Startseite Smart mesoporous silica nanoparticles for controlled-release drug delivery
Artikel Open Access

Smart mesoporous silica nanoparticles for controlled-release drug delivery

  • Mahdi Karimi , Hamed Mirshekari , Masoumeh Aliakbari , Parham Sahandi-Zangabad und Michael R. Hamblin EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 21. Januar 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Stimuli-responsive controlled-release nanocarriers are promising vehicles for delivery of bioactive molecules that can minimize side effects and maximize efficiency. The release of the drug occurs when the nanocarrier is triggered by an internal or external stimulus. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) can have drugs and bioactive cargos loaded into the high-capacity pores, and their release can be triggered by activation of a variety of stimulus-responsive molecular “gatekeepers” or “nanovalves.” In this mini-review, we discuss the basic concepts of MSN in targeted drug-release systems and cover different stimulus-responsive gatekeepers. Internal stimuli include redox, enzymes, and pH, while external stimuli include light, ultrasound, and magnetic fields, and temperature can either be internal or external.

1 Introduction

Advances in nano-biotechnology are providing many new concepts for targeted and controlled release of therapeutic molecules. Smart nanocarriers have been designed with stimulus-responsive moieties that can trigger cargo release only when and where it is required [1]. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) feature prominently in the range of nanocarriers used in Nanomedicine. MSNs were first introduced as drug delivery systems (DDS) in 2001 [2]. The unique properties of these inorganic nanomaterials, such as their nontoxic nature, high pore volume, no concerns with chemical or biological safety, the ability to functionalize the surface, and good biocompatibility, all combine to make them an ideal nanocarrier for DDS [3].

The presence of silanol groups on the silica surface allows good interactions with the phospholipid bilayers of living cells and stimulates endocytosis. The surface properties of MSN enhances their biocompatibility compared to other nanocarriers composed of metals or nanocarbon [4]. The surface properties of silica allow different types of functionalization to be applied in order improve the targeted delivery of therapeutic molecules [5]. Furthermore, the high stability of Si-O bonds protects the silica nanocarriers from biological degradation and lessens the requirement for other stabilizers such as the covalent cross-linking needed for proteins [6, 7].

The mesoporous spatial structure of silica leads to a high-capacity “honeycomb” structure that can be loaded with high concentrations of therapeutic compounds and can subsequently carry them higher to their targeted tissues, thereby reducing drug side effects by preventing drug leakage into the bloodstream [8]. Moreover, the surface properties of silica enable ready functionalization to enhance the loading and releasing of cargos [9]. A further advantage of MSN is that they can be generated through a simple and low-cost process, and their properties such as pore size and the diameter and shape of the nanoparticles can be controlled via the reversible condensation reaction that makes it possible to tailor the silica nanostructures [1012].

Different types of precursors are used as a source of the silica in the synthesis procedure. Glyceroxysilanes and glyceroxysiloxanes are unaffected by pH, but are affected by ionic concentration and are not suitable for long-term storage [13]. Orthosilicic acid, owing to its slow reaction rate, requiring long preparation times, is not used anymore [14]. Tetraethyl orthosilicate and tetramethoxysilane, owing to their poor water solubility and a requirement for organic solvents and high temperatures, have only received limited use [15, 16]. Tetrakis (2-hydroxyethylorthosilicate has good biocompatibility, is water soluble, can form gels at relatively low temperatures, and has, therefore, been commonly used in many studies [17].

2 Design of MSN

The efficiency of drug loading and release of MSN depends strongly on the mesopore volume and diameter [18] and on chemical features characteristic of the surface functionalization [19]. The overall diameter of the nanovehicles is important because it governs the uptake into targeted cells, delivery of the drugs into the cytoplasm after uptake, and in the case of nucleic acid delivery into the nucleus [20]. As in many cases, the nanocarriers need to be small enough for endocytosis, the drug-loading capacity in each MSN is limited, but can be optimized by the preparation process and the chemical modification. Drug loading into MSNs mainly takes place via two methods: during synthesis of NPs or after synthesis of the nanocarrier, known as “post-sorption” [21]. Small drugs can be absorbed into the pores though physical adsorption. Surface Si-OH groups of the silica play a major role in this adsorption by providing two to four linking sites per nm. Positively charged water-soluble cargos can be loaded into the surface of the MSNs by ionic interactions, owing to the constitutive negative charge on MSN in physiological conditions. The efficiency of loading might be improved by the modification of the MSN surface by the addition of functional groups such as amines or carboxylic acids. On the other hand, hydrophobic drugs, which need to be dissolved in organic solvents, are transferred from the solvent into the MSN during the preparation process and are then fixed by removing the solvent by vacuum drying. The most important point to be taken into account in drug loading is the prevention of drug release prior to the vehicle reaching the active site. To this end, the drugs can be linked into the framework via a cleavable covalent linking bond, or the pore entrances can be sealed by adding stimuli-responsive removable caps after loading [22].

Generally, the diameter of MSN varies from 50 to 450 nm. Studies have shown that MSN with diameters below 300 nm are favorable for delivery of therapeutic compounds through endocytosis [23], but in the case of larger particles, phagocytosis is the predominant mechanism of cell uptake. Larger nanoparticles may not be taken up into cells at all and are more likely to stimulate immune response [24].

According to the particular structure of the drug or other cargo, the dimensions and volume of the pores in the MSN would be different. The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) has classified porous solid materials according to their pore diameter; if the diameter of pores is <2 nm, they are called “microporous,” in contrast, if the diameter of pores is >50 nm, they are called “macroporous,” and materials with a pore diameter between 2 and 50 nm are called “mesoporous” [25]. By increasing the mesoporosity, the loading efficiency and drug-carrying capacity will increase [26]. The honeycomb structure that can be tailored by preparation method and by functionalization is the most interesting feature of MSN [27].

To design a MSN with a desired morphology, structural components such as amphiphilic block copolymers and surfactant molecules play a major role. Broadly speaking, the morphology of MSN is spherical in shape. The overall structure of MSN can be divided into three distinct parts that can be independently functionalized for different purposes; the silica framework can be modified by attaching imaging agents to track the MSN for diagnostic purposes, the mesoporous structure and nanochannels can be linked to the bioactive molecules and drugs, and the outer surface posesses several silanol groups that can bind to different ligands to allow targeted delivery [28]. This basic overall structure is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Basic structure of MSN.
Figure 1:

Basic structure of MSN.

The surface of MSN contains a high number of Si-OH groups providing an attachment site for different types of functionalization [29]. These functional groups are important to control the charge present on the MSN surface, to allow loading with hydrophobic and/or hydrophilic drugs, and affect the loading efficiency of drugs. Some functional groups such as aromatic rings induce hydrophobicity on the surface of the MSN, thereby, preventing the loading with polar compounds into the mesopores [30, 31]. Additionally, the molecular dimensions of functional groups on the pore surface can directly influence the pore diameter; therefore, the size of the pores can be controlled by functionalization. On the other hand, these functional groups can be linked to other molecules such as fluorescent or other reporter molecules or to stimulus-responsive moieties [32]. The combination of these unique properties of MSN makes them promising vehicles for delivery of a variety of therapeutic compounds into targeted tissues and cells.

3 Smart MSN in drug delivery

After systemic administration of therapeutic drugs or other compounds, the molecules will distribute to all organs and parts of the body. Some natural protective systems such as the reticulo-endothelial system (RES) and the blood brain barrier are designed to prevent any damage to vital organs such as the liver, heart, kidney, and brain from these circulating exogenous compounds [33]. Therefore, in the design of a smart nanocarrier, two main requirements exist; first, the targeted delivery of an active compound with penetration through membranes and endocytosis to reach to the target site, and second, the ability of the carrier to escape from biological protective mechanisms such as opsonization and RES clearance. For smart nanocarriers, there is the need for modification and functionalization of their surface with moieties that are responsive to a range of different stimuli. These stimuli can be endogenous factors such as, redox [34], enzyme [35], and pH [36], or exogenous factors such as light [37], ultra sound, and magnetic fields [38, 39], or to temperature [40] that can either be endogenous or exogenous. Table 1 has summarized examples of different stimuli-responsive MSN.

Table 1

Examples of stimuli-responsive MSN and some selected properties.

StimulusNP platformSurface modificationMechanism of actionApplicationDrug loading methodDiameterReferences
RedoxMSN-SS-PEG@RhBGatekeeper: polyethylene glycol (PEG) linked by disulfide bond to the MSN surfaceDisulfide bond can be cleaved with high concentration of glutathioneCargo release in reducing conditionsStirring in the solution100 nm[41]
EnzymeDOX@MSN-GFLGR7RGDS/α-CDGatekeeper: azido-GFLGR7RGDS with tumor-targeting, membrane-penetrating, and cathepsin B-responsive functionsRGDS is tumor-targeting agent, and GFLG is a target for cathepsin B, which removes the cap, and drug is releasedGrowth inhibition toward αv-β3-positive HeLa cancer cellsFree diffusion of the drug from solvent into carrier130 nm[42]
pHFITC-Fe3O4-capped-MSNsCap: reversible boronate ester linkerThe boronate ester is hydrolyzed and cap is removedDrug tracking with FITC labeling and drug release in MC3T3-E1 cell modelFree diffusion of the drug from solvent into carrier100 nm[43]
MagneticMMSN-NIPAMGatekeeper: thermo-responsive copolymer of poly(ethyleneimine)-b-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)Remote magnetic field by increasing temperature changes the gate keeper and releases the drugRemotely triggering the release of different therapeutic agents and contrast agents for MRIFree diffusion of the drug from solvent into carrier50–100 nm[44]
TemperatureDOX-MSN-DNA-CuSGatekeeper: CuS bound to DNA strand, and the complementary strand on MSN provide reversible cappingHeating separates the two strands of DNA and cap is removedLocal drug release under control of heat stimulationFree diffusion of the drug from solvent into carrier and capping by DNA hybridization70-120 nm[45]

3.1 Redox-responsive MSN

The difference between the reduction potential in the intracellular and extracellular environments provides an opportunity to design nanoparticles that are specific for intracellular delivery [46]. The high concentration of glutathione in the intracellular milieu is the main reason for this difference; this is only 2–20 μm in the body fluids, while it is as high as 0.5–10 mm inside the cells [47]. Cancer tissues contain low concentrations of oxygen compared to normal tissue, and the concentration of GSH in cancer cells is at least four times higher than GSH in normal physiologic microenvironments [48]. In the presence of high concentration of glutathione, the thiol group of the cysteine residue acts as an electron donor and is responsible for the antioxidant scavenging activity of GSH. In reducing conditions, the thiol group donates an electron to the unstable disulfide bond of the gatekeepers in MSN. The reduced disulfide bond is broken down, the gatekeeper is removed, and two molecules of glutathione become joined together by a new disulfide bond as a GS-SG molecule [49]. Figure 2 illustrates the basic mechanism for the redox responsivity of MSN.

Figure 2: Redox-responsive MSN: disulfide bonds are broken at a high concentration of GSH, and the caps (here PEG molecules) are removed, and the loaded dye is released. Reused from Reference [41] with the permission of Elsevier publisher.
Figure 2:

Redox-responsive MSN: disulfide bonds are broken at a high concentration of GSH, and the caps (here PEG molecules) are removed, and the loaded dye is released. Reused from Reference [41] with the permission of Elsevier publisher.

The surface of MSN, due to the intrinsic property of silica, possesses an overall negative charge and can be easily noncovalently linked to cationic polymers or molecules such as the amphiphilic peptide RGD, IL13, collagen, polyethyleneimine (PEI), and poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) that can all act as a “cap” for sealing the MSN pores [50]. Wang et al. used amphiphilic polymers to function as a gatekeeper in doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded MSN. In this MSN, first, a stearic acid derivative (Cys-C1s) was attached though a disulfide linkage, to the surface of MSN, then an RGD sequence to target Integrin αv (3 (C18-DSDSDSDSRGDS) was linked via a hydrophobic interaction with the octadecyl group, and finally, DOX was loaded into the modified MSN pores. RGD targeted the MSN to the tumor neovasculature, and then, the cap was removed due to cleavage of disulfide bound by intracellular redox conditions, and anticancer drug DOX was released inside the cells [51].

In a recent study, Li et al. [52] generated MSN-SH with a mesopore diameter of 2.64 nm by using a co-condensation method, then attached S-(2-aminoethylthio)-2-thiopyridine hydrochloride to produce MSN-S-S-NH2. This structure was then reacted with propargyl bromide to obtain MSN-S-S-NH-alkyne. This particle was then attached to an azidopeptide via “click chemistry” to generate MSN-S-S-RGD. The MSN was then loaded with DOX that showed good responsivity to the presence of GSH in tumor cells. Furthermore, Sun et al. [53] used redox stimulus-responsive MSN to inhibit cancer by suppressing neovascularization and encouraging vascular normalization. For this purpose, they immobilized PEI through disulfide bond formation onto the surface of siRNA-loaded MSN to increase the RNA half-life and its penetration into targeted cancer cells. The MSN-siRNA/CrPEI showed an efficient intracellular gene delivery and therapeutic effect on the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway.

3.2 Enzyme-responsive MSN

Enzymes have unique properties such as their isoelectric pH, exquisite substrate specificity, greater expression in particular organs and in subcellular organelles and can have large changes in concentration in inflammation and disease states. Proteases have a critical role in intracellular delivery [54], and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) can be specific for the cancer microenvironment [55]. The concentration of elastase is increased in inflammation [56], and phospholipases are overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and can be used for antibiotic delivery [57]. Oxidoreductases also are taken advantage of in oxidase-responsive DDS [58]. MSN can be tailored to respond to these different enzymes by changing the linkers and capping agents on their functionalized surface.

Van Rijid’s group [54] coated the external the surface of MSN with a hepatopeptide that contained a biotin group linked to the amino acid sequence SWMGLP, which can be recognized by MMP9. The enzyme MMP9 is a matrix metalloproteinase that breaks down the extracellular matrix in physiological conditions, and many basic functions of cells depend on this enzyme, such as embryonic and bone development, cell migration, and wound healing responses. MMP9 is frequently overexpressed on malignant cancer cells, where it is responsible for tissue invasion and metastasis. After loading of the mesopores with the anticancer drug cisplatin, the protein avidin was attached to the biotin as a bulky gatekeeper to keep the loaded drug in the MSN pores. In the presence of MMP9 on the surface of lung cancer cells, the peptide sequence was cleaved by the enzyme, and the drug was released to the cancer cells. In a similar study, Xu et al. [55] coated MSN with a gelatin corona susceptible to degradation by MMP for delivery of DOX into HT-29 human colon carcinoma cells and suggested that the same MSN could be used for delivery of different drugs into different cells.

In an interesting study, Li et al. [59] attached an oligocationic TAT nucleus-penetrating peptide to the surface of drug-loaded MSN and neutralized it with a cleavable anionic peptide. In the cancer cells and in the presence of cathepsin B, the anionic peptide was cleaved, and the carrier was transferred into the nucleus by the penetrating peptide. Therefore, the anticancer drug was released directly into the nucleus. This strategy could be an efficient system for drug-resistant tumor therapy. Figure 3 depicts the basis of this strategy.

Figure 3: Schematic mechanism of nucleus-targeted drug delivery; MSN was synthesized by quantum dot method and TAT sequence along with cathepsin B-responsive peptide attached to its surface. Inside the cancer cell, the enzyme cuts the responsive peptide, and the nucleus-penetrating agent guided the carrier to the nucleus. Reused from Reference [59] with the permission of John Wiley and Sons’ publisher.
Figure 3:

Schematic mechanism of nucleus-targeted drug delivery; MSN was synthesized by quantum dot method and TAT sequence along with cathepsin B-responsive peptide attached to its surface. Inside the cancer cell, the enzyme cuts the responsive peptide, and the nucleus-penetrating agent guided the carrier to the nucleus. Reused from Reference [59] with the permission of John Wiley and Sons’ publisher.

Mondragon et al. [60] used a nontoxic lysine polymer with an ε-amino group linkage for capping the MSN, which was biodegradable by amidases. They showed this gatekeeper had a zero cargo release when the protease was absent, but after it was taken up by HeLa cells, the cargo was efficiently released into lysosomes under the action of proteases. Recently, Cheng et al. [42] designed a three-segment oligopeptide-conjugated rotaxane MSN. This oligopeptide consisted of a RGGS tumor-targeting peptide, a sequence of seven arginine residues as a cell-penetrating peptide, and a GFLG enzyme-cleavable peptide. This nanocarrier bound to the integrin αvβ3 that was overexpressed in cancerous cells and was internalized into the cells by the arginine sequence. Inside the cells, the GFLG peptide was cleaved by cathepsin B, and 80% of the loaded drug was rapidly released inside the cell.

3.3 pH-responsive MSN

The high rate of glycolysis in cancerous cells, leading to the production of lactic acid and carbon dioxide directly results in their having a relatively low pH that can be used as an endogenous stimulus for targeted drug release. This biochemical characteristic of abnormal cells has been utilized as a strategy to design an appropriate gatekeeper on the MSN surface and tunnels that could be triggered in response to an acidic environment.

Polyelectrolyte polymers formed from repeating monomer units bearing electrolyte groups can either be absorbed or covalently bonded to the surface of MSN. They act as stimulus-responsive release systems by virtue of their structural transformation in response to different pH values. The multilayered polyelectrolytes formed from PAH/PSS were used to modify MSN by Shi et al. [61]. The positive charge of PAH coated the negatively charged surface of the MSN. The negatively charged PSS, then, was added to PAH. Their results showed that gentamicin molecules could be stored within MSN pores and released in response to pH changes in the range of 2–8. The basic principle of pH-responsive drug release is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Basic concept of drug release under acidic conditions. Reused from Reference [43] with the permission of Elsevier.
Figure 4:

Basic concept of drug release under acidic conditions. Reused from Reference [43] with the permission of Elsevier.

Three different forms of MSN (carboxylated mesoporous silica (MSN-COOH), animated MSN (MSN-NH2), and hollow MSN (H-MSN)) were used by Gao et al. [62] to load anticancer drugs. Using cationic and anionic polyelectrolyte-coated MSN provided an opportunity for loading different types of bioactive molecules through the layer-by-layer method. Positive-charged drugs were loaded better into MSN-COOH, whereas MSN-NH2 was more suitable for anionic drugs, while H-MSN exhibited a high capacity to load both types of drugs. Their results showed great potential as a pH-responsive DDS.

Supramolecular species such as β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) and proteins can act as another type of gatekeeper in pH-responsive MSN. An interesting study was carried out by Meng et al. in which a series of aromatic amines were used as a stalk to attach to MSN, and then, β-CD was attached to the stalk to prevent cargo release at normal pH. In acidic environments (pH<6), however, the stalk lost its attachment due to protonation of the aromatic amines, and the cargo was released immediately upon opening of the nanovalves. The cell lines THP-1 and KB-31 were studied in their in vitro investigations. The THP-1 macrophages took up the ingested particles into the lysosomal compartment, and KB-31 was a cancer cell model to test the efficacy of the procedure [63].

pH-sensitive linkers such as acetal, ester, and hydrazine bonds have also been utilized in the design of smart MSN. These bonds can be used to attach bulky groups to cover the MSN pores, thus, preventing drug release at a pH about 7.4 as in the blood circulation. Recently, acetalated dextran (a polysaccharide with water-soluble characteristic achieved by hydrolysis of starch or glycogen) was used by Huang et al. to produce pH-sensitive MSN. The water solubility of the dextran could be modified by attaching cholesterol as a lipid soluble moiety. By modifying MSN with CaCO3, another kind of pH-sensitive MSN was produced to produce acid-triggered release of the drugs, DOX and ibuprofen. Their results showed that the CaCO3 coating dissociated in acidic conditions, and the drug was released rapidly. At physiological pH by contrast, the release of the loaded drug occurred very slowly [64].

3.4 Light-responsive MSN

Light responsiveness has been suggested to be a promising strategy for external stimulus-triggered drug release due to the noninvasive nature and the ability to remotely control it from outside. Near-infrared (NIR) light is a safe wavelength range and is able to deeply penetrate into tissue without any hazardous effect on the internal organs [65]. The main mechanisms of light-triggered drug release are (a) a photothermal increase of temperature at the site of irradiation with a corresponding change in the steric structure; and (b) photoisomerization of a light-sensitive molecule. Some studies have shown that the coating of the MSN with more hydrophobic materials can enhance its response to light [66].

Li’s group constructed an NIR light-responsive nanovalve on the surface of MSN-coated gold nanorods by using sulfonatocalix [4] arene (SC [4] A) attached to a quaternary ammonium stalk as a capping switch. In this nanocarrier, the energy of NIR light was converted to heat by the plasmonic absorption by the gold nanorod core and the binding between the quaternary ammonium salt and the SC [4] A was weakened, leading to removal of the capping agent from the surface of the MSN pore, and drug was released [65]. In a similar approach, Lui et al. [67] used single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) as a light-absorbing agent attached to MSN. They found that the light absorbing material could absorb energy converting it to heat and cause drug release. They coated MSN with SWCNT and functionalized them with polyethylene glycol (PEG) to enhance biocompatibility, solubility, and the stability of the nanocarrier in physiological conditions. The loaded drug was released after exposure of HeLa cells to NIR light. This strategy is depicted in Figure 5. Further studies indicated that noncovalent binding of the capping agents was able to prevent drug release and enhanced the light-mediated response. Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) noncovalently assembled onto the surface of alkyl chain-functionalized MSN could be disassembled by remote irradiation with NIR light [68].

Figure 5: (A) Synthetic route to SWCNT@MS-MEG showing the preparation of mesoporous silica, its pegylation, and addition of CNT to construct the complete SWCNT@MS-MEG. (B) TEM image of the nanoparticles before pegylation. (C) Illustration of desorption and adsorption of cargo and its corresponding pore size. Reused from Reference [67] with permission of John Wiley and Sons’ publisher.
Figure 5:

(A) Synthetic route to SWCNT@MS-MEG showing the preparation of mesoporous silica, its pegylation, and addition of CNT to construct the complete SWCNT@MS-MEG. (B) TEM image of the nanoparticles before pegylation. (C) Illustration of desorption and adsorption of cargo and its corresponding pore size. Reused from Reference [67] with permission of John Wiley and Sons’ publisher.

In an interesting work, Wang’s group designed a reversible nano valve that was responsive to near-UV irradiation. In this system, α-cyclodextrin was attached to the trans-form of azobenzene. Trans-azobenzene was isomerized under near-UV light to the cis-form, which forced the release of cyclodextrin, and the cargo was released during light irradiation. When the light irradiation ceased, the azobenzene returned to the trans-form, and as a result, the cyclodextrin again bound to the porous surface. This system represents the first reversible drug-release system triggered by light [69].

3.5 Magnetic-responsive MSN

This idea, that the use of an external magnetic field could be a stimulus for drug release, was first suggested by Freeman in 1960 [70]. The entrapment of magnetic materials within MSN can be carried out by three different mechanisms that control the diameter, morphology, and structure of magnetic MSN. These strategies are 1) magnetic nanocrystals are embedded in the core and surrounded by an MSN shell; 2) a large magnetic core is embedded in a sandwich-like structure with MSN surrounding it; 3) hollow MSN can contain magnetic nanocrystals like a baby’s rattle [28]. These three mechanisms are depicted in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Mechanisms of magnetic core entrapment in MSN shells. (a) Schematic construction mechanism; (b) TEM image of magnetic core nanoparticles; (c) TEM image of nanoparticle after pore formation. Reused from Reference [28] with permission of John Wiley and Sons’ publisher.
Figure 6:

Mechanisms of magnetic core entrapment in MSN shells. (a) Schematic construction mechanism; (b) TEM image of magnetic core nanoparticles; (c) TEM image of nanoparticle after pore formation. Reused from Reference [28] with permission of John Wiley and Sons’ publisher.

External magnetic fields are nontoxic, have a high ability to penetrate living organisms without any physical interaction with internal tissues [31]. As magnetic fields do not interact with living systems, they can be used for external guidance of magnetic nanocarriers, as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for tissue heating via application of alternating magnetic fields, and for triggering drug release. Application of magnetic fields can increase the cellular uptake of magnetic NP in a process known as “magetofection” [44, 71]. Magnetic field-induced heating might increase the temperature of the surrounding environment and have a synergistic effect on drug release and cancer therapy. One strategy to use this hyperthermia property is the entrapment of magnetic materials in the core of MSN. Dong’s group stabilized Fe3O4 NP within a silica layer. Then, hexadecyltrimethyammonium bromide (CTAB) was used as a surfactant, combined with mesitylene to cause swelling of the pores to generate M-MSN-CTAB. Next, the CTAB was removed by treatment with 3-(trim-thoxysily) propyl methacrylate (MPS) to graft vinyl groups on the external surface of the MSN nanoparticles. The removal of CTAB in an ammonia-ethanol solution led to pore formation in MSN. Finally, a smart thermoresponsive polymer, poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide) (PNIPAAm), was added as a gatekeeper to the pores. The Fe3O4 under an alternating magnetic field absorbed energy and generated heat. After the temperature was increased, the outer chains of PNIPAAm absorbed more water and became soluble, the pores became unblocked, and the loaded cargo was released [72]. The strategy is depicted in Figure 7.

Figure 7: Schematic illustration of M-MSN-PNIPAAm preparation, functionalization, and drug release mechanism. Reused from Reference [72] with permission of John Wiley and Sons’ publisher.
Figure 7:

Schematic illustration of M-MSN-PNIPAAm preparation, functionalization, and drug release mechanism. Reused from Reference [72] with permission of John Wiley and Sons’ publisher.

In a similar approach, Thomas et al. covered zinc-doped iron oxide nanocrystals (ZnNC) inside the MSN and modified its surface by attaching pseudorotaxanes as a thermal-sensitive gatekeeper. The presence of ZnNC significantly improved the thermal responsivity four times, and the MRI contrast was increased 10 times compared to free iron oxide nanocrystals [73]. The unique structural properties of the MSN provided the possibility to combine magnetic sensitivity with temperature sensitivity as discussed above. This strategy has led to a generation of different MSN-based nanocarriers with magnetic cores and stimulus-sensitive nanovalves. For example, Lee’s group [74] used three different reactions; sol-gel reaction, solvothermal reaction, and amide coupling reaction, to construct magnetic core MSN with nanovalves composed of crown-ether macrocycles as ultrasound responsive moiteties and with CTAB as pH-responsive gatekeepers. This Fe3O4@SiO2@CTAB-SiO2-NH2 MSN showed efficient multiresponsive behavior (i.e. ultrasound, pH, and magnetic responsivity) when both internal and external stimuli could be used.

3.6 Temperature-responsive MSN

Utilizing thermoresponsive MSN is another approach for targeted release of the drug that can be triggered by both external and internal stimulation. This concept was reported in 2003 for the first time. One of the characteristic properties of tumor tissues (caused by high metabolism rates and inflammation) is their higher temperature compared to normal tissue. Therefore, using phase-change polymers with melting temperature (Tm) higher than normal conditions as gatekeepers would be an efficient strategy for smart temperature-responsive DDS. These polymers remain in a solid state at temperatures lower than their Tm but are converted to a liquid phase when the surrounding temperature is raised to Tm [75]. Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylamide) is a thermoresponsive polymer that is widely used in the design of these carriers. Russell et al. [76] used this polymer for capping the MSN pores with diameters of 2–5 nm through covalent binding. This study found that the density of the grafted polymers could directly influence the efficiency of the capping agent in loading and releasing the bioactive molecules. Linking thermosensitive polymers to the surface of magnetic core MSN, as discussed above, has been used for generation of externally thermoresponsive MSN. Another strategy for the design of thermoresponsive MSN is capping the pores with paraffins. Different types of paraffins such as heneicosane (C21) and tetracosane (C24) with different Tm have been used. Solid paraffins reaching the Tm convert to the liquid phase and allow the loaded cargo to be released [75].

On the other hand, bioactive molecules can be used as thermosensitive materials on the surface of MSN. These molecules respond to a change in the temperature, by losing their conventional structure, either by opening of α-helix configuration or by altering hydrogen-linked subunits. This mechanism is depicted in Figure 8. Zhang’s group [45] attached a single-stranded DNA at the MSN pore sites, and its complementary strand was attached to a copper sulfide (CuS) nanoparticles. CuS is a nontoxic semiconductor compound that shows the effective photothermal ablation behavior. By irradiation of the CuS NP with NIR light, the temperature was increased and the two strands of DNA became separated and CuS cap was removed leading to release of the cargo. Interestingly, after cessation of the irradiation and temperature decrease the cap returned to the pore site by annealing of the two complementary DNA strands thus providing reversible controlled release. Using a similar concept, Chang’s group [77] utilized Au nanorods as a gatekeeper and a pair of oligonucleotides to form a temperature-responsive element under NIR light irradiation.

Figure 8: Schematic of thermally responsive MSN: the normal structure of a thermally responsive material is changed under temperature fluctuation. Reused from Reference [45] with the permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 8:

Schematic of thermally responsive MSN: the normal structure of a thermally responsive material is changed under temperature fluctuation. Reused from Reference [45] with the permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Based on changing the configuration of an α-helix, Torre’s group [78] used a 17-mer peptide anchored to a polymer as a gatekeeper. The α-helical structure of this peptide was converted to a random coil conformation at a raised temperature due to disorder arising in its structure. This transformation led to a reduction in the molecular crowding at the pore surface and led to the release of the cargo, whereas by reducing the temperature, the self-assembly property of the peptide covered the pore entrance and blocked the cargo release.

3.7 Toxicity of MSN

Silica materials, in general, are considered as being noncytotoxic, but the silica nano-composite materials may possess different properties owing to alteration of the physicochemical characteristics at the nanoscale [79]. Previously, it was shown that MSNs have significantly lower cytotoxicity toward phagocytes and inflammatory cells in in vitro conditions compared to amorphous colloidal silica NPs [80]. Some literature has indicated that the properties of SiO2 nanoparticles can influence their interaction with targeted cells. The surface modification of silica nanoparticles enhances their cellular uptake [81], the pore diameter increases the adsorption capacity [82], and the different geometry of the particles can disturb normal cell functions [83]. The fact that the properties of silica nanoparticles could influence their biodistribution and biocompatibility cautions us to consider different parameters in the design of these nanoparticles in order to reduce their possible toxicity.

Yu’s group [84] focused on the impact of the charged surface groups, porosity, and geometry of the silica NPs on erythrocyte hemolysis and macrophage toxicity. They found that the toxicity of the SiO2 was dependent on cell type, which is due to different physiological functions of different cells. Moreover, they suggested that the major factor in the cellular interactions was the surface properties and porosity of the SNPs, and comparison of different structures on erythrocyte hemolysis indicated that amine modification of SiO2 reduced the toxicity of these NPs.

Fu et al. [85] studied the effect of the administration route on MSN toxicity. They found that after systemic administration, nanosilica particles accumulated in the liver and their distribution was not the same in the body after other administration routes. According to their results, as the MSN are excreted via urine and feces, the most compatible routes for administration of MSN were oral and intravenous injection. They also indicated that MSN excretion by the kidney could not cause any microstructural kidney damage.

Further studies suggested that in vitro assays might yield different results from assays after in vivo administration. In vivo interaction of SNPs with the reticuloendothelial system, (the major physiological system for blood purification) and interactions with complex serum protein concentrations could affect immune responses through the body. The presence of pores on the surface of SNPs could change the proliferation of splenocytes and increase immunoglobulin levels. MSN could possibly damage the immune system by disrupting the lymphocyte population patterns and produce alteration in lymph nodes [86].

4 Conclusion

Nanocarriers must play two main roles in DDS; first they must reduce the toxicity of the bioactive molecules and prevent their distribution throughout the body, especially highly toxic anticancer drugs, and second, the nanocarriers should be able to protect the drug from degradation and removal of the natural systems of the body and enable them to reach their targeted sites. Among all the presently available nanocarriers, MSN has an impressive capacity for carrying drugs, due to their high surface-to-volume ratio, and large pore volume. The presence of many free hydroxyl groups on the surface of the silica provides suitable attachment sites for modification in which either hydrophobic or hydrophilic compounds can easily attach to it. The diameter of the MSN pores is flexible and can be adjusted by the preparation methods used to make the nanocarriers. In order to fabricate smart stimulus-responsive nanocarriers, different types of gatekeepers can attach to the entrance of the pores. These structures affect the pore size, as well as tailoring the interaction properties of the MSN. Apart from magnetic responsiveness that relies on a magnetic core entrapped inside the MSN shell, all the other types of responsivity can be provided by tailoring the gatekeepers. Polymers and other structures that cover the pores prevent premature drug release, while on application of the internal or external trigger, the gatekeepers are removed, and the targeted drug release takes place. In some cases, the drug release process is reversible, and the stimulus can be repeatedly applied, so that metered drug release is theoretically possible. In other cases, dual stimulus responsivity can be achieved, and even responsivity to three different stimuli. We suggest that MSN will continue to be studied as efficient, versatile, and tunable nanovehicles for targeted drug delivery. In the future, more in vivo studies need to be carried out to test their true utility in living whole organisms.


Corresponding author: Michael R. Hamblin, Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; and Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

Acknowledgments

MRH was supported by US NIH grant R01AI050875. The authors gratefully extend their appreciation to Mahnaz Bozorgomid for illustrating the schematic figure.

References

[1] Fleige E, Quadir MA, Haag R. Stimuli-responsive polymeric nanocarriers for the controlled transport of active compounds: concepts and applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 866–884.10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Vallet-Regi M, Rámila A, Del Real RP, Pérez-Pariente J. A new property of MCM-41: drug delivery system. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 308–311.10.1021/cm0011559Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Yang P, Gai S, Lin J. Functionalized mesoporous silica materials for controlled drug delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3679.10.1039/c2cs15308dSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Shchipunov YA, Burtseva YV, Karpenko TY, Shevchenko NM, Zvyagintseva TN. Highly efficient immobilization of endo-1, 3-??-d-glucanases (laminarinases) from marine mollusks in novel hybrid polysaccharide-silica nanocomposites with regulated composition. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2006, 40, 16–23.10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.02.002Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Bao G, Mitragotri S, Tong S. Multifunctional nanoparticles for drug delivery and molecular imaging. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 15, 253–282.10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152409Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Argyo C, Weiss V, Bräuchle C, Bein T. Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a universal platform for drug delivery. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 435–451.10.1021/cm402592tSuche in Google Scholar

[7] He Q, Shi J. Mesoporous silica nanoparticle based nano drug delivery systems: synthesis, controlled drug release and delivery, pharmacokinetics and biocompatibility. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 5845.10.1039/c0jm03851bSuche in Google Scholar

[8] Li Z, Barnes JC, Bosoy A, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2590.10.1039/c1cs15246gSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Tang F, Li L, Chen D. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: synthesis, biocompatibility and drug delivery. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1504–1534.10.1002/adma.201104763Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Shchipunov YA, Kojima A, Imae T. Polysaccharides as a template for silicate generated by sol-gel processes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 285, 574–580.10.1016/j.jcis.2004.11.026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Yokoi T, Kubota Y, Tatsumi T. Amino-functionalized mesoporous silica as base catalyst and adsorbent. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2012, 421: 14–37.10.1016/j.apcata.2012.02.004Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Slowing II, Vivero-Escoto JL, Trewyn BG, Lin VS-Y. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: structural design and applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 7924.10.1039/c0jm00554aSuche in Google Scholar

[13] Brook M a., Chen Y, Guo K, Zhang Z, Jin W, Deisingh A, Cruz-Aguado J, Brennam JD. Proteins entrapped in silica monoliths prepared from glyceroxysilanes. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2004, 31, 343–348.10.1023/B:JSST.0000048014.09497.39Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Choy JH, Oh JM, Choi SJ. Bio-Inorganic conjugates for drug and gene delivery. In Bio-inorganic Hybrid Nanomaterials: Strategies, Syntheses, Characterization and Applications. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. John Wiley & Sons: Germany, 2008, pp. 401–18.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Shchipunov YA, Krekoten A V. Hybrid organic – inorganic nanocomposites fabricated with a novel biocompatible precursor using sol-gel processing. Compos. Interfaces 2005, 11, 587–607.10.1163/1568554053148816Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Halamová D, Zeleňák V. NSAID naproxen in mesoporous matrix MCM-41: drug uptake and release properties. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2012, 72, 15–23.10.1007/s10847-011-9990-xSuche in Google Scholar

[17] Halamová D, Badaničová M, Zeleňák V, Gondová T, Vainio U. Naproxen drug delivery using periodic mesoporous silica SBA-15. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 6489–6494.10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.04.044Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Chen Y, Chen H, Ma M, Chen F, Limin G, Zhang L, Shi J. Double mesoporous silica shelled spherical/ellipsoidal nanostructures: synthesis and hydrophilic/hydrophobic anticancer drug delivery. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 5290.10.1039/c0jm04024jSuche in Google Scholar

[19] Lang N, Tuel A. A fast and efficient ion-exchange procedure to remove surfactant molecules from MCM-41 materials. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 1961–1966.10.1021/cm030633nSuche in Google Scholar

[20] Karimi M, Solati N, Amiri M, Mirshekarid H, Mohamedb E, Taherib M, Hashemkhanib M, Saeidib A, Estiare MA, Kianib P, Ghasemic A, Basrif SMM, Arefe AR, Hamblin MR. Carbon nanotubes part I: preparation of a novel and versatile drug-delivery vehicle. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2015, 12, 1–17.10.1517/17425247.2015.1003806Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Mamaeva V, Sahlgren C, Lindén M. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in medicine – Recent advances. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 689–702.10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Rosenholm JM, Sahlgren C, Linden M. Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles for combined therapeutic, diagnostic and targeted action in cancer treatment. Curr. Drug Targets 2011, 12, 1166–1186.10.2174/138945011795906624Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Kratz F, Müller IA, Ryppa C, Warnecke A. Prodrug strategies in anticancer chemotherapy. ChemMedChem 2008, 3, 20–53.10.1002/cmdc.200700159Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Vivero-Escoto JL, Slowing II, Trewyn BG, Lin VS-Y. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular controlled drug delivery. Small 2010, 6, 1952–1967.10.1002/smll.200901789Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Slowing II, Vivero-Escoto JL, Wu C-W, Lin VS-Y. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as controlled release drug delivery and gene transfection carriers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1278–1288.10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Duncan R. The dawning era of polymer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003, 2, 347–360.10.1038/nrd1088Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Pal N, Bhaumik A. Soft templating strategies for the synthesis of mesoporous materials: inorganic, organic-inorganic hybrid and purely organic solids. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 189–190, 21–41.10.1016/j.cis.2012.12.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Wang Y, Gu H. Core-shell-type magnetic mesoporous silica nanocomposites for bioimaging and therapeutic agent delivery. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 576–585.10.1002/adma.201401124Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Dou B, Hu Q, Li J, Qiao S, Hao Z. Adsorption performance of VOCs in ordered mesoporous silicas with different pore structures and surface chemistry. J. Hazard Mater. 2011, 186, 1615–1624.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.051Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Manzano M, Vallet-Regí M. New developments in ordered mesoporous materials for drug delivery. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 5593.10.1039/b922651fSuche in Google Scholar

[31] Mofazzal Jahromi MA, Karimi M, Azadmanesh K, Naderi Manesh H, Hassan ZM, Moazzeni SM. The effect of chitosan-tripolyphosphate nanoparticles on maturation and function of dendritic cells. Comp. Clin. Path. 2013, 1–7. doi:10.1007/s00580-013-1799-0.10.1007/s00580-013-1799-0Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Rahman IA, Padavettan V. Synthesis of silica nanoparticles by sol-gel: size-dependent properties, surface modification, and applications in silica-polymer nanocompositesa review. J. Nanomater. 2012, 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/132424.10.1155/2012/132424Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Karimi M, Solati N, Ghasemi A, Estiard MA, Hashemkhanib M, Kianib P, Mohamedb E, Saeidib A, Taherib M, Avcief P, Arefgh AR, Amiric M, Baniasadic F, Hamblin MR. Carbon nanotubes part II: a remarkable carrier for drug and gene delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2015, 12, 1–17.10.1517/17425247.2015.1004309Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[34] Chan M-H, Lin H-M. Preparation and identification of multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo dual-mode imaging, theranostics, and targeted tracking. Biomaterials 2015, 46, 149–158.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.034Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Sun Y-L, Zhou Y, Li Q-L, Yang Y-W. Enzyme-responsive supramolecular nanovalves crafted by mesoporous silica nanoparticles and choline-sulfonatocalix[4]arene [2]pseudorotaxanes for controlled cargo release. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9033.10.1039/c3cc45216fSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Yang Q, Wang S, Fan P, Wang L, Di Y, Lin K, Xiao F-S. pH-responsive carrier system based on carboxylic acid modified mesoporous silica and polyelectrolyte for drug delivery. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 5999–6003.10.1021/cm051198vSuche in Google Scholar

[37] Lu J, Choi E, Tamanoi F, Zink JI. Light-activated nanoimpeller-controlled drug release in cancer cells. Small 2008, 4, 421–426.10.1002/smll.200700903Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[38] Sirsi SR, Borden MA. State-of-the-art materials for ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 72, 3–14.10.1016/j.addr.2013.12.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] Cohen Y, Shoushan SY. Magnetic nanoparticles-based diagnostics and theranostics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24, 672–681.10.1016/j.copbio.2013.01.006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] Zhang Z, Liu C, Bai J, Wu C, Xiao Y, Li Y, Zheng J, Yang R, Tan W. Silver nanoparticle gated, mesoporous silica coated gold nanorods (AuNR@MS@AgNPs): low premature release and multifunctional cancer theranostic platform. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015, 1–34. doi:10.1021/acsami.5b00368.10.1021/acsami.5b00368Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] Wang Y, Han N, Zhao Q, Bai L, Li J, Jiang T, Wang S. Redox-responsive mesoporous silica as carriers for controlled drug delivery: a comparative study based on silica and PEG gatekeepers. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 72, 12–20.10.1016/j.ejps.2015.02.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Cheng YJ, Luo GF, Zhu JY, Xu XD, Zeng X, Cheng DB, Li YM, Wu Y, Zhang XZ, Zhuo RX, He F. Enzyme-induced and tumor targeted drug delivery system based on multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces ACS applied materials & interfaces. 2015, 7, 9078–9087.10.1021/acsami.5b00752Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Gan Q, Lu X, Yuan Y, Quian J, Zhou H, Lu X, Shi J, Liu C. A magnetic, reversible pH-responsive nanogated ensemble based on Fe3O4 nanoparticles-capped mesoporous silica. Biomaterials. 2011, 32, 1932–1942.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.020Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Baeza A, Guisasola E, Ruiz-Hernández E, Vallet-Regí M. Magnetically triggered multidrug release by hybrid mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 517–524.10.1021/cm203000uSuche in Google Scholar

[45] Zhang L, Li Y, Jin Z, Yu JC, Chan KM. An NIR-triggered and thermally responsive drug delivery platform through DNA/copper sulfide gates. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 12614–12624.10.1039/C5NR02767ESuche in Google Scholar

[46] Saito G, Swanson JA, Lee KD. Drug delivery strategy utilizing conjugation via reversible disulfide linkages: role and site of cellular reducing activities. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2003, 55, 199–215.10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00179-5Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Wu G, Fang Y-Z, Yang S, Lupton JR, Turner ND. Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 489–492.10.1093/jn/134.3.489Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Meng F, Hennink WE, Zhong Z. Reduction-sensitive polymers and bioconjugates for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 2180–2198.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Deng R, Yue Y, Jin F, Chen Y, Kung H-F, Lin MCM, Wu C. Revisit the complexation of PEI and DNA – How to make low cytotoxic and highly efficient PEI gene transfection non-viral vectors with a controllable chain length and structure? J. Control Release 2009, 140, 40–46.10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.07.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Luo Z, Cai K, Hu Y, Li J, Ding X, Zhang B, Xu D, Yang W, Liu P. Redox-responsive molecular nanoreservoirs for controlled intracellular anticancer drug delivery based on magnetic nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 431–435.10.1002/adma.201103458Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Wang H, Liu Y, Li M, Huang H, Xu HM, Hong RJ, Shen H. Multifunctional TiO2 nanowires-modified nanoparticles bilayer film for 3D dye-sensitized solar cells. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. Rapid Commun. 2010, 4, 1166–1169.Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Li Z-Y, Hu J-J, Xu Q, Chen S, Jia H-Z, Sun Y-X, Zhuo R-X, Zhang X-Z. A redox-responsive drug delivery system based on RGD containing peptide-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 39–44.10.1039/C4TB01533ASuche in Google Scholar

[53] Sun L, Liu Y-J, Yang Z-Z, Qi X-R. Tumor specific delivery with redox-triggered mesoporous silica nanoparticles inducing neovascularization suppression and vascular normalization. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 55566–55578.10.1039/C5RA09633BSuche in Google Scholar

[54] van Rijt SH, Bölükbas DA, Argyo C, Datz S, Lindner M, Oliver Eickelberg O, Königshoffet M, Bein T, Meiners S. Protease-mediated release of chemotherapeutics from mesoporous silica nanoparticles to ex vivo human and mouse lung tumors. ACS Nano. 2015, (Xx).10.1021/nn5070343Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Xu J, Gao F, Li L, Ma HL, Fan Y-S, Liu W, Guo S-S, Zhao X-Z, Wang H. Gelatin–mesoporous silica nanoparticles as matrix metalloproteinases-degradable drug delivery systems in vivo. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 182, 165–172.10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.08.050Suche in Google Scholar

[56] Edwards JV, Prevost N, French A, Concha M, Delucca A, Wu Q. Nanocellulose-based biosensors: design, preparation, and activity of peptide-linked cotton cellulose nanocrystals having fluorimetric and colorimetric elastase detection sensitivity. Engineering 2013, 2013(September), 20–28.10.4236/eng.2013.59A003Suche in Google Scholar

[57] de la Rica R, Aili D, Stevens MM. Enzyme-responsive nanoparticles for drug release and diagnostics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 967–978.10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[58] Vatansever F, de Melo WCMA, Avci P, Vecchio D, Sadasivam M, Gupta A, Chandran R, Karimi M, Parizotto NA, Yin R, Tegos GP, Hamblin MR. Antimicrobial strategies centered around reactive oxygen species-bactericidal antibiotics, photodynamic therapy, and beyond. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 955–989.10.1111/1574-6976.12026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[59] Li J, Liu F, Shao Q, Min Y, Costa M, YeowEKL, Xing B. Enzyme-responsive cell-penetrating peptide conjugated mesoporous silica quantum dot nanocarriers for controlled release of nucleus-targeted drug molecules and real-time intracellular fluorescence imaging of tumor cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2014, 3, 1230–1239.10.1002/adhm.201300613Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[60] Mondragón L, Mas N, Ferragud V, de la Torre C, Agostini A, Martínez-Máñez R, Sancenón F, Amorós P, Pérez-Payá E, Orzáez M. Enzyme-responsive intracellular-controlled release using silica mesoporous nanoparticles capped with ε-poly-l-lysine. Chem. – A Eur. J. 2014, 1–12. doi:10.1002/chem.201400148.10.1002/chem.201400148Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] Zhu Y, Shi J. A mesoporous core-shell structure for pH-controlled storage and release of water-soluble drug. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2007, 103, 243–249.10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.02.012Suche in Google Scholar

[62] Sun Y, Sun YL, Wang L, Ma J, Yang YW, Gao H. Nanoassembles constructed from mesoporous silica nanoparticles and surface-coated multilayer polyelectrolytes for controlled drug delivery. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 185, 245–253.10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.11.020Suche in Google Scholar

[63] Yang Y-W. Towards biocompatible nanovalves based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles. MedChemComm 2011, 2, 1033.10.1039/c1md00158bSuche in Google Scholar

[64] Zhang L, Li Y, Yu JC. Chemical modification of inorganic nanostructures for targeted and controlled drug delivery in cancer treatment. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2014, 2, 452.10.1039/C3TB21196GSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[65] Li H, Tan L-L, Jia P, Li Q-L, Sun Y-L, Zhang J, Ning Y-Q, Yu J, Yang Y-W. Near-infrared light-responsive supramolecular nanovalve based on mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 2804.10.1039/c4sc00198bSuche in Google Scholar

[66] Chen L, Wang W, Su B, Wen Y, Li C, Zhou Y, Li M, Shi X, Du H, Song Y, Jiang L. A light-responsive release platform by controlling the wetting behavior of hydrophobic surface. ACS Nano. 2014, 8, 744–751.10.1021/nn405398dSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Liu J, Wang C, Wang X, Wang X, Cheng L, Li Y, Liu Z. Mesoporous silica coated single-walled carbon nanotubes as a multifunctional light-responsive platform for cancer combination therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 384–392.10.1002/adfm.201403079Suche in Google Scholar

[68] He D, Li X, He X, Wang K, Tang J, Yang X, He X, Yang X, Zou Z. Noncovalent assembly of reduced graphene oxide and alkyl-grafted mesoporous silica: an effective drug carrier for near-infrared light-responsive controlled drug release. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2015, 3, 5588–5594.10.1039/C5TB00581GSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] Tarn D, Ferris DP, Barnes JC, Amobrogio MW, Stoddar JF, Zink JI. A reversible light-operated nanovalve on mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2015, 1–10. doi:10.1039/c0xx00000x.10.1039/c0xx00000xSuche in Google Scholar

[70] Freeman MW, Arrott A, Watson JHL. Magnetism in medicine. J. Appl. Phys. 1960, 31, S404–5.10.1063/1.1984765Suche in Google Scholar

[71] Song N, Yang Y-W. Molecular and supramolecular switches on mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3474–3504.10.1039/C5CS00243ESuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[72] Dong L, Peng H, Wang S, Zhang Z, Li J, Ai F, Zhao Q, Luo M, Xiong H, Chen L. Thermally and magnetically dual-responsive mesoporous silica nanospheres: preparation, characterization, and properties for the controlled release of sophoridine. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 4–11.10.1002/app.40477Suche in Google Scholar

[73] Thomas CR, Ferris DP, Lee JH, Choi E, Cho MH, Kim ES, Stoddart JF, Shin J-S, Cheon J, Zink JI. Noninvasive remote-controlled release of drug molecules in vitro using magnetic actuation of mechanized nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2010, 132, 10623–10625.10.1021/ja1022267Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[74] Lee SF, Zhu XM, Wang YXJ, Xuan SH, You Q, Chan WH, Wong CH, Wang F, Yu JC, Cheng CHK, Leung KCF. Ultrasound, pH, and magnetically responsive crown-ether-coated core/shell nanoparticles as drug encapsulation and release systems. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1566–1574.10.1021/am4004705Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[75] Alberti S, Soler-Illia GJAA, Azzaroni O. Gated supramolecular chemistry in hybrid mesoporous silica nanoarchitectures: controlled delivery and molecular transport in response to chemical, physical and biological stimuli. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6050–6075.10.1039/C4CC10414ESuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[76] Russell MM, Raboin L, Guardado-Alvarez TM, Zink JI. Trapping and release of cargo molecules from a micro-stamped mesoporous thin film controlled by poly(NIPAAm-co-AAm). J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2013, 70, 278–285.10.1007/s10971-013-3199-ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[77] Chang YT, Liao PY, Sheu HS, Tseng YJ, Cheng FY, Yeh CS. Near-infrared light-responsive intracellular drug and sirna release using au nanoensembles with oligonucleotide-capped silica shell. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 3309–3314.10.1002/adma.201200785Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[78] de la Torre C, Agostini A, Mondragón L, Orzáez M, Sancenón F, Martínez-Máñez R, Marcos MD, Amorós P, Pérez-Payá E. Temperature-controlled release by changes in the secondary structure of peptides anchored onto mesoporous silica supports. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 3184–3186.10.1039/C3CC49421GSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[79] Cho M, Cho WS, Choi M, Kim SJ, Kim HO, Sheen YY, Jeong J. The impact of size on tissue distribution and elimination by single intravenous injection of silica nanoparticles. Toxicol. Lett. 2009, 189, 177–183.10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.04.017Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[80] Lee S, Yun HS, Kim SH. The comparative effects of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and colloidal silica on inflammation and apoptosis. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 9434–9443.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.042Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[81] Slowing I, Trewyn BG, Lin VS-Y. Effect of surface functionalization of MCM-41-type mesoporous silica nanoparticles on the endocytosis by human cancer cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14792–14793.10.1021/ja0645943Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[82] Nguyen TPB, Lee JW, Shim WG, Moon H. Synthesis of functionalized SBA-15 with ordered large pore size and its adsorption properties of BSA. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2008, 110, 560–569.10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.06.054Suche in Google Scholar

[83] Maurer-Jones MA, Lin Y-S, Haynes CL. Functional assessment of metal oxide nanoparticle toxicity in immune cells. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3363–3373.10.1021/nn9018834Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[84] Yu T, Malugin A, Ghandehari H. Impact of silica nanoparticle design on cellular toxicity and hemolytic activity. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 5717–5728.10.1021/nn2013904Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[85] Fu C, Liu T, Li L, Liu H, Chen D, Tang F. The absorption, distribution, excretion and toxicity of mesoporous silica nanoparticles in mice following different exposure routes. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 2565–2575.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.043Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[86] Lee S, Kim MS, Lee D, Kwon TK, Khang D, Yun HS, Kim SH. The comparative immunotoxicity of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and colloidal silica nanoparticles in mice. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 147–158.10.2147/IJN.S39534Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2015-10-7
Accepted: 2015-12-1
Published Online: 2016-1-21
Published in Print: 2016-4-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Heruntergeladen am 3.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2015-0057/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen