The Participatory Stance of the White House on Facebook: A Critical Multimodal Analysis

References

Askehave, I. and Ellerup Nielsen, A. (2005). Digital genres: A challenge to traditional genre theory. Information Technology and People, 3:120–141.10.1108/09593840510601504Search in Google Scholar

Attebery, B. (1996). American studies: A not so unscientific method. American Quarterly, 48:316–343.10.1353/aq.1996.0012Search in Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford UP.Search in Google Scholar

Barna, W. D. (2008). The Asian Influence on Hollywood Action Films. Jefferson (NC): McFarland & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, J. D. (1988, August 29). Unicode 88. http://www.unicode.org/history/unicode88.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Bernstein, B. (1990). The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse: Class, Codes and Control. Volume IV. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D. and Conrad, S. (2000). Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In: Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, S. Hunston and G. Thompson (Eds.), 56–73. New York: Oxford UP.Search in Google Scholar

Brand, S. (1972, December 7), Spacewar: Fanatic life and symbolic death among the computer bums. Rolling Stone. http://digitizingamerica.shanti.virginia.edu/sites/shanti.virginia.edu.digitizingamerica/files/SPACEWAR%20-%20by%20Stewart%20Brand.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Brand, S. (1995, March 1). We Owe it All to the Hippies. Forget Antiwar Protests, Woodstock, even Long Hair. The Real Legacy of the Sixties Generation is the Computer Revolution. Time Magazine. http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,982602,00.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. (2014). Analyzing Political Speeches. Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave-McMillan.10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1Search in Google Scholar

Coleman, G. E. (2013). Coding Freedom. the Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton/ Oxford: Princeton UP.10.1515/9781400845293Search in Google Scholar

de Crevecoeur, St. John H. (1792). Letter from an American Farmer, Letter III “What is an American”. http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/CREV/letter03.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Douglas, M. (1975). Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Djonov, E., Zhao S. (Eds.), (2014). Critical Multimodal Studies of Popular Discourse. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203104286Search in Google Scholar

Eisenlauer, V. (2013). A Critical Hypertext Analysis of Social Media: The True Colours of Facebook. London/New York: Continuum. Kindle Version.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London/New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and Globalization. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203593769Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (2010). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In: Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, N. Fairclough (Ed.), 230–254. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In: Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez (Eds.), 379–402. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197761.5.379Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (2008). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In: Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric, E. F. McQuarrie and B. J. Phillips (Eds.), 178–204. Armonk NY: ME Sharpe.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1974). An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, S. (1986). Variants of liberalism. In: Politics and Ideology: A Reader, J. Donald and S. Hall (Eds.), 34–69. Milton Keynes, UK: Open UP.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotics. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994 [1985]). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London/ New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (2007 [1975]). Language as social semiotic: Towards a general sociolinguistic theory. In: Language and Society. vol. 10, J. J. Webster (Ed.), 169–201. London/ New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Geelong: Deakin UP; Oxford: Oxford UP.Search in Google Scholar

Hart, C. (2008). Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: Towards a theoretical framework. Critical Discourse Studies, 5(2):91–106.10.1080/17405900801990058Search in Google Scholar

Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1993 [1979]). Language as Ideology. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1994 [1977]). Towards ethnographies of communication. In: Language and Literacy in Social Practice: A Reader, J. Maybin (Ed.), 11–22. Avon: The Open UP.Search in Google Scholar

Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1):29–57.10.1177/1470357203002001751Search in Google Scholar

Isaacson, W. (2014). The Innovators. How a Group of Hackers, Geniuses and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, H. (2010). Ted Talk. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFCLKa0XRlwSearch in Google Scholar

Koller, V. (2005). Critical discourse analysis and social cognition: Evidence from business media discourse. Discourse & Society, 16(2):199–224.10.1177/0957926505049621Search in Google Scholar

Konzack, L. (2006). Geek culture: The 3rd counter culture. In: Proceedings of the Inaugural Fun ‘N’ Games Conference, 71–78. London: Preston.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3):299–325.10.1177/147035720200100303Search in Google Scholar

Levy, S. (1984). Hackers. Heroes of the Computer Revolution. Anchor: Doubleday. Kindle Version.Search in Google Scholar

Lipsitz, G. (1990). Listening to learn and learning to listen: Popular culture, cultural theory and american studies. American Quarterly, 42:616–617.10.2307/2713167Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Y. and O’Halloran, K. L. (2009). Intersemiotic texture: Analyzing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics, 19(4):367–388.10.1080/10350330903361059Search in Google Scholar

Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2012). How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. Los Angeles/London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Machin, D. (2013). What is multimodal critical discourse studies?. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4):347–355.10.1080/17405904.2013.813770Search in Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1994 [1923]). The problem of meaning in primitive language. In: Language and Literacy in Social Practice: A Reader, J. Maybin (Ed.), 1–10. Avon: The Open UP.Search in Google Scholar

Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. London/ Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Martinec, R. and Salway, A. (2005). A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, 4(3):337–371.10.1177/1470357205055928Search in Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. and White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave McMillan.10.1057/9780230511910Search in Google Scholar

Moschini, I. (2007). Brave New Edens. In: Cityscapes: Islands of the Self, Volume 2, Language Studies, G. Del Lungo, L. Jottini and J. Douthwaite (Eds.), 253–267. Cagliari: CUEC.Search in Google Scholar

Moschini, I. (2010). Race 2.0 or the ‘webridization’ of electoral discourse. Il Politico, 75(2):133–161.Search in Google Scholar

Moschini, I. (2012). Evoluzione del concetto di testo. In: Il Testo Al Centro. Atti Del Convegno in Onore Di Gigliola Sacerdoti Mariani, F. Ditifeci (Ed.), 163–183. Firenze: Consiglio Regionale della Toscana, Edizioni dell’Assemblea.Search in Google Scholar

Moschini, I. (2013). Liberty icons: Linguistic and multimodal notes on the cultural roots of digital technologies. LEA – Lingue E Letterature D’oriente E D’occidente, 2:537–552. http://www.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-lea/article/view/13844/13604.Search in Google Scholar

Moschini, I. (2014a). Interview with Theo van Leeuwen. LEA – Lingue e Letterature d’Oriente e d’Occidente, 3:203–222. http://www.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-lea/article/view/15193/14143.Search in Google Scholar

Moschini, I. (2014b). ‘You should’ve seen luke!’ or the multimodal encoding/decoding of the language of postmodern ‘webridized’ TV series, in G. Kress, R. Facchinetti and E. Adami (eds). Text & Talk, special issue: Multimodality, Meaning Making and the Issue of “Text”, 34(3):283–305.10.1515/text-2014-0004Search in Google Scholar

Moschini, I. (2015). Facebook.Com/Whitehouse: A multimodal analysis of the social-media recontextualization of the institutional encoder. In: Discourse in and Through the Media. Recontextualizing and Reconceptualzing Expert Discourse, M. Bondi, S. Cacchiani and D. Mazzi (Eds.), 170–186. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Nofre, D., Priestley, M. and Alberts, G. (2014). When technology became language. The origins of the linguistic conception of computer programming, 1950–1960. Technology and Culture, 55(1):40–75.10.1353/tech.2014.0031Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (2004). Mill between Aristotle and Bentham. Daedalus, 133(2):60–68.10.1093/0199286280.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Petroni, S. (2011). Language in the Multimodal Web Domain. Roma/ Toronto: Aracne-Legas.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, M. (2009a, January 20). Change Has Come to the White House. http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/change_has_come_to_whitehouse-gov/Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, M. (2009b, May 1), White House 2.0, https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2009/05/01/whitehouse-20Search in Google Scholar

Puschmann, C. (2013). Blogging. In: Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, S. Herring, D. Stein and T. Virtanen (Eds.), 83–108. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214468.83Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, E. S. ed. (1993). The New Hacker’s Dictionary. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/index.html.Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, E. S. 2014 (2001). How to Become a Hacker. http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html#believe4Search in Google Scholar

Sacerdoti Mariani, G. (2005). The power of the language in delineating the boundaries of power: The US Constitution interpreted by the first ‘federalist community. In: Identity, Community, Discourse. English in Intercultural Settings, G. Cortese and A. Duszak (Eds.), 361–380. Berlin/London: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Tifentale, A. and Manovich, L. (2015). Selfiecity: Exploring photography and self-fashioning in social media. In Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation and Design, D. Berry and M. Dieter (Eds.), 109–122. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://manovich.net/content/04-projects/080-selfiecity exploring/selfiecity_chapter.pdf.10.1057/9781137437204_9Search in Google Scholar

Turner, F. (2006). From Counterculture to Cyberculture. Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226817439.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, T. (2008). Society and Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Search in Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, T. (2013). Critical analysis of multimodal discourse. In: Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, C. Chapelle (Ed.), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0269Search in Google Scholar