Startseite A reliable analytical technique for fractional Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon equation with Mittag-Leffler kernel
Artikel Open Access

A reliable analytical technique for fractional Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon equation with Mittag-Leffler kernel

  • P. Veeresha und D. G. Prakasha EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. August 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The pivotal aim of the present work is to find the solution for fractional Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon (CDG) equation using q-homotopy analysis transform method (q-HATM). The considered technique is graceful amalgamations of Laplace transform technique with q-homotopy analysis scheme, and fractional derivative defined with Atangana-Baleanu (AB) operator. The fixed point hypothesis considered in order to demonstrate the existence and uniqueness of the obtained solution for the projected fractional-order model. In order to illustrate and validate the efficiency of the future technique, we analysed the projected model in terms of fractional order. Moreover, the physical behaviour of q-HATM solutions have been captured in terms of plots for diverse fractional order and the numerical simulation is also demonstrated. The obtained results elucidate that, the considered algorithm is easy to implement, highly methodical as well as accurate and very effective to examine the nature of nonlinear differential equations of arbitrary order arisen in the connected areas of science and engineering.

1 Introduction

Fractional calculus (FC) was originated in Newton’s time, but lately, it fascinated the attention of many scholars. From the last thirty years, the most intriguing leaps in scientific and engineering applications have been found within the framework of FC. The concept of the fractional derivative has been industrialized due to the complexities associated with a heterogeneities phenomenon. The fractional differential operators are capable to capture the behaviour of multifaceted media having diffusion process. It has been a very essential tool and many problems can be illustrated more conveniently and more accurately with differential equations having arbitrary order. Due to the swift development of mathematical techniques with computer software’s, many researchers started to work on generalised calculus to present their viewpoints while analysing many complex phenomena.

Numerous pioneering directions are prescribed for the diverse definitions of fractional calculus by many senior researchers, and which prearranged the foundation 1,2,3,4,5,6. Calculus with fractional order is associated to practical ventures and it extensively employed to nanotechnology 7, human diseases 8,9, chaos theory 10, and other areas 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34. The numerical and analytical solution for these equations illustrating these models have an impartment role in portraying nature of nonlinear problems ascends in connected areas of science.

In order to demonstrate the efficiency of the future scheme, we consider fifth-order nonlinear CGD equation of the form 35,36

ut+uxxxxx+30uuxxx+30uxuxx+180u2ux=0.(1)

The above equation is a class of KdV equation and further, it possesses distinct and diverse properties. The CGD equation is also familiar as Sawada-Kotera equation 37. Due to the importance of the considered problem, it has been magnetized the attention of many researchers from diverse areas. In 1984, Weiss illustrated the Painleve’ property for the Eq. (1)38. It has been proved that it has a strong physical background in fluid 39 and also has N-soliton solutions 40.

In the present scenario, many important and nonlinear models are methodically and effectively analysed with the help of fractional calculus. There have been diverse definitions are suggested by many senior research scholars, for instance, Riemann, Liouville, Caputo and Fabrizio. However, these definitions have their own limitations. The Riemann--Liouville derivative is unable to explain the importance of the initial conditions; the Caputo derivative has overcome this shortcoming but is impotent to explain the singular kernel of the phenomena. Later, in 2015 Caputo and Fabrizio defeated the above obliges 41, and many researchers are considered this derivative in order to analyse and find the solution for diverse classes of nonlinear complex problems. But some issues were pointed out in CF derivative, like non-singular kernel and non-local, these properties are very essential in describing the physical behaviour and nature of the nonlinear problems. In 2016, Atangana and Baleanu introduced and natured the novel fractional derivative, namely AB derivative. This novel derivative defined with the aid of Mittag--Leffler functions 42. This fractional derivative buried all the above-cited issues and helps us to understand the natural phenomena systematically and effectively.

In the present framework, we consider the fractional Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon (FCDG) equation of the form

aABCDtαux,t+uxxxxx+30uuxxx+30uxuxx+180u2ux=0,0<α0=1,(2)

where α is fractional-order and defined with AB fractional operator. The fractional-order is introduced in order to incorporate the memory effects and hereditary consequence in the phenomenon and these properties aid us to capture essential physical properties of the nonlinear problems.

Recently, many mathematicians and physicists developed very effective and more accurate methods in order to find and analyse the solution for complex and nonlinear problems arisen in science and engineering. In connection with this, the homotopy analysis method (HAM) proposed by Chinese mathematician Liao Shijun 43. HAM has been profitably and effectively applied to study the behaviour of nonlinear problems without perturbation or linearization. But, for computational work, HAM requires huge time and computer memory. To overcome this, there is an essence of the amalgamation of a considered method with well-known transform techniques.

In the present investigation, we put an effort to find and analysed the behaviour of the solution obtained for the FCDG equation by applying q-HATM. The future algorithm is the combination of q-HAM with LT 44. Since q-HATM is an improved scheme of HAM; it does not require discretization, perturbation or linearization. Recently, due to its reliability and efficacy, the considered method is exceptionally applied by many researchers to understand physical behaviour diverse classes of complex problems 45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53. The projected method offers us more freedom to consider the diverse class of initial guess and the equation type complex as well as nonlinear problems; because of this, the complex NDEs can be directly solved. The novelty of the future method is it aids a modest algorithm to evaluate the solution and it natured by the homotopy and axillary parameters, which provides the rapid convergence in the obtained solution for a nonlinear portion of the given problem. Meanwhile, it has prodigious generality because it plausibly contains the results obtained by many algorithms like q-HAM, HPM, ADM and some other traditional techniques. The considered method can preserve great accuracy while decreasing the computational time and work in comparison with other methods. The considered nonlinear problem recently fascinated the attention of researchers from different areas of science. Since FCDG equation plays a significant role in portraying several nonlinear phenomena and also which are the generalizations of diverse complex phenomena, many authors find and analysed the solution using analytical as well as numerical schemes 54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61.

2 Preliminaries

Recently, many authors considered these derivatives to analyse a diverse class of models in comparison with classical order as well as other fractional derivatives, and they prove that AB derivative is more effective while analysing the nature and physical behaviour of the models 62,63,64,65. Here, we define the basic notion of Atangana-Baleanu derivatives and integrals 42.

Definition 1

The fractional Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo derivative for a function fH1 (a, b) (b > a, α ∈ [0, 1])is presented as follows

aABCDtαft=Bα1αatfϑEααtϑαα1dϑ.(3)

where B[α] is a normalization function such that B(0) = B(1) = 1.

Definition 2

The AB derivative of fractional order for a function fH1 (a, b) b > a, α ∈ [0, 1] in Riemann-Liouville sense presented as follows

aABRDtαft=Bα1αddtatfϑEααtϑαα1dϑ.(4)

Definition 3

The fractional AB integral related to the non-local kernel is defined by

aABItαft=1αBαft+αBαΓαatfϑtϑα1dϑ(5)

Definition 4

The Laplace transform (LT) of AB derivative is defined by

L0ABRDtαft=Bα1αsαLftsα1f0sα+α/(1α)(6)

Theorem 1

The following Lipschitz conditions respectively hold true for both Riemann-Liouville and AB derivatives defined in Eqs. (3) and (4)42,

aABCDtαf1taABCDtαf2t<K1f1xf2x,(7)

and

aABCDtαf1taABCDtαf2t<K2f1xf2x.(8)

Theorem 2

The time-fractional differential equation aABCDtαf1t=st has a unique solution and which is defined as 42

ft=1αBαst+αBαΓα0tsςtςα1dς.(9)

3 Fundamental idea of the considered scheme

In this segment, we consider the arbitrary order differential equation in order to demonstrate the fundamental solution procedure of the projected algorithm

aABCDtαvx,t+Rvx,t+Nvx,t=fx,t,n1<αn(10)

with the initial condition

vx,0=gx,(11)

where aABCDtαvx,t symbolise the AB derivative of v(x, t), f(x, t) signifies the source term, R and N respectively denotes the linear and nonlinear differential operator. On using the LT on Eq. (10), we have after simplification

Lvx,tgxs+1Bα(1α+αsα)LRvx,t+LNvx,tLfx,t=0.(12)

The non-linear operator is defined as follows

Nφx,t;q=Lφx,t;qgxs+1Bα(1α+αsα)LRφx,t;q+LNφx,t;qLfx,t.(13)

Here, φ(x, t; q) is the real-valued function with respect to x, t and (q[0,1n]). Now, we define a homotopy as follows

1nqLφx,t;qv0x,t=qNφx,t;q,(14)

where L is signifying LT,q[0,1n](n1) is an auxiliary parameter. For q = 0 and q=1n, the results are given below hold true

φx,t;0=v0x,t,φx,t;1n=vx,t.(15)

Thus, by intensifying q from 0 to 1n, the solution φ(x, t; q) varies from v0(x, t) to v(x, t). By using the Taylor theorem near to q, we defining φ(x, t; q) in series form and then we get

φx,t;q=v0x,t+m=1vmx,tqm,(16)

where

vmx,t=1m!mφ(x,t;q)qm|q=0.(17)

The series (14) converges at q=1n for the proper chaise of v0(x, t), n and . Then

vx,t=v0x,t+m=1vmx,t1nm.(18)

Now, m-times differentiating Eq. (15) with q and later dividing by m! and then putting q = 0, we obtain

L[vmx,tkmvm1x,t]=Rmvm1,(19)

where the vectors are defined as

vm=v0x,t,v1x,t,,vmx,t.(20)

On applying inverse LT on Eq. (19), one can get

vmx,t=kmvm1x,t+L1Rmvm1,(21)

where

Rmvm1=Lvm1x,t1kmn(gxs+1Bα(1α+αsα)Lfx,t)+1Bα(1α+αsα)LRvm1+Hm1,(22)

and

km=0,m1,n,m>1.(23)

In Eq. (22), Hm signifies homotopy polynomial and presented as follows

Hm=1m!mφx,t;qqmq=0(24)

and φ(x, t; q) = φ0 + 1 + q2φ2 + ….

By the aid of Eqs. (21) and (22), one can get

vmx,t=km+vm1x,t1kmnL1(gxs+1Bα(1α+αsα)Lfx,t)+L1{1Bα(1α+αsα)LRvm1+Hm1}.(25)

Using the Eq. (25), one can get the series of vm (x, t). Lastly, the series q-HATM solution is defined as

vx,t=v0x,t+m=1vmx,t1nm.(26)

4 Solution for FCDG equation

In order to present the solution procedure and efficiency of the future scheme, in this segment, we consider FCDG equation of fractional order. Further by the help of obtained results, we made an attempt to capture the behaviour of q-HATM solution for different fractional order. By the help of Eq. (2), we have

aABCDtαux,t+uxxxxx+30uuxxx+30uxuxx+180u2ux=0,0<α1,(27)

with initial condition

ux,0=μ2sech2μx.(28)

Taking LT on Eq. (27) and then using the Eq. (28), we get

Lux,t=1sμ2sech2μx+1Bα(1α+αsα)L{5ux5+30u3ux3+30ux2ux2+180u2ux}.(29)

The non-linear operator N is presented with the help of future algorithm as below

Nφx,t;q=Lφx,t;q1sμ2sech2μx+1Bα(1α+αsα)L{5φx5+30φ3φx3+30φx2φx2+180φ2φx}.(30)

The deformation equation of m-th order by the help of q-HATM at H(x, t) = 1, is given as follows

Lumx,tkmum1x,t=R1,mum1,vm1,(31)

where

Rmum1=Lum1x,t1kmn1sμ2sech2μx+1Bα(1α+αsα)L{5um1x5+30i=0m1ui3um1ix3+30i=0m1uix2um1ix2+jii=0m1ujuijum1ix}.(32)

On applying inverse LT on Eq. (31), it reduces to

umx,t=kmum1x,t+L1Rmum1.(33)

On simplifying the above equation systematically by using u0x,t=1sμ2sech2μx we can evaluate the terms of the series solution

ux,t=u0x,t+m=1umx,t1nm.(34)

5 Existence of solutions for the future model

Here, we considered the fixed-point theorem in order to demonstrate the existence of the solution for the considered model. Since the considered model cited in the system (27) is non-local as well as complex; there are no particular algorithms or methods exist to evaluate the exact solutions. However, under some particular conditions the existence of the solution assurances. Now, the system (27) is considered as follows:

0ABCDtαux,t=Gx,t,u.(35)

The foregoing system is transformed to the Volterra integral equation using the Theorem 2, and which as follows

ux,tux,0=1αBαGx,t,u+αBαΓα0tGx,ζ,utζα1dζ.(36)

Theorem 3

The kernel G satisfies the Lipschitz condition and contraction if the condition 0 ≤ (δ5 + 30δ(2(a2 + b2 + ab) + δ)) < 1 holds.

Proof

In order to prove the required result, we consider the two functions u and u1, then

Gx,t,uGx,t,u1=(5x5ux,tux,t1+30(ux,t3ux,tx3ux,t13ux,t1x3)+30(ux,tx2ux,tx2ux,t1x2ux,t1x2)+180(u2x,tux,txu2x,t1ux,t1x)δ5+30δ2a2+b2+ab+δux,tu(x,t1)δ5+30δ2a2+b2+ab+δux,tu(x,t1),(37)

where δ is the differential operator. Since u and u1 are bounded, we have ∥u(x, t)∥ ≤ a and ∥u(x, t1)∥ ≤ b. Putting η = δ5 + 30δ(2(a2 + b2 + ab) + δ) in the above inequality, then we have

Gx,t,uGx,t,u1ηux,tux,t1.(38)

This gives, the Lipschitz condition is obtained for G1. Further, we can see that if 0 ≤ (δ5 + 30δ(2(a2 + b2 + ab) + δ)) < 1, then it implies the contraction. The recursive form of Eq. (36) defined as follows

unx,t=1αBαGx,t,un1+αBαΓα0tGx,ζ,un1tζα1dζ.(39)

The associated initial condition is

ux,0=u0x,t.(40)

The successive difference between the terms is presented as follows

ϕnx,t=unx,tun1x,t=1αBαGx,t,un1Gx,t,un2+αBαΓα0tGx,ζ,un1tζα1dζ.(41)

Notice that

unx,t=i=1nϕ1ix,t.(42)

By using Eq. (38) after applying the norm on the Eq. (41), one can get

ϕnx,t1αBαηϕ(n1)x,t+αBαΓαη0tϕ(n1)x,ζdζ.(43)

We prove the following theorem by using the above result.

Theorem 4

The solution for the system (27) will exist and unique if we have specific t0 then

1αBαη+αBαΓαη<1.

Proof

Let us consider the bounded function u(x, t) satisfying the Lipschitz condition. Then, by Eqs. (42) and (44), we have

ϕix,tunx,01αBαη+αBαΓαηn.(44)

Therefore, the continuity as well as existence for the obtained solutions is proved. Subsequently, in order to show the Eq. (44) is a solution for the Eq. (29), we consider

ux,tux,0=unx,tKnx,t.(45)

In order to obtain require a result, we consider

Knx,t=1αBαGx,t,uG(x,t,un1)+αBαΓα0ttζμ1Gx,ζ,uGx,ζ,un1dζ1αBαGx,t,uGx,t,un1+αBαΓα0tGx,ζ,uGx,ζ,un1dζ1αBαηuun1+αBαΓαηuun1t.(46)

Similarly, at t0 we can obtain

Knx,t1αBα+αt0BαΓαn+1ηn+1M.(47)

As n approaches to ∞, we can see that form Eq. (50), ∥Kn(x, t)∥ tends to 0.

Next, it is a necessity to demonstrate uniqueness for the solution of the considered model. Suppose u*(x, t) be the other solution, then we have

ux,tux,t=1αBα(Gx,t,uG(x,t,u))+αBαΓα0t(Gx,ζ,uG(x,ζ,u))dζ.(48)

On applying norm, the Eq. (48) simplifies to

ux,tux,t=1αBα(Gx,t,uG(x,t,u))+αBαΓα0t(Gx,ζ,uG(x,ζ,u))dζ1αBαηux,tux,t+αBαΓαηtux,tux,t.(49)

On simplification

ux,tux,t(11αBαηαBαΓαηt)0.(50)

From the above condition, it is clear that u(x, t) − u*(x, t), if

(11αBαηαBαΓαηt)0.(51)

Hence, Eq. (51) evidences our essential result.

Theorem 5

Suppose un(x, t) and u(x, t) define in the Banach space (B[0, T], ∥ ⋅ ∥). Then series solution defined in Eq. (26) converges to the solution of the Eq. (10), if 0 < λ1 < 1.

Proof

Let consider the sequence {Sn} and which is the partial sum of the Eq. (26), we have to prove {Sn} is Cauchy sequence in (B[0, T], ∥ ⋅ ∥). Now consider

Sn+1x,tSnx,t=un+1x,tλ1unx,tλ12un1x,tλ1n+1u0x,t.

Now, we have for every n, mN (mn)

SnSm=SnSn1+Sn1Sn2++Sm+1SmSnSn1+Sn1Sn2++Sm+1Smλ1n+λ1n1++λ1m+1u0λ1m+1λ1nm1+λ1nm2++λ1+1u0λ1m+11λ1nm1λ1u0.(52)

But 0 < λ1 < 1, therefore limn,m→∞SnSm∥ = 0. Hence, {Sn}is the Cauchy sequence. Similarly, we can demonstrate for the second case. This proves the required result.

Theorem 6

For the series solution (26) of the Eq. (10), the maximum absolute error is presented as

ux,tn=0Mun(x,t)λ1M+11λ1u0x,t.

Proof

By the help of Eq. (56), we get

ux,tSn=λ1m+11λ1nm1λ1u0x,t.

But 0 < λ1 < 0 ⇒ 1 − λ1nm < 1. Hence, we have

ux,tn=0Mun(x,t)λ1M+11λ1u0x,t.

This ends the proof.

6 Results and discussion

In this manuscript, we find the solution for CDG equation having arbitrary order using a novel scheme namely, q-HATM with the help of Mittag-Leffler law. In the present segment, we demonstrate the effect of fractional order in the obtained solution with distinct parameters offered by the future method. In Figures 1 to 3, the nature of q-HATM solution for different arbitrary order is presented in terms of 2D plots. From these plots, we can see that considered problem conspicuously depends on fractional order. In order to analyse the behaviour of obtained solution with respect to homotopy parameter (), the -curves are drowned for diverse μ and presented in Figure 4. In the plots, the horizontal line represents the convergence region of the q-HATM solution and these curves aid us to adjust and handle the convergence province of the solution. For an appropriate value of , the achieved solution quickly converges to the exact solution. Further, the small variation in the physical behaviour of the complex models stimulates the enormous new results to analyse and understand nature in a better and systematic manner. Moreover, from all the plots we can see that the considered method is more accurate and very effective to analyse the considered complex coupled fractional order equations.

Figure 1 (a) Surface of u(x, t), (b) 2D plot of u(x, t) at t = 10 at μ = 0.5, ℏ = −1, n = 1 and α = 0.5.
Figure 1

(a) Surface of u(x, t), (b) 2D plot of u(x, t) at t = 10 at μ = 0.5, = −1, n = 1 and α = 0.5.

Figure 2 (a) Surface of u(x, t), (b) 2D plot of u(x, t) at t = 10 at μ = 0.5, ℏ = −1, n = 1 and α = 0.75.
Figure 2

(a) Surface of u(x, t), (b) 2D plot of u(x, t) at t = 10 at μ = 0.5, = −1, n = 1 and α = 0.75.

Figure 3 (a) Surface of u(x, t), (b) 2D plot of u(x, t) at t = 10 at μ = 0.5, ℏ = −1, n = 1 and α = 1.
Figure 3

(a) Surface of u(x, t), (b) 2D plot of u(x, t) at t = 10 at μ = 0.5, = −1, n = 1 and α = 1.

Figure 4 ℏ-curves for q-HATM solution with distinct α at x = 1 and t = 0.01 for (a) n = 1 and (b) n = 2.
Figure 4

-curves for q-HATM solution with distinct α at x = 1 and t = 0.01 for (a) n = 1 and (b) n = 2.

7 Conclusion

In this study, the q-HATM is applied lucratively to find the solution for arbitrary order CDG equations. Since AB derivatives and integrals having fractional order are defined with the help of generalized Mittag-Leffler function as the non-singular and non-local kernel, the present investigation illuminates the effeteness of the considered derivative. The existence and uniqueness of the obtained solution are demonstrated with the fixed point hypothesis. The results obtained by the future scheme are more stimulating as compared to results available in the literature. Further, the projected algorithm finds the solution for the nonlinear problem without considering any discretization, perturbation or transformations. The present investigation illuminates, the considered nonlinear phenomena noticeably depend on the time history and the time instant and which can be proficiently analysed by applying the concept of calculus with fractional order. The present investigation helps the researchers to study the behaviour nonlinear problems gives very interesting and useful consequences. Lastly, we can conclude the projected method is extremely methodical, more effective and very accurate, and which can be applied to analyse the diverse classes of nonlinear problems arising in science and technology.


Tel. No.: +91 8095907689

References

[1] Liouville J., Memoire surquelques questions de geometrieet de mecanique, et sur un nouveau genre de calcul pour resoudreces questions, J. Ecole. Polytech., 1832, 13, 1-69.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Riemann G.F.B., Versuch Einer Allgemeinen Auffassung der Integration und Differentiation, Gesammelte Mathematische Werke, Leipzig, 1896.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Caputo M., Elasticita e Dissipazione, Zanichelli, Bologna, 1969.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Miller K.S., Ross B., An introduction to fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, A Wiley, New York, 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Podlubny I., Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, New York, 1999.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Kilbas A.A., Srivastava H.M., Trujillo J.J., Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Baleanu D., Guvenc Z.B., Machado J.A.T., New trends in nanotechnology and fractional calculus applications, Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg, London New York, 2010.10.1007/978-90-481-3293-5Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Gao W., Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Baskonus H.M., Novel dynamic structures of 2019-nCoV with nonlocal operator via powerful computational technique, Biology, 2020, 9(5), 107, 10.3390/biology9050107Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Baskonus H.M., Solving smoking epidemic model of fractional order using a modified homotopy analysis transform method, Math. Sci., 2019, 13(2), 115–12810.1007/s40096-019-0284-6Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Baleanu D., Wu G.C., Zeng S.D., Chaos analysis and asymptotic stability of generalized Caputo fractional differential equations, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 2017, 102, 99-10510.1016/j.chaos.2017.02.007Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Baskonus H.M., New numerical surfaces to the mathematical model of cancer chemotherapy effect in Caputo fractional derivatives, Chaos, 2019, 29(013119), 10.1063/1.5074099Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Baskonus H.M., Sulaiman T.A., Bulut H., On the new wave behavior to the Klein-Gordon-Zakharov equations in plasma physics, Indian J. Phys., 2019, 93 (3), 393-39910.1007/s12648-018-1262-9Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Kumar D., Baleanu D., Singh J., An efficient computational technique for fractional model of generalized Hirota-Satsuma coupled Korteweg–de Vries and coupled modified Korteweg–de Vries equations, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam., 2020, 15(7), 071003.10.1115/1.4046898Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Baleanu D., An efficient numerical technique for the nonlinear fractional Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov equation, Mathematics, 2019, 7(3), 10.3390/math7030265Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Goufo F.D., Kumar S., Mugisha S.B., Similarities in a fifth-order evolution equation with and with no singular kernel, Chaos Solit. Fract., 2020, 130.10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109467Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Gao W., Ghanbari B., Baskonus H.M., New numerical simulations for some real world problems with Atangana–Baleanu fractional derivative, Chaos Solit. Fract., 2020, 128, 34-43.10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.037Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Ghanbari B., Kumar S., Kumar R., A study of behaviour for immune and tumor cells in immunogenetic tumour model with non-singular fractional derivative, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 2020, 133, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109619Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Gao W., Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Baskonus H.M., Yel G., New approach for the model describing the deathly disease in pregnant women using Mittag-Leffler function, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 2020, 134, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109696Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Kumar S., Nisar K.S., Kumar R., Cattani C., Samet B., A new Rabotnov fractional-exponential function based fractional derivative for diffusion equation under external force, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 2020, 43(7), 4460-4471.10.1002/mma.6208Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., An efficient technique for two-dimensional fractional order biological population model, International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing, 2020 (in press), 10.1142/S1793962320500051Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Sulaiman T.A., Bulut H., Baskonus H.M., Optical solitons to the fractional perturbed NLSE in nano-fibers, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 2020, 13(3), 925-93610.3934/dcdss.2020054Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Jleli M., Kumar S., Kumar R., Samet B., Analytical approach for time fractional wave equations in the sense of Yang-Abdel-Aty-Cattani via the homotopy perturbation transform method, Alexandria Eng. J., 2020 (in press), 10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.022Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Gao W., Silambarasan R., Baskonus H.M., Anand R.V., Rezazadeh H., Periodic waves of the non dissipative double dispersive micro strain wave in the micro structured solids, Phys. A, 2020, 545, 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123772Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Kumar S., Kumar A., Abbas S., Qurashi M.A., Baleanu D., A modified analytical approach with existence and uniqueness for fractional Cauchy reaction-diffusion equations, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020, 28, 10.1186/s13662-019-2488-3Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Kumar S., Kumar R., Agarwal R.P., Samet B., A study of fractional Lotka-Volterra population model using Haar wavelet and Adams-Bashforth-Moulton methods, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 2020, 43(8), 5564-557810.1002/mma.6297Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Veeresha P., Baskonus H.M., Prakasha D.G., Gao W., Yel G., Regarding new numerical solution of fractional Schistosomiasis disease arising in biological phenomena, Chaos Solit. Fract., 2020, 133, 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109661Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Kumar S., Kumar R., Singh J., Nisar K.S., Kumar D., An efficient numerical scheme for fractional model of HIV-1 infection of CD4+ T-Cells with the effect of antiviral drug therapy, Alexandria Eng. J., 2020, (in press), 10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.046Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Kumar S., Ghosh S., Samet B., Goufo E.F.D., An analysis for heat equations arises in diffusion process using new Yang-Abdel-Aty Cattani fractional operator, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 2020, (in press), 10.1002/mma.6347Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Alshabanat A., Jleli M., Kumar S., Samet B., Generalization of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative and applications to electrical circuits, Front. Phys., 2020, (in press) 10.3389/fphy.2020.00064Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Prakasha D.G., Veeresha P., Analysis of Lakes pollution model with Mittag-Leffler kernel, J. Ocean Eng. Sci., 2020, (in press), 10.1016/j.joes.2020.01.004Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Ravichandran C., Logeswari K., Jarad F., New results on existence in the framework of Atangana–Baleanu derivative for fractional integro-differential equations, Chaos Solit. Fract., 2019, 125, 194-200.10.1016/j.chaos.2019.05.014Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Ravichandran C., Jothimani K., Baskonus H.M., Valliammal N., New results on nondensely characterized integrodifferential equations with fractional order, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 2018, 133(3), 10.1140/epjp/i2018-11966-3Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Gao W., Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Baskonus H.M., Yel G., New numerical results for the time-fractional Phi-four equation using a novel analytical approach, Symmetry2020, 12(3), 10.3390/sym12030478Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Solution for fractional generalized Zakharov equations with Mittag-Leffler function, Results Eng., 2020, 5, (in press) 10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100085Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Nikkar A., Vahidi J., Ghomi M.J., Mighani M., Reconstruction of variational iterative method for solving fifth order Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon (CDG) equation, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Invest., 2012, 1(6), 38-41.Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Bibi S., Ahmed N., Faisal I., Mohyud-Din S.T., Rafiq M., Khan U., Some new solutions of the Caudrey–Dodd–Gibbon (CDG) equation using the conformable derivative, Adv. Diff. Equat. 2019, 89.10.1186/s13662-019-2030-7Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Salas A., Some solutions for a type of generalized Sawada-Kotera equation, Appl. Math. Comp., 2008, 196(2), 812-817.10.1016/j.amc.2007.07.013Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Weiss J., On Classes of Integrable Systems and the Painleve’ Property, J. Math. Phys., 1984, 25(1), 13-24.10.1063/1.526009Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Dai Z.D., Liu J., Liu Z.J., Exact periodic kink-wave and degenerative soliton solutions for potential Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation, Commum. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 2010, 15(9), 2331-2336.10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.09.037Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Dai Z.D., Huang J., Jiang M.R., Wang S.H., Homoclinic orbits and periodic solitons for Boussinesq equation with even constraint, Chaos Solit. Fract., 2005, 26(4), 1189-1194.10.1016/j.chaos.2005.02.025Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Caputo M., Fabrizio M., A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl., 2015, 1(2), 73-85.Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Atangana A., Baleanu D., New fractional derivatives with non-local and non-singular kernel theory and application to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci., 2016, 20, 763-769.10.2298/TSCI160111018ASuche in Google Scholar

[43] Liao S.J., Homotopy analysis method: a new analytic method for nonlinear problems, Appl. Math. Mech., 1998, 19, 957-962.10.1007/BF02457955Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Singh J., Kumar D., Swroop R., Numerical solution of time- and space-fractional coupled Burgers’ equations via homotopy algorithm, Alexandria Eng. J., 2016, 55(2), 1753-1763.10.1016/j.aej.2016.03.028Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Srivastava H.M., Kumar D., Singh J., An efficient analytical technique for fractional model of vibration equation, Appl. Math. Model., 2017, 45, 192-204.10.1016/j.apm.2016.12.008Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Gao W., Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Senel B., Baskonus H.M., Iterative method applied to the fractional nonlinear systems arising in thermoelasticity with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Fractals, 2020, (in press), 10.1142/S0218348X2040040XSuche in Google Scholar

[47] Prakasha D.G., Veeresha P., Singh J., Fractional approach for equation describing the water transport in unsaturated porous media with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Front. Phys., 2019, 7, 193).10.3389/fphy.2019.00193Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Solution for fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equations by using two reliable techniques, Chinese J. Phys., 2019, 60, 313-330.10.1016/j.cjph.2019.05.009Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Kumar D., Agarwal R.P., Singh J., A modified numerical scheme and convergence analysis for fractional model of Lienard’s equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2018,399, 405-413.10.1016/j.cam.2017.03.011Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Baskonus H.M., An efficient technique for coupled fractional Whitham-Broer-Kaup equations describing the propagation of shallow water waves, Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2020, 49-75.10.1007/978-3-030-39112-6_4Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Baskonus H.M., Novel simulations to the time-fractional Fisher’s equation, Math. Sci., 2019, 13(1), 33-42.10.1007/s40096-019-0276-6Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Prakash A., Veeresha P., Prakasha D.G., Goyal M., A homotopy technique for fractional order multi-dimensional telegraph equation via Laplace transform, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 2019, 134, 19.10.1140/epjp/i2019-12411-ySuche in Google Scholar

[53] Veeresha P., Baskonus H.M., Prakasha D.G., Gao W., Yel G., Regarding new numerical solution of fractional Schistosomiasis disease arising in biological phenomena, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 2020, 133.10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109661Suche in Google Scholar

[54] Xu Y.-G., Zhou X.-W., Yao L., Solving the fifth order Caudrey–Dodd–Gibbon (CDG) equation using the exp-function method, Appl. Math. Comput., 2008, 206, 70–73.10.1016/j.amc.2008.08.052Suche in Google Scholar

[55] Chan W.L., Zheng Y., Bäcklund transformations for the Caudrey–Dodd–Gibbon–Sawada–Kotera equation and its λ-modified equation, J. Math. Phys., 1989, 30(9), 2065-2068.10.1063/1.528245Suche in Google Scholar

[56] Chen H., Xu Z., Dai Z., Breather soliton and cross two-soliton solutions for the fifth order Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon (CDG) equation, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 2015, 25(3), 651-655.10.1108/HFF-04-2014-0116Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Karaagac B., A numerical approach to Caudrey Dodd Gibbon equation via collocation method using quintic B-spline basis, TWMS J. App. Eng. Math., 2019, 9(1), 1-8.Suche in Google Scholar

[58] Abdollahzadeh M., Hosseini M., Ghanbarpour M., Shirvani H., Exact travelling solutions for fifth order Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon equation, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput., 2010, 2(4), 81–90.Suche in Google Scholar

[59] Jiang B., Bi Q., A study on the bilinear Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon equation, Nonlinear Anal., 2010, 72, 4530-4533.10.1016/j.na.2010.02.030Suche in Google Scholar

[60] Salas A.H., Hurtado O.G., Castillo J.E., Computing multi-soliton solutions to Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon equation by Hirota’s method, Int. J. Phys. Sci., 2011, 6(34), 7729–7737.Suche in Google Scholar

[61] Geng X., He G., Wu L., Riemann theta function solutions of the Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-Sawada-Kotera hierarchy, J. Geom. Phys., 2019, 140, 85-103.10.1016/j.geomphys.2019.01.005Suche in Google Scholar

[62] Singh J., Kumarv, Hammouch Z., Atangana A., A fractional epidemiological model for computer viruses pertaining to a new fractional derivative, Appl. Math. Comput., 2018, 316, 504-515.10.1016/j.amc.2017.08.048Suche in Google Scholar

[63] Prakasha D.G., Veeresha P., Baskonus H.M., Analysis of the dynamics of hepatitis E virus using the Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2019, 134, 241.10.1140/epjp/i2019-12590-5Suche in Google Scholar

[64] Atangana A., Alkahtani B.T., Analysis of the Keller-Segel model with a fractional derivative without singular kernel, Entropy, 2015, 17, 4439-4453.10.3390/e17064439Suche in Google Scholar

[65] Atangana A., Alkahtani B.T., Analysis of non- homogenous heat model with new trend of derivative with fractional order, Chaos Solit. Fract., 2016, 89, 566-571.10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.027Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-11-25
Accepted: 2020-05-25
Published Online: 2020-08-02

© 2020 P. Veeresha and D. G. Prakasha, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Comparison of the method of variation of parameters to semi-analytical methods for solving nonlinear boundary value problems in engineering
  2. Nonlinear H-infinity control for switched reluctance machines
  3. Energy flow of a 2018 FIA F1 racing car and proposed changes to the powertrain rules
  4. Risk index to monitor an anaerobic digester using a dynamic model based on dilution rate, temperature, and pH
  5. MHD Peristaltic flow of a nanofluid in a constricted artery for different shapes of nanosized particles
  6. Comparative study of homotopy perturbation transformation with homotopy perturbation Elzaki transform method for solving nonlinear fractional PDE
  7. Approximate method for solving strongly fractional nonlinear problems using fuzzy transform
  8. Numerical approach to MHD flow of power-law fluid on a stretching sheet with non-uniform heat source
  9. Entropy generation in an inclined porous channel with suction/injection
  10. Heat transfer from convecting-radiating fin through optimized Chebyshev polynomials with interior point algorithm
  11. Two dimensional simulation of laminar flow by three- jet in a semi-confined space
  12. Influence of temperature-dependent properties on a gravity-driven thin film along inclined plate
  13. Simulation and time-frequency analysis of the longitudinal train dynamics coupled with a nonlinear friction draft gear
  14. Study of differential transform technique for transient hydromagnetic Jeffrey fluid flow from a stretching sheet
  15. Generalized second-order slip for unsteady convective flow of a nanofluid: a utilization of Buongiorno’s two-component nonhomogeneous equilibrium model
  16. Numerical treatment for the solution of singularly perturbed pseudo-parabolic problem on an equidistributed grid
  17. Relative sea-level rise and land subsidence in Oceania from tide gauge and satellite GPS
  18. On finite series solutions of conformable time-fractional Cahn-Allen equation
  19. A generalized perspective of Fourier and Fick’s laws: Magnetized effects of Cattaneo-Christov models on transient nanofluid flow between two parallel plates with Brownian motion and thermophoresis
  20. MHD natural convection flow of Casson fluid in an annular microchannel containing porous medium with heat generation/absorption
  21. Numerical simulation of variable thermal conductivity on 3D flow of nanofluid over a stretching sheet
  22. Two meshless methods for solving nonlinear ordinary differential equations in engineering and applied sciences
  23. Thermoelastic analysis of FGM hollow cylinder for variable parameters and temperature distributions using FEM
  24. Qualitative analysis for two fractional difference equations
  25. MHD fractionalized Jeffrey fluid over an accelerated slipping porous plate
  26. Nonlinear analysis of high accuracy and reliability in traffic flow prediction
  27. Numerical solution of time-dependent Emden-Fowler equations using bivariate spectral collocation method on overlapping grids
  28. A reliable analytical technique for fractional Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon equation with Mittag-Leffler kernel
  29. Accelerated HPSTM: An efficient semi-analytical technique for the solution of nonlinear PDE’s
  30. Effect of magnetized variable thermal conductivity on flow and heat transfer characteristics of unsteady Williamson fluid
  31. Couple stress fluid flow due to slow steady oscillations of a permeable sphere
  32. State-of-the-art of MW-level capacity oceanic current turbines
  33. Approximate solution for fractional attractor one-dimensional Keller-Segel equations using homotopy perturbation sumudu transform method
  34. Nonlinear absolute sea-level patterns in the long-term-trend tide gauges of the West Coast of North America
  35. Insight into the dynamics of non-Newtonian Casson fluid over a rotating non-uniform surface subject to Coriolis force
  36. Mixed convection flow in a vertical channel in the presence of wall conduction, variable thermal conductivity and viscosity
  37. A new structure formulations for cubic B-spline collocation method in three and four-dimensions
  38. Mathematical and numerical optimality of non-singular fractional approaches on free and forced linear oscillator
  39. MHD mixed convection on an inclined stretching plate in Darcy porous medium with Soret effect and variable surface conditions
  40. Comparative study of two techniques on some nonlinear problems based ussing conformable derivative
Heruntergeladen am 11.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nleng-2020-0018/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen