Sincerity in Lithuanian epistolarity: Between truth and emotion

Sources and dictionaries

Biblija arba Šventasis Raštas. Ekumeninis leidimas [The Bible or the Holy Scripture. Ecumenical translation]. 1999. Vilnius: Lietuvos Biblijos draugija. http://biblija.lt/index.aspx?cmp=toc.Search in Google Scholar

Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos žodynas [Dictionary of Modern Lithuanian]. http://lkiis.lki.lt/dabartinis.Search in Google Scholar

King James Bible (Standard version). https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/.Search in Google Scholar

Latin Vulgate (St Jerome edition) via Perseus Digital Library. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0060.Search in Google Scholar

Lietuvių kalbos žodynas [Dictionary of the Lithuanian language]. http://lkz.lt/.Search in Google Scholar

Lietuviškos XVI–XIX a. Biblijos istorija [The history of the Lithuanian Bible from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries]. http://sr.lki.lt/Index.asp.Search in Google Scholar

Paulauskas, Jonas. 1987. Sisteminis lietuvių kalbos žodynas [Systemic dictionary of Lithuanian]. Vilnius: Mokslas. http://lkiis.lki.lt/sisteminis.Search in Google Scholar

Senieji raštai [Dabatase of Old Lithuanian texts]. http://seniejirastai.lki.lt/home.php.Search in Google Scholar

Sinonimų žodynas [Dictionary of Synonyms]. http://lkiis.lki.lt/sinonimu.Search in Google Scholar

The Database of Private Lithuanian Letters (DPLL). www.musulaiskai.lt.Search in Google Scholar

Thesaurus Latino–Lituanicus. http://www.thesaurus.flf.vu.lt/tezauras/pagalba.Search in Google Scholar

References

Aijmer, Karin. 1996. Conversational routines in English. Convention and creativity. London & New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Alphen, Ernst van & Mieke Bal. 2009. Introduction. In Ernst van Alphen, Mieke Bal & Carel Smith (eds.), The rhetoric of sincerity, 1–16. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503627017-002Search in Google Scholar

Austin, Frances. 2004. Heaving this importunity: The survival of opening formulas in letters in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Historical Sociolinguistics & Sociohistorical Linguistics 4. http://www.let.leidenuniv.nl/hsl_shl/heaving_this_importunity.htm (accessed 21 July 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. The William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beeman, William O. 2001. Emotion and sincerity in Persian discourse: Accomplishing the representation of inner states. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 148. 31–57.10.1515/ijsl.2001.013Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11(1). 1–34.10.1080/01638538809544689Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and effect. Text 9(1). 93–124.10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Čepaitienė, Giedrė & Algirdas Malakauskas. 2006. Padėkos semantika ir raiška [The semantics and expression of thanking]. Acta Humanitarica Universitatis Saulensis 1. 22–34.Search in Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 1981. ‘Poison to your soul.’ Thanks and apologies contrastively viewed. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routine. Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech, 69–91. The Hague, Paris & New York: Mouton Publishers.10.1515/9783110809145.69Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Bronwyn & Rom Harré. 1990. Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(1). 43–63.10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.xSearch in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164), 139–182. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.164.07duSearch in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. & Elise Kärkkäinen. 2012. Taking a stance on emotion: affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk 32(4). 433–451.10.1515/text-2012-0021Search in Google Scholar

Elspaß, Stephan. 2012. Between linguistic creativity and formulaic restriction: Cross-linguistic perspectives on nineteenth-century lower class writers’ private letters. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in late modern Europe, 45–64. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.218.04elsSearch in Google Scholar

Englebretson, Robert. 2007. Stancetaking in discourse: An introduction. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164), 1–25. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.164.02engSearch in Google Scholar

Erickson, Rebecca J. 1995. The importance of authenticity for self and society. Symbolic Interaction 18(2). 121–144.10.1525/si.1995.18.2.121Search in Google Scholar

Falkenberg, Gabriel. 1988. Insincerity and disloyalty. Argumentation 21. 89–97.10.1007/BF00179143Search in Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2004. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: from stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies 6(4). 427–448.10.1177/1461445604046585Search in Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2016. Sincerity and moral reanalysis of politeness in late modern English: Semantic change and contingent polysemy. In Don Chapman, Colette Moore & Miranda Wilcox (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language, vol. VII, 173–2002. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110494235-009Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1956. The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Hampshire, Stuart. 1971. Freedom of mind and other essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harré, Rom & Luk van Langenhove. 1991. Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 21(4). 393–407.10.1111/j.1468-5914.1991.tb00203.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan. 2007. Using corpus to investigate stance quantitatively and qualitatively. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164), 27–48. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.164.03hunSearch in Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra (ed). 2009a. Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009b. Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 3–28. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra. 2016. Indexicality, stance and fields in sociolinguistics. In Nikolas Coupland (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 86–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107449787.005Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. 2017. Speech acts and speech act sequences: greetings and farewells in the history of American English. Studia Neophilologica 89 (S1). 39–58.10.1080/00393274.2017.1358662Search in Google Scholar

Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2006. Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk 26(6). 699–731.10.1515/TEXT.2006.029Search in Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott F. 2009. Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. In Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 171–194. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott F. 2011. Stance in context: Affect, alignment and investment in the analysis of stancetaking. Paper presented at the iMean conference, The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK, 15 April.Search in Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott F., Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Jim Fitzpatrick, Xiaochuang Han & Jacob Eisenstein. 2018. Interactional stancetaking in online forums. Computational Linguistics 44(4). 683–718.10.1162/coli_a_00334Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do Linguistics with R. Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/z.195Search in Google Scholar

Marquilhas, Rita. 2012. A historical digital archive of Portuguese letters. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in late modern Europe (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 218), 31–43. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.218.03marSearch in Google Scholar

Moran, Richard. 2005. Problems of sincerity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian society, New Series 105. 325–345.Search in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.). 1996. Sociolinguistics and language history. Studies based on the corpus of early English correspondence (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 15). Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor. 1993. Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(3). 287–306.10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor. 1996. Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 17), 407–437. Cambridge, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ruskan, Anna. 2013. Nemorfologinio evidencialumo raiška ir turinys lietuvių kalboje: bevardės giminės būdvardžiai ir prieveiksmiai [The expression and contents of non-morphological evidentiality in Lithuanian: The case of neuter adjectives and adverbs]. Vilnius: Vilnius University doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Rutten, Gijsbert & Marijke van der Wal. 2012. Functions of epistolary formulae in Dutch letters from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(2). 173–201.10.1075/jhp.13.2.01rutSearch in Google Scholar

Rutten, Gijsbert & Marijke van der Wal. 2013. Epistolary formulae and writing experience in Dutch letters from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In Marijke J. van der Wal & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 1), 45–65. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/ahs.1.03rutSearch in Google Scholar

Rutten, Gijsbert & Marijke J. van der Wal. 2014. Letters as Loot. A sociolinguistic approach to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 2). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/ahs.2Search in Google Scholar

Smetona, Antanas & Aurelija Usonienė. 2012. Autoriaus pozicijos adverbialai ir adverbializacija lietuvių mokslo kalboje [Stance adverbials and adverbialization in Lithuanian academic discourse]. Kalbotyra 64(3). 124–139.10.15388/Klbt.2012.7664Search in Google Scholar

Scheibman, Joanne. 2007. Subjective and intersubjective uses of generalizations in English conversations. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164), 111–138. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.164.06schSearch in Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller, Benedikt Heller & Melanie Röthlisberger. 2016. Around the world in three alternations. Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide 37(2). 109–137.10.1075/eww.37.2.01szmSearch in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. & R. Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests and trees of York English: ‘Was/were’ variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24. 135–178.10.1017/S0954394512000129Search in Google Scholar

Tamošiūnaitė, Aurelija. 2014. Letter writing as a social practice: Self-reference to writing in Lithuanian correspondence. Lituanus 60(3). 31–56.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Geoff & Susan Hunston. 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 1–27. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Trilling, Lionel. 1972. Sincerity and authenticity. London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vandenbussche, Wim. 1999. Arbeitersprache: a fiction? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 13. 87–103.10.1075/bjl.13.06vanSearch in Google Scholar

Vandenbussche, Wim. 2002. Dutch orthography in lower, middle and upper class documents in nineteenth-century Flanders. In Andrew R. Linn & Nicola McLelland (eds.), Standardization. Studies from the Germanic languages (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 235), 28–42. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/cilt.235.04vanSearch in Google Scholar

Williams, Graham. 2012. ‘That thought never ytt entered my harte’: rhetoricalities of sincerity in Early Modern English. English Studies 93(7). 809–832.10.1080/0013838X.2012.700185Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Graham. 2018. Sincerity in Medieval English language and literature. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-54069-0Search in Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid & Cape Town: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519772Search in Google Scholar