Defending ‘Islamic Belief’ Against Discrimination: Religious Minority Group Discourse in Indonesia
-
Andi Muhammad Irawan
,
Andi Syurganda
Abstract
This paper employs Critical Discourse Analysis to examine resistance discourses as created by the Ahmadiyya followers – a self-defined sect of Islam – to argue against negative discourses undermining them in Indonesia. In some legal proclamations and statements delivered by state officials and the representatives of majority Muslims in the country, the followers of the sect, especially those affiliated to the JAI (Jemaat Ahmadiyya Indonesia) are excluded from Islamic community. By using Van Dijk’s ideological square, this study aims at identifying resistance discourses created by the JAI followers as the defence strategies to oppose negative discourses presenting them as the non-believers of Islam. The resistance discourses are apparent in both written and spoken texts, such as books, articles, speeches, and public debates created by the sect. The finding reveals that the JAI followers create discourses of victim, defender of Islam, imperialism, illegitimacy, and discourse of public deception using various discourse strategies namely victimization, scare tactics, positive attribution, quotation, power delegitimising and negative portraits of misbehaving.
References
Asia Sentinel. 2011. Intolerance Turns Deadly in Indonesia. www.asiasentinel.com . Hong Kong: Asia Sentinel. https://www.asiasentinel.com/politics/intolerance-turns-deadly/ (accessed May 7, 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Beckett, K., and B. Hoffman. 2005. “Challenging Medicine: Law, Resistance, and the Cultural Politics of Childbirth.” Law & Society Review 39 (1): 125–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-9216.2005.00079.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Belmonte, I. A., A. McCabe, and D. Chornet-Roses. 2010. “In Their Own Words: The Construction of the Image of the Immigrant in Peninsular Spanish Broadsheets and Freesheets.” Discourse & Communication 4 (3): 227–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310373218.Suche in Google Scholar
Blackledge, A. 2006. “The Racialization of Language in British Political Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 3 (1): 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900600589325.Suche in Google Scholar
Burhani, A. N. 2013. “The Ahmadiyya and the Study of Comparative Religion in Indonesia: Controversies and Influences.” Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 25 (2): 141–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2013.864191.Suche in Google Scholar
Burhani, A. N. 2014. “Treating Minorities with fatwas: A Study of the Ahmadiyya Community in Indonesia.” Contemporary Islam (Springer) 8 (3): 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-013-0278-3.Suche in Google Scholar
Colbran, N. 2010. “Realities and Challenges in Realising Freedom of Religion or Belief in Indonesia.” The International Journal of Human Rights 14 (5): 678–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642980903155166.Suche in Google Scholar
Darsus Magazine. 2013a. Ahmadiyah Amerika miliki banyak ide kreatif kenalkan Islam dan Nabi SAW. Jakarta: Darsus.Suche in Google Scholar
Darsus Magazine. 2013b. R. Ahmadsarido sang propagandanis kemerdekaan RI. Jakarta: Darsus.Suche in Google Scholar
De Cock, C. 1998. “Organizational Change and Discourse: Hegemony, Resistance and Reconstitution.” Management 1 (1): 1–22.Suche in Google Scholar
Deanova, A. 2013. Kontroversi nasib Ahmadiyah Part 2. Jakarta: TV One. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjFEh8kUl6s (accessed March 11, 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Fathoni, M. 2002. Paham Mahdi Syi’ah dan Ahmadiyah dalam perspektif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.Suche in Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J., D. C. S. Li, and S. Tran. 2002. “Discriminatory News Discourse: Some Hong Kong Data.” Discourse & Society 13 (3): 319–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013003052.Suche in Google Scholar
Freedman, A., and R. Tiburzi. 2012. “Progress and Caution: Indonesia’s Democracy.” Asian Affairs: An American Review 39 (3): 131–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2012.704832.Suche in Google Scholar
Harsono, A. 2010. Ahmadiyah, rechtstaat, dan hak azasi manusia. Jakarta: www.andreasharsono.net. http://adreasharsono.blogspot.com/2010/02/ahmadiyah-rechtstaat-dan-hak-asasi_18.html (Accessed June 9, 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Irawan, A. M. 2017. “They are not Muslims: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Ahmadiyya Sect Issue in Indonesia.” Discourse & Society 28 (2): 162–81, https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516685462.Suche in Google Scholar
Jamil, U. 2002. Minorities and ‘Islamic’ State: Explaining Baha’i and Ahmadi marginalisation in Iran and Pakistan (Unpublished master thesis). Canada: McGill University.Suche in Google Scholar
Jansen, S. 2000. “Victims, Underdogs, and Rebels: Discursive Practices of Resistance in Serbian Protest.” Critique of Anthropology 20 (4): 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x0002000401.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, D. C. 2011. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Ethnography of Language Policy.” Critical Discourse Studies 8 (4): 267–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.601636.Suche in Google Scholar
Khanif, A. 2009. “Legal Wrestling to Reinforce the Rights to Equality for Minority Religious Group in Indonesia.” In Proceeding of the Conferences at the 4th International Conference on Human Rights & Human Development. Bangkok: Research Institute of Human Rights.Suche in Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, M. 2009. “The Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers, and Immigrants in British Newspapers During the Balkan Conflict (1999) and the British General Election (2005).” Discourse & Society 20 (4): 477–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509104024.Suche in Google Scholar
Kompas Daily, Newspaper. 2011. Komnas Temukan Kejanggalan. Jakarta: Kompas. http://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2011/02/11/03202499/komnas.temukan.kejanggalan (accessed May 7, 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Medina, J. 2011. “Toward a Foucauldian Epistemology of Resistance: Counter-Memory, Epistemic Friction, and Guerilla Pluralism.” Foucault Studies 12: 9–35. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i12.3335.Suche in Google Scholar
Mietzner, M. 2012. “Yudoyono’s Legacy Between Stability and Stagnation.” In Southeast Asian Affairs 2012, edited by D. Singh, and P. Thambipillai. Pasir Panjang: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar
Nadwi, S. A. H. A. 2005. Tikaman Ahmadiyah terhadap Islam. Jakarta: Fadlindo Media Utama.Suche in Google Scholar
Pengurus Besar Jemaat Ahamdiyah Indonesia. 2007. Kami orang Islam. Jakarta: Pengurus Besar Jemaat Ahmadiyah Indonesia.Suche in Google Scholar
Prieur, D. 2006. Discourse of Concealment and Resistance: A Critical Feminist Disability Analysis (Unpublished master thesis). Canada: The University of British Columbia.Suche in Google Scholar
Saeed, S. 2007. “Pakistani Nationalism and the State Marginalisation of the Ahmadiyya Community in Pakistan.” Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 7 (3): 132–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9469.2007.tb00166.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Saeed, S. 2010. Politics of Exclusion: Muslim Nationalism, State Formation, and Legal Representations of the Ahmadiyya community in Pakistan (Unpublised doctoral thesis). The United States: The University of Michigan.Suche in Google Scholar
Suryawan, M. A. 2005. Bukan sekedar hitam putih: Penjelasan atas keberatan dan tuduhan yang sering diajukan kepada Jemaat Ahmadiyah. Jakarta: Arista Brahamtyasa.Suche in Google Scholar
Suryawan, M. A. 2010a. Ahmadiyah: Anda Salah Alamat, Pak Menteri Agama…. Jakarta: Kompasiana. http://www.kompasiana.com/m.a.suryawan/ahmadiyah-anda-salah-alamat-pakmenteri-agama_55001e83a33 (accessed May 8, 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Suryawan, M. A. 2010b. Ahmadiyah: Sisi Lain Fatwa MUI. Jakarta: Kompasiana. http://www.kompasiana.com/m.a.suryawan/ahmadiyah-sisi-lain-fatwa-mui_550014b7a33311177350f9fa (accessed May 8, 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Tilbury, F. 2000. “Challenging Racist Discourses: A Positive Contribution to Discourse Analysis.” In Proceeding at the Conferences in Sociological Sites/Sights. Adelaide, Australia: TASA 2000 Conference. Adelaide: TASA 2000 Conference.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. 1996. “Discourse, Power, and Access.” In Texts and Practices, Reading in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by C. R. C. Coulthard, and M. Coulthard. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. 2006. “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (2): 115–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. 2009. “Critical Discourse Studies: A Socio-Cognitive Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Wodak, and M. Meyer. London: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Laer, K., and M. Janssens. 2009. “Diversity & Resistance: Minority Professionals’ Experiences & Engagement with Diversity Discourses in Flanders.” In 6th International Critical Management Studies Conference. Antwerp.Suche in Google Scholar
Wodak, R., and M. Reisigl. 1999. “Discourse and Racism: European Perspective.” Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 175–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.175.Suche in Google Scholar
Wodak, R., and M. Reisigl. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
