Some innate characteristics of neural network models of morphological inflection

References

Albright, Adam & Bruce Hayes. 2003. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition 90(2). 119–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00146-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Allen, Shanley E. M. 1996. Aspects of argument structure acquisition in Inuktitut. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.13Suche in Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald. 1993. On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Geert Booij & Jap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1992, 181–208. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-3710-4_7Suche in Google Scholar

Bat-El, Outi. 2014. The acquisition of Hebrew phonology and morphology. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004280151Suche in Google Scholar

Belth, Caleb, Sarah Payne, Deniz Beser, Jordan Kodner & Charles Yang. 2021. The greedy and recursive search for morphological productivity. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 43. 2869–2875.Suche in Google Scholar

Bergmanis, Toms, Katharina Kann, Hinrich Schütze & Sharon Goldwater. 2017. Training data augmentation for low-resource morphological inflection. In Mans Hulden (ed.), Proceedings of the CoNLL SIGMORPHON 2017 shared task: Universal morphological reinflection, 31–39. Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/K17-2002Suche in Google Scholar

Berko, Jean. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14(2-3). 150–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661.Suche in Google Scholar

Bornstein, Marc H., Linda R. Cote, Sharone Maital, Kathleen Painter, Sung-Yun Park, Liliana Pascual, Marie-Germaine Pêcheux, Josette Ruel, Paola Venuti & Andre Vyt. 2004. Cross-linguistic analysis of vocabulary in young children: Spanish, Dutch, French, Hebrew, Italian, Korean, and American English. Child Development 75(4). 1115–1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00729.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Bowerman, Melissa. 1982. Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Eric Wanner & Lila Gleitman (eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art, 319–346. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Braginsky, Mika. 2022. Language learning at scale: Data-driven and model-motivated analyses of lexical and morphological development. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Braginsky, Mika, Daniel Yurovsky, Virginia A. Marchman & Michael C. Frank. 2019. Consistency and variability in children’s word learning across languages. Open Mind 3. 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00026.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.9Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186.Suche in Google Scholar

Caprin, Claudia & Maria Teresa Guasti. 2009. The acquisition of morphosyntax in Italian: A cross-sectional study. Applied Psycholinguistics 30(1). 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716408090024.Suche in Google Scholar

Chan, Erwin. 2008. Structures and distributions in morphological learning. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Clahsen, Harald, Fraibet Aveledo & Iggy Roca. 2002. The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language 29(3). 591–622. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000902005172.Suche in Google Scholar

Clahsen, Harald, Gary Marcus, Susanne Bartke & Richard Wiese. 1996. Compounding and inflection in German child language. In Gert Booij & Jap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 115–142. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_7Suche in Google Scholar

Clahsen, Harald & Monika Rothweiler. 1993. Inflectional rules in children’s grammars: Evidence from German participles. In Gert Booij & Jap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1992, 1–34. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-3710-4_1Suche in Google Scholar

Clahsen, Harald, Monika Rothweiler, Andreas Woest & Gary F. Marcus. 1992. Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition 45(3). 225–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90018-d.Suche in Google Scholar

Corkery, Maria, Yevgen Matusevych & Sharon Goldwater. 2019. Are we there yet? Encoder-decoder neural networks as cognitive models of English past tense inflection. In Anna Korhonen, David Traum & Lluís Márquez (eds.), Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 3868–3877. Florence: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/P19-1376Suche in Google Scholar

Cotterell, Ryan, Christo Kirov, John Sylak-Glassman, Géraldine Walther, Ekaterina Vylomova, Arya D. McCarthy, Katharina Kann, Sabrina J. Mielke, Garrett Nicolai, Miikka Silfverberg, David Yarowsky, Jason Eisner & Mans Hulden. 2018. The CoNLL–SIGMORPHON 2018 shared task: Universal morphological reinflection. In Mans Hulden & Ryan Cotterell (eds.), Proceedings of the CoNLL–SIGMORPHON 2018 shared task: Universal morphological reinflection, 1–27. Brussels: Association for Computational Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar

Cotterell, Ryan, Christo Kirov, John Sylak-Glassman, Géraldine Walther, Ekaterina Vylomova, Patrick Xia, Manaal Faruqui, Sandra Kübler, David Yarowsky, Jason Eisner & Mans Hulden. 2017. CoNLL–SIGMORPHON 2017 shared task: Universal morphological reinflection in 52 languages. In Mans Hulden (ed.), Proceedings of the CoNLL SIGMORPHON 2017 shared task: Universal morphological reinflection, 1–30. Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/K17-2001Suche in Google Scholar

Cotterell, Ryan, Christo Kirov, John Sylak-Glassman, David Yarowsky, Jason Eisner & Mans Hulden. 2016. The SIGMORPHON 2016 shared task: Morphological reinflection. In Micha Elsner & Sandra Kuebler (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th SIGMORPHON workshop on computational research in phonetics, phonology, and morphology, 10–22. Berlin: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/W16-2002Suche in Google Scholar

Dankers, Verna, Anna Langedijk, Kate McCurdy, Adina Williams & Dieuwke Hupkes. 2021. Generalising to German plural noun classes, from the perspective of a recurrent neural network. In Arianna Bisazza & Omri Abend (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th conference on computational natural language learning, 94–108. Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2021.conll-1.8Suche in Google Scholar

Daugherty, Kim G. & Mary Hare. 1993. What’s in a rule? The past tense by some other name might be called a connectionist net. In Proceedings of the 1993 connectionist models summer school, 149–156. Hove: Psychology Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Deen, Kamil. 2005. The acquisition of Swahili. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.40Suche in Google Scholar

Demuth, Katherine. 2003. The acquisition of Bantu languages. In Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu languages, 209–222. London: Taylor and Francis.Suche in Google Scholar

Elman, Jeffrey. 1998. Generalization, simple recurrent networks, and the emergence of structure. In Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the cognitive science society, 543–548. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Elsen, Hilke. 2002. The acquisition of German plurals. In O. E. Pfeiffer S. Bendjaballah, W. U. Dressler & M. Voeikova (eds.), Selected papers from the 9th morphology meeting, 117–127. Vienna: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.218.10elsSuche in Google Scholar

Ervin, Susan M. & Wick R. Miller. 1963. Language development. In H. W. Stevenson (ed.), Child psychology, 108–143. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fenson, Larry, Philip S. Dale, J. Steven Reznick, Elizabeth Bates, Donna J. Thal, Stephen J. Pethick, Michael Tomasello, Carolyn B. Mervis & Joan Stiles. 1994. Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 59(5). 1–185. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166093.Suche in Google Scholar

Fusco, Achille, Matilde Barbini, Maria Letizia Piccini Bianchessi, Veronica Bressan, Sofia Neri, Sarah Rossi, Tommaso Sgrizzi & Cristiano Chesi. 2024. Recurrent networks are (linguistically) better? An (ongoing) experiment on small-LM training on child-directed speech in Italian. In Felice Dell’Orletta, Alessandro Lenci, Simonetta Montemagni & Rachele Sprugnoli (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Italian conference on computational linguistics (CLiC-it 2024), 382–389. Pisa: CEUR Workshop Proceedings Available at: https://aclanthology.org/2024.clicit-1.46/.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldman, Omer, Khuyagbaatar Batsuren, Salam Khalifa, Aryaman Arora, Garrett Nicolai, Reut Tsarfaty & Ekaterina Vylomova. 2023. SIGMORPHON–UniMorph 2023 shared task 0: Typologically diverse morphological inflection. In Garrett Nicolai, Eleanor Chodroff, Frederic Mailhot & Çağrı Çöltekin (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th SIGMORPHON workshop on computational research in phonetics, phonology, and morphology, 117–125. Toronto: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2023.sigmorphon-1.13Suche in Google Scholar

Goodman, Judith C., Philip S. Dale & Ping Li. 2008. Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 35(3). 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000907008641.Suche in Google Scholar

Gorman, Kyle, Arya D. McCarthy, Ryan Cotterell, Ekaterina Vylomova, Miikka Silfverberg & Magdalena Markowska. 2019. Weird inflects but ok: Making sense of morphological generation errors. In Mohit Bansal & Aline Villavicencio (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd conference on computational natural language learning, 140–151. Hong Kong: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/K19-1014Suche in Google Scholar

Hahn, Ulrike & Ramin Charles Nakisa. 2000. German inflection: Single route or dual route? Cognitive Psychology 41(4). 313–360. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2000.0737.Suche in Google Scholar

Hare, Mary, Jeffrey L. Elman & Kim G. Daugherty. 1995. Default generalisation in connectionist networks. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(6). 601–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407115.Suche in Google Scholar

Hart, Betty & Todd R. Risley. 1995. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Towson, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Suche in Google Scholar

Janda, A. Laura & M. Francis Tyers. 2021. Less is more: Why all paradigms are defective, and why that is a good thing. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17(1). 109–141. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2018-0031.Suche in Google Scholar

Kann, Katharina, Jesus Manuel Mager Hois, Ivan Vladimir Meza-Ruiz & Hinrich Schütze. 2018. Fortification of neural morphological segmentation models for polysynthetic minimal-resource languages. In Marilyn Walker, Heng Ji & Amanda Stent (eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies, volume 1 (Long papers), 47–57. New Orleans, LA: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/N18-1005Suche in Google Scholar

Kann, Katharina, Arya D. McCarthy, Nicolai Garrett & Mans Hulden. 2020. The SIGMORPHON 2020 shared task on unsupervised morphological paradigm completion. In Garrett Nicolai, Kyle Gorman & Ryan Cotterell (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th SIGMORPHON workshop on computational research in phonetics, phonology, and morphology, 51–62. Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2020.sigmorphon-1.3Suche in Google Scholar

Kauschke, Christina, Anna Kurth & Ulrike Domahs. 2011. Acquisition of German noun plurals in typically developing children and children with specific language impairment. Child Development Research 2011(1). 718925. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/718925.Suche in Google Scholar

Kirov, Christo & Ryan Cotterell. 2018. Recurrent neural networks in linguistic theory: Revisiting Pinker and Prince (1988) and the past tense debate. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 6. 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00247.Suche in Google Scholar

Kodner, Jordan, Salam Khalifa, Khuyagbaatar Batsuren, Hossep Dolatian, Ryan Cotterell, Faruk Akkus, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Taras andrushko, Aryaman Arora, Nona Atanalov, Gábor Bella, Elena Budianskaya, Yustinus Ghanggo Ate, Omer Goldman, David Guriel, Simon Guriel, Silvia Guriel-Agiashvili, Witold Kieraś, Andrew Krizhanovsky, Natalia Krizhanovsky, Igor Marchenko, Magdalena Markowska, Polina Mashkovtseva, Maria Nepomniashchaya, Daria Rodionova, Karina Scheifer, Alexandra Sorova, Anastasia Yemelina, Jeremiah Young & Ekaterina Vylomova. 2022. SIGMORPHON–UniMorph 2022 shared task 0: Generalization and typologically diverse morphological inflection. In Garrett Nicolai & Eleanor Chodroff (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th SIGMORPHON workshop on computational research in phonetics, phonology, and morphology, 176–203. Seattle, WA: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2022.sigmorphon-1.19Suche in Google Scholar

Kodner, Jordan, Salam Khalifa & Sarah Payne. 2023a. Exploring linguistic probes for morphological generalization. In Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino & Kalika Bali (eds.), Proceedings of the 2023 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, 8933–8941. Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.552Suche in Google Scholar

Kodner, Jordan, Salam Khalifa, Sarah Payne & Zoey Liu. 2023b. Re-evaluating the evaluation of neural morphological inflection models. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 45. 3259–3267.Suche in Google Scholar

Kodner, Jordan, Sarah Payne, Salam Khalifa & Zoey Liu. 2023c. Morphological inflection: A reality check. In Anna Rogers, Jordan Boyd-Graber & Naoaki Okazaki (eds.), Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL; volume 1: Long papers), 6082–6101. Toronto: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.335Suche in Google Scholar

Legate, Julie Anne & Charles Yang. 2007. Morphosyntactic learning and the development of tense. Language Acquisition 14(3). 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220701471081.Suche in Google Scholar

Lignos, Constantine & Charles Yang. 2016. Morphology and language acquisition. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 743–764. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139814720.027Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Zoey & Emily Prud’hommeaux. 2022. Data-driven model generalizability in crosslinguistic low-resource morphological segmentation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 10. 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00467.Suche in Google Scholar

Lustigman, Lyle. 2013. Developing structural specification: Productivity in early Hebrew verb usage. First Language 33(1). 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723711426828.Suche in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 1978. The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 43(1–2). 1–123. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166047.Suche in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 1996. The CHILDES system. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 5(1). 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0501.05.Suche in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian & Jared Leinbach. 1991. Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition 40(1–2). 121–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90048-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Makarov, Peter, Tatiana Ruzsics & Clematide Simon. 2017. Align and copy: UZH at SIGMORPHON 2017 shared task for morphological reinflection. In Mans Hulden (ed.), Proceedings of the CoNLL SIGMORPHON 2017 shared task: Universal morphological reinflection, 49–57. Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/K17-2004Suche in Google Scholar

Maratsos, Michael. 2000. More overregularizations after all: New data and discussion on Marcus, Pinker, Ullman, Hollander, Rosen & Xu. Journal of Child Language 27(1). 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000999004067.Suche in Google Scholar

Marcus, Gary F. 2003. The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Marcus, Gary F., Ursula Brinkmann, Harald Clahsen, Richard Wiese & Steven Pinker. 1995. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29(3). 189–256. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1995.1015.Suche in Google Scholar

Marcus, Gary F., Steven Pinker, Michael Ullman, Michelle Hollander, T. John Rosen, Fei Xu & Harald Clahsen. 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57(4). 1–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166115.Suche in Google Scholar

Marr, D. 1982. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Suche in Google Scholar

Maslen, Robert J. C., Anna L. Theakston, Elena V. M. Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2004. A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47. 1319–1333. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/099).Suche in Google Scholar

Mayol, Laia. 2007. Acquisition of irregular patterns in Spanish verbal morphology. In Ville Nurmi & Dmitry Sustretov (eds.), Proceedings of the european summer school in logic, language, and information, 185–196. Dublin: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

McCarthy, Arya D., Christo Kirov, Matteo Grella, Amrit Nidhi, Patrick Xia, Kyle Gorman, Ekaterina Vylomova, Sabrina J. Mielke, Garrett Nicolai, Miikka Silfverberg, Timofey Arkhangelskiy, Nataly Krizhanovsky, Andrew Krizhanovsky, Elena Klyachko, Alexey Sorokin, John Mansfield, Valts Ernštreits, Yuval Pinter, Cassandra L. Jacobs, Ryan Cotterell, Mans Hulden & David Yarowsky. 2020. UniMorph 3.0: Universal morphology. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Frédéric Béchet, Philippe Blache, Khalid Choukri, Christopher Cieri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, Hitoshi Isahara, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Hélène Mazo, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the twelfth language resources and evaluation conference, 3922–3931. Marseille: European Language Resources Association Available at: https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.483/.Suche in Google Scholar

McCarthy, Arya D., Ekaterina Vylomova, Shijie Wu, Chaitanya Malaviya, Lawrence Wolf-Sonkin, Nicolai Garrett, Christo Kirov, Miikka Silfverberg, Sabrina J. Mielke, Jeffrey Heinz, Ryan Cotterell & Mans Hulden. 2019. The SIGMORPHON 2019 shared task: Morphological analysis in context and cross-lingual transfer for inflection. In Garrett Nicolai & Ryan Cotterell (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th workshop on computational research in phonetics, phonology, and morphology, 229–244. Florence: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/W19-4226Suche in Google Scholar

McClelland, James L. & Karalyn Patterson. 2002. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(11). 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01993-9.Suche in Google Scholar

McCurdy, Kate, Sharon Goldwater & Adam Lopez. 2020a. Inflecting when there’s no majority: Limitations of encoder-decoder neural networks as cognitive models for German plurals. In Dan Jurafsky, Joyce Chai, Natalie Schluter & Joel Tetreault (eds.), Proceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 1745–1756. Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.159Suche in Google Scholar

McCurdy, Kate, Adam Lopez & Sharon Goldwater. 2020b. Conditioning, but on which distribution? Grammatical gender in German plural inflection. In Emmanuele Chersoni, Cassandra Jacobs, Yohei Oseki, Laurent Prévot & Enrico Santus (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on cognitive modeling and computational linguistics, 59–65. Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2020.cmcl-1.8Suche in Google Scholar

Mugdan, Joachim. 1977. Flexionsmorphologie und psycholinguistik. Tübingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar

Nair, Sathvik & Philip Resnik. 2023. Words, subwords, and morphemes: What really matters in the surprisal-reading time relationship? In Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino & Kalika Bali (eds.), Findings of the association for computational linguistics: EMNLP 2023, 11251–11260. Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.752Suche in Google Scholar

Nzeyimana, Antoine & Andre Niyongabo Rubungo. 2022. KinyaBERT: A morphology-aware Kinyarwanda language model. In Smaranda Muresan, Preslav Nakov & Aline Villavicencio (eds.), Proceedings of the 60th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (volume 1: Long papers), 5347–5363. Dublin: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.367Suche in Google Scholar

Palermo, David S. & V. Lynn Eberhart. 1968. On the learning of morphological rules: An experimental analogy. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7(2). 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(68)80012-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Payne, Sarah. 2022. When collisions are a good thing: The acquisition of morphological marking. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Bachelor’s thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2002. Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In R. Bod, J. Hay & S. Jannedy (eds.), Probabilistic linguistics, 177–228. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5582.003.0009Suche in Google Scholar

Pimentel, Tiago, Maria Ryskina, Sabrina J. Mielke, Shijie Wu, Eleanor Chodroff, Brian Leonard, Garrett Nicolai, Yustinus Ghanggo Ate, Salam Khalifa, Nizar Habash, Charbel El-Khaissi, Omer Goldman, Michael Gasser, William Lane, Matt Coler, Arturo Oncevay, Jaime Rafael Montoya Samame, Gema Celeste Silva Villegas, Adam Ek, Jean-Philippe Bernardy, Andrey Shcherbakov, Aziyana Bayyr-ool, Karina Sheifer, Sofya Ganieva, Matvey Plugaryov, Elena Klyachko, Salehi Ali, Andrew Krizhanovsky, Natalia Krizhanovsky, Clara Vania, Sardana Ivanova, Aelita Salchak, Christopher Straughn, Zoey Liu, Jonathan North Washington, Duygu Ataman, Witold Kieraś, Marcin Woliński, Totok Suhardijanto, Niklas Stoehr, Zahroh Nuriah, Shyam Ratan, Francis M. Tyers, Edoardo M. Ponti, Grant Aiton, Richard J. Hatcher, Emily Prud’hommeaux, Ritesh Kumar, Mans Hulden, Botond Barta, Dorina Lakatos, Gábor Szolnok, Judit Ács, Mohit Raj, David Yarowsky, Cotterell Ryan, Ambridge Ben & Ekaterina Vylomova. 2021. SIGMORPHON 2021 shared task on morphological reinflection: Generalization across languages. In Garrett Nicolai, Kyle Gorman & Ryan Cotterell (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th SIGMORPHON workshop on computational research in phonetics, phonology, and morphology, 229–259. Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2021.sigmorphon-1.25Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1991. Rules of language. Science 253(5019). 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1857983.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 2006. Whatever happened to the past tense debate? In Eric Baković, Junko Ito & John J. McCarthy (eds.), Wondering at the natural fecundity of things: Essays in honor of Alan Prince, 221–238. Santa Cruz: eScholarship.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven & Alan Prince. 1988. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28(1-2). 73–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90032-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven & Michael T. Ullman. 2002. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(11). 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Plunkett, Kim & Patrick Juola. 1999. A connectionist model of English past tense and plural morphology. Cognitive Science 23(4). 463–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(99)00012-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Plunkett, Kim & Virginia Marchman. 1991. U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition 38(1). 43–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90022-v.Suche in Google Scholar

Plunkett, Kim & Virginia Marchman. 1993. From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition 48(1). 21–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90057-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Plunkett, Kim & Ramin Charles Nakisa. 1997. A connectionist model of the Arabic plural system. Language and Cognitive Processes 12(5–6). 807–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386691.Suche in Google Scholar

Prasada, Sandeep & Steven Pinker. 1993. Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes 8(1). 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308406948.Suche in Google Scholar

Ravid, Dorit & Rola Farah. 1999. Learning about noun plurals in early Palestinian Arabic. First Language 19(56). 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379901905603.Suche in Google Scholar

Rumelhart, David E. & James L. McClelland. 1986. On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In David E. Rumelhart, James L. McClelland & The PDP Research Group (eds.) Parallel distributed processing, Vol. 2, 216–271. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schöler, Hermann & Werner Kany. 1989. Lernprozesse beim Erwerb von Flexionsmorphemen: Ein Vergleich sprachbehinderter mit sprachunauffälligen Kindern am Beispiel der Pluralmarkierung (Untersuchungen I und II). In Gerd Kegel, Thomas Arnhold, Klaus Dahlmeier, Gerhard Schmid & Bernd Tischer (eds.), Sprechwissenschaft & Psycholinguistik 3: Beiträge aus Forschung und Praxis, 123–175. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.10.1007/978-3-322-97004-6_4Suche in Google Scholar

Segbers, Jutta & Sascha Schroeder. 2017. How many words do children know? A corpus-based estimation of children’s total vocabulary size. Language Testing 34(3). 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216641152.Suche in Google Scholar

Seidenberg, Mark S. & David C. Plaut. 2014. Quasiregularity and its discontents: The legacy of the past tense debate. Cognitive Science 38(6). 1190–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12147.Suche in Google Scholar

Shipley, Kenneth G. & Julie G. McAfee. 2023. Assessment in speech-language pathology: A resource manual. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Sonnenstuhl, Ingrid & Axel Huth. 2002. Processing and representation of German -n plurals: A dual mechanism approach. Brain and Language 81(1–3). 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2524.Suche in Google Scholar

Swingley, Daniel & Colman Humphrey. 2018. Quantitative linguistic predictors of infants’ learning of specific English words. Child Development 89(4). 1247–1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12731.Suche in Google Scholar

Szagun, Gisela, Claudia Steinbrink, Melanie Franik & Barbara Stumper. 2006. Development of vocabulary and grammar in young German-speaking children assessed with a German language development inventory. First Language 26(3). 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723706056475.Suche in Google Scholar

Ullman, Michael T. 1999. Acceptability ratings of regular and irregular past-tense forms: Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighbourhood effects. Language and Cognitive Processes 14(1). 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386374.Suche in Google Scholar

Vylomova, Ekaterina, Jennifer White, Elizabeth Salesky, Sabrina J. Mielke, Shijie Wu, Edoardo Maria Ponti, Rowan Hall Maudslay, Ran Zmigrod, Josef Valvoda, Svetlana Toldova, Francis Tyers, Elena Klyachko, Ilya Yegorov, Natalia Krizhanovsky, Paula Czarnowska, Irene Nikkarinen, Andrew Krizhanovsky, Tiago Pimentel, Lucas Torroba Hennigen, Christo Kirov, Garrett Nicolai, Adina Williams, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Hilaria Cruz, Eleanor Chodroff, Ryan Cotterell, Miikka Silfverberg & Mans Hulden. 2020. SIGMORPHON 2020 shared task 0: Typologically diverse morphological inflection. In Garrett Nicolai, Kyle Gorman & Ryan Cotterell (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th SIGMORPHON workshop on computational research in phonetics, phonology, and morphology, 1–39. Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2020.sigmorphon-1.1Suche in Google Scholar

Warstadt, Alex & Samuel R. Bowman. 2022. What artificial neural networks can tell us about human language acquisition. In Shalom Lappin & Jean-Philippe Bernardy (eds.), Algebraic structures in natural language, 17–60. Boca Raton: CRC Press.10.1201/9781003205388-2Suche in Google Scholar

Wehrli, Silvan, Clematide Simon & Peter Makarov. 2022. CLUZH at SIGMORPHON 2022 shared tasks on morpheme segmentation and inflection generation. In Garrett Nicolai & Eleanor Chodroff (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th SIGMORPHON workshop on computational research in phonetics, phonology, and morphology, 212–219. Seattle: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2022.sigmorphon-1.21Suche in Google Scholar

Westermann, Gert. 1999. Single mechanism but not single route: Learning verb inflections in constructivist neural networks. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(6). 1042–1043. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x9952222x.Suche in Google Scholar

Westermann, Gert & Rainer Goebel. 1995. Connectionist rules of language. In Johanna D. Moore & Jill Fain Lehman (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th annual conference of the cognitive science society, 236–241. eScholarship.Suche in Google Scholar

Wiemerslage, Adam, Arya D. McCarthy, Alexander Erdmann, Garrett Nicolai, Manex Agirrezabal, Miikka Silfverberg, Mans Hulden & Katharina Kann. 2021. Findings of the SIGMORPHON 2021 shared task on unsupervised morphological paradigm clustering. In Garrett Nicolai, Kyle Gorman & Ryan Cotterell (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th SIGMORPHON workshop on computational research in phonetics, phonology, and morphology, 72–81. Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2021.sigmorphon-1.8Suche in Google Scholar

Wiese, Richard. 1996. The phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, Shijie, Ryan Cotterell & Mans Hulden. 2021. Applying the transformer to character-level transduction. In Paola Merlo, Jorg Tiedemann & Reut Tsarfaty (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Main volume, 1901–1907. Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.163Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, Fei & Steven Pinker. 1995. Weird past tense forms. Journal of Child Language 22(3). 531–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900009946.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Charles. 2002. Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Charles. 2016. The price of linguistic productivity: How children learn to break the rules of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262035323.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Zipf, George Kingsley. 1936. The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Abingdon: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar