Home Random bit generation based on a self-chaotic microlaser with enhanced chaotic bandwidth
Article Open Access

Random bit generation based on a self-chaotic microlaser with enhanced chaotic bandwidth

  • Jian-Cheng Li ORCID logo , Jin-Long Xiao , Yue-De Yang , You-Ling Chen and Yong-Zhen Huang ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 13, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Chaotic semiconductor lasers have been widely investigated for high-speed random bit generation, which is applied for the generation of cryptographic keys for classical and quantum cryptography systems. Here, we propose and demonstrate a self-chaotic microlaser with enhanced chaotic bandwidth for high-speed random bit generation. By designing tri-mode interaction in a deformed square microcavity laser, we realize a self-chaotic laser caused by two-mode internal interaction, and achieve an enhanced chaotic standard bandwidth due to the photon–photon resonance effect by introducing the third mode. Moreover, 500 Gb/s random bit generation is realized and the randomness is verified by the NIST SP 800-22 statistics test. Our demonstration promises the applications of microlasers in secure communication, chaos radar, and optical reservoir computing, and also provides a platform for the investigations of multimode nonlinear laser dynamics.

1 Introduction

Physical random bits play an important role in cryptography systems, information security, stochastic modeling, and Monte Carlo simulation [15]. Physical random bit generation (RBG) was achieved with low generation rates (at Mb/s level) based on thermal noise [6] and sampling phase jitter [7] in specific circuits, stochastic threshold switching in memristors [8], and quantum vacuum state fluctuations [9]. To realize high-speed RBG, chaotic semiconductor lasers as favorable physical entropy sources have been widely investigated owing to their large bandwidth and intensive randomness [1015]. However, semiconductor lasers, governed by the two parameters of mode intensity and carrier inversion, usually need external perturbations to generate specific nonlinear dynamic states, such as periodic oscillations and chaos [16]. Consequently, chaotic semiconductor lasers were investigated under external optical feedback [10, 11, 17], [18], [19], [20] and optical injection [15, 21, 22]. To simplify the system complexity, integrated chaos lasers were developed with a passive feedback cavity [13, 23], [24], [25], optoelectronic feedback [26], or mutual injection lasers [27, 28]. However, chaotic semiconductor lasers under delayed optical feedback or mutual coupling have obvious correlation peaks of the time delay signature [10, 14], which reduces the randomness and security in random number generation. Furthermore, deterministic polarization chaos, caused by nonlinear mode competition including carrier spin relaxation, was realized for a free-running quantum dot vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser [29]. Recently, parallel ultrafast RBG was demonstrated in a broad area semiconductor laser with curved facets under large-current pulse operation, using spatiotemporal interference of many lasing modes with unpredictable spontaneous noise [30]. A real-time physical RBG with all-optical quantization was proposed and realized using a schematic of three stages [31]. Firstly, white chaotic signal was obtained by optical heterodyne using two external-cavity chaotic lasers, then the chaotic signal was applied to modulate the output of a mode-lock laser, and finally the optical spectrum of modulated output was broadened in a highly nonlinear fiber with a sliced spectrum as quantizing chaotic optical pulse. In addition, low-correlation and wideband parallel chaotic signals were demonstrated using opto-electronically coupled a chaotic external-cavity semiconductor laser and a continuous-wave laser, with enhanced chaotic bandwidth and suppressed time-delayed signature of the external cavity [32]. A self-chaotic hexagonal microcavity laser was verified using two-mode internal interaction and 10 Gb/s RBG was obtained from the chaotic laser output [33], with the chaotic bandwidth limited by the laser relaxation oscillation frequency. Polarization-resolved nonlinear dynamics were studied for a broad area vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser with multiple transverse modes [34]. Furthermore, 400 Gb/s RBG was demonstrated for a self-chaotic deformed square microlaser even with the chaotic signal of double-peak [35].

In this paper, we propose and demonstrate a tri-mode self-chaotic square microlaser with an enhanced chaotic bandwidth by employing the photon–photon resonance effect. By designing a deformed square microcavity with circular sides, we can enhance the mode quality factor (Q-factor) and engineer the mode frequency interval [36]. Since passive mode Q-factors are larger than 104 for the fundamental (0th), first (1st) and second-order (2nd) transverse modes, they can all approach the threshold condition for an AlGaInAs/InP deformed square microlaser, with a Q-factor determined by absorption loss much lower than 104. As shown in Figure 1(a), the self-chaotic microlaser is realized by the mode interaction between the 0th and 1st order transverse modes with a mode interval around relaxation oscillation frequency [33], and then the chaotic bandwidth is enhanced due to photon–photon resonance caused by mode beating with the adjacent 2nd order transverse mode with a larger mode spacing. The mode intensity patterns of the 0th and 1st transverse modes are shown in the insets of Figure 1(c), their field distributions are in-phase and anti-phase in half a region, respectively, which is clearer than those in the deformed hexagonal microcavity [33]. The enhancement and cancellation of mode beating intensities result in strong differences of carrier consumption in the in-phase and anti-phase regions, which transfer at the mode beating frequency. As the beating frequency approaches the relaxation oscillation frequency, the mode beating intensity will cause strong carrier oscillation and the appearance of mode side peaks similar to that under external modulation, which results in strong internal mode interaction and self-chaos [33]. The further mode beating with the 2nd order transverse mode will induce additional high-frequency peaks in the response curve as shown in Figure 1(a), i.e., the chaotic bandwidth enhanced by the photon–photon resonance effect for directly modulated lasers [37]. Based on the novel method, we demonstrate a tri-mode self-chaos deformed square microcavity laser with 33.9 GHz chaos bandwidth, and realize 500 Gb/s RBG from the chaotic microlaser output.

Figure 1: 
Schematic diagram and simulation design for bandwidth-enhanced self-chaotic microlaser. (a) Schematic diagram of self-chaos due to two-mode interaction and chaotic bandwidth enhanced by photon–photon resonance of the mode beating with the third mode. Carrier oscillation at the beating frequency of the 0th and 1st transverse modes λ
0 and λ
1 causes side peaks for the lasing modes, which work as the internal optical injection terms and cause self-chaos. The chaotic bandwidth is extended to the high-frequency region due to the photon–photon resonance with the 2nd transverse mode λ
2. (b) Three-dimensional schematic diagram and two-dimensional top-view of a circular-sided square microcavity laser with a central hole and a ring electrode corresponding to a refractive index step Δn. (c) Mode Q-factor versus mode wavelength. Insets are mode intensity distributions of the 0th, 1st and 2nd transverse modes. (d) Transverse mode intervals Δf
01 and Δf
12 and (e) degenerated mode intervals Δf
00 and Δf
11 versus Δn.
Figure 1:

Schematic diagram and simulation design for bandwidth-enhanced self-chaotic microlaser. (a) Schematic diagram of self-chaos due to two-mode interaction and chaotic bandwidth enhanced by photon–photon resonance of the mode beating with the third mode. Carrier oscillation at the beating frequency of the 0th and 1st transverse modes λ 0 and λ 1 causes side peaks for the lasing modes, which work as the internal optical injection terms and cause self-chaos. The chaotic bandwidth is extended to the high-frequency region due to the photon–photon resonance with the 2nd transverse mode λ 2. (b) Three-dimensional schematic diagram and two-dimensional top-view of a circular-sided square microcavity laser with a central hole and a ring electrode corresponding to a refractive index step Δn. (c) Mode Q-factor versus mode wavelength. Insets are mode intensity distributions of the 0th, 1st and 2nd transverse modes. (d) Transverse mode intervals Δf 01 and Δf 12 and (e) degenerated mode intervals Δf 00 and Δf 11 versus Δn.

2 Methods

A three-dimensional schematic diagram and two-dimensional top-view of the deformed square microcavity laser are shown in Figure 1(b), where a central hole is applied to further control the transverse mode number. The transverse electric (TE) mode characteristics are numerically investigated using a two-dimensional finite element method, for a deformed square with the flat-side length a = 20 µm, circular-side deformation parameter δ = 2.17 µm, the width of output waveguide d = 1.5 µm, the shift of the output waveguide h = 4 2  μm, and the radius of the central hole R in = 5.5 µm (see Section 1 of the Supplementary Material for parameters optimization details). Two near-degenerate modes with nearly the same magnitude of Q-factors and mode field patterns are obtained for each transverse mode. We give the results for the near-degenerate mode with a higher Q-factor in the following. As shown in Figure 1(c), the simulated mode Q-factors are 4.1 × 105, 6.9 × 104, and 1.7 × 104 for the 0th, 1st and 2nd order transverse modes, respectively, with mode wavelengths of 1550.093, 1550.160, and 1550.265 nm. The corresponding squared magnetic field distributions are shown in the insets of Figure 1(c). In addition, a ring p-electrode with a width of 4 µm is designed for fine adjustment of the mode frequency interval, with a refractive index step ∆n to simply account for carrier and temperature distributions inside the resonator [38]. The calculated mode frequency intervals Δf 01 = f 0thf 1st and Δf 12 = f 1stf 2nd and near-degenerate mode intervals Δf 00 and Δf 11 versus Δn are plotted in Figure 1(d) and (e), respectively. The magnitude of Δf 01 around 10 GHz is suitable for realizing a chaotic microlaser caused by internal mode interaction [33]. In the range 0.003 < Δn < 0.008, complex mode coupling results in a large splitting for Δf 11.

According to the designed microcavity parameters, circular-sided square microcavity lasers were realized using an AlGaInAs/InP compressively-strained multiple quantum-well laser wafer with the same manufacturing process as in Ref. [33]. The deformed square microlasers show great repeatability of self-chaotic operation, especially comparing with the deformed hexagon microlasers [33].

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Self-chaos generation

The microlasers were tested at a heat sink temperature of 289 K using the experimental setup shown in Figure 2(a). The output signal of the laser is coupled into a tapered single-mode fiber and an optical isolator (ISO) is utilized to avoid optical feedback from other system components. The laser output is analyzed by an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA, YOKOGAWA, AQ6370D, 0.02 nm resolution), amplified and filtered using an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EFDA) and a tunable optical band-pass filter (OBPF) before detecting by a high-speed photodetector (PD, Finisar XPDV2120R, 50 GHz bandwidth). A bias-T (SHF BT45R, 20 kHz-45 GHz) is inserted into the path to separate AC and DC components of the PD converted electrical signal. Then, the AC component is sent to an electrical spectrum analyzer (ESA, ROHDE&SCHWARZ FSW50) and a real-time oscilloscope (OSC, Tektronix DPO77002SX, 33 GHz bandwidth, 100 GSa/s, 8-bit vertical resolution) for radio-frequency spectrum analysis and time series capture, respectively. The output power coupled into a tapered single-mode fiber (SMF) and the applied voltage versus continuous-wave injection current are plotted in Figure 2(b), where the insets are the scanning electron microscope image of an etched microcavity and the lasing spectra from 4 to 40 mA. A threshold current of 4 mA is estimated based on lasing spectra. Nonlinear dynamics of the laser output were investigated, including lasing spectra, radio-frequency (RF) spectra, and time domain signal. As shown in Figure 2(c), three peaks at 1539.384, 1539.560, and 1539.876 nm are observed at an injection current of 5.6 mA, with mode frequency intervals of 22 and 39.5 GHz. Comparing the simulated results in Figure 1(c), these peaks are identified as the 0th, 1st, and 2nd transverse modes, respectively. In addition, we can expect that the transverse mode order can be identified by measuring the mode pattern for the optical pumped microcavity as in [39]. The corresponding RF spectrum is shown in Figure 2(d), which almost coincident with noise floor at 5.6 mA. By increasing the current to 6.6 mA, side peaks with an interval of ∼0.04 nm (∼5 GHz) are observed for the main lasing peaks, which may be attributed to the mode beating between the near-degenerate modes of the 1st transverse mode as indicated by the simulated results in Figure 1(e). A sharp harmonic peak at 5 GHz appears in the corresponding RF spectrum in Figure 2(d) at 6.6 mA. At 8.8 mA, a broadened lasing spectrum appears due to strong mode interaction, similar as the chaotic lasing spectrum in Ref. [33], which is mainly caused by the mode interaction between the 0th and 1st modes. The chaotic standard bandwidth, which covers 80 % of the total RF power [40], is calculated to be 9.6 GHz at 8.8 mA.

Figure 2: 
Self-chaos generation. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup for the test of nonlinear dynamic states. ISO, isolator; OSA, optical spectrum analyzer; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; OBPF, optical bandpass filter; PD, photodetector; ESA, electrical spectrum analyzer; OSC, real-time oscilloscope. (b) Laser power and applied voltage versus injected current. Insets: SEM image of a deformed square microcavity and lasing spectra map with respect to current. (c) Lasing spectra and (d) corresponding electric power spectra of steady, periodic, and chaotic states at 5.6, 6.6 and 8.8 mA, respectively.
Figure 2:

Self-chaos generation. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup for the test of nonlinear dynamic states. ISO, isolator; OSA, optical spectrum analyzer; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; OBPF, optical bandpass filter; PD, photodetector; ESA, electrical spectrum analyzer; OSC, real-time oscilloscope. (b) Laser power and applied voltage versus injected current. Insets: SEM image of a deformed square microcavity and lasing spectra map with respect to current. (c) Lasing spectra and (d) corresponding electric power spectra of steady, periodic, and chaotic states at 5.6, 6.6 and 8.8 mA, respectively.

3.2 Chaotic bandwidth enhancement

The enhancement of chaotic bandwidth due to photon–photon resonance is demonstrated in Figure 3. Here, the main lasing modes jump to around 1550.5 nm around 18 mA due to the redshift of gain spectrum caused by the current heating effect. As shown in Figure 3(a) and (b), a long-wavelength mode assigned as the 2nd mode increases much faster than other lasing peaks with the current and becomes the main lasing mode at 20 mA, and the high frequency peaks at around 21 and 32 GHz of the RF spectra are greatly enhanced. The calculated chaos standard bandwidths are 13.7, 28.2, and 33.9 GHz at 16, 18, and 20 mA, respectively. To clearly verify the effect of photon–photon resonance, we measured RF spectra for filtered optical spectra as shown in Figure 3(c) and (d). The RF spectra have small chaos standard bandwidths of 13.2 GHz and 8.1 GHz for the filtered optical spectra with the 0th plus 1st modes (0th + 1st) and 2nd mode, respectively. In Figure 3(c), the intervals between the 2nd mode peak and three evident peaks of the wide chaotic spectra are 0.184, 0.272, and 0.320 nm, which contribute to three beating peaks at 22.8, 33.3, and 39.5 GHz for the RF spectrum in Figure 3(d). These results imply the origin of bandwidth enhancement due to mode beating with the 2nd mode. The AC waveform of the chaotic laser output at 20 mA is plotted in Figure 3(e), and the calculated autocorrelation function (ACF) is shown in Figure 3(f), with a half width at half maximum of 0.011 ns. The ACF has some minor peaks within 0.5 ns, but without the time-delayed correlation peak observed in optical feedback chaotic lasers [41]. The modified Grassberger–Procaccia (G-P) algorithm is applied to quantify the complexity of the chaos signal [42, 43], and a correlation dimension of 11.6 is obtained (see Section 2 of the Supplementary Material for a detailed calculation), which is nearly triple that in Ref. [33].

Figure 3: 
Chaotic bandwidth enhancement. (a) Lasing spectra and (b) corresponding RF spectra at 16, 18, and 20 mA. (c) Filtered lasing spectra, the arrows show different peak intervals, and (d) corresponding RF spectra at 20 mA. (e) Irregular temporal waveform and (f) corresponding autocorrelation function for the chaotic output at 20 mA. The inset in (f) represents the entire ACF curve for 1 μs.
Figure 3:

Chaotic bandwidth enhancement. (a) Lasing spectra and (b) corresponding RF spectra at 16, 18, and 20 mA. (c) Filtered lasing spectra, the arrows show different peak intervals, and (d) corresponding RF spectra at 20 mA. (e) Irregular temporal waveform and (f) corresponding autocorrelation function for the chaotic output at 20 mA. The inset in (f) represents the entire ACF curve for 1 μs.

3.3 Random bit generation

Furthermore, the bandwidth-enhanced self-chaotic microlaser was utilized to generate physical random numbers. The AC waveform signals at 20 mA are collected with a 100 GSa/s sampling rate, and the intensity histogram distribution of the 500 µs long raw data stream is illustrated in Figure 4(a). The intensity distribution is asymmetric with an initial skewness of 0.40, which is a typical feature of a chaotic semiconductor laser. The asymmetric distribution can result in bias in the generated random sequence, and we adopted extra post-processing methods, including delay-subtracting and least significant bits (LSBs) extraction, for RBG [11, 30]. Specifically, we subtract the original signal from its delayed signal to attain a symmetric distribution. Considering the very low correlation coefficient at 0.5 ns in Figure 3(f), we select a delay time of 0.5 ns and plot the histogram distribution of the differential data in Figure 4(b). The symmetry of the differential signal is significantly improved with a skewness coefficient of 0.02. Then, the differential intensity is digitalized into 8-bit binary numbers, and the LSBs method is adopted to destroy the residual correlations of adjacent bits and improve the uniformity of the bit distributions. By retaining five LSBs, we can obtain a nearly uniform probability distribution, as shown in Figure 4(c). At the same time, the absolute autocorrelation coefficient of the bit stream is less than 10−3 and remains at the background level for any bit stream length in Figure 4(d), indicating the removal of correlation between successive bits.

Figure 4: 
Histogram distribution for (a) raw signal intensity and (b) differential intensity after delay-subtracting post-processing. (c) Probability distribution with 5-LSBs extraction, and (d) corresponding ACF curve of the bit stream.
Figure 4:

Histogram distribution for (a) raw signal intensity and (b) differential intensity after delay-subtracting post-processing. (c) Probability distribution with 5-LSBs extraction, and (d) corresponding ACF curve of the bit stream.

Finally, the randomness of the generated random bits is verified using the NIST Special Publication 800-22 statistical tests, by dividing 1-Gbit data into 1000 sequences of 1-Mbit [44]. When the significance level is set to 0.01, the randomness test is successful if the P-value is larger than 0.0001 and the proportion is within 0.99 ± 0.0094392. For the test items that produce multiple P-values and proportions, the worst case is selected and shown in Table 1, and the generated random bits successfully pass the 15 NIST sub-tests. The obtained maximum electrical-delay self-difference RBG rate is 500 Gb/s (100 GSa/s × 5 bits).

Table 1:

NIST SP 800-22 test results for random bit sequence.

Statistical test Electrical-delay self-difference RBG Optical-delay self-difference RBG Result
P-value Proportion P-value Proportion
Frequency 0.32214 0.985 0.60799 0.992 Success
Block frequency 0.27027 0.989 0.80556 0.986 Success
Runs 0.37701 0.987 0.16080 0.989 Success
Longest run 0.29109 0.989 0.14532 0.986 Success
Rank 0.62255 0.983 0.44655 0.992 Success
FFT 0.40296 0.987 0.14781 0.988 Success
Nonoverlaping template 0.00798 0.989 0.00487 0.986 Success
Overlapping template 0.30266 0.986 0.30412 0.990 Success
Universal 0.60177 0.987 0.11606 0.990 Success
Linear complexity 0.23927 0.989 0.14125 0.986 Success
Serial 0.13650 0.990 0.13572 0.991 Success
Approximate entropy 0.01395 0.993 0.99743 0.990 Success
Cumulative sums 0.04365 0.986 0.14206 0.987 Success
Random excursions 0.12120 0.986 0.01572 0.987 Success
Random excursions variant 0.05205 0.986 0.00714 0.995 Success

We also conducted an optical-delay self-difference experiment for random bit generation via balanced-detection method in Ref. [45]. As shown in Figure 5, the chaotic light from the microcavity laser at 20 mA is firstly amplified and filtered. Then, the light is split into two paths after a 50:50 fiber coupler (FC). Delayed fiber (DL) with the length of 1 m (corresponding to 5 ns optical delay) is introduced into one of the two paths. The two beams are simultaneously detected by a balanced detector (Finisar BPD V2120R, 43 GHz bandwidth). Then the converted electrical signal is collected by the real-time oscilloscope at 100 GSa/s sampling rate. Finally, a least-significant-bits method is adopted and 5-LSBs are selected to generate 500 Gb/s physical random number sequence. Similarly, 1000 sequences of 1-Mbit stream are set to the NIST SP 800-22 randomness test. All sub-tests are successful and shown in Table 1.

Figure 5: 
Experimental setup for optical-delay self-difference random bit generator. FC, fiber coupler; DL, delayed fiber.
Figure 5:

Experimental setup for optical-delay self-difference random bit generator. FC, fiber coupler; DL, delayed fiber.

4 Conclusions

In summary, tri-transverse-mode lasing with mode intervals of around 10–30 GHz has been demonstrated in a deformed square microcavity laser. The strong mode interaction between the 0th and 1st order transverse modes with the oscillation of the local photon density distribution inside the microcavity results in self-chaotic laser output, as in Ref. [33]. Moreover, the 2nd order transverse mode can induce additional beating peaks for the chaotic RF spectrum and greatly enhance the chaotic signal bandwidth. Based on tri-mode chaotic output, we have realized 500 Gb/s physical random number generation using electrical and optical delay-subtracting RBG schemes. Based on the proposed method of bandwidth-enhancement, chaotic bandwidth up to 100 GHz is expected to be realized with more transverse modes as the direct modulation bandwidth in Ref. [46]. Our work paves the way for mode engineering to enhance the self-chaotic bandwidth for deformed microcavity lasers. A random number generator based on the self-chaos deformed square laser can simplify the system greatly due to a small footprint and low power consumption for the chaotic microlasers. Moreover, self-chaotic lasers have potential applications in secure communication, chaos radar, and optical reservoir computing.


Corresponding author: Yong-Zhen Huang, State Key Laboratory of Integrated Optoelectronics, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China; and Center of Material Science and Optoelectronic Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China, E-mail:

Funding source: Strategic Priority Research Program, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Award Identifier / Grant number: XDB43000000

Award Identifier / Grant number: 12274407

Award Identifier / Grant number: 61874113

Award Identifier / Grant number: 61935018

Award Identifier / Grant number: 62122073

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. C. L. Zou of the University of Science and Technology of China for fruitful discussions. We also thank Dr. Y. T Huang and Dr. C. G. Ma of the Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences for help with device fabrication and data analysis.

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61935018, 12274407, 61874113, 62122073), and Strategic Priority Research Program, Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB43000000).

  2. Author contributions: J. C. Li and Y. Z. Huang proposed the original idea and prepared the manuscript. J. C. Li performed the experiments including device fabrication and analysing data. J. L. Xiao and Y. D. Yang contributed device fabrication and data analysis. Y. L. Chen contributed data analysis. Y. Z. Huang conducted the project supervision. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflicts of interest.

  4. Data availability: The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

[1] N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, “Quantum cryptography,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 74, pp. 145–195, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.74.145.Search in Google Scholar

[2] S. Asmussen and P. W. Glynn, Stochastic Simulation: Algorithms and Analysis, New York, Springer, 2007.10.1007/978-0-387-69033-9Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. Herrero-Collantes and J. C. Garcia-Escartin, “Quantum random number generators,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 89, p. 015004, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.89.015004.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Y. Liu, X. Yuan, M.-H. Li, et al.., “High-speed device-independent quantum random number generation without a detection loophole,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 120, p. 010503, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.120.010503.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] H. Gao, A. B. Wang, L. S. Wang, et al.., “0.75 Gbit/s high-speed classical key distribution with mode-shift keying chaos synchronization of Fabry-Perot lasers,” Light: Sci. Appl., vol. 10, p. 172, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00610-w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] C. S. Petrie and J. A. Connelly, “A noise-based ic random number generator for applications in cryptograph,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I-Fundam. Theor. Appl., vol. 47, pp. 615–621, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/81.847868.Search in Google Scholar

[7] B. Sunar, W. J. Martin, and D. R. Stinson, “A provably secure true random number generator with built-in tolerance to active attacks,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 56, pp. 109–119, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.2007.250627.Search in Google Scholar

[8] G. M. Kim, J. H. In, Y. S. Kim, et al.., “Self-clocking fast and variation tolerant true random number generator based on a stochastic mott memristor,” Nat. Commun., vol. 12, p. 2906, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23184-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] C. Gabriel, C. Wittmann, D. Sych, et al.., “A generator for unique quantum random numbers based on vacuum states,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 4, pp. 711–715, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.197.Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Uchida, K. Amano, M. Inoue, et al.., “Fast physical random bit generation with chaotic semiconductor lasers,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 2, pp. 728–732, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2008.227.Search in Google Scholar

[11] I. Reidler, Y. Aviad, M. Rosenbluh, and I. Kanter, “Ultrahigh-speed random number generation based on a chaotic semiconductor laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 103, p. 024102, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.103.024102.Search in Google Scholar

[12] I. Kanter, Y. Aviad, I. Reidler, E. Cohen, and M. Rosenbluh, “An optical ultrafast random bit generator,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 4, pp. 58–61, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.235.Search in Google Scholar

[13] G. Verschaffelt, M. Khoder, and G. Van der Sande, “Random number generator based on an integrated laser with on-chip optical feedback,” Chaos, vol. 27, p. 114310, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5007862.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] S. Y. Xiang, B. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. A. Han, A. J. Wen, and Y. Hao, “2.24-Tb/s physical random bit generation with minimal post-processing based on chaotic semiconductor lasers network,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 37, pp. 3987–3993, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2019.2920476.Search in Google Scholar

[15] X. Z. Li and S. C. Chan, “Random bit generation using an optically injected semiconductor laser in chaos with oversampling,” Opt. Lett., vol. 37, pp. 2163–2165, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.37.002163.Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. Sciamanna and K. A. Shore, “Physics and applications of laser diode chaos,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 9, pp. 151–162, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.326.Search in Google Scholar

[17] T. Mukai and K. Otsuka, “New route to optical chaos: successive-subharmonic-oscillation cascade in a semiconductor laser coupled to an external cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 55, pp. 1711–1714, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.55.1711.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] J. Mork, J. Mark, and B. Tromborg, “Route to chaos and competition between relaxation oscillations for a semiconductor laser with optical feedback,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 65, pp. 1999–2002, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.65.1999.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] L. Jumpertz, K. Schires, M. Carras, M. Sciamanna, and F. Grillot, “Chaotic light at mid-infrared wavelength,” Light: Sci. Appl., vol. 5, p. e16088, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.88.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Y. Deng, Z. F. Fan, B. B. Zhao, et al.., “Mid-infrared hyperchaos of interband cascade lasers,” Light: Sci. Appl., vol. 11, p. 7, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00697-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] T. B. Simpson, J. M. Liu, A. Gavrielides, V. V. Kovanis, and P. M. Alsing, “Period-doubling cascades and chaos in a semiconductor laser with optical injection,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 51, pp. 4181–4185, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.51.4181.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] F. Y. Lin, S. Y. Tu, C. C. Huang, and S. M. Chang, “Nonlinear dynamics of semiconductor lasers under repetitive optical pulse injection,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., vol. 15, pp. 604–611, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstqe.2008.2010558.Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. Argyris, M. Hamacher, K. E. Chlouverakis, A. Bogris, and D. Syvridis, “Photonic integrated device for chaos applications in communications,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 100, p. 194101, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.194101.Search in Google Scholar

[24] J. G. Wu, L. J. Zhao, Z. M. Wu, et al.., “Direct generation of broadband chaos by a monolithic integrated semiconductor laser chip,” Opt. Express, vol. 21, pp. 23358–23364, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.21.023358.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] S. Sunada, T. Fukushima, S. Shinohara, T. Harayama, K. Arai, and M. Adachi, “A compact chaotic laser device with a two-dimensional external cavity structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 104, p. 241105, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4883636.Search in Google Scholar

[26] P. Munnelly, B. Lingnau, M. M. Karow, et al.., “On-chip optoelectronic feedback in a micropillar laser-detector assembly,” Optica, vol. 4, pp. 303–306, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.4.000303.Search in Google Scholar

[27] L. X. Zou, B. W. Liu, X. M. Lv, Y. D. Yang, J. L. Xiao, and Y. Z. Huang, “Integrated semiconductor twin-microdisk laser under mutually optical injection,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 106, p. 191107, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4921098.Search in Google Scholar

[28] S. Ohara, A. K. Dal Bosco, K. Ugajin, A. Uchida, T. Harayama, and M. Inubushi, “Dynamics-dependent synchronization in on-chip coupled semiconductor lasers,” Phys. Rev. E., vol. 96, p. 032216, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.96.032216.Search in Google Scholar

[29] M. Virte, K. Panajotov, H. Thienpont, and M. Sciamanna, “Deterministic polarization chaos from a laser diode,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 7, pp. 60–65, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.286.Search in Google Scholar

[30] K. Kim, S. Bittner, Y. Zeng, et al.., “Massively parallel ultrafast random bit generation with a chip-scale laser,” Science, vol. 371, pp. 948–952, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc2666.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Y. Guo, Q. Cai, P. Li, et al.., “Ultrafast and real-time physical random bit extraction with all-optical quantization,” Adv. Photonics, vol. 4, p. 035001, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.ap.4.3.035001.Search in Google Scholar

[32] A. Zhao, N. Jiang, J. Peng, S. Liu, Y. Zhang, and K. Qiu, “Parallel generation of low-correlation wideband complex chaotic signals using CW laser and external-cavity laser with self-phase-modulated injection,” Opto-Electron. Adv., vol. 5, p. 200026, 2022. https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2022.200026.Search in Google Scholar

[33] C. G. Ma, J. L. Xiao, Z. X. Xiao, Y. D. Yang, and Y. Z. Huang, “Chaotic microlasers caused by internal mode interaction for random number generation,” Light: Sci. Appl., vol. 11, p. 187, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-00890-w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[34] S. Bittner and M. Sciamanna, “Complex nonlinear dynamics of polarization and transverse modes in a broad-area VCSEL,” APL Photonics, vol. 7, p. 126108, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0104852.Search in Google Scholar

[35] J. C. Li, Y. L. Li, Y. X. Dong, Y. D. Yang, J. L. Xiao, and Y. Z. Huang, “400 Gb/s physical random number generation based on deformed square self-chaotic lasers,” Chin. Opt. Lett., vol. 21, p. 061901, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3788/col202321.061901.Search in Google Scholar

[36] H. Z. Weng, Y. Z. Huang, Y. D. Yang, X. W. Ma, J. L. Xiao, and Y. Du, “Mode Q factor and lasing spectrum controls for deformed square resonator microlasers with circular sides,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 95, p. 013833, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.95.013833.Search in Google Scholar

[37] E. Heidari, H. Dalir, M. Ahmed, V. J. Sorger, and R. T. Chen, “Hexagonal transverse-coupled-cavity VCSEL redefining the high-speed lasers,” Nanophotonics, vol. 9, pp. 4743–4748, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0437.Search in Google Scholar

[38] H. Long, Y. Z. Huang, X. W. Ma, et al.., “Dual-transverse-mode microsquare lasers with tunable wavelength interval,” Opt. Lett., vol. 40, pp. 3548–3551, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.40.003548.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] S. Wang, S. Liu, Y. Liu, et al.., “Direct observation of chaotic resonances in optical microcavities,” Light: Sci. Appl., vol. 10, p. 135, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00578-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] F. Y. Lin and J. M. Liu, “Nonlinear dynamical characteristics of an optically injected semiconductor laser subject to optoelectronic feedback,” Opt. Commun., vol. 221, pp. 173–180, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0030-4018(03)01466-4.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Y. L. Li, C. G. Ma, J. L. Xiao, et al.., “Wideband chaotic tri-mode microlasers with optical feedback,” Opt. Express, vol. 30, pp. 2122–2130, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.449707.Search in Google Scholar

[42] P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, “Characterization of strange attractors,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 50, pp. 346–349, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.50.346.Search in Google Scholar

[43] K. Fraedrich and R. H. Wang, “Estimating the correlation dimension of an attractor from noisy and small datasets based on re-embedding,” Phys. D, vol. 65, pp. 373–398, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(93)90063-7.Search in Google Scholar

[44] NIST, SP 800-22, Statistical Test Suite. 2010. Available at: https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/Random-Bit-Generation/Documentation-and-Software.Search in Google Scholar

[45] L. Li, A. Wang, P. Li, H. Xu, L. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Random bit generator using delayed self-difference of filtered amplified spontaneous emission,” IEEE Photonics J., vol. 6, pp. 1–9, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2014.2304555.Search in Google Scholar

[46] E. Heidari, M. Ahmed, H. Dalir, A. Bakry, A. Alshahrie, and V. J. Sorger, “VCSEL with multi-transverse cavities with bandwidth beyond 100 GHz,” Nanophotonics, vol. 10, pp. 3779–3788, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2021-0442.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0549).


Received: 2023-08-30
Accepted: 2023-10-04
Published Online: 2023-10-13

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0549/html
Scroll to top button