Parameter identification of Yoshida–Uemori combined hardening model by using a variable step size firefly algorithm

References

[1] D. Banabic, Sheet Metal Forming Processes – Constitutive Modelling and Numerical Simulation, Berlin,Springer-Verlag, 2010.10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1Search in Google Scholar

[2] F. Yoshida and T. Uemori, “A model of large-strain cyclic plasticity describing the Bauschinger effect and workhardening stagnation,” Int. J. Plast., vol. 18, pp. 661–686, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00050-X.Search in Google Scholar

[3] F. Ellyin and Z. Xia, “Challenges in developing a general constitutive relation for cyclic loading,” Mater. Test., vol. 48, pp. 14–20, 2002, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.100705.Search in Google Scholar

[4] F. Yoshida and T. Uemori, “A model of large-strain cyclic plasticity and its application to springback simulation,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 45, pp. 1687–1702, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2003.10.013.Search in Google Scholar

[5] F. Barlat, J. J. Gracio, M.-G. Lee, E. F. Rauch, and G. Vincze, “An alternative to kinematic hardening in classical plasticity,” Int. J. Plast., vol. 27, pp. 1309–1327, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.03.003.Search in Google Scholar

[6] C. Teodosiu and Z. Hu, “Evolution of the intragranular microstructure at moderate and large strains: modelling and computational significance,” in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes - Simulation of Materials Processing: Theory, Methods and Applications, 1995, pp. 173–182, Balkema, Rotterdam.Search in Google Scholar

[7] T. Phongsai, V. Uthaisangsuk, B. Chongthairungruang, S. Suranuntchai, and S. Jirathearanat, “Simplified identification of material parameters for Yoshida-Uemori kinematic hardening model,” in International Conference on Experimental Mechanics 2013 and Twelfth Asian Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Bellingham, Washington, 2014.10.1117/12.2054308Search in Google Scholar

[8] T. Phongsai, W. Julsri, B. Chongthairungruang, S. Suranuntchai, S. Jirathearanat, and V. Uthaisangsuk, “Identification of material parameters for springback prediction using cyclic tension-compression test,” Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., vol. 38, pp. 485–493, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14456/sjst-psu.2016.64.Search in Google Scholar

[9] C.-Y. Chang, M.-H. Ho, and P.-C. Shen, “Yoshida-Uemori material models in cyclic tension-compression tests and shear tests,” in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Thousand Oaks, California, SAGE, 2014, pp. 245–254.10.1177/0954405413499011Search in Google Scholar

[10] V. Buljak, Inverse Analyses with Model Reduction, Heidelberg; Berlin, Springer, 2012.10.1007/978-3-642-22703-5Search in Google Scholar

[11] Y. Li, J. He, B. Gu, and S. Li, “Identification of advanced constitutive model parameters through global optimization approach for DP780 steel sheet,” Proc. Eng., vol. 207, pp. 125–130, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.749.Search in Google Scholar

[12] B. Gu, J. He, S. Li, Y. Chen, and Y. Li, “Cyclic sheet metal test comparison and parameter calibration for springback prediction of dual-phase steel sheets,” J. Manufact. Sci. Eng., vol. 139, 2017, Art. no. 091010, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037040.Search in Google Scholar

[13] X. Xia, M. Gong, T. Wang, Y. Liu, H. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, “Parameter identification of the Yoshida-Uemori hardening model for remanufacturing,” Metals, vol. 11, pp. 1–15, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/met11111859.Search in Google Scholar

[14] S. Toros, “Parameters determination of Yoshida Uemori model through optimization process of cyclic tension-compression test and V-bending springback,” Latin Am. J. Solids Struct., vol. 13, pp. 1893–1911, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78252916.Search in Google Scholar

[15] X. Lemoine, Q. Chichery, J. M. Devin, and P. Duroux, “Identification protocol of Yoshida-Uemori hardening model,”in International Deep-Drawing Research Group Conference (IDDRG 2022),” in IOP Conf. Series and Engineering, vol. 1238, Bristol, England, IOP Publishing, 2022.10.1088/1757-899X/1238/1/012001Search in Google Scholar

[16] D. K. Banerjee, W. E. Luecke, M. A. Iadicola, and E. Rust, “Evaluation of methods for determining the Yoshida-Uemori combined isotropic/kinematic hardening model parameters from tension-compression tests of advanced lightweighting materials,” Mater. Today Commun., vol. 33, 2022, Art. no. 104270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104270.Search in Google Scholar

[17] O. B-Haddad, M. Solgi, and H. A. Loaiciga, Meta-Heuristic and Evolutionary Algorithms for Engineering Optimization, 1st ed., United States of America, Wiley Series, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[18] S.-C. Chu, T.-T. Wang, A. R. Yildiz, and J.-S. Pan, “Ship rescue optimization: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering problems,” J. Internet Technol., vol. 25, pp. 61–77, 2024, https://doi.org/10.53106/160792642024012501006.Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. Anosri, et al.., “A Comparative study of state-of-the-art metaheuristics for solving many-objective optimization problems of fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle conceptual design,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., vol. 30, pp. 3657–3671, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09914-z.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Z. Meng, B. S. Yıldız, G. Li, C. Zhong, S. Mirjalili, and A. R. Yildiz, “Application of state-of-the-art multiobjective metaheuristic algorithms in reliability-based design optimization: a comparative study,” Struct. Multidiscipl. Optimizat., vol. 191, pp. 1–27, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03639-0.Search in Google Scholar

[21] N. Sabangban, et al., “Simultaneous aerodynamic and structural optimization of a low-speed horizontal-axis wind turbine blade using metaheuristic algorithms,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 699–714, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0308.Search in Google Scholar

[22] P. Champasak, N. Panagant, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, P. Rajendran, and A. R. Yildiz, “Grid-based many-objective optimiser for aircraft conceptual design with multiple aircraft configurations,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 126, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106951.Search in Google Scholar

[23] S. M. Sait, P. Mehta, D. Gürses, and A. R. Yildiz, “Cheetah optimization algorithm for optimum design of heat exchangers,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1230–1236, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0015.Search in Google Scholar

[24] D. Gürses, P. Mehta, S. M. Sait, S. Kumar, and A. R. Yildiz, “A multi-strategy boosted prairie dog optimization algorithm for global optimization of heat exchangers,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 1396–1404, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0082.Search in Google Scholar

[25] M. U. Erdaş, M. Kopar, B. S. Yildiz, and A. R. Yildiz, “Optimum design of a seat bracket using artificial neural networks and dandelion optimization algorithm,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 1767–1775, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0201.Search in Google Scholar

[26] P. Mehta, S. M. Sait, B. S. Yıldız, M. U. Erdaş, M. Kopar, and A. R. Yıldız, “A new enhanced mountain gazelle optimizer and artificial neural network for global optimization of mechanical design problems,” Mater. Test., vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 544–552, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0332.Search in Google Scholar

[27] M. Kopar, A. R. Yıldız, and B. S. Yıldız, “Optimum design of a composite drone component using slime mold algorithm,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 1857–1864, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0245.Search in Google Scholar

[28] P. Mehta, B. S. Yildiz, S. M. Sait, and A. R. Yildiz, “Hunger games search algorithm for global optimization of engineering design problems,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 524–532, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0013.Search in Google Scholar

[29] M. Kopar and A. R. Yildiz, “Composite disc optimization using hunger games search optimization algorithm,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1222–1229, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0067.Search in Google Scholar

[30] S. Kumar, et al., “Chaotic marine predators algorithm for global optimization of real-world engineering problems,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 261, p. 110192, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110192.Search in Google Scholar

[31] B. S. Yıldız, “Robust design of electric vehicle components using a new hybrid salp swarm algorithm and radial basis function-based approach,” Int. J. Vehicle Design, vol. 83, pp. 38–53, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2020.114779.Search in Google Scholar

[32] B. S. Yildiz, S. Bureerat, N. Panagant, P. Mehta, and A. R. Yildiz, “Reptile search algorithm and kriging surrogate model for structural design optimization with natural frequency constraints,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1504–1511, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0048.Search in Google Scholar

[33] B. S. Yıldız, “Slime mould algorithm and kriging surrogate model-based approach for enhanced crasworthiness of electric vehicles,” Int. J. Vehicle Design, vol. 83, pp. 54–68, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2020.114786.Search in Google Scholar

[34] B. S. Yıldız, S. Kumar, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, S. M. Sait, and A. R. Yildiz, “A new chaotic Levy flight distribution optimization algorithm for solving constrained engineering problems,” Expert Syst., vol. 39, no. 8, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12992.Search in Google Scholar

[35] B. S. Yıldız, N. Pholdee, N. Panagant, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, and S. M. Sait, “A novel chaotic Henry gas solubility optimization algorithm for solving real-world engineering problems,” Eng. Comput., vol. 38, pp. 871–883, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01268-5.Search in Google Scholar

[36] A. Yildirim, E. Demirci, S. Karagöz, Ş. Özcan, and A. R. Yildiz, “Experimental and numerical investigation of crashworthiness performance for optimal automobile structures using response surface methodology and oppositional based learning differential evolution algorithm,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 346–363, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0304.Search in Google Scholar

[37] B. S. Yıldız, et al., “A novel hybrid arithmetic optimization algorithm for solving constrained optimization problems,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 271, p. 110554, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110554.Search in Google Scholar

[38] B. S. Yildiz, et al., “A novel hybrid flow direction optimizer-dynamic oppositional based learning algorithm for solving complex constrained mechanical design problems,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 134–143, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0183.Search in Google Scholar

[39] X.-S. Yang, Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms, 2nd ed., United Kingdom, Luniver Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[40] H. Wang, et al.., “Firefly algorithm with adaptive control parameters,” Soft Comput., vol. 21, pp. 5091–5102, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2104-3.Search in Google Scholar

[41] S. Yu, S. Zhu, Y. Ma, and D. Mao, “A variable step size firefly algorithm for numerical optimization,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 263, pp. 214–220, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.04.065.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Numisheet 2022: Benchmark Tests, The 12th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes, Canada, 2022. Available: https://www.tms.org/portal/Meetings_Events/2021/NUMISHEET2021/benchmarkTests.aspx#:∼:text=The%20NUMISHEET%20Benchmark%20Study%20is,challenging%20problems%20in%20metal%20forming.Search in Google Scholar

[43] J. O. Hallquist, Ls-Dyna Keyword User’s Manual, Volume II-Material Models, Livermore, California, Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[44] R. Hill, “A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals,” in Proceedings of the Royal Society A. Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, California, 1948, pp. 281–297.10.1098/rspa.1948.0045Search in Google Scholar