Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Artikel Open Access

Nanoparticles as SERS substrates: recent progress in hormone sensing

  • , , , ORCID logo EMAIL logo und ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. März 2026
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) has enabled the, ultrasensitive, and real-time monitoring of clinically significant hormones and related health abnormalities such as diabetes, thyroid dysfunction, infertility, stress etc. Plasmonic nanoparticles (PNPs) specifically, silver (Ag) and gold (Au), provide the foundation for signal enhancement due to their localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) and tunable shapes (e.g. spherical, rod, wire, triangle etc.). Recent studies have demonstrated the potential applications of non-plasmonic NPs (Silicon and graphene) and their composites in sensitive detection of hormones in complex biological matrices. Together, the SERS, can detect a wide range of hormones such as insulin, cortisol, dopamine (DA), serotonin (ST), progesterone (P4), etc. at nanomolar (nM) to attomolar (aM) concentrations in complex biological fluids [saliva, blood plasma, serum, sweat (transdermal), cell lysate) and cells. Bimetallic NPs (Ag@Au, Au@Ag), nanocomposites (Si@Ag, Si@Au) have been strategically fabricated to generate high-density electromagnetic hotspots. Further, coupling these substrates with molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), antibodies (Ab), aptamers, Raman reporter molecules (RRM) and flexible supports (silicon wafers, paper, PVC/SEBS, PDMS, electrodes) have improved specificity, biocompatibility, and point-of-care (POC) utility of SERS. Thus, the current review evaluates the future diagnostic potential of NPs as SERS substrates for hormone biosensing, highlighting rational nanostructure design, selective surface functionalization, validation in complex matrices and quantitative comparison, reference standards, and clinically translatable SERS platforms across studies.

1 Introduction

The endocrine system regulates a variety of physiological activities, including growth, metabolism, reproduction, and homeostasis, by secreting hormones into the circulation.

Being key biochemical messengers, hormones are active at extremely low concentrations and serve crucial roles in maintaining the physiological system in an equilibrium [1], [2], [3], [4]. However, hormonal imbalances or abnormal secretions are the characteristics of various clinical illnesses (Table 1), including diabetes mellitus [5], thyroid dysfunction [6], infertility, and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) [7] etc. Thus, the sensitive, specific, and real-time detection of hormones is thus key for early diagnosis [1], 8], 9] treatment monitoring [10], 11], and personalized therapy [12]. Together with their ultra-low concentrations, the structural diversity of hormones ranging from hydrophilic peptides/proteins [Insulin, procalcitonin (PCT), somatostatin etc.] [8], 13], 14] to lipophilic steroids (cortisol, P4, testosterone) [15], 16] and amino acid derived hormones (DA, epinephrine (EPI), norepinephrine(NE) etc.) [3], 4] poses significant challenges in their sensing. Differences in solubility, stability, and molecular size demand varied detection platforms. This complexity hampers the development of a universal strategy for sensing hormones. Traditional approaches (Table 1) have long been considered the gold standard for hormone detection and quantification. While these procedures are reliable and sensitive, they frequently need tedious sample preparation, costly reagents, and trained people, and are unsuitable for POC settings [17], [18], [19], [20].

Table 1:

Clinical significance of hormones and the conventional techniques in practice to detect hormones.

Hormone Source Biological role Diagnostic significance Common detection techniques Ref.
Dopamine (DA) Substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, adrenal medulla Acts as a neurotransmitter; regulates mood, motivation, attention, motor control, and reward mechanisms Early diagnosis of neurological and psychiatric disorders (ADHD, bipolar disorder, depression and addiction), diagnosing Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease. RIA, LC-MS, HPLC, SPR, FRET [3], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]
Epinephrine (EPI) Adrenal medulla Neurotransmitter, fight or flight response

Increases heart rate, blood pressure, and glucose levels

Dilates airways
Indicates adrenal medullary activity, diagnosis of pheochromocytoma monitors stress response

Biomarker for hypertension
ELISA, RIA, HPLC, LC-MS, GC-MS [4], [26], [27], [28]
Norepinephrine (NE) Sympathetic nerve endings, adrenal medulla Neurotransmitter, increases blood pressure via vasoconstriction

Modulates mood, attention, and sleep cycles
Diagnosing NDDs such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, biomarker for hypertension and heart failure, can be biomarker of tumor progression (neuroblastoma), biomarker for depression, anxiety ELISA, RIA, HPLC, LC-MS, GC-MS [29], [30], [31], [32]
Thyroxine (T4)/T3 Thyroid gland Controls metabolism, growth, and development Diagnosing thyroid dysfunction (Hypo-/hyperthyroidism), guiding hormone replacement therapy ELISA, RIA, HPLC, LC-MS [6], 33], 34]
Melatonin Pineal gland Regulating circadian rhythm

Regulating sleep cycle
Sleep disorders (insomnia, delayed sleep phase syndrome), depression RIA, ELISA, LC-MS [14], 35]
Progesterone (P4) Ovaries, placenta Prepares endometrium, supports pregnancy Fertility tracking, pregnancy monitoring, monitoring the menstrual cycle ELISA, RIA, HPLC, LC-MS [36], [37], [38], [39]
Testosterone Testes, ovaries, adrenal gland Development of male sex traits, muscle mass, libido Prostate cancer, Polycystic ovary syndrome, diagnosing androgen disorders ELISA, RIA, HPLC, LC-MS [40], [41], [42], [43]
Cortisol Adrenal cortex Regulates metabolism, stress response Monitoring stress l, adrenal disorders, Cushing’s syndrome, Addison’s disease, cardiovascular diseases ELISA, HPLC, LC-MS [2], [44], [45], [46], [47]
Insulin Pancreas (β-cells) Regulates blood glucose levels Beta-cell function, diabetes diagnosis, glucose control monitoring, ELISA, RIA, HPLC, LC-MS [25], 47], 48]
Erythropoietin (EPO) Kidney Proliferation and maturation of RBCs, Anemia and kidney disease PAGE, ELISA, CE, LC-MS [49], [50], [51], [52], [53]
Luteinizing hormone (LH) Anterior pituitary Spermatogenesis Fertility evaluation, reproductive cycle tracking, hypogonadism ELISA, RIA, HPLC, LC-MS [54]
Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) Anterior pituitary Control ovulation, Fertility evaluation, reproductive cycle tracking ELISA, RIA, HPLC, LC-MS [7], 55], 56]
Growth hormone (GH) Pituitary gland Stimulates growth and cell regeneration Pediatric growth assessment, Endocrine disorder evaluation, acromegaly, dwarfism ELISA, RIA, HPLC, LC-MS [43], 57]
Procalcitonin (PCT) C-cells of the thyroid gland Precursor to calcitonin Sepsis and pyemia Immunofluorescence, ELISA, LIFA [1], 8], 9]
  1. RIA, radioimmunoassay; LC-MS, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; GC-MS, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; CE, capillary electrophoresis; PAGE, poly-acrylamide gel electrophoresis; SPR, surface plasmon resonance, FRET, Förster resonance energy transfer, ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.

In 1974, Fleischmann and coworkers noticed an enhanced Raman intensity of pyridine adsorbed on electrochemically roughened Ag electrodes [58]. This finding was separately confirmed in 1977 by Van Duyne’s group, who ascribed it to increased static electromagnetic (EM) fields, and by Creighton’s group, who explained it in terms of resonant Raman scattering caused by the widening of molecule electronic energy levels [59], 60]. This effect was later termed SERS and is characterized by exceptionally high sensitivity, extending down to the single-molecule detection limit. In recent years SERS has emerged as a powerful biosensing analytical platform, offering ultra-high sensitivity, specificity, and label-free, non-destructive analysis in complicated biological systems [61], 62]. SERS enhances the fundamentally weak Raman scattering signatures by several orders of magnitude by electromagnetic (EM) and chemical (CM) enhancement mechanisms [8], 13], 14]. SERS has gained popularity for diagnostic applications due to its unique ability to detect molecules at trace levels [62], [63], [64].

SERS has rapidly progressed as a powerful tool for hormone sensing by leveraging advances in plasmonic and non-plasmonic nanomaterials and molecular recognition strategies. Early studies primarily focused on AgNPs and AuNPs for highly sensitive detection and structural characterization of peptide hormones such as insulin at nM to Pm concentrations [48], 65], 66]. More recent developments emphasize selectivity and real-world applicability through Ab, aptamer, and MIP functionalized SERS substrates, allowing reliable detection of small molecule hormones in complex biofluids including saliva, sweat, and serum [2], 15], 67], 68]. The integration of flexible, wearable, and microfluidic SERS platforms further highlights the transition of hormone sensing from laboratory demonstrations toward point-of-care (POC) and continuous health monitoring applications [44], 45]. The use of SERS shows great promise hormone sensing, where target analytes are frequently present at femtomolar (fM) to pM levels [2], 63], 64]. Insulin, cortisol, estrogen, testosterone, thyroid hormones (T3, T4), and catecholamines like dopamine (DA), epinephrine (EPI) and norepinephrine (NE) all have natural Raman vibrational modes that can be used to identify and quantify them. The schematic (Figure 1) illustrates the overview of SERS for hormone sensing. Furthermore, SERS’s quick detection capabilities (typically within minutes) and interoperability with portable Raman instruments make it a feasible POC option for hormone sensing [69], [70], [71], [72]. Emerging systems also combine microfluidics [44], 73] and machine learning (ML) [48], 74] to provide automated, high-throughput, and smart hormone profiling, which is beneficial in clinical endocrinology.

Figure 1: 
Schematic illustration of SERS-based hormone detection. Hormones secreted from various glands are detected using SERS active NPs functionalized with specific capture elements and RRM, enabling enhanced Raman signal acquisition for sensitive and selective hormone detection.
Figure 1:

Schematic illustration of SERS-based hormone detection. Hormones secreted from various glands are detected using SERS active NPs functionalized with specific capture elements and RRM, enabling enhanced Raman signal acquisition for sensitive and selective hormone detection.

Despite these benefits, practical use of SERS in hormone detection remains challenging. The repeatability of SERS signals, substrate batch-to-batch variability, signal instability induced by hotspot heterogeneity, and interference from non-specific binding in complex matrices must all be carefully considered [61], 75], 76]. 3D-ordered SERS substrates [77], 78], the use of, functionalized nanostructures, SERS tags, internal references [26], 79] are all potential solutions to these limitations [62]. In addition, hybrid SERS substrates [2], 68] that combine EM and CM enhancement mechanisms are being developed to improve sensitivity and stability. Thus, by combining nanotechnology and surface chemistry SERS offers a powerful platform for precise, rapid, and sensitive hormone detection, paving the way for improved endocrine diagnostics and therapy monitoring. The current review explores the emerging role of various NPs in SERS-based hormone sensing. It covers recent advances in direct and indirect detection methods, highlighting functionalization for selectivity, biological matrices, and quantitative performance. Key clinical challenges and future direction like integration with wearables, real-time monitoring, and multiplexed hormone detection are also discussed.

2 Detection principal hormones by SERS

SERS signal amplification arises from two complementary mechanisms: EM enhancement [80] and CM enhancement [81]. The EM mechanism originates from LSPR in metallic nanostructures. When these nanostructures are illuminated by laser light, collective oscillations of free electrons generate an intense localized EM field, particularly at sharp features and nanoscale junctions known as hotspots (Figure 2a and b). Hormone molecules positioned within these hotspots experience amplified incidents and scattered fields, leading to a strong increase in Raman intensity without involving any electronic interaction between the molecule and the substrate [4], 61], 82]. Beyond this, an additional CM enhancement contribution arises from charge transfer (CT) interactions between the substrate and the hormone molecules (Figure 2c). Upon adsorption, the electronic energy levels of the hormone couple with the Fermi level of metals or the valence and conduction bands of semiconductors. Under laser excitation, electrons can transfer either from the substrate to the hormone or from the hormone to the substrate, transiently modifying the molecular polarizability. The relaxation of these excited charge carriers back to the ground state produces enhanced Raman scattering that carries the vibrational fingerprint of the hormone [61], 83].

Figure 2: 
Fundamental mechanisms of SERS. (a) Illustration of SERS from a molecule adsorbed on AuNPs, showing Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman processes. (b) Schematic depiction of localized surface plasmon resonance generating enhanced EM fields that drive the SERS effect [61], 83]. c) Illustration of SERS from CM mechanism [84].
Figure 2:

Fundamental mechanisms of SERS. (a) Illustration of SERS from a molecule adsorbed on AuNPs, showing Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman processes. (b) Schematic depiction of localized surface plasmon resonance generating enhanced EM fields that drive the SERS effect [61], 83]. c) Illustration of SERS from CM mechanism [84].

The SERS enhancement factor (EF) provides a quantitative measure of how effectively a plasmonic substrate amplifies the Raman signal of an analyte relative to conventional Raman conditions [2], 4], 62]. In general, EF is calculated by comparing the Raman intensity of a characteristic vibrational band obtained under SERS conditions with that measured under normal Raman conditions, while properly normalizing for the corresponding analyte concentrations (or number of probed molecules) [2]. A representative, well-resolved Raman peak typically associated with a specific bond vibration of the target molecule is selected as the marker band. The EF is then expressed as EF = (I SERS/C SERS) (I Raman/R aman). where I SERSand I Ramanare the measured intensities of the chosen Raman band under SERS and normal Raman conditions, respectively, and C SERSand C Ramanare the corresponding analyte concentrations. This approach assumes identical optical acquisition conditions and enables direct comparison of enhancement performance between different substrates. A higher EF indicates stronger EM and/or CM enhancement provided by the SERS-active material, thereby reflecting its superior capability for sensitive molecular detection. Further, a variety of SERS substrates (Figures 3 and 4) have been reported in the literature for hormone sensing. However, the choice of an appropriate SERS substrate is not arbitrary; it is intrinsically linked to the physicochemical characteristics of the target hormone. Factors such as molecular size, polarity, available functional groups, and the inherent binding affinity toward plasmonic surfaces collectively govern the adsorption behavior and, consequently, the detection performance [4], 61], 82]. Peptide and protein hormones such as insulin require biocompatible substrates that preserve native conformation while providing strong EM enhancement. Adaptive Ag films, citrate-reduced AgNPs, and functionalized AuNPs have been shown to enable soft adsorption and conformationally sensitive detection of insulin at sub monolayer and even aM levels [48], 65], 85]. In contrast, though small steroid hormones such as cortisol, estradiol (E2), progesterone exhibit weak intrinsic affinity for bare metal surfaces especially for AgNPs [82] through polar functional groups such as carbonyl (C=O) and hydroxyl (–OH) moieties, the interaction is reversible and orientation dependent necessitating substrates with molecular recognition elements [15], 85]. Catecholamine hormones such as DA, EPI and NE, benefit from Ag/Au nanostructures with high-density nanogaps, where strong chemisorption through phenolic groups and controlled aggregation dramatically enhance sensitivity and enable detection at nM to pM concentrations [4], 77], 86]. Overall, rationally matching hormone chemistry with substrate composition, morphology, and surface functionalization is key to achieve sensitivity, selectivity, and reliability in SERS-based hormone sensing. Hormone specificity is achieved through surface functionalization using Ab, aptamers, or MIPs, which selectively bind the target hormone and position it within the SERS-active region [53], 74], 87], 88]. This strategy enables selective sensing even in complex biofluids. Recent SERS biosensing studies show that capture strategies control selectivity, interference tolerance, reproducibility, and translational potential. Boronic-acid–functionalized Ag substrates enable interaction-driven capture via cis-diol binding, offering intrinsic selectivity, serum tolerance, reduced hotspot variability through frequency-shift readout, good batch consistency, and low cost [89]. Ab-based immunocapture provides excellent specificity in complex matrices but involves multistep functionalization, higher cost, and variability linked to antibody and nanotag quality [1], 9], 62], 74]. Aptamer-mediated systems offer tunable selectivity and improved interference control through conformational design, albeit with greater fabrication complexity [15], 87]. Magnetic Ab–AuNP platforms can exclude washing steps and enhance reproducibility but demand stricter batch control and higher material costs [49], 54].

Figure 3: 
A comprehensive overview of different nanostructures with tailored compositions that have been used in SERS based hormone sensing.
Figure 3:

A comprehensive overview of different nanostructures with tailored compositions that have been used in SERS based hormone sensing.

Figure 4: 
Classification of the SERS substrate types used for hormone detection.
Figure 4:

Classification of the SERS substrate types used for hormone detection.

3 Direct sensing of hormones by SERS

Direct SERS sensing of hormones involves the absorption of hormones directly onto the surface of SERS-active substrates, enabling the acquisition of detailed vibrational spectra without additional labeling [4], 45], 48], 86]. Studies have extensively demonstrated direct detection of insulin, cortisol, DA and other hormones including neurotransmitters (EPI, NE) through direct adsorption on Ag, Au and composite NPs (Table 2), exploring the molecule-surface interactions to achieve both fingerprint identification [14], 48], 65] and quantification [6], 77]. For instance, adaptive silver films (ASF) distinguished insulin isomers at fM levels [65], while DA was detected down to pM concentrations using flexible or nanostructured substrates [63], 64], 78]. Direct sensing enables ultrasensitive, label-free detection of hormones while preserving the molecular specificity of Raman scattering. In direct sensing, hormones are identified through their intrinsic vibrational fingerprint unique bands. Enhancement of these peaks provides insights into hormone structure, substrate interactions, and biomarker relevance in disease diagnosis. Summarizing these spectral signatures aids cross-study comparison, guides selective sensor design, and support clinical translation. Table 3 lists the SERS peak positions of various hormones with their chemical attributions for use in direct clinical hormone analysis.

Table 2:

Summary of recent SERS-based platforms for direct sensing of hormones, detailing plasmonic metal type, nanostructure morphology, target hormone, detection limit, biological matrix, substrate, excitation wavelength.

Metal Shape and size Hormone LOD (M) Biological

Matrix
Excitation wavelength (nm) Ref.
Silver Triangular nanoplates (31–49 nm) Cortisol 5.47 × 10−8 Sweat (chicken skin) 532 and 633 [45]
Silver Spherical colloids (35 nm) Somatostatin 10−6 – 10−8 Aqueous solution 632.8 and 785 [14]
Silver Nanofilms (8 nm thickness) Insulin/lispro ≈ 2.5 × 10−17 Sub monolayer 568.2 [65]
Silver Spherical colloids (60–80 nm) Dopamine Aqueous solution 488 [86]
Silver Spherical NPs (50 nm) Dopamine 4.28 × 10−9 Aqueous solution 785 [90]
Silver Nanoroughened silver plate Dopamine Qualitative Aqueous solution 633 [91]
Silver Vertical array of aptamer functionalized AgNPs Progesterone (P4) 4.0 × 10−10 [15]
Silver Ascorbic acid functionalized spherical colloids (50 nm) Thyroxine (T4) 1.0 × 10−11 Methanol: water solution of T4 632.8 [6]
Silver Spherical colloids Azo-coupled TRH 1.0 × 10−12 Human serum 532 [92]
Gold Spherical NPs Epinephrine 5.46 × 10−7 Aqueous solution 785 [30]
Gold Suspension of spherical NPs (16.4 nm) Norepinephrine and epinephrine 1.89 × 10−4

1.09 × 10−4
Aqueous solution 785 nm [29], [30], [31], [32]
Gold Fe-NTA functionalized spherical colloids (47.7 nm) Epinephrine (EP) 1.0 × 10−9 Human serum 633 [28]
Gold Ascorbic acid functionalized spherical colloids (50 nm) Thyroxine (T4) 1.0 × 10−6 Methanol: water solution of T4 632.8 nm [6]
Gold Mixed spherical and hexagonal (30–40 nm) Cortisol 2.76 × 10−4 Saliva 532 [70]
Gold Spherical colloids (55–80 nm) Insulin Qualitative Aqueous solution 785 [85]
Gold Spherical colloids (80 ± 18 nm) Insulin Qualitative Aqueous solution 785 [66]
Gold 3D-nano pillars Insulin 3.5 × 10−11 Pancreatic islets 785 [3], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]
Gold Vertically aligned nanopillars Dopamine 1.0 × 10−10 Spiked urine 785 [71]
Gold Irregular/polyfaceted clusters Dopamine 1.0 × 10−12 Buffer 532 [63]
Gold Nanourchins Cortisol < 2.8 × 10−7 Human serum

Human urine
533 [88]
Bimetallic Silver core-gold shell (Ag@AuNPs/MIP) (180.3 nm) Cortisol 1.0 × 10−11 Artificial saliva 785 [2], 63], 64]
Composite AgNPs enriched silicon wires Dopamine 6.56 × 10−10 Human serum 633 [77]
Composite Aptamer functionalized-MOFCe supported Ag nanoclusters Dopamine 8.0 × 10−12 Human serum [87]
Table 3:

Reported SERS peak positions of hormones and their corresponding vibrational assignments, highlighting characteristic molecular fingerprints relevant for direct hormone detection.

Hormone Peak (cm−1) Peak assignment Ref.
Cortisol 1,268 CH bend + CH2 wag + OH bend modes [45]
1,500 C–C–C deformation in the cholesterol skeleton, or to a significant downshift of the C–C bond vibration [45]
1,609 C=C stretch [70]
1,641 C=O stretch [70]
1,645 C=O stretching in the A ring of the cortisol molecule [70]
Dopamine 1,627 C=O stretch (quinone)/indole-type ring vibration region [86]
1,591 Aromatic C=C skeletal in-plane; OH stretch; NH3 +/indole ring vibrations [86]
1,549 Aromatic skeletal C=C – in-plane (pyrrole-like) vibration [86]
1,516 O–H bending [6], 77]
1,504 C=C in-plane vibration (pyrrole region) [86]
1,490 Catechol ring breathing [71], 91]
1,468 ν19b [6], 77]
1,409 Indole ring vibration and C–N stretch/C=C, C=N in-plane vib. [86]
1,395 N–H twisting [6], 77]
1,339 C–N stretch in pyrrole/indole ring vibration region [86]
1,328/1,333, 1,279/1,284 C=O stretching [91]
1,305 C–OH stretch and O–H deformation (phenolic groups) [86]
1,284 C–O stretching [6], 77]
1,226 Coupled C=O stretch and O–H in-plane deformation [86]
1,174 C–H and N–H in-plane deformation [86]
1,148/1,156 ν15 [6], 77]
1,109 C–H in-plane deformation [86]
1,266, 1,324, 1,428, and 1,480 C=O stretching and C–H deformation mode [90]
Insulin 1,003 Phenylalanine (Phe) ring-breathing [3], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [65]
500–550/400–500 –S–S– str region of –C–S–S–C– link
511 –S–S– str, gauche-gauche-gauche (g-g-g) conformation
530 –S–S– str, trans-gauche-gauche (t-g-g) conformation
551 –S–S– str, gauche-trans-gauche (g-t-g) conformation
630–7,20,620–704 –C–S– str region of –C–C–S–S–C– link
600–750 –C–C–S–S–C– link
636 Phe (Val), in plane ring bending mode of Phe
639 –C–S– str of Pt2+ isomer of –C–S–C– link
682 –C–S– str of Pt2+ isomer of –C–S–C– link
700 –C–C–S–S–C– link
725 Skeletal bending of insulin
<800/741 Skeletal bending in insulin
761 Aromatic residue
842 Tyrosine ring breathing
867 Tyrosine ring breathing
900–940, 1,125–1,151, 1,055–1,080 C=O str of –COO, asymmetric str of Cα–N and str of Cα=N
888 C–C–C– str in proteins
918 Sym C–C– str of –C–COO- in protein
942 Sym C–C– str of –C–C–N–N– in α-helical skeleton
966 C–C– skeletal vibration of –N–Cα–C– in random coil
1,004/999 Sym ring breathing of phenylalanine
1,029 In plane ring –C–H– bending mode of Phe
1,033 C–C– str in proteins
1,066 –C–N– str in proteins
1,086 –C–N– str in proteins
1,120 –C–N– str in proteins
1,206–1,240/1,226 Amide III region/Amide-III β-sheet
1,243–1,253/1,247 Protein coil structure/β-conformation of Amide-III band
1,255–1,280/1,283 Amide III band
1,306 C–N, Cα–H vibration in proteins/def of Cα–H
1,346 C–H def/peak related α-helical structure
1,397 C–H def and/or Amide-III, symmetric stretch of COO group
1,447 Def of –CH2–, –CH3–/CH2 def/of –C–H in –CH2–/CH3
1,516 Tyr/Phe/–C–C– str mode of tyrosine
1,617 Amide-I (–C=O str)
1,655 Amide-I region/Amide-I β-sheet
1,660–1,700/1,709 Amide-I region/Amide-I β-sheet
Epinephrine and Norepinephrine 590 COO deformation [29], [30], [31], [32]
790 Ring breathing [29], [30], [31], [32]
1,080 CCH bending [29], [30], [31], [32]
1,168 CO stretching [29], [30], [31], [32]
1,280 CO asymmetric stretching [30]
1,482 C–C stretching [28]
1,593 CC aromatic stretching [28]

3.1 Direct sensing of hormones by AgNPs

AgNPs have emerged as key substrates for SERS based hormone detection due to their excellent plasmonic properties, biocompatibility, and adaptability to various sensor architectures such as conventional glass slides [72], 83], microfluidics [73], 93] microchips [54], micro-disk electrodes modified with Ag nanoflowers [1] flexible polymeric films for wearables [45], etc. Additionally, nanostructured Ag substrates with ionic modulation [91] and porous silicon (Si) nanowires (SiNWs) decorated with AgNPs [78] have shown remarkable signal enhancement capabilities. These diverse platforms underscore the versatility of AgNPs in enabling ultrasensitive, selective, and label-free hormone detection. Across multiple studies, AgNPs have been utilized in diverse forms (Figure 3) colloids [14], 86], composites, superlattices [68], and embedded nanostructures [67] to enable ultrasensitive detection of hormones, marking their crucial role in biomedical diagnostics. AgNPs exhibit exceptional sensitivity in hormone detection [65], 78] due to their strong plasmonic properties and ability to create dense SERS hotspots. AgNP-based platforms could detect insulin isomers at as low as 25 aM [65]. For cortisol, flexible substrates embedded with triangular AgNPs achieve detection limits as low as 5.47 × 10−8 M [45] confirming that, the AgNPs as ultrasensitive SERS-active materials for hormone sensing. Beyond detection and quantification, AgNPs have enabled probing the conformational changes in peptide hormones like insulin. An early study demonstrated the application of SERS in distinguishing human insulin and insulin lispro (isomer of insulin) at concentration of 25 aM using the ASF with a sub-monolayer density [65]. Simple colloidal AgNPs have shown the ability to probe the pH and temperature dependent transformation of insulin from native secondary structure to β-sheet enriched conformation and vice-versa [1], 25], 48], 65], 85], 94]. One of the most explored hormones using SERS is cortisol. Molecularly imprinted monolithic columns embedded with AgNPs (MIMC@Ag) provided selective cortisol recognition in saliva in the presence of cortisol analogies such as estradiol (E2), cholesterol and dexamethasone, highlighting the integration of molecular imprinting and plasmonic enhancement for specificity [95]. The detection of DA and other neurotransmitters using AgNPs also demonstrates the broad diagnostic utility of AgNPs. AgNP clustering via surface acoustic waves (SAW) allowed detection down to 1.14 pM, with significant signal enhancement from nanogap-induced hotspots [90]. Electrolyte-assisted co-adsorption influenced DA orientation and spectral intensities on nanostructured Ag surfaces, showing that ionic environments can modulate SERS response significantly [91]. Moreover, label-free SERS detection using citrate- and hydroxylamine-reduced AgNPs revealed in situ oxidation of DA to Poly-DA under laser exposure, offering insights into DA’s redox dynamics [86]. Extending beyond, AgNPs were integrated into multi-metal, multi-wavelength SERS platforms for the detection of a broad spectrum of neurotransmitters including melatonin, glutamate, GABA (Gamma-aminobutyric acid), NE, and EPI, emphasizing substrate and excitation wavelength optimization for maximal enhancement [4]. AgNPs deposited vertically on anodic alumina (AgNPs/AAO) created dense vertical hotspot arrays, enabling highly selective aptamer-based detection of progesterone with detection limits in the sub-nanomolar range [15]. For thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), an azo coupling reaction combined with AgNP-induced SERRS allowed ultrafast detection down to 1 pg/mL within complex serum matrices, demonstrating unmatched sensitivity and time efficiency [92]. Lastly, the interaction of fibrillogenic peptide hormone somatostatin-14 with AgNPs was investigated through SERS to map anchoring sites and aggregation behavior, revealing distinct metal surface-specific binding mechanisms and facilitating peptide corona formation on nanoparticle surfaces [14]. Collectively, these studies establish AgNPs as highly adaptable and sensitive platforms for the SERS-based detection of a wide array of hormones and neurotransmitters, offering applications ranging from POC testing and pharmaceutical stability monitoring to clinical diagnosis and psychiatric biomarker profiling.

3.2 Direct sensing of hormones by AuNPs

The choice between AuNPs and AgNPs for SERS detection of hormones is primarily specific to desired sensitivity, stability, biocompatibility, and fabrication flexibility. AgNPs offer stronger EM enhancement than AuNPs and are favored for high-sensitivity detection [96] due to their sharper plasmonic resonances, as demonstrated in ultra-sensitive hormone and neurotransmitter assay. However, AuNPs are preferred in biological systems because of their superior chemical stability, ease of functionalization (e.g., with thiols aptamers), and lower cytotoxicity [96], 97] making them ideal for wearable sensors, in vivo monitoring, and multiplexed detection platforms [16], 44]. In the case of direct SERS sensing using AuNPs, nano colloids involve simply mixing the sample with the NPs [70], 98], which leads to the formation of aggregates between the hormone of the interest and the NPs [14], 35]. These clusters create SERS hotspots, which boost the Raman signal intensity [14], 35]. Different shapes and types of Au nanostructures including nanospheres [29], 85], nano-rods [63], nanowires (NWs) [44], nano-stars [79] nano hexagons [70], triangle nano-triangle, nano-pentagons [63], triangle nanoplates [45], nano-urchins [88], etc. have been used for this purpose (Figure 3). The hormone cortisol, a key stress biomarker, has been a frequent target in POC (wearable) biosensing research. In a notable study, parchment-paper-based lateral flow strips were fabricated using hexagonal AuNPs as SERS-active probes for cortisol detection in saliva [70]. The platform achieved qualitative detection down to 100 μg/mL which is equivalent to 276 nM, offering better enhancement than spherical ones due to increased surface area and sharp features that support stronger plasmonic activity. When the surface of the NPs is appropriately functionalized, they facilitate direct, label-free SERS-based detection with high sensitivity, molecular specificity, and reproducibility. Multiple studies have demonstrated the applicability of AuNPs in detecting a variety of hormones including cortisol [16], 44], thyroxine, DA, P4, E2, insulin, and others, each with tailored sensing architecture and functional strategy. Expanding on flexibility and integration, a PDMS-based wearable SERS device functionalized with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) allowed immobilization of AuNPs and aptamers for sweat cortisol detection. The system demonstrated a wide detection range (0.1–1,000 nM), fast response time, and mechanical durability, making it suitable for real-time physiological tracking [16], 73]. The studies have also demonstrated the sensitive detection of hormones by functionalizing the AuNPs with specific capture elements such as (e.g. MIPs [73] and Antibodies [99] other than aptamers. A study by Yilmaz et al. (2022) used MIPs coated with AuNPs selective and robust detection of cortisol by imprinting cortisol onto a polymer matrix embedded with N-methacryloyl-l-histidine methyl ester (MAH) functionalized AuNPs, a highly specific plasmonic sensor with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.0087 ppb (24 pM) and strong imprinting efficiency was developed, showing outstanding selectivity in the presence of structurally similar steroid hormones [88], 99]. The use of urchin-shaped α-FeOOH@Au NPs for cortisol detection further reinforced the versatility of AuNP morphologies. These nano-urchins, functionalized with aptamers, enabled RRM-free detection in serum and urine with a detection limit below 0.28 μmol/L and high stability in high-salt or protein-rich environments [88]. Beyond steroid hormones like cortisol, the AuNPs have been extensively used for sensing the amino-acid derived hormones such as DA, EPI, NE (Tyrosine derived) and Melatonin and T4 (Tryptophan derived). Niihori et al., 2023 demonstrated the detection of DA using a monolayer of closely packed AuNPs assembled on glass. These formed sub-nanometer plasmonic gaps which significantly enhanced the SERS signal. Although Fe (III) was used to sensitize the nanogaps, the plasmonic enhancement originated solely from the AuNPs. The platform demonstrated high uniformity, repeatability, and a 5000-fold enhancement per hotspot over solution-phase colloidal aggregates due to the fixed nanogap architecture and precise analyte positioning [72]. In the other study, bare Au-nanopillar arrays were electrochemically roughened to generate hotspots in situ. This method enabled label-free detection of DA (LOD - 0.1 nM) in real human urine without any composite matrix or external functionalization, emphasizing structural optimization of pure gold for high-sensitivity sensing [71]. Whereas the lectin functionalized (for capturing the EPO from blood plasma) Au-nanopillars a detection limit as low as 0.1 pM [49]. E2, a key estrogen hormone, was sensed using MIP-modified AuNPs. The imprinted sites enabled the specific rebinding of E2 in human serum, with an LOD of 0.01 nM and high selectivity over other endocrine hormones. The gold substrate also permitted regeneration and reuse, indicating practical viability for continuous hormone tracking [100]. AuNP-based SERS platforms also have been applied for structural and aggregation studies of Insulin. One study utilized citrate-capped AuNPs to observe protein corona formation and conformational changes in insulin upon adsorption. The SERS signals revealed time-dependent changes in disulfide bond vibrations and aromatic amino acid modes, providing insights into nanoparticle-induced protein unfolding [66]. Another study characterized prefibrillar insulin oligomers using AuNP-assisted SERS, detecting early-stage aggregation events and shifts in secondary structure markers a crucial advancement for understanding amyloidogenic pathways [85]. Thyroxine (T4) – a thyroid hormone crucial in metabolic regulation – was detected using AuNPs stabilized with ascorbic acid. This study achieved a limit of detection of 1 µM for T4, with AuNPs providing higher stability in biological matrices compared to silver, despite the latter’s superior enhancement properties [6]. This validates AuNPs as robust SERS substrates even in situations where slightly lower sensitivity is traded for stability and compatibility in physiological environments.

3.3 Direct sensing of hormones by BNPs

Monometallic nanoparticles (MMNPs) cannot equally enhance all the Raman bands of a molecule [14]. Consequently, BNPs are among the recently proposed and extensively studied SERS active substrates, due to their synergistic effects, facile fabrication, high stability, exceptional optical properties, signal enhancement effects and tunable LSPR in UV-Vis-NIR region [101], 102]. However, very few studies have demonstrated the application BNPs in hormone sensing. BNPs, in core–shell (CS) configurations like Ag@Au [2] or Au@Ag [98], 103], have significantly improved the sensitivity and specificity in hormone sensing. Their combined plasmonic effects enhance the signal intensity while stabilizing the sensing platform [2], 103]. Incorporation of an Au shell onto an Ag core (Ag@Au) effectively strengthens SPR, resulting in enhanced EM fields and higher SERS sensitivity, while simultaneously improving the chemical stability of Ag by protecting it from oxidation and structural degradation [2]. Peng et al. 2025 reported the ultrasensitive detection of cortisol at a concentration of 10 pM in saliva using Ag@Au core shell NPs (Ag@Au CS NPs). Where the NPs were integrated with MIPs specific for cortisol binding [2]. Besides, studies have also shown the potential application of spatially separated BNPs for hormone sensing [104], 105]. In contrast, although AuNPs are easy to synthesize and offer excellent tunability and stability, they generally provide lower enhancement compared to AgNPs. On the other hand, AgNPs suffer from poor size control and limited stability. To balance these complementary advantages, Au core Ag shell nanoparticles (Au@Ag NPs) have been developed, combining the strong plasmonic enhancement of Ag with the synthetic control and chemical stability of Au [101], 102], thereby offering optimized performance for reliable and sensitive SERS applications. Van Le et al. 2023 synthesized basic colloidal Au@Ag-CS-NPs without any functionalization, for selectively detecting DA at nM level in the aqueous solution. Where, the DA mediated aggregation of Au@Ag NPs generated a strong electromagnetic ‘hot spots’ in the clustered NPs. Notably, the addition of Fe3+ ions to the colloidal solution of NPs intensified the aggregation which significantly improved the SERS detection of DA [98]. A similar configuration (Au@Ag) was used to synthesize nano-sea urchins followed by fabricating plasmonic superlattice membranes on Si-wafer which demonstrated label-free DA detection with excellent enhancement, reliability, and reproducibility with a limit of detection 0.1 nM [68]. Further, Pu et al. 2019 functionalized the Au@Ag NPs with RRM Cy3 labeled E2-aptamer to synergistically enhance SERS responses for aptamer-based detection of 17β-E2 (Estradiol) with an excellent signal correlation and specificity, achieved a detection limit of 2.75 fM highlighting the ultra-sensitive capabilities of BNPs in endocrine analysis [103]. Zhu et al. 2022 demonstrated a SERS assay for detecting azo-derivatized DA using a spatially separated AgNPs and AuNPs decorated metal–organic framework (Ag–Au-MIL-101). The platform achieved an ultra-low LOD of 1.2 pM [105]. Complementing this, cerium (Ce) metal-organic frameworks loaded with Ag nanoclusters (MOFCeAgNC) supported aptamer-based detection of DA at ultralow concentrations, suitable for real serum analysis [87]. The high surface area and porous structure of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) enabled dense, uniform loading of Ag and AuNPs, generating abundant plasmonic “hot spots” for strong EM enhancement while preventing the aggregation of NPs. Also, the tunable porous structure of MOFs and specific metal ions centered in MOFs provide a “force” to effectively trap the target molecules into the vicinity of hot spots. Most importantly, embedding the AgNPs in MOFs enhances chemical stability, reduces Ag oxidation [105]. Overall, BNPs demonstrate enhanced reproducibility, reduced detection limits, and improved selectivity across reported studies, making them essential components of modern hormone biosensing platforms for diverse body fluids such as saliva, serum, and urine.

3.4 Nanocomposites as SERS-active substrates

Traditional noble metal (Ag, Au) SERS substrates have achieved ultrasensitive detection of hormones [106]. However, their high cost severely limits their development for practical applications, especially for clinical applications [106]. Nanocomposites enable synergistic EM and CM enhancement, improved dielectric coupling, and controlled hotspot formation [107]. The composite architecture enhances analyte adsorption, suppresses nanoparticle aggregation, reduces oxidation of Ag, and improves signal reproducibility in complex biological matrices, which is crucial for reliable hormone detection [107]. The excellent selectivity enhancement of nanocomposite SERS substrates enables them to accurately identify target molecules in complex systems, and their outstanding spectral stability and repeatability make them emerging SERS-active nanomaterials [1], 8], 47], 108]. nanocomposite substrates have significantly advanced the capabilities of SERS based hormone sensing by combining the powerful EM field enhancement of noble metals with the chemical stability and functional tunability of semiconductors. This fusion offers superior sensitivity, specificity, and applicability across a range of bioanalytical contexts [47], 67], 108].The performance of these hybrid substrates is primarily driven by EM and CM enhancement. Noble metal NPs, particularly Ag and Au exhibit LSPR, generating intense EM fields or “hot spots” that amplify Raman signals by several orders of magnitude. Semiconductors complement this by facilitating CT between the analyte [83] and the metal substrate [50], [51], [52]. Together, they produce hybrid nanostructures with highly active SERS responses [47], 107], 109] enhancing signal clarity, improving selectivity, and sensitivity. Structurally, several strategies have been employed to maximize these effects. Vertically aligned SiNWs have been used to anchor AgNPs (SiNWs@Ag) in 3D porous architecture (Figure 5), increasing surface area and improving analyte adsorption. This approach proved effective for neurotransmitter (DA) quantification in plasma and serum with detection limit as low as 0.1 nM and the quantification range between 0.1 and 0.5 nM, enabling significant differentiation between healthy and clinical populations in depression diagnostics [77]. A similar configuration (SiNWs@Ag) was used to detect DA and serotonin with aM sensitivity and mixture discrimination, showcasing their real biological fluid applicability [78].

Figure 5: 
SiNWs@Ag enabled SERS platform for quantification of dopamine in biological matrices. (A) Fabrication of silver-enriched silicon nanowires (SiNWs@Ag) and their application for SERS-based detection of plasma dopamine (DA) in human blood samples. (B) Raman spectra of DA at concentrations ranging from 10−7 to 10−11 M in ethanol. (C) Calibration curve showing the linear relationship between −log C (DA) and the peak intensity at 1,148 cm−1. (D) Raman spectra of DA (10−7 to 10−11 M) in human serum. (d) Calibration curve for −log C (DA) versus peak intensity at 880 cm−1. (e) Raman spectra of DA (10−7 M), norepinephrine (NE, 10−7 M), and a DA–NE mixture (both 10−7 M) in ethanol; black numbers indicate Raman peaks common to both DA and NE [77].
Figure 5:

SiNWs@Ag enabled SERS platform for quantification of dopamine in biological matrices. (A) Fabrication of silver-enriched silicon nanowires (SiNWs@Ag) and their application for SERS-based detection of plasma dopamine (DA) in human blood samples. (B) Raman spectra of DA at concentrations ranging from 10−7 to 10−11 M in ethanol. (C) Calibration curve showing the linear relationship between −log C (DA) and the peak intensity at 1,148 cm−1. (D) Raman spectra of DA (10−7 to 10−11 M) in human serum. (d) Calibration curve for −log C (DA) versus peak intensity at 880 cm−1. (e) Raman spectra of DA (10−7 M), norepinephrine (NE, 10−7 M), and a DA–NE mixture (both 10−7 M) in ethanol; black numbers indicate Raman peaks common to both DA and NE [77].

Further, graphene (Gr) based nanocomposites have also been extensively incorporated due to their excellent electrical, chemical and biocompatible properties [8], 67], 108], large surface area and [108] capacity for uniform nanoparticle dispersion. Graphene is a one-atom-thick carbon material with a hexagonal crystal structure ideal for sensing applications. It has been functionalized with AgNPs and utilized as a SERS substrate [8]. A two-dimensional (2D) graphene (single layer graphene) based configuration combined with Ab functionalized AgNPs, achieving sensitive detection of PCT for early sepsis diagnosis [8]. Further enhancement of SERS performance has been achieved through functional modifications such as the use of mesoporous silica. This material offers controlled pore structures that regulate nanoparticle dispersion and interparticle gaps, improving signal-to-background ratios. A mesoporous silica modified rGO platform demonstrated excellent reproducibility and sensitivity (<0.2 ng/mL) in detecting parathyroid hormone (PTH) relevant to chronic kidney disease [67]. Similarly, a flower-like hybrid composed of graphene oxide and MoS2, functionalized with a cortisol-specific DNA aptamer, achieved rapid and selective detection in serum samples, reflecting its potential for stress biomarker monitoring [47]. 3D Gr-based substrates, when combined with Gr quantum dots (GQDs) and Ag NPs, have also demonstrated exceptional SERS activity for detecting DA with a LOD of 0.1 nM [8]. Across these studies, hybrid platforms consistently achieved detection limits ranging from fM to low nM concentrations, often with strong reproducibility and minimal sample preparation. Their adaptability to various biomarkers including neurotransmitters (DA, NE) and other hormones, inflammatory proteins (PCT), and metabolic peptides (Insulin) highlights their versatility in biomedical sensing. Importantly, many of these platforms demonstrated compatibility with complex biological fluids such as blood serum or plasma [47], 77], 108] without compromising sensitivity or selectivity.

Although the direct sensing approach provides high sensitivity and molecular specificity, the low abundance of hormones, and the complexity of biological fluids contribute to low signal intensities, making identification challenging and intricate. Furthermore, uneven aggregation of SERS active nanostructures may cause low reproducibility [62], 106]. Therefore, choosing more advanced SERS substrates such as SERS tags with a tailored composition is the key for achieving high sensitivity and reproducibility.

4 Indirect hormone sensing by SERS tags

One of the most significant challenges in hormone sensing is the complexity of biological matrices, where co-existing molecules such as proteins, lipids, nucleic acids and other metabolites can mask or interfere with the Raman signal of the target analyte [62], 76], 110]. But SERS could overcome this issue by employing a unique architecture of nanoprobes commonly known as SERS tag. SERS tags are often constructed with a plasmonic core (Ag or Au NPs) that serves as the signal-enhancing element, a RRM for generating distinct spectral fingerprints, and a specific capture element such as Ab, aptamers, or molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) to ensure selective target binding. has broadened the field of hormone sensing by SERS [3], 44], 93]. These customized SERS tags function as ‘three-in-one’ probes, allowing for selective binding, signal production, and multiplexed analysis [79] in a single step. SERS tags overcome the intrinsic limitations of low Raman cross-sections and matrix interferences by generating stable, amplified, and highly specific Raman signals upon interaction with the target hormone molecule even in the complex biological matrix. The RRMs such as 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA) [44], 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid (4-MPBA) [3], aminothiophenol (4-ATP) [54], or methylene blue (MB) produces intense fingerprint peaks (Table 4) when positioned at plasmonic “hotspots” of nanostructures like nanostars, nanorods, core–shell dimers, or binary nanosphere arrays. An innovative approach of wearable technology came through the development of a silk fibroin-based opal structure (SFOS) skin patch. The SFOS skin patch was prepared by first forming a monolayer polystyrene (PS) opal structure (∼1 µm spheres) on a silk fibroin film via interfacial self-assembly. A 10 nm chromium adhesion layer and 90 nm gold film were then deposited by magnetron sputtering. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-capped silver nanospheres (∼58 nm) were self-assembled onto the Au-coated opal structure to create a binary nanosphere array. This flexible SFOS/Au/Ag NSs substrate was integrated into a multi-layer wearable microfluidic patch for SERS detection invasive cortisol monitoring in sweat (Figure 6), which utilizes a pseudoknot-assisted aptamer that undergoes conformational switching upon cortisol binding, bringing MB closer to the nanosphere array and significantly enhancing the Raman signal of the 4-MBA attached to the binary Ag-NPs array [44]. Another approach involves Ag nanostructures functionalized with 4-MPBA, where DA binding induces a constrained vibrational shift in the Raman reporter’s peak position from 1,075.6 cm−1–1,084.7 cm−1 providing a ratiometric signal readout directly proportional to DA concentration in serum [3]. Zipper-like Ag nanodimers with uniform 1 nm gaps functionalized with DA-specific aptamers and Raman reporter DTNB, the sensor achieved a 10 aM LOD in buffer and 10 fM in serum. Integrated into a microfluidic chip with a 3D neuronal culture unit, it enabled real-time monitoring of drug-stimulated DA release from living neurons highlighting potential for in situ clinical diagnostics and neurological research [93]. DA is the most explored hormone for its detection and quantification by innovative SERS strategies, Lu et al. 2023 proposed a nanoarray of n-type semiconductors with tungsten trioxide (WO3) and tin oxide (SnO2) flake-based SERS tag for detecting DA in SH-SY5Y (neuroblastoma) cell lysates [72]. The study used single stranded DNA as aptamer and to which, the MB was attached as RRM. The study demonstrated a significant SERS activity due to the combined effect of charge transfer from WO3 SnO2 and the molecular resonance effect of MB. Further, Ab-conjugated AuNPs based SERS immunoassays have received a lot of interest in recent years due to their high sensitivity. In a more classical immunoassay format, studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of plasmonic NPs as SERS substrates for the sensitive detection of peptide hormones such as recombinant EPO (rEPO) and PCT. Zhang et al., 2023 demonstrated a double-antibody sandwich format. Raman-labeled (XP013) core–shell BNPs (Au@XP013@AgNPs) and streptavidin-coated magnetic beads enable magnetic enrichment and detection of PCT within 15 min. The assay shows excellent linearity across 0–20 ng/mL PCT and a low detection limit of 0.012 ng/mL [9]. Whereas the other study Au-nanorods functionalized with Raman reporters (DTNB) and anti-rEPO antibodies enabled two SERS-based immunoassays, achieving detection limits below 0.1 pg/mL in urine through nanoextraction and sandwich assays [53]. In the former case, XP013 was used as Raman reporter. Further, studies have also demonstrated SERS-based lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) strategies for ultrasensitive TSH detection using AuNPs with malachite green isothiocyanate (MGITC) as reporter molecule. Because LFIA strips offer notable advantages over conventional SERS-based immunoassays, including rapid analysis, operational simplicity, minimal interference from chromatographic separation, and enhanced long-term stability [111], 112]. Choi et al. (2017) employed a conventional single-flow LFIA format with ∼37 nm AuNPs functionalized with MGITC and anti-TSH antibodies, achieving a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.025 μIU/mL two orders of magnitude more sensitive than naked-eye LFIA – enabling detection in both hyper- and hypothyroidism ranges with strong reproducibility and minimal cross-reactivity, demonstrating clear potential for POC translation due to its 10 min assay time and compatibility with serum samples [113]. In the dual-flow LFIA developed by Kim et al. (2021), two distinct sizes of Raman reporter–labeled AuNPs; 25 nm biotin-BSA–AuNPs and 45 nm avidin–AuNPs – were sequentially delivered to the test zone (Figure 6). The high-affinity biotin–avidin interaction brought the nanoparticles into proximity, while the size disparity promoted dense interparticle coupling. This arrangement generated abundant plasmonic “hot spots,” significantly amplifying the electromagnetic enhancement effect and thereby boosting the SERS signal. Such dual-size, biorthogonal nanoparticle pairing can overcome the sensitivity limitations of single-size systems, enabling reliable detection of very low TSH concentrations critical for early hyperthyroidism diagnosis [114].

Table 4:

Summary of SERS-based hormone and biomarker detection studies, detailing the target molecule, specific capture element, Raman reporter used, characteristic Raman peaks and limits of detection (LOD).

Target molecule Specific capture

element
Raman reporter molecules Raman peaks (cm−1) LOD Ref.
Dopamine (DA) 4-MPBA (boronic acid-functionalized) 4-MPBA 1,084 1 pM [3]
Estradiol (E2) Aptamer 4-MBA 0.01 pM [115]
rEPO Antibody (IgG2A) DTNB 1,335 [53]
Luteinizing hormone (LH) Antibody-functionalized magnetic AuNPs 4-ATP 1,086 0.036 IU L−1 [54]
Dopamine DNA aptamer (zipper nanodimer design) 5,5′

Dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB))
1,333 10 aM [93]
DNA aptamer Methylene blue 765; C–H in plane bending 1.50 nmol [83]
1,147; Ν(C–N)
1,391; C–H in-plane ring deformation
1,619; νring (C=C)
Cortisol (in sweat) Pseudoknot-assisted aptamer 4-MBA 1,078 33 pmol/L [44]
Erythropoietin Antibody-functionalized magnetic AuNPs 5,5-Dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) 1,335 0.0285 pg/mL [53]
Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) anti-TSH antibody Malachite green isothiocyanate (MGITC) 1,615 0.15 μIU/mL [114]
Procalcitonin (PCT) Antibody XP013 1,377 0.012 ng/mL [9]
Figure 6: 
Representative examples of SERS tag–based platforms for hormone detection. (Top left) wearable silk fibroin–based microfluidic SERS patch for noninvasive cortisol monitoring, integrating Ag nanostructures, Raman reporter molecules, and aptamer functionalization [44]. (Top right) schematic illustration of the SERS-based lateral flow immunoassay platform for the highly sensitive detection of TSH [113]. (Bottom) dual-flow lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) incorporating AuNP-based SERS tags for TSH detection [114].
Figure 6:

Representative examples of SERS tag–based platforms for hormone detection. (Top left) wearable silk fibroin–based microfluidic SERS patch for noninvasive cortisol monitoring, integrating Ag nanostructures, Raman reporter molecules, and aptamer functionalization [44]. (Top right) schematic illustration of the SERS-based lateral flow immunoassay platform for the highly sensitive detection of TSH [113]. (Bottom) dual-flow lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) incorporating AuNP-based SERS tags for TSH detection [114].

4.1 Selection Raman reporter molecules (RRM)

RRMs can directly determine sensitivity, reproducibility, and analytical robustness in hormone sensing. Key selection criteria include Raman scattering cross-section, binding affinity toward plasmonic substrates, chemical and photostability, and compatibility with biological matrices and biorecognition elements such as antibodies and aptamers [61], 116]. An ideal Raman reporter must generate intense, characteristic SERS peak (Table 4) while maintaining stable attachment to metallic nanostructures under the washing and incubation conditions typical of serum and urine-based assays [62]. Aromatic thiol compounds (e.g. 4-MBA, 4-MPBA, 4-ATP, DTNB) represent the most widely employed class due to their strong chemisorption of noble metals (Table 4). These molecules form stable Au–S or Ag–S bonds, ensuring reliable signal retention during sensing and washing steps in complex biological matrices [4], 116]. A major advantage of thiolated reporters is their ability to form well-ordered self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) on plasmonic surfaces [44]. SAM formation maximizes reporter density within localized EM hotspots, reduces variability in reporter–metal distance, and improves molecular orientation control, collectively enhancing signal intensity and reproducibility. Thiophenol derivatives are particularly attractive because of their small size, structural symmetry, and limited number of sharp Raman bands [44], 113] as shown in Table 4, which facilitates spectral interpretation and enables efficient multiplexed detection [79]. In multiplexed assays, partial overlap of reporter peaks may occur; however, Gaussian peak fitting, spectral deconvolution, and multivariate analysis allow reliable extraction of individual signatures [113]. Compared to simple thiophenols, dye-based reporters such as methylene blue (MB) and malachite green (e.g. MGITC) derivatives provide substantially higher signal intensities due to the combined EM and electronic resonance (ER) enhancement, known as surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering (SERRS) [44]. While SERRS enables ultra-low detection limits, dye molecules typically exhibit dense vibrational spectra, increasing spectral crowding and photochemical sensitivity. These limitations can nevertheless be mitigated using chemometric approaches to resolve overlapping bands. Interaction-responsive reporters offer an alternative strategy for quantitative hormone sensing. 4-MPBA is a prominent example, where boronic-acid binding to cis-diol groups induces constrained vibrational modes and characteristic peak shifts in the ∼1,075–1,085 cm−1 region, enabling frequency-based quantification with reduced dependence on hotspot intensity [3]. In contrast, 4-MBA is commonly used as an intensity-based reporter due to its strong metal–thiol binding and prominent bands near ∼1,076 and ∼1,585 cm−1, although it lacks intrinsic molecular specificity [115]. DTNB and its reduced form are extensively applied in immuno-SERS assays because of their high photostability, dual characteristic peaks, and suitability for ratiometric and multiplexed formats [53], while 4-ATP provides a large SERS cross-section with minimal photobleaching [54].

4.2 Internal/self-referencing standards

Internal/self-referencing standards in SERS are employed to improve quantitative reliability by correcting signal fluctuations arising from uneven EM or chemical enhancement, hotspot heterogeneity, and instrumental variations [117], 118]. An ideal internal standard (IS) should be chemically and spectrally stable, uniformly distributed within or on the SERS substrate, with at least one characteristic band free from analyte interference [117], 119], 120]. Common organic IS molecules include thiol or pyridine-based compounds such as 4-MPBA, 4-Mercaptobenzonitrile (4-MBN) 4,4-DP, and β-mercaptoethylamine [117], 119], which bind strongly to noble metal surfaces and provide reproducible signals. The distinct Raman bands of the embedded IS exhibit minimal spectral overlaps with SERS fingerprint of hormones, enabling straightforward ratiometric calibration without complex multivariate analysis [79]. Because the internal reference and analyte signals arise from spatially distinct plasmonic hotspots, straightforward intensity normalization or peak‐ratio analysis can be employed without the need for complex spectral deconvolution. This strategy markedly enhances the linearity and reproducibility of quantitative SERS measurements, as reflected by higher R2 values in linear fitting for hormone detection [79]. Feng et al. 2022 demonstrated the detection and quantification of multiple neurotransmitters (DA, EPI, NE, ST) using colloidal stellate NPs (Figure 7) having 4,4′-dipyridyl (4,4′-DP) as an IS embedded inside the hollow gap of stellate AuNPs, which could quantify multiple hormones in a concentration range (1 µM–10 mM) [79]. The Raman peaks for 4,4′-DP were distinct for all the four neurotransmitters enabling their unambiguous detection and quantification. Furthermore, normalization of the neurotransmitter Raman signals using the 4,4′-DP reference markedly enhanced the linearity of the calibration curves for all four neurotransmitters as shown in Figure 7d.

Figure 7: 
SERS-based quantification of neurotransmitters. (a) Schematic illustration of the strategy for SERS detection. (b) SERS spectra of four neurotransmitters and a blank incubated with stellate AuNPs with internal reference 4,4′-DP. (c) SERS spectra of DA with different concentrations (from 1 μM to 10 mM). (d–g) plots of Raman intensity of neurotransmitters versus their concentrations: (d) DA, (e) epinephrine, (f) serotonin, (g) norepinephrine. Bottom plots are extracted directly from the raw data, whereas top plots are results after calibration by reference signals. The error bars show the standard deviation from 10 measurements with different concentrations. Laser wavelength: 785 nm [79].
Figure 7:

SERS-based quantification of neurotransmitters. (a) Schematic illustration of the strategy for SERS detection. (b) SERS spectra of four neurotransmitters and a blank incubated with stellate AuNPs with internal reference 4,4′-DP. (c) SERS spectra of DA with different concentrations (from 1 μM to 10 mM). (d–g) plots of Raman intensity of neurotransmitters versus their concentrations: (d) DA, (e) epinephrine, (f) serotonin, (g) norepinephrine. Bottom plots are extracted directly from the raw data, whereas top plots are results after calibration by reference signals. The error bars show the standard deviation from 10 measurements with different concentrations. Laser wavelength: 785 nm [79].

5 Clinical significance of SERS based hormone sensing

Hormone detection should be quick and precise to diagnose and manage a variety of health issues, including endocrine diseases, mental illnesses and metabolic syndromes. The advent of noble metal NPs, nanocomposites and their combinations as SERS active substrates has opened a new avenue in hormone detection and quantification by enabling label-free, ultrasensitive, POC and real-time molecular analysis in physiologically relevant fluids. Though SERS is not yet clinically approved diagnostic tool, looking at the current advancements and the anticipated future efforts would further strengthen the technique for hormone sensing. For luteinizing hormone (LH), a passive microfluidic immunoassay employing 4-ATP labeled AuNPs achieved rapid detection in serum with a detection limit of 0.036 IU/L, can potentially eliminate the need for a specialized laboratory [54]. In the case of insulin, a series of SERS studies demonstrated its detection at ultralow concentrations in pancreatic islet secretions, serum, and aqueous solutions. Label-free 3D AuNPs sensors quantified insulin secretion dynamics under glucose stimulation with detection reaching up to 35 pM [25], while AgNPs based microdisk electrodes achieved serum insulin detection with limits of 70 pg/mL [1]. The reported detection limits are sufficient to monitor the physiological concentrations of Insulin [121]. Besides, SERS also help in identifying insulin isomer conformational differences [65] and monitored time- and pH-dependent structural changes associated with amyloid aggregation [85], 94] highlighting the application of SERS in drug safety and functional efficacy monitoring. Clinically, this aids in quality control and preventing aggregation-related complications. Cortisol, a key biomarker for stress, has been detected across multiple platforms, including flexible and wearable formats. Skin-mounted sensors using silver triangle nanoplates on PVC/SEBS films demonstrated high sensitivity with detection limits around 5.5 × 10−8 M [45]. A silk fibroin-based SERS patch combined aptamer-based specificity with pH calibration for dynamic sweat cortisol monitoring [44], while a lateral-flow paper-based sensor enabled detection in saliva with minimal matrix interference. Additionally, molecularly imprinted polymers and Ag@Au nanostructures provided robust cortisol detection in saliva down to 10 pM [2]. Such ultrasensitive detection could enable non-invasive, real-time cortisol monitoring in sweat and saliva, crucial for assessing stress and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis disorders [70]. Wearable, portable and paper-based platforms offer POC convenience and minimal discomfort, enhancing accessibility. Their high sensitivity supports early detection of conditions like Cushing’s, Addison’s disease, and chronic stress [122]. However, flexible/wearable substrates often suffer from mechanical deformation, sample induced corrosion, and long-term signal drift, while nanofabrication inconsistencies lead to hotspot heterogeneity and poor inter-device reproducibility [123]. Their field deployment is further complicated by the lack of robust on-site calibration strategies to correct laser power fluctuations, substrate aging, and matrix effects [44], 45], 73]. Addressing these problems requires well-defined internal IS materials [62], 79], batch-level quality control workflows, and unified data formats with metadata on substrates, acquisition parameters, and signal preprocessing to ensure cross-study comparability and translational reliability [123]. Further, the matrix effects remain key challenge in SERS-based hormone sensing because proteins, salts, metabolites, and pH variations regulate nonspecific adsorption, hotspot accessibility, and background noise across biofluids [49], 54]. In plasma and serum, high protein content leads to signal suppression and cross-reactivity, which has been effectively mitigated using immunomagnetic capture and microfluidic compartmentalization [49], 54]. Saliva presents lower protein interference but variable viscosity and contaminants, necessitating simple pretreatment and standard-addition calibration to ensure reliable recovery, as reported in [2]. Sweat-based wearable SERS sensing is further complicated by low analyte concentrations, high ionic strength, fluctuating pH, and mechanical deformation; microfluidic sweat collection, aptamer or competitive immunoassays, and matrix-matched calibration improve selectivity and recovery [44], 45], 73], 88].

Further, the LOD and linear dynamic ranges reported for SERS-based hormones sensing are not directly comparable across studies because of multiple interdependent factors as demonstrated by Moody et al., who evaluated the detection of seven neurotransmitters on Au and Ag nanoparticles using 532, 633, and 785 nm excitation [4] Aromatic and indole-containing molecules such as melatonin, serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine achieved lower LODs (sub-nM to low µM) due to strong π-interactions with metal surfaces, particularly on AuNPs at 785 nm where optimal overlap with Au LSPR and reduced fluorescence background maximized enhancement [124]. In contrast, amino-acid neurotransmitters lacking extended aromatic systems (glutamate and GABA) showed weak enhancement on AuNPs but significantly improved sensitivity on AgNPs at 633 nm, reaching sub-µM to nM LODs through stronger carboxylate and amine coordination with silver [125]. Despite similar average enhancement factors (∼105–106) for Au and Ag colloids, molecule-specific adsorption and orientation led to large practical differences in LODs, underscoring that sensitivity arises from the interplay of surface chemistry, hotspot accessibility, and excitation conditions rather than EF alone [4]. These issues are amplified in complex biofluids, where proteins and salts further reduce effective hotspot occupation and elevate background, resulting in higher practical LODs [77], 82], 126]. Consequently, intensity-based methods become highly sensitive to hotspot heterogeneity. In such case reference-assisted or peak-shift-based approaches improve detection robustness but may report higher nominal LODs and linear dynamic rages [3], 79].

6 Conclusions

The rapid advancements in the field of SERS-active NPs have notably changed the way of hormone sensing. SERS-active NPs have enabled detection of several clinically important hormones at extremely low concentrations, sometimes as low as attomole which in turn facilitated the faster and accurate detection of hormones even in smaller volumes of complex biological matrices such as sweat, saliva, blood, cells and cell lysate. Also, the advancements in the design of plasmonic NPs have not only facilitated developing the sensitive hormone sensors, but also portable, wearable and ready-for real world applications. Wearable patches made of silk or flexible polymers have been used to check cortisol levels during exercise or in stressful situations, providing a look into totally individualized, real-time health monitoring. Most importantly, label-free SERS based sensors not only help in just quantitative detection of the hormones but also help in assessing the structural dynamics of the peptide hormones like insulin offering important insights into stability and therapeutic effectiveness. In neurology and psychiatry, SERS systems have demonstrated the sensitive and selective detection of neurotransmitters (DA, EPI, and NE) with a high specificity, indicating their diagnostic capabilities. The integration of SERS active substrates into POC devices and smart wearables foreshadows the future of in situ hormone monitoring. Further, studies have primarily focused on the SERS-based detection of insulin, cortisol, and various catecholamines; however, substantial opportunities remain to expand SERS investigations to a broader range of hormones, which is essential for enhancing its clinical relevance.


Corresponding authors: Ram Prasad, Department of Botany, Mahatma Gandhi Central University, Motihari, 845401, Bihar, India, E-mail: ; Surya Pratap Singh, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Dharwad, Dharwad, 580011, Karnataka, India, E-mail:

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

1. Yagati, AK, Choi, Y, Park, J, Choi, JW, Jun, HS, Cho, S. Silver nanoflower–reduced graphene oxide composite based micro-disk electrode for insulin detection in serum. Biosens Bioelectron 2016;80:307–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.086.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Peng, Y, Zhang, X, Wang, C, Peng, X, Huo, J, Pang, K, et al.. Ultrasensitive cortisol detection using Ag@Au SERS sensor with molecularly imprinted polymers. Sens Actuators B Chem 2025;442:138034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2025.138034.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Choi, Y, Jeon, CS, Kim, KB, Kim, HJ, Pyun, SH, Park, YM. Quantitative detection of dopamine in human serum with surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) of constrained vibrational mode. Talanta 2023;260:124590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124590.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Moody, AS, Sharma, B. Multi-metal, multi-wavelength surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy detection of neurotransmitters. ACS Chem Neurosci 2018;9:1380–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00020.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Dolui, S, Maity, A, Kundu, S, Nanda, B, Roy, A, Mondal, A, et al.. Stabilization of α-helical folded structures retards hydrophobic zipping and fibrillation of bovine insulin: a key signature from Raman spectroscopic analysis. J Phys Chem B 2025;129:4320–34. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c00846.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. De Leon Portilla, P, González, AL, Sanchez-Mora, E. Thyroxine quantification by using plasmonic nanoparticles as SERS substrates. Chemosensors 2023;11:516. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11100516.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Oduwole, OO, Huhtaniemi, IT, Misrahi, M. The roles of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone in spermatogenesis and folliculogenesis revisited. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:12735. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312735.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Selimoğlu, F, Ayhan, ME. Silver nanoparticle decorated graphene-based SERS electrode towards procalcitonin detection. Vib Spectrosc 2023;126:103539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2023.103539.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Zhang, Y, Wang, X, Li, G, Zhao, G, Guan, M. Quantitative detection of procalcitonin with high sensitivity, specificity and speed based on SERS magnetic immunoassay. ChemistrySelect 2024;9:e202304366. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202304366.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Lee, SY, Pearce, EN. Testing, monitoring, and treatment of thyroid dysfunction in pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021;106:883–92. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa945.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Glintborg, D, T’Sjoen, G, Ravn, P, Andersen, MS. Management of endocrine disease: optimal feminizing hormone treatment in transgender people. Eur J Endocrinol 2021;185:R49–63. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0059.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Bakhshi, P, Ho, JQ, Zanganeh, S. Sex-specific outcomes in cancer therapy: the central role of hormones. Front Med Technol 2024;6:1320690. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2024.1320690.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Taverna, C, Fasolato, C, Brasili, F, Ripanti, F, Rizza, C, De Marcellis, A, et al.. Probing the effect of the molecular interface of gold nanoparticles on the disassembly of insulin amyloid fibrils. Int J Biol Macromol 2025;306:141735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.141735.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. López-Tobar, E, Hernández, B, Gómez, J, Chenal, A, Garcia-Ramos, JV, Ghomi, M, et al.. Anchoring sites of fibrillogenic peptide hormone somatostatin-14 on plasmonic nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 2015;119:8273–9.10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00485Suche in Google Scholar

15. K․A․, EJ, N․K․, M, Velayutham, J, Manickam, P, Palanisamy, T. Vertical array of surface-enhanced Raman scattering hotspots: development and application for label-free progesterone detection. Mater Res Bull 2025;187:113371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2025.113371.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Nan, M, Darmawan, BA, Go, G, Zheng, S, Lee, J, Kim, S, et al.. Wearable localized surface plasmon resonance-based biosensor with highly sensitive and direct detection of cortisol in human sweat. Biosens 2023;13:184. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020184.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Ghoshal, K. Recent advances in biosensing technologies for detecting hormones. In: Advanced sensor technology. Elsevier; 2023:261–95 pp.10.1016/B978-0-323-90222-9.00012-1Suche in Google Scholar

18. Gravitte, A, Archibald, T, Cobble, A, Kennard, B, Brown, S. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry applications for quantification of endogenous sex hormones. Biomed Chromatogr 2021;35:e5036. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.5036.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Khelifa, L, Hu, Y, Jiang, N, Yetisen, AK. Lateral flow assays for hormone detection. Lab Chip 2022;22:2451–75. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1lc00960e.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Mukunda, DC, Rodrigues, J, Joshi, VK, Raghushaker, CR, Mahato, KK. A comprehensive review on LED-induced fluorescence in diagnostic pathology. Biosens Bioelectron 2022;209:114230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2022.114230.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Zhang, A, Neumeyer, JL, Baldessarini, RJ. Recent progress in development of dopamine receptor subtype-selective agents: potential therapeutics for neurological and psychiatric disorders. Chem Rev 2007;107:274–302. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050263h.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Ji, X, Palui, G, Avellini, T, Na, HB, Yi, C, Knappenberger, KL, et al.. On the pH-Dependent quenching of quantum dot photoluminescence by redox active dopamine. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:6006–17. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja300724x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Lotharius, J, Brundin, P. Pathogenesis of parkinson’s disease: dopamine, vesicles and α-synuclein. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002;3:932–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn983.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Fonteh, AN, Harrington, RJ, Tsai, A, Liao, P, Harrington, MG. Free amino acid and dipeptide changes in the body fluids from Alzheimer’s disease subjects. Amino Acids 2007;32:213–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-006-0409-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Cho, H, Kumar, S, Yang, D, Vaidyanathan, S, Woo, K, Garcia, I, et al.. Surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy-based label-free insulin detection at physiological concentrations for analysis of islet performance. ACS Sens 2018;3:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00864.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Cao, X, Qin, M, Li, P, Zhou, B, Tang, X, Ge, M, et al.. Probing catecholamine neurotransmitters based on iron-coordination surface-enhanced resonance Raman spectroscopy label. Sens Actuators B Chem 2018;268:350–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.04.117.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Yao, Y, Shen, R, Xu, J, Feng, Z. Progress in electrochemical sensing of epinephrine using carbon nanomaterials: a review. Int J Electrochem Sci 2024;19:100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoes.2024.100750.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Zhou, B, Li, X, Tang, X, Li, P, Yang, L, Liu, J. Highly selective and repeatable surface-enhanced resonance raman scattering detection for epinephrine in serum based on interface self-assembled 2D nanoparticles arrays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017;9:7772–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b15205.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Dowek, A, Berge, M, Prognon, P, Legrand, FX, Larquet, E, Tfayli, A, et al.. Discriminative and quantitative analysis of norepinephrine and epinephrine by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy with gold nanoparticle suspensions. Anal Bioanal Chem 2022;414:1163–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03743-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Dowek, A, Voisin, F, Le, L, Tan, C, Mallet, JM, Carn, F, et al.. Self-assembly of gold nanoparticles by chitosan for improved epinephrine detection using a portable surface enhanced Raman scattering device. Talanta 2023;251:123752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123752.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Bailey, MR, Martin, RS, Schultz, ZD. Role of surface adsorption in the surface-enhanced raman scattering and electrochemical detection of neurotransmitters. J Phys Chem C 2016;120:20624–33. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01196.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Morilak, DA, Barrera, G, Echevarria, DJ, Garcia, AS, Hernandez, A, Ma, S, et al.. Role of brain norepinephrine in the behavioral response to stress. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2005;29:1214–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.08.007.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Singh, D, Bharti, A, Mathur, A. Thyroxine biosensors: a review on progress and challenges. Bioanalysis 2023;15:1259–70. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2023-0106.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Singh, D, Roy, S, Mahindroo, N, Mathur, A. Design and development of an electroanalytical sensor based on molecularly imprinted polyaniline for the detection of thyroxine. J Appl Electrochem 2024;54:147–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-023-01949-1.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Fleming, GD, Koch, R, Perez, JM, Cabrera, JL. Raman and SERS study of N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine, melatonin – the influence of the different molecular fragments on the SERS effect. Vib Spectrosc 2015;80:70–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2015.08.002.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Sun, W, Xu, Q, Sun, J, Lin, X, Pan, H. Design and development of biosensors for progesterone detection. J Sens 2023;2023:4803143. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4803143.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Boza, A, Api, M, Kayatas, S, Ceyhan, M, Boza, B. Is progestogen supplementation necessary to prevent abortion? J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore) 2016;36:1076–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2016.1205556.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Wang, X, Luo, Q, Bai, W. Efficacy of progesterone on threatened miscarriage: difference in drug types. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2019;45:794–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13909.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Hughes, GC. Progesterone and autoimmune disease. Autoimmun Rev 2012;11:A502–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2011.12.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Shea, JL, Wong, PY, Chen, Y. Free testosterone: clinical utility and important analytical aspects of measurement. Adv Clin Chem 2014;63:59–84.10.1016/B978-0-12-800094-6.00002-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

41. McBride, J, Carson, C, Coward, R. Diagnosis and management of testosterone deficiency. Asian J Androl 2015;17:177. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682x.143317.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Vesper, HW, Botelho, JC. Standardization of testosterone measurements in humans. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2010;121:513–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.03.032.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Ondieki, AM, Birech, Z, Kaduki, KA, Mwangi, PW, Juma, M, Chege, BM. Chemometrics-aided surface-enhanced Raman spectrometric detection and quantification of GH and TE hormones in blood. PLoS One 2025;20:e0323697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323697.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Hu, M, Zhu, K, Wei, J, Xu, Z, Yang, K, Wu, L, et al.. Wearable microfluidic SERS patch based on silk fibroin for the non-invasive monitoring of sweat cortisol and pH. Sens Actuators B Chem 2025;427:137152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2024.137152.Suche in Google Scholar

45. Weng, G, Yang, J, Li, J, Zhu, J, Zhao, J. Ag triangle nanoplates assembled on PVC/SEBS membrane as flexible SERS substrates for skin cortisol sensing. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2023;303:123154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2023.123154.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Katsu, Y, Baker, ME. Cortisol. In: Handbook of Hormones. Elsevier; 2021:947–9 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-820649-2.00261-8Suche in Google Scholar

47. Yu, W, Xu, X, Zheng, T. Flower-like GO-MoS2 SERS platform for sensitive quantification of cortisol. Moore More 2025;2:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44275-024-00024-x.Suche in Google Scholar

48. Meraj, L, Mehmood, N, Majeed, MI, Nawaz, H, Rashid, N, Fatima, R, et al.. Characterization of structural changes occurring in insulin at different time intervals at room temperature by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2023;44:103796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103796.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Agoston, R, Izake, EL, Sivanesan, A, Lott, WB, Sillence, M, Steel, R. Rapid isolation and detection of erythropoietin in blood plasma by magnetic core gold nanoparticles and portable Raman spectroscopy. Nanomedicine 2016;12:633–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2015.11.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Kaushik, A, Singh, J, Soni, R, Singh, JP. MoS 2 –Ag nanocomposite-based SERS substrates with an ultralow detection limit. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2023;6:9236–46. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c00813.Suche in Google Scholar

51. Khalil, I, Chou, CM, Tsai, KL, Hsu, S, Yehye, WA, Hsiao, VKS. Gold nanofilm-coated porous silicon as surface-enhanced raman scattering substrate. Appl Sci 2019;9:4806. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9224806.Suche in Google Scholar

52. Hassanain, WA, Theiss, FL, Izake, EL. Label-free identification of erythropoietin isoforms by surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Talanta 2022;236:122879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122879.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Selbes, YS, Caglayan, MG, Eryilmaz, M, Boyaci, IH, Saglam, N, Basaran, AA, et al.. Surface-enhanced Raman probe for rapid nanoextraction and detection of erythropoietin in urine. Anal Bioanal Chem 2016;408:8447–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9966-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Gjergjizi, B, Çoğun, F, Yıldırım, E, Eryılmaz, M, Selbes, Y, Sağlam, N, et al.. SERS-based ultrafast and sensitive detection of luteinizing hormone in human serum using a passive microchip. Sens Actuators B Chem 2018;269:314–21.10.1016/j.snb.2018.05.001Suche in Google Scholar

55. Wang, HQ, Zhang, WD, Yuan, B, Zhang, JB. Advances in the regulation of mammalian follicle-stimulating hormone secretion. Animals 2021;11:1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041134.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

56. Fatemi, H, Bilger, W, Denis, D, Griesinger, G, La Marca, A, Longobardi, S, et al.. Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007–2017). Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2021;19:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00744-x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

57. Kraemer, WJ, Ratamess, NA, Hymer, WC, Nindl, BC, Fragala, MS. Growth hormone(s), testosterone, insulin-like growth factors, and cortisol: roles and integration for cellular development and growth with exercise. Front Endocrinol 2020;11:33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00033.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

58. Fleischmann, M, Hendra, PJ, McQuillan, AJ. Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode. Chem Phys Lett 1974;26:163–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(74)85388-1.Suche in Google Scholar

59. Albrecht, MG, Creighton, JA. Anomalously intense Raman spectra of pyridine at a silver electrode. J Am Chem Soc 1977;99:5215–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00457a071.Suche in Google Scholar

60. Jeanmaire, DL, Van Duyne, RP. Surface raman spectroelectrochemistry. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 1977;84:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0728(77)80224-6.Suche in Google Scholar

61. Ma, H, Pan, SQ, Wang, WL, Yue, X, Xi, XH, Yan, S, et al.. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: current understanding, challenges, and opportunities. ACS Nano 2024;18:14000–19. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c02670.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

62. Yuan, K, Jurado-Sánchez, B, Escarpa, A. Nanomaterials meet surface-enhanced Raman scattering towards enhanced clinical diagnosis: a review. J Nanobiotechnol 2022;20:537. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01711-3.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

63. Pagano, R, Syrgiannis, Z, Bettini, S, Ingrosso, C, Valli, L, Giancane, G, et al.. Localized and surface plasmons coupling for ultrasensitive dopamine detection by means of SPR‐Based perylene bisimide/Au nanostructures thin film. Adv Mater Interfac 2021;8:2101023. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202101023.Suche in Google Scholar

64. Kaya, M, Volkan, M. New approach for the surface enhanced resonance Raman scattering (SERRS) detection of dopamine at picomolar (pM) levels in the presence of ascorbic acid. Anal Chem. 2012;84:7729–35. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac3010428.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

65. Drachev, VP, Thoreson, MD, Khaliullin, EN, Davisson, VJ, Shalaev, VM. Surface-enhanced raman difference between human insulin and insulin lispro detected with adaptive nanostructures. J Phys Chem B 2004;108:18046–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp047254h.Suche in Google Scholar

66. Grass, S, Treuel, L. Mechanistic aspects of protein corona formation: insulin adsorption onto gold nanoparticle surfaces. J Nanoparticle Res 2014;16:2254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2254-0.Suche in Google Scholar

67. Juang, RS, Cheng, YW, Chen, WT, Wang, KS, Fu, CC, Liu, SH, et al.. Silver nanoparticles embedded on mesoporous-silica modified reduced graphene-oxide nanosheets for SERS detection of uremic toxins and parathyroid hormone. Appl Surf Sci 2020;521:146372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146372.Suche in Google Scholar

68. Zhang, H, Wang, R, Sikdar, D, Wu, L, Sun, J, Gu, N, et al.. Plasmonic superlattice membranes based on bimetallic nano-sea urchins as high-performance label-free surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy platforms. ACS Sens 2022;7:622–31. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c02556.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

69. Li, J, Li, Y, Li, P, Zhang, Y, Du, L, Wang, Y, et al.. Exosome detection via surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for cancer diagnosis. Acta Biomater 2022;144:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.03.036.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

70. Agarwal, DK, Xia, J, Sadeqi, A, Owyeung, R, Nejad, HR, Sonkusale, S. A cost-effective paper-based SERS device for the detection of cortisol in saliva. In: 2021 21st International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers): IEEE; 2021. 719–22 pp.10.1109/Transducers50396.2021.9495649Suche in Google Scholar

71. Ansah, IB, Lee, WC, Mun, C, Rha, JJ, Jung, HS, Kang, M, et al.. In situ electrochemical surface modification of Au electrodes for simultaneous label-free SERS detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid. Sens Actuators B Chem 2022;353:131196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.131196.Suche in Google Scholar

72. Niihori, M, Földes, T, Readman, CA, Arul, R, Grys, D, Nijs, Bde, et al.. SERS sensing of dopamine with Fe(III)‐Sensitized nanogaps in recleanable AuNP monolayer films. Small 2023;19.10.1002/smll.202302531Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

73. Xiong, S, Zhu, C, Wang, C, Dong, P, Wu, X. SERS-based pump-free microfluidic chip sensor for highly sensitive competitive immunoassay of cortisol in human sweat. Lab Chip 2024;24:5384–97. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4lc00858h.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

74. Zheng, P, Raj, P, Wu, L, Mizutani, T, Szabo, M, Hanson, WA, et al.. Quantitative detection of thyroid‐stimulating hormone in patient samples with a nanomechanical single‐antibody spectro‐immunoassay. Small 2024;20:2305110. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202305110.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

75. Le Ru, EC, Auguié, B. Enhancement factors: a central concept during 50 years of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. ACS Nano 2024;18:9773–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c01474.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

76. Han, XX, Rodriguez, RS, Haynes, CL, Ozaki, Y, Zhao, B. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2022;1:87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00083-6.Suche in Google Scholar

77. Gwon, Y, Kim, JH, Lee, SW. Quantification of plasma dopamine in depressed patients using silver-enriched silicon nanowires as SERS-active substrates. ACS Sens 2024;9:870–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.3c02202.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

78. Vo, VT, Phung, VD, Lee, SW. Nanosilver-embedded silicon nanowires as a SERS-active substrate for the ultrasensitive detection of monoamine neurotransmitters. Surf Interfaces 2021;25:101181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101181.Suche in Google Scholar

79. Feng, L, Li, C, Wang, L, Li, J, Liu, X, Li, Q, et al.. Self-referenced surface-enhanced raman scattering nanosubstrate for the quantitative detection of neurotransmitters. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2022;5:2403–10. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.2c00272.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

80. Lin, X, Lei, F, Liang, X, Jiao, Y, Zhao, X, Li, Z, et al.. Quantitative detection of trace nanoplastics (down to 50 nm) via surface-enhanced Raman scattering based on the multiplex-feature coffee ring. Opto-Electronic Adv 2025;8:240260. https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2025.240260.Suche in Google Scholar

81. Wu, Y, Sun, T, Shao, M, Ji, C, Li, C, Zhang, C, et al.. Pyroelectrically driven charge transfer and its advantages on SERS and self‐cleaning property. Laser Photon Rev 2025;19:2401152. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202401152.Suche in Google Scholar

82. Moore, TJ, Sharma, B. Direct surface enhanced Raman spectroscopic detection of cortisol at physiological concentrations. Anal Chem. 2020;92:2052–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04532.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

83. Lu, L, Zhou, Y, Zheng, T, Tian, Y. SERS and EC dual-mode detection for dopamine based on WO3-SnO2 nanoflake arrays. Nano Res 2023;16:4049–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4984-0.Suche in Google Scholar

84. Wang, R, Wei, Y, Li, G, Chen, S, Lin, J, Hao, Q, et al.. Beyond plasmonics: atomic-scale SERS platforms for plasmon‐free photocatalysis monitoring via charge transfer mechanisms. Adv Sens Res 2025;4:e00054. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsr.202500054.Suche in Google Scholar

85. Kurouski, D, Sorci, M, Postiglione, T, Belfort, G, Lednev, IK. Detection and structural characterization of insulin prefibrilar oligomers using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Biotechnol Prog 2014;30:488–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.1852.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

86. Badillo-Ramírez, I, Saniger, JM, Popp, J, Cialla-May, D. SERS characterization of dopamine and in situ dopamine polymerization on silver nanoparticles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2021;23:12158–70.10.1039/D1CP00966DSuche in Google Scholar

87. Shi, J, Li, J, Liang, A, Jiang, Z. Highly catalysis MOFCe supported Ag nanoclusters coupled with specific aptamer for SERS quantitative assay of trace dopamine. Talanta 2022;245:123468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123468.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

88. Li, C, Hu, J, Hu, N, Zhao, J, Li, Q, Han, Y, et al.. Aptamer-aided plasmonic nano-urchins for reporter-free surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy analysis of cortisol. Anal Methods 2024;16:3067–73. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ay00401a.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

89. Ren, X, Zhang, Q, Yang, J, Zhang, X, Zhang, X, Zhang, Y, et al.. Dopamine imaging in living cells and retina by surface-enhanced raman scattering based on functionalized gold nanoparticles. Anal Chem 2021;93:10841–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01108.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

90. Park, JO, Choi, Y, Ahn, HM, Lee, CK, Chun, H, Park, YM, et al.. Aggregation of Ag nanoparticle based on surface acoustic wave for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy detection of dopamine. Anal Chim Acta 2024;1285:342036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2023.342036.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

91. Michałowska, A, Jędrzejewski, K, Kudelski, A. Influence of the Co-adsorbed ions on the surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectra of dopamine adsorbed on nanostructured silver. Materials 2022;15:5972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175972.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

92. Sui, H, Wang, Y, Zhang, X, Wang, X, Cheng, W, Su, H, et al.. Ultrasensitive detection of thyrotropin-releasing hormone based on azo coupling and surface-enhanced resonance Raman spectroscopy. Analyst 2016;141:5181–8. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6an00884d.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

93. Li, L, Lu, Y, Qian, Z, Yang, Z, Yang, K, Zong, S, et al.. Ultra-sensitive surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy sensor for in-situ monitoring of dopamine release using zipper-like ortho-nanodimers. Biosens Bioelectron 2021;180:113100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113100.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

94. Darussalam, EY, Peterfi, O, Deckert-Gaudig, T, Roussille, L, Deckert, V. pH-dependent disintegration of insulin amyloid fibrils monitored with atomic force microscopy and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2021;256:119672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2021.119672.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

95. Fan, L, Wang, Z, Zhang, Y, Song, Y, Yang, H, Wang, F. Molecularly imprinted monolithic column-based SERS sensor for selective detection of cortisol in dog saliva. Talanta 2022;249:123609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123609.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

96. Muntean, CM, Cuibus, D, Boca, S, Falamas, A, Tosa, N, Brezeştean, IA, et al.. Gold vs. silver colloidal nanoparticle films for optimized SERS detection of propranolol and Electrochemical-SERS analyses. Biosens 2023;13:530. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050530.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

97. Zeman, EJ, Schatz, GC. An accurate electromagnetic theory study of surface enhancement factors for silver, gold, copper, lithium, sodium, aluminum, gallium, indium, zinc, and cadmium. J Phys Chem 1987;91:634–43. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100287a028.Suche in Google Scholar

98. Le, TV, Park, JS, Lee, SW. Synchronous Fe3+ -Enhanced colorimetric and liquid SERS-based detection of dopamine using core–shell plasmonic nanoparticles. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2023;6:6726–38. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c00454.Suche in Google Scholar

99. Yılmaz, GE, Saylan, Y, Göktürk, I, Yılmaz, F, Denizli, A. Selective amplification of plasmonic sensor signal for cortisol detection using gold nanoparticles. Biosens 2022;12:482. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12070482.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

100. Rebelo, P, Seguro, I, Nouws, HPA, Delerue-Matos, C, Pacheco, JG. Molecularly imprinted plasmonic sensors for the determination of environmental water contaminants: a review. Chemosensors 2023;11:318. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11060318.Suche in Google Scholar

101. Hussain, A, Sun, DW, Pu, H. Bimetallic core shelled nanoparticles (Au@AgNPs) for rapid detection of thiram and dicyandiamide contaminants in liquid milk using SERS. Food Chem 2020;317:126429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126429.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

102. Sivanesan, A, Witkowska, E, Adamkiewicz, W, Dziewit, Ł, Kamińska, A, Waluk, J. Nanostructured silver–gold bimetallic SERS substrates for selective identification of bacteria in human blood. Analyst 2014;139:1037. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3an01924a.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

103. Pu, H, Xie, X, Sun, DW, Wei, Q, Jiang, Y. Double strand DNA functionalized Au@Ag Nps for ultrasensitive detection of 17β-estradiol using surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy. Talanta 2019;195:419–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.10.021.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

104. Lai, H, Zhang, H, Li, G, Hu, Y. Bimetallic AgNPs@dopamine modified-halloysite nanotubes-AuNPs for adenine determination using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Microchim Acta 2021;188:127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-021-04778-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

105. Zhu, A, Wang, T, Jiang, Y, Hu, S, Tang, W, Liu, X, et al.. SERS determination of dopamine using metal–organic frameworks decorated with Ag/Au noble metal nanoparticle composite after azo derivatization with p-aminothiophenol. Microchim Acta 2022;189:207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-022-05292-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

106. Karlo, J, Razi, SS, Phaneeswar, MS, Vijay, A, Singh, SP. Metallic nanoparticles for surface-enhanced raman scattering based biosensing applications. Photochem 2024;4:417–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem4040026.Suche in Google Scholar

107. Yang, C, Liang, P, Tang, L, Zhou, Y, Cao, Y, Wu, Y, et al.. Synergistic effects of semiconductor substrate and noble metal nano-particles on SERS effect both theoretical and experimental aspects. Appl Surf Sci 2018;436:367–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.074.Suche in Google Scholar

108. Feng, X, Liu, Z, Zhang, G, Zhang, S, Huang, S, He, Z, et al.. Natural graphene plasmonic nano‐resonators for highly active surface‐enhanced raman scattering platforms. Energy Environ Mater 2023;6:e12394. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12394.Suche in Google Scholar

109. Sun, Y, Yang, X, Zhao, H, Wang, R. Non-symmetric hybrids of noble metal-semiconductor: interplay of nanoparticles and nanostructures in formation dynamics and plasmonic applications. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 2017;27:157–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2017.03.006.Suche in Google Scholar

110. Li, Y, Wang, Z, Mu, X, Ma, A, Guo, S. Raman tags: novel optical probes for intracellular sensing and imaging. Biotechnol Adv 2017;35:168–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

111. Fu, X, Cheng, Z, Yu, J, Choo, P, Chen, L, Choo, J. A SERS-based lateral flow assay biosensor for highly sensitive detection of HIV-1 DNA. Biosens Bioelectron 2016;78:530–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.11.099.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

112. Hwang, J, Lee, S, Choo, J. Application of a SERS-based lateral flow immunoassay strip for the rapid and sensitive detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Nanoscale 2016;8:11418–25. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr07243c.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

113. Choi, S, Hwang, J, Lee, S, Lim, DW, Joo, H, Choo, J. Quantitative analysis of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) using SERS-based lateral flow immunoassay. Sens Actuators B Chem 2017;240:358–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.178.Suche in Google Scholar

114. Kim, K, Han, DK, Choi, N, Kim, SH, Joung, Y, Kim, K, et al.. Surface-enhanced raman scattering-based dual-flow lateral flow assay sensor for the ultrasensitive detection of the thyroid-stimulating hormone. Anal Chem 2021;93:6673–81. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05336.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

115. Hao, X, Guan, Y, Liu, F, Zhang, Y, Zhai, Y, Niu, L. Ultrasensitive detection and application of estradiol based on nucleic acid aptamer and circulating amplification technology. J Electroanal Chem 2022;913:116284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116284.Suche in Google Scholar

116. Smolsky, J, Kaur, S, Hayashi, C, Batra, S, Krasnoslobodtsev, A. Surface-enhanced raman scattering-based immunoassay technologies for detection of disease biomarkers. Biosens 2017;7:7. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios7010007.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

117. Shen, W, Lin, X, Jiang, C, Li, C, Lin, H, Huang, J, et al.. Reliable quantitative SERS analysis facilitated by core–shell nanoparticles with embedded internal standards. Angew Chem Int Ed 2015;54:7308–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201502171.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

118. Lorén, A, Engelbrektsson, J, Eliasson, C, Josefson, M, Abrahamsson, J, Johansson, M, et al.. Internal standard in surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem 2004;76:7391–5.10.1021/ac0491298Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

119. Mei, R, Wang, Y, Yu, Q, Yin, Y, Zhao, R, Chen, L. Gold nanorod array-bridged internal-standard SERS tags: from ultrasensitivity to multifunctionality. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2020;12:2059–66. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b18292.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

120. Zou, Y, Chen, L, Song, Z, Ding, D, Chen, Y, Xu, Y, et al.. Stable and unique graphitic Raman internal standard nanocapsules for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy quantitative analysis. Nano Res 2016;9:1418–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-016-1037-6.Suche in Google Scholar

121. Insulinoma. Clinical Veterinary Advisor. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier; 2013:469–71 pp.10.1016/B978-1-4160-3969-3.00217-1Suche in Google Scholar

122. Bugălă, NM, Carsote, M, Stoica, LE, Albulescu, DM, Ţuculină, MJ, Preda, SA, et al.. New approach to Addison disease: oral manifestations due to endocrine dysfunction and comorbidity burden. Diagnostics 2022;12:2080. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092080.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

123. Durai, L, Gopalakrishnan, A, Vishnu, N. Existing and emerging point-of-care devices for neurotransmitter detection. In: . Future Approaches to Electrochemical Sensing of Neurotransmitters. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2025:228–54 pp.10.1039/9781837675593-00228Suche in Google Scholar

124. Kneipp, K, Dasari, RR, Wang, Y. Near-infrared surface-enhanced raman scattering (NIR SERS) on colloidal silver and gold. Appl Spectrosc 1994;48:951–5. https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702944029776.Suche in Google Scholar

125. Podstawka, E, Ozaki, Y, Proniewicz, LM. Part III: surface-enhanced raman scattering of amino acids and their homodipeptide monolayers deposited onto colloidal gold surface. Appl Spectrosc 2005;59:1516–26. https://doi.org/10.1366/000370205775142520.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

126. Chen, WH, Wang, W, Lin, Q, Grys, DB, Niihori, M, Huang, J, et al.. Plasmonic sensing assay for long-term monitoring (PSALM) of neurotransmitters in urine. ACS Nanosci Au 2023;3:161–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.2c00048.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2025-08-26
Accepted: 2026-01-28
Published Online: 2026-03-06

© 2026 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Green fabrication of γ- Al2O3 bionanomaterials using Coriandrum sativum plant extract and its photocatalytic and antibacterial activity
  2. Review Articles
  3. Integrating spatial analysis in the study of silver nanoparticles for radiotherapy: from molecular mechanisms to bio distribution in biological systems
  4. Review of thermal conductivity of gold nanoparticle composites
  5. Nanogenerators for energy harvesting: a holistic review of mechanisms, materials, and emerging applications
  6. Nanoparticles as SERS substrates: recent progress in hormone sensing
  7. Defected graphene oxide and applications in cement-based materials
  8. A comprehensive review of nanotechnology based drug delivery systems for osteoarthritis treatment
  9. Research Articles
  10. Dual nanofiller strategy for enhanced mechanical properties in carbon fiber reinforced polyamide blends
  11. Green synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: a pathway to sustainable energy and sensing applications
  12. Hydrothermal synthesis of Ricinus communis seed extract-mediated CQDs and their applications as antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and photocatalytic agents
  13. Mechanical and thermal characterization of Kevlar–Basalt hybrid composites reinforced with Al2O3 nanoparticles
  14. A dual-responsive Luteolin nanoparticles suppresses colorectal cancer growth by targeting tumor angiogenesis
  15. Heat and mass transfer in MHD-UCM nanofluid flow past a porous nonlinear stretching sheet with chemical reaction and bioconvection: a dual-method approach
  16. Orally administered dual-responsive insulin nanomedicine for diabetes and diabetic retinopathy
  17. Comparative RSM-based study of nano, hybrid, and ternary nanofluid heat transfer with Cattaneo–Christov flux in porous media
  18. Yttrium-doped copper oxide nanoparticles: potential therapeutic applications in metabolic, neurodegenerative, arthritic, and diabetic disorders
  19. Green synthesis of alginate-encapsulated silver nanoparticles and its utilization as anticancer and antimicrobial therapeutics
  20. Improving bending fatigue lifetime and interfacial adhesion of Cu–Mn flexible interconnects using self-forming nanolayer
  21. Fe-doped ZIF-8 for sunlight-driven photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue: synthesis, characterization, and AI-based process modeling
  22. Synthesis, characterization and biological activity of metal nanoparticles with green method using apple industry waste
  23. Synthesis of multifunctional chitosan-zinc oxide composite film with antimicrobial activity for packaging applications
  24. Drop-casted Ag2O:MnO2-nanocomposite thin-films-based gas sensors for improved sensitivity CH4 and NH3 gases: fabrication and unveiling of microstructural morphology, optical, and gas sensing characterizations
  25. Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous systems using jujube tree branch biochar-loaded nano zero-valent iron
  26. Numerical study of thermal and solutal stratification via Williamson nanofluid model with Cattaneo–Christove heat flux
  27. Bioinspired synthesis of AgO-ZnO nanocomposite via Cucumis melo leaves: a green catalyst for efficient malachite green degradation and antibacterial applications
  28. Durian husk-mediated green synthesis of Cr2O3 nanoparticles exhibiting uncompetitive inhibition of pancreatic lipase for anti-obesity applications
  29. Numerical investigation of IgG sensing through nanoscale topological-assisted metasurface for liquid biopsy
  30. Heat and mass transfer in micropolar hybrid nanofluids with magnetic, dissipation, and slip effects
  31. Tailoring thermal properties and fiber morphology in PVA nanofibers via addition of hydrothermally synthesized strontium oxide nanoparticles
  32. Effect of localized surface plasmon resonance of Au nanoparticles on the photovoltaic performance of CIGS/Si heterojunction structures
  33. Honey-CNT memristive artificial synaptic device for sustainable neuromorphic computing system
  34. Numerical investigation and optimization of unsteady micropolar nanofluid flow over a stretching surface using response surface methodology
  35. Catalytic activity of gold nanoparticles prepared with ultrasonic spray pyrolysis
  36. Dual-atomic Ag–Mn nanozyme/peptide coating enables ROS-driven antibacterial enhancement on ureteral stents
  37. Heat and mass transfer analysis of chemically reacted Cu/Al2O3 Casson hybrid nanofluid flow via porous medium under MHD and slip conditions
  38. Energy-aware forecasting of thermoelectric generator output in agricultural microgrids using recurrent neural networks
  39. EDTA-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles: enhanced adsorptive removal of toxic elements from water
  40. Ti–12Ta–6Zr/xAl2O3 bioinert load-bearing orthopedic materials by spark plasma sintering: processing, microstructure, mechanical properties, and nanoindentations
Heruntergeladen am 11.5.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2025-0279/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen