Home Physical Sciences Numerical study of thermal and solutal stratification via Williamson nanofluid model with Cattaneo–Christove heat flux
Article Open Access

Numerical study of thermal and solutal stratification via Williamson nanofluid model with Cattaneo–Christove heat flux

  • , EMAIL logo , and
Published/Copyright: March 16, 2026
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The study investigates fluid flow over a stratified sheet influenced by non-linear thermal radiation. By applying similarity transformations, the governing partial differential equations (PDEs) are converted to a set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), which are then solved using the shooting method. The analysis examines the effect of key flow parameters, including Brownian motion, Prandtl number, Eckert number, magnetic parameter, and thermophoresis parameter, on critical thermophysical quantities. For instance, the skin friction coefficient decreases with an increase in the Wessenberg number, dropping from approximately 2.3 to 2.2. Moreover, a reduction in the Cattaneo–Christov temperature parameter leads to a diminished temperature profile while enhancing the concentration distribution. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of non-linear radiative effects in stratified fluid flows.

Nomenclature

BVP

boundary value problem

C

concentration

C fx

skin friction

Ec

Eckert number

IVP

initial value problem

k

positive integer

K

thermal conductivity

k*

absorption constant

Le

Lewis number

M

magnetic parameter

MHD

magnetohydrodynamics

N 1

solutal stratification parameter

N 2, N 3

temperature ratio

Nb

Brownian motion parameter

Nt

thermophoresis number

Nu x

Nusselt number

p

pressure

Pr

Prandtl number

Rd

thermal radiation parameter

RK

Runge–Kutta

T

fluid temperature

T

ambient temperature

u, v

velocity components

α

thermal diffusivity

λ

porosity constant

λ d

Cattaneo–Christov concentration parameter

λ t

Cattaneo–Christov temperature parameter

μ

dynamic viscosity

ν

kinematic viscosity

ρ

density

ρc p

heat capacity

σ*

Stefan–Boltzmann constant

1 Introduction

With the rapid advancement of scientific and technological disciplines, researchers have been compelled to extend their analysis to boundary layer flow over linear stretching sheets. This area of study has wide range of industrial applications, including metal spinning, rubber sheet production, fiber glass manufacturing, and polymer processing such as wire drawing. The investigation of boundary layer flow over both linear and nonlinear stretching surfaces is particularly important because it addresses several biomedical and engineering challenges, such as cooling of electronic components, metal sheet processing, wire drawing, and petroleum extraction. Boundary layer theory, a fundamental concept in fluid mechanics, plays a crucial role in bridging theoretical solution with practical applications. Since its development in the 20th century, the theory has advanced rapidly due to its extensive applications. For instance, it has been used to calculate drag forces on objects moving through fluids, including blades, ships, airplanes, turbines, and airfoils. In doing so, it connects simplified theoretical model with real world problem, with progress often validated through experimental studies. In recent decades, significant attention has been directed toward heat and mass transfer in two-dimensional (2D) boundary layer flow over nonlinear stretching surfaces. This interest arises from its broad practical applications across engineering and industry, including extrusion, sheet manufacturing, air cooling systems, paper production, and drying technologies [1], 2]. Khan et al. [3] investigated the analytic solution of magnetized bio-convective second grade fluid on a porous media through a nonlinear flexible surface due to abounded of Cattaneo–Christov theory. Usafzai [4] derived an exact solution for a second-grade nanofluid considering slip boundary conditions and mass and heat transfer through a porous permeable medium. In order study, Khan et al. [5] conducted a numerical investigation on mixed convective flow of a Casson fluid influenced by the Cattaneo–Christov double diffusion model over an inclined, linearly flexible sheet. Furthermore, Usafzai et al. [6] investigated a comparatively analysis of hybrid nanofluid through a linear stretching surface in the presence of MHD. The numerical solution for boundary layer flow in the existence of Carreau fluid in the influence of thermal conductivity and viscous dissipation across a nonlinear flexible surface was reported by Kudenatti et al. [7]. Shaheen et al. [8] investigated the analytic solution of heat and mass transfer due to the existence of Williamson nanofluid through a permeable porous media. Nasir et al. [9] reported the nanoparticle dynamics in the influence of binary chemical process in the corresponding porous media by using a purely numerically technique. Sivakumar et al. [10] analyzed the different shape factor impact of nanofluid on mixed convection flow over a permeable medium.

Fourier [11] proposed the classical law of heat conduction, which has long served as the function of heat transfer analysis. To address the limitation of instantaneous propagation implied by Fourier’s law Cattaneo [12] introduce a relaxation time, and Christov [13] further refined this formulation by replacing the time derivative with the Oldroyd upper convective derivative, resulting in the Cattaneo–Christov heat flux law. This model extends Fourier’s law by incorporating finite heat propagation speed and thermal relaxation effects, thereby resolving the paradox of infinite thermal wave velocity and providing a more realistic description of heat transfer in complex systems. It highlights the influence of relaxation time on boundary layer thickness, fluid temperature, and heat transfer coefficients, and has been shown to yield more accurate solutions for viscoelastic and non-Newtonian fluids with complex rheological properties. Due to these advantages, the Cattaneo–Christov model has been widely applied in engineering problems such as heat exchangers, melting and evaporation processes, and multiphase flow systems, where its ability to couple conservation laws of momentum, mass, and heat with realistic heat flux prediction is particularly valuable [14]. Tharapatla et al. [15] examined the role of the Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model in describing the flow properties of a Williamson nanofluid over a porous media. Salahuddin and Awis [16] analyzed the non-isothermal flow over an exponential surface and reported that larger values of the thermal relaxation parameter lead to reductions in both the temperature distribution and the heat transfer coefficient.

Williamson fluid represents an important class of non-Newtonian fluids due to their broad range of applications in science, technology, and engineering. They have been utilized in processes involving material fabrication, nuclear and chemical industries, bioengineering, and geophysical flow. Their behavior under the influence of thermal radiation makes them particularly relevant to solar energy systems, advance manufacturing, and various heat transfer operations. Practical applications also extend to oil recovery, filtration, polymer processing, ceramic production, and petroleum extraction, where accurate modeling of their rheology is essential for optimizing performance. The pioneering contributions of Williamson [17] provide the first framework for describing pseudoplastic materials and has since inspired extensive research on their flow properties. In the present work, the Williamson nanofluid model is adopted to characterize the fluid motion. This model describes shear thinning behavior by incorporating the reduction of viscosity at higher shear rates, which is highly relevant for nanofluids containing suspended particles. Compared with other non-Newtonian formulations, such as the Maxwell or Oldroyed-B models, the Williamson model offers a balance of physical realism and mathematical simplicity, making it suitable for analytical and numerical analysis. It’s usefulness in simulating polymeric solutions, biomedical fluids, and industrial suspensions has been demonstrated in prior studies [18], 19] which further supports its selection for the current investigation. Obalalu et al. [20] adopted the Galerkin weighted residual technique to examine the combined effects of chemical reactions activation energy, and solar radiation on three-dimensional non-Newtonian fluid flow over an inclined stretching surface. Anwar et al. [21] conducted a study on the flow behavior of the Williamson fluid model over a moving surface incorporating the effects of nonlinear convective diffusion and variable thermal conductivity. Anwar [22] presented modeling and numerical simulations addressing fractional nonlinear viscoelastic. Khan et al. [23] carried out a numerical investigation of nonlinear time fractional fluid model to analyze heat transport processes in porous media.

Stratification, play a crucial rule both nature and industrial process, is very important for various operations. It arises from variations in density, concentration, temperature differences among fluids. When heat and mass transfer analysis take place at the same time while the double stratification occurs. In natural water bodies such as reservoirs and seas, thermal layering take place as stratification, while saltines change are seen in oceans, canals, ground water, rivers and dams. The process plays an important rule environmental adjustment and food production, the mixing substance have slightly difference density due to gravity. This change of density effect how liquid mixed and behave moreover, the flow of fluid near a stratified sheet is a remarkable in field of environmental science, engineering and oceanography, where layer system are common. The stratification has a small impact mass and heat transfer analysis. Heat transfer, a way to interchange energy among substance is a complex subject studied by scientist, mathematician, engineers and physicist. Investigate how heat transfer work in distinct materials and in boundary layer flow is it very important due to its large importance in many biological and industrial, such as paper making, fermentation, and bubble absorption. The primary objective off this heat transfer research is to reduce energy loss between significant industrial processes [24]. Inspected the numerically study of magnetized Maxwell nanofluid flow through a stratified linear flexible sheet with the presence of Cattaneo–Christov effect by lone et al. [25]. Hyder et al. [26] studied the influence of MHD tri hybrid nanofluid (Cu–Al2O3–TiO2/H2O) in the existence of stratification and thermal radiation over a perpendicular permeable sheet in a porous media. Lam et al. [27]. However, numerical studies on stratified on the distribution over a vertical cylindrical sheet in the existence of gravity current. Daniel et al. [28] exploring thermal stratification influence on MHD nanofluid through a linear flexible surface with the presence of variable thickness. Muzmmal et al. [29] focused on the heat and mass transfer analysis of a quadratic stratified nanofluid flow over the effect of inclined magnetic field and thermophoresis parameter.

Stratification refers to the vertical arrangement of fluid layers, which plays an important role in a variety of industrial processes, engineering applications, and atmospheric phenomena. In practical situations, where heat and mass transfer occur simultaneously, it becomes necessary to investigate the effects of dual stratification on nanofluids. Stratified fluids are commonly present in natural and engineered systems, including the release of heat into the atmosphere, thermal energy storage mechanisms such as solar ponds, and heat exchange from source like groundwater reservoirs and oceans. Thermal stratification also contributes to ecological processes, for instance by increasing oxygen concentration in the deeper layers of seas and reservoirs [30]. When the denser fluid remains beneath the lighter fluid, the system is said to exhibit stable stratification, as buoyancy forces act to resist vertical motion and suppress convective mixing. Conversely, unstable stratification occurs when a lighter fluid underlies a denser fluid, leading to buoyancy driven instabilities and enhance convective transport. These two modes of stratification play an essential role in geophysical and engineering flows, influencing processes such as thermal storage in solar ponds, mixing in reservoirs, and transport in porous media. The significance of stable and unstable stratification has been highlighted in studies on heat and mass transfer in nanofluids and porous systems, where the stability conditions directly affects entropy generation, convective flow patterns, and thermal efficiency [31], [32], [33]. Abbasi et al. [34] investigated the influence of dual stratification on the mixed convective flow of a Maxwell nanofluid in the existence of heat generation and absorption. Bilala et al. [35] conducted the numerical study of entropy optimization analysis of non-Darcian MHD Williamson nanofluid flow with the effect of thermal radiation through a stratification surface. Khan et al. [36] investigated double stratified stagnation point flow of Williamson nanofluid through a porous media with particular emphasis on entropy generation.

Studies on flow models for non-Newtonian fluids have attracted considerable attention because these fluids play an important role in many practical applications due to their unique properties. Their wide range of industrial and manufacturing uses has drawn the interest of researchers and scholars, particularly over the past few decades. Non-Newtonian fluids are employed in diverse fields such as planetary research, fusion reactors, polymer solutions, chemical production, geophysics, and bioengineering, each benefiting from their specialized behavior. Because of this demand, scientists have investigated non-Newtonian flow phenomena in various geometries to better understand and optimize their applications in industry and technology. One notable contribution was made by Powell and Eyring in 1944, who introduced a model describing how non-Newtonian fluids behave like viscous fluids under high shear stress. This model is grounded in the kinetic theory of gases, supplemented by empirical formulations to capture the complex behavior of these fluids [37]. Proposed the numerical study of non-Newtonian nanofluids of blade coating with the influence of MHD and slip boundary conditions presented by Javed et al. [38]. The effect of heat transfer in magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) nanofluid flows involving non-Newtonian fluids in the presence of polymer solution was examined by Sahreen et al. [39]. Furthermore, the numerical study of heat and mass transfer due to the presence of MHD non-Newtonian fluid flow across a titled, permeable porous media were examined by Tharapat et al. [40] Khan et al. [41] applied a well-known numerical method to analyzed MHD double diffusive convection of non-Newtonian fluid between parallel cylindrical surfaces. In additionally, Venthan et al. [42] carried out a computational analysis of MHD non-Newtonian fluid behavior, focusing on how variation in fluid properties influence by heat and mass transfer through a flexible linear surface.

MHD heat transfer is widely recognized for its significance in both scientific and industrial utilization, like metallurgical processing, fluid mechanics, and biomedical systems. It primarily aims to regulate and enhance fluid flow behavior by adjusting boundary layer parameters [43]. In this context the numerical study of MHD flow involving dissipative Williamson nanofluid through avertical porous domain, employing optimal homotopy asymptotic method (OHAM) for better solution accuracy carry out by Sohail et al. [44]. Additionally, Rehman et al. [45] investigated the effect of viscous dissipation in MHD Casson nanofluid flow over a flexible, nonlinear flexible surface, contributing to understanding energy loss in such systems. Finally, Priyadharshini et al. [46] observed the bio-convective properties of MHD Williamson nanofluid through a collateral stretching sheet, highlighting the interaction between microorganism movement and heat.

One of the primary challenges in modern science and technology lies in enhancing the heat transfer capabilities of convectional bas fluid. Efficient thermal management is critical for applications such as electronic circuit cooling, heat exchangers, and automotive thermal systems, where high performance, reduced operating temperatures, reliability, and extended lifespan are essential. Consequently, researchers have increasingly focused on improving the thermal transport properties of fluids through the incorporation of solid particles. Early attempts in this filed were made by Maxwell. [47], who introduced the concept of dispersing micro sized solid particles in conventional fluids to increase thermal conductivity. However, these efforts were unsuccessful due to sedimentation and flow obstruction. Building upon this foundation, Choi [48] later demonstrated that suspending nanoparticles particles on the nanometer scale in the base fluid significantly improves its heat transfer characteristics. The resulting suspension is termed a nanofluid. Compared to suspensions containing micro or milli sized particles, nanofluids exhibit enhanced thermal transport properties along with improved stability. This discovery sparked considerable interest within the scientific community, leading to extensive investigations into the potential applications of nanofluids across diverse engineering and industrial domains. For instance, Anwar [49] examined heat transfer characteristics in MHD convective stagnation point flow over a stretching surface in the presence of thermal radiation. Puneeth et al. [50] investigated the impact of bioconvection on the free stream flow of a pseudoplastic nanofluid past a rotating cone. Anwar et al. investigation investigated the heat transfer characteristic of MHD hybrid nanofluid with variable viscosity under the influence of thermal radiation. Yu et al. [51] explored heat transfer optimization in viscous ternary nanofluid flow over a starching or shrinking thin needle. Irfan et al. [52] conducted a numerical analysis on MHD bioconvective of Carreau nanofluids considering the effect of nonlinear thermal radiation Joule heating and gyrotactic microorganisms. Khan et al. [53] examined the numerical study of (MHD) flow using the Ellis model, investigate multiple synergistic effects. Hussain et al. [54] investigated nanoparticle radius dynamics in MHD driven dusty fluid heat transfer over linearly stretching surfaces. Shree et al. [55] conducted a numerical investigation of heat and mass transfer in electrically conducting hybrid nanofluids confined between side by side, linear stretching surface. Alharbi et al. [56] studied multiscale heat transfer enhancement in hybrid nanofluid flow through permeable porous media. Similarly, Awan et al. [57] performed a numerical study on tri-hybrid nanofluid heat and mass transfer over linearly stretching flexible cylinders. Kumar et al. [58] investigated the rheological behavior and heat transfer enhancement of Williamson nanofluids in mixed convection flow over a starching cylinder/plate. Sowmiya et al. [59] conducted a numerical investigation on the influence of a magnetic field and radiative heat flux on the rheological behavior of Williamson nanofluid in a stretching cylinder. Kanimozhi et al. [60] explored the effects of multiple slip conditions on MHD Williamson and Maxwell nanofluids over a stretching sheet saturated with a porous medium. Geetha et al. [61] reported that the influence of double stratification on MHD Williamson boundary layer flow and heat transfer over a shrinking sheet embedded in a porous medium.

In this study, we developed a comprehensive mathematical model to investigate the behavior of stratified sheet flows influenced by non-linear thermal radiation. The analysis incorporates key physical parameters, including Brownian motion, Prandtl number, Eckert number, magnetic number, and thermophoresis parameter, to examine their effects on critical thermophysical quantities. Results reveal that the skin friction coefficient decreases with an increase in the Weissenberg number, dropping from approximately 2.3 to 2.2. Furthermore, a reduction in the Cattaneo–Christove temperature parameter diminishes the temperature profile while simultaneously enhancing the concentration distribution. These finding provide deeper insights into the impact of non-linear radiative effects on stratified fluids flows. To solve the discretized governing equations, a detailed algorithm based on the shooting method combined with a fourth-order Runge–Kutta (Rk-4) scheme has been implemented. The main contributions of this work are summarized as follows:

  1. Developing a numerical framework for Williamson nanofluid incorporating Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass fluxes.

  2. Analyzing the dual stratification thermal and solutal effects together, which is rarely addressed in earlier works.

  3. Since analytical solution to the fluid flow problems is often intractable, the model is examined numerically using the shooting method in combination with the (RK-4) method.

  4. Appropriate similarity transformations are applied to reformulate the governing equations into a coupled system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs, which are then solve numerically.

The novelty of this research lies in its comprehensive treatment of thermal and solutal stratification effects in a Williamson nanofluid flow incorporating the Cattaneo–Christov double diffusion model. While prior studies have examined heat and mass transfer in non-Newtonian fluids, MHD flows, and even Cattaneo–Christov modifications individually, the simultaneous consideration of dual stratification, nonlinear thermal radiation, and the non-Newtonian features of Williamson fluid has not been adequately addresses. By integrating these complex mechanisms into a single framework, this study advances the understanding of how key thermophysical parameters interact to shape velocity, temperature, and concentration distributions. Moreover, the work extends existing models by including Joule heating, viscous dissipation, and nonlinear radiation, thereby offering a richer and more realistic representation of stratified nanofluid systems relevant to industrial and environmental processes. The objective of this study is to formulate and analyze a mathematical model for Williamson nanofluid flow over a stratified stretching sheet under the Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass flux framework. Using similarity transformations and the shooting method, the work investigates how key physical parameters like Weissenberg number, Brownian motion, Eckert number and Lewis number affect velocity, temperature, concentration, as well as the associated skin friction. While many studies have examined non-Newtonian nanofluids, MHD flows, and stratification, most treat thermal or solutal stratification separately and often neglect Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass fluxes. The combined influence of dual stratification, nonlinear radiation, Joule heating, and viscous dissipation in Williamson nanofluids has not been thoroughly explored, leaving a gap in modeling realistic industrial and environmental processes.

2 Mathematical modeling

The behavior of the Cattaneo–Christov MHD Williamson nanofluid has been systematically investigated over a stratified starching sheet. This study focuses on the effects of Joule heating, thermal conductivity, and Ohmic dissipation, which perform a remarkable role in shaping the fluids behavior. The stretching motion of the sheet is considered along the x-axis, with its velocity defined as u = U w (x) = bx, where b is a positive constant representing the rate of stretching. The physical flow model is shown in Figure 1, where the y-axis is oriented perpendicular to the stretching direction, and the x-axis aligns parallel to it. The ambient temperature varies linearly with the x-coordinate and is expressed as T  = T 0 + Bx. Similarly, the ambient concentration follows a linear distribution, described by C  = C 0 + Ex. The temperature and concentration at the sheet surface are defined as T w  = T 0 + Ax and C w  = C 0 + Dx, respectively, where A and B are constants representing their respective gradients. These boundary conditions together with the given norms, form the basis for deriving the governing equations of the proposed flow model as discussed in [17].

Figure 1: 
Flow configuration.
Figure 1:

Flow configuration.

2.1 Continuity equation

(1) u x + v y = 0 ,

2.2 Momentum equation

(2) u u x + v u y = ν u x x + 2 ν γ u y y σ ρ B 0 2 u = 0 ,

2.3 Energy equation

(3) ( ρ C p ) f ( u T x + v T y ) + λ 1 ( u u x + v u y ) T x + ( u v x + v v y ) T y + u 2 T x x + v 2 T y y + 2 u v T x y = k 1 + 16 σ * T 3 3 k * K T y y + ( ρ C p ) s D B T y C y + D T T ( T y ) 2 + σ B 0 2 u 2 + μ 0 ( u y ) 2 + μ 0 γ ( u y ) 3 .

In Eq. (3), the Rosseland radiative heat flux and is given by [62].

q r = 4 σ * 3 κ * T 4 y .

Expand T 4 about T with the help of Taylor series [63] and ignoring the higher power terms we have:

T 4 4 T 3 T 3 T 4 .

2.4 Concentration equation

(4) u C x + v C y = D B C y y + D T T T y y k 1 ( C C ) .

2.5 Boundary conditions

The boundary conditions applied to this fluid dynamics problem are outlined as follows [17].

(5) u = U W ( X ) , v = 0 , C = C w , T = T w a t y = 0 , u 0 , T T , C C a s y .

In the above equations, the velocity components along the surface in the x- and y-directions are represented by u and v, respectively. However, the momentum equation containing the term of viscous diffusion ν, incorporate the additional impacts such as damping ν k * magnetic field intensity σ B 0 2 , the thermal conductivity express by k, viscous dissipation is represented by μ 0, k* represent for the absorption coefficient and σ* is denoted the Stefan–Boltzman constant and the term thermophoresis is stand by D T . Finally the concentration equation demonstrates the chemical reaction constant which is represented by k 1.

To enhance clarity, boundary conditions are described in terms of their physical relevance. At the starching sheet surface, the velocity condition u = U w (x) represents the no-slip requirement, while v = 0 indicates that the sheet is impermeable to fluid penetration. The prescribed wall temperature and concentration T w , C w corresponding to controlled heating and nanoparticle concentration at the boundary. In contrast, the far field conditions (u → 0, TT , CC ) characterized the undisturbed ambient state of the fluid away from the influence of the sheet. This specification established a direct physical link between the mathematical formulation and the actual flow situation.

2.5.1 Similarity transformation

For the conversation of the dimensional equations, a particular set of similarity variables, as defined in [17] is launch

(6) u = b x f η , v = ( b ν ) 1 2 f ( η ) , η = b ν 1 2 y , θ ( η , y ) = T T T w T , g ( η , y ) = C C C w C .

where,

T = T w = T 0 + A x , T = T 0 + B x , C = C w = C 0 + D x , C = C 0 + E x ,

T = ( T w T 0 ) θ ( η ) + T .

The constants A, B, C, and D are dimensional parameters with units of (K/m). Referring to equation Eq. (6), the function θ(η, y) can be reformulated as:

(7) T = ( T W T 0 ) θ ( η ) + T , r = T A x B x T 0 B x + 1 θ ( η ) + 1 , T = T θ N 2 ( N 3 + 1 ) + 1 .

The parameters N 2 and N 3 represent specific temperature ratios, which are expressed as follows:

N 2 = B A , N 3 = T 0 B x .

As a result, Eq. (1) is automatically satisfied, while Eqs. (2)(3) and Eq. (4) provide the following equations:

(8) 3 f η 3 f η 2 + f 2 f η 2 + W e 2 f η 2 M f η = 0 ,

(9) 1 λ t f η 2 + 4 3 R d 1 + B 1 3 θ 3 + 3 B 1 2 θ 2 + 3 B 1 θ 2 θ η 2 λ t N 2 f η 2 f 2 f η 2 + f η 2 θ f 2 f η 2 θ f f η θ η + P r f θ η N 2 f η f η θ + N b θ η g η + N t N b θ η 2 + M E c f η 2 + E c 2 f η 2 2 + W e E c 2 2 f η 2 3 + 4 3 R d 3 B 1 2 θ 2 θ η 3 B 1 θ η 2 + 6 B 1 2 θ θ η 2 = 0 ,

(10) 1 λ t f 2 2 g η 2 L e P r g f η + N 1 f η + f g η + k g + N t N b 2 θ η 2 = 0 .

The corresponding boundary conditions following the application of the aforementioned transformations (6) are:

(11) f = 0 , f η = 1 , g = 1 N 1 , θ = 1 N 2 , at  η = 0 , f η 0 , g 0 , θ 0 , as  η .

In the above equations, Ec denotes the Eckert number, Pr stand for Prandtl number, We is the Weissenberg number, M indicates the magnetic parameter, Le corresponds to the Lewis number, and Nt signifies the thermophoresis parameter, Rd refers to the radiation parameter, and Nb denotes the Brownian motion parameter. To analyze the model, the following dimensionless parameters are considered [17], 35]:

(12) B 1 = 1 N 2 ( N 3 + 1 ) , E c = b 2 x 2 C p ( T w T 0 ) , W e = γ x 2 b 3 ν , λ t = ν a λ 1 k , N t = ( ρ C p ) s D T ( T w T 0 ) ν ( ρ C p ) f T , M = σ B 0 2 ρ b , L e = α D B , P r = ν ( ρ C p ) f k , N b = ( ρ C p ) s D B ( C w C 0 ) ν ( ρ C p ) f , N 1 = E D , R d = 4 σ * T 3 k * K , N 2 = B A .

3 Quantities of interest

The dimensionless skin friction coefficient, Nusselt number, and Sherwood number are critical parameters in engineering and industrial applications. Their definitions are provided below:

3.1 The skin friction coefficient

One crucial aspect of the boundary layer feature is the skin friction coefficient, which is provided by:

C f x = 2 ( τ w ) y = 0 ρ u w 2 ( x ) .

The share wall stress in this study is τ w , which may be defined using the following formula:

τ w = μ u y + γ 2 u y 2 y = 0 .

The following relation can be used to express the skin friction coefficient in its dimensionless form:

(13) C f ( R e x ) 1 2 = 2 f ( 0 ) + W e f ( 0 ) .

3.2 The local Nusselt number

The Nusselt number can be stated as follows:

N u x = x q w k ( T w T ) ,

the local heat flux q w at the surface for the current issue is determined by:

q w = k + 16 T 3 σ * 3 k * A x b ν 1 / 2 θ ( η ) η = 0 .

The following expression represents the local Nusselt number in the dimensionless form:

(14) N u ( R e x ) 1 2 = θ ( 0 ) + 4 3 R d ϕ ( 0 ) ( N 2 1 ) .

3.3 The Sherwood number

An expression for the Sherwood number is formulated as:

S h x = x q m D B ( C w C ) .

The surface concentration flux, represented as q m and is described by the following expression:

q m = D B D x b ν 1 / 2 g ( η ) η = 0 .

An expression for the Sherwood number in dimensionless representation is provide below:

(15) S h ( R e x ) 1 2 = g ( 0 ) ( 1 N 1 ) .

4 Numerical treatment

This study focuses on solving the nonlinear coupled system of ordinary differential equations (8)(10), along with associated boundary conditions (11), using the well-established shooting method [63]. To facilitate the solution process, a set of new variables is introduced.

Z 1 = f , Z 2 = f , Z 3 = f , Z 4 = θ , Z 5 = θ , Z 6 = g , Z 7 = g .

By transformation, equations (8)(10) are rewritten as a set of seven first order ODEs:

(16) Z 1 = Z 2 , Z 2 = Z 3 , Z 3 = 1 1 + W e Z 3 Z 2 2 Z 2 Z 3 + M Z 2 , Z 4 = Z 5 , Z 5 = 1 1 λ t Z 1 2 + 4 3 R d 1 + B 1 3 Z 4 3 + 3 B 1 2 Z 4 2 + 3 B 1 Z 4 { λ t N 2 Z 2 2 λ t N 2 Z 1 Z 3 + λ t Z 2 2 Z 4 λ t Z 1 Z 3 Z 4 λ t Z 1 Z 2 Z 5 P r Z 1 Z 5 N 2 Z 2 Z 2 Z 4 + N b Z 5 Z 7 + N t N b Z 7 2 + M E c Z 2 2 + E c Z 3 2 + W e E c 2 Z 3 3 4 3 R d 3 B 1 2 Z 4 2 Z 5 2 + 3 B 1 Z 4 Z 5 2 + 6 B 1 2 Z 4 Z 5 2 } , Z 6 = Z 7 , Z 7 = 1 1 λ d Z 1 2 L e P r Z 2 Z 6 + N 1 Z 2 + Z 1 Z 7 + K Z 6 N t N b Z 5 . }

The following are the corresponding boundary conditions:

for  η = 0 : Z 1 ( η ) = 0 , Z 2 ( η ) = 1 , Z 3 ( η ) = P 1 , Z 4 ( η ) = 1 N 2 , as  η : Z 5 ( η ) = P 2 , Z 6 ( η ) = 1 N 1 , Z 7 ( η ) = P 3 .

To meet the specified boundary conditions, unknown initial values Z 3(0) = P 1, Z 5(0) = P 2, and Z 7(0) = P 3 are assumed. These initial estimates, P 1, P 2, and P 3, are progressively improved using Newton’s iterative method until convergence to the acceptable level of accuracy is attained. The iterative process is terminated once the following convergence is satisfied.

(17) max | Z 2 ( η max ) 0 | , | Z 5 ( η max ) 0 | , | Z 7 ( η max ) 0 | < 1 0 5 .

Additionally, for the numerical calculations, we have taken into consideration a bounded domain [0, ∞] rather than [0, ∞). From our computational result, it can be observed that boosting η max, no substantial fluctuations are noticed in the computational results (Figure 2).

Figure 2: 
Flow chart of shooting method.
Figure 2:

Flow chart of shooting method.

4.1 Algorithm for shooting method with ODEs system

The shooting method proceeds through several key steps.

  1. Initially, the required input parameters are specified. Subsequently, the boundary value problem is reformulated as an equivalent initial value problem, represented by the discretized system of ordinary differential equations y′ = f(η, y), where [ y 1 , y 2 , , y 7 ] T and f represents a vector valued function.

  2. For a general interval [a, b], the boundary conditions are specified as; y(a) = y a and y(b) = y b .

  3. The shooting method begins with initial guesses for the unknown data at the boundaries, denoted as y a ( 0 ) and  y b ( 0 ) .

Procedure: The iterative process of the shooting method can be outlined as follows:

  1. Define a tolerance ϵ and a maximum number of iterations N.

  2. Initialize the iteration counter with k = 0.

  3. Use an ODE solver to solve the initial value problem with the guessed initial conditions y a ( k ) and y b ( k ) .

  4. Represent the obtained solution as y (k)(η).

  5. Evaluate the discrepancies at the boundaries: E a  = ‖y (k)(a) − y a ‖, E b  = ‖y (k)(b) − y b ‖.

  6. If both E a and E b are within the tolerance ϵ, the method terminates. Otherwise, update the guesses and proceed to the next iteration.

  7. Updating initial conditions:

The iterative scheme proceeds by updating the approximation of the variables. Specifically, the updates are given by:

y a ( k + 1 ) = y a ( k ) E a f a u a ( k ) , y b ( k + 1 ) = y b ( k ) E b f b y b ( k ) .

Now we will increase the iteration counter k by 1. If k reaches the maximum allowable number of iterations N, the process terminates with a message indicating convergence failure. Otherwise, the method proceeds to produce an output representing the solution of the ODE system within the prescribed tolerance, here set as ϵ = 10−6. It is important to note that the shooting method, while effective for solving boundary value problems, has inherent limitations, particular when applied to complex systems of ODEs. Its success relies heavily on accurate initial guesses for unknown boundary values; poor initial estimates may result in divergence. Consequently, the method is best suited for lower dimensional, well-conditioned systems or scenarios where reliable initial approximations are available. Stability in the shooting method, particularly when combined with a (RK) solver, requires adherence to certain conditions. Specifically, the step size must be sufficiently small to capture the systems behavior accurately, and tolerance levels must be chosen appropriately. Stability is generally enhanced when the problem is neither overly stiff nor excessively sensitive to the initial guesses.

The iterative procedure employed in the shooting method is terminated once the convergence criterion defined in Eqs. (16) and (17) is satisfied. This guarantees that the far field boundary conditions are fulfilled with a high level of accuracy, typically set to 10−5. To verify the numerical stability and grid independence of the solution, a convergence test was performed by systematically varying the step size Δη and the far field boundary value (η ) resulting values of the skin friction coefficient −f″(0) and the local Nusselt number −θ′(0) for difference choices of Δη and η are summarized in table below. It is observed that for value (η ) ≥ 8 and Δη ≤ 0.01, the computed results remain consistent up to four decimal places. This confirms that the solution is independent of the selected computational domain and step size (Table 1).

Table 1:

Convergence check for different values of η and Δη.

η Δη f″(0) θ′(0)
6 0.1 2.34123 2.47105
8 0.05 2.34139 2.47891
10 0.01 2.34139 2.47891
12 0.001 2.34139 2.47891

5 Result and discussion

The numerical solution for the set of (ODEs) describing the flow problem in dimensionless form is the main focus of this section. The findings are illustrated through table and graphs to enhance the clarity of the analysis. This study examines on a non-Darcian (MHD) nanofluid using the Cattaneo–Christov double diffusion model. The discussion emphasizes the dimensionless velocity, temperature and concentration profile, along with other relevant physical characteristic specified earlier.

5.1 Benchmarks

Comparison of results calculated by Sagheer et al. [17] and Khan et al. [64] for the Skin friction. In order to validate the accuracy and reliability of the developed numerical code, a comparison is conducted between the computed skin friction coefficient values and those reported by Sagheer et al. [17] and Khan et al. [64]. As demonstrated in Table 2, the results exhibit excellent agreement, thereby confirming the robustness and credibility of the present computational approach.

Table 2:

Results of C f x ( R e x ) 1 / 2 for various values of We, M.

We M Sagheer et al. [17] Khan et al. [64] Current
0.1 0.1 2.05613 2.05608 2.05600
0.1 0.3 2.01106 2.01101 2.01106
0.1 0.5 1.96135 1.96124 1.92109
0.3 0.1 2.14589 2.14587 2.14655
0.4 0.1 2.23185 2.23184 2.23195

5.2 The skin friction coefficient

Table 3 illustrates the influence of various physical parameters on the skin friction coefficient C f x ( R e x ) 1 2 . An increase in the magnetic field parameter M leads to a significant rise in the skin friction coefficient, indicating enhanced resistance to fluid motion near the surface. Conversely, a higher Weissenberg number results in a reduction of surface shear stress, thereby reflecting a corresponding decrease in surface drag.

Table 3:

Impact of varying values of the magnetic parameter M and Weissenberg number on the skin friction coefficient.

M We C f x ( R e x ) 1 2
0.1 0.1 2.3413861
0.3 0.1 2.5469158
0.5 0.1 2.7288232
0.1 0.3 2.3021098
0.1 0.4 2.2798322
0.1 0.5 2.2546954

5.3 The heat transfer rate

Table 4 presents the impact of several key dimensionless physical parameters on the heat transfer rate, expressed as the Nusselt number N u x ( R e x ) 1 2 . The analysis reveals that increasing the thermal relaxation parameter, magnetic parameter, Wiesenberger number, thermophoresis parameter, and Cattaneo–Christov parameter tends to reduce the rate of heat transfer. In contrast, enhancements in the relaxation time parameter, radiation number, Brownian motion number, and Eckert number contribute to an increase in the Nusselt number, thereby including improved heat transfer.

Table 4:

Presents the analysis of Nusselt number variations corresponding to λ t  = 0.1, λ d  = 0.3, Rd = 0.3, Ec = 0.1 and Nt = 0.5, under the fixed conditions N 1 = 0.8, N 2 = 0.8, Nb = 0.5, We = 0.3, and M = 0.3.

M λ t λ d Rd Nb Nt Ec We N u x ( R e x ) 1 2
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.4789050
0.4 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.4275387
0.5 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.3810206
0.6 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.3387392
0.3 0.01 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.3302562
0.3 0.03 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.3629144
0.3 0.05 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.3957813
0.3 0.1 0.05 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.4839531
0.3 0.1 0.07 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.4819341
0.3 0.1 0.09 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.4799148
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.4537243
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.4615933
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.4808639
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.5778421
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.6444390
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.6908632
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.55 0.1 0.1 2.4119049
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.60 0.1 0.1 2.3451044
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.65 0.1 0.1 2.2785027
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 2.5978297
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.1 2.6573633
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.1 2.7169453
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.2 2.4418579
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.3 2.3975895
0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.4 2.3383339

5.4 The mass transfer rate

Table 5 Provides an examination of the Sherwood number S h ( R e x ) 1 2 under the influence of various emerging factors. The results show that as the Prandtl number, thermophoretic parameter, thermal conductivity and Lewis number increases, the Sherwood number falls steadily. Additionally, large values of the Cattaneo–Christov parameter and Eckert number are similarly associated with a decrease in the Sherwood number.

Table 5:

Results of S h x ( R e x ) 1 2 when N 1 = 0.8, N 2 = 0.8, Nb = 0.5, We = 0.3, and M = 0.3.

k λ d Le Nt Pr Ec S h x ( R e x ) 1 2
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.2455213
0.2 0.05 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.1869077
0.3 0.05 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.1331285
0.4 0.05 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.0833762
0.1 0.07 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.2514461
0.1 0.08 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.2544090
0.1 0.09 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.2573721
0.1 0.05 0.55 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.1298854
0.1 0.05 0.60 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.0170950
0.1 0.05 0.65 0.5 0.7 0.1 −0.0929428
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.8490430
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.1 1.149179
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.1 1.4482351
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.1 0.2415029
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.2322207
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.1 0.2182050
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.3963291
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.5473833
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.6986916

6 Graphical results

This section covers the effect of key parameters on the flow and heat transfer properties of the modeled systems. The graphs for various dimensionless quantities illustrate how fluid motion and heat transfer are governed under different conditions. Specially, the figures show the variations in the concentration profile g(η), thermal distribution θ(η), and velocity distribution f′(η), with respect to the governing parameters. Unless otherwise specified, the following values are used for all graphical representation of velocity, temperature and concentration profile: We = 0.3, Ec = 0.4, Rd = 0.4, Le = 1.0, Ec = 0.4, M = 0.3, Pr = 0.7, Nt = 0.5, Nb = 0.5, N 1 = 0.8 and λ d  = 0.1.

6.1 Analysis of the velocity profile

Figure 3 demonstrate the effect of magnetic parameter M on the dimensionless velocity distribution. An increase in the magnetic number intensifies the Lorentz force, which acts in opposition to the flow. As a result, the thickness of the velocity boundary layer diminishes. The analysis of Weissenberg number We on the momentum boundary layer is observe in Figure 4 the relationship among the relaxation period and time scale of the fluid flow, can be describe that as we enhance the relaxation time lengthens, permeable for large flow resistance. Due to which, the thickness of the corresponding momentum boundary layer grows, as a result, the velocity of the fluid decrees.

Figure 3: 
Effect of M on f′(η).
Figure 3:

Effect of M on f′(η).

Figure 4: 
Effect of We on f′(η).
Figure 4:

Effect of We on f′(η).

6.2 Analysis of the temperature profile

This section provides a derailed and structured explanation of the influence of various dimensionless parameters on the temperature distribution. The analysis carefully examines these parameters, highlighting their roles and effects in shaping the thermal behavior. Each parameter is discussed systematically, offering a comprehensive understanding of their contributions and the interrelation between these parameters and the resulting temperature profile.

Figure 5 illustrate the effect of the Cattaneo–Christov parameter λ t on the temperature distribution. It is observed that as the values of λ t increase, the temperature profile exhibits a noticeable decline. Generally, this parameter accounts for thermal relaxation, as a result heat take time to generate through the material alternatively of spreading immediately. As the factor enlarge, the delayed heat transfer go to slows fall down the open out of thermal energy, remarkable to lower temperature throughout the system. Figure 6 analyses the changes in the dimensionless temperature distribution influence by the magnetic parameter. A gradually increase in magnetic intensity leads to a rise in the thermal boundary layer thickness. Physically, this occurs because the strengthening magnetic field intensifies the resistive force. The role of viscous dissipation is characterized by the Eckert number, which establishes a relationship among kinetic energy and change in thermal energy. The influence of Ec on the thermal boundary layer is depicted in Figure 7. It is observed that a gradual rise in the Eckert number results in a decline in the temperature field. This behavior is attributed to the dominance of enhanced energy transport mechanisms associated with higher flow kinetic energy, which outweigh the effect of viscous dissipation and lead to a reduction in the overall temperature distribution.

Figure 5: 
Effect of λ

t
 on θ(η).
Figure 5:

Effect of λ t on θ(η).

Figure 6: 
Effect of M on θ(η).
Figure 6:

Effect of M on θ(η).

Figure 7: 
Effect of Ec on θ(η).
Figure 7:

Effect of Ec on θ(η).

Figure 8 demonstrates the effect of the Brownian motion parameter Nb on the temperature distribution. An increase in Nb values leads to a noticeable rise in temperature profile. This behavior is attributed to the intensified random motion of nanoparticles, which enhances both the thermal and momentum boundary layer thicknesses at elevated Nb levels. Figure 9 explores the role of the solutal stratification parameter N 1 on the temperature distribution. A steady increase in N 1 results in a reduction of the thermal boundary layer thickness, indicating a cooling effect. Furthermore, Figure 10 examines the influence of the thermophoresis parameter Nt on the temperature distribution. As Nt increase, the temperature profile shows a corresponding rise. This trend occurs because thermophoretic forces cause hotter particles to drift away from the heated surface toward cooler regions, thereby increasing the thermal energy within the fluid domain.

Figure 8: 
Effect of Nb on θ(η).
Figure 8:

Effect of Nb on θ(η).

Figure 9: 
Effect of N
1 on θ(η).
Figure 9:

Effect of N 1 on θ(η).

Figure 10: 
Effect of Nt on θ(η).
Figure 10:

Effect of Nt on θ(η).

Figure 11 highlights the influence of the Prandtl number Pr on the temperature field. As Pr increases the temperature gradient becomes declined. This behavior arises because a higher Prandtl number, which represents the ratio of momentum diffusivity to thermal diffusivity, corresponding to lower thermal diffusivity. Consequence, heat spreads less efficiently, resulting in a declined temperature profile. Figure 12 shows the influence of the radiation parameter Rd on the temperature distribution. As Rd increases, the temperature profile increase. Physically, increasing Rd strengthens radiative heat transport, which adds more thermal energy to the fluid and thickens the thermal boundary layer, so the temperature profile increases.

Figure 11: 
Effect of Pr on θ(η).
Figure 11:

Effect of Pr on θ(η).

Figure 12: 
Effect of Rd on θ(η).
Figure 12:

Effect of Rd on θ(η).

6.3 Analysis of the concentration profile

Figure 13 analyzes the effect of the solute stratification number on the concentration profile. From the figure, it is clearly observed that the gradually increasing values of N 1, the corresponding velocity distribution is decline. This occurs because solutal stratification suppresses mass diffusion, which weakens particle transport and reduces the concentration profile. Furthermore, Figure 14 illustrate the relationship between the Brownian motion parameter and the associate concentration distribution. As the ascending order values of Nb increases as a result the concentration profile declines. In generally, Brownian motion heat fluid particles within the boundary layer and moves them away from the fluid region, leading to a reduction in the concentration distribution. Finally, Figure 15 presents the influence of the thermophoresis parameter Nt on the concentration profile. The results indicate that the concentration increases with higher values of Nt. Physically, this occurs because stronger thermophoretic forces drive particles away from the heated surface toward cooler regions, thereby enhancing their concentration.

Figure 13: 
Effect of N
1 on g(η).
Figure 13:

Effect of N 1 on g(η).

Figure 14: 
Effect of Nb on g(η).
Figure 14:

Effect of Nb on g(η).

Figure 15: 
Effect of Nt on g(η).
Figure 15:

Effect of Nt on g(η).

Figure 16 indicates that the concentration profile increases with an increase in the Prandtl number Pr. Physically a large Pr is associated with low thermal conductivity that has poor heat diffusion in comparison with momentum diffusion. This decreased diffusion of heat inhibits mixing of heat to the fluid hence resulting to the solute species being concentrated at the surface. The concentration boundary layer is therefore increased resulting in a better concentration profile. Finally, there is an incremental development in the dimensionless concentration distribution as the Cattaneo Christov concentration parameter increases gradually as observed in Figure 17. This measure is the relaxation time of the concentration diffusion. Increase in this parameter causes delay in diffusion of the solute species and it compromises mass diffusion at the surface. Consequently, solute will be concentrated towards the boundary thus creating a better concentration profile.

Figure 16: 
Effect of Pr on g(η).
Figure 16:

Effect of Pr on g(η).

Figure 17: 
Effect of λ

d
 on g(η).
Figure 17:

Effect of λ d on g(η).

7 Conclusions

In the present study, numerical investigation has been conducted on thermal and solutal stratification in Wiliamson nanofluid flow, incorporating Cattaneo–Christov heat flux, over a linearly stretching sheet.

7.1 Principal findings

  1. The analysis shows that the velocity distribution declines with gradually increasing magnetic parameter and Wessenberg number.

  2. An increase in the Cattaneo–Christov parameter, relaxation time parameter, Prandtl number, and Eckert number, leads to a reduction in the temperature field.

  3. For high values of Brownian motion parameter, radiation number, magnetic number, and thermophrosis parameter leads to increase temperature profile.

  4. As the values of the thermophoresis parameter, relaxation time parameter, and Brownian motion parameter increase, the dimensionless concentration distribution exhibits a decreasing trend. In contrast, the Prandtl number and the Cattaneo–Christov parameter demonstrate the opposite behavior.

  5. The concentration profile decreases with an increase in the stratification number and the Brownian motion parameter, whereas an increase in the concentration profile is observed with increasing thermophoresis number, Prandtl number, and relaxation time parameter.

  6. The skin friction coefficient increases with higher values of the magnetic parameter, whereas it decreases with increasing values of the Weissenberg number.

  7. An increase in the radiation number, Brownian motion number, Eckert number and relaxation time parameter is associated with a higher rate of heat transfer. On the other hand, the steadily increasing values of the magnetic number, Cattaneo–Christov, thermophoresis parameter, and Weissenberg numbers show a deterioration.

  8. Finally the mass transfer rate falls down for the higher values of Cattaneo–Christov number and Eckert number while a reverse effect is observed by gradually increases values of lewis number, thermophoresis parameter, Prandtl number, and thermal conductivity.

7.2 Practical applications

The present findings have several practical implications in engineering systems where fluid transport, heat and nanoparticles dynamics are significant:

  1. Reduced skin friction at higher Weissenberg numbers in Williamson nanofluid helps control shear stresses in film coating and extrusion.

  2. Lower temperature profiles under Cattaneo–Christov effects in Williamson nanofluid support efficient thermal management in microelectronics and nuclear systems.

  3. The role of Brownian motion and thermophoresis in Williamson nanofluids is relevant for targeted drug delivery and biomedical cooling where nanoparticle transport is critical.

  4. Stratified radiative Williamson nanofluid flows provide insights for solar collectors, insulation systems, and atmospheric thermal studies.


Corresponding author: Usa Humphries Wannasingha, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology, Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The first author appreciates the support provided by Petchra Pra Jom Klao Ph.D. Research Scholarship through grant no (10/2567), by King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Thailand. This research was supported by the Reinventing University Program 2025, under the Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Thailand. This research project is supported by King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI), and National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF) Fiscal Year 2025 Grant number FRB680074/0164.

  1. Funding information: This research was supported by the Reinventing University Program 2025, under the Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Thailand. This research project is supported by King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI), and National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF) Fiscal Year 2025 Grant number FRB680074/0164.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

1. Shah, S, Atif, SM, Kamran, A. Radiation and slip effects on MHD Maxwell nanofluid flow over an inclined surface with chemical reaction. Heat Transfer 2021;50:4062–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.22064.Search in Google Scholar

2. Sreedevi, P, Reddy, PS. Unsteady boundary layer heat and mass transfer flow of nanofluid over porous stretching sheet with non-uniform heat generation/absorption and double stratification. J Nanofluids 2023;12:2067–77. https://doi.org/10.1166/jon.2023.2076.Search in Google Scholar

3. Khan, MN, Khan, AA, Alhowaity, A, Masmoudi, A, Daradkeh, YI, Afikuzzaman, M. Computational analysis of magnetized bio-convective partially ionized flow of second-order fluid on a bidirectional porous stretching sheet with Cattaneo–Christov theory. J Comput Des Eng 2024;11:247–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwae012.Search in Google Scholar

4. Usafzai, WK. Multiple exact solutions of second degree nanofluid slip flow and heat transport in porous medium. Therm Sci Eng Prog 2023;40:101759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101759.Search in Google Scholar

5. Khan, MN, Alhuthali, AMS, Amjad, A, Saqlain, M, Yar, M, Alshammry, N, et al.. Numerical investigation of mixed convective flow of micropolar Casson fluid with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model on an inclined vertical stretching surface. J Comput Des Eng 2024;11:174–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwae045.Search in Google Scholar

6. Usafzai, WK, Aly, EH. Hiemenz flow with heat transfer in a slip condition micropolar fluid model: exact solutions. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 2023;144:106775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106775.Search in Google Scholar

7. Kudenatti, RB, Misbah, NE, Bharathi, MC. A numerical study on boundary layer flow of Carreau fluid and forced convection heat transfer with viscous dissipation and generalized thermal conductivity. Math Comput Simulation 2023;208:619–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2023.01.026.Search in Google Scholar

8. Shaheen, S, Arain, MB, Nisar, KS, Albakri, A, Shamshuddin, MD, Mallawi, FO, et al.. A case study of heat transmission in a Williamson fluid flow through a ciliated porous channel: a semi-numerical approach. Case Stud Therm Eng 2023;41:102523.10.1016/j.csite.2022.102523Search in Google Scholar

9. Nasir, S, Berrouk, A, Aamir, A. Exploring nanoparticle dynamics in binary chemical reactions within magnetized porous media: a computational analysis. Sci Rep 2024;14:25505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76757-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Devi, MR, Sivakumar, N, Noeiaghdam, S, Fernandez-Gamiz, U. Multiple shape factor effects of nanofluids on marangoni mixed convection flow through porous medium. Results Eng 2024;23:102512.10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102512Search in Google Scholar

11. Grattan-Guinness, I. Joseph Fourier, Théorie analytique de la chaleur (1822). In: Landmark writings in western mathematics 1640–1940. Paris: Elsevier; 2005:354–65 pp.10.1016/B978-044450871-3/50107-8Search in Google Scholar

12. Cattaneo, C. Sulla conduzione del calore. Atti Sem Mat Fis Univ Modena 1948;3:83–101.Search in Google Scholar

13. Christov, CI. On frame indifferent formulation of the Maxwell–Cattaneo model of finite-speed heat conduction. Mech Res Commun 2009;36:481–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.11.003.Search in Google Scholar

14. Faisal, RA, Ramzan, A. Impact of Cattaneo–Christov and Joule heating on MHD hybrid nanofluid flow through orthogonal rotating permeable coaxial disks. J Therm Anal Calorim 2025;150:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-025-14291-9.Search in Google Scholar

15. Tharapatla, G, Tharapatla, G, Kumar, JR. Significance of Cattaneo–Christov model on the systematic flow of Williamson nanofluid in a porous medium. World J Eng 2025;22:445–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/wje-02-2023-0051.Search in Google Scholar

16. Salahuddin, T, Awais, M. Thermal and solutal transport by Cattaneo–Christov model for the magnetohydrodynamic Williamson fluid with joule heating and heat source/sink. Heliyon 2024;10:e29228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29228.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Sagheer, M, Sajid, Z, Hussain, S, Shahzad, H. Cattaneo–Christov double diffusion model for the entropy analysis of a non-Darcian MHD Williamson nanofluid. Numer Heat Transfer Part A 2024;85:3147–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2024.2380365.Search in Google Scholar

18. Sadiq, MA, Hayat, T. Darcy–Forchheimer flow of magneto Maxwell liquid bounded by convectively heated sheet. Results Phys 2016;6:884–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2016.10.019.Search in Google Scholar

19. Khan, M, Malik, MY, Salahuddin, T, Saleem, S, Hussain, A. Change in viscosity of Maxwell fluid flow due to thermal and solutal stratifications. J Mol Liq 2019;288:110970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.110970.Search in Google Scholar

20. Obalalu, AM, Salawu, SO, Olayemi, OA, Ajala, OA, Issa, K. Analysis of hydromagnetic Williamson fluid flow over an inclined stretching sheet with Hall current using Galerkin weighted residual method. Comput Math Appl 2023;146:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2023.06.021.Search in Google Scholar

21. Anwar, MS, Irfan, M, Muhammad, T, Hussain, M. Flow analysis of Williamson model over a moving surface with nonlinear convection/diffusion and variable thermal conductivity. Numer Heat Transfer Part A 2024;86:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2024.2345587.Search in Google Scholar

22. Anwar, MS. Modeling and numerical simulations of some fractional nonlinear viscoelastic flow problems. Lahore: Lahore University of Management Sciences; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

23. Khan, M, Rasheed, A, Anwar, MS. Numerical analysis of nonlinear time-fractional fluid models for simulating heat transport processes in porous medium. J Appl Math Mech 2023;103:e202200544. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.202200544.Search in Google Scholar

24. Mustapha, RA, Abass, FA, Enikuomehin, OA, Akanbi, MA, Salau, AM. A numerical analysis of the flow and heat transfer characteristics of Eyring–Powell fluid with mixed convection over a stratified sheet: convection on the flow and heat transfer. J Niger Math Soc 2024;43:59–79.Search in Google Scholar

25. Lone, SA, Anwar, S, Raizah, Z, Almusawa, MY, Saeed, A. A magnetized Maxwell nanofluid flow over a stratified stretching surface with Cattaneo–Christov double diffusion theory. J Magn Magn Mater 2023;575:170722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170722.Search in Google Scholar

26. Hyder, A, Lim, YJ, Khan, I, Hamed, YS, Shafie, S. Heat transfer mechanisms in ternary TiO2–Al2O3–Cu/water-based nanofluids at stagnation phase change surfaces. J Appl Comput Mech 2024;11:770–86.Search in Google Scholar

27. Lam, WK, Chan, L, Sutherland, D, Manasseh, R, Moinuddin, K, Ooi, A. Effect of stratification on the propagation of a cylindrical gravity current. J Fluid Mech 2024;983:A43. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.98.Search in Google Scholar

28. Daniel, YS, Aziz, ZA, Ismail, Z, Salah, F. Thermal stratification effects on MHD radiative flow of nanofluid over nonlinear stretching sheet with variable thickness. J Comput Des Eng 2018;5:232–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2017.09.001.Search in Google Scholar

29. Muzammal, M, Farooq, M, Hashim, Moussa, SB, Nasr, S. Melting heat transfer of a quadratic stratified Jeffrey nanofluid flow with inclined magnetic field and thermophoresis. Alex Eng J 2024;103:158–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

30. Ijaz, M, Ayub, M. Activation energy and dual stratification effects for Walter-B fluid flow in view of Cattaneo–Christov double diffusion. Heliyon 2019;5:e01815.10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01815Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Nield, DA, Bejan, A. Heat transfer through a porous medium. In: Convection in porous media. New York: Springer; 2017:37–55 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-49562-0_2Search in Google Scholar

32. Mahmud, S, Fraser, RA. Flow, thermal, and entropy generation characteristics inside a porous channel with viscous dissipation. Int J Therm Sci 2005;44:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2004.05.001.Search in Google Scholar

33. Umavathi, JC, Liu, IC, Shekar, M. Unsteady mixed convective heat transfer of two immiscible fluids confined between long vertical wavy wall and parallel flat wall. Appl Math Mech 2012;33:931–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-012-1596-6.Search in Google Scholar

34. Abbasi, FM, Shehzad, SA, Hayat, T, Ahmad, B. Doubly stratified mixed convection flow of Maxwell nanofluid with heat generation/absorption. J Magn Magn Mater 2016;404:159–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.11.090.Search in Google Scholar

35. Bilal, M, Ramzan, M, Mehmood, Y, Kbiri Alaoui, M, Chinram, R. An entropy optimization study of non-Darcian magnetohydrodynamic Williamson nanofluid with nonlinear thermal radiation over a stratified sheet. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part E 2021;235:1883–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089211027989.Search in Google Scholar

36. Khan, MI, Kiyani, MZ, Hayat, T, Javed, MF, Ahmad, I. Double stratified stagnation-point flow of Williamson nanomaterial with entropy generation through a porous medium. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 2020;30:1899–922. https://doi.org/10.1108/hff-11-2018-0650.Search in Google Scholar

37. Atif, SM, Hussain, S, Sagheer, M. Effect of thermal radiation on MHD micropolar Carreau nanofluid with viscous dissipation, Joule heating, and internal heating. Sci Iran 2019;26:3875–88.10.24200/sci.2019.51653.2294Search in Google Scholar

38. Javed, MA, Ghaffari, A, Khan, SU, Elattar, E. Numerical analysis of the blade coating process using non-Newtonian nanofluid with magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) and slip effects. Macromol Theory Simulations 2024;33:2400017. https://doi.org/10.1002/mats.202400017.Search in Google Scholar

39. Sahreen, A, Ahmad, A, Alruwaili, A, Nawaz, R. Influencing heat transfer and drag in magneto-hydrodynamic non-Newtonian fluids with polymer additives: a novel theoretical approach. Numer Heat Transfer Part A 2024;87:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2024.2383836.Search in Google Scholar

40. Tharapatla, G, Rajakumari, P, Reddy, RGV. Heat and mass transfer effects on MHD non-Newtonian fluids flow through an inclined thermally-stratified porous medium. World J Eng 2023;20:117–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/wje-02-2021-0099.Search in Google Scholar

41. Khan, MS, Ahmad, S, Shah, Z, Alshehri, A, Vrinceanu, N, Garalleh, HAL. Computational study of double diffusive MHD natural convection flow of non-Newtonian fluid between concentric cylinders. Results Eng 2024;21:101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101925.Search in Google Scholar

42. Venthan, SM, Kumar, PS, Kumar, SS, Sudarsan, S, Rangasamy, G. A computational study of the impact of fluid flow characteristics on convective heat transfer with Hall current using the MHD non-Newtonian fluid model. Chem Eng Res Des 2024;203:789–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2024.02.013.Search in Google Scholar

43. Atif, SM, Hussain, S, Sagheer, M. Effect of thermal radiation and variable thermal conductivity on magnetohydrodynamics squeezed flow of Carreau fluid over a sensor surface. J Nanofluids 2019;8:806–16. https://doi.org/10.1166/jon.2019.1621.Search in Google Scholar

44. Sohail, M, Rafique, E, Abodayeh, K. Boundary layer analysis on magnetohydrodynamic dissipative Williamson nanofluid past over an exponentially stretched porous sheet by engaging OHAM. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct 2024;20:973–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/mmms-04-2024-0106.Search in Google Scholar

45. Rehman, A, Khan, D, Mahariq, I, Elkotb, MA, Elnaqeeb, T. Viscous dissipation effects on time-dependent MHD Casson nanofluid over stretching surface: a hybrid nanofluid study. J Mol Liq 2024;408:125370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2024.125370.Search in Google Scholar

46. Priyadharshini, P, Karpagam, V, Shah, NA, Alshehri, MH. Bio-convection effects of MHD Williamson fluid flow over a symmetrically stretching sheet: machine learning. Symmetry 2023;15:1684. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15091684.Search in Google Scholar

47. Maxwell, JC. A treatise on electricity and magnetism. New York: Clarendon Press; 1873, vol 1.Search in Google Scholar

48. Choi, SUS, Eastman, JA. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. USA: Argonne National Laboratory; 1995.10.1115/IMECE1995-0926Search in Google Scholar

49. Anwar, MS. Heat transfer in MHD convective stagnation point flow over a stretching surface with thermal radiations. Numer Heat Transfer Part A 2025;86:3130–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2023.2299289.Search in Google Scholar

50. Puneeth, V, Sarpabhushana, M, Anwar, MS, Aly, EH, Gireesha, BJ. Impact of bioconvection on the free stream flow of a pseudoplastic nanofluid past a rotating cone. Heat Transfer 2022;51:4544–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.22512.Search in Google Scholar

51. Yu, L, Li, Y, Puneeth, V, Znaidia, S, Shah, NA, Manjunatha, S, et al.. Heat transfer optimisation through viscous ternary nanofluid flow over a stretching/shrinking thin needle. Numer Heat Transfer Part A 2025;86:518–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2023.2267750.Search in Google Scholar

52. Irfan, M, Muhammad, T, Rashid, M, Anwar, MS, Abas, SS, Narayana, PVS. Numerical study of nonlinear thermal radiation and Joule heating on MHD bioconvection Carreau nanofluid with gyrotactic microorganisms. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 2025;18:101254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101254.Search in Google Scholar

53. Khan, WA, Anjum, N, Hussain, I, Ali, M, Saleem, S, Mohammed, RS. Thermo-physical properties of non-linear radiative flow of magnetized Ellis fluid comprising analysis of oxytactic microorganisms and nano-enhanced phase materials. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 2024;17:101128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101128.Search in Google Scholar

54. Hussain, M, Ali, B, Awan, AU, Alharthi, M, Alrashedi, Y. Role of nanoparticle radius for heat transfer optimization in MHD dusty fluid across stretching sheet. J Therm Anal Calorim 2024;149:15179–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13738-9.Search in Google Scholar

55. Shree, SU, Hanumagowda, BN, Saini, G, Singh, K, Kulshreshta, A, Varma, SVK, et al.. Heat and mass transfer in electrically conducting hybrid nanofluid flow between two rotating parallel stretching surfaces: an entropy analysis. Multiscale Multidiscip Model Exp Des 2025;8:18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-024-00635-9.Search in Google Scholar

56. Alharbi, AF, Usman, M, Areshi, M, Mahariq, I. Nanoconfined multiscale heat transfer analysis of hybrid nanofluid flow with magnetohydrodynamic effect and porous surface interaction. Multiscale Multidiscip Model Exp Des 2025;8:34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-024-00602-4.Search in Google Scholar

57. Awan, AU, Ali, B, Shah, SAA, Oreijah, M, Guedri, K, Eldin, SM. Numerical analysis of heat transfer in Ellis hybrid nanofluid flow subject to a stretching cylinder. Case Stud Therm Eng 2023;49:103222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103222.Search in Google Scholar

58. Rushi Kumar, B, Sowmiya, C, Nagarathnam, S, Shivakumara, IS. Rheological analysis and heat transfer enhancement of Williamson nanofluid in mixed convection flow over a stretching cylinder/plate. Eur Phys J Plus 2024;139:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05443-1.Search in Google Scholar

59. Sowmiya, C, Kumar, BR. Numerical investigation of magnetic field and radiative heat flux on rheological behavior of Williamson nanofluid in a stretching cylinder. Therm Sci Eng Prog 2024;53:102772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102772.Search in Google Scholar

60. Kanimozhi, N, Vijayaragavan, R, Rushi Kumar, B. Impacts of multiple slip on magnetohydrodynamic Williamson and Maxwell nanofluid over a stretching sheet saturated in a porous medium. Numer Heat Transfer Part B 2024;85:344–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407790.2023.2235079.Search in Google Scholar

61. Geetha, R, Reddappa, B, Tarakaramu, N, Rushi Kumar, B, Khan, MI. Effect of double stratification on MHD Williamson boundary layer flow and heat transfer across a shrinking/stretching sheet immersed in a porous medium. Int J Chem Eng 2024;2024:9983489. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9983489.Search in Google Scholar

62. Atif, SM. Effect of linear thermal radiation and magnetohydrodynamics on non-Newtonian fluids. Islamabad: Capital University; 2020.Search in Google Scholar

63. Na, TY. Computational methods in engineering boundary value problems. New York: Academic Press; 1980.Search in Google Scholar

64. Khan, MI, Qayyum, S, Hayat, T, Khan, MI, Alsaedi, A, Khan, TA. Entropy generation in radiative motion of tangent hyperbolic nanofluid in presence of activation energy and nonlinear mixed convection. Phys Lett A 2018;382:2017–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2018.05.021.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-06-21
Accepted: 2026-01-22
Published Online: 2026-03-16

© 2026 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Green fabrication of γ- Al2O3 bionanomaterials using Coriandrum sativum plant extract and its photocatalytic and antibacterial activity
  2. Research Articles
  3. Dual nanofiller strategy for enhanced mechanical properties in carbon fiber reinforced polyamide blends
  4. Hydrothermal synthesis of Ricinus communis seed extract-mediated CQDs and their applications as antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and photocatalytic agents
  5. Mechanical and thermal characterization of Kevlar–Basalt hybrid composites reinforced with Al2O3 nanoparticles
  6. A dual-responsive Luteolin nanoparticles suppresses colorectal cancer growth by targeting tumor angiogenesis
  7. Heat and mass transfer in MHD-UCM nanofluid flow past a porous nonlinear stretching sheet with chemical reaction and bioconvection: a dual-method approach
  8. Orally administered dual-responsive insulin nanomedicine for diabetes and diabetic retinopathy
  9. Comparative RSM-based study of nano, hybrid, and ternary nanofluid heat transfer with Cattaneo–Christov flux in porous media
  10. Yttrium-doped copper oxide nanoparticles: potential therapeutic applications in metabolic, neurodegenerative, arthritic, and diabetic disorders
  11. Green synthesis of alginate-encapsulated silver nanoparticles and its utilization as anticancer and antimicrobial therapeutics
  12. Improving bending fatigue lifetime and interfacial adhesion of Cu–Mn flexible interconnects using self-forming nanolayer
  13. Fe-doped ZIF-8 for sunlight-driven photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue: synthesis, characterization, and AI-based process modeling
  14. Synthesis, characterization and biological activity of metal nanoparticles with green method using apple industry waste
  15. Synthesis of multifunctional chitosan-zinc oxide composite film with antimicrobial activity for packaging applications
  16. Drop-casted Ag2O:MnO2-nanocomposite thin-films-based gas sensors for improved sensitivity CH4 and NH3 gases: fabrication and unveiling of microstructural morphology, optical, and gas sensing characterizations
  17. Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous systems using jujube tree branch biochar-loaded nano zero-valent iron
  18. Numerical study of thermal and solutal stratification via Williamson nanofluid model with Cattaneo–Christove heat flux
  19. Bioinspired synthesis of AgO-ZnO nanocomposite via Cucumis melo leaves: a green catalyst for efficient malachite green degradation and antibacterial applications
  20. Review Articles
  21. Integrating spatial analysis in the study of silver nanoparticles for radiotherapy: from molecular mechanisms to bio distribution in biological systems
  22. Review of thermal conductivity of gold nanoparticle composites
  23. Nanogenerators for energy harvesting: a holistic review of mechanisms, materials, and emerging applications
  24. Nanoparticles as SERS substrates: recent progress in hormone sensing
  25. Special Issue on Green Nanotechnology and Nano-materials for Environ. Sust.
  26. Green synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: a pathway to sustainable energy and sensing applications
Downloaded on 30.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2025-0277/html
Scroll to top button