Abstract
This study explores Indian library and information science (LIS) professionals’ perspectives on the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic libraries in India. It aims to evaluate their comprehension of AI, determine their perspectives, investigate AI utilization, assess advantages, identify influencing factors, and examine attitudes towards AI adoption. A quantitative research approach was employed, utilizing a structured questionnaire designed based on study objectives and reviewed by subject matter experts. Purposive sampling targeted individuals with relevant LIS knowledge. Data were collected through Google Forms from 259 respondents and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Respondents generally exhibited positive perceptions towards AI integration in libraries. High mean scores were observed for statements such as “AI can bridge librarian performance gaps” and “AI does not make library staff lazy.” Librarians expressed willingness to learn about AI, interest in its ethical implications, and confidence in its potential to improve library services. The study highlights a cautious optimism towards AI adoption in Indian academic libraries, with recognition of its potential benefits tempered by concerns about employment and resource allocation. Librarians demonstrate proactive attitudes towards engaging with AI technology and understanding its implications for library services, indicating a readiness to embrace AI within the profession.
1 Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) has pervaded contemporary society, transforming various aspects of our daily lives and reshaping interactions with technology. Its impact is evident in tailored recommendations on streaming platforms and sophisticated algorithms guiding autonomous vehicles. Libraries, as guardians of knowledge, are embracing this transformative wave, exploring AI’s potential to revolutionize services and enhance user experiences. Mishra and Sarvaiya (2024) and Sallu, Raehang, and Qammaddin (2024) highlight AI’s benefits in education and operational efficiency, stressing the need for training and ethical guidelines. Indian library and information science (LIS) professionals recognize AI’s capacity to enhance data analysis and information accessibility but grapple with its complexities and ethical dilemmas (Ledro, Nosella, & Vinelli, 2022; Liang, Hwang, Chen, & Darmawansah, 2023).
As educational institutions prioritize AI education for future librarians, library education is evolving to equip professionals with AI skills and ethical awareness. This proactive approach ensures libraries remain adaptable in a rapidly advancing technological landscape. This article explores Indian LIS professionals’ perspectives on AI integration in library services through a quantitative research approach, aiming to assess awareness of AI tools, perceptions, understanding of AI-powered services, competence, and attitudes towards AI adoption in libraries.
Objectives of the Study
To evaluate Indian LIS professionals’ comprehension of AI.
To determine perspectives on AI among Indian LIS professionals.
To investigate AI-based service utilization in Indian libraries.
To assess the advantages brought by AI integration in Indian library systems.
To identify factors influencing AI adoption in Indian libraries.
To examine attitudes towards AI adoption among Indian LIS professionals.
2 Literature Review
2.1 Introduction to AI in Libraries
AI has emerged as a transformative technology across various sectors, including libraries. The application of AI in libraries represents a significant evolution from traditional methods of managing and disseminating information to more dynamic and interactive processes. Libraries have historically been early adopters of technology, striving to enhance their services and reach a broader audience. The integration of AI into library systems promises to further this mission by offering personalized user experiences, automating repetitive tasks, and enhancing the accessibility and organization of vast amounts of information (Cox, Pinfield, & Rutter, 2018; Gill et al., 2022; Okunlaya, Syed Abdullah, & Alias, 2022; Rubin, Chen, & Thorimbert, 2010).
AI technologies can analyse vast datasets at unprecedented speeds, identifying patterns and insights that would be impossible for humans to discern unaided (Bhuiyan, Ahmed, & Jahan, 2024; Lund & Wang, 2023; Senathirajah et al., 2024). This capability is particularly beneficial in libraries, where managing extensive collections of books, journals, multimedia, and digital content is a complex task. AI can streamline cataloguing processes, improve search functionalities, and even predict user needs based on past interactions. These advancements help create a more intuitive and efficient system that aligns with the evolving expectations of library patrons (Adewojo & Dunmade, 2024; Jayavadivel et al., 2024; Lu, 2024; Nardi & O’day, 1996).
Globally, libraries are experimenting with various AI applications to create smarter, more responsive systems. For instance, AI can facilitate more effective information retrieval through natural language processing (NLP), allowing users to search for information using conversational queries rather than keyword-based searches. This not only improves user satisfaction but also makes information more accessible to those who may not be familiar with specific terminology. Moreover, AI’s ability to learn and adapt over time means that library systems can continuously improve, providing ever-more accurate and relevant results to users (Ali, Naeem, & Bhatti, 2020; Collins, Dennehy, Conboy, & Mikalef, 2021; Noh, 2015; Taskin & Al, 2019).
2.2 AI Applications in Library Services
The application of AI in library services is vast and continually expanding, with numerous practical implementations enhancing both the user experience and operational efficiency. One prominent example is the use of chatbots. These AI-driven assistants provide 24/7 support to library users, answering common queries, guiding users through resource databases, and offering assistance with basic library services (Jha, 2023; Li & Coates, 2024; Panda & Chakravarty, 2022). Chatbots can handle a variety of tasks simultaneously, reducing the workload on library staff and ensuring that patrons receive timely and accurate information (Ehrenpreis & DeLooper, 2022; Hamad, Al-Fadel, & Fakhouri, 2023).
Another significant application is AI-powered recommendation systems. These systems analyse user data, including borrowing history and search patterns, to suggest books, articles, and other resources that match users’ interests. This personalized approach not only improves user engagement but also helps users discover new materials that they might not have found otherwise (Devika & Milton, 2024; Priya & Ramya, 2024). Automated cataloguing and metadata generation are also crucial AI applications in libraries (Brzustowicz, 2023; Greenberg, Spurgin, & Crystal, 2006; Hechler, Weihrauch, & Wu, 2023). Traditional cataloguing processes are labour-intensive and time-consuming (Chandrakar & Arora, 2010). AI can streamline these processes by automatically generating metadata for new acquisitions, ensuring that resources are correctly classified and easily retrievable. This automation not only saves time but also reduces the potential for human error, leading to more accurate and comprehensive library catalogues.
Digital preservation is another area where AI plays a pivotal role. Libraries around the world house vast collections of historical documents, manuscripts, and other materials that require careful preservation. AI technologies can assist in the digital restoration and preservation of these materials, using image recognition and processing algorithms to repair and enhance damaged texts and images. This ensures that valuable historical records are preserved for future generations.
In Asia, libraries are leveraging AI to overcome specific regional challenges, such as language barriers. AI-driven translation and language processing tools help libraries provide access to resources in multiple languages, making information more accessible to diverse user bases. This application is particularly significant in multilingual countries like India, where providing services in various local languages can be challenging.
2.3 Perceptions and Attitudes Towards AI in Libraries
The successful implementation of AI in libraries is heavily influenced by the perceptions and attitudes of library professionals. Understanding these perceptions is crucial for developing strategies that encourage the adoption of AI technologies. Research indicates a spectrum of attitudes among librarians, ranging from enthusiastic acceptance to cautious scepticism (Huang, 2022; Kashive, Powale, & Kashive, 2020; Mckie & Narayan, 2019).
Many librarians view AI as a powerful tool that can revolutionize library services. They recognize the potential for AI to automate routine tasks, freeing up time for more complex and creative activities. For example, AI can handle repetitive cataloguing duties, allowing librarians to focus on curating unique collections, conducting research, and engaging with the community. Additionally, AI’s ability to provide personalized recommendations and enhance search capabilities is seen as a significant improvement in user services (Hamad et al., 2023; Lund, Omame, Tijani, & Agbaji, 2020; Wang, 2017; Wood & Evans, 2018).
However, there is also apprehension about the integration of AI in libraries. One of the primary concerns is job displacement. Librarians worry that the automation of tasks traditionally performed by humans could lead to job losses. This fear is compounded by the rapid pace of technological advancement, which can make it challenging for professionals to keep up with new developments and acquire the necessary skills (Huang, 2022; Okunlaya et al., 2022; Shen & Zhang, 2024; Subaveerapandiyan & Gozali, 2024). Addressing these concerns requires transparent communication about the role of AI as a complementary tool rather than a replacement for human labour.
Ethical considerations also play a significant role in shaping attitudes towards AI. Librarians are often wary of the implications of AI on data privacy and security. The use of AI involves the collection and analysis of large amounts of data, raising concerns about how this data is used and protected. Ensuring that AI systems are designed and implemented with robust privacy safeguards is essential for gaining the trust of library professionals and users alike (Adigun, Ajani, & Enakrire, 2024; Lund & Wang, 2023; Panda & Chakravarty, 2022).
Research by Mishra and Sarvaiya (2024) and others emphasizes the importance of on-going education and ethical training for librarians. Providing opportunities for professional development and creating platforms for librarians to share their experiences and concerns can help mitigate resistance to AI. Furthermore, involving librarians in the development and implementation of AI systems can ensure that these technologies are tailored to meet the specific needs and values of the library community.
2.4 Challenges and Barriers to AI Integration
The integration of AI in libraries, while promising, is not without its challenges. Several barriers hinder the widespread adoption of AI technologies in library settings, including financial constraints, technical expertise gaps, and ethical concerns.
One of the most significant challenges is the financial investment required to implement AI technologies. Developing and maintaining AI systems can be expensive, and many libraries, particularly those in developing regions, struggle with limited budgets (Harisanty, Anna, Putri, Firdaus, & Noor Azizi, 2022; Subaveerapandiyan & Gozali, 2024). The cost of acquiring AI software, hardware, and the necessary infrastructure can be prohibitive. Additionally, on-going maintenance and updates are essential to keep AI systems functioning effectively, adding to the financial burden. Securing funding for AI initiatives often requires libraries to seek external grants, partnerships, and innovative funding models (Ali et al., 2020; Barsha & Munshi, 2023; Kaushal & Yadav, 2022).
Another critical barrier is the skills gap among library staff. Implementing and managing AI technologies requires specialized technical knowledge that many librarians currently lack. This skills gap necessitates substantial investment in training and professional development to equip library staff with the necessary competencies. Workshops, courses, and certifications focused on AI and related technologies can help bridge this gap, but these initiatives also require time and financial resources (Ayinde & Kirkwood, 2020; Cox et al., 2018; Diseiye, Ukubeyinje, Oladokun, & Kakwagh, 2024).
Ethical issues further complicate the integration of AI in libraries. Concerns about data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the transparency of AI decision-making processes are paramount. Libraries handle sensitive user data, and ensuring that AI systems comply with data protection regulations is crucial. Algorithmic bias is another concern, as AI systems trained on biased datasets can perpetuate and even exacerbate existing inequalities. Ensuring transparency in AI decision-making processes is essential to maintain user trust and uphold the ethical standards of library services (Hodonu-Wusu, 2024; Rajkumar et al., 2024).
Studies by Liang et al. (2023) and Ledro et al. (2022) provide insights into these challenges and suggest strategies for overcoming them. One approach is to develop clear ethical guidelines for the use of AI in libraries, addressing issues of data privacy, bias, and transparency. Collaborating with technology providers to design AI systems that align with these ethical standards is also crucial. Furthermore, fostering partnerships with academic institutions and other libraries can facilitate knowledge-sharing and collaborative problem-solving.
2.5 AI in Indian Libraries: Current State and Future Prospects
In India, the adoption of AI in libraries is still in its early stages, but there are promising developments that signal a bright future for AI-driven library services (Chatterjee & Bhattacharjee, 2020; Dwivedi et al., 2021). Indian libraries face unique challenges, including limited funding, infrastructural constraints, and the need for solutions tailored to diverse linguistic and cultural contexts (Subaveerapandiyan & Gozali, 2024).
The current state of AI in Indian libraries is characterized by experimental implementations and pilot projects. For instance, some academic libraries have begun using AI-powered recommendation systems to enhance the research experience for students and faculty. These systems analyse user behaviour and preferences to suggest relevant resources, making the research process more efficient and personalized. Additionally, AI-driven chatbots are being introduced to provide round-the-clock assistance to library users, helping them navigate databases and find information quickly (Kaushal & Yadav, 2022; Khan, Gupta, Sinhababu, & Chakravarty, 2023; Lappalainen & Narayanan, 2023).
Despite these advancements, the widespread adoption of AI in Indian libraries is hindered by several challenges. Limited funding is a significant barrier, as many libraries operate on tight budgets and cannot afford the high costs associated with AI technologies. This financial constraint necessitates innovative funding strategies, such as seeking grants from governmental and non-governmental organizations or forming partnerships with tech companies and academic institutions. Collaborative efforts can help pool resources and share the financial burden, making AI technologies more accessible to Indian libraries (Balasubramanian & Tamilselvan, 2023; Ram, 2024; Verma & Gupta, 2022).
2.6 Ethical and Professional Considerations
The ethical use of AI in libraries is a critical area of concern, requiring careful consideration of issues such as data privacy, transparency in AI decision-making, and ensuring fairness in AI algorithms. Librarians play a vital role in managing these ethical issues, necessitating adequate training and guidelines to navigate the complexities of AI technologies (Morley et al., 2023; Ng, Leung, Chu, & Qiao, 2021; Stahl, 2021).
Data privacy is one of the foremost ethical considerations when implementing AI in libraries. AI systems often rely on large datasets, which can include sensitive user information. Ensuring the confidentiality and security of these data is paramount (Ali et al., 2020; Gasparini & Kautonen, 2022). Libraries must adopt robust data protection measures, complying with legal and regulatory standards such as the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe (Banciu & Mantykangas, 2018; Marc, 2018). Transparency in AI decision-making processes is another crucial ethical consideration (Bradley, 2022; Lowagie, 2023). Libraries should prioritize the use of explainable AI (XAI) techniques, which aim to make AI decision-making processes more interpretable and understandable. Providing users with explanations for AI-generated recommendations and decisions can enhance transparency and accountability.
Professional development and ethical training for librarians are critical for managing AI technologies responsibly. Librarians need to be equipped with the knowledge and skills to understand the ethical implications of AI and make informed decisions about its use. Continuous education programs, workshops, and certifications focused on AI ethics can provide librarians with the necessary competencies (Ghosh & McCoy, 2024; Martzoukou, 2020; Nguyen, Ngo, Hong, Dang, & Nguyen, 2023). Additionally, creating platforms for librarians to share their experiences and discuss ethical challenges can foster a community of practice that promotes ethical AI usage.
3 Research Methodology
This study employs a quantitative research approach to examine the viewpoints of Indian LIS professionals concerning the incorporation of AI in library services. The methodology consists of three primary phases: survey design, data collection, and data analysis.
3.1 Sampling Technique and Sample Size Determination
Purposive sampling was employed in this study to target specific individuals with relevant knowledge and experience in LIS within India. The selected population comprised college and university librarians across India, who are actively engaged in library services and likely to provide valuable insights into AI integration in academic libraries. This sampling strategy was chosen for its effectiveness in obtaining rich and detailed information from a specialized group.
A total of 300 emails were distributed, resulting in 259 responses, indicating a response rate of 86.3%. Data collection took place from 1 to 29 February 2024. This high response rate suggests a strong interest and engagement among the targeted respondents.
3.2 Survey Design and Questionnaire Development
A structured questionnaire was developed based on the study objectives and reviewed by subject matter experts in LIS and AI. The questionnaire comprised three sections: demographic information, perceived benefits of AI implementation in library services, and awareness of AI applications among LIS professionals. The questionnaire items were designed using a 5-point Likert scale to gauge respondents’ perceptions.
The development of the questionnaire followed a systematic approach, starting with the creation of an initial item pool derived from the study objectives. This item pool underwent a thorough review by experts in LIS and AI to ensure content validity and relevance. Subsequent revisions were made based on the feedback received, followed by pilot testing with a small sample of respondents to evaluate the clarity, comprehensibility, and appropriateness of the questionnaire items. Feedback from the pilot study was carefully considered, leading to further refinements to enhance the questionnaire’s validity and reliability.
To ensure a comprehensive understanding, the questionnaire was divided into the following sections:
Demographic Information: Collected data on the respondents’ age, gender, educational qualifications, and years of experience in LIS.
Perceived Benefits of AI: Assessed the perceived advantages of integrating AI in library services, such as improved efficiency, enhanced user experience, and data management capabilities.
Awareness and Use of AI Applications: Evaluated the respondents’ familiarity with various AI applications and their current usage in library operations.
3.3 Data Collection
The survey was conducted using Google Forms, with the survey link distributed through personal email IDs of LIS professionals. The use of an online survey platform facilitated efficient data collection and management. Reminders were sent to non-respondents to maximize the response rate.
3.4 Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations were calculated to analyse the demographic profile of respondents and their perceptions of AI in library services. Inferential statistics, including mean and standard deviation, were used to assess significant differences in respondents’ perceptions based on demographic variables. The statistical analysis was conducted using software packages such as SPSS 29.
4 Results
The demographic profile of Indian LIS professionals, detailed in Table 1, reveals key insights into the composition of respondents. The majority of participants were male (59.5%) compared to female (40.5%), indicating a gender disparity within the field. Experience-wise, a significant portion of respondents had over 15 years of experience (51%), while 26.3% had 10–15 years. Educationally, the majority held either a PhD (48.6%) or a Post Graduate degree (37.1%) in LIS, underscoring a highly educated cohort. In terms of current positions, College Librarians represented the largest group (68.3%), followed by University Librarians (5.4%) and Assistant Librarians (8.1%). This distribution suggests a concentration of senior roles and highlights the diverse professional backgrounds contributing to the study’s findings.
Demographic profile of Indian library and information science professionals
| Demographic details | Item | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 154 | 59.5 |
| Female | 105 | 40.5 | |
| Year of experience | 0–2 | 18 | 6.9 |
| 2–5 | 9 | 3.5 | |
| 5–10 | 32 | 12.3 | |
| 10–15 | 68 | 26.3 | |
| More than 15 | 132 | 51 | |
| The current highest level of study in LIS | Certificate course | 3 | 1.2 |
| Under graduate | 4 | 1.5 | |
| Post graduate | 96 | 37.1 | |
| M.Phil | 27 | 10.4 | |
| PhD | 126 | 48.6 | |
| Post doctoral | 3 | 1.2 | |
| Current Position | University librarian | 14 | 5.4 |
| Dy. librarian | 8 | 3.1 | |
| Assistant librarian | 21 | 8.1 | |
| College librarian | 177 | 68.3 | |
| Information scientist | 0 | 0 | |
| Sr. Library assistant | 7 | 2.7 | |
| Library assistant | 6 | 2.3 | |
| Other | 26 | 10 |
Table 2 shows varying levels of awareness among LIS professionals regarding different AI tools. Notably, ChatGPT garnered the highest awareness with 90.3% of respondents indicating familiarity, while Khanmigo had the lowest awareness at 8.7%. Grammarly and Wisdolia also had high awareness levels at 84.6 and 84.9%, respectively. Conversely, tools like Khanmigo (8.7%) and NOLEJ (17.8%) were less recognized.
Awareness of AI tools among LIS professionals
| AI Tools | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| ChatPDF | 191 (73.8%) | 68 (26.2%) |
| Curipod | 60 (23.2%) | 199 (76.8%) |
| Grammarly | 219 (84.6%) | 40 (15.4%) |
| Khanmigo | 59 (8.7%) | 200 (91.3%) |
| LessonPlans.ai | 78 (30.1%) | 181 (69.9%) |
| MusicLM | 74 (28.6%) | 185 (71.4%) |
| NOLEJ | 46 (17.8%) | 213 (82.2%) |
| QuestionWell | 107 (41.3%) | 152 (58.7%) |
| Stable Diffusion | 45 (17.4%) | 214 (82.6%) |
| Winston | 61 (23.6%) | 198 (76.4%) |
| Wisdolia | 39 (15.1%) | 220 (84.9%) |
| ChatGPT | 234 (90.3%) | 25 (9.7%) |
The results indicate a spectrum of awareness among LIS professionals regarding AI tools, with some tools widely recognized and others less so, suggesting opportunities for further education and integration of AI technologies in library settings (Table 3).
AI-powered library services provided by LIS professionals
| AI-powered library services | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| A guide robot for library users | 61 (23.6%) | 198 (76.4%) |
| Accessibility services for patrons with disabilities | 108 (41.7%) | 151 (58.3%) |
| Automating cataloguing and classification | 150 (57.9%) | 109 (42.1%) |
| Chatbots | 100 (38.6%) | 159 (61.4%) |
| Digital preservation | 157 (60.6%) | 102 (39.4%) |
| Intelligent data analysis for collection management | 103 (39.8%) | 156 (60.2%) |
| Language translation services | 129 (49.8%) | 130 (50.2%) |
| Metadata tagging and classification | 108 (41.7%) | 151 (58.3%) |
| QR and barcode | 223 (86.1%) | 36 (13.9%) |
| RFID system | 83 (32.1%) | 176 (67.9%) |
| Text and data mining | 110 (42.5%) | 149 (57.5%) |
| Text-to-speech and speech-to-text | 127 (49%) | 132 (51%) |
| Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) | 77 (29.7%) | 182 (70.3%) |
| Virtual reference services | 145 (56%) | 114 (44%) |
The table illustrates the adoption of various AI-powered services in library environments. QR and barcode technologies exhibit the highest adoption rate at 86.1%, indicating widespread implementation for library operations. Other commonly adopted services include automating cataloguing and classification (57.9%), digital preservation (60.6%), and metadata tagging and classification (41.7%).
Conversely, services like a guide robot for library users (23.6%) and VR and AR (29.7%) show lower adoption rates, suggesting potential areas for future growth and exploration in enhancing user experiences through emerging technologies.
The data highlight a diverse landscape of AI applications in libraries, with varying levels of adoption across different services, reflecting the evolving integration of AI to improve efficiency and service delivery in library settings.
Table 4 indicates a generally positive perception and level of competence among LIS professionals regarding AI applications in libraries. A significant majority believe they are able to communicate AI’s benefits and risks to library users (74.9%) and are aware of AI’s use in personalizing library recommendations (77.2%). Moreover, a large proportion believe AI can enhance library resource accessibility (84.9%) and are excited about its potential to revolutionize library services (79.5%).
Perceptions and competence in AI applications for library advancement
| Perceptions and Competence in AI | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Able to communicate AI’s benefits and risks to library users | 194 (74.9%) | 65 (25.1%) |
| Aware of AI’s use in personalizing library recommendations | 200 (77.2%) | 59 (22.8%) |
| Believe AI can enhance library resource accessibility | 220 (84.9%) | 39 (15.1%) |
| Can recognize the ethical implications of AI in libraries | 182 (70.3%) | 77 (29.7%) |
| Capable of assessing the accuracy and reliability of AI tools | 166 (64.1%) | 93 (35.9%) |
| Comfortable using AI tools in my work | 199 (76.8%) | 60 (23.2%) |
| Excited about AI’s potential to revolutionize library services | 206 (79.5%) | 53 (20.5%) |
| Familiar with AI’s potential for chatbots and virtual assistants | 167 (64.5%) | 92 (35.5%) |
| Familiar with AI’s role in cataloguing and classification tasks | 164 (63.3%) | 95 (36.7%) |
| Knowledgeable about AI’s role in automating user engagement analysis for better insights | 181 (69.9%) | 78 (30.1%) |
However, there are areas where competence could be further developed. For instance, fewer respondents feel capable of assessing the accuracy and reliability of AI tools (64.1%) or are familiar with AI’s role in automating user engagement analysis (69.9%). Additionally, ethical implications of AI in libraries are recognized by 70.3% of respondents, indicating awareness but also room for deeper understanding and application.
The data suggest a readiness among LIS professionals to embrace AI technologies while highlighting opportunities for enhancing skills and knowledge to maximize AI’s potential in library services.
Table 5 provides insights into the perceptions of AI among LIS professionals, highlighting both optimism and concerns within the community. The data show that AI is generally perceived positively in terms of its potential to address performance gaps among librarians, as indicated by a mean score of 3.94. This suggests a widespread belief that AI can enhance operational efficiency and service delivery in libraries.
Perception of AI among LIS professionals
| Perception of AI among LIS professionals | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|
| AI has the potential to address performance gaps among librarians | 3.94 | 0.96 |
| AI does not lead to laziness among library staff | 3.69 | 0.96 |
| There is a perception that AI threatens librarians’ job security | 3.39 | 1.04 |
| AI robots could help alleviate shortages of librarians | 3.15 | 1.08 |
| AI robots may collaborate with librarians in the future | 3.71 | 0.97 |
| Budget constraints pose challenges to the adoption of AI in libraries | 3.89 | 0.94 |
| The high energy consumption of AI technology hinders its adoption in libraries | 3.57 | 0.98 |
| A lack of skills and knowledge among LIS professionals hinders AI adoption in libraries | 3.76 | 1 |
| AI robots could potentially perform librarian roles more effectively | 3.72 | 1.06 |
| A shortage of vendors specializing in AI is a barrier to its adoption in libraries | 3.59 | 0.99 |
The scale used: 1 = Strongly agree; 2 = Agree; 3 = Neutral; 4 = Disagree, and 5 = Strongly disagree.
However, concerns about AI’s impact on job security are notable, with a mean score of 3.39, reflecting apprehension about potential automation replacing traditional librarian roles. This sentiment is balanced by a moderate belief (mean = 3.15) that AI could help alleviate shortages of librarians, indicating cautious optimism about its role in addressing staffing challenges rather than outright job displacement.
Professionals also express optimism about future collaborations between AI robots and librarians (mean = 3.71), highlighting a readiness to integrate AI into library services as collaborative tools rather than standalone replacements. Challenges such as budget constraints (mean = 3.89), high energy consumption (mean = 3.57), and a perceived lack of skills and knowledge (mean = 3.76) among LIS professionals pose significant barriers to AI adoption in libraries, though there remains confidence (mean = 3.72) in AI’s potential to effectively perform librarian roles. LIS professionals recognize the potential benefits of AI in enhancing library services, and they also acknowledge challenges and express reservations regarding its broader implications for job roles and operational dynamics within library environments.
In Table 6, librarians’ attitudes towards AI are depicted, highlighting their readiness to engage with and comprehend its implications for library services. The responses convey an overall positive perspective, with several statements receiving high mean scores. Librarians strongly agree on the importance of expanding their knowledge about AI and its applications (mean = 4.49) and exhibit curiosity about exploring its ethical dimensions (mean = 4.46). Furthermore, there is confidence in AI’s potential to enhance library services (mean = 4.41) and optimism regarding its future role in libraries (mean = 4.34). While recognizing AI’s potential to introduce new challenges (mean = 4.25) and expressing concerns about its misuse (mean = 4.03), librarians demonstrate a solid grasp of AI concepts (mean = 3.91) and feel competent in articulating AI to others (mean = 3.94). The findings reflect a proactive and well-informed approach among librarians towards embracing AI technology within the library profession.
Attitudes towards AI among librarians
| Attitude statement | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|
| I am open to expanding my knowledge about AI and its applications in libraries | 4.49 | 0.8 |
| I am curious about delving deeper into the ethical implications of AI | 4.46 | 0.78 |
| I see the potential for AI to enhance library services | 4.41 | 0.83 |
| I am hopeful about the role of AI in shaping the future of libraries | 4.34 | 0.82 |
| I recognize that AI may bring about new challenges for libraries | 4.25 | 0.9 |
| I am cautious about the potential misuse of AI | 4.03 | 0.91 |
| I possess a solid understanding of what AI entails | 3.91 | 0.92 |
| I am confident in my ability to articulate AI concepts to others | 3.94 | 0.91 |
| I am acquainted with various types of AI, such as machine learning and NLP | 3.91 | 0.92 |
| I am aware of the current applications of AI in library settings | 3.92 | 0.92 |
The scale used: 1 = Strongly agree; 2 = Agree; 3 = Neutral; 4 = Disagree, and 5 = Strongly disagree.
5 Discussion
The awareness levels of respondents regarding various AI tools. Notably, widely recognized tools such as Grammarly and ChatGPT garnered high awareness rates, indicating their prevalence and utility among LIS professionals. However, lesser-known tools like Curipod, Khanmigo, and LessonPlans.ai exhibited lower awareness levels, suggesting the need for greater dissemination and familiarity with emerging AI technologies within the LIS community. The awareness levels of LIS professionals regarding AI tools vary, with widely recognized tools like Grammarly and ChatGPT enjoying high awareness rates. However, lesser-known tools such as Curipod, Khanmigo, and LessonPlans.ai exhibit lower awareness levels, indicating the need for greater dissemination and familiarity with emerging AI technologies within the LIS community (Nasirian, Ahmadian, & Lee, 2017). This is particularly important given the potential of AI tools to enhance academic work, as highlighted by Pinzolits (2024). The development and implementation of group awareness tools for learning, including AI-based tools, is also a key area for future research (Buder, 2011).
The availability of AI-powered library services reveals a varied adoption landscape among Indian academic libraries. Services such as QR and barcode services, digital preservation, and automated cataloguing and classification demonstrate relatively high adoption rates, indicating their perceived value and utility in enhancing library operations. Conversely, services like VR and AR, as well as guide robots for library users, exhibit lower adoption rates, suggesting potential areas for further exploration and implementation. A range of AI-powered library services are available in Indian academic libraries, with varying adoption rates. Lund et al. (2020) found that services like QR and barcode, digital preservation, and automated cataloguing and classification are highly adopted, while Kim (2019) noted lower adoption rates for VR, AR, and guide robots. Oyetola, Oladokun, Maxwell, and Akor (2023) emphasized the potential of AI in Nigerian libraries, suggesting a low awareness and adoption of its importance. Choukimath, Shivarama, and Gujral (2019) highlighted the application of AI in virtual reference services and the potential impact of AI in academic libraries. These studies collectively underscore the need for further exploration and implementation of AI-powered library services, particularly in the areas of VR, AR, and guide robots.
The perceptions and competence of respondents regarding AI applications within library settings. Respondents displayed a positive outlook towards AI, recognizing its potential to revolutionize library services and enhance resource accessibility. However, variations in familiarity and comfort levels with specific AI applications indicate the need for targeted training and skill development initiatives to facilitate the effective utilization of AI tools among LIS professionals. The application of AI in libraries has been explored in various studies, with a focus on theoretical works and practical implementation projects (Das & Islam, 2021). Public and academic librarians generally hold positive perceptions of AI, with a strong interest in training to enhance their competence. However, there are variations in familiarity and comfort levels with specific AI applications, indicating a need for targeted training and skill development initiatives (Yoon, Andrews, & Ward, 2021). The diffusion of AI technology in libraries is influenced by the perceptions and knowledge of librarians, with implications for the adoption of emerging technologies (Lund et al., 2020). Academic librarians require more training in AI and its potential applications, with recognition of patrons’ interest in AI (Hervieux & Wheatley, 2021).
LIS professionals demonstrate a positive inclination towards AI integration in academic libraries, the findings underscore the importance of addressing concerns surrounding employment implications, budgetary constraints, and skill shortages to facilitate successful and equitable adoption of AI technologies. By proactively addressing these challenges, libraries can harness the transformative potential of AI to enhance service delivery and meet the evolving needs of users in an increasingly digital landscape. Kaushal and Yadav (2022) and Tait and Pierson (2022) both highlight the positive inclination of LIS professionals towards AI integration in academic libraries, with Kaushal and Yadav (2022) emphasizing the potential for diverse services and Tait and Pierson (2022) underscoring the need for AI and robotics education in the LIS curriculum. However, they also identify concerns such as privacy intrusion and task complexity comprehension, as well as the absence of AI and robotics topics in LIS education. Barsha and Munshi (2023) and Okunlaya et al. (2022) further emphasize the need to address these concerns, particularly in developing countries, by proposing practical solutions such as the development of an AI library services innovative conceptual framework and the implementation of partnerships, infrastructure investment, and capacity building. These findings collectively underscore the importance of addressing concerns surrounding AI integration in academic libraries to facilitate successful adoption and enhance service delivery.
Positive attitude towards AI in libraries, with respondents expressing openness to learning more about its applications, ethical implications, and potential benefits. However, there is also an acknowledgement of the need for awareness regarding the challenges and potential malicious uses of AI. The use of AI in libraries is a topic of growing interest, with a positive attitude towards its potential applications and benefits (Barsha & Munshi, 2023; Harisanty et al., 2022; Hussain, 2023; Jha, 2023). However, there is also a recognition of the need for awareness regarding the challenges and potential malicious uses of AI (Barsha & Munshi, 2023; Hussain, 2023; Jha, 2023). This suggests a balanced perspective, with a willingness to explore the benefits of AI while also being cautious about its potential drawbacks.
5.1 Implications
The study’s findings hold significant implications for various aspects of academic libraries in India:
The insights gained can inform policy and practice within academic libraries, aiding policymakers and administrators in developing strategic plans for AI integration. Understanding librarians’ perspectives and attitudes towards AI can guide decision-making processes and resource allocation for effective implementation.
There’s a pressing need to incorporate AI education and training programs into LIS curricula and professional development initiatives. Equipping LIS professionals with AI-related skills and knowledge can enhance their readiness to adapt to evolving library environments.
Interdisciplinary collaborations between LIS professionals and AI researchers hold promise for developing innovative AI-driven solutions tailored to academic library needs. These partnerships can lead to enhanced service delivery and user experiences.
Addressing librarians’ concerns about AI’s impact on employment and resource allocation is crucial. Transparent communication, professional development opportunities, and proactive measures can help mitigate potential negative consequences.
Embracing AI fosters a culture of innovation within academic libraries, paving the way for the exploration and adoption of AI-powered services and technologies. This can revolutionize library services, improve efficiency, and enhance user experiences.
The study suggests future research directions, such as longitudinal studies to assess the long-term impact of AI integration and comparative studies across regions to understand variations in perspectives and practices. Qualitative research methods can delve deeper into librarians’ perceptions and experiences regarding AI in library services, enriching our understanding of the phenomenon.
6 Conclusion
This research illuminates the promising trajectory of AI integration within Indian academic libraries, as perceived by LIS professionals. It highlights not only the widespread recognition of AI’s transformative potential but also the proactive stance towards its adoption despite notable challenges. While optimism prevails, the study underscores the importance of addressing concerns such as budget constraints, skill deficiencies, and ethical considerations. Nevertheless, the prevailing sentiment signifies a readiness to confront these obstacles and embrace AI’s benefits. Looking forward, prioritizing AI education and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration will be pivotal in navigating the complexities of AI integration. By doing so, Indian academic libraries can position themselves to effectively meet the evolving needs of users in an increasingly digital landscape. This journey towards harnessing AI’s potential promises not just innovation but also a redefined and enriched user experience within library services.
6.1 Limitations
While efforts were made to conduct the study rigorously, certain limitations are inherent in the research design. Purposive sampling may limit the generalizability of the findings to the broader population of LIS professionals in India. Additionally, reliance on self-reported data through surveys may introduce response bias or social desirability bias. Furthermore, the cross-sectional nature of the study restricts the ability to infer causality or temporal relationships between variables.
6.2 Future Directions
Future research could explore longitudinal studies to track the long-term impact of AI integration in academic libraries. Comparative studies across different countries or regions could also be conducted to assess variations in perspectives and practices. Moreover, qualitative research methods such as interviews or focus groups could provide deeper insights into the lived experiences and perceptions of LIS professionals regarding AI in library services. Interdisciplinary collaborations between LIS and AI researchers could facilitate the development of innovative AI-driven solutions tailored to the specific needs and challenges of academic libraries in the digital age.
-
Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.
-
Author contributions: Subaveerapandiyan A: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Data Analysis, Investigation, Writing Original Draft, Data Curation. Dattatraya Kalbande: Writing – Data Collection, Data Analysis, Review & Editing, Visualization, Validation, Formal Analysis. Mayank Yuvaraj: Data Analysis, Research Methodology. Manoj Kumar Verma: Review of Literature, Interpretation. Priya Suradkar: Data Analysis, Data Collection, Discussion. Subhash Chavan: Data Collection, Review of Literature.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Author agreement/declaration: This is a statement to certify that all authors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript being submitted. This manuscript has not received prior publication and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
-
Data availability statement: The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Adewojo, A. A., & Dunmade, A. O. (2024). From big data to intelligent libraries: Leveraging analytics for enhanced user experiences. Business Information Review, 02663821241264707. doi: 10.1177/02663821241264707.Search in Google Scholar
Adigun, G. O., Ajani, Y. A., & Enakrire, R. T. (2024). The intelligent libraries: Innovation for a sustainable knowledge system in the fifth (5th) Industrial Revolution. Libri. doi: 10.1515/libri-2023-0111.Search in Google Scholar
Ali, M. Y., Naeem, S. B., & Bhatti, R. (2020). Artificial intelligence tools and perspectives of university librarians: An overview. Business Information Review, 37(3), 116–124. doi: 10.1177/0266382120952016.Search in Google Scholar
Ayinde, L., & Kirkwood, H. (2020). Rethinking the roles and skills of information professionals in the 4th Industrial Revolution. Business Information Review, 37(4), 142–153. doi: 10.1177/0266382120968057.Search in Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, S., & Tamilselvan, N. (2023). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in library services: A systematic review. International Journal of Library & Information Science, 12(1), Article 1.Search in Google Scholar
Banciu, D., & Mantykangas, A. (2018). Library management in the context of the GDPR. eLSE 2018: 14th eLearning and Software for Education Conference, 4, 372–377. doi: 10.12753/2066-026X-18-266.Search in Google Scholar
Barsha, S., & Munshi, S. A. (2023). Implementing artificial intelligence in library services: A review of current prospects and challenges of developing countries. Library Hi Tech News, 41(1), 7–10. doi: 10.1108/LHTN-07-2023-0126.Search in Google Scholar
Bhuiyan, K. H., Ahmed, S., & Jahan, I. (2024). Consumer attitude toward using artificial intelligence (AI) devices in hospitality services. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(2), 968–985. doi: 10.1108/JHTI-08-2023-0551.Search in Google Scholar
Bradley, F. (2022). Representation of libraries in artificial intelligence regulations and implications for ethics and practice. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 71(3), 189–200. doi: 10.1080/24750158.2022.2101911.Search in Google Scholar
Brzustowicz, R. (2023). From ChatGPT to CatGPT: The implications of artificial intelligence on library cataloging. Information Technology and Libraries, 42(3), Article 3. doi: 10.5860/ital.v42i3.16295.Search in Google Scholar
Buder, J. (2011). Group awareness tools for learning: Current and future directions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1114–1117. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.012.Search in Google Scholar
Chandrakar, R., & Arora, J. (2010). Copy cataloguing in India: A point‐of‐view. The Electronic Library, 28(3), 432–437. doi: 10.1108/02640471011052007.Search in Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3443–3463. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7.Search in Google Scholar
Choukimath, P. A., Shivarama, J., & Gujral, G. (2019). Perceptions and prospects of artificial intelligence technologies for academic libraries: An overview of global trends (pp. 79–88). Gandhinagar: INFLIBNET Centre. https://ir.inflibnet.ac.in:8443/ir/handle/1944/2337.Search in Google Scholar
Collins, C., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., & Mikalef, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in information systems research: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102383. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102383.Search in Google Scholar
Cox, A. M., Pinfield, S., & Rutter, S. (2018). The intelligent library: Thought leaders’ views on the likely impact of artificial intelligence on academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 37(3), 418–435. doi: 10.1108/LHT-08-2018-0105.Search in Google Scholar
Das, R. K., & Islam, M. S. U. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in libraries: A systematic review. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), 17. (arXiv:2112.04573). arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2112.04573.Search in Google Scholar
Devika, P., & Milton, A. (2024). Book recommendation system: Reviewing different techniques and approaches. International Journal on Digital Libraries. doi: 10.1007/s00799-024-00403-7.Search in Google Scholar
Diseiye, O., Ukubeyinje, S. E., Oladokun, B. D., & Kakwagh, V. V. (2024). Emerging technologies: Leveraging digital literacy for self-sufficiency among library professionals. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research, 3, 59–59. doi: 10.56294/mr202459.Search in Google Scholar
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., … Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002.Search in Google Scholar
Ehrenpreis, M., & DeLooper, J. (2022). Implementing a chatbot on a library website. Journal of Web Librarianship, 16(2), 120–142. doi: 10.1080/19322909.2022.2060893.Search in Google Scholar
Gasparini, A. A., & Kautonen, H. (2022). Understanding artificial intelligence in research libraries: An extensive literature review. LIBER Quarterly: Te Journal of European Research Libraries, 32(1), 1–36. doi: 10.53377/lq.10934.Search in Google Scholar
Ghosh, S., & McCoy, D. (2024). Looking ahead: Incorporating AI in MLIS competencies. School of Information Student Research Journal, 14(1). https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/ischoolsrj/vol14/iss1/3.Search in Google Scholar
Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Ottaviani, C., Patros, P., Bahsoon, R., Shaghaghi, A., … Uhlig, S. (2022). AI for next generation computing: Emerging trends and future directions. Internet of Things, 19, 100514. doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2022.100514.Search in Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., Spurgin, K., & Crystal, A. (2006). Functionalities for automatic metadata generation applications: A survey of metadata experts’ opinions. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 1(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1504/IJMSO.2006.008766.Search in Google Scholar
Hamad, F., Al-Fadel, M., & Fakhouri, H. (2023). The provision of smart service at academic libraries and associated challenges. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(4), 960–971. doi: 10.1177/09610006221114173.Search in Google Scholar
Harisanty, D., Anna, N. E. V., Putri, T. E., Firdaus, A. A., & Noor Azizi, N. A. (2022). Leaders, practitioners and scientists’ awareness of artificial intelligence in libraries: A pilot study. Library Hi Tech, 42(3), 809–825. doi: 10.1108/LHT-10-2021-0356.Search in Google Scholar
Hechler, E., Weihrauch, M., & Wu, Y. (Catherine). (2023). Intelligent cataloging and metadata management. In E. Hechler, M. Weihrauch, & Y. (Catherine) Wu (Eds.), Data fabric and data mesh approaches with AI: A guide to AI-based data cataloging, governance, integration, orchestration, and consumption (pp. 293–310). Apress. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4842-9253-2_13.Search in Google Scholar
Hervieux, S., & Wheatley, A. (2021). Perceptions of artificial intelligence: A survey of academic librarians in Canada and the United States. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102270. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102270.Search in Google Scholar
Hodonu-Wusu, J. O. (2024). The rise of artificial intelligence in libraries: The ethical and equitable methodologies, and prospects for empowering library users. AI and Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s43681-024-00432-7.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, Y.-H. (2022). Exploring the implementation of artificial intelligence applications among academic libraries in Taiwan. Library Hi Tech, 42(3), 885–905. doi: 10.1108/LHT-03-2022-0159.Search in Google Scholar
Hussain, A. (2023). Use of artificial intelligence in the library services: Prospects and challenges. Library Hi Tech News, 40(2), 15–17. doi: 10.1108/LHTN-11-2022-0125.Search in Google Scholar
Jayavadivel, R., Arunachalam, M., Nagarajan, G., Shankar, B. P., Viji, C., Rajkumar, N., & Senthilkumar, K. R. (2024). Historical overview of AI adoption in libraries. In AI-assisted library reconstruction (pp. 267–289). IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2782-1.ch015.Search in Google Scholar
Jha, S. K. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence in libraries and information centers services: Prospects and challenges. Library Hi Tech News, 40(7), 1–5. doi: 10.1108/LHTN-06-2023-0102.Search in Google Scholar
Kashive, N., Powale, L., & Kashive, K. (2020). Understanding user perception toward artificial intelligence (AI) enabled e-learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1108/IJILT-05-2020-0090.Search in Google Scholar
Kaushal, V., & Yadav, R. (2022). The role of chatbots in academic libraries: An experience-based perspective. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 71(3), 215–232. doi: 10.1080/24750158.2022.2106403.Search in Google Scholar
Khan, R., Gupta, N., Sinhababu, A., & Chakravarty, R. (2023). Impact of conversational and generative AI systems on libraries: A use case large language model (LLM). Science & Technology Libraries, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2023.2254814.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, B. (2019). AI-powered robots for libraries: Exploratory questions. IFLA Annual Congress, 1–10. https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/2700/1/s08-2019-kim-en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Lappalainen, Y., & Narayanan, N. (2023). Aisha: A custom AI library chatbot using the ChatGPT API. Journal of Web Librarianship, 17(3), 37–58. doi: 10.1080/19322909.2023.2221477.Search in Google Scholar
Ledro, C., Nosella, A., & Vinelli, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence in customer relationship management: Literature review and future research directions. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(13), 48–63. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-07-2021-0332.Search in Google Scholar
Li, L., & Coates, K. (2024). Academic library online chat services under the impact of artificial intelligence. Information Discovery and Delivery, (ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/IDD-11-2023-0143.Search in Google Scholar
Liang, J.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Chen, M.-R. A., & Darmawansah, D. (2023). Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education: An integrated bibliographic analysis and systematic review approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4270–4296. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1958348.Search in Google Scholar
Lowagie, H. (2023). From bias to transparency: Ethical imperatives in AI-based library cataloging. 88th IFLA World Library and Information Congress (WLIC), 10. https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/2841.Search in Google Scholar
Lu, X. (2024). Application of artificial intelligence algorithms in precision marketing with flow data analysis models. In 2024 5th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Sustainable Informatics (ICMCSI) (pp. 378–383). doi: 10.1109/ICMCSI61536.2024.00060.Search in Google Scholar
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26–29. doi: 10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009.Search in Google Scholar
Lund, B., Omame, I., Tijani, S., & Agbaji, D. (2020). Perceptions toward artificial intelligence (AI) among academic library employees and alignment with the diffusion of innovations’ adopter categories. College & Research Libraries, 81(5), 865–882. doi: 10.5860/crl.81.5.865.Search in Google Scholar
Marc. (2018, February 9). GDPR compliance for libraries – 5 general aspects that you need to cover | Princh Blog. Princh. https://princh.com/blog-gdpr-compliance-for-libraries-5-general-aspects-that-you-need-to-cover/.Search in Google Scholar
Martzoukou, K. (2020). Academic libraries in COVID-19: A renewed mission for digital literacy. Library Management, 42(4/5), 266–276. doi: 10.1108/LM-09-2020-0131.Search in Google Scholar
Mckie, I. A. S., & Narayan, B. (2019). Enhancing the academic library experience with chatbots: An exploration of research and implications for practice. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 68(3), 268–277. doi: 10.1080/24750158.2019.1611694.Search in Google Scholar
Mishra, H., & Sarvaiya, M. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence tools in engineering pedagogy: A qualitative survey of academic experiences. Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(1), 60–66. doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2024.57864.Search in Google Scholar
Morley, J., Kinsey, L., Elhalal, A., Garcia, F., Ziosi, M., & Floridi, L. (2023). Operationalising AI ethics: Barriers, enablers and next steps. AI & SOCIETY, 38(1), 411–423. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01308-8.Search in Google Scholar
Nardi, B. A., & O’day, V. (1996). Intelligent agents: What we learned at the library. Libri, 46(2), 59–88. doi: 10.1515/libr.1996.46.2.59.Search in Google Scholar
Nasirian, F., Ahmadian, M., & Lee, O.-K. (Daniel). (2017). AI-based voice assistant systems: Evaluating from the interaction and trust perspectives. AMCIS 2017 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2017/AdoptionIT/Presentations/27.Search in Google Scholar
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041.Search in Google Scholar
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221–4241. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w.Search in Google Scholar
Noh, Y. (2015). Imagining library 4.0: Creating a model for future libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 786–797. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2015.08.020.Search in Google Scholar
Okunlaya, R. O., Syed Abdullah, N., & Alias, R. A. (2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) library services innovative conceptual framework for the digital transformation of university education. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1869–1892. doi: 10.1108/LHT-07-2021-0242.Search in Google Scholar
Oyetola, S. O., Oladokun, B. D., Maxwell, C. E., & Akor, S. O. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the library: Gauging the potential application and implications for contemporary library services in Nigeria. Data and Metadata, 2, 36–36. doi: 10.56294/dm202336.Search in Google Scholar
Panda, S., & Chakravarty, R. (2022). Adapting intelligent information services in libraries: A case of smart AI chatbots. Library Hi Tech News, 39(1), 12–15. doi: 10.1108/LHTN-11-2021-0081.Search in Google Scholar
Pinzolits, R. (2024). AI in academia: An overview of selected tools and their areas of application. MAP Education and Humanities, 4, 37–50. doi: 10.53880/2744-2373.2023.4.37.Search in Google Scholar
Priya, S., & Ramya, R. (2024). Future trends and emerging technologies in AI and libraries. In Applications of artificial intelligence in libraries (pp. 245–271). IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-1573-6.ch010.Search in Google Scholar
Rajkumar, N., Viji, C., Mohanraj, A., Senthilkumar, K. R., Jagajeevan, R., & Kovilpillai, J. A. (2024). Ethical considerations of AI implementation in the library era. In Improving library systems with AI: Applications, approaches, and bibliometric insights (pp. 85–106). IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-5593-0.ch007.Search in Google Scholar
Ram, B. (2024). Transforming libraries: The impact of artificial intelligence. IP Indian Journal of Library Science and Information Technology, 8(2), 74–75. doi: 10.18231/j.ijlsit.2023.012.Search in Google Scholar
Rubin, V. L., Chen, Y., & Thorimbert, L. M. (2010). Artificially intelligent conversational agents in libraries. Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 496–522. doi: 10.1108/07378831011096196.Search in Google Scholar
Sallu, S., Raehang, R., & Qammaddin, Q. (2024). Exploration of artificial intelligence (AI) application in higher education: A research study in Kolaka, Southeast Sulawesi. Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing, 6(1), Article 1. doi: 10.47709/cnahpc.v6i1.3396.Search in Google Scholar
Senathirajah, A. R. B. S., bin S Senathirajah, A. R., Alainati, S., Haque, R., Ahmed, S., Khalil, M. I., & Chowdhury, B. (2024). Antecedents and consequence of trust – Commitment towards artificial based customer experience. UCJC Business and Society Review (Formerly Known as Universia Business Review), 21(80), Article 80. https://journals.ucjc.edu/ubr/article/view/4572.Search in Google Scholar
Shen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on employment: The role of virtual agglomeration. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-02647-9.Search in Google Scholar
Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence for a better future: An ecosystem perspective on the ethics of AI and emerging digital technologies. Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-69978-9.Search in Google Scholar
Subaveerapandiyan, A., & Gozali, A. A. (2024). AI in Indian libraries: Prospects and perceptions from library professionals. Open Information Science, 8(1), 20220164. doi: 10.1515/opis-2022-0164.Search in Google Scholar
Tait, E., & Pierson, C. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence and robots in libraries: Opportunities in LIS curriculum for preparing the librarians of tomorrow. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 71(3), 256–274. doi: 10.1080/24750158.2022.2081111.Search in Google Scholar
Taskin, Z., & Al, U. (2019). Natural language processing applications in library and information science. Online Information Review, 43(4), 676–690. doi: 10.1108/OIR-07-2018-0217.Search in Google Scholar
Verma, V. K., & Gupta, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the future libraries. World Digital Libraries – An International Journal, 15(2), 151–166. doi: 10.18329/09757597/2022/15210.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Z. (2017). How do library staff view librarian robotics? Librarian staff’s ignored humanistic views on the impact and threat of robotics adoption. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its impact on libraries and librarianship, Corfu, Greece. https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/2751/.Search in Google Scholar
Wood, B., & Evans, D. (2018). Librarians’ perceptions of artificial intelligence and its potential impact on the profession. Computers in Libraries, 38(1), 10. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs/4125.Search in Google Scholar
Yoon, J., Andrews, J. E., & Ward, H. L. (2021). Perceptions on adopting artificial intelligence and related technologies in libraries: Public and academic librarians in North America. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1893–1915. doi: 10.1108/LHT-07-2021-0229.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Regular Articles
- FSLSM-Based Analysis of Student Performance Information in a Blended Learning Course Using Moodle LMS
- AI in Indian Libraries: Prospects and Perceptions from Library Professionals
- Comprehensive Examination of Version Number Attacks in IoT Networks: Nodes Hyperactivity as Specific Criterion
- AI Literacy and Zambian Librarians: A Study of Perceptions and Applications
- Awareness and Perception of Students Toward Execution of Internet of Things in Library Services: A study of Indian Institute Technologies of Northern India
- Hybrid RSA–AES-Based Software-Defined Network to Improve the Security of MANET
- Enhanced Image-Based Malware Multiclass Classification Method with the Ensemble Model and SVM
- A Qualitative Analysis of Open-Access Publishing-Related Posts on Twitter
- Exploring the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries: A Study on Librarians’ Perspectives in India
- “Librarying” Under the Candlelight: The Impact of Electricity Power Outages on Library Services
- Management of Open Education Resources in Academic Libraries of Nigerian Public Universities
- The Evolution of Job Displacement in the Age of AI and Automation: A Bibliometric Review (1984–2024)
- Review Article
- Open Network for Digital Commerce in India: Past, Present, and Future
- Communications
- Publishing Embargoes and Versions of Preprints: Impact on the Dissemination of Information
- The Detection of ChatGPT’s Textual Crumb Trails is an Unsustainable Solution to Imperfect Detection Methods
Articles in the same Issue
- Regular Articles
- FSLSM-Based Analysis of Student Performance Information in a Blended Learning Course Using Moodle LMS
- AI in Indian Libraries: Prospects and Perceptions from Library Professionals
- Comprehensive Examination of Version Number Attacks in IoT Networks: Nodes Hyperactivity as Specific Criterion
- AI Literacy and Zambian Librarians: A Study of Perceptions and Applications
- Awareness and Perception of Students Toward Execution of Internet of Things in Library Services: A study of Indian Institute Technologies of Northern India
- Hybrid RSA–AES-Based Software-Defined Network to Improve the Security of MANET
- Enhanced Image-Based Malware Multiclass Classification Method with the Ensemble Model and SVM
- A Qualitative Analysis of Open-Access Publishing-Related Posts on Twitter
- Exploring the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries: A Study on Librarians’ Perspectives in India
- “Librarying” Under the Candlelight: The Impact of Electricity Power Outages on Library Services
- Management of Open Education Resources in Academic Libraries of Nigerian Public Universities
- The Evolution of Job Displacement in the Age of AI and Automation: A Bibliometric Review (1984–2024)
- Review Article
- Open Network for Digital Commerce in India: Past, Present, and Future
- Communications
- Publishing Embargoes and Versions of Preprints: Impact on the Dissemination of Information
- The Detection of ChatGPT’s Textual Crumb Trails is an Unsustainable Solution to Imperfect Detection Methods