Multimodal Humour: Integrating Blending Model, Relevance Theory, and Incongruity Theory

References

Abdel-Raheem, A. (2016). The JOURNEY metaphor and moral political cognition. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(3):373–401.10.1075/pc.22.3.06abdSuche in Google Scholar

Abdel-Raheem, A. (2017a). Decoding images: Toward a theory of pictorial framing. Discourse & Society, 28(4):327–352.10.1177/0957926517702978Suche in Google Scholar

Abdel-Raheem, A. (2017b). Can cartoons influence Americans’ attitudes toward bailouts? Visual Communication Quarterly, 24(3):174–187.10.1080/15551393.2016.1230472Suche in Google Scholar

Attardo, S. (2006). Cognitive linguistics and humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 19:341–362.10.4324/9781351034708-24Suche in Google Scholar

Attardo, S., and Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor, 4:293–348.10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293Suche in Google Scholar

Bergen, B. (2003). To awaken a sleeping giant: Political cartoons in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. In: Language, Culture, and Mind, M. Achard and S. Kemmer (Eds.), 2–12. Stanford: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar

Bing, J., and Scheibman, J. (2014). Blended spaces as subversive feminist humor. In: Gender and Humor: Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives, D. Chairo and R. Baccolini (Eds.), 13–29. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Burmeister, J. M., and Carels, R. A. (2014). Weight-related humor in the media: Appreciation, distaste, and anti-fat attitudes. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4):223–238.10.1037/ppm0000029Suche in Google Scholar

Carroll, P. J., Young, J. R., and Guertin, M. S. (1992). Visual analysis of cartoons: A view from the far side. In: Eye Movements and Visual Cognition: Scene Perception and Reading, K. Rayner (Ed.), 444–461. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-2852-3_27Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539Suche in Google Scholar

Cohn, N., Murthy, B., and Foulsham, T. (2016). Meaning above the head: Combinatorial constraints on the visual vocabulary of comics. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(5):559–574.10.1080/20445911.2016.1179314Suche in Google Scholar

Coulson, S. (1996). The Menendez brothers virus: Analogical mapping in blended spaces. In: Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, A. E. Goldberg (Ed.), 67–81. Palo Alto: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar

Coulson, S. (1997). Semantic Leaps: The role of frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. (Doctoral thesis). UC San Diego.Suche in Google Scholar

Coulson, S. (2001a). What’s so funny? Conceptual blending in humorous examples. Downloadable at http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~coulson/funstuff/funny.htmlSuche in Google Scholar

Coulson, S. (2001b). Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511551352Suche in Google Scholar

Coulson, S. (2003). Reasoning and rhetoric: Conceptual blending in political and religious rhetoric. In: Research and Scholarship in Integration Processes, E. Oleksy and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Eds.), 59–88. Lodz, Poland: Lodz University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Coulson, S. (2005a). What’s so funny? Cognitive semantics and jokes. Cognitive Psychopathology/Psicopatologia Cognitive, 2(3):67–78.Suche in Google Scholar

Coulson, S. (2005b). Extemporaneous blending: Conceptual integration in humorous discourse from talk radio. Style, 39(107–1):22.Suche in Google Scholar

Coulson, S. (2005c). Sarcasm and the space structuring model. In: The Literal and the Nonliteral in Language and Thought, S. Coulson and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Eds.), 129–144. Berlin: Peter Lang. Retrieved from (pp. 1–14). http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~coulson/spaces/coulson-sarc.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Coulson, S., Urbach, P., and Kutas, M. (2006). Looking back: Joke comprehension and the space structuring model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 19(3):229–250 Downloadable at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.381.1013&rep=rep1&type=pdf10.1515/HUMOR.2006.013Suche in Google Scholar

Coulson, S., and Williams, F. (2004). Hemispheric asymmetries and joke comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 43(1):128–41. Downloadable at 1–14: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e845/55cc028044e53ea3415ee626dc80db6fd5b1.pdf10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.03.015Suche in Google Scholar

Deckers, L. (1993). On the validity of a weight-judging paradigm for the study of humor. Humor, 6:43–56.10.1515/humr.1993.6.1.43Suche in Google Scholar

Dynel, M. (2009). Humorous Garden-Paths: A Pragmatic-Cognitive Study. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Dynel, M. (2011). Blending the incongruity-resolution model and the conceptual integration theory: The case of blends in pictorial advertising. International Review of Pragmatics, 3:59–83. doi:10.1163/187731011X561009.Suche in Google Scholar

Dynel, M. (2013). When does irony tickle the hearer? Towards capturing the characteristics of humorous irony. In: Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, M. Dynel (Ed.), 298–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.1Suche in Google Scholar

El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2(1):75–95. doi:10.1177/1470357203002001755.Suche in Google Scholar

El Refaie, E. (2005). “Our purebred ethnic compatriots”: Subversive irony in newspaper journalism. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(6):781–797.10.1016/j.pragma.2004.10.017Suche in Google Scholar

El Refaie, E. (2009a). What makes us laugh? verbo-visual humour in newspaper cartoons. In: The World Told and the World Shown: Multisemiotic Issues, E. Ventola and A. J. M. Guijarro (Eds.), 75–89. London; New York: Palgrave.Suche in Google Scholar

El Refaie, E. (2009b). Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In: Multimodal Metaphor, C. Forceville and U.-E. Aparisi (Eds.), 173–196. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

El Refaie, E. (2011). The pragmatics of humor reception: Young people’s responses to a newspaper cartoon. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 24(1):87–108. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2011.005.Suche in Google Scholar

El-Bendary, M. (2010). The Egyptian Press and Coverage of Local and International Events. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental spaces. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G. (1999). Methods and generalizations. In: Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology, T. Janssen and G. Redeker (Eds.), 95–127. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110803464.95Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. (2003). Conceptual blending, form and meaning. Recherches En Communication: Sémiotique Cognitive, 19:57–86.10.14428/rec.v19i19.48413Suche in Google Scholar

Feyaerts, K., and Brône, G. (2002). Humor through ‘double grounding: Structural interaction of optimality principles. In: The Way We Think: A Research Symposium on Conceptual Integration and the Nature and Origin of Cognitively Modern Human Beings (Odense, Denmark, August 19–23, 2002). Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication, Vol. I And II, A. Hougaard and S. N. Lund (Eds.), 313–336. Odense: Odense University, Institute of Language and Communication.Suche in Google Scholar

Forabosco, G. (1992). Cognitive aspects of the humour process: The concept of incongruity. Humor, 5:9–26.10.1515/humr.1992.5.1-2.45Suche in Google Scholar

Forabosco, G. (2008). Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research? Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4:45–62.10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5Suche in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (2005). Addressing an audience: Time, place, and genre in Peter Van Straaten’s calendar cartoons. Humor, 18(3): 247–278.Suche in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203272305Suche in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (2004). Review of Fauconnier and Turner (2002). Metaphor and Symbol, 19:83–89.10.1207/S15327868MS1901_5Suche in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (2011). Pictorial runes in Tintin and the Picaros. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3):875–890. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.014.Suche in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (2014). Relevance theory as a model for multimodal communication. In: Visual Communication, D. Machin (Ed.), 51–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110255492.51Suche in Google Scholar

Forceville, C., and Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Introduction. In: Multimodal Metaphor, C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), 3–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366Suche in Google Scholar

Ghazal, R. (2015, July 23). An Eid anthem from the 1980s is enjoying a new lease of life. The National. Retrieved from http://www.thenational.ae/arts-lifestyle/the-review/an-eid-anthem-from-the-1980s-is-enjoying-a-new-lease-of-lifeSuche in Google Scholar

Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the Brain: The Hidden Ideology of Metaphor. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.23Suche in Google Scholar

Gray, W. A. (2015). Kushy Koala and his mates in Japan. Bloomington, Ind.: Xlibris.Suche in Google Scholar

Greenberg, B. S., Eastin, M., Hofschire, L., Lachlan, K., and Brownell, K. D. (2003). Portrayals of overweight and obese individuals on commercial Television.”. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8):1342–1348.10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1342Suche in Google Scholar

Hofstadter, D., and Gabora, L. (1989). Synopsis of the workshop on humor and cognition. Humor, 2:417–440.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Kapferer, J. (2002). Corporate brand and organizational identity. In: Corporate and Organizational Identities: Integrating Strategy, Marketing, Communication and Organizational Perspectives, B. Moingeon and G. Soenen (Eds.), 175–193. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203361726.ch9Suche in Google Scholar

Keith-Spiegel, P. (1972). Early conceptions of humour: Varieties and issues. In: The Psychology of Humour, J. Goldstein and P. McGhee (Eds.), 3–39. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50007-9Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, M., Green, D., and Vervaeke, J. (1993). Metaphoric thought and devices in pictures. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8(3):243–255.10.1207/s15327868ms0803_9Suche in Google Scholar

Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson.Suche in Google Scholar

Koller, V. (2009). Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In: Multimodal Metaphor, C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 45–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Laineste, L. (2002). Take it with a grain of salt: The kernel of truth in topical jokes. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore, 21:7–25.10.7592/FEJF2002.21.jokesSuche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st century politics with an 18th century brain. New York, NY: Viking.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

MacAskill, E., and Chulov, M. (2014, October 22). Isis apparently takes control of US weapons airdrop intended for Kurds. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/22/isis-us-airdrop-weapons-pentagonSuche in Google Scholar

Marín-Arrese, J. (2008). Cognition and culture in political cartoons. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5:1–18.10.1515/IP.2008.001Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, R. (2007). The Psychology of Humor. An Integrative Approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.Suche in Google Scholar

Morreall, J. (1983). Taking Laughter Seriously. Albany: State University of New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Morreall, J. (1989). Enjoying incongruity. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 2(1):1–18.10.1515/humr.1989.2.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

Nazemroaya, M. (2006, November 18). Plans for redrawing the Middle East: The project for a “New Middle East.” Global Research. Retrieved from http://www.globalresearch.ca/plans-for-redrawing-the-middle-east-the-project-for-a-new-middle-east/3882Suche in Google Scholar

Niemeier, S. (2003). Straight from the heart: Metonymic and metaphorical explorations. In: Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, A. Barcelona (Ed.), 195–214. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110894677.195Suche in Google Scholar

O’Connor, F. (2009). Obesity and the Media. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

Pagán Cánovas, C., and Turner, M. (2016). Generic integration templates for fictive communication. In: The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction, E. Pascual and S. Sandler (Eds.), 45–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.55.03pagSuche in Google Scholar

Partington, A. (2006). The Linguistics of Laughter: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. Oxon: Routledge Studies in Linguistics.10.4324/9780203966570Suche in Google Scholar

Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Rotello, M., and Stewart, J. (2011). Integrating text and pictorial information: Eye movements when looking at print advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3):219–226.10.1037/1076-898X.7.3.219Suche in Google Scholar

Ritchie, G. (2004). The Linguistic Analysis of Jokes. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203406953Suche in Google Scholar

Rothbart, M. K. (1976). Incongruity, problem-solving and laughter. In: Humor and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications, A. J. Chapman and H. C. Foot (Eds.), 37–54. New York: Wiley and Sons.Suche in Google Scholar

Ruch, W. (1992). Assessment of appreciation of humor: Studies with the 3WD humor test. In: Advances in Personality Assessment, Vol. 9, C. Spielberger and J. Butcher (Eds.), 27–75. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Ruch, W. (2008). Psychology of humor. In: The Primer of Humor Research, V. Raskin (Ed.), 17–100. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gryuter.10.1515/9783110198492.17Suche in Google Scholar

Ruch, W., and Hehl, F. J. (1998). A two-mode model of humor appreciation: Its relation to aesthetic appreciation and simplicity-complexity of personality. In: The Sense of Humor: Explorations of a Personality Characteristic, W. Ruch (Ed.), 109–142. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110804607.109Suche in Google Scholar

Scott, B. (2004). Picturing irony: The subversive power of photography. Visual Communication, 3(1):31–59.10.1177/1470357204039597Suche in Google Scholar

Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance Theory: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance Theory: Communication and Cognition. 2nd. Blackwell: Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Suls, J. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information processing analysis. In: The Psychology of Humor, J. Goldstein and P. McGhee (Eds.), 81–100. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50010-9Suche in Google Scholar

Suls, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in humour appreciation. In: Handbook of Humour Research, Vol. 1, P. McGhee and J. Goldstein (Eds.), 39–57. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_3Suche in Google Scholar

Turner, M. (2001). Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Watson, S. (2014, November, 18). Iraqi intelligence: USA is supplying ISIS with weapons, food. Infowars. Retrieved from http://www.infowars.com/iraqi-intelligence-usa-is-supplying-isis-with-weapons-food/Suche in Google Scholar

Wilson, D., and Sperber, D. (2012). Explaining irony. In: Meaning and Relevance, D. Wilson and D. Sperber (Eds.), 123–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008Suche in Google Scholar

Yus, F. (2003). Humour and the search for relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9):1295–1331.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00179-0Suche in Google Scholar

Yus, F. (2006). Inferring from comics: A multi-stage account. In: El Discurs Del Còmic (Quaderns De Filologia, Estudis De Comunicació, Vol. III), P. Sancho Cremades, C. Gregori Signes and S. Renard (eds.), 223–249. València: Universitat de València.Suche in Google Scholar

Yus, F. (2016). Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.4Suche in Google Scholar