Abstract
The following study integrates the concept of image schema with the idea of gestural metaphorical scenario, showing how image schematic properties of gestures feed into a pragmatically-oriented gestural metaphorical scenario distributed across different speakers. The study shows that a gestural metaphorical scenario of swearing is based on several image schemas: the cognitively primary object image schema, the source-path-goal image schema, showing the trajectory of movement of an imaginary object, and the blockage image schema, enacting the meaning of not being willing to accept an imaginary object into the speaker’s personal space, effectively leading to blocking its way. The proposed integration also lends more credence to the idea of a multilevel metaphor, where a single metaphor is treated as consisting of various elements at different levels of schematicity. Apart from that, the study shows that the straight image schema, visible in pointing gestures, is a scenario-independent conceptual element surfacing when people use gestures while swearing, projecting a way out of the speaker’s personal space.
References
Archer, Dane. 1997. Unspoken diversity: Cultural differences in gestures. Qualitative Sociology 20(1). 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024716331692.10.1023/A:1024716331692Search in Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2019. ‘Don’t say crap. Don’t use swear words.’ – Negotiating the use of swear/taboo words in the narrative mass media. Discourse, Context & Media 29. 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.02.002.Search in Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin K. 2019. Do gestures retain mental associations with their iconic origins, even after they become emblematic? An analysis of the middle-finger gesture among American English speakers. PLoS One 14(4). e0215633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215633.Search in Google Scholar
Bort-Mir, Lorena, Bolognesi Marianna & Susan Ghaffaryan. 2020. Cross-cultural interpretation of filmic metaphors: A think-aloud experiment. Intercultural Pragmatics 17(4). 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-4001.Search in Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana. 2021. Repetitions in gesture: A cognitive-linguistic and usage-based perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110697902Search in Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller. 2017. The “Negative-Assessment-Construction” – a multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture? Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160053. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0053.Search in Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana & Claudia Wegener. 2021. Handling talk: A cross-linguistic perspective on discursive functions of gestures in German and Savosavo. Gesture 20(2). 219–253. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19041.bre.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien, Hyunji Kim, Iris Hübscher & Bodo Winter. 2023a. Gestures are modulated by social context: A study of multimodal politeness across two cultures. Gesture 21 (2–3). 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.20034.bro.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien, Soung-U Kim & Hyunji Kim. 2023b. The embodied enactment of politeness metapragmatics. Journal of Politeness Research 19(1). 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2021-0033.Search in Google Scholar
Chui, Kawai. 2017. Entity metaphor, object gesture and context of use. Metaphor and Symbol 32(1). 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1272931.Search in Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan. 1998. Straight: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics 9. 107–194. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.2.107.Search in Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan. 2005. Image schemas and gesture. In Beate Hampe (ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics, 241–442. Berlin: Monton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197532.5.421Search in Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan. 2017. Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160048. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0048.Search in Google Scholar
Clausner, Thimothy C. & William Croft. 1999. Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10. 1–31.10.1515/cogl.1999.001Search in Google Scholar
Cooperrider, Kensy. 2014. Body-directed gestures: Pointing to the self and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics 71. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.003.Search in Google Scholar
Corts, Daniel & Howard Pollio. 1999. Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol 15(2). 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1402_1.Search in Google Scholar
Crowder, Elaine. 1996. Gestures at work in sense-making science talk. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 5(3). 173–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0503_2.Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert Malcom Ward. 2021. English prepositions. Their meanings and uses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198868682.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Dyrmo, Tomasz. 2022. Gestural metaphorical scenarios and coming out narratives. Metaphor and the Social World 12(1). 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.20023.dyr.Search in Google Scholar
Dyrmo, Tomasz. 2023. Metaphors of coming out in polish: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 24(1). 94–107. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2023-0007.Search in Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick. 2009. The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511576737Search in Google Scholar
Fabiszak, Małgorzata & Ewa Olszewska. 2018. Axiological ambivalence of conceptual imagery in visual communication: Commemoration architecture and 3D art. Language, Mind, Culture & Society 2018(2). 104–131.Search in Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren. 2021. ‘Away’ gestures associated with negative expressions in narrative discourse in Syuba (Kagate, Nepal) speakers. Semiotica 2021(239). 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0163.Search in Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew. 2007. Washing the brain. Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.23Search in Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 2015. “Swear words” and “curse words” in Australian (and American) English. At the crossroads of pragmatics, semantics and sociolinguistics. Intercultural Pragmatics 12(2). 189–218. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0010.Search in Google Scholar
Hampl, Marek. 2020. The use of the PATH and FORCE image schemas in Barack Obama’s counterterrorism discourse against ISIL. Critical Discourse Studies 19(3). 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1855220.Search in Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 2014. The organization of kinesic ensembles associated with negation. Gesture 14(2). 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.14.2.01har.Search in Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 2018. The impulse to gesture. Where language, minds and bodies intersect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108265065Search in Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon & Silva H. Ladewig. 2021. Recurrent gestures throughout bodies, languages, and cultural practices. Gesture 20(2). 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.21014.har.Search in Google Scholar
Hinnell, Jennifer. 2018. The multimodal marking of aspect: The case of five periphrastic auxiliary constructions in North American English. Cognitive Linguistics 29(4). 773–806. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0009.Search in Google Scholar
Jay, Timothy B. 1992. Cursing in America. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.57Search in Google Scholar
Jay, Timothy & Kristin Janschewitz. 2008. The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 4(2). 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2008.013.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1989. The body and the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.2307/431155Search in Google Scholar
Kamunen, Antti. 2018. Open Hand Prone as a resource in multimodal claims to interruption: Stopping a co-participant’s turn-at-talk. Gesture 17(2). 291–321. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.17002.kam.Search in Google Scholar
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid, Jiehui Hu, Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos & Danyal Farsani. 2023. The impact of gestural representation of metaphor schema on metaphor comprehension. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59(1). 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2022-1056.Search in Google Scholar
Koppenhoff, Hermann & Cornelia Mueller. 2011. Embodied meaning construction. Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and feature film. Metaphor and the Social World 2011(1–2). 121–153.10.1075/msw.1.2.02kapSearch in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2017. Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28(2). 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0052.Search in Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2020. Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108859127Search in Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silva H. 2014. 121. The cyclic gesture. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Handbooks of linguistics and communication science, 1605–1618. Berlin: Monton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110302028.1605Search in Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silva H. 2020. Integrating gestures: The dimension of multimodality in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110668568Search in Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silva H. & Jana. Bressem. 2013. New insights into the medium hand: Discovering recurrent structures in gestures. Semiotica 2013(197). 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0088.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1990. The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 39–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39.Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2013. Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0005Search in Google Scholar
Ljung, Magnus. 2011. Swearing: A cross-cultural linguistic study. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230292376Search in Google Scholar
Martiniec, Radan. 2004. Gestures that co-occur with speech as a systematic resource: The realization of experiential meanings in indexes. Social Semiotics 14(2). 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/1035033042000238259.Search in Google Scholar
Matsumoto, David & Hyisung C. Hwang. 2013. Cultural similarities and differences in emblematic gestures. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 37(1). 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-012-0143-8.Search in Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony. 2006. Swearing in English: Bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Zhonghua Xiao. 2004. Swearing in modern British English: The case of fuck in the BNC. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 13(3). 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947004044873.Search in Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene. 2017. Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160047. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0047.Search in Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar
Nelson, Max. 2017. Insulting middle-finger gestures among ancient Greeks and Romans. Phoenix 71(1/2). 66–88. https://doi.org/10.7834/phoenix.71.1-2.0066.Search in Google Scholar
Nowakowski, E. Adam. 2020. “Horns Up!” The horned hand as the emblematic gesture of the metal subculture. Tetrium Linguistic Journal 5(2). 62–80. https://doi.org/10.7592/tertium2020.5.2.nowakowski.Search in Google Scholar
Peña, Ma Sandra. 2008. Dependency systems for image-schematic patterns in a usage-based approach to language. Journal of Pragmatics 40(6). 1041–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.001.Search in Google Scholar
Rose, H. A. 1919. The language of gesture. Folklore 30(4). 312–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587x.1919.9719112.Search in Google Scholar
Schröder, Ulrike. 2015. Society and culture as container: (Re-)drawing borders and their metaphorical foundation from a communicative and extracommunicative point of view. International Journal of Language and Culture 2(1). 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.2.1.02sch.Search in Google Scholar
Schröder, Ulrike. 2017. Multimodal metaphors as cognitive pivots for the construction of cultural otherness in talk. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(4). 493–524. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0023.Search in Google Scholar
Schröder, Ulrike & Jürgen Streeck. 2022. Cultural concept, movement, and way of life: Jeitinho in words and gestures. Intercultural Pragmatics 19(4). 427–457. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2022-4001.Search in Google Scholar
Sekine, Kazuki, Gale Stam, Keiko Yoshioka, Marion Tellier & Olga Capirci. 2015. Cross-linguistic views on gesture usage. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2015(2). 91–105.Search in Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard. 2017. Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenents, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(1). 1–14.10.1515/ip-2017-0001Search in Google Scholar
Stevens, Paul & Harrison, Simon. 2017. Spectrums of thought in gesture. Pragmatics and Cognition 24(3). 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17024.ste.Search in Google Scholar
Szwedek, Aleksander. 2014. The nature of domains and the relationships between them in metaphorization. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 342–374. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.12.2.04szw.Search in Google Scholar
Szwedek, Aleksander. 2022. Thematic roles in image schemas: A missing link between mind and language. Cognitive Semantics 8(1). 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10024.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Robert F. 2019. The source-path-goal image schema in gestures for thinking and teaching. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17(2). 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00041.wil.Search in Google Scholar
Woodin, Greg, Bodo Winter, Marcus Perlman, Jeanette Littlemore & Teenie Matlock. 2020. ‘Tiny numbers’ are actually tiny: Evidence from gestures in the TV News Archive. PLoS One 15(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242142.Search in Google Scholar
Zavko, Dinković Irena & Gros, Linda. 2018. Spatial minds: Conceptual correlations of spatial prepositions in Hungarian, Croatian and English. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- A multimodal analysis of Bob Marley’s “Natty Dread” album
- Stance and food activism on Arabic Twitter (X): a multimodal analysis
- Image schemas in gestural metaphorical scenarios of swearing
- Enabling participation in joint drumming within organizational workshops
- “Propping up” the “I,” or the discursive constitution of subjectivity: a multimodal discourse analysis of informal talk in a kindergarten classroom
- Tattoos as multimodal semiotic assemblages
- The EU and environmental education: a multimodal ecological discourse analysis
- A multimodal translation analysis of online app advertisements: the case of Careem as a Taxi-sharing app in Iraq
- Representing slavery in visual art: a multimodal approach
- Leaving one’s mark: self-authorized commemorative practices in a rural semiotic landscape
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- A multimodal analysis of Bob Marley’s “Natty Dread” album
- Stance and food activism on Arabic Twitter (X): a multimodal analysis
- Image schemas in gestural metaphorical scenarios of swearing
- Enabling participation in joint drumming within organizational workshops
- “Propping up” the “I,” or the discursive constitution of subjectivity: a multimodal discourse analysis of informal talk in a kindergarten classroom
- Tattoos as multimodal semiotic assemblages
- The EU and environmental education: a multimodal ecological discourse analysis
- A multimodal translation analysis of online app advertisements: the case of Careem as a Taxi-sharing app in Iraq
- Representing slavery in visual art: a multimodal approach
- Leaving one’s mark: self-authorized commemorative practices in a rural semiotic landscape