Startseite Typology of motion events in Tugen
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Typology of motion events in Tugen

  • Prisca Jerono

    Dr. Prisca Jerono is a lecturer at the Department of Kiswahili, at the University of Nairobi, Kenya. Her research interests revolve around language structure, language and cognition, language and culture and inter-relationships in languages. She has published in various volumes and journals, including: International Journal of Language and Linguistics, International Journal of Linguistics & Communication, and Nilo-Saharan-Models and Descriptions.

    EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 25. September 2020

Abstract

All human activity including motion is construed mentally with reference to different objects and spatial relations that are relevant (Waliński 2014). Following the work of Talmy (1985, 2000) on categorization of languages on the basis of motion events into verb framed languages and satellite framed languages, this paper addresses the typology of the Tugen language regarding motion events. It takes into consideration the reclassification of the V-languages into equipollent frame and the doubling frame, (Slobin 2003; Croft et al. 2010). Further it explores the hybrid system as expounded by Schröder (2016) on the categorization of V-languages so as to cater for languages that do not fit into the equipollent and the doubling frame. This paper analyses motion events in Tugen, a Kalenjin language belonging to the southern Nilotic cluster. In this analysis, Tugen is seen as both verb framed language and satellite framed as a result of prevalence of deictic directionals and the applicative. The language also bears an associated motion affix which relates simultaneous motion to non-motion events. The associated motion affix renders the motion events to be satellite framed. The occurrence of deictic directionals on motion events that are verb framed can also be taken to be instances of doubling frame.

About the author

Dr. Prisca Jerono

Dr. Prisca Jerono is a lecturer at the Department of Kiswahili, at the University of Nairobi, Kenya. Her research interests revolve around language structure, language and cognition, language and culture and inter-relationships in languages. She has published in various volumes and journals, including: International Journal of Language and Linguistics, International Journal of Linguistics & Communication, and Nilo-Saharan-Models and Descriptions.

References

Ameka Felix K. & James Essegbey. 2013.Serialising languages: Satellite framed, verb framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics 2(1). 19–38.Suche in Google Scholar

Aske, Jon. 1989. Path Predicates in English and Spanish: A Closer Look. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1–14. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v15i0.1753Suche in Google Scholar

Belkadi, Aicha. 2015. Associated motion with deictic directionals: A comparative overview. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 17. 49–76.Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William, Jóhanna Barðdal, Willem B. Hollmann, Violeta Sotirova & Chiaki Taoka. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Hans C. Boas (ed.), Constructive Studies in Construction Grammar 201–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0018Suche in Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff. 1997. The semantics of coming and going. Pragmatics 7(2). 147– 162.10.1075/prag.7.2.02godSuche in Google Scholar

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. 2019. Kenya Population & Housing Census Volume IV. Available at: https://www.knbs.or.ke/?wpdmpro=2019-kenya-population-and-housing-census-volume-iv-distribution-of-population-by-socio-economic-characteristics (accessed September 12, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 2003. Language and thought online: the cognallative consequences of linguistic relativity. In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought 157–192. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan. I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology & the expression of motion events. In Sven Stromqvist & Ludo Venhoeven (eds), Relating Events in Narrative. Typological & Contextual Perspectives 219–257 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Slobin Dan. I. 2005. Linguistic representations of motion events: What is signifier and what is signified. In Costantino Maeder, Olga Fischer & William Herlofsky (eds.), Outside-in, Inside-out: Iconicity in Language and Literature 4 307–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.4.22sloSuche in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. & Nini Hoiting. 1994. Reference to Movement in Spoken and Signed Languages. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, 487–505. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v20i1.1466Suche in Google Scholar

Schröder, Helga. 2016. Motion in Toposa: Is Toposa verb frame or satellite frame language. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 12(2). 153–175.10.1515/lpp-2016-0010Suche in Google Scholar

Payne, Doris L. & Manuel A. Otero. 2016.Deictic (associated-)motion and the tense-aspect domain: evidence from Nilotic & Koman. Paper presented at the Syntax of the World’s Languages 7 Workshop on Associated Motion at Universidad de Mexico, Mexico.Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2000.Towards a Cognallative Semantics (Vol 2.). Typology in Process and Concept Structuring Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6848.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shoepnen (ed.), Language Typology & Syntactic Description (Vol 3). Grammatical Categories and Lexicon 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Waliński, Jacek. T. 2014. Complementarity of Space and Time in Distance Representations: A Cognitive Corpus-based Study Łódź: Łódź University Press.10.18778/7969-441-9Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-09-25
Published in Print: 2019-12-18

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 5.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lpp-2019-0008/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen