Startseite Naturwissenschaften Theoretical study with dipole moment calculation of new electronic states of the molecule BF
Artikel Open Access

Theoretical study with dipole moment calculation of new electronic states of the molecule BF

  • Sally Al Shawa , Nayla El-Kork EMAIL logo , Ghassan Younes und Mahmoud Korek
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. August 2015
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The potential energy curves for the 45 singlet, triplet, and quintet electronic states in the representation 2s+1Λ(+/-) of the BF molecule have been investigated using the complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) method with multireference configuration interaction (MRCI). The internuclear distance Re, the harmonic frequency ωe, the static dipole moment μ, the rotational constants Be, and the electronic transition energy with respect to the ground state Te have been calculated for the considered electronic states. The comparison between the values of the present work and those available in the literature for several electronic states shows a very good agreement. Twelve electronic states of BF molecule are reported here for the first time that are not yet observed experimentally.

1 Introduction

The scientific community became interested in boron monofluoride (BF) molecules at the beginning of the 20th century. Between 1957 and 1985, many electronic states have been investigated by using different experimental techniques [110]. Between 1988 and 2011, 22 singlet and triplet electronic states have been studied theoretically [1136]. Recently, Magoulas et al. [37] have added, to these states, the study of 11 new singlet and triplet electronic states with a complete and detailed description of the studies on this molecule since 1927.

Based on our previous theoretical calculations [3846], we investigate in the present work, the electronic structure of new higher singlet and triplet, along with new 14 quintet electronic, states of the BF molecule. By using an ab initio calculation, the potential energy curves (PECs) as well as the permanent dipole moment curves (DMCs) are investigated for 45 electronic states along with the equilibrium internuclear distance Re, the transition energy with respect to the minimum energy of the ground state Te, the harmonic frequencies ωe, and the rotational constant Be.

2 Method of calculations

We investigate the low-lying singlet, triplet, and quintet electronic states of the molecule BF using complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) procedure followed by a multireference configuration interaction (MRCI with the Davidson correction) treatment for the electron correlation. The entire CASSCF configuration space was used as the reference in the MRCI calculations, which were done via the computational chemistry program MOLPRO [47] taking advantage of the graphical user interface GABEDIT [48]. The boron species is treated as a system of five electrons by using the aug-cc-pCVTZ; c basis set for s, p, and d functions. The nine electrons of the fluorine atom are considered using the DGauss-a1-Xfit; c basis set for s, p, and d functions. The very good quality of the selected basis sets for the BF molecule is checked by comparing our CI calculations for the ground and several excited states of isolated boron and fluorine atoms to the experimental data in NIST atomic spectra database from literature where the relative difference for the two atoms ranges between 0.91%≤ΔEe/Ee≤3.90%. Among the 14 electrons explicitly considered for the BF molecule, eight inner electrons were frozen in subsequent calculations so that six valence electrons were explicitly treated corresponding to 16 active orbitals. All computations were performed according to the C2v symmetry. Three high-power computing tools were used for performing the calculations: two local machines – Ankabut HPC Cluster (Abu-Dhabi, UAE), Khalifa University HPC (Abu-Dhabi, UAE) shared facility, and the Amazon Elastic Cloud Computing (EC2, Ashburn, VA, USA) facility.

The Ankabut HPC cluster is a 2U four-node server system that includes four Intel® Server Board S2600JF. It consists of a master node (2×Intel Xeon X5675 six cores) that has a memory storage of 48 GB. There is a total number of 16 processes per node, with two cores per process, equating to a total number of 32 cores per node.

The Khalifa University HPC Cluster facility compromises 25 IBM x3755 M3 servers. Each node is configured with 4×AMD 12-core CPUS giving a total of 48 cores. Each server has 128 GB of RAM. Disk storage is proved with a pair of 250-GB STA disks mirrored in a RAID1 configuration. A single port 4X QDR Qlogic Infiniband adapter provides the high-speed interconnect between the cluster nodes. The storage and the management nodes are of the X3550 M3 Intel server-type. The Intel nodes contain two (for the management node) or one (for the storage) Intel CPUs.

The Amazon EC2 instance that we used is of the cc2.8xlarge type (Amazon Web Services, Ashburn, VA, USA). This instance sports two eight-core intel Xeon processors and 32 hardware execution threads. It has 60.5 GB of RAM and 3.37 TB of instance storage.

3 Results and discussion

The potential energy curves (PECs) for the 45 singlet, triplet, and quintet electronic states, in the representation 2s+1Λ(+/-), of the molecule BF were generated for 76 internuclear distance calculations in the range 0.85 Å≤R≤2.8Å (Figures 14). Some curves are dotted or dashed for clarity. We calculated the harmonic vibrational frequencies ωe, the relative energy separations with respect to the ground state Te, and the rotational constants Be of the different electronic states by fitting their potential energy curves into a polynomial in R, around the internuclear distance at equilibrium Re. These values with the available data in literature are given in Table 1. For the ground state, the relative differences between our calculated spectroscopic constants and those obtained experimentally in literature are 1.5% (Ref. [17])<ΔRe/Re<1.7% (Ref. [52]), 2.8% (Ref. [49])<Δωee<5.7 (Ref. [52]), and 1.5% (Ref. [52])<ΔBe/Be <8.7% (Ref. [49]). These relative differences show that the agreement for the Re values that we obtained, with those given in literature is very good, while those of ωe and Be vary between very good [49, 52] and acceptable [49, 52]. Similarly, our calculated ground state Re values are close with those obtained theoretically in literature, as the relative differences are in the order of 1.1% (Ref. [28])<ΔRe/Re<3.0% (Ref. [17]). Also, the agreements for ωe and Be vary between excellent [28, 49] and acceptable [17, 51], as the relative differences are, respectively, 0.1% (Ref. [28])<Δωee<6.4 (Ref. [51]) and 1.1% (Ref. [49])<ΔBe/Be<3.0% (Ref. [17]). One can notice that, the two values, ωe=1245 cm-1 [50] and Be=1.050633 cm-1 [51] are very small with respect to ours and to others obtained in the literature. This can be explained by the difference in the theoretical calculation technique used to obtain these constants. For the first excited state, the present work values of Re, ωe, and Be are in complete accordance with the experimental data [52], with the relative differences 0.1%, 0.9%, and 0.0%, respectively. Good accuracy is obtained by comparing the values that we computed, for the same constants, with those obtained theoretically in literature [37, 51], as in these cases, the relative differences are as follows: 1.1% [51]<ΔRe/Re<0.3% [37], 1.4% [51]<Δωee<2.9% [37] and 0.5% [51]<ΔBe/Be<1.3 [51].

Figure 1: Potential energy curves of the electronic states 1Σ± and 1Δ of the molecule BF.
Figure 1:

Potential energy curves of the electronic states 1Σ± and 1Δ of the molecule BF.

Figure 2: Potential energy curves of the electronic states 3Σ± and 3Δ of the molecule BF.
Figure 2:

Potential energy curves of the electronic states 3Σ± and 3Δ of the molecule BF.

Figure 3: Potential energy curves of the electronic states 1,3,5Π of the molecule BF.
Figure 3:

Potential energy curves of the electronic states 1,3,5Π of the molecule BF.

Figure 4: Potential energy curves of the electronic states 5Σ± and 5Δ of the molecule BF.
Figure 4:

Potential energy curves of the electronic states 5Σ± and 5Δ of the molecule BF.

Table 1

Spectroscopic constants of the molecule BF.

StatesTe (cm-1)Re (Å)ωe (cm-1)Be (cm-1)
X1Σ+0.0a1.2841486.81.485
1.245b1496b1.559b
1.265c1402c1.510c
1.26271d1445.666d1.6123d
1.2486≤Re≤1.3037e1245≤ωe≤1493e1.423≤Be≤1.551e
1.2502≤Re≤1.2697f1402.1≤ωe≤1488.8f
1.2625≤Re≤1.2673g1391.43≤ωe≤1405.15g1.050633≤Be≤1.51593g
1.2635h1408.57h
1.2625i1402.1i1.5072i
(1)3Π30,988.4a1.3091312.21.4091
34,427≤Te≤39,597g1.3076≤Re≤1.3151g1293.40≤ωe≤1334.80g1.39069≤Be≤1.41641g
29,355.63h1.3049h1350.68h
1.3081i1323.86i1.4135i
(1)1Π54,597.2a
51,009.6h1.3076h1240.41h
(1)3Σ+60,949.9a1.2311753.21.615
60,140.7h1.218h1659.8h
(2)1Σ+65,725.6a1.2281.623
64,438.6h1.2099h1697.76h
(2)3Σ+67,197.9a1.2391738.61.595
66,082.1h1.225h1591.9h
(3)1Σ+69,816.9a1.2421686.61.585
68,066.2h1.223h1617.4h
(2)3Π71,066.4a
69,429.7h1.2136h1696.87h
(2)1Π74,428.6a
70,685.2h1.2255h1682.84h
1.2188i1661.96i
(4)1Σ+87,288.6a1.2511222.41.535
88,453.7h1.567h1863.9h
(2)1Δ88,535.8a1.3871756.01.272
91,722.2h1.447h1363.9h
(5)1Σ+95,044.5a
(3)1Δ98,540.7a1.3362123.61.370
Σ+, Δ99,463.5a
(2)5Σ+126,967.8a1.703662.60.8447
(2)5Δ128,195.7a1.735620.00.8127
(2)5Σ-129,126.7a1.765574.40.7854
(3)5Σ+135,120.6a1.715578.20.8321
(3)5Δ136,390.2a1.7610517.90.7891
(3)5Σ-137,344.3a1.8030475.00.7527

aPresent work, bReftheo. [17], cRefexp. [1], dRefexp. [49], eReftheo. [50], fReftheo. [28], gReftheo. [51], hReftheo. [37], iRefexp. [52].

By comparing our calculated values for Te with those obtained theoretically in literature [37] for the excited electronic states, one can find a relative difference that varies between ΔTe/Te=1.22% for (3)1Σ+ and ΔTe/Te=6.6% for (1)1Π. The comparison with those of De-Heng et al. [51] for the electronic state (1)3Π gives a larger relative difference where 10%<ΔTe/Te<21.7%.

From the overall agreement between our data and that in literature, either theoretical or experimental, we confirm the validity of our technique of calculation. Consequently, we expect the same precision for the new results that we obtained, i.e. for the 12 previously uninvestigated electronic states. We are looking forward to future experimental studies on the high electronic states of the BF molecule to confirm the precision of our data.

We were able to determine the spectroscopic constants of nine excited states, out of the original new 12; actually, the three remaining states, and some of the previously seen in literature, are either unbound states or states that show an avoided crossing. In such cases, no spectroscopic constants can be determined. The avoided crossing between the adiabatic potential energy curves takes place usually at the position of, or near, the internuclear distance at the equilibrium distance Re. The existence of this phenomenon is related to the interaction between the adiabatic potential curves of the corresponding states. When two wavefunctions of two electronic states belonging to the same symmetry mix with each other to give two adiabatic solutions, the corresponding potential energy curves no longer cross, and the crossing becomes avoided between them. It then becomes impossible to calculate the corresponding spectroscopic constant of such states.

On the other hand, the crossing between two potential energy curves of two electronic states of different symmetry is usually allowed, and the electronic state wavefunctions are adiabatic solutions of the Schrödinger equation. An avoided crossing between two states causes an important change in their dipole moment, where the electronic character of the atom is interchanged in this region, and its polarity reversed. Such crossings or avoided crossings can dramatically alter the stability of the molecule. The dipole moments of the 45 lowest electronic states of the BF molecule are analyzed. The dipole moment operator is among the most reliably demanded as it helps predict important physical properties of molecules. The expectation value of this operator is sensitive to the nature of the least energetic and most chemically relevant valence electrons. The Hartree-Fock dipole moment (HF) is usually large, as the HF wavefunction overestimates the ionic contribution. All our calculations were also performed with the MOLPRO [38] program. The permanent dipole moments have been calculated by taking the boron atom at the origin, and the fluorine atom moves along the positive z-axis. These dipole moment curves are given in Figures 58. At large internuclear separations, all dipole moment curves asymptotically reach a zero value reflecting the proper dissociation of the molecule into neutral species.

Figure 5: Dipole moment curves of the electronic states 1Σ± and 1Δ of the molecule BF.
Figure 5:

Dipole moment curves of the electronic states 1Σ± and 1Δ of the molecule BF.

Figure 6: Dipole moment curves of the electronic states 1Σ- and 1Δ of the molecule BF.
Figure 6:

Dipole moment curves of the electronic states 1Σ- and 1Δ of the molecule BF.

Figure 7: Dipole moment curves of the electronic states 3Σ± and 3Δ of the molecule BF.
Figure 7:

Dipole moment curves of the electronic states 3Σ± and 3Δ of the molecule BF.

Figure 8: Dipole moment curves of the electronic states 5Σ± and 5Δ of the molecule BF.
Figure 8:

Dipole moment curves of the electronic states 5Σ± and 5Δ of the molecule BF.

4 Conclusion

In the present work, an ab initio calculation of 45 singlet, triplet, and quintet lowest electronic states in the 2s+1Λ± representation has been performed via CASSCF/MRCI methods. The potential energy curves have been calculated along with the spectroscopic constants Te, Re, Be, and ωe for these states and the static dipole moment μ. The comparison of our calculated values with either the theoretical or the experimental data available in the literature demonstrated an overall good agreement. The electronic structure of new higher singlet and triplet along with new 14 quintet electronic states of the BF molecule have been studied in the present work for the first time. The investigated data in the present work may help for more experimental or theoretical studies in the future for higher electronic states.


Corresponding author: Nayla El-Kork, Khalifa University, P.O. Box 573, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the use of Ankabut High Power Computer Facility, Khalifa University Shared High Power Computer, and Amazon Ec 2 cloud clusters. The authors would like to thank the Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research for the financial support of the present work by the grant program for scientific research 2013–2015.

References

[1] Onaka R. Study of the A1Π→X1Σ+ bands of B11F with a vacuum echelle spectrograph. J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 27, 374.10.1063/1.1743731Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Czarny J, Felenbok P. Rotational analysis of the band at 14,900 cm-1 of A3Σ–3Σ system of the BF molecule. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1968, 2, 533–535.10.1016/0009-2614(63)80006-8Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Lefebvre-Brion H, Moser CM. Calculation of Rydberg levels in NO and BF. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1965, 15, 211–219.10.1016/0022-2852(65)90037-8Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Krishnamachari SLNG, Singh M. Curr. Sci. (India) 1965, 34, 655.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Caton RB, Douglas AE. Electronic spectrum of the BF molecule. Can. J. Phys. 1970, 48, 432–452.10.1139/p70-058Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Murad E, Hildenbrand DL, Main RP. Dissociation energies of group IIIA monofluorides – the possibility of potential maxima in their excited Π states. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 45, 263.10.1063/1.1727320Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Witt WP, Barrow RF. The heat of sublimation of aluminium trifluoride and the heat of formation of aluminium monofluoride. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1959, 55, 730–735.10.1039/tf9595500730Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Lovas FJ, Johnson DR. Microwave spectrum of BF. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 55, 41.10.1063/1.1675537Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Le Floch AC, Lebreton J, Launay F, Ferran J, Rostas J. Reanalysis of the A to K emission system of 11BF. J. Phys. B 1980, 13, 3989.10.1088/0022-3700/13/20/012Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Nakanaga T, Takeo H, Kondo S, Matsumura C. Infrared diode laser spectrum of 11BF by the pulse discharge modulation method. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985, 114, 88–91.10.1016/0009-2614(85)85061-2Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Bredohl H, Dubois I, Mélen F. Singlet and triplet states of BF. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1988, 129, 145–150.10.1016/0022-2852(88)90265-2Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Cazzoli G, Cludi L, Degli Esposti C, Dove L. The millimeter and submillimeter-wave spectrum of boron monofluoride: equilibrium structure. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1989, 134, 159–167.10.1016/0022-2852(89)90138-0Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Zhang K-Q, Guo B, Braun V, Dulick M, Bernath PF. Infrared emission spectroscopy of BF and AlF. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1995, 170, 82–93.10.1006/jmsp.1995.1058Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Ransil BJ. Studies in molecular structure. I. Scope and summary of the diatomic molecule program. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1960, 32, 239.10.1103/RevModPhys.32.239Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Fraga S, Ransil BJ. Studies in molecular structure. VII. Limited configuration interaction for selected first-row diatomics. J. Chem. Phys. 1962, 36, 1127.10.1063/1.1732704Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Nesbet RK. Electronic structure of N2, CO, and BF. J. Chem. Phys. 1964, 40, 3619.10.1063/1.1725063Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Huo WM. Electronic structure of CO and BF. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, 624.10.1063/1.1696786Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Yoshimine M, McLean AD. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1967, IS, 313.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Sadlej AJ. Molecular electric polarizabilities. Theor. Chim. Acta (Berlin) 1978, 47, 205–216.10.1007/BF00577162Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Laaksonen L, Sundholm D, Pykkö P. Two-dimensional, fully numerical molecular calculations. IV. Hartree–Fock–Slater results on second-row diatomic molecules. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1985, 27, 601–612.10.1002/qua.560270509Suche in Google Scholar

[21] da Costa HFM, Simas AM, Smith NH Jr., Trsic M. The generator coordinate Hartree–Fock method for molecular systems. Near Hartree–Fock limit calculations for N2, CO and BF. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 192, 195–198.10.1016/0009-2614(92)85451-FSuche in Google Scholar

[22] Huzinaga S, Miyoshi E, Sekiya M. Electric dipole polarity of diatomic molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1440–1445.10.1002/jcc.540141205Suche in Google Scholar

[23] McDowell SAC, Buckingham AD. On the correlation between bond-length change and vibrational frequency shift in hydrogen-bonded complexes: a computational study of Y···HCl dimers (Y=N2, CO, BF). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15515–15520.10.1021/ja0543651Suche in Google Scholar

[24] McDowell SAC, Buckingham AD. Cooperative and diminutive hydrogen bonding in Y–HCN–HCN and NCH–Y–HCN trimers(Y=BF,CO,N2). J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 064303.10.1063/1.3297894Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Kurtz HA, Jordan KD. Properties of the X 1Σ state of BF. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1981, 81, 104–109.10.1016/0009-2614(81)85336-5Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Rosmus P, Werner H-J, Grimm M. Ab initio calculations of infrared transition rates in the ground states of BF and BF+. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1982, 92, 250–256.10.1016/0009-2614(82)80270-4Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Botschwina P. Spectroscopic properties of BH, BF, and HBF+ calculated by SCEP-CEPA. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1986, 118, 76–87.10.1016/0022-2852(86)90225-0Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Peterson KA, Woods RC. An ab initio investigation of the spectroscopic properties of BCl, CS, CCl+, BF, CO, CF+, N2, CN, and NO+. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 4409.10.1063/1.452852Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Honigmann M, Hirsch G, Buenker RJ. Theoretical study of the optical and generalized oscillator strengths for transitions between low-lying electronic states of the BF molecule. Chem. Phys. 1993, 172, 59–71.10.1016/0301-0104(93)80106-JSuche in Google Scholar

[30] Mérawa M, Bégué D, Rérat M, Pouchan C. Dynamic polarizability and hyperpolarizability for the 14 electron molecules CO and BF. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 280, 203–211.10.1016/S0009-2614(97)01113-5Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Martin JML, Taylor PR. Solvent effect on rotational motion of perchlorate ion. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 2995–3002.10.1021/jp9807930Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Bauschlicher CW Jr., Ricca A. Accurate heats of formation for BFn, BFn+, BCln, and BCln+ for n=1–3. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 4313–4318.10.1021/jp9903662Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Feller D, Sordo JA. Performance of CCSDT for diatomic dissociation energies. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 485.10.1063/1.481827Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Irikura KK, Johnson RD III, Hudgens JW. Electronic structure of BCl determined by ab initio calculations and resonance-enhanced multiphoton ionization spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 3800–3805.10.1021/jp994011uSuche in Google Scholar

[35] McDowell SAC, Buckingham AD. Cooperative and diminutive hydrogen bonding in Y–HCN–HCN and NCH–Y–HCN trimers(Y=BF,CO,N2). J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 064303.10.1063/1.3297894Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Chakrabarti K, Schneider IF, Tennyson J. Electron collisions with BF+: bound and continuum states of BF. J. Phys. B 2011, 44, 055203.10.1088/0953-4075/44/5/055203Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Magoulas I, Kalemos A, Mavridis A. An ab initio study of the electronic structure of BF and BF+. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 104312.10.1063/1.4793738Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Taher-Mansour F, Allouche AR, Korek M. Theoretical electronic structure of the lowest-lying states of ScCl molecule below 22, 500 cm-1. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 2008, 248, 61–65.10.1016/j.jms.2007.11.012Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Korek M, Kontar S, Taher-Mansour F, Allouche AR. Theoretical electronic structure of the molecule ScI. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 2009, 109, 236–242.10.1002/qua.21779Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Hamdan A, Korek M. Theoretical calculation of the low-lying sextet electronic states of CrF molecule. Chem. Phys. 2010, 369, 13–18.10.1016/j.chemphys.2010.01.023Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Hamdan A, Korek M. Theoretical study with vibration–rotation and dipole moment calculations of quartet states of the CrCl molecule. Int. Quant. Chem. 2011, 111, 2960.10.1002/qua.22602Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Fahs H, Korek M, Allouche AR, Aubert-Frecon M. Theoretical electronic structure of the lowest-lying states of the LaCl molecule. Chem. Phys. 2004, 299, 97–103.10.1016/j.chemphys.2003.12.009Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Badreddine K, El-Kork N, Korek M. Electronic structure with rovibrationl and dipole moment study of the NiO molecule. J. Mod. Phys. 2012, 3, 839.10.4236/jmp.2012.38110Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Fahs H, Korek M, Allouche AR, Aubert-Frecon M. Theoretical electronic structure of the lowest-lying states of the LaF molecule. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 3715.10.1063/1.1493769Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Farhat A, Korek M, Marques MAL, Abdul-Al SN. Ab initio calculation of the low-lying electronic states of the ZrN molecule. Can. J. Chem. 2012, 90, 631–639.10.1139/v2012-036Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Korek M, El-Kork N, Moussa AN, Bentiba A. Theoretical study with rovibrational and dipole moment calculation of the LaO molecule. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 575, 115–121.10.1016/j.cplett.2013.05.006Suche in Google Scholar

[47] MOLPRO is a package of ab initio programs written by Werner HJ, Knowles PJ, Knizia G, Manby FR, Schütz M, Celani P, Korona T, Lindh R, Mitrushenkov A, Rauhut G, Shamasundar KR, Adler TB, Amos RD, Bernhardsson A, Berning A, Cooper DL, Deegan MJO, Dobbyn AJ, Eckert F, Goll E, Hampel C, Hesselmann A, Hetzer G, Hrenar T, Jansen G, Köppl C, Liu Y, Lloyd AW, Mata RA, May AJ, McNicholas SJ, Meyer W, Mura ME, Nicklaß A, O’Neill DP, Palmieri P, Peng D, Pflüger K, Pitzer R, Reiher M, Shiozaki T, Stoll H, Stone AJ, Tarroni R, Thorsteinsson T, Wang M. Available at: http://www.molpro.net/info/users.Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Allouche AR. Gabedit – A graphical user interface for computational chemistry softwares. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 174–182.10.1002/jcc.21600Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Zhang K-Q, Guo B, Braun V, Dulick M, Bernath PF. Infrared emission spectroscopy of BF and AlF. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1995, 170, 82–93.10.1006/jmsp.1995.1058Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Omar Sinnokrot M, Sherrill CD. Density functional theory predictions of anharmonicity and spectroscopic constants for diatomic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 2439.10.1063/1.1386412Suche in Google Scholar

[51] De-Heng S, Xiang-Hong N, Jin-Feng S, Zun-Lue Z. Acta Phys. Sin. 2012, 61, 093105.10.7498/aps.61.093105Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Huber KP, Herzberg G. Constants of diatomic molecules. In NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, Linstrom, PJ, Mallard, WG, Eds., National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, 2012. See http://webbook.nist.gov (data prepared by J. W. Gallagher and R. D. Johnson III).Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-2-1
Accepted: 2015-5-6
Published Online: 2015-8-6
Published in Print: 2016-6-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Heruntergeladen am 17.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2015-0006/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen