Home New ecological aspects of the pacarana (Dinomys branickii) in southeastern Peru
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

New ecological aspects of the pacarana (Dinomys branickii) in southeastern Peru

  • Sam Pottie EMAIL logo , Arianna Basto , Andrew Whitworth , Christopher Beirne , Ruthmery Pillco Huarcaya and Adrian Forsyth
Published/Copyright: February 12, 2025

Abstract

This study provides new insights into the behavioral ecology of Dinomys branickii based on long-term camera trap surveys conducted at three sites along an altitudinal gradient in southeastern Peru. Notably, we document the first known cases of geophagy in this species, which suggests a highly herbivorous diet. Moreover, in contrast to previous reports that described D. branickii as a group-living species, our data indicate that it is primarily solitary, with group formations likely limited to reproductive activities. Additionally, we confirm the species’ predominantly nocturnal and crepuscular activity patterns, with most activity occurring between 02:00 and 05:00 h. By calculating and comparing camera trap detection rates, used as an index of relative abundance (RAI), for D. branickii across different surveys, we highlight the species’ ecological rarity, evidenced by consistently low detection rates (0.163; 0.173 and 0.011 events per 1,000 trap-days) across diverse habitats and survey designs.


Corresponding author: Sam Pottie, Climate Corridors, 1759 R Street, Washington, DC, 20009, USA, E-mail:

Funding source: Wildlife Protection Solutions

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the field rangers of the Los Amigos Conservation Concession for their support in maintaining the camera-trap grid, as well as Julie Van den Broeck for providing us the video of the pacarana in Cocha Cashu Biological Station.

  1. Research ethics: This study was conducted in full compliance with all necessary ethical guidelines and regulations. Research activities were carried out under the research permit Nº AUT-IFS-2024-025n, issued by SERFOR, ensuring adherence to ethical standards for wildlife research.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: S.P. conceptualized the study and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. A.B. was responsible for the logistics of the study and contributed to data collection in Los Amigos. A.W. participated in data collection for the Manu Tree Top Project and helped create the manuscript into its final form. C.B. collected data for the Manu Tree Top Project and performed the data analyses and assisted in the final write-up of the draft. R.P.H. was responsible for data collection in the Kosnipata Valley. A.F. helped conceptualize the study and create the final manuscript. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: Funding for the camera-traps was provided by the Moore Foundation (https://www.moore.org) and Wildlife Protection Solutions (https://www.wildlifeprotectionsolutions.org).

  7. Data availability: Camera trap videos of Dinomys branickii conducting geophagy were made available through a data repository and can be accessed through the following DOIs: https://doi.org/10.5446/68598 and https://doi.org/10.5446/68591.

References

Anile, S. and Devillard, S. (2016). Study design and body mass influence RAIs from camera trap studies. Anim. Conserv. 19: 35–45, https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12214.Search in Google Scholar

Baron-Prieto, F.A., Aya-Cuero, C.A., Correa-Hernandez, K.L., and Caceres-Martinez, C.H. (2023). Primer registro fotográfico de la guagua loba Dinomys branickii (Rodentia: Dinomyidae) en el departamento de Norte de Santander, Colombia. Mammal. Notes 9, https://doi.org/10.47603/mano.v9n2.393.Search in Google Scholar

Bedoya-Durán, M.J., Murillo-García, O.E., and Branch, L.C. (2021). Factors outside privately protected areas determine mammal assemblages in a global biodiversity hotspot in the Andes. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 32: e01921, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01921.Search in Google Scholar

Boher, S. and Marin, B. (1988). El pacarana (Dinomys branickii) en Venezuela. Natura 84: 14–18.Search in Google Scholar

Bostelmann-Torrealba, J. and Ubilla, M. (2011). New genus of giant Dinomyidae (Rodentia: Hystricognathi: Caviomorpha) from the late miocene of Uruguay. J. Mammal. 92:169-178. https://doi.org/10.1644/10-MAMM-A-099.Search in Google Scholar

Bowler, M., Tobler, M., Endress, B., Gilmore, M., and Anderson, M. (2016). Estimating mammalian species richness and occupancy in tropical forest canopies with arboreal camera traps. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 3: 146–157, https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.35.Search in Google Scholar

Caravaggi, A., Banks, P.B., Burton, A.C., Finlay, C.M.V., Haswell, P.M., Hayward, M.W., Rowcliffe, M.J., and Wood, M.D. (2017). A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 3: 109–122, https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.48.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, L. and Eisenberg, J. (1972). Notes on the behaviour and breeding of pacaranas (Dinomys branickii) in captivity. Int. Zoo. Yearb. 12: 108–114, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1090.1972.tb02287.x.Search in Google Scholar

Cossios, E.D. and Zevallos, A.R. (2019). Diversity and diel activity of medium and large mammals recorded with camera traps in Tingo Mariá National Park, Huánuco, Peru. Rev. Peru. Biol. 26: 325–332, https://doi.org/10.15381/rpb.v26i3.16776.Search in Google Scholar

Crandall, L. (1964). The management of wild mammals in captivity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Dudley, R., Kaspari, M., and Yanoviak, S.P. (2012). Lust for salt in the western Amazon. Biotropica 44: 6–9, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00818.x.Search in Google Scholar

Duvall, E.S., Hoeneisen, N.A., Suárez, E., and Flecker, A.S. (2024). Geophagy by a large herbivore (capybara, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) driven by a human sodium supply. Biotropica 56: e13314, https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.13314.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, J. and Redford, K. (1999). Mammals of the Neotropics. Volume 3. The Central Neotropics: Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Brazil. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Fack, V., Shanee, S., Drubbel, R.V., Meunier, H., and Vercauteren, M. (2020). Geophagy in wild yellow-tailed woolly monkeys (Lagothrix flavicauda) is brief and rare. Int. J. Primatol. 41: 566–582, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-020-00161-8.Search in Google Scholar

Gilbert, N., Clare, J., Stenglein, L., and Zuckerberg, B. (2020). Abundance estimation of unmarked animals based on camera-trap data. Conserv. Biol. 35: 88–100, https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13517.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Goeldi, E.A. (1904). On the rare rodent Dinomys branickii Peters. In: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, vol. 74. Zoological Society of London (ZSL), London, UK, pp. 158–162.10.1111/j.1469-7998.1904.tb08324.xSearch in Google Scholar

González, J.L. and Osbahr, K. (2013). Composición botánica y nutricional de la dieta de Dinomys branickii (Rodentia: Dinomyidae) en los Andes Centrales de Colombia. Rev. U.D.C.A Actual. Divulg. Cient. 16: 17–27, https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v16.n1.2013.879.Search in Google Scholar

Grand, T. and Eisenberg, J. (1982). On the affinities of the Dinomyidae. Säugetierkd. Mitt. 30: 151–157.Search in Google Scholar

Gregory, T., Carrasco-Rueda, F., D., B., and Kolowski, J. (2022). Rush hour: arboreal mammal activity patterns in natural canopy bridges in the Peruvian Amazon. Folia Primatol. 93: 3–6.10.1163/14219980-20211209Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, B.M., Bowler, M., Gilmore, M.P., and Luther, D. (2020). Temporal patterns of visitation of birds and mammals at mineral licks in the Peruvian Amazon. Ecol. Evol. 10: 14152–14164, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Grimwood, I. (1969). Notes on the distribution and status of some Peruvian mammals. In: American Committee for International Wild Life Protection and New York Zoological Society. Special Publication, Vol. 21, pp. 1–86.Search in Google Scholar

Johns, T. and Duquette, M. (1991) Detoxification and mineral supplementation as functions of geophagy. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 53: 448–456, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/53.2.448, https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/53/2/448/4694247.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Klaus, G. and Schmid, B. (1999). Geophagy at natural licks and mammal ecology: a review. Mammalia 62: 482–498.10.1515/mamm.1998.62.4.482bSearch in Google Scholar

Mena, J.L. and Pacheco, V. (2022). Mountains and lowland habitats: a camera trap survey of mammal diversity in the Andes and Amazon of Peru. Mammal Review 52: 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12216.Search in Google Scholar

Negret, P.J., Garzón, O., and Stevenson, P.R. (2015). First preliminary inventory of non-flying mammals of the Alto Fragua Indi-wasi National Park, Colombia. Mammal. Notes 2: 32–35, https://doi.org/10.47603/manovol2n1.32-35.Search in Google Scholar

Neto, S.R., Costa, V., Gabriel, Á., and Guimarães, D. (2017). Dinomys branickii Peters, 1873 (Rodentia, Dinomyidae): consumption and food preference in captivity. Biotemas 30, https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2017v30n1p91.Search in Google Scholar

Payne, C., Champagne, P., O’Donnell, H., Lange, L., Rushford, C., Rosolie, P., and Rosenzweig, D. (2024). High mammalian diversity on the Las Piedras River tributary of Madre de Dios, Peru: an annotated list of species including comments on biogeography and regional conservation. Check List 20: 152–183, https://doi.org/10.15560/20.1.152.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, W. (1873). Über Dinomys, eine merkwürdige neue Gattung der Stachelschweinartigen Nagetiere aus den Hochgebirgen von Peru. Monatsber. Königl. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1873: 551–552.10.5962/bhl.part.26974Search in Google Scholar

Pillco Huarcaya, R., Beirne, C., Serrano Rojas, S.J., and Whitworth, A. (2019). Camera trapping reveals a diverse and unique high-elevation mammal community under threat. Oryx 54: 901–908, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001096.Search in Google Scholar

Pottie, S., Bello, R., and Shanee, S. (2023). Geophagy in large-headed capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella macrocephalus) in the Reserva Nacional Tambopata, Peru. Primates 64: 381–387, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-023-01058-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rabinowitz, D. (1981) Seven forms of rarity. In: The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. Wiley, New Jersey, pp. 205–217.Search in Google Scholar

Ramírez-Chaves, H.E., Velásquez-Guarín, D., Ocampo-Velásquez, J.D., Mejía-Fontecha, I.Y., Acosta, A., Colmenares-Pinzón, J.E., Castaño, J.H., and Duque, N.R. (2021). Mammals of the Natural National Park Selva de Florencia, Caldas, Colombia. Therya 12: 461–475, https://doi.org/10.12933/THERYA-21-1101.Search in Google Scholar

Rapp, J.M. and Silman, M.R. (2012). Diurnal, seasonal, and altitudinal trends in microclimate across a tropical montane cloud forest. Clim. Res. 55: 17–32, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01127.Search in Google Scholar

Rowcliffe, J., Field, J., Turvey, S., and Carbone, C. (2008). Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 1228–1236, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01473.x.Search in Google Scholar

Saavedra-Rodríguez, C.A., Kattan, G.H., Osbahr, K., and Hoyos, J.G. (2012). Multiscale patterns of habitat and space use by the pacarana Dinomys branickii: factors limiting its distribution and abundance. Endanger. Species Res. 16: 273–281, https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00391.Search in Google Scholar

Tate, G.H.H. (1931). American Society of Mammalogists random observations on habits of South American mammals. J. Mammal. 12: 248–256, https://doi.org/10.2307/1373874.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, M.L., Baker, L., Beattie, J.R., and Baker, A.M. (2020). Determining the efficacy of camera traps, live capture traps, and detection dogs for locating cryptic small mammal species. Ecol. Evol. 10: 1054–1068, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5972.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Vine, S.J., Crowther, M.S., Lapidge, S.J., Dickman, C.R., Mooney, N., Piggott, M.P., and English, A.W. (2009). Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Wildl. Res. 36: 436–446, https://doi.org/10.1071/WR08069.Search in Google Scholar

Voss, R.S., Fleck, D.W., and Giarla, T.C. (2024). Mammalian diversity and Matses ethnomammalogy in Amazonian Peru. Part 5. Rodents. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 466, https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090.466.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

White, T. and Alberico, M. (1992). Dinomys branickii. Mamm. Species 2: 1–5, https://doi.org/10.2307/3504284.Search in Google Scholar

Whitworth, A., Braunholtz, L., Pillco Huarcaya, R., MacLeod, R., and Beirne, C. (2016). Out on a limb: arboreal camera traps as an emerging methodology for inventorying elusive rainforest mammals. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 9: 675–698, https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291600900208.Search in Google Scholar

Whitworth, A., Beirne, C., Huarcaya, R.P., Whittaker, L., Rojas, S.J.S., Tobler, M.W., and Macleod, R. (2019). Human disturbance impacts on rainforest mammals are most notable in the canopy, especially for larger‐bodied species. Divers. Distrib 25: 1166–1178, https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12930.Search in Google Scholar

Whitworth, A., Beirne, C., Basto, A., Flatt, E., Tobler, M., Powell, G., Terborgh, J., and Forsyth, A. (2022). Disappearance of an ecosystem engineer, the white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari), leads to density compensation and ecological release. Oecologia 199: 937–949, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05233-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Woods, C. (1984) Hystricognath rodents. In: Anderson, S., and Jones, J. (Eds.). Orders and families of recent mammals of the world. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 389–446.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-09-02
Accepted: 2025-01-22
Published Online: 2025-02-12
Published in Print: 2025-05-26

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Conservation
  3. Tickell’s bat, Hesperoptenus tickelli (Blyth, 1851), in Sri Lanka with new records after 58 years and roosting ecology notes
  4. Ecology
  5. New ecological aspects of the pacarana (Dinomys branickii) in southeastern Peru
  6. Variation in mammal ecological patterns in response to seasonality in a Brazilian tropical dry forest
  7. Niche partitioning between two marsupials inhabiting the Yungas of Northwestern Argentina: overlapping diets in non-overlapping lifestyles?
  8. Characteristics of tree hollows used by Nilgiri marten Martes gwatkinsii in the Western Ghats, India
  9. How much do we know about wild canid (Carnivora: Canidae) ectoparasites in Mexico? Current state of knowledge
  10. First and new records of albinism and leucism in Jaculus orientalis and Jaculus jaculus (Rodentia, Dipodidae)
  11. Biogeography
  12. The first record of the long-eared hedgehog (Hemiechinus auritus Gmelin, 1770) in Lebanon
  13. First record of Andersen’s leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros gentilis, and hairy-faced myotis, Myotis annectans from Bangladesh
  14. Ethology
  15. Temperature and pups influence daytime roosting behavior of the great fruit-eating bat, Artibeus lituratus, in an urban southern Brazilian habitat
  16. Taxonomy/Phylogeny
  17. On the phylogenetic position of Rhinolophus sakejiensis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae)
  18. New geographical records of Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera) for the Brazilian Caatinga, with taxonomic notes
  19. Complete mitogenome of Prionailurus bengalensis alleni and taxonomic revisions of leopard cat subspecies
  20. Karyotype of the lesser gymnure Hylomys maxi and comparison with its Vietnamese congeners (Mammalia: Eulipotyphla: Erinaceidae)
Downloaded on 2.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mammalia-2024-0127/html
Scroll to top button