Startseite The Jade Straitjacket: Measuring Reactions to China’s Rise
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Jade Straitjacket: Measuring Reactions to China’s Rise

  • Felipe Herrera ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 25. März 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Since the Cold War, the Global South has become the basis of China’s political, economic, and military interests, as well as the major theater of China’s power competition with the United States. It is thus necessary to recognize how developing states have responded to changes in the international system brought on by China’s rise. Given the tide of nativism opposing trade and globalization, mostly studied through a Western lens, this study extends the analysis to the attitudes of the Global South. I outline the Western reaction to China’s rise to differentiate the factors that provoke backlash in the developed and developing world. Analyzing the relationship between China’s economic engagement and the degree of anti-China sentiment in a given region, as compared to the same relationships for the United States, I provide an amendment to Friedman’s “Golden Straitjacket” thesis to better understand China’s role in the processes of globalization and discuss the implications of the relationship between trade and domestic attitudes on the liberal theory of trade interdependence and conflict. I argue that since China’s “Jade Straitjacket” is a destabilizing force that provokes negative backlash stronger than reactions to American trade based on the findings of this study, policymakers must contend with the disconnect between elites who make the decision to don the straitjacket and domestic audiences who react adversely to the societal ramifications of these decisions.

Appendix

Figure 1: Countries analyzed in this study grouped by region based on the World Integrated Trade Solutions (WITS) database classifications, available at https://wits.worldbank.org/.
Figure 1:

Countries analyzed in this study grouped by region based on the World Integrated Trade Solutions (WITS) database classifications, available at https://wits.worldbank.org/.

References

Albert, Eleanor. “China in Africa.” Council on Foreign Relations, July 12, 2017, www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-africa. Accessed February 24, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

Appelbaum, Binyamin. “On Trade, Donald Trump Breaks with 200 Years of Economic Orthodoxy.” The New York Times, January 19, 2018. www.nytimes.com/2016/03/11/us/politics/-trade-donald-trump-breaks-200-years-economic-orthodoxy-mercantilism.html.Suche in Google Scholar

Autor, David, et al. 2016. “The China Shock: Learning from Labor Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade.” Annual Review of Economics 8: 205–40. doi:10.3386/w21906.Suche in Google Scholar

Canuto, Otaviano. “How Chinese Investment in Latin America Is Changing.” Americas Quarterly. Accessed March 12, 2019. www.americasquarterly.org/content/how-chinese-investment-latin-america-changing.Suche in Google Scholar

Copeland, Dale C. 1996. “Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations.” International Security 20 (4): 5–41. doi:10.2307/2539041.Suche in Google Scholar

“DataBank | the World Bank.” Accessed 10 November 2019. https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx.Suche in Google Scholar

DiGiuseppe, Matthew, and Katja B. Kleinberg. 2018. “Economics, Security, and Individual-Level Preferences for Trade Agreements.” International Interactions 45 (2): 1–27. doi:10.1080/03050629.2019.1551007.Suche in Google Scholar

Eom, Janet, et al. 2018. The Path Ahead: the 7th Forum on China-Africa Cooperation. China Africa Research Initiative, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies Washington, DC.Suche in Google Scholar

Faulconbridge, Guy. “In England’s Forgotten ‘Rust Belt,’ Voters Show Little Sign of … ” Reuters, Accessed August 8, 2018. www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-voters/in-englands-forgotten-rust-belt-voters-show-little-sign-of-brexit-regret-idUSKBN1KS0VM.Suche in Google Scholar

Friedman, Thomas L. 2012. The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization. London: Picador.Suche in Google Scholar

Gartzke, Erik. 2007. “The Capitalist Peace.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 166–91.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00244.xSuche in Google Scholar

“The GDELT Story: about the GDELT Project,” Accessed September 22, 2019. https://www.gdeltproject.org/about.html.Suche in Google Scholar

Hussain, Tom. “Pakistan’s Khan Slams IMF, Then Seeks Bailout. Why the Change?” South China Morning Post, Accessed October 15, 2018. www.scmp.com/news/asia/south-asia/article/2168507/pakistans-khan-slams-imf-then-seeks-bailout-why-change.Suche in Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. “The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism after America.” Foreign Affairs 90(3): 56–68.Suche in Google Scholar

“INSCR Data Page.” Accessed November 10, 2019. https://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Keith, and Elias Groll. “As West Grows Wary, Chinese Investment Plummets.” Foreign Policy, Accessed January 14, 2019. www.foreignpolicy.com/2019/01/14/chinese-investment-in-the-united-states-and-europe-plummets/.Suche in Google Scholar

Kaczmarski, Marcin. 2017. “Non-Western Visions of Regionalism: China’s New Silk Road and Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union.” International Affairs 93, no. 6 (November): 1357–76. doi:10.1093/ia/iix182.Suche in Google Scholar

Kallis, Aristotle. 2018. “Populism, Sovereigntism, and the Unlikely Re-Emergence of the Territorial Nation-State.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 11, no. 3 (September): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-018-0233-z.Suche in Google Scholar

Klein, Jodi Xu. “It’s Not Just the U.S.: Around the World, Doors are Shutting on Chinese Investment.” POLITICO, Accessed September 13, 2018. www.politico.com/story/2018/09/13/china-us-investment-788834.Suche in Google Scholar

Lapper, Richard. “Bolsonaro Took Aim at China. Then Reality Struck.” Americas Quarterly, April 23, 2019. www.americasquarterly.org/content/china-brazil-trade.Suche in Google Scholar

Larmer, Brook. “A Malaysian Insta-City Becomes A Flash Point for Chinese Colonialism – and Capital Flight.” The New York Times, Accessed March 13, 2018. www.nytimes.com/2018/03/13/magazine/a-malaysian-insta-city-becomes-a-flash-point-for-chinese-colonialism-and-capital-flight.html.Suche in Google Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and Bryan Rosendorff. 2000. “Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade.” American Political Science Review 94, no. 2 (June): 305–21.10.1142/9789814644297_0007Suche in Google Scholar

Marino, Peter. “Inside the Growing Backlash against China.” Reuters, Accessed January 9, 2018. www.reuters.com/article/us-marino-china-commentary/commentary-inside-the-growing-backlash-against-china-idUSKBN1EY236.Suche in Google Scholar

Mendis, Patrick, and Joey Wang. “China’s Era of Debt-Trap Diplomacy May Pave the Way for Something Sinister.” The National Interest, Accessed February 12, 2019. nationalinterest.org/feature/chinas-era-debt-trap-diplomacy-may-pave-way-something-sinister-42927.Suche in Google Scholar

Morrow, James D. 1999. “How Could Trade Affect Conflict?.” Journal of Peace Research 36 (4): 481–89. doi:10.1177/0022343399036004006.Suche in Google Scholar

Oneal, John R., and Bruce Russett. 1999. “Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 36 (4): 423–42. doi:10.1177/0022343399036004003.Suche in Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani. 2018. “Populism and the Economics of Globalization.” Journal of International Business Policy 1, no. 1–2 (February): 12–33. doi:10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Sauvant, Karl P., and Michael D. Nolan. 2016. “China’s Rising Outward FDI, Its Reception in Host Countries, and Implications for International Investment Law and Policy.” In Regulating the Visible Hand?: the Institutional Implications of Chinese State Capitalism, edited by Benjamin L. Liebman, and Curtis J. Milhaupt, 285–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190250256.003.0012Suche in Google Scholar

Scheve, Kenneth F., and Matthew J. Slaughter. “How to Save Globalization: Rebuilding America’s Ladder of Opportunity.” Foreign Affairs, Accessed February 19, 2019. www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2018-10-15/how-save-globalization.Suche in Google Scholar

Scobell, Andrew, et al. 2018. At the Dawn of Belt and Road: China in the Developing World. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.10.7249/RR2273Suche in Google Scholar

Soderberg, Nancy. 2015. “Time to Bring the United Nations Security Council into the Twenty-first Century.” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 16(2): 39–46.Suche in Google Scholar

Starmans, Christina, et al. 2017. “Why People Prefer Unequal Societies.” Nature Human Behaviour 1 (4). doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0082.Suche in Google Scholar

Trevisani, Paulo. “Brazil Deepens China Ties in About-Face.” Wall Street Journal, Accessed November 14, 2019. https://www.wsj.com/articles/brazil-deepens-china-ties-in-about-face-11573772734.Suche in Google Scholar

“WITS – About WITS,” Accessed September 22, 2019, https://wits.worldbank.org/about_wits.html.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-03-25
Published in Print: 2020-04-28

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 13.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ngs-2019-0022/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen