Abstract
Over the past decade, police departments in many countries have experimented with and increasingly adopted the use of police body-worn cameras (PBWCs). This article aims to examine the moral issues raised by the use of PBWCs, and to provide an overall assessment of the conditions under which the use of PBWCs is morally permissible. It first reviews the current evidence for the effects of using PBWCs. On the basis of this review the article sets out a teleological argument for the use of PBWCs. The final two sections of the article review two deontological objections to the use of PBWCs: the idea that use of PBWCs is based on or expresses disrespectful mistrust, and the idea that the use of PBWCs violates a right to privacy. The article argues that neither of these objections is persuasive, and concludes that we should conditionally accept and support the use of PBWCs.
Acknowledgements
I have presented drafts of this paper at a 2018 Roskilde University Moral Philosophy seminar, a 2019 conference on mass state surveillance at Karlsruhe Institut für Technologie, and the 2019 Braga Meetings in Ethics and Political Philosophy. I am grateful for helpful comments on these and other occasions from William Bülow, Matthew Hall, Sean Kaplan, Rune Klingenberg Hansen, Kristian Kragh, Peter Königs, Sune Lægaard, Chris Nathan, Nora Ni Loideain, Kevin Macnish, Ingmar Persson, Scott Robbins, Christian Seidel, Patrick Smith, Thomas Søbirk Petersen, Jørn Sønderholm, Jakob Thrane Mainz, and Anette Zimmerman. I am further grateful for many helpful comments from two anonymous reviewers for the journal and the guest editor of this special issue. Finally, the article owes a great debt above all to Jesper Ryberg, not merely for his invaluable comments on this specific article, but for his style of argument, long exposure to which I suspect has led me to inadvertently (if perhaps not quite successfully) imitate.
References
Adams, I. and Mastracci, S. (2017). ‘Visibility is a Trap: The Ethics of Police Body-Worn Cameras and Control’, Administrative Theory & Praxis 39 (4): 313–328.10.1080/10841806.2017.1381482Search in Google Scholar
Alfino, M. and Mayes, G.R. (2003). ‘Reconstructing the Right to Privacy’, Social Theory & Practice 29 (1): 1–18.10.5840/soctheorpract20032915Search in Google Scholar
American Civil Liberties Union. (2018). ‘A Model Act for Regulating the Use of Body Worn Cameras by Law Enforcement (Version 2.1)’, American Civil Liberties Union. URL: https://www.aclu.org/other/model-act-regulating-use-wearable-body-cameras-law-enforcement (accessed on January 10, 2020)Search in Google Scholar
Ariel, B. (2016). ‘Police Body Cameras in Large Police Departments’, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 106 (4): 729–768.Search in Google Scholar
Ariel, B., Farrar, W.A., and Sutherland, A. (2015). ‘The Effect of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Use of Force and Citizens’ Complaints against the Police: A Randomized Controlled Trial’, Journal of Quantitative Criminology 31 (3): 509–535.10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3Search in Google Scholar
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Magicks, S., and Henderson, R. (2016). ‘Wearing Body Cameras Increases Assaults against Officers and Does Not Reduce Police Use of Force: Results from a Global Multi-site Experiment’, European Journal of Criminology 13 (6): 744–755.10.1177/1477370816643734Search in Google Scholar
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S., and Henderson, R. (2016a). ‘“Contagious accountability”: A Global Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Citizens’ Complaints against the Police’, Criminal Justice and Behavior 44 (2): 293–316.10.1177/0093854816668218Search in Google Scholar
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S., and Henderson, R. (2016b). ‘Report: Increases in Police Use of Force in the Presence of Body-worn Cameras are Driven by Officer Discretion: A Protocol-based Subgroup Analysis of Ten Randomized Experiments’, Journal of Experimental Criminology 12 (3): 453–463.10.1007/s11292-016-9261-3Search in Google Scholar
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., and Sosinski, G. (2018). ‘The Deterrence Spectrum: Explaining Why Police Body-Worn Cameras ‘Work’ or ‘Backfire’ in Aggressive Police–Public Encounters’, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 12 (1): 6–26.10.1093/police/paw051Search in Google Scholar
Armacost, B.E. (2004). ‘Organizational Culture and Police Misconduct’, George Washington University Law Review 72 (3): 453–546.10.2139/ssrn.412620Search in Google Scholar
Brown, C. (2011). ‘Consequentialise This’, Ethics 121 (4): 749–771.10.1086/660696Search in Google Scholar
Corlett, J.A. (2002). ‘The Nature and Value of the Moral Right to Privacy’, Public Affairs Quarterly 16 (4): 329–350.Search in Google Scholar
Coudert, F., Butin, D., and Le Métayer, D. (2015). ‘Body-worn Cameras for Police Accountability: Opportunities and Risks’, Computer Law & Security Review 31 (6): 749–762.10.1016/j.clsr.2015.09.002Search in Google Scholar
Cubitt, T.I., Lesic, R., Myers, G.L., and Corry, R. (2017). ‘Body-worn Video: A Systematic Review of Literature’, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 50 (3): 379–396.10.1177/0004865816638909Search in Google Scholar
Darwall, S.L. (1977). ‘Two Kinds of Respect’, Ethics 88 (1): 36–49.10.1086/292054Search in Google Scholar
Darwall, S.L. (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Davis, S. (2009). ‘Is There a Right to Privacy?’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4): 450–475.10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01349.xSearch in Google Scholar
Doyle, T. (2009). ‘Privacy and Perfect Voyeurism’, Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3): 181–189.10.1007/s10676-009-9195-9Search in Google Scholar
Eidelson, B. (2015). Discrimination and Disrespect (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732877.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Eitle, D., D’Alessio, S.J., and Stolzenberg, L. (2014). ‘The Effect of Organizational and Environmental Factors on Police Misconduct’, Police Quarterly 17 (2): 103–126.10.1177/1098611114522042Search in Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1997). ‘Equality and Respect’, Social Research 64 (1): 3–15.Search in Google Scholar
Gabriel, I. (2016). ‘Effective Altruism and Its Critics’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (4): 457–473.10.1111/japp.12176Search in Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (2007). ‘The Human Right to Privacy’, San Diego Law Review 44 (4): 697–721.Search in Google Scholar
Grossmith, L., Owens, C., Finn, W., Mann, D., Davies, T., and Baika, L. (2015). ‘police, camera, Evidence: London’s Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Body Worn video’, College of Policing Limited & Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime, https://whatworks.college.police.uk/Research/Documents/Police_Camera_Evidence.pdf (accessed on January 10, 2020)Search in Google Scholar
Harris, C.J. (2009). ‘Police Use of Improper Force: A Systematic Review of the Evidence’, Victims & Offenders 4 (1): 25–41.10.1080/15564880701568470Search in Google Scholar
Hedberg, E.C., Katz, C.M., and Choate, D.E. (2017). ‘Body-Worn Cameras and Citizen Interactions with Police Officers: Estimating Plausible Effects Given Varying Compliance Levels’, Justice Quarterly 34 (4): 627–651.10.1080/07418825.2016.1198825Search in Google Scholar
Hellman, D. (2008). When Is Discrimination Wrong? (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Search in Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W.N. (1913). ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’, The Yale Law Journal 23 (1): 16–59.10.2307/j.ctv39x51k.6Search in Google Scholar
Jennings, W.G., Lynch, M.D., and Fridell, L.A. (2015). ‘Evaluating the Impact of Police Officer Body-worn Cameras (Bwcs) on Response-to-resistance and Serious External Complaints: Evidence from the Orlando Police Department (OPD) Experience Utilizing a Randomized Controlled Experiment’, Journal of Criminal Justice 43 (6): 480–486.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.10.003Search in Google Scholar
Kane, R.J. and White, M.D. (2009). ‘Bad Cops’, Criminology & Public Policy 8 (4): 737–769.10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00591.xSearch in Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2013). Born Free and Equal? A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature of Discrimination (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199796113.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lum, C., Koper, C., Merola, L., Scherer, A., and Reioux, A. (2015). ‘Existing and Ongoing Body Worn Camera Research: Knowledge Gaps and Opportunities’, Laura and John Arnold Foundation. http://cebcp.org/wp-content/technology/BodyWornCameraResearch.pdf (accessed on January 10, 2020)Search in Google Scholar
Lum, C., Stoltz, M., Koper, C.S., and Scherer, J.A. (2019). ‘Research on Body-worn Cameras’, Criminology & Public Policy 18 (1): 93–118.10.1111/1745-9133.12412Search in Google Scholar
MacAskill, W. (2015). Doing Good Better: How Effective Altruism Can Help You Make a Difference (New York: Random House).Search in Google Scholar
Macnish, K. (2018). ‘Government Surveillance and Why Defining Privacy Matters in a Post-Snowden World’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (2): 417–432.10.1111/japp.12219Search in Google Scholar
Marmor, A. (2015). ‘What is the Right to Privacy?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (1): 3–26.10.1111/papa.12040Search in Google Scholar
Marthews, A. and Tucker, C.E. (2017). ‘Government Surveillance and Internet Search Behavior’, SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2412564 (accessed on January 10, 2020)10.2139/ssrn.2412564Search in Google Scholar
Maskaly, J., Donner, C., Jennings, W.G., Ariel, B., and Sutherland, A. (2017). ‘The Effects of Body-worn Cameras (Bwcs) on Police and Citizen Outcomes: A State-of-the-art Review’, Policing: An International Journal 40 (4): 672–688.10.1108/PIJPSM-03-2017-0032Search in Google Scholar
McCloskey, H.J. (1980). ‘Privacy and the Right to Privacy’, Philosophy 55 (211): 17–38.10.1017/S0031819100063725Search in Google Scholar
Morgan, J. and Silverstone, D. (2017). ‘Trialling Body-Worn Video Cameras for City of London Police: Officer Perceptions and Justice outcomes’, City of London Police, http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/9119/1/Trialling-body-worn-video-cameras-for-City-of-London-Police-officer-perceptions-and-justice-outcomes%20%281%29.pdf (accessed on January 10, 2020)Search in Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1998). ‘Concealment and Exposure’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1): 3–30.10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00057.xSearch in Google Scholar
Oberdiek, J. (2008). ‘Specifying Rights Out of Necessity’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1): 127–146.10.1093/ojls/gqm028Search in Google Scholar
Pelfrey, W.V. and Keener, S. (2018). ‘Body-worn Cameras and Officer Perceptions: A Mixed-method Pretest Posttest of Patrol Officers and Supervisors’, Journal of Crime and Justice 41 (5): 1–18.10.1080/0735648X.2018.1479287Search in Google Scholar
Penney, J.W. (2016). ‘Chilling Effects: Online Surveillance and Wikipedia Use’, Berkeley Technology & Law Journal 31 (1): 118–182.Search in Google Scholar
Penney, J.W. (2017). ‘Internet surveillance, regulation, and Chilling Effects Online: A Comparative Case Study’, Internet Policy Review 6 (2): 1–39.10.14763/2017.2.692Search in Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1989). ‘Consequentialism and Respect for Persons’, Ethics 100 (1): 116–126.10.1086/293149Search in Google Scholar
Rachels, J. (1975). ‘Why Privacy is Important’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 4 (4): 323–333.Search in Google Scholar
Ready, J.T. and Young, J.T.N. (2015). ‘The Impact of On-officer Video Cameras on Police–citizen Contacts: Findings from a Controlled Experiment in mesa, AZ’, Journal of Experimental Criminology 11 (3): 445–458.10.1007/s11292-015-9237-8Search in Google Scholar
Richards, P., Roberts, D., Britton, M., and Roberts, N. (2018). ‘The Exploration of Body-Worn Video to Accelerate the Decision Making Skills of Police Officers within an Experiential Learning Environment’, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 12 (1): 43–49.10.1093/police/pax017Search in Google Scholar
Rickless, S.C. (2007). ‘The Right to Privacy Unveiled’, San Diego Law Review 44 (1): 773–799.Search in Google Scholar
Ryberg, J. (2007). ‘Privacy rights, Crime prevention, CCTV, and the Life of Mrs Aremac’, Res Publica 13 (2): 127–143.10.1007/s11158-007-9035-xSearch in Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (1978). ‘Fear, Risk and the First Amendment: Unravelling the Chilling Effect’, Boston University Law Review 58 (5): 685–732.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, P. (2009). The Life You Can Save (London: Picador).Search in Google Scholar
Stalcup, M. and Hahn, C. (2016). ‘Cops, Cameras, and the Policing of Ethics’, Theoretical Criminology 20 (4): 482–501.10.1177/1362480616659814Search in Google Scholar
Stanley, J. (2015). ‘Police Body-Mounted Cameras: with Right Policies in place, a Win for All (V2.0)’, American Civil Liberties Union, https://www.aclu.org/other/police-body-mounted-cameras-right-policies-place-win-all?redirect=police-body-mounted-cameras-right-policies-place-win-all (accessed on January 10, 2020)Search in Google Scholar
Stoycheff, E., Liu, J., Xu, K., and Wibowo, K. (2019). ‘Privacy and the Panopticon: Online Mass Surveillance’s Deterrence and Chilling Effects’, New Media & Society 21 (3): 602–619.10.1177/1461444818801317Search in Google Scholar
Thomson, J.J. (1975). ‘The Right to Privacy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 4 (4): 295–314.10.1017/CBO9780511625138.012Search in Google Scholar
Unger, P. (1996). Living High and Letting Die (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/0195108590.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Wall, E. (2011). ‘Privacy and the Moral Right to Personal Autonomy’, International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (1): 69–85.10.5840/ijap20112517Search in Google Scholar
White, M.D., Gaub, J.E., and Todak, N. (2018). ‘Exploring the Potential for Body-Worn Cameras to Reduce Violence in Police–Citizen Encounters’, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 12 (1): 66–76.10.1093/police/paw057Search in Google Scholar
Yokum, D., Ravishankar, A., and Coppock, A. (2017). ‘Evaluating the Effects of Police Body-Worn Cameras: A Randomized Controlled Trial’, Office of the City Administrator. https://bwc.thelab.dc.gov/TheLabDC_MPD_BWC_Working_Paper_10.20.17.pdf (accessed on January 10, 2020)10.1073/pnas.1814773116Search in Google Scholar
Yokum, D., Ravishankar, A., and Coppock, A. (2019). ‘A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Effects of Police Body-worn Cameras’, PNAS 116 (21): 10329–10332.10.1073/pnas.1814773116Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction to the Special Issue on the Ethics of State Mass Surveillance
- Mass Surveillance: A Private Affair?
- Did the NSA and GCHQ Diminish Our Privacy? What the Control Account Should Say
- A Neo-Republican Theory of Just State Surveillance
- Privacy in Public: A Democratic Defense
- The Ethics of Police Body-Worn Cameras
- Privacy, the Internet of Things and State Surveillance: Handling Personal Information within an Inhuman System
- Articles
- Economic Exceptionalism? Justice and the Liberal Conception of Rights
- Telic Priority: Prioritarianism’s Impersonal Value
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction to the Special Issue on the Ethics of State Mass Surveillance
- Mass Surveillance: A Private Affair?
- Did the NSA and GCHQ Diminish Our Privacy? What the Control Account Should Say
- A Neo-Republican Theory of Just State Surveillance
- Privacy in Public: A Democratic Defense
- The Ethics of Police Body-Worn Cameras
- Privacy, the Internet of Things and State Surveillance: Handling Personal Information within an Inhuman System
- Articles
- Economic Exceptionalism? Justice and the Liberal Conception of Rights
- Telic Priority: Prioritarianism’s Impersonal Value