the solution to react with silane molecules for 2 h. The particles were then separated by filtration and drying.
Ultrasonic dispersion of particles in ethanol-water solution (pH=5.0) was performed using Sonics Vibra Cell ultrasonic processor with maximum power input of 750 W, with an ultrasonic probe of 13 mm diameter, at 20 kHz frequency and 40% amplitude. ZnO particles were then separated from the solvent by filtration and drying.
Characterization of ZnO particles
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the particles were taken using Zeiss EVO-LS at an accelerating voltage of 10.0 kV. Samples were coated by Au-Pd prior to examination.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis was performed on untreated and silane-treated particles, using Bruker Optics Alpha-P, in the 400–4000 cm−1 region and at a resolution of 4 cm−1. Spectra were obtained by collecting the average of at least 20 scans.
Fabrication of PHBV/ZnO biocomposites
PHBV (valerate content of 8 wt%) was kindly supplied by AdMajoris Company, France with the trade name of Maj’Eco FN000HA. Incorporation of ZnO particles into PHBV matrix was performed using a twin-screw extruder (Rondol, 10 mm Microlab, L/D=20) with a temperature profile of 90-135-160-160-150°C from feed to die and a screw speed of 80 rpm. PHBV/ZnO biocomposite pellets obtained after extrusion were compression molded into biocomposite sheets of 0.8 mm thickness using a mechanical press at 165°C temperature and 30, 70, and 90 bar consecutive pressures.
Characterization of PHBV/ZnO biocomposites
SEM images of PHBV composites were taken by Philips XL30 ESEM-FEG at an accelerating voltage of 5.0 kV. Samples were coated with Au prior to examination.
Thermal properties of PHBV and its composites were evaluated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) using Perkin Elmer (Pyris 1) under nitrogen atmosphere. Samples with 10 mg mass were heated from 0°C to 190°C (1st heating run), kept at this temperature for 2 min to erase thermal history, cooled from 190°C to 0°C (cooling run), kept at this temperature for 2 min, and then heated to 190°C (2nd heating run). The heating/cooling rate was 10°C/min for all three steps. Melting temperature (Tm) and enthalpy of fusion (ΔHm) values were determined from the heating curves and crystallization temperature (Tc) and crystallization enthalpy (ΔHc) values were determined from the cooling curves. Degree of crystallinity (Xc) was calculated from the equation:
where ΔH0 is the melting enthalpy of 100% crystalline PHBV (taken as 146 J/g [16], considering the low valerate content of PHBV in this study) and w is the weight fraction of PHBV in the blend.
Thermal stability of PHBV and its composites were analyzed by thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) using Perkin Elmer (Pyris Diamond) thermal analysis instrument. The samples (10 mg mass) were heated from room temperature to 550°C with a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen flow. Decomposition peak temperatures (Tmax) of the samples were determined from derivative TG curves as the temperatures corresponding to the highest weight loss rate.
Uniaxial tensile testing was performed according to ASTM D882-12 standard, using Instron 5982 Universal testing machine. An initial load of 1 N was used and the cross-head speed was 5 mm/min. Tensile strength at break, Young’s modulus, and elongation at break values were determined from the stress-strain curves. Toughness value was calculated as the area underneath the stress-strain curve.
Results and discussion
Synthesis of ZnO particles and incorporation into PHBV matrix
ZnO crystals were synthesized by chemical precipitation method from aqueous solution of zinc nitrate hexahydrate ((Zn(NO3)2.6H2O) and hexamethylenetetramine ((CH2)6N4). The chemical reaction started with decomposition of (CH2)6N4 into formaldehyde and ammonia, and then to ammonium cations and hydroxide anions [15]. The formation of ZnO precipitate takes places according to the following reaction:
The ZnO crystals obtained at the end of the reaction were rod-shaped particles, coalescing into asterisk-like structures at their centers (Fig. 1a). Formation of rod-shaped ZnO arrays at high reaction temperatures by self-aggregation mechanism was previously reported [17]. In fabrication of polymer-inorganic particle composites, particle aggregation is known to affect composite properties negatively. Therefore, surface modification and ultrasonic dispersion methods were applied to the crystals aiming the breakage of particle agglomerates into singular, discrete particles.

SEM images of synthesized ZnO particles (a) before and (b) after silane modification.
Surface modification was applied using MPS as coupling agent. Modification of ZnO nanostructures using MPS in ethanol solution and in acidic conditions was previously reported to produce hydrophobic ZnO surfaces [18]. SEM image of the crystals after silane modification is given in Fig. 1b. Regular array structures observed in the SEM images of crystals before silane modification seem to be broken by silanization. Nevertheless, severe particle agglomeration could not be avoided.
FT-IR spectra of untreated and silane-treated particles (Fig. 2) denote that silane was chemically bonded to the particles after silanization procedure. The characteristic peak related to Zn-O stretching can be observed between 400 and 500 cm−1, for both untreated and silane-treated particles. The peaks observed around 1020–1090 cm−1 were associated with Si-O-Si bonds. The broad peak around 3200 was associated with H-bonded OH stretching and could be originating from water or ethanol. The peaks at 2949, 1713, 1630, and 1290 were related to –CH2 stretching vibration, C=O stretching, –C=C stretching, and C–H in-plane bending, respectively. The broad peak around 700 cm−1 was related to cis–C–H out-of-plane bending [19].

FT-IR spectrum of untreated and silane-treated ZnO particles.
For the purpose of deagglomeration of silane-treated particles, ultrasonic agitation was applied using an ultrasonic horn. A previous study on effectiveness of ultrasonic dispersion on ZnO suspension in water [12] reported that majority of deagglomeration and size reduction occurred within the 20–30 min of ultrasound application. Ultrasonication times in this study were selected as 15 and 60 min, whereas SEM images (Fig. 3a d b) revealed that complete deagglomeration could not be achieved even after 60 min of ultrasonication. The chemical bonds forming between particles after silane modification might have prevented deagglomeration by ultrasonication. Ultrasonic dispersion was also applied to untreated ZnO particles for comparison purpose. When untreated particles were used, 60 min of ultrasonication was very effective in deagglomeration and singular rod-shaped particles could be obtained (Fig. 3c).

SEM images of ZnO particles after (a) silane treatment and 15 min ultrasound application, (b) silane treatment and 60 min ultrasound application, and (c) 60 min ultrasound application (no treatment).
Particle size distribution was analyzed by statistical analysis of SEM image of deagglomerated particles after ultrasound application. Mean value of the length of ZnO rods were calculated as 3590±1880 nm and the mean diameter of the particles were calculated as 394±124 nm. Particle diameter was defined as the highest distance between opposite corners across the hexagonal face, measured at the thickest part of the crystals. Mean aspect ratio (L/D) of the particles was determined as 9.1.
ZnO particles were incorporated into PHBV matrix after silanization and/or ultrasonication in order to compare the effects of these processes on the thermal and mechanical properties of PHBV. ZnO content of 1% (w/w) was selected, since dispersion of particles is easier at lower particle loadings. The formulations and sample coding of the PHBV/ZnO biocomposites are given in Table 1.
Formulations and sample coding for PHBV/ZnO biocomposites.
| Sample code | ZnO content (wt%) |
PHBV content (wt%) |
Surface treatment | Ultrasound application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHBV | – | 100 | – | – |
| PHBV/ZnO(S) | 1 | 99 | + | – |
| PHBV/ZnO(S-U) | 1 | 99 | + | 60 min |
| PHBV/ZnO(U) | 1 | 99 | – | 60 min |
Characterization of PHBV/ZnO biocomposites
Distribution of ZnO particles within the PHBV matrix was evaluated by SEM (Fig. 4). All composite samples showed considerably good particle dispersion regardless of the degree of particle agglomeration observed before incorporation into the matrix, emphasizing the effectiveness of melt-extrusion process on homogeneous particle distribution. However, appearance of regular rod-shaped particles rather than irregular ZnO particulates was higher in PHBV/ZnO(U) composite sample, as complete deagglomeration was achieved with these particles prior to inclusion into polymer.

SEM images of (a) PHBV/ZnO(S), (b) PHBV/ZnO(S-U), and (c) PHBV/ZnO(U) composites.
Melting and crystallization behavior of PHBV and its composites were investigated by DSC analysis. First heating scans of all samples (Fig. 5a) exhibited a double-melting peak behavior, indicating the existence of two crystal phases. Bimodal melting behavior was previously explained by melting, recrystallization, and remelting during the heating scan [20]. If the heating rate is sufficiently low, less perfect crystals find time to melt and recrystallize into more stable crystals. More stable crystals then melt at a higher temperature. Low-temperature melting peak (Tm1) was observed around 174°C for all samples, whereas high-temperature peak (Tm2) was around 181°C (Table 2). The intensity of the Tm2 peak was increased for ZnO-added composites, implying more crystals recrystallizing into more stable crystals probably due to the increased mobility of polymer chains. This effect was lowest for P/ZnO(S) among the composite samples, while it was the highest for the P/ZnO(U) sample. Total enthalpy of fusion (ΔHm) value was decreased for the composite samples compared to neat PHBV, indicating a decrease in the degree of crystallinity. Lowest ΔHm value was obtained for the P/ZnO(U) sample.

DSC thermograms of PHBV and PHBV/ZnO composites: (a) first heating, (b) cooling, and (c) second heating curves.
Thermal properties of PHBV samples obtained from DSC analysis.
| Sample code | 1st heating scan |
Cooling scan |
2nd heating scan |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T m1°C) | T m2(°C) | ΔH m (J/g) | T c(°C) | ΔH c (J/g) | T m(°C) | ΔH m (J/g) | X c (%) | |
| PHBV | 173.7 | 181.0 | 111.3 | 120.9 | −107.2 | 174.7 | 112.7 | 77.2 |
| PHBV/ZnO(S) | 173.9 | 180.8 | 102.9 | 121.1 | −99.2 | 174.3 | 104.5 | 72.3 |
| PHBV/ZnO(S-U) | 174.0 | 180.8 | 107.9 | 120.6 | −97.6 | 174.9 | 100.8 | 69.7 |
| PHBV/ZnO(U) | 174.1 | 181.1 | 101.0 | 120.6 | −93.3 | 174.9 | 99.0 | 68.5 |
Double-melting peak behavior was not observed during the second heating scan (Fig. 5c). This indicated that processing conditions during the composites fabrication promoted melting-recrystallization-remelting mechanism, whereas controlled crystallization during the cooling scan hindered this behavior. Tm value did not change with the addition of ZnO particles and was around 175°C for all samples. However, ΔHm value decreased by the addition of ZnO, implying a decrease in crystallinity. Lowest Xc value was obtained for the P/ZnO(U) composite. Similarly, Tc values were not changed with the addition of ZnO particles, but ΔHc values were decreased, during the cooling scan (Fig. 5b). PHBV is a semi-crystalline polymer with considerably high crystallinity, resulting in impaired mechanical properties such as brittleness. Therefore, the decrease in Xc value can be important for improvement of mechanical properties of the polymer.
Hydroxyapatite particles had shown a decreasing effect on crystallinity of PHBV, in a previous study of the authors [7], explained by formation of attractive non-covalent interactions that inhibit crystallinity by constraining polymer molecules. In another study related to the influence of ZnO nanoparticles on electrospun PHBV nanofibers [21], ZnO particles were reported to disturb the mobility of PHBV chains, by formation of hydrogen bonds between the particles and PHBV, resulting a decrease in crystallinity. Xiang et al. [22] also reported that formation of hydrogen bonding induced decrease in crystallinity in tannic acid reinforced PHBV films.
Thermal degradation of PHBV and its composites were analyzed by TGA. Thermal degradation of PHBV proceeds via random chain scission, resulting in a gradual reduction in molecular weight [23]. The PHBV and composite samples fabricated in this study, exhibited a similar degradation mechanism; one-step weight loss around 300 ˚C. On the other hand, decomposition peak temperature (Tmax) was slightly decreased for PHBV/ZnO composites in comparison with neat PHBV (Table 3). The composites exhibited similar Tmax values, and they were about 7–9°C lower than that of neat PHBV. Slight decreases were also observed for the temperatures corresponding to 2% (Td,2) and 10% of weight loss (Td,10) for PHBV/ZnO composites. Fortunately, Td,2 values were considerably above the Tm values, and the processing window of the polymer was not significantly narrowed.
Thermal degradation temperatures of PHBV and PHBV/ZnO composites.
| Sample code | T d,2(°C) | T d,10(°C) | T max(°C) | (Tmax–Tm)(°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHBV | 263.9 | 273.2 | 284.5 | 109.8 |
| PHBV/ZnO(S) | 256.5 | 266.9 | 276.3 | 102.0 |
| PHBV/ZnO(S-U) | 255.9 | 265.9 | 275.2 | 100.3 |
| PHBV/ZnO(U) | 258.6 | 267.4 | 277.1 | 102.2 |
In a previous study [24], ZnO particles incorporated in PHBV by solution casting method were reported to increase thermal degradation temperatures. This behavior was explained by the creation of a barrier by ZnO particles against the transport of decomposition products from the bulk to the gas phase. Processing conditions can strongly affect the distribution, orientation, and location of the particles within the polymer matrix; resulting in diverse composite properties [24]. High thermal conductivity of ZnO particles might have also contributed to thermal degradation. Previously, increased thermal conductivity due to the addition of cellulose nanowhiskers [25] and graphene [26], [27] were reported to promote the decrease in thermal degradation temperature of polymers.
Mechanical properties of PHBV and PHBV/ZnO composite samples were evaluated by tensile testing. Mechanical properties of polymer composites are known to be strongly related to degree of filler dispersion, interfacial characteristics, and crystallinity. In general, ZnO particles affected tensile strength of PHBV positively, (Fig. 6a). For the composites fabricated with ultrasound-dispersed particles, this effect was more profound due to better particle dispersion within the matrix. Young’s modulus did not change significantly, suggesting ZnO particles were effective on strength of the polymer rather than its stiffness. Ultrasound-dispersed ZnO particles increased elongation at break and toughness values of PHBV significantly, and the increase was higher for silane-treated particles (Fig. 6b). Decrease in crystallinity is known to cause an increase in ductility, and the tensile results obtained were consistent with the DSC analysis findings. Nevertheless, ductility is also related to the shear stress at the particle-polymer interface, which could be affected positively with silane-treatment due to stronger adhesion. Better particle distribution due to ultrasound application might have also affected ductility positively.

Tensile properties of PHBV and PHBV/ZnO composites: (a) tensile strength and Young’s modulus, and (b) toughness and elongation at break.
Conclusion
ZnO particles were synthesized from aqueous solution, forming rod-arrays by self-aggregation. Silane treatment and ultrasonic dispersion was applied aiming particle deagglomeration. Complete deagglomeration could only be achieved for untreated particles by 60 min of ultrasound application. Incorporation of silane-treated and/or ultrasound-dispersed particles into PHBV matrix did not affect the main crystal structure of PHBV, but decreased the degree of crystallinity. This effect was more pronounced for ultrasound-applied particles, compared to the particles only silane-treatment was applied. Thermal degradation temperature of PHBV slightly decreased with ZnO addition. When surface modification and ultrasound dispersion were applied together, strength and ductility of PHBV could be enhanced significantly while maintaining stiffness of the polymer. Surface treatment, particle dispersion by ultrasound or other methods, and effectiveness of melt compounding method are all important factors in achieving fine particle distribution within polymer matrices, thus in enhancement of polymer properties.
Article note
A collection of invited papers based on presentations at the 16th International Conference on Polymers and Organic Chemistry (POC-16), Hersonissos (near Heraklion), Crete, Greece, 13–16 June 2016.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Yildiz Technical University Scientific Research Projects Coordinatorship for financial support on Project no. 2015-07-01-DOP03.
References
[1] V. Siracusa, P. Rocculi, S. Romani, M. D. Rosa. Trends Food Sci. Tech.19, 634 (2008).10.1016/j.tifs.2008.07.003Search in Google Scholar
[2] S. Philip, T. Keshavarz, I. Roy. J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 82, 233 (2007).10.1002/jctb.1667Search in Google Scholar
[3] J. W. Rhim, H. M. Park, C. S. Ha. Prog. Polym. Sci. 38, 1629 (2013).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.008Search in Google Scholar
[4] R. Pantani, G. Gorrasi, G. Vigliotta, M. Murariu, P. Dubois. Eur. Polym. J.49, 3471 (2013).10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.08.005Search in Google Scholar
[5] K. Elen, M. Murariu, R. Peeters, P. Dubois, J. Mullens, A. Hardy, M. K. Van Bael. Polym. Advan. Technol.23, 1422 (2012).10.1002/pat.2062Search in Google Scholar
[6] T. Silverman, M. Naffakh, C. Marco, G. Ellis. Mater. Chem. Phys.170, 145 (2016).10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.12.032Search in Google Scholar
[7] M. Oner, B. Ilhan. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 65, 19 (2016).Search in Google Scholar
[8] J. P. Reddy, M. Misra, A. Mohanty. Pure Appl. Chem. 85, 521 (2013).10.1351/PAC-CON-12-04-05Search in Google Scholar
[9] L. Martino, M. A. Berthet, H. A. Coussy, N. Gontard. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 132, 41611 (2015).10.1002/app.41611Search in Google Scholar
[10] A. Javadi, Y. Srithep, S. Pilla, J. Lee, S. Gong, L. S. Turng. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 30, 749 (2010).10.1016/j.msec.2010.03.008Search in Google Scholar
[11] S. Kango, S. Kalia, A. Celli, J. Njuguna, Y. Habibi, R. Kumar. Prog. Polym. Sci. 38, 1232 (2013).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.02.003Search in Google Scholar
[12] S. J. Chung, J. P. Leonard, I. Nettleship, J. K. Lee, Y. Soong, D. V. Martello, M. K. Chyu. Powder Technol. 194, 75 (2009).10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.025Search in Google Scholar
[13] J. E. Graves, M. Sugden, R. E. Litchfield, D. A. Hutt, T. J. Mason, A. J. Cobley. Ultrason. Sonochem. 29, 428 (2016).10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.10.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[14] N. Mandzy, E. Grulke, T. Druffel. Powder Technol. 160, 121 (2005).10.1016/j.powtec.2005.08.020Search in Google Scholar
[15] B. Akin, M. Oner. Res. Chem. Intermed. 38, 1511 (2012).10.1007/s11164-011-0481-xSearch in Google Scholar
[16] P. J. Barham, A. Keller, E. L. Otun. J. Mater. Sci. 19, 2781 (1984).10.1007/BF01026954Search in Google Scholar
[17] S. S. Guzman, B. R. Jayan, E. Rosa, A. T. Castro, V. G. Gonzalez, M. J. Yacaman. Mater. Chem. Phys. 115, 172 (2009).10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.11.030Search in Google Scholar
[18] Y. Zhang, F. Fang, C. Wang, L. Wang, X. Wang, X. Chu, J. Li, X. Fang, Z. Wei, X. Wang. Polym. Composite. 35, 1204 (2014).10.1002/pc.22769Search in Google Scholar
[19] J. Coates. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, R. A. Meyers (Ed.), pp. 1–23. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., USA (2006).Search in Google Scholar
[20] L. M. W. K. Gunaratne, R. A. Shanks. Eur. Polym. J.41, 2980 (2005).10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.06.015Search in Google Scholar
[21] W. Yu, C. H. Lan, S. J. Wang, P. F. Fang, Y. M. Sun. Polymer. 51, 2403 (2010).10.1016/j.polymer.2010.03.024Search in Google Scholar
[22] H. Xiang, L. Li, S. Wang, R. Wang, Y. Cheng, Z. Zhou, M. Zhu. Polym. Composite. 36, 2303 (2015).10.1002/pc.23143Search in Google Scholar
[23] H. Xiang, X. Wen, X. Miu, Y. Li, Z. Zhou, M. Zhu. Prog. Nat. Sci. 26, 58 (2016).10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.01.007Search in Google Scholar
[24] A. M. D. Pascual, A. L. D. Vicente. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 6, 9822 (2014).10.1021/am502261eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] E. Ten, J. Turtle, D. Bahr, L. Jiang, M. Wolcott. Polymer. 51, 2652 (2010).10.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.007Search in Google Scholar
[26] J. A. Martin, G. Gorrasi, A. L. Rubio, M. J. Fabra, L. C. Mas, M. A. L. Manchado, J. M. Lagaron. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 132, 42101 (2015).Search in Google Scholar
[27] C. Bao, L. Song, C. A. Wilkie, B. Yuan, Y. Guo, Y. Hu, X. Gong. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 16399 (2012).10.1039/c2jm32500dSearch in Google Scholar
©2016 IUPAC & De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For more information, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Editorial
- The 2016 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
- Conference papers
- Cyclotriphosphazene, an old compound applied to the synthesis of smart dendrimers with tailored properties
- Milestones in microwave-assisted organophosphorus chemistry
- Synthetic routes to polyphosphoesters as solid polymer electrolytes for lithium ion batteries
- Soluble polymer supports for homogeneous catalysis in flow reactions
- Box-Behnken experimental design for the production of precipitated calcium carbonate
- Synthesis and characterisation of lignin-like oligomers as a bio-inspired consolidant for waterlogged archaeological wood
- Synthesis, characterizations and Pb(II) sorption properties of cobalt phosphonate materials
- Performance of poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) functionalized with different aminophosphonate pendant groups, in the removal of phenolic compounds from aqueous solutions
- Synthesis of new dithia[3.3]parapara- and metapara-cyclophane based tectons: toward an universal surface-confined 2D/3D molecular binding motif
- Effects of surface modification and ultrasonic agitation on the properties of PHBV/ZnO nanocomposites
- Modified macromolecules in the prevention of silica scale
- Ionizing radiation: a versatile tool for nanostructuring of polymers
- Non-classical effects in proton or hydrogen transfer
- IUPAC Recommendations
- Source-based nomenclature for single-strand homopolymers and copolymers (IUPAC Recommendations 2016)
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Editorial
- The 2016 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
- Conference papers
- Cyclotriphosphazene, an old compound applied to the synthesis of smart dendrimers with tailored properties
- Milestones in microwave-assisted organophosphorus chemistry
- Synthetic routes to polyphosphoesters as solid polymer electrolytes for lithium ion batteries
- Soluble polymer supports for homogeneous catalysis in flow reactions
- Box-Behnken experimental design for the production of precipitated calcium carbonate
- Synthesis and characterisation of lignin-like oligomers as a bio-inspired consolidant for waterlogged archaeological wood
- Synthesis, characterizations and Pb(II) sorption properties of cobalt phosphonate materials
- Performance of poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) functionalized with different aminophosphonate pendant groups, in the removal of phenolic compounds from aqueous solutions
- Synthesis of new dithia[3.3]parapara- and metapara-cyclophane based tectons: toward an universal surface-confined 2D/3D molecular binding motif
- Effects of surface modification and ultrasonic agitation on the properties of PHBV/ZnO nanocomposites
- Modified macromolecules in the prevention of silica scale
- Ionizing radiation: a versatile tool for nanostructuring of polymers
- Non-classical effects in proton or hydrogen transfer
- IUPAC Recommendations
- Source-based nomenclature for single-strand homopolymers and copolymers (IUPAC Recommendations 2016)