Home “Propping up” the “I,” or the discursive constitution of subjectivity: a multimodal discourse analysis of informal talk in a kindergarten classroom
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“Propping up” the “I,” or the discursive constitution of subjectivity: a multimodal discourse analysis of informal talk in a kindergarten classroom

  • Jason Ranker EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 3, 2024

Abstract

This article presents a multimodal discourse analysis of a discursive event involving three kindergarten children engaged in informal talk while writing and drawing in a classroom setting. My focus was to identify semiotic elements that indicated the children’s subjectivity as constituted in discourse. I thus characterize the focal students’ subjectivity not as an internal, pre-existing phenomenon that is brought to discourse, but, rather, as manifest in and realized as a discursive entity. From this perspective, subjectivity is thus understood as the possibility of becoming a subject of discourse: as a process of coming to create, participate in, and become affected by the unfolding discourse. Drawing upon theories of discourse developed by Émile Benveniste and Jacques Lacan, I mapped uses of the pronouns “I” and “you” as spoken signifiers that came into relation with discursive objects in the process of the multimodal constitution of subjectivity in discourse. This analysis adds to the conceptual development of the processes and significance of subjectivity in children’s multimodal discourse, as well as methodological approaches that suggest how multimodal discourse analysis can more explicitly incorporate subjectivity.


Corresponding author: Jason Ranker, Portland State University, 751, 1810 SW 5th Avenue, Portland, OR 97207, USA, E-mail:

References

Barthes, Roland. 1977. Elements of semiology. New York: Hill & Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1971. Problems in general linguistics. Miami, FL: University of Miami Press.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 2014. The formal apparatus of enunciation. In Johannes Angermuller, Dominique Maingeueneau & Ruth Wodak (eds.), The discourse studies reader: Main currents in theory and analysis, 141–145. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. (Original work published in 1970).Search in Google Scholar

Bezemer, Jeff & Diane Mavers. 2011. Multimodal transcription as academic practice: A social semiotic perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14(3). 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.563616.Search in Google Scholar

Cuéllar, David. 2010. From the conscious interior to an exterior unconscious: Lacan, discourse analysis, and social psychology. London: Karnac.Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Foucault. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1983/1916. Course in general linguistics. Chicago: Open Court.Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1981. Positions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Drew, Christopher. 2020. To follow a rule: The construction of student subjectivities on classroom rules charts. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 21(1). 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949118798207.Search in Google Scholar

Fink, Bruce. 1995. The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400885671Search in Google Scholar

Flewitt, Rosie. 2006. Using video to investigate preschool classroom interaction: Education research assumptions and methodological practices. Visual Communication 5(1). 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357206060917.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar

Glesne, Corrine. 2016. Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction, 5th edn. Boston: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Christian, Jon Hindmarsh & Paul Luff. 2010. Video in qualitative research. London: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Jewitt, Carey. 2007. A multimodal perspective on textuality and contexts. Pedagogy, Culture, & Society 15(3). 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360701601937.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther. 2011. Multimodal discourse analysis. In James Paul Gee & Michael Handford (eds.), Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Lacan, Jacques. 2002. Écrits: A selection (R. Grigg, Trans.). New York: W.W. Norton and Company. (Original work published in 1966).10.4324/9780203995839Search in Google Scholar

Lacan, Jacques. 2007. The seminar of Jacques Lacan, book three: The psychoses (R. Grigg, Trans.). New York: W.W. Norton and Company. (Original work published in 1991).Search in Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and socialist strategy, 2nd edn. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Levine, Philip & Ron Scollon. 2004. Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mavers, Diane. 2007. Semiotic resourcefulness: A young child’s email exchange as design. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 7(2). 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798407079285.Search in Google Scholar

Mavers, Diane. 2009a. Student text-making as semiotic work. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 9(2). 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798409105584.Search in Google Scholar

Mavers, Diane. 2009b. Teaching and learning with a visualiser in the primary classroom: Modeling graph-making. Learning, Media, and Technology 34(1). 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902759877.Search in Google Scholar

Merriam, Sharan. 2008. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Elizabeth. 2011. Performativity theory and language learning: Sedimentating, appropriating, and constituting language and subjectivity. Linguistics and Education 23. 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

Neill, Calum. 2011. Lacanian ethics and the assumption of subjectivity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230305038Search in Google Scholar

Neill, Calum. 2013. Breaking the text: An introduction to Lacanian discourse analysis. Theory & Psychology 23(3). 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354312473520.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Sigrid. 2004. Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203379493Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Sigrid. 2016. Concepts in multimodal discourse analysis with examples from video conferencing. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting 2. 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1515/yplm-2016-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Sigrid. 2019. Systematically working with multimodal data: Research methods in multimodal discourse analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9781119168355Search in Google Scholar

O’Halloran, Kay (ed.). 2004. Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, Ian. 2005. Lacanian discourse in psychology: Seven theoretical elements. Theory & Psychology 15(2). 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354305051361.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, Ian. 2010. Psychosocial studies: Lacanian discourse analysis negotiating interview text. Psychoanalysis, Culture, & Society 15(2). 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2009.21.Search in Google Scholar

Ranker, Jason. 2014. The emergence of semiotic resource complexes in the composing processes of young students in a literacy classroom context. Linguistics and Education 25. 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2013.10.002.Search in Google Scholar

Ranker, Jason. 2018a. The sliding of the signified: Multimodal sign operations in a youth-composed experimental digital video. Visual Communication 17(3). 337–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218763333.Search in Google Scholar

Ranker, Jason. 2018b. Uses of multimodal statements on the playground: A Foucaultian approach to multimodal discourse analysis. Social Semiotics 28(2). 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1278917.Search in Google Scholar

Ranker, Jason. 2019. Children’s sign-making and construction of signifying chains in relation to texts: Book interactions as discursive processes. Linguistics and Education 51. 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

Ranker, Jason. 2021. How to have fun with sticks, bowls, and colored water: Insights into multimodal signifier operations through Lacan’s four discourses. Multimodal Communication 10(2). 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2020-0006.Search in Google Scholar

Ranker, Jason. 2024. The operation of “différance” in a student-produced digital video: Insights into differing and deferring signifier operations and relations in multimodal discourse. Visual Communication 23(1). 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211044791.Search in Google Scholar

Watson, Karen. 2022. “I am big; he is little”: Interrogating the effects of developmental discourses among children in inclusive early childhood classrooms. International Journal of Early Years Education 30(2). 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2020.1814211.Search in Google Scholar

Youdell, Deborah. 2006. Diversity, inequality and a post-structural politics for education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 27(1). 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300500510252.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-08-02
Accepted: 2024-02-14
Published Online: 2024-04-03

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mc-2023-0036/pdf
Scroll to top button