Abstract
Optical Stokes skyrmions represent an emerging class of structured light characterized by intricate topological polarization textures in the beam’s transverse plane. Traditional methods for generating Stokes skyrmions rely on bulky optical setups, driving significant interests in compact, single-device solutions. However, existing approaches fail to ensure propagation-invariant topology, an imperative requirement for advancing applications in this field. In this paper we address this fundamental challenge with a metasurface design based on structural birefringence and geometric phase which manipulates light in dynamic phase iso-curves, achieving arbitrary co-polarization to cross-polarization conversion while maintaining a constant dynamic phase. This design enables propagation-invariant topological features of optical skyrmions produced by a single generation device. Our framework offers a compact platform for shaping topologically stable optical skyrmions, which may stimulate their applications for long-range optical information transfer.
1 Introduction
Optical skyrmions have emerged in recent years as an attractive family of topological structured light [1]. Contrary to conventional beam shaping focusing on tailoring spatial modes, the orbital (OAM) and spin angular momenta (SAM), topological structured light consists on combining these fundamental degrees of freedom to embody different topologies in an optical beam [2], [3]. Stokes skyrmions, a class of full Poincaré beams fulfilling a topological map [4], [5], [6], [7], are the most common category of optical skyrmions, in which the polarization state at each transverse plane spans the entire surface of the Poincaré sphere (PS). Significant research efforts have been done to implement topological textures using different optical fields such as SAM [8], [9], [10], [11], electric field in tightly focused beams [12], [13], evanescent fields [14], [15], [16], energy flow [17], to name a few. However, most of them rely on non-propagating light fields in a tight focus or bounded to plasmonic surfaces, making them unsuitable for long-range information transfer. In contrast, Stokes skyrmions are of paraxial nature and can propagate their topology over arbitrary diffraction distances, offering an attractive platform for optical information processing.
Conventional generation of Stokes skyrmions relies on technologies for vector beam generation, such as combination of spatial light modulators (SLMs), digital micromirror devices (DMDs), beam displacers and wave retarders, making the generation stage remarkably bulky [18], [19], [20], [21]. In this regard, metasurfaces (MS) have revolutionized the field of light manipulation, offering a great platform with unprecedented subwavelength spatial resolution and thickness, remarkable lightweight and multi-functionalities in a single device [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. Dielectric MSs cover a wide range of the electromagnetic spectrum from UV to infrared [28], [29], the applications of which include ultra-thin and achromatic metalenses [30], [31], [32], beam steering [33], [34], holography [35], [36], [37], polarization control and detection [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], vortex generators [39], [46], [47], [48], [49], to name a few. Recently, dielectric MSs have been used as ultra-compact optical skyrmion generators, the design of which includes geometric and dynamic phase-only modulation, in which different topologies were achieved for different circular polarizations [50], or dynamic phase-only modulation in linear polarization with ultra-compact on-fibre fabrication [51]. Other compact generators, so-called skyrmionic wave-plates [52] and GRIN lenses [53], have been designed based on simultaneous control of structural birefringence and geometric phase. In general, these designs yield complementary amplitude profiles shaped in the co-polarized (CoP) and cross-polarized (CrP) waves due to the spatially-varying birefringence, and a spatially varying wavefront in the CrP wave due to the geometric phase. Although all of the previous methods can generate optical skyrmions at a certain propagation plane, none of them has achieved propagation-invariant topology, the crucial property for practical robust information transfer. The reasons arise from the fact that free-space eigenmodes in both polarization components must be generated in order to achieve a propagation-invariant topology. First, phase-only designs [50], [51] cannot deal with this problem due to the lack of amplitude modulation. On the other hand, although the designs based on spatially-varying birefringence and rotation offer amplitude and phase control [52], [54], the dynamic phase induces an additional wavefront in the CoP wave that cannot be compensated by the geometric phase, disrupting the topology upon propagation.
In this paper, we address the challenge of generating Stokes skyrmions with stable topology upon propagation from a single device, which constitutes a step further in realizing compact generators of skyrmionic beams. In the emerging paradigm of topological structured light, distinct optical states exhibit different topologies, making compact generation and topological stability during propagation equally imperative. Here we present a dielectric MS that modulates light at the dynamic phase iso-curves, which allows for spatial control of the structural birefringence and the geometric phase while simultaneously revoking the dynamic phase in both CoP and CrP waves (Figure 1). With this design we have achieved topological invariance of the generated optical skyrmions, featuring a remarkably stable skyrmion number upon diffraction. The lightweight and ultra-thin nature of the designed MSs makes them highly suitable for on-fibre integration, expanding their potential for versatile photonic systems. This compact framework paves the way for possible applications in robust optical communications based on topological structured light.

Conceptual figure: Metasurface generating Stokes skyrmions with propagation-invariant topology.
2 Numerical design
Stokes skyrmionic beams can be described as asymmetric counterparts of cylindrical vector beams (CVBs). One can consider a standard spin–orbit coupled CVB in the Laguerre–Gaussian (LG) spatial basis E CVB( r ) = LGl,0( r ) u L + eiζ · LG−l,0( r ) u R , and convert it into a skyrmionic beam by introducing spin–orbit symmetry breaking, for instance substituting LG−l,0( r ) by LG0,0( r ):
with ζ an arbitrary intermodal phase,
can be stable over arbitrarily long propagation distances. In (2) the spatially varying vector
s
=
s
(
r
) denotes the inhomogeneous normalized Stokes vector, representing the polarization state at each point of the transverse plane. The Stokes vector is defined as
We proceed to describe the response of our MS through its Jones matrix elements, see Supplementary information (SI) S1. For an arbitrary meta-atom shape and orientation, and for left-handed circularly polarized input light E in = u L , the output polarization state can be expressed as
where the complex field has been decomposed in its co-polarized (CoP) and cross-polarized (CrP) components, in this case LCP and RCP, respectively. In a simplified description of the transmission we can consider that the Jones matrix is unitary, i.e.
which ranges from 0, isotropic plate, to 1, half-wave plate (HWP), for increasing phase difference between 0 and π. The transmission through the MS in this simplified unitary approach reads
where we have made explicit that all the magnitudes (ξ, Δϕ, θ) are position-dependent. The DOB determines the relative amplitudes between the CoP and CrP waves, while the rotation θ defines their relative phases.
A global phase factor
As seen above, the Stokes parameters do not depend on the dynamic phase
For our specific goal, the dynamic phase causes a given skyrmion texture at the output plane z = z0 to collapse after propagating a certain distance to z = z f , disrupting its topological features. Since no geometric phase approach can be used to overcome this challenge, in this paper we design an MS that compensates the dynamic phase ξ using the shape of the meta-atoms instead of the rotation, so that ξ remains constant for any value of the DOB for both CoP and CrP waves. In short, our MS performs full CrP/CoP amplitude modulation by the tuning the DOB, and at the same time the amplitude modulation has no effect on the shape of the wavefront of neither the CoP nor the CrP waves.
A preliminary simulation is carried out using gRCWA [57] at the telecommunications wavelength λ = 1.55 μm, the results are shown in Figure 2. As depicted in 2(a) we have chosen a-Si meta-atoms with elliptical cross-section and constant height h = 800 nm laying on top of a quartz (SiO2) substrate. The unit cell is square with array pitch P = 650 nm. At first, we simply sweep the two principal diameters of the ellipses (D1, D2) in a range where we can achieve maximal polarization conversion efficiency, from 210 nm to 535 nm. The input light is circularly polarized (LCP) and the output light is decomposed into the CoP (LCP) and CrP (RCP) components. The phase (a1) and amplitude (a2) of the CoP component, and the same (b1) and (b2) for the CrP component are shown. The line D1 = D2 delimits the isotropic meta-atoms yielding zero CrP amplitude, while when we move away from it the CrP amplitude increases until it reaches maximum conversion efficiency. As noted in (a2) and (b2), different trajectories in the parametric space (D1, D2) can be chosen in order to achieve a full CoP to CrP amplitude modulation, but each trajectory acquires a different dynamic phase, we have highlighted two for comparison. As seen in (d1)-(d2), fixing one diameter (D2) and tuning the other (D1) allows for full modulation of CoP–CrP amplitudes (diamond curves), but the CrP and CoP phases will change around π/2 over this modulation. For our purpose, we find another trajectory that yields constant phase in the full amplitude modulation, which we denote as phase iso-curves. The phase iso-curves D1 = f(D2) are fitted using a rational law

Meta-atom design. (a) Unit cell of the metasurface: λ = 1.55 μm, substrate SiO2 (n = 1.444), elliptical a-Si meta-atoms (nSi = 3.505), height h = 800 nm, array pitch P = 650 nm. Bidimensional library of elliptical meta-atoms: CoP phase (b1) and amplitude (b2), CrP phase (c1) and amplitude (c2). The cross curve depicts the phase iso-curves of ξ ≈ − 1.65 rad, and the diamond line represents a slice with fixed D2 = 210 nm and free D1. The corresponding phases and intensities for different trajectories in the parametric space are plotted in (d1) and (d2) respectively as a function of an arbitrary parametrization variable s (D1 = D1(s), D2 = D2(s)), where the blue colour represents CrP waves and the red colour represents CoP components.
Following this initial simulation, now we proceed to obtain a definitive meta-atom library for polarization manipulation at the phase iso-curves. The sweep of all the possible diameters and rotation angles (measured counter-clockwise) is shown in Figure 3: the complex amplitudes of the CoP and CrP waves in the parameter space are plotted in (a) and (b) respectively. As expected, the diameter variation yields continuous amplitude modulation with constant phase in both CoP and CrP waves, and the rotation angle provides full phase modulation exclusively in the CrP wave. A slice plot 3(c) for θ = 0 shows the CoP/CrP intensity modulation as a function of D1, keeping the total transmittance around 97 % all over the process. The inset shows the meta-atoms transverse shape within this modulation: higher aspect ratio D2/D1 increases the CrP amplitude and carries an additional dynamic phase, which is compensated by a simultaneous reduction of the meta-atoms size along the two principal axes (SI Section S2). In 3(d) we depict an example of a Gaussian intensity profile in the CoP component, featuring a flat wavefront due to the meta-atoms’ geometry.

Polarization manipulation at the phase iso-curves: complex amplitudes of the co-polarized (a) and cross-polarized (b) waves represented with a hue-lightness colormap as a function of the first diameter D1 and the rotation angle θ, the second diameter is given by the phase iso-curve equation
One more challenge appears when trying to shape propagation-invariant skyrmions with this MS design. We can see from Figure 3(c) that the total transmittance of the MS is constant over all the CrP intensity modulation. Thus, whatever is the polarization texture that we generate, the total intensity will be approximately unitary
satisfying the unitarity condition. The intensity profiles at y = 0 for ψ1( r ) = LG2,0 and ψ1( r ) = LG0,0 is depicted in Figure 4(a), showing the profiles that the MS would generate when illuminated by a flat-top. The conversion efficiency (from CoP to CrP) spatially varies from 0 % at the MS center to 100 % at the MS edge. Any experimental deviations of these theoretical values will have a detrimental effect on the measured skyrmion number. Of course, the profiles in Figure 4(a) are not eigenmodes of free-space, but they can be approximately converted into them by simply illuminating the MS with a Gaussian beam ψ0( r ) = LG0,0( r , w0) of appropriate size w0 [58]. In order to avoid undesired scattering, the intensity of the input beam must decay well-before the edges of the MS, for which we choose the input beam size at around w ∼ DMS/4, with DMS the diameter of the MS. The resulting vector beam follows the expression
whose intensity profile is plotted in 4(b) again for y = 0, showing great resemblance to the free-space LG eigenmodes. To quantitatively confirm the validity of this approach and considering a collimated incident profile ψ0(
r
), we must find what is the mode decomposition of the resulting beam. The second order moment of the intensity

Target and output profiles at the MS: (a) target (normalized) intensity profiles for the CoP and CrP components, the inset shows the input Gaussian illumination over the MS, with
To prove the propagation-invariant topology of the output fields, we compute the skyrmion number (2) in propagation for different MS design strategies, the results of which are shown in Figure 4(d). When both CoP and CrP waves are modulated at dynamic phase iso-curves the generated skyrmions feature nearly constant NSK (black curve). In contrast, we can compare it with the case where the dynamic phase has not been compensated in the design, as happens for the diamond curves in Figure 2. For instance, if ξ( r ) appears in the CoP wave but it is compensated in the CrP wave through the geometric phase, NSK is high at the near field, but it decays with distance due to the non-parabolic converging wavefront in the CoP wave (blue curve). With the same meta-atom design, one could also choose not to compensate the dynamic phase in either CoP or CrP waves, but NSK will also not be maintained in propagation (green curve). Finally, if we keep CoP and CrP amplitudes constant, only introducing a vortex phase in the CrP wave (like a Q-plate with Δϕ = π/2), the Skyrmion texture will only appear in the far-field (red curve) [51] once the components of high radial index have diffracted, but will not present skyrmion topology in the near-field. Although our results have been obtained for a topological charge l = 2, the same protocol can be applied to achieve higher-order Stokes skyrmions with propagation-invariant topology. In addition, as the generated fields have very high free-space modal purity, they will also preserve their topology at any propagation plane after passing through paraxial optical elements such as lenses.
3 Sample fabrication and experimental characterization
We present a first preliminiary proof-of-concept experimental realisation of our approach. First, a layer of 800-nm aSi was deposited on a quartz substrate via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (Oxford PlasmaPro100). PMMA A4 resist was then spin-coated at 3,000 rpm for 1 min, followed by soft baking at 180 °C for 3 min on a hotplate. The designed MS pattern was defined using a 100 kV EBL system (Raith EBPG). After development, a 30-nm Chromium mask layer was deposited onto the sample in an E-beam evaporation chamber (Intlvac Nanochrome II) under 5 · 10−6 Torr. Excess PMMA and Cr were removed by immersing the sample in acetone and rinsing it in IPA. The mask pattern was then transferred to the a-Si layer by ICP-RIE (Oxford PlasmaLab) dry etching, using a mixture of SF6 and C4F8 gases for the reactive and physical etch processes, respectively. The SEM images of the fabricated MSs for different magnifications and view angles are shown in Figure 5(b). Once the samples are fabricated, we prepare an imaging setup for polarization characterization as shown in 5(a). A fibre-coupled 1,550 nm Gaussian beam is expanded and collimated with a telescope. We prepare the input circular polarization impinging on the MS by a linear polarizer at 0° and quarter-wave plate at 45°. Then, the beam is focused onto a spot of FWHM ∼60 μm at the MS plane using a lens. The output beam is imaged using a telescope and captured by a NIR CMOS detector (NINOX 640 II). We perform standard Stokes polarimetry, in which the polarization features are retrieved from six intensity measurements in different polarization basis (H,V,D,A,L,R)

Experimental results. (a) Experimental setup for polarization characterization of Stokes skyrmions. LP: linear polarizer, QWP: quarter-wave plate, FL: focusing lens, MS: metasurface. (b) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the fabricated MS for top and tilted views. (c) Experimentally measured Stokes texture (top row) for three different diffraction distances measured from the image plane of the telescope (z3 = 0 mm, z2 = 0.12 mm, z1 = 0.72 mm) with the calculated skyrmion number. The lower rows show the corresponding intensity profile of the CrP and CoP waves.
Finally, in 5(c) we depict the reconstructed skyrmion textures (top row) at three different propagation distances with their corresponding skyrmion numbers. The distances (z3 = 0 mm, z2 = 0.12 mm, z1 = 0.72 mm) are measured respect to the image plane of the telescope. The CrP and CoP intensity profiles are also shown in the lower rows, whose diffraction evolution mainly features a spatial stretching without significant shape changes, up to experimental and fabrication errors. As a corollary, the skyrmion topology remains preserved upon propagation in free-space, maintaining a stable skyrmion number across the measured diffraction distances. We remark that this is a consequence of achieving a constant dynamic phase along the MS plane, which is confirmed by interferometric measurements shown in Figure S1 of SI. Due to the small size of the MS (D ∼200 μm) preparing a collimated illumination at the MS plane constitutes experimental challenges, which complicates the characterization of the output fields within their Rayleigh range as was theoretically done in 4(d). In our experiments due to non-ideal collimation the input beam included a focusing wavefront causing the generated skyrmions to converge. This will be improved by increasing the MS size, and a more precise characterization of the topological features will be carried out in future works.
4 Conclusions
In summary, we have designed a dielectric MS based on structural birefringence and geometric phase which achieves arbitrary CoP to CrP conversion without carrying any additional dynamic phase. This design empowered by the modulation of light at dynamic phase iso-curves facilitates the generation of scalar modes that align closely with free-space eigenmodes, avoiding additional wavefronts typically associated with the dynamic phase. We have numerically and experimentally verified that the resulting light fields feature a nearly invariant evolution during propagation, undergoing only a spatial stretching in their diffraction profiles and guaranteeing the stability of the skyrmion topology across propagation distances. Our findings show significant advancements in the field, presenting a compact platform for generating topological structured light with stable topological features, which may open new pathways for applications in optical information transfer and other technologies reliant on topological structured light.
Funding source: Singapore Ministry of Education
Award Identifier / Grant number: AcRF Tier 1 RG157/23
Award Identifier / Grant number: AcRF Tier 1 RT11/23
Funding source: Australian Research Council
Award Identifier / Grant number: DE220101085
Award Identifier / Grant number: DP220102152
Funding source: Nanyang Technological University
Award Identifier / Grant number: INCF-2024-007
Award Identifier / Grant number: Nanyang Technological University Start Up Grant
-
Research funding: YS and SAM both acknowledge Imperial-Nanyang Technological University Collaboration Fund (INCF-2024-007), YS acknowledges Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) AcRF Tier 1 grant (RG157/23), MoE AcRF Tier 1 Thematic grant (RT11/23), and Nanyang Assistant Professorship Start Up Grant. HR acknowledges funding support from the Australian Research Council (DE220101085, DP220102152). SAM acknowledges funding support from the Australian Research Council (DP220102152) and the Lee Lucas Chair in Physics. This work was performed in part at the Melbourne Centre for Nanofabrication (MCN) in the Victorian Node of the Australian National Fabrication Facility (ANFF).
-
Author contributions: NMC conceived the idea and carried out the numerical design. CL and HY performed fabrication and SEM imaging of the samples. ZX and HY prepared the experimental setup and carried out the MS characterization with CL, HR, NMC, YS and SAM who supervised the experiments. NMC wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors participated in the analysis of the results and discussions. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed all the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
-
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflicts of interest. Stefan A. Maier is an Editor of the Nanophotonics journal and was not involved in the review and decision-making process of this article.
-
Data availability: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors, upon reasonable request.
References
[1] Y. Shen, Q. Zhang, P. Shi, L. Du, X. Yuan, and A. V. Zayats, “Optical skyrmions and other topological quasiparticles of light,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 15, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-023-01325-7.Suche in Google Scholar
[2] A. Forbes, M. De Oliveira, and M. R. Dennis, “Structured light,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 253, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-021-00780-4.Suche in Google Scholar
[3] C. He, Y. Shen, and A. Forbes, “Towards higher-dimensional structured light,” Light: Sci. Appl., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 205, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-00897-3.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[4] A. M. Beckley, T. G. Brown, and M. A. Alonso, “Full poincaré beams,” Opt. Express, vol. 18, no. 10, p. 10777, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.18.010777.Suche in Google Scholar
[5] Z. Ye, et al.., “Theory of paraxial optical skyrmions,” Proc. Royal Society A, vol. 480, no. 2297, p. 20240109, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2024.0109.Suche in Google Scholar
[6] S. Gao, F. C. Speirits, F. Castellucci, S. Franke-Arnold, S. M. Barnett, and J. B. Götte, “Paraxial skyrmionic beams,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 102, no. 5, p. 053513, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.102.053513.Suche in Google Scholar
[7] Y. Shen, “Topological bimeronic beams,” Opt. Lett., vol. 46, no. 15, p. 3737, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.431122.Suche in Google Scholar
[8] H. Wang and S. Fan, “Photonic spin hopfions and monopole loops,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 131, no. 26, p. 263801, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.131.263801.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Y. Dai, et al.., “Plasmonic topological quasiparticle on the nanometre and femtosecond scales,” Nature, vol. 588, no. 7893, p. 616, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3030-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] L. Du, A. Yang, A. V. Zayats, and X. Yuan, “Deep-subwavelength features of photonic skyrmions in a confined electromagnetic field with orbital angular momentum,” Nat. Phys., vol. 15, no. 7, p. 650, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0487-7.Suche in Google Scholar
[11] R. Gutiérrez-Cuevas and E. Pisanty, “Optical polarization skyrmionic fields in free space,” J. Opt., vol. 23, no. 2, p. 024004, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/abe8b2.Suche in Google Scholar
[12] C. Liu, S. Zhang, S. A. Maier, and H. Ren, “Disorder-induced topological state transition in the optical skyrmion family,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 129, no. 26, p. 267401, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.129.267401.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] Y. Zeng, Y. Yu, X. Shen, J. Chen, and Q. Zhan, “Tightly focused optical skyrmions and merons formed by electric-field vectors with prescribed characteristics,” Nanophotonics, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 251, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0741.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[14] S. Tsesses, E. Ostrovsky, K. Cohen, B. Gjonaj, N. Lindner, and G. Bartal, “Optical skyrmion lattice in evanescent electromagnetic fields,” Science, vol. 361, no. 6406, p. 993, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau0227.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] T. J. Davis, D. Janoschka, P. Dreher, B. Frank, F. J. Meyer zu Heringdorf, and H. Giessen, “Ultrafast vector imaging of plasmonic skyrmion dynamics with deep subwavelength resolution,” Science, vol. 368, no. 6489, p. eaba6415, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6415.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[16] J. Schwab, et al.., “Plasmonic twistronics: discovery of plasmonic skyrmion bags,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03032, 2024.Suche in Google Scholar
[17] S. Wang, et al.., “Topological structures of energy flow: poynting vector skyrmions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 133, no. 7, p. 073802, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.133.073802.Suche in Google Scholar
[18] Y. Shen, E. C. Martínez, and C. Rosales-Guzmán, “Generation of optical skyrmions with tunable topological textures,” ACS Photonics, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 296, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01703.Suche in Google Scholar
[19] D. Sugic, et al.., “Particle-like topologies in light,” Nat. commun., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 6785, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26171-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[20] Y. Shen, B. Yu, H. Wu, C. Li, Z. Zhu, and A. V. Zayats, “Topological transformation and free-space transport of photonic hopfions,” Adv. Photonics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 015001, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.ap.5.1.015001.Suche in Google Scholar
[21] X.-B. Hu and C. Rosales-Guzmán, “Generation and characterization of complex vector modes with digital micromirror devices: a tutorial,” J. Opt., vol. 24, no. 3, p. 034001, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/ac4671.Suche in Google Scholar
[22] P. Genevet, F. Capasso, F. Aieta, M. Khorasaninejad, and R. Devlin, “Recent advances in planar optics: from plasmonic to dielectric metasurfaces,” Optica, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 139, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.4.000139.Suche in Google Scholar
[23] N. Yu and F. Capasso, “Flat optics with designer metasurfaces,” Nat. Mater., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 139, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3839.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] N. Yu and P. Genevet, “Flat optics: controlling wavefronts with optical antenna metasurfaces,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., vol. 19, no. 3, p. 4700423, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstqe.2013.2241399.Suche in Google Scholar
[25] M. Khorasaninejad and F. Capasso, “Metalenses: versatile multifunctional photonic components,” Science, vol. 358, no. 6367, p. eaam8100, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8100.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] S. A. Schulz, et al.., “Roadmap on photonic metasurfaces,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 124, no. 26, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0204694.Suche in Google Scholar
[27] A. I. Kuznetsov, et al.., “Roadmap for optical metasurfaces,” ACS photonics, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 816, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.3c00457.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[28] M. Ossiander, et al.., “Extreme ultraviolet metalens by vacuum guiding,” Science, vol. 380, no. 6640, pp. 59–63, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg6881.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[29] H. Kang, H. Kim, K. Kim, and J. Rho, “Printable spin-multiplexed metasurfaces for ultraviolet holographic displays,” ACS Nano, vol. 18, no. 32, p. 21504, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c06280.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[30] M. Khorasaninejad, W. T. Chen, R. C. Devlin, J. Oh, A. Y. Zhu, and F. Capasso, “Metalenses at visible wavelengths: diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging,” Science, vol. 352, no. 6290, p. 1190, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6644.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[31] F. Aieta, M. A. Kats, P. Genevet, and F. Capasso, “Multiwavelength achromatic metasurfaces by dispersive phase compensation,” Science, vol. 347, no. 6228, p. 1342, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa2494.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[32] R. Pestourie, C. Pérez-Arancibia, Z. Lin, W. Shin, F. Capasso, and S. G. Johnson, “Inverse design of large-area metasurfaces,” Opt. Express, vol. 26, no. 26, p. 33732, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.26.033732.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[33] A. Komar, et al.., “Dynamic beam switching by liquid crystal tunable dielectric metasurfaces,” Acs Photonics, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 1742, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01343.Suche in Google Scholar
[34] N. Yu, et al.., “Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction,” science, vol. 334, no. 6054, p. 333, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210713.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[35] J. Balthasar Mueller, N. A. Rubin, R. C. Devlin, B. Groever, and F. Capasso, “Metasurface polarization optics: independent phase control of arbitrary orthogonal states of polarization,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 118, no. 11, p. 113901, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.118.113901.Suche in Google Scholar
[36] G. Zheng, H. Mühlenbernd, M. Kenney, G. Li, T. Zentgraf, and S. Zhang, “Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 10, no. 4, p. 308, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[37] W. Song, et al.., “Large-scale huygens’ metasurfaces for holographic 3d near-eye displays,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 15, no. 9, p. 2000538, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202000538.Suche in Google Scholar
[38] A. H. Dorrah, N. A. Rubin, A. Zaidi, M. Tamagnone, and F. Capasso, “Metasurface optics for on-demand polarization transformations along the optical path,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 287, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-00750-2.Suche in Google Scholar
[39] R. C. Devlin, A. Ambrosio, N. A. Rubin, J. B. Mueller, and F. Capasso, “Arbitrary spin-to–orbital angular momentum conversion of light,” Science, vol. 358, no. 6365, p. 896, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao5392.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[40] R. C. Devlin, et al.., “Spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in dielectric metasurfaces,” Opt. Express, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 377, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.25.000377.Suche in Google Scholar
[41] S. W. D. Lim, J.-S. Park, M. L. Meretska, A. H. Dorrah, and F. Capasso, “Engineering phase and polarization singularity sheets,” Nat. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 4190, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24493-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[42] J. B. Mueller, K. Leosson, and F. Capasso, “Ultracompact metasurface in-line polarimeter,” Optica, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 42, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.3.000042.Suche in Google Scholar
[43] E. Arbabi, S. M. Kamali, A. Arbabi, and A. Faraon, “Full-Stokes imaging polarimetry using dielectric metasurfaces,” Acs Photonics, vol. 5, no. 8, p. 3132, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00362.Suche in Google Scholar
[44] N. A. Rubin, G. D’Aversa, P. Chevalier, Z. Shi, W. T. Chen, and F. Capasso, “Matrix fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera,” Science, vol. 365, no. 6448, p. eaax1839, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1839.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[45] Z. Li, W. Liu, Y. Zhang, H. Cheng, S. Zhang, and S. Chen, “Optical polarization manipulations with anisotropic nanostructures,” PhotoniX, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 30, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43074-024-00143-6.Suche in Google Scholar
[46] Y. Bao, J. Ni, and C.-W. Qiu, “A minimalist single-layer metasurface for arbitrary and full control of vector vortex beams,” Adv. Mater., vol. 32, no. 6, p. 1905659, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201905659.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[47] F. Yue, D. Wen, J. Xin, B. D. Gerardot, J. Li, and X. Chen, “Vector vortex beam generation with a single plasmonic metasurface,” ACS photonics, vol. 3, no. 9, p. 1558, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00392.Suche in Google Scholar
[48] C. Li, et al.., “Metafiber transforming arbitrarily structured light,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 7222, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43068-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[49] N. Mata-Cervera, D. K. Sharma, R. Maruthiyodan Veetil, T. W. Mass, M. A. Porras, and R. Paniagua-Dominguez, “Observation of exploding vortex beams generated by amplitude and phase all-dielectric metasurfaces,” ACS Photonics, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2713–2721, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.4c00556.Suche in Google Scholar
[50] T. Li, et al.., “Realization of spinful metaphotonic Stokes skyrmions,” J. Opt., vol. 26, no. 9, p. 09LT01, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/ad699e.Suche in Google Scholar
[51] T. He, et al.., “Optical skyrmions from metafibers with subwavelength features,” Nat. Commun., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54207-z.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[52] V. Hakobyan, Y. Shen, and E. Brasselet, “Unitary spin-orbit optical-skyrmionic wave plates,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 22, no. 5, p. 054038, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.22.054038.Suche in Google Scholar
[53] Y. Shen, et al.., “Topologically controlled multiskyrmions in photonic gradient-index lenses,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 21, no. 2, p. 024025, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.21.024025.Suche in Google Scholar
[54] V. Hakobyan, et al.., “Single-stage spin-orbit laguerre-Gaussian modal beam shaping from silica optics,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 21, no. 6, p. 064003, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.21.064003.Suche in Google Scholar
[55] X. Song, et al.., “Selective diffraction with complex amplitude modulation by dielectric metasurfaces,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 6, no. 4, p. 1701181, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201701181.Suche in Google Scholar
[56] H. Ren, X. Fang, J. Jang, J. Bürger, J. Rho, and S. A. Maier, “Complex-amplitude metasurface-based orbital angular momentum holography in momentum space,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 15, no. 11, p. 948, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0768-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[57] W. Jin, W. Li, M. Orenstein, and S. Fan, “Inverse design of lightweight broadband reflector for relativistic lightsail propulsion,” ACS Photonics, vol. 7, no. 9, p. 2350, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00768.Suche in Google Scholar
[58] M. Rafayelyan and E. Brasselet, “Laguerre–Gaussian modal q-plates,” Opt. Lett., vol. 42, no. 10, p. 1966, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.42.001966.Suche in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2024-0736).
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.