Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis for the study of lectures: active and passive uses of metadiscourse

References

Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia.10.1075/scl.24Search in Google Scholar

Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: a taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic english. Nordic J. Engl. Stud. 9: 69–97, https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.218.Search in Google Scholar

Aguilar-Pérez, M. and Khan, S. (2022). Metadiscourse use when shifting from L1 to EMI lecturing: implications for teacher training. Innovat. Lang. Learn. Teach. 16: 297–311, https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2057503.Search in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. (in press). Building successful communication in EMI contexts: a multimodal approach to organizational metadiscourse in intercultural lectures. Chin. J. Appl. Ling.Search in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. (2015). A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of linking metadiscursive elements in two opencourseware lectures (MOOCs). Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 212: 61–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.299.Search in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. (2017). Metadiscourse and topic introductions in an academic lecture: a multimodal insight. Multimodal Commun. 6: 39–60, https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2016-0030.Search in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. (2021). Combining multimodal techniques to approach the study of academic lectures: a methodological reflection. Atlantis 43: 178–198, https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2021-43.1.10.Search in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. (2022). Modal density in structuring segments containing organizational metadiscourse versus content sequences. ESP Today J. 10: 2–21, https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2019). Organizational metadiscourse across lecturing styles: engagement beyond language. In: Sancho-Guinda, C. (Ed.). Engagement in professional genres: deference and disclosure. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, pp. 321–340.10.1075/pbns.301.17berSearch in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. and Ruiz-Garrido, M.F. (2022). Fostering multimodal literacy in EME lecturers: a comparative analysis of metadiscourse as a multimodal guiding tool in English and in Spanish. In: 20th international AELFE conference. Communication in the academic, professional and political spheres during pandemic times, 14–15 Semptember 2022. Università Di Pisa.Search in Google Scholar

Carrió-Pastor, M.L. (2022). Teaching multimodal metadiscourse in academic English as a foreign language. Porta Linguarum 4: 155–172, https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi.21423.Search in Google Scholar

Costa, F. and Mair, O. (2022). Multimodality and pronunciation in ICLHE (integration of content and language in higher education) training. Innovat. Lang. Learn. Teach. 16: 281–296, https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2053130.Search in Google Scholar

Crawford-Camiciottoli, B. (2007). The Language of business studies lectures. A corpus-assisted analysis. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia.10.1075/pbns.157Search in Google Scholar

Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2015). Elaborating explanations during OpenCourseWare Humanities lectures: the interplay of verbal and nonverbal strategies. In: Crawford-Camiciottoli, B. and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (Eds.). Multimodal Analysis in academic settings: from Research to teaching. Routledge, New York, pp. 144–170.10.4324/9781315738758Search in Google Scholar

Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2016). A multimodal Analysis of Interaction in academic lectures: a case study. In: Bonsignori, V. and Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (Eds.). Multimodality across communicative settings, discourse domains and genres. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, pp. 65–92.Search in Google Scholar

Crawford Camiciottoli, B. and Bonsignori, V. (2015). The pisa audiovisual corpus project: a multimodal approach to ESP research and teaching. ESP Today 3: 139–159.Search in Google Scholar

Crawford Camiciottoli, B. and Campoy-Cubillo, M.C. (2018). Introduction: the nexus of multimodality, multimodal literacy, and English language teaching in research and practice in higher education settings. System 77: 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Dafouz, E. (2018). English-medium instruction and teacher education programmes in higher education: ideological forces and imagined identities at work. Int. J. Biling. Educ. BiLing. 21: 540–552, https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1487926.Search in Google Scholar

De Groot, E., Nickerson, C., Korzilius, H., and Gerritsen, M. (2016). Picture this: developing a model for the analysis of visual metadiscourse. J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 30: 165–201, https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651915620235.Search in Google Scholar

Doiz, A. and Lasagabaster, D. (2022). Looking into English-medium instruction teachers’ metadiscourse: an ELF perspective. System 105: 102730, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102730.Search in Google Scholar

Drajati, N.A., Tan, L., Haryati, S., Rochsantiningsih, D., and Zainnuri, H. (2018). Investigating English language teachers in developing TPACK and multimodal literacy. Indones. J. Appl. Linguist. 7: 575–582, https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9806.Search in Google Scholar

Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Variations in the discourse patterns favoured by different disciplines and their pedagogical implications. In: Flowerdew, J. (Ed.). Academic listening: research perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 146–158.10.1017/CBO9781139524612.012Search in Google Scholar

Fogarty-Bourget, C.G., Artemeva, N., and Fox, J. (2019). Gestural silence: an engagement device in the multimodal genre of the chalk talk lecture. In: Sancho Guinda, C. (Ed.). Engagement in professional genres: deference and disclosure. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, pp. 277–295.10.1075/pbns.301.15fogSearch in Google Scholar

Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2020). The dimensions of EMI in the international classroom: training teachers for the future University. In: Sánchez, M.M. (Ed.). Teacher training for english-medium instruction in higher education. IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania, pp. 1–20.10.4018/978-1-7998-2318-6.ch001Search in Google Scholar

Fortanet-Gómez, I. and Ruiz-Madrid, M.N. (2016). Multimodal humor in plenary lectures in English and in Spanish. Multimodal Commun. 5: 55–69, https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2016-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. Continuum, London, England.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge, London.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge, London, England.Search in Google Scholar

Lockee, B.B. (2021). Online education in the post-COVID era. Nat. Electron. 4: 5–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00534-0.Search in Google Scholar

Malavska, V. (2016). Genre of an academic lecture. LLCE 3: 56–84, https://doi.org/10.1515/llce-2016-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Morell, T. (2004). Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students. Engl. Specif. Purp. 23: 325–338, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(03)00029-2.Search in Google Scholar

Morell, T. (2020). EMI teacher training with a multimodal and interactive approach: a new horizon for LSP specialists. Language Value 12: 56–87, https://doi.org/10.6035/languagev.2020.12.4.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction. A methodological framework. Routledge, New York.10.4324/9780203379493Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2017). Scales of action: an example of driving and car talk in Germany and North America. Text Talk 37: 117–139, https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0040.Search in Google Scholar

O’Halloran, K. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In: Hyland, K. and Paltridge, B. (Eds.). Companion to discourse. Continuum, London, pp. 120–137.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Llantada, C. (2018). ELF and linguistic diversity in EAP writing pedagogy: academic biliteracy in doctoral education. In: Tatsioka, Z., Seidlhofer, B., Sifaki, N.C., and Ferguson, G. (Eds.). English in Europe - using english as a lingua franca in education in Europe. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, pp. 200–224.10.1515/9781501503115-010Search in Google Scholar

Pirini, J. (2015). Research into tutoring: exploring agency and intersubjectivity. Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.Search in Google Scholar

Querol-Julián, M. (2021). How does digital context influence interaction in large live online lectures? The case of English-medium instruction. Eur. J. Engl. Stud. 25: 299–317, https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1988265.Search in Google Scholar

Querol-Julián, M. and Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2019). The impact of online technologies and English medium instruction on university lectures in international learning contexts: a systematic review. ESP Today 7: 2–23, https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2019.7.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz-Garrido, M.F. and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (Forthcoming). A multimodal analysis of an Integrating content and language in higher education (ICLHE) lecture: multimodal ensembles in action. Routledge, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz-Madrid, M.N. and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2016). A model for a multimodal analysis of asides in conference plenary lectures. E-Aesla 2: 157–168.Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: the nexus of practice. Longman, London & New York.10.4324/9780203420065Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, S.V. and Leung, C.B. (2020). Multimodal literacy and social interaction: Young children’s literacy learning. Early Child. Educ. J. 48: 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00974-0.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, S.E. (2003). Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signaling of organization in academic lectures. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2: 5–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1475-1585(02)00036-x.Search in Google Scholar

Varó Alcaraz, E. (2000). El inglés profesional y académico. Alianza Editorial, Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

Waugh, G.H. and Waugh, R.F. (1999). The new technologies versus the lecture tradition in higher education: is change possible? Aust. J. Teach. Educ. 24: 35–51.10.14221/ajte.1999v24n1.3Search in Google Scholar

Young, L. (1994). University lectures - macro-structure and micro-features. In: Flowerdew, J. (Ed.). Academic listening: research perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 159–176.10.1017/CBO9781139524612.013Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, L. and Lo, Y.Y. (2021). EMI teachers’ use of interactive metadiscourse in lecture organisation and knowledge construction. In: Lasagabaster, D. and Doiz, A. (Eds.). Language use in English-medium instruction at university. International perspectives on teacher practice. Routledge, New York & London, pp. 56–79.10.4324/9781003134534-4Search in Google Scholar