Multimodal arguments: language, script, and politics

References

Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1). 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38.Search in Google Scholar

Amahan, Ali. 1994. Notes Bibliographiques sur les Manuscrits en Langue Tamazight Écrits en Caractères Arabes. In Ahmed-Chouqui Binebine (ed.), Le Manuscrit Arabe et la Codicologie: Colloques et Seminaires, vol. 33. Rabat: Faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines.Search in Google Scholar

al-Sahifa Newspaper. 2002. Al-Sahifa, Issue 47. http://www.ndaworld.org/uploads/Jamal_amazegeyah.doc (accessed 15 July 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Belhiah, Hassan. 2020. English as a global language in Morocco: A qualitative study of students’ motivations for studying English. In Hassan Belhiah, Nourdin Bejjit, Jamal Bahmad, Ikbal Zeddari & Nourddine Amrous (eds.), English language teaching in Moroccan higher education, 33–48. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-3805-6_3Search in Google Scholar

Ben-Layashi, Samir. 2007. Secularism in the Moroccan Amazigh discourse. The Journal of North African Studies 12(2). 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629380701201741.Search in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2004. Language and identity. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 268–294. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2016. Embodied sociolinguistics. In Nikolas Coupland (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 173–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009Search in Google Scholar

Chakrani, Brahim. 2013. The impact of the ideology of modernity on language attitudes in Morocco. The Journal of North African Studies 18(3). 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2013.791613.Search in Google Scholar

Chakrani, Brahim. 2017. Between profit and identity: Analyzing the effect of language of instruction in predicting overt language attitudes in Morocco. Applied Linguistics 38(2). 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv013.Search in Google Scholar

Cline, Walter. 1953. Berber dialects and Berber script. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 9(3). 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.9.3.3628698.Search in Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 2009. Evaluating merit—the evolution of writing reconsidered. Writing Systems Research 1(1). 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp001.Search in Google Scholar

De Haas, Hein. 2007. Morocco’s migration experience: A transitional perspective. International Migration 45(4). 39–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2007.00419.x.Search in Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 1997. Linguistic anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810190Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 4. 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Donald G. 2015. Argument discourse. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi022.Search in Google Scholar

Ennahid, Said. 2011. Information and communication technologies for the preservation and valorization of manuscript collections in Morocco. In Graziano Krätli & Ghislaine Lydon (eds.), The trans-Saharan book trade: Manuscript culture, Arabic literacy and intellectual history in Muslim Africa, 265–289. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004187429.i-424.56Search in Google Scholar

Ennaji, Moha. 2005. Multilingualism, cultural identity, and education in Morocco. New York, NY: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Errihani, Mohammed. 2007. Language policy in Morocco: Implications of recognizing and teaching Berber. University of Illinois at Chicago PhD diss.Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15. 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702.Search in Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest. 1972. Patterns of rural rebellion in Morocco during the early years of independence. In Charles Micaud & Ernest Gellner (eds.), Arabs and Berbers: From tribe to nation in North Africa, 361–374. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Footing. In Erving Goffman (ed.), Forms of talk, 124–159. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Good, Jeffrey S. 2015. Reported and enacted actions: Moving beyond reported speech and related concepts. Discourse Studies 17(6). 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615602349.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1986. Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text & Talk 6. 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1986.6.3.283.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32. 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00096-x.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2002. Time in action. Current Anthropology 43. 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/339566.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2007. Environmentally coupled gestures. In Susan Duncan, Justine Cassel & Elena Levy (eds.), Gestures and the dynamic dimensions of language, 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.1.18gooSearch in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2013. The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1). 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2015. Narrative as talk-in-interaction. In Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou (eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis, 197–218. Malden: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118458204.ch10Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & John Heritage. 1990. Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 19. 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1990. He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1996. Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In Yrjo Engeström & David Middleton (eds.), Cognition and communication at work, 61–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University.10.1017/CBO9781139174077.004Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2006. The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status, and exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470773567Search in Google Scholar

Hachimi, Atiqa. 2012. The urban and the urbane: Identities, language ideologies, and Arabic dialects in Morocco. Language in Society 41(3). 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404512000279.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Christian. 1986. Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511628221Search in Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 1996. Learning to navigate. In Seth Chaiklin & Jean Lave (eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, 35–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625510.003Search in Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith. 1996. When talk isn’t cheap. In Donald Brenneis & Ronald Macaulay (eds.), The matrix of language, 258–283. Boulder: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kimura, Daisuke & Suresh Canagarajah. 2020. Embodied semiotic resources in Research Group Meetings: How language competence is framed. Journal of Sociolinguistics 24(5). 634–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12435.Search in Google Scholar

Kolarz, Walter. 1972. Myths and realities in Eastern Europe. Port Washington, N.Y.: Kennikat Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kroskrity, Paul V. 2010. Language ideologies-evolving perspectives. In Jürgen Jaspers (ed.), Society and language use (Handbook of pragmatics highlights), 192–211. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hoph.7.13kroSearch in Google Scholar

Kroskrity, Paul V. 2018. On recognizing persistence in the indigenous language ideologies of multilingualism in two native American communities. Language & Communication 62. 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.012.Search in Google Scholar

Laihonen, Petteri. 2008. Language ideologies in interviews: A conversation analysis approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(5). 668–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00387.x.Search in Google Scholar

Maybin, Janet. 2001. Language, struggle and voice: The Bakhtin/Volosinov writings. In Discourse theory and practice: A reader, 64–71. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations. Food Quality and Preference 20(8). 558–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.03.006.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Sigrid. 2004. Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203379493Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor, Carolyn Taylor, Dina Rudolph & Ruth Smith. 1992. Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes 15. 37–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544801.Search in Google Scholar

O’Connor, Michael. 1996. The Berber scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 112–116. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Prussin, Labelle. 1995. African nomadic architecture: Space, place and gender. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Search in Google Scholar

Rouighi, Ramzi. 2019. Inventing the Berbers: History and ideology in the maghrib. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812296181Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. In Gail Jefferson (ed.), Lectures on conversation, vol.2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sanctex. 2007. Map of Berber languages in Berber-map.png. http://www.oocities.org/linguaeimperii/Libyan/libyan_es.html (accessed 15 June 2012).Search in Google Scholar

Savage, Andrew. 2008. Writing Tuareg: The three script options. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 192. 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2008.031.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. A. 1997. ‘Narrative analysis’ thirty years after. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4). 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.11nar.Search in Google Scholar

Schieffelin, Bambi B. & Rachelle C. Doucet. 1998. The ‘real’ Haitian Creole: Ideology, metalinguistics, and orthographic choice. In Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard & Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 285–316. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195105612.003.0014Search in Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 2006. Ideology and alphabets in the former USSR. Language Problems and Language Planning 30(2). 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.30.2.02seb.Search in Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 2009. Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research. Writing Systems Research 1(1). 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp002.Search in Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 2018. Scripts, spelling, and identities. Brown Journal of World Affairs 25(1). 7–19.Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2000. Primus inter pares: Storytelling and male peer groups in an Indo-Guyanese rumshop. American Ethnologist 27(1). 72–99. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2000.27.1.72.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 2004. Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203594070Search in Google Scholar

Skarakis-Doyle, Elizabeth & Lisa L. Murphy. 1995. Discourse-based language intervention: Anefficacy study. Journal of Children’s Communication Development 17(2). 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/152574019501700202.Search in Google Scholar

Soulaimani, Dris. 2016. Writing and rewriting Amazigh/Berber identity: Orthographies and language ideologies. Writing Systems Research 8(1). 1–16.10.1080/17586801.2015.1023176Search in Google Scholar

Soulaimani, Dris. 2018. Talk, voice and gestures in reported speech: Toward an integrated approach. Discourse Studies 20(3). 361–376.10.1177/1461445618754419Search in Google Scholar

Soulaimani, Dris. 2019. Arabic or Latin: Language contact and spelling practices. Middle East Topics & Arguments (Contacts) 13. 13–20.Search in Google Scholar

Soulaimani, Dris. 2023. “Purement Amazigh”: Investigating embodied ideologies and linguistic practices in Morocco. Multiligua 42(5). 621–648.10.1515/multi-2022-0121Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Anya. 2004. ‘No no no’ and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30(2). 260–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00733.x.Search in Google Scholar

Unseth, Peter. 2005. Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language and Literacy 8. 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies 11(2). 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908.Search in Google Scholar

Vološinov, Valentin N. 1973 [1929]. Marxism and the Philosophy of language (trans. L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik). New York: Seminar Press.Search in Google Scholar

Woolard, Kathryn A. 2008. Why dat now?: Linguistic-anthropological contributions to the explanation of sociolinguistic icons and change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 432–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00375.x.Search in Google Scholar

Yokoyama, Olga. 1990. Responding with a question in colloquial Russian. In Margaret H. Mills (ed.), Topics in colloquial Russian, 1–16. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar