Gender stereotypes and communication styles: a case study of compliments on Facebook in Jordan
-
Ayah Alnajjar
Abstract
This paper examines the influence of gender stereotypes on communication styles, specifically investigating how the gender of Jordanians may affect their selection of compliments on Facebook. The analysis is based on a corpus of 200 compliments and 200 compliment responses collected from the platform. The researchers utilized the model developed by Eslami et al. (2019. Online compliments of Iranian Facebook users. In From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness: Multilingual and multicultural perspectives, 68–92) for data analysis. A mixed-method approach was employed to analyze the data both quantitatively and qualitatively. The results revealed that mixed compliments, which combine verbal and non-verbal elements, were the most frequently used (66 %), followed by verbal compliments (30 %) and non-verbal compliments (4 %). Among both verbal and mixed compliments, explicit compliments emerged as the most prevalent type (73 %). Gender differences were observed in lexical choices and the use of modifiers. Males tended to favor expressions associated with masculinity and social authority, while females used more emotionally driven and aesthetically focused language. These findings suggest that online platforms, such as Facebook, both reflect and reinforce traditional gender roles within the Jordanian society. This analysis could lead to a better understanding of how gender and different cultural backgrounds shape communication styles on social media platforms.
-
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: The paper was not funded.
-
Data availability: The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study will be made available upon request.
-
AI statement: AI tools were used to proofread some sentences as the authors are not native speakers of English. However, we reviewed the paper after and we take full responsibility for its contents.
References
Abu-Rumman, M. A., A. R. M. Altakhaineh, M. Al-Badawi & Y. Hammouri. 2024. Undergraduate and postgraduate students’ emails to faculty members: An impoliteness perspective. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 20(1). 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2024-2006 Suche in Google Scholar
Al Omoush, K. S., S. G. Yaseen & M. A. Alma’Aitah. 2012. The impact of Arab cultural values on online social networking: The case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 28(6). 2387–2399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.010.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Rousan, M. Y. & N. M. Awal. 2016. Compliment responses among male and female Jordanian University students. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 16(1). 19–34.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Rousan, M. Y., N. M. Awal & K. Salehuddin. 2014. Gender differences in using topics and forms of compliment among Jordanian students in Malaysia. Language & Communication 1(2). 125–136.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Saidat, E. M., A. I. Tawalbeh, N. A. Malkawi, T. M. Shehadeh, K. A. Rabab’ah & M. A. Rababah. 2023. The linguistic implications of Facebook nicknames for Jordanian males and females. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 13(10). 2457–2467. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.04.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Shboul, Y., I. F. Huwari, O. A. Al-Dala’ien & Z. Al-Daher. 2022. An analysis of compliment response strategies by Jordanian adolescent students: The influence of gender and Social Power. Theory and Pr9actice in Language Studies 12(7). 1252–1261. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1207.02.Suche in Google Scholar
Altakhaineh, A. R. M. & A. Zibin. 2021. A new perspective on university ranking methods worldwide and in the Arab region: Facts and suggestions. Quality in Higher Education 27(3). 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2021.1937819.Suche in Google Scholar
Altakhaineh, A. R. M. & A. Zibin. 2024. Filial construct states in Arabic: Exploring metaphtonymies and embodied cultural cognition. Cognitive Studies| Études Cognitives 24. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.3126.Suche in Google Scholar
Altakhaineh, A. R. M., A. Zibin & F. Al-Kalbani. 2024. An analysis of Arabic tautology in English compounds used in customer-service settings in Jordan: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 220. 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Tkhayneh, K. M. & K. K. Nser. 2019. Emirati women’s perceptions of polygamy according to age, employment, and educational level. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 7(5). 911–916. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.75117.Suche in Google Scholar
Amarachi, O. J. & A. B. Joseph. 2023. Breaking gender stereotypes: A critical appraisal of barriers to effective communication. Wukari International Studies Journal 7(3). 120–138.Suche in Google Scholar
Aries, E. 1987. Gender and communication. Sage Publications, Inc.Suche in Google Scholar
Aries, E. 2006. Sex differences in interaction: A reexamination. In K. Dindia & D. J. Canary (eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication, 21–36. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar
Bakhtiyarovna, K. A. 2024. Gender differences in language use and politeness strategies. American Journal of Philological Sciences 4(4). 17–23. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/volume04issue04-04.Suche in Google Scholar
Banikalef, A. E. A. A. 2019. The impact of culture and gender on the production of online speech acts among Jordanian Facebook users. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies 19(2). 394–410. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.19.2.9.Suche in Google Scholar
Bem, S. L. 1977. The Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI). In J. E. Jones & J. W. Pfeiffer (eds.), The 1975 annual handbook for group facilitators, 83–85. La Jolla, Calif: University Associates.Suche in Google Scholar
Biernat, M., A. K. Sesko, N. Dess, J. Marecek & L. Bell. 2018. Gender stereotypes and stereotyping. In N. K. Dess, J. Marecek & L. C. Bell (eds.), Gender, sex, and sexualities: Psychological perspectives, 171–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190658540.003.0008Suche in Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., J. House & G. Kasper. 1989. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Suche in Google Scholar
Boyle, R. 2000. You’ve worked with Elizabeth Taylor!’: Phatic functions and implicit. Applied Linguistics 21(1). 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.26.Suche in Google Scholar
Braun, V. & V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2). 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.Suche in Google Scholar
Brima, M. S. E. 2022. The emphasis in Arabic and English: A study in contrast. مجلة كلية الاداب, (53), 214–219.Suche in Google Scholar
Brinkmann, S. 2014. Unstructured and semi-structured interviewing. In P. Leavy (ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research, 277–299. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.030Suche in Google Scholar
Case, S. S. 1994. Gender differences in communication and behaviour in organizations. In Women in management: Current research issues, 144–167. London: Paul Chapman.Suche in Google Scholar
Charlebois, J. 2016. Gender and communication. In Encyclopedia of family studies, 1–7.10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs208Suche in Google Scholar
Costello, A., E. Fedorova, Z. Jin & R. Mihalcea. 2022. Editing a woman’s voice. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.02581.Suche in Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. & S. J. Karau. 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109(3). 573–598.10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573Suche in Google Scholar
Eslami, Z. R., N. Jabbari & L. J. Kuo. 2015. Compliment response behaviour on Facebook: A study with Iranian Facebook users. International Review of Pragmatics 7(2). 244–277. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00702005.Suche in Google Scholar
Eslami, Z. R., N. Jabbari & L. J. Kuo. 2019. Online compliments of Iranian Facebook users. In From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness: Multilingual and multicultural perspectives, 68–92.10.1017/9781108182119.004Suche in Google Scholar
Farghal, M. & M. A. Al-Khatib. 2001. Jordanian college students’ responses to compliments: A pilot study. Journal of Pragmatics 33(9). 1485–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00006-6.Suche in Google Scholar
Hakami, S. A. A., R. Hendley & P. Smith. 2022. Gender impact on emoji sentiment analysis among Arabic users in digital networks. In 2022 14th international conference on computational intelligence and communication networks (CICN), 199–203. IEEE.10.1109/CICN56167.2022.10008377Suche in Google Scholar
Hamdan, H. 2021. The pragmatic functions of Facebook likes on status updates: Evidence from user perceptions. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures (JJMLL) 13(3). 665–679. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.13.4.4.Suche in Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E., A. S. Wallen, D. Fuchs & M. M. Tamkins. 2004. Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(3). 416–427.10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416Suche in Google Scholar
Herbert, R. K. 1990. Sex-based differences in compliment behavior. Language in Society 19(2). 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014378.Suche in Google Scholar
Herbert, R. K. 1997. The sociology of compliment work in Polish and English. In Sociolinguistics: A reader, 487–500.10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_38Suche in Google Scholar
Holmes, J. 1986. Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics. 485–508.Suche in Google Scholar
Holmes, J. 1988. Paying compliments: A sex-preferential politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics 12(4). 445–465.10.1016/0378-2166(88)90005-7Suche in Google Scholar
Ja’afreh, N. 2023. A pragmatic contrastive analysis of apology strategies in Jordanian Arabic and English language. Jordan Journal of Applied Science-Humanities Series 37(2). 69–86. https://doi.org/10.35192/jjoas-h.v37i2.601.Suche in Google Scholar
Kazemian, R. 2021. The study of gender and age differences in the use of emoji among Iranian internet users and reasons for using emoji in preference to emoticon. New Media Studies 7(26). 266–239. https://doi.org/10.22054/nms.2021.50985.933.Suche in Google Scholar
Kirtley, M. D. & J. B. Weaver III. 1999. Exploring the impact of gender role self-perception on communication style. Women’s Studies in Communication 22(2). 190–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.1999.10162420.Suche in Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. The social setting of linguistic change. Sociolinguistic Patterns. 260–325.Suche in Google Scholar
Leaper, C. & R. D. Robnett. 2011. Women are more likely than men to use tentative language, aren’t they? A meta-analysis testing for gender differences and moderators. Psychology of Women Quarterly 35(1). 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310392728.Suche in Google Scholar
Lindvall-Östling, M., M. Deutschmann & A. Steinvall. 2020. An exploratory study on linguistic gender stereotypes and their effects on perception. Open Linguistics 6(1). 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0033.Suche in Google Scholar
Manes, J. 1983. Compliments: A mirror of cultural values. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition, 96–102. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Suche in Google Scholar
Manes, J. & N. Wolfson. 1981. The compliment formula. In Florian Coulmas (eds.), Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication Situations and prepatterned speech, vol. 96, 115–132. Walter de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
McCallister, L. 1992. “ I wish I’d said that!”. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Suche in Google Scholar
Migdadi, F., M. A. Badarneh & K. Momani. 2010. Divine will and its extensions: Communicative functions of maašaallah in colloquial Jordanian Arabic. Communication Monographs 77(4). 480–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.502539.Suche in Google Scholar
Mohammed, A. A. M. M. & A. K. Al-Rickaby. 2020. Compliment response behaviour on Facebook: A gender study of compliment response speech act by Iraqi Facebook users. Journal of Human Sciences (19922876) 27(4). 1.10.33855/0905-027-004-019Suche in Google Scholar
Nickerson, C. & V. P. Goby. 2017. Exploring leadership communication in the United Arab Emirates: Issues of culture and gender. Challenging Leadership Stereotypes Through Discourse: Power, Management and Gender. 221–238.10.1007/978-981-10-4319-2_10Suche in Google Scholar
Norton, R. 1983. Communicator style. Beverly Hills: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice, 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Suche in Google Scholar
Placencia, M. E. & A. Lower. 2013. Your kids are so stinkin’cute!:-): Complimenting behavior on Facebook among family and friends. Intercultural Pragmatics 10(4). 617–646. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0029.Suche in Google Scholar
Powell, G. N., D. A. Butterfield & J. D. Parent. 2002. Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed? Journal of Management 28(2). 177–193.10.1177/014920630202800203Suche in Google Scholar
Rabionet, S. E. 2011. How I learned to design and conduct semi-structured interviews: An ongoing and continuous journey. Qualitative Report 16(2). 563–566.Suche in Google Scholar
Smith, A. & M. Anderson. 2018. Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center Society 19(2). 201–224.Suche in Google Scholar
Still, L. V. 2006. Where are the women in leadership in Australia? Women in Management Review 21(3). 180–194.10.1108/09649420610657371Suche in Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 2007. You just don’t understand: Women and Men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.Suche in Google Scholar
Von Hippel, C., C. Wiryakusuma, J. Bowden & M. Shochet. 2011. Stereotype threat and female communication styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37(10). 1312–1324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211410439.Suche in Google Scholar
Zibin, A., Y. Al-Sabatin & A. R. M. Altakhaineh. 2025. Social media’s influence on gendered interpersonal communication: Insights from Jordan. Journalism and Media 6(2). 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6020047.Suche in Google Scholar
Zibin, A., S. Daoud & A. R. M. Altakhaineh. 2024. Indexical meanings of the realization of/sʕ/ص as [s] س in spoken and written Jordanian Arabic: A language change in progress? Folia Linguistica 58(2). 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2024-2003.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
