Home A zinc(ii) polymer constructed with 3,5-pyrazoledicarboxylic acid and 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)butane: Syntheses, crystal structures, and photoluminescence properties
Article Open Access

A zinc(ii) polymer constructed with 3,5-pyrazoledicarboxylic acid and 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)butane: Syntheses, crystal structures, and photoluminescence properties

  • Xiumei Li EMAIL logo , Yanju Huang , Bo Liu and Xiuyan Wang
Published/Copyright: April 25, 2025

Abstract

A novel zinc coordination polymer, [Zn3(pdc)2(bib)2.5(H2O)2] n ·4nH2O·0.5nbib (H3pdc = 3,5-pyrazoledicarboxylic acid, bib =1,4-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)butane), has been synthesized through hydrothermal methods and characterized structurally by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The polymer crystallizes in a triclinic space group P 1 ¯ , with unit cell parameters of a = 12.5612, b = 12.8928, c = 16.5488 Å, α = 105.556°, β = 102.193°, γ = 93.817°, and Z = 2. Zinc(ii) ions possess trigonal bipyramidal coordination, connecting different pdc3− anions to form tri-nuclear subunits. These subunits are linked to 2D networks via bib ligands. Additionally, the fluorescence properties of 1 have been examined.

Graphical abstract

1 Introduction

Owing to their unique structural tailorability and compositional diversity, metal coordination polymers (MCPs) have received much attention and become a hot topic due to their appealing applications as functional materials in adsorption separation, magnetism, luminescence, electrochemical sensors, and so on [1,2,3,4,5]. The variety of the structures produced relies on the presence of suitable metal–ligand interactions and supramolecular contacts, which is directly related to the coordination characteristics of the components, such as the charge and radii of metal ions, the amount of dentation, and steric hindrance of the ligands [6,7,8]. Although many MCPs with intriguing topologies have been reported, the control of precise structures of MCPs remains a great challenge in crystal engineering [9,10,11].

The idea of mixed ligands can indeed obtain a great diversity of MCPs [12,13,14,15]. However, the resulting structures are somewhat unpredictable, and the governing principles in this system are less ascertained and remain elusive [16,17,18]. The organic pyrazole–carboxylates as mixed ligand components are considered a type of remarkable building block in the construction of MCPs [19,20]. They have the ability to balance charges, good coordination ability, and stability in acid and base. On the other hand, imidazole and its derivatives are typically heterocyclic ligands with nitrogen as the donor atom. They exhibit a wide variety of pharmacological properties, such as anthelmintics, anticancer, antifungal, and anti-inflammatory activities. Therefore, the coordination chemistry of related ligands has been the subject of numerous investigations. As a good candidate, the conformational flexible ligand 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-yl)butane has been used as an auxiliary ligand because of the free rotation of the two imidazole planes, which results in cis- or anti-conformations as required by the metal coordination geometry in the assembly process [21,22,23]. Thus, it is meaningful to investigate the effect of the combination of mixed ligands, pyrazole–carboxylates and imidazole derivatives, on tuning the architectures of MCPs.

Based on the above consideration, 3,5-pyrazoledicarboxylic acid and 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-yl)butane were selected to react with Zn(ii) ion under hydrothermal conditions. As a result, a 2D complex of [Zn3(pdc)2(bib)2.5(H2O)2] n ·4nH2O·0.5nbib (1) was obtained and structurally characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, elemental analysis, powder XRD, FT-IR, and fluorescence spectrum techniques.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Structural analysis

Compound 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 ¯ with three crystallographically independent Zn(ii) ions, two pdc3− ligands, two and a half bib ligands, two coordinated water molecules, four crystallized water molecules, and a half free bib molecule in an asymmetric unit. As shown in Figure 1, each Zn(ii) ion is five-coordinated in the distorted {ZnO2N3} trigonal bipyramidal geometry. Zn(1) ion is defined by two nitrogen atoms (N3, N5) from two imidazole rings of two bib ligands, one nitrogen atom (N1) from the pyrazole ring of the pdc3− ligand, occupying the equatorial plane, and one carboxyl oxygen atom (O3) from pdc3− anions and one coordinated water molecule (O1W), occupying apical sites. The Zn(2) ion attaches to three nitrogen atoms (N2, N7, and N9) from two different bib ligands, one pdc3− ligand, and two carboxyl oxygen atoms (O1, O5) from two different pdc3− ligands. The coordination pattern of the Zn(3) ion is the same as the Zn(1) ion. The Zn–O bond distances range from 1.984(2) to 2.206(3) Å, and the Zn–N distances vary from 2.012(3) to 2.220(3) Å. The N(O)–Zn–O(N) angles fall in the 77.71(10)°–170.67(11)° range (Table 1).

Figure 1 
                  The coordination environment of the Zn(ii) ion in 1. Crystallized water molecules and hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.
Figure 1

The coordination environment of the Zn(ii) ion in 1. Crystallized water molecules and hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

Table 1

Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) for complex 1

d, Å
Zn(1)–N(1) 2.047(3) Zn(1)–N(3) 2.021(3)
Zn(1)–N(5) 2.022(3) Zn(1)–O(3) 2.155(3)
Zn(1)–O(1W) 2.112(3) Zn(2)–N(2) 2.158(3)
Zn(2)–N(7) 2.022(3) Zn(2)–N(9) 2.220(3)
Zn(2)–O(1) 1.984(2) Zn(2)–O(5) 2.010(3)
Zn(3)–N(10) 2.071(3) Zn(3)–N(11) 2.012(3)
Zn(3)–N(13) 2.032(3) Zn(3)–O(8) 2.206(3)
Zn(3)–O(2W) 2.071(3)
ω, °
N(3)–Zn(1)–N(5) 115.49(13) N(3)–Zn(1)–N(1) 122.47(12)
N(5)–Zn(1)–N(1) 121.67(12) N(3)–Zn(1)–O(1W) 91.30(12)
N(5)–Zn(1)–O(1W) 92.70(13) N(1)–Zn(1)–O(1W) 92.09(11)
N(5)–Zn(1)–O(3) 91.56(12) N(5)–Zn(1)–O(3) 94.08(11)
N(1)–Zn(1)–O(3) 78.90(10) O(1W)–Zn(1)–O(3) 170.67(11)
O(1)–Zn(2)–O(5) 144.45(12) O(1)–Zn(2)–N(7) 107.01(12)
O(5)–Zn(2)–N(7) 108.52(12) O(1)–Zn(2)–N(2) 80.04(10)
O(5)–Zn(2)–N(2) 92.05(11) N(7)–Zn(2)–N(2) 101.27(12)
O(1)–Zn(2)–N(9) 93.67(10) O(5)–Zn(2)–N(9) 77.71(10)
N(7)–Zn(2)–N(9) 105.82(11) N(2)–Zn(2)–N(9) 152.84(11)
N(11)–Zn(3)–N(13) 113.31(13) N(11)–Zn(3)–O(2W) 95.21(13)
N(13)–Zn(3)–O(2W) 93.16(13) N(11)–Zn(3)–N(10) 124.49(12)
N(13)–Zn(3)–N(10) 120.99(12) O(2W)–Zn(3)–N(10) 92.59(11)
N(11)–Zn(3)–O(8) 92.29(11) N(13)–Zn(3)–O(8) 89.80(11)
O(2W)–Zn(3)–O(8) 170.09(11) N(10)–Zn(3)–O(8) 77.81(10)

In 1, the bib ligand adopts an anti-conformation bridging mode with a dihedral angle between two imidazole rings of 0°. Each pdc3− ligand adopts the μ 2 coordination mode, bridging Zn(ii) atoms into tri-nuclear subunits, which are associated with 2D networks with cavities (Figure 2), which is similar to our reported structure [24]. More significantly, free bib molecules are located in voids, as listed in Figure 2, which may be used for adsorption in the material field.

Figure 2 
                  Two-dimensional network in 1.
Figure 2

Two-dimensional network in 1.

Further exploration of the crystal packing of compound 1 indicates that there are π–π interactions between the imidazole rings of bib ligands (Figure 3). The centroid-to-centroid distance between the adjacent rings is 3.487(3) Å for N5C20N6C22C21 and N11C36N12C38C37 (symmetry codes: −1 + x, y, z) imidazole rings. The perpendicular distance is −3.3965(17) Å for N5C20N6C22C21 and N11C36N12C38C37 (symmetry codes: −1 + x, y, z) imidazole rings. Additionally, hydrogen-bond interactions (Figure 4) are present in 1 between carboxylate oxygen atoms, crystallized water molecules, and coordinated water molecules (Table 2). Undoubtedly, these interactions stabilize the structure of complex 1 and form a 3D supramolecular architecture. From the view of topology, both ligands can be viewed as linkers, while metal ions can be viewed as three nodes, based on these simplified treatments, and the backbone structure of the complex can be described as a binodal (3,3)-connected net with the topological symbol of {5.82}{52.8}2 (Figure 5).

Figure 3 
                  
                     π–π interactions in 1.
Figure 3

ππ interactions in 1.

Figure 4 
                  H-bond interactions in 1.
Figure 4

H-bond interactions in 1.

Table 2

Hydrogen bonds for 1

D–H⋯A d(D–H)/Å d(H⋯A)/Å d(D⋯A)/Å ∠(DHA)/(°) Symmetry codes
O1W–H1WB⋯O5 0.85 1.79 2.6156 163
O1W–H1WA⋯O6 0.85 1.84 2.6713 166 x, –y, –z
O2W–H2WB⋯O1 0.84 1.83 2.6305 158 1+x, 1+y, 1+z
O2W–H2WA⋯O2 0.85 1.76 2.5933 165 x, 1–y, –z
Figure 5 
                  Topological structure of 1.
Figure 5

Topological structure of 1.

2.2 Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern and infrared spectrum analysis

The PXRD pattern of compound 1 is shown in Figure 6. The main peak positions observed are in good agreement with the simulated ones, indicating the phase purity of the original sample 1.

Figure 6 
                  PXRD analysis of complex 1: bottom-simulated, top-experimental.
Figure 6

PXRD analysis of complex 1: bottom-simulated, top-experimental.

The IR spectrum of 1 is exhibited in the wave-number range of 4,000 to 400 cm−1 (Figure 7). The peaks observed at 1,600 cm−1 for the complex are assigned to the stretching bands of ν as(COO−), whereas those at about 1,398 cm−1 are assigned to the stretching bands of ν s(COO−). The strong bands in the 656–759 cm−1 region can be attributed to the ν (C−N) stretching of N-heterocyclic rings of the bib ligand [25,26,27].

Figure 7 
                  IR spectrum of complex 1.
Figure 7

IR spectrum of complex 1.

2.3 Fluorescence spectrum

CPs with d10 metal centers possess numerous potential applications, such as in chemical sensors, photochemistry, and electroluminescence displays [28]. Hence, in our work, the photoluminescence properties of H3pdc, bib, and complex 1 were investigated in the solid state at room temperature. The emission peaks are shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8 
                  Solid-state emission spectrum of complex 1 and ligands at room temperature.
Figure 8

Solid-state emission spectrum of complex 1 and ligands at room temperature.

The main emission peak of the bib is at 396 nm. H3pdc shows an emission peak at 406 nm (λ ex = 348 nm). The emission bands of these free ligands are likely caused by the π* → n or π* → π transition [29]. Upon the complexation of these ligands with the Zn(ii) ion, the emission peaks occur at 394 nm (λ ex = 288 nm). For complex 1, the main emission peaks are blue-shifted by 12 nm compared to the free H3pdc. Because the Zn(ii) ion is difficult to oxidize or reduce due to its d 10 configuration, the emission of the complex is neither MLCT nor LMCT in nature [30]. As a result, the emission can be assigned to intraligand transitions [31].

2.4 Luminescence sensing of inorganic anions

Before all luminescence detection, the dried samples were ground into a fine powder in an agate mortar to enhance the disparity in H2O. The fluorescence sensing experiments of complex 1 were carried out by adding the powdered samples of 1 (5.0 mg) into different anionic aqueous solutions containing sodium salt or potassium salt (MnO4 2−, Cr2O7 2−, H2PO4 , NO3 , CO3 2−, Cl, and Br, 10−2 mol L−1 (M), 2 mL). After ultrasonication for 10 min to form homogeneous solutions, the luminescence data were collected at an excitation wavelength of 350 nm, respectively, at room temperature.

Considering the high water stability and distinct fluorescence properties of the complex in water, we further explored their potential ability to sense inorganic anions. The finely ground samples of 1 (5 mg) were immersed in 2 mL aqueous solutions containing MnO4 2−, Cr2O7 2−, H2PO4 , NO3 , CO3 2−, Cl and Br at the same concentration (10−2 M). As shown in Figure 9a and b, the luminescence intensity of 1 is slightly enhanced by the addition of Br and Cl. Interestingly, the Cr2O7 2− and MnO4 anions exhibit significant luminescence quenching effects, suggesting a high selectivity for Cr2O7 2− and MnO4 .

Figure 9 
                  (a) and (b) Fluorescence emission spectra of 1 dispersed in aqueous solutions with different anions at the same concentration.
Figure 9

(a) and (b) Fluorescence emission spectra of 1 dispersed in aqueous solutions with different anions at the same concentration.

3 Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a new zinc coordination polymer constructed with 3,5-pyrazoledicarboxylic acid and 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-yl)butane, [Zn3(pdc)2(bib)2.5(H2O)2] n ·4nH2O·0.5nbib (1). X-ray crystallography reveals that there is two-dimensional network constructed with five-coordinated Zn(ii) centers, bib and pdc3− ligands in complex 1. Additionally, it was characterized by elemental analysis, powder XRD, FT-IR, and fluorescence spectrum techniques.

4 Experimental

All starting raw materials were of analytical grade and were obtained from commercial sources without undergoing further purification. Elemental analysis for C, N, and H was carried out on a PE 240C elemental analyzer. The IR spectra (KBr pellets) were recorded on a Varian 640 FTIR spectrometer within the 400–4,000 cm−1 region. PXRD patterns were collected in the 2θ range of 5–50° with a scan speed of 0.1°·s−1 on a Bruker D8 Advance instrument using CuKα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) at room temperature. The luminescence spectra for sample 1 were measured at room temperature on a Hitachi F-7000 fluorescence spectrometer with a xenon arc lamp serving as the light source.

4.1 Preparation of [Zn3(pdc)2(bib)2.5(H2O)2] n ·4nH2O·0.5nbib (1)

A mixture containing Zn(OAc)2·2H2O (43.9 mg, 0.1 mmol), H3pdc (34.8 mg, 0.2 mmol), bib (38.0 mg, 0.2 mmol), 0.2 mL triethylamine, and 10 mL H2O was placed under hydrothermal conditions in a Teflon-lined Parr and heated at 140°C for 7 days. After cooling to room temperature, yellow block crystals of compound 1 were obtained with a 21% yield in terms of Zn. Elemental analysis for C40H48N16O14Zn3: C, 40.95; H, 4.12; N, 19.10 wt%. Found: C, 40.28; H, 3.68; N, 18.35 wt%. IR/cm−1 (KBr): 3,129 (m), 1,600 (s), 1,517 (m), 1,398 (m), 1,339 (s), 1,297 (w), 1,231 (w), 1,110 (m), 1,094 (w), 1,041 (w), 952 (m), 843 (m), 786 (m), 759 (w), 656 (m), 627 (w), 521 (w).

4.2 X-ray crystallography

X-ray diffraction analysis of single crystal 1 was performed on a Rigaku RAXIS-RAPID diffractometer equipped with a graphite monochromator (MoKα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å) at 296(2) K. The structure was solved by direct methods using SIR2014 [32] and refined by the full-matrix least-squares technique on F2 using the SHELXL2015/3 program [33]. All H atoms were found using the generated calculations and the riding model, and the rest of the atoms were refined with anisotropic temperature parameters. Selected bond lengths and angles are listed in Table 1. Crystallographic characteristics, X-ray data, and structure refinement parameters for 1 are summarized in Table 3. The crystallographic data were deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC no. 2359903). Copies of this information can be obtained free of charge at www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk or from the CCDC (12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: 0044 1223 336 033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

Table 3

Crystalline data and refinement parameters for complex 1

Empirical formula C40H48N16O14Zn3
Formula weight 1,173.05
Crystal system Triclinic
Space group P 1 ¯
a (Å) 12.5612(6)
b (Å) 12.8928(7)
c (Å) 16.5488(8)
α (°) 105.5560(10)
β (°) 102.1930(10)
γ (°) 93.8170(10)
Volume (Å3) 2,501.9(2)
Z 2
D c (g·cm–3) 1.557
µ (mm–1) 1.506
F(000) 1,204
θ range (°) 2.761 to 25.000
Crystal size (mm) 0.150 × 0.120 × 0.100
Total reflections 8,718
Unique reflections, R int 16,234, 0.0238
GOF on F 2 1.038
R 1 indices [I > 2σ(I)] 0.0424
wR 2 indices (all data) 0.1200
ρ min, ∆ρ max (e·Å–3) –0.901, 1.583
CCDC No. 2,359,903
  1. Funding information: The authors are grateful for the support through the Science and Technology Research Project from the Education Department of Jilin Province (No. JJKH20210541KJ) and the Graduate Innovation Program of Jilin Normal University (No. 202030).

  2. Author contributions: Xiumei Li: writing – original draft and experimental work; Yanju Huang: writing – original draft, data curation, and visualization; Bo Liu: experimental work and software; Xiuyan Wang: writing – review and editing, validation, and supervision.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Eddaoudi M, Moler DB, Li HL, Chen BL, Reineke TM, O’Keeffe M, et al. From molecules to crystal engineering: supramolecular isomerism and polymorphism in network solids modular chemistry: secondary building units as a basis for the design of highly porous and robust metal-organic carboxylate frameworks. Acc Chem Res. 2001;34(4):319–30.10.1021/ar000034bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Li HL, Eddaoudi M, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal organic framework. Nature. 1999;402:276–9.10.1038/46248Search in Google Scholar

[3] Feltham HLC, Brooker S. Review of purely 4f and mixed-metal nd-4f single-molecule magnets containing only one lanthanide ion. Coord Chem Rev. 2014;276:1–33.10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.011Search in Google Scholar

[4] Wang HL, Wang X, Li MM, Feng JD. Two new Zn(II) coordination polymers incorporating 2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline: Synthesis and structure. Main Group Met Chem. 2024;47:20230033.10.1515/mgmc-2023-0033Search in Google Scholar

[5] Cui JW, Hou SX, Li YH, Cui GH. A multifunctional Ni(II) coordination polymer: synthesis, crystal structure and applications as a luminescent sensor, electrochemical probe, and photocatalyst. Dalton Trans. 2017;46(48):16911–24.10.1039/C7DT03874GSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Gao Q, Xu J, Bu XH. Recent advances about metal-organic frameworks in the removal of pollutants from wastewater. Coord Chem Rev. 2019;378:17–31.10.1016/j.ccr.2018.03.015Search in Google Scholar

[7] Yang DD, Liu Y, Li SS, Cheng L, Wang Y, Zhang YX, et al. Ligand-rearrangement-induced transformation from a 3D supramolecular network to a discrete octanuclear cluster: a good detector for Pb2+ and Cr2O72−. ACS Omega. 2019;4(7):11493–9.10.1021/acsomega.9b00680Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Zhang JW, Kan XM, Liu BQ, Liu GC, Tian AX, Wang XL. Systematic investigation of reaction-time dependence of three series of copper-lanthanide/lanthanide coordination polymers: syntheses, structures, photoluminescence, and magnetism. Chem Eur J. 2015;21:16219–28.10.1002/chem.201502203Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Lee JY, Farha OK, Roberts J, Scheidt KA, Nguyen ST, Hupp JT. Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:1450–9.10.1039/b807080fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Qian J, Sun MM, Liu M, Gu W. Macromolecular probe based on a NiII/TbIII coordination polymer for sensitive recognition of human serum albumin (HSA) and MnO4−. ACS Omega. 2019;4(7):11949–59.10.1021/acsomega.8b03326Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Wang J, Gao LL, Zhang J, Zhao L, Wang XQ, Niu XY, et al. Syntheses, gas adsorption, and sensing properties of solvent-controlled Zn(II) pseudo-supramolecular isomers and Pb(II) supramolecular isomers. Cryst Growth Des. 2019;19(2):630–7.10.1021/acs.cgd.8b01077Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lv Y, Li XM, Huang YJ, Liu B, Zhou S. Synthesis, structure, and properties of zinc/ cadmium complexes based on succinic acid ligand. Chin J Inorg Chem. 2022;38(12):2511–20.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Fu LH, Li XM, Liu B, Zhou S. Two copper coordination polymers: crystal structure and quantum chemistry calculation. Chin J Inorg Chem. 2022;38(11):2249–58.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Li XM, Wang ZT, Pan YR, Wang QW, Liu B. Synthesis, crystal structure and theoretical calculations of two zinc, cobalt coordination polymers with 5-nitroisophthalic acid and 1,4-bis(1H-benzimidazolyl)butane ligands. J Inorg Organomet Polym. 2018;28:258–67.10.1007/s10904-017-0738-ySearch in Google Scholar

[15] Pan YR, Li XM, Ji JY, Wang QW. Synthesis, crystal structure, and theoretical calculations of two cobalt, nickel coordination polymers with 5-nitroisophthalic acid and bis(imidazol) ligands. Aust J Chem. 2016;69:1296–304.10.1071/CH16110Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kirchon A, Feng L, Drake HF, Joseph EA, Zhou HC. From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47(23):8611–38.10.1039/C8CS00688ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Fang WH, Yang GY. Induced aggregation and synergistic coordination strategy in cluster organic architectures. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51(11):2888–96.10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00346Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Fan LM, Zhang YJ, Liang JF, Wang XQ, Lv HX, Wang J, et al. Structural diversity, magnetic properties, and luminescence sensing of five 3D coordination polymers derived from designed 3,5-di(2΄,4΄-dicarboxylphenyl)benozoic acid. CrystEngComm. 2018;20(33):4752–62.10.1039/C8CE00877ASearch in Google Scholar

[19] Chen YM, Zheng LN, She SX, Chen Z, Hu B, Li YH. Two novel heterometallic CuII-SrII coordination polymers based on 3,5-pyrazoledicarboxylic acid: synthesis, crystal structures and magnetic properties. Dalton Trans. 2011;40(18):4970–5.10.1039/c1dt10034cSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Li YX, Zhang X, Xu P, Jiang ZM, Sun JM. The design of a novel and resistant Zn(PZDC)(ATZ) MOF catalyst for the chemical fixation of CO2 under solvent-free conditions. Inorg Chem Front. 2019;6(1):317–25.10.1039/C8QI01150HSearch in Google Scholar

[21] Fu LH, Li XM, Liu B, Zhou S. Two copper coordination polymers: crystal structure and quantum chemistry. Chin J Inorg Chem. 2020;36(12):249–2258.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Li XM, Yang JQ, Pan YR, Liu B, Zhou S. Syntheses, crystal structures and photoluminescent properties of two Co(II)/Cu(I) coordination polymers based on bis(imidazol) ligands. Chin J Inorg Chem. 2020;36(4):730–6.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Liu Y, Qi Y, Su YH, Zhao FH, Che YX, Zheng JM. Five novel cobalt coordination polymers: effect of metal-ligand ratio and structure characteristics of flexible bis(imidazole) ligands. CrystEngComm. 2010;12(10):3283–90.10.1039/b925829aSearch in Google Scholar

[24] Li XM, Huang YJ, Liu B, Pan YR. Syntheses, crystal structures and quantum chemistry calculation of two Ni(II) coordination polymers. Chin J Inorg Chem. 2024;40(10):2031–9.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Uddin MN, Ferdous T, Islam Z, SarwarJahan M, Quaiyyum MA. Development of chemometric model for characterization of non-wood by FT-NIR data. J Bioresour Bioprod. 2020;5(3):196–203.10.1016/j.jobab.2020.07.005Search in Google Scholar

[26] Wang XL, Mu B, Lin HY, Liu GC. Three new two-dimensional metal-organic coordination polymers derived from bis(pyridinecarboxamide)-1,4-benzene ligands and 1,3-benzenedicarboxylate: syntheses and electrochemical property. J Organomet Chem. 2011;696(11–12):2313–21.10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.12.009Search in Google Scholar

[27] Dolensky B, Konvalinka R, Jakubek M, Kral V. Identification of intramolecular hydrogen bonds as the origin of malfunctioning of multitopic receptors. J Mol Struct. 2013;1035:124–8.10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.09.040Search in Google Scholar

[28] McGarrah JE, Kim YJ, Hissler M, Eisenberg R. Toward a molecular photochemical device: A triad for photoinduced charge separation based on a platinum diimine bis(acetylide) chromophore. Inorg Chem. 2001;40(18):4510–1.10.1021/ic015559uSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Lin JD, Long XF, Lin P, Du SW. A series of cation-templated, polycarboxylate-based Cd(II) or Cd(II)/Li(I) frameworks with second-order nonlinear optical and ferroelectric properties. Cryst Growth Des. 2010;10(1):146–57.10.1021/cg9007476Search in Google Scholar

[30] Lin JG, Zang SQ, Tian ZF, Li YZ, Xu YY, Zhu HZ, et al. Metal-organic frameworks constructed from mixed-ligand 1,2,3,4-tetra-(4-pyridyl)-butane and benzene-polycarboxylate acids: syntheses, structures and physical properties. CrystEngComm. 2007;9(10):915–21.10.1039/b708389kSearch in Google Scholar

[31] Liu HY, Wu H, Ma JF, Liu YY, Liu B, Yang J. Syntheses, structures, and photoluminescence of zinc(II) coordination polymers based on carboxylates and flexible bis-[(pyridyl)-benzimidazole] ligands. Cryst Growth Des. 2010;10(11):4795–805.10.1021/cg100688zSearch in Google Scholar

[32] Burla MC, Caliandro R, Carrozzini B, Cascarano GL, Cuocci C, Giacovazzo C, et al. Crystal structure determination and refinement via SIR2014. J Appl Cryst. 2015;48(1):306–9.10.1107/S1600576715001132Search in Google Scholar

[33] Sheldrick GM. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr, Sect C: Struct Chem. 2015;71(1):3–8.10.1107/S2053229614024218Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2024-07-17
Accepted: 2024-10-17
Published Online: 2025-04-25

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mgmc-2024-0013/html
Scroll to top button